Mini 1698: MDCXCVIII [C'est fini!]
-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
People discussing my vote wrote:RVS literally requires no reason and D1 requires only a weak one.
Yeah I Dont like this. Town doesn't need cover for a vote.
Switching from a singleton vote to another person with no votes on them seems rather pointless when the aim is to get the game moving and start seeing how people react to votes. I wanted to vote for GrayFoxxxx, but there wasn't much point in it and I didn't particularly like any other votes I saw.
My reasoning is similar to Khan's. Overjustified RVS votes are scummy, although this was a minor case.
Another miscellaneous thing: Khan's vote/reasoning is not a towntell. Reasoning is reasoning, it's the kind of thing that will be done as either town or scum.
Gray wrote:Also, there are better ways to avoid reactions. Your analysis is false.
For me at least, it's not about actively avoiding reactions. It's more of a subconscious thing.-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
In post 90, GrayFoxxxx wrote:In post 89, implosion wrote:For me at least, it's not about actively avoiding reactions. It's more of a subconscious thing.
You subconsciously think I'm scum?
No, I'm saying that scum will subconsciously do things like overjustifying RVS votes because they want to avoid being conspicuous. Hence there being other ways to avoid reactions is irrelevant. But I also somewhat like post 80, so.
Unvote
VOTE: Necessary Evil
Necessary Evil voted for Mario for doing something "strange", without equating strange with scummy. When questioned on it he once again called it strange. I'd like a better explanation of why strange in this case equates to scummy.
Good candidates for town so far are dragonspawn and Woody, and maybe Shazam. Boonskiies also might be scum.-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
In post 98, GrayFoxxxx wrote:In post 95, implosion wrote:I wasn't sheeping KK, I just didn't have enough of an inclination to vote for you before I saw that it would make a wagon.
But you said
In post 49, implosion wrote:Unvote
VOTE: GrayFoxxxx
I wanted to do this earlier but there was no one else voting him so it wasn't really worth it. Thank you, KK.
So you did or didn't want to vote me before Kahn did? Youre flip flopping.
I'm not flip flopping, you're misinterpreting me. I had some inclination to vote before KK voted, but not enough to actually vote. I wasn't sheeping because I was voting him for my own reasons.-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
In post 112, dragonspawn wrote:In post 95, implosion wrote:I wasn't sheeping KK, I just didn't have enough of an inclination to vote for you before I saw that it would make a wagon. Obviously I could be lying about that if I'm scum but that would be a bit silly, no?
Don't like this either. Why do you need to wait for others to make a wagon? Town has no reason not to create the wagons on suspects even if no one else sees it yet.
Scum on the other hand doesn't want to rock the boat.
A single vote is not creating a wagon, and I had no reason at the time to believe that anyone would vote with me. I wanted a better place to put my vote. I was also only looking at the game for 10 minutes or so.
In those 10 minutes, I didn't see it as productive to change my vote to a different person who had no votes. Maybe you would have if you had been me, but you're not.-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
Also, Woody, to actually address the point you're making... yes, Shazam didn't RVS vote. He voted with an actual reason (whether or not he actually thought it was a strong reason to vote). Gray voted with a fabricated reason, or a pseudo-random reason.
Besides, just because two people do similar things in two posts, doesn't mean they made the same post. Different posts can have different feels to them. And "I've seen town do X" does not mean that X is not scummy.-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
GrayFoxxxx wrote:In post 102, implosion wrote:I'm not flip flopping, you're misinterpreting me. I had some inclination to vote before KK voted, but not enough to actually vote. I wasn't sheeping because I was voting him for my own reasons.
Your own reasons?
The only one you have given is because KK voted me. (Sheeping).
I was like meh about the vote but your logic here isn't good at all.
Nope. I did give my own reason, even though it was similar to KK's.
In post 89, implosion wrote:
My reasoning is similar to Khan's. Overjustified RVS votes are scummy, although this was a minor case.
I felt that way before KK had voted for you, I just didn't say it because I was on a short break and, again, didn't have enough of an impetus to vote for you.-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
In post 126, Boonskiies wrote:Khan's like the towniest guy besides me.
You realize that this is tangential to the argument that you've been having for the past page that led nowhere, right?
I also really fail to see what was towny about his reasoning. Like I said, I think it's logical, but it isn't a towntell.-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
Why are you so concerned with your vote's 'weight' so early?
Because people (aka Grayfoxxxx) keep asking me about it? I'm not going to ignore questions or arguments made towards me.
Like why are you more focused on your votes placement than on addressing scumreads or producing content?
I have addressed reads and produced content; points were made towards me, so I'm going to address those points. No one has criticized any of myreadsas of yet, so I haven't discussed any in-depth. I've given a number of townreads (dragon, woody, shazam) and a current scumread on NE; I gave a scumread on foxxxx which I've since retracted, and a weak scumread on Boon, which I've since retracted (he's now in the townread pile, foxxxx is null). I can go in-depth into any involved reasoning if desired.
Another point I have been harping on, and will harp on more: KK really has not towntold yet. Everything he's done so far is just pure reasoning; it isn't necessarily a towntell for him just because you agree with his reasoning. I'd like to hear from Boon why KK is town.
I would have also expected you to vote him after you said you wanted to. Why havent you?
Not sure what you mean; i am voting NE right now. He's still somewhat scummy.-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
dragonspawn wrote:Been looking over implosion some more and I just see more questions. He didn't want to "waste" his vote by voting for gray before he knew whether a wagon could start, but he didn't hesitate being the first vote on woody at the beginning or being the first vote on evil after giving this explanation. So why was voting first on gray a wasted vote but voting first on woody and evil perfectly alright?
My first vote was more or less an rvs vote. My recent vote was after I no longer liked my vote on gray, in the stage of the game where things were happening. At the time that I was thinking of voting grayfoxxxx, I wanted the game to start picking up, so there was relatively little reason to switch from one vote to another without forming a wagon.
I look this over and I see backtracking by someone who is caught making a mistake. It's a sign of a guilty conscience and bad reasoning.
Sorry, but I'm not a dumb enough player to make a "mistake" like that... I'm more than anything annoyed at being repeatedly questioned on something so inane. It really is meaningless. I would much rather focus on scumhunting, or at least answering questions about things I've done that are actually meaningful. There's no reason that I would backtrack over something so simple as a the reasoning for a page two vote as either alignment.
@bulba, a marathon kingmaker game is really completely irrelevant to a regular mafia game. Acting that way and "hiding behind" things is normal in kingmaker regardless of alignment.
I'm really not getting a good read on mario from his play so far. I need to see more from him, will probably look more closely at what he's posted so far shortly.-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
Yeah, mario has said a lot without saying a lot. The last line of 79 feels gut-townish. He needs to say more. In particular he actually needs to give any reads at all before I can be confident of much.-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
Almost everything has a meaning in Mafia. Players give subconscious clues to their alignment. That's what the game is all about.
You would backtrack if you were bothered by the pressure you were under and that is generally a scum tell.
I kind of disagree. A lot of things have meaning, probably most things. But certain behaviors, especially after you've played a lot of games, are just automatic regardless of alignment. I'm pretty much always going to be honest about reads and reasons early day one, as town because I'm town, and as scum because I've found it's the easiest way for me to act town. That honesty is automatic. Me backtracking implies that I did something that I didn't at the time have a justification for doing, and that's just not something I'd do regardless of alignment, even if that justification is as simple as "I felt like it." I have no reason to lie or backtrack this early as scum.
I might "backtrack" in the sense that I need to (accurately) justify my past behavior if I'm bothered by the pressure regardless of alignment, because regardless of alignment I'd rather pressure be focused elsewhere.
Additionally note that in this post, NE dances around the issue of my alignment. He's commenting on the situation, and saying that I might backtrack maybe and that it's generally a scumtell, so he's sort of throwing a broad paintbrush stroke of suspicion towards me without actually committing to a read. That's scummy.-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
In post 192, Boonskiies wrote:@Impolsion - you won't see more of him. He posts once and leaves. He doesn't read the thread thoroughly.
He's posting a decent amount, he just needs to say less about unimportant mafia-theoretic opinions and more about reads.
Stubbs also needs to post more. I keep looking at his opening post and not liking it. And he hasn't posted since then. FA_Q2 also needs to post more although I don't particularly dislike his posts so far.-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
boon wrote:@Grayfoxxx - it's day fucking 1, why are you trying so hard to derail the Mario votes? For the most part, it's just pressure, no one is actually going to lynch him yet. You are completely going against a town win con by trying to stop a wagon pointlessly. IT'S FUCKING PAGE 9! Let a wagon form and see how he reacts to the pressure and how others react to him.
This is a bit of an overreaction, no?
Boon, you're the one who needs to chill out (passionate or not)... people are allowed to defend other people early in the game. "Pressure is good" is not some universal formula to winning as town; this is doubly true if, as you seem to be saying, Mario is the kind of player who is never going to give us any kind of useful reaction.
Gray is saying that he's using the information from the wagon to start scumhunting, while you're essentially demanding that we continue wagoning to obtain more information. Those are just two different playstyles or two different ways of looking at things. I actually personally see Gray as townier and townier in these pages.
Gray wrote:His vote on me was very odd.
I can see you seeing it as odd. But odd does not equate to scummy. But w/e.
I like a bulb vote better than a mario vote. Nothing that mario posted gives me strong feelings except for that line that I mentioned gave me a gut town read. And it also just isn't going to be productive from a pressure standpoint if he's a chronic lurker.
Bulb has said relevant things towards mario, but he hasn't made any comments about literally anyone else in the game since RVS. He says he finds Mario the scummiest... but that's a very vague statement when he hasn't given a single read on anyone else.
Unvote
VOTE: bulb
I still want to visit NE, but people are ignoring my points on him (particularly the bottom of 193). He's still acting scummy. He's essentially ignoring everything in the game except for Mario because he says he's waiting on Mario to see whether or not he answers the question, or what else he does, while he asks random questions towards people in the mean time. Waiting for days to give a better read on one person while ignoring forming reads on other players is not town play, it's scum trying to stay under the radar and create an excuse for not creating content. Three of his most recent four posts (134, 167, the first half of 238) are all basically just saying exactly this with different wording. He's talking a lot about the development of his mario read, but not much else.
If anyone could give any additional opinions on NE, it'd be appreciated.-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
I've been lazy today.
I explained my scumread on Bulb (mostly directed at dragonspawn who asked why). But he very immediately did what I said he hadn't been doing, which is a decent sign.
Unvote
The way pisskop is actively fighting the mario/dom wagon rather than just complaining about it reads more as town trying to prevent a bad lynch than as scum trying to gain towncred for derailing a mislynch (or scum trying to defend a buddy). So pisskop is a townread.
In response to Dom's ]316:
no explaination for that?
I don't always explain townreads without being asked; if you want, I can explain it.
As for the second quote from me in that post... IDK what Dom is saying, I'm not calling gray scum in the quoted post, I'm pretty sure Dom is misreading it (I explicitly called gray null in the post that he quoted, yet he asked why I was calling him scummy).
Still catching up, just don't want post to be too giant.-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
I don't like KK's vote on pisskop in 333 (beyond just disagreeing with pisskop being scum). It seems like grasping to me. He criticizes pisskop's reasoning for unvoting that he's been lynched for not doing it before, as if only scum has a reason to avoid being lynched, which is just overtly wrong. Beyond that KK just criticizes things that I don't see much reason to find scummy. I feel like there are so many other things that have happened in this game that focusing and voting based on the quotes he brings up is odd in a somewhat scummy way. It just doesn't feel like genuine reasoning to me.
It baffles me that the entire town seems to strongly townread KK. Based on what has looked to me like a series of mostly completely null posts, and now this.
Necessary Evil wrote:I know I've been tunneling on Mario but I found him really scummy and I'm not to confident in my other reads. I wanted to focus attention on him to create pressure. I'm not sure about TheDominator37 yet.
I find Woody a bit scummy. His posting seems to be rather fluffy as Boonskiies pointed out, but he has are some town tells, too. I'm just not sure. I thought GrayFoxxx was scummy before but his recent posts look like town. I definitely see the case on Bulbazoor. I kind of see the case on pisskop, too, but I'm not sure.
The main problem right now is that we have a couple of players that haven't contributed much (FA_Q2 and StubbsKVM). It is easy for scum to sit back and watch townies lynch each other.
How does anyone else not see this guy as scummy? He's giving himself SO much explicit wiggle room here. He doesn't want to call a bunch of people null because then it won't sound like he's giving concrete reads, so he says Woody is scummy but has some towntells, Gray was scummy but has also towntold, that he can see the case for one growing wagon, and that he can kind of see another case. That is just so overtly waffley. He's building in room to go in whichever direction is most convenient in an extremely underhanded way.
He then proceeds to vote a lurker for an opportunistic vote. Which is pretty much the least risky possible way to vote if you're scum.
Idk. Only ONE person has said anything regarding NE in response to the points I've made (correct me if I'm wrong), and that's Shazam.-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
FA_Q2 wrote:To me this essentially reads that "oh you scum read me for my vote on you then Ill just sheep your vote then." It looks to me like an attempt to shift grays suspicions off of him - and it seems to have worked.
I don't want gray to suspect me; I think gray is town, and if I'm correct than him (or any other town member) suspecting me is a bad thing. I very well may be subconsciously (lol, that word) trying to get people not to suspect me, because I as town would rather not be under suspicion so that we can focus on people who may be scum. Beyond that... idk, that just seems like a really weak reason to vote. Why would I care specifically about gray and not all of the other people who have been suspecting me for a while if I'm scum?
The only salient point I see that makes me suspect the Dom slot is the possibility that Mario was just a bad new player under pressure as scum. Idk. I guess I should look at the game in question. I just don't know if, if it is the case that he replaced out because he's new/feeling pressure, if he would do that even if he was feeling pressure as town. Dom's play so far is very eh.
VOTE: Necessary Evil-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
I disagree that he would cave so heavily to pressure even if he was town. If he really was town and therefore: a) had nothing to hide and b) had less to fear from his own lynch, he would not have reacted so poorly.
Well, I'm not saying this is the case, just that it could be. It's a personality thing. There are plenty of people who would do that kind of thing regardless of alignment (and even those who would be more likely to do it as town because of anger, although that pretty clearly isn't the case here). It is probably still a scumtell if he's done it before as scum, though. I'm just not convinced it's, say, a perfect confidence kind of thing.
I think the most important word in your post is "overtly". He seems to be outright admitting that he's leaving himself wiggle room, because he's admitting that he doesn't know that much at this point. I don't see that as scummy, just useless.
My point is that town would be more explicit (maybe calling the post overt was misleading). NE's post to me as town would give explicit conclusions. He would say that boon/gray/pisskop are null (or his actual opinions on them), rather than dancing around the issue in a way that could be interpreted in literally whatever way he wants. All three of those reads quoted call the people in question both town and scum in one way or another. Saying "X is scummy, but has towntold" about three people in one post as town is like leaving a sentence incomplete. There should be more there explaining how he feels about those players explicitly.-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
In post 408, Necessary Evil wrote:In post 402, implosion wrote:I think the most important word in your post is "overtly". He seems to be outright admitting that he's leaving himself wiggle room, because he's admitting that he doesn't know that much at this point. I don't see that as scummy, just useless.
My point is that town would be more explicit (maybe calling the post overt was misleading). NE's post to me as town would give explicit conclusions. He would say that boon/gray/pisskop are null (or his actual opinions on them), rather than dancing around the issue in a way that could be interpreted in literally whatever way he wants. All three of those reads quoted call the people in question both town and scum in one way or another. Saying "X is scummy, but has towntold" about three people in one post as town is like leaving a sentence incomplete. There should be more there explaining how he feels about those players explicitly.
I was explicit as I possibly could be. I named people that at one time or another I thought could be scum. None of them are null. There is no dancing around here; I was completely honest about my reads on players that could be scum. I didn't mention players that I thought were null or town on purpose because I think that gives scum information.
Unvotefor now. I'm going to reread when I get a chance.
Hrng. In trying to explain how he was being explicitNE continues to use the same hedging, non-explicit language."People that at one time or another I thought could be scum." "My reads on players that could be scum."The strongest thing he is willing to say about these players is that they "could be scum."Literally anyone could be scum. Saying "they could be scum" towards people leaves so much wiggle room. NE just keeps making my point again and again with every post.-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
In post 438, Boonskiies wrote:Honestly, the people on the Mario wagon are tunneling less than the people who aren't. I'm considering other options besides Mario, where as you people are flat out against voting Mario, and only giving ONE other option. I've named multiple. I've also named some town reads of mine, while sharing who I can't figure out. The push AGAINST Mario is far worse than the push for Mario.
Phone post but.
Idk why you're reducing people not on the wagon to some kind of conglomerate. A ton of different alternatives have been offered/fossed over the course of the day.-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
In post 437, Boonskiies wrote:In post 435, WoodyWoodpecker wrote:Also just cause somebody has a case, doesn't mean it's right. I can make a case on anyone if I put my mind to it
Except it is right. mario's fucking scum. You have no actual reason to say it's a bad case unless you KNOW he is not scum, or maybe even a buddy of yours. You have some hidden info, Woody? It's appearing more and more so.
This is also just stupid. No one is obligated to believe your case. By your logic you should sheep me on to necessary evil because you don't KNOW he isn't scum.-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
Boon wrote:It's not MY fucking case. Don't fucking say 'your case'. I haven't once faught your fucking NE case? At all. I'm not defending it either. Wanna know why? BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE FUCK HE IS. This is completely proving exactly what I just said, so thanks for being the most ignorant idiot ever and accidentally proving my point.
Assuming you're town, you don't know what anyone else is, including the Mario slot. You just suspect him of being scum. Likewise, some others suspect him of being town. So why are you allowed to share your opinion, but when others aren't? Sorry for calling it your case if it isn't; that wasn't my point.
Additionally, I would absolutely love if you fought my NE case (or supported it!) Cases are an excellent springboard for discussion.
Also, please be civil. There's no need to call me an ignorant idiot; we should be having a discussion, not flinging names. As far as I can tell, this argument is about a difference in philosophy, there is absolutely no need to get so heated over it. You seem to be arguing that others should scumhunt in the same way that you do, but I scumhunt better by primarily acquiring townreads. Sometimes those townreads may conflict with cases that have been made (in this case I don't actually strongly townread the Mario slot, but others seem to). I don't understand why you think the case on Mario should be immune to criticism.-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
Just because someone disagrees with you, doesn't mean they're scum. Woody seems to understand that. I'm not sure if boon does, given a couple of the things he's said. His current Woody fos just looks like him fossing Woody for disagreeing... which is honestly just stupid. This post gives the same impression.
I have ardently townread my biggest detractors for the way that they have disagreed with me. I'm honestly not sure if Boon is looking for intent in Woody's posts or if he's just blindly decided that it's him vs Woody.
This entire thing is kind of turning into us vs them (namely, those on the mario wagon refusing to find any common ground with those off it).-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
I think one of my biggest pet peeves is this, though...
Boon wrote:I think your NE case is fine. I don't think the mario case should be immune to criticism, just not defended to hell. Like god damn. be open fucking minded, people.
People disagree with you. They are allowed to do that. That does not make them closed minded. People are allowed to review the evidence and come to a different conclusion than you from reviewing the same evidence. If people have strong opinions they will defend those opinions strongly.-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
In post 513, Boonskiies wrote:In post 511, Kublai Khan wrote:At what point are you all going to realize that scum doesn't generally work that hard on Day 1?
one of the towniest people in this game. He isn't posting all to much, and yet, he still says this. No way he is scum. I like how people just 'forgot' they scum read Khan too.
I'm willing to call this a minor towntell but I can absolutely see scum-khan posting this.
Shazam wrote:Can I just point out that Dominator's post rate has dropped significantly since fewer people have been voting him? Could it be more painfully obvious that he is more interested in self-preservation than finding scum?
I have done this as town before. I've had countless town games where I needed the motivation of a fire under my feet to get me going later in the day.
And Woody's been pretty damn logical imo.-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
Shazam wrote:imo, the only people that even COULD be scumread are Mario/Dom, you (Woodpecker), implosion, Boonskiees, and GrayFoxxx. So I'll ask you this: which of those seems scummiest to you?
Just saw this gem in Shazam's iso... apart from Mario, it reads like a who's-who of my strong townreads <_>. I guess his point is just that no one else had posted enough, but I think I just disagree with that in general. Also idk. There's just so much fucking black-and-white rhetoric going on. It's really starting to piss me off. This is a complex fucking game. Almost nothing is ever fucking black-and-white until it's over. Reads are a good thing. Saying "I don't think anyone could possibly read anyone else as scum outside of these five people" is just patently absurd. It's like trying to say that anyone who disagrees with you isa prioriwrong, which is just not how productive debate occurs. Maybe I'm just seeing a couple instances of it and it feels like it's everywhere but idk.
We're not going to get anywhere productive like this... although i guess ultimately the problem right now with this game is that there's a large group of lurkers, and I think that a lot of the scum are in the lurkers (including NE, who I'm counting just because no one is in his slot right now so the slot can't post).
My gut at this point says Dom is town. I don't have the best explicit reasoning for that, it just feels like he hasn't been playing like scum replacing into a slot under pressure. And I just don't agree with any of the points on him with the possible exception of the one I've mentioned (the replacing out as scum under pressure point). And Idk, part of me thinks that this game sort of makes sense on a very vague level if Shazam is scum, but that's a terrible reason to scumread Shazam.
Still reading though.-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
The angle that I'm looking at this game right now is something like this.
I'm not interested in pursuing any of {Woody, Boon, Gray, dragon, pisskop} more today.
{FA, Stubbs} idk. I think i get a scumvibe from Stubbs's ISO and a townvibe from FA's so we'll put them in those buckets weakly for now.
Dom gut says town. This is very much open to change but I have yet to see something strong enough to sway me.
Khan I just feel like for the most part people are reading too strongly into everything he's said/done but I think there's a good chance he's scum.
NE's slot is my strongest scumread but the replace-out doesn't exactly help me have strong opinions about this game...
Bulba is kind of a very weak gut townread right now. A lot of the phrasings on his posts feel genuine (like 297) which is somewhat subtle, and I also liked the fact that he immediately gave a reads list after I criticized him for being narrow in scope.
And that leaves Shazam. A lot of his posts are dense rhetoric/logic, and I don't think being logical is really a tell. I guess an ordering right now looks something like this:
NE ~~~~ Stubbs ~ Khan ~ Shazam ~ FA ~ Dom ~ Bulba ~~~~ Core townreads.
Still need to look more closely at Shazam but every time I look at his ISO I get nowhere.-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
Note the "strong" that you apply to your townreads on those players. This is precisely my point. Only those people who post significant content can be strongly read. At that point in the game, and to some extent now, the people I listed were, besides myself, the only people with significant content. Thus I was not saying "people who disagree with me are automatically wrong", but "people who think they find scum outside of these people cannot show themselves to be right".
I agree that at least one lurker is probably scum. But it's easier to find them later.
Eh, this is true to some degree. I've had strong townreads from minimal posts before but I guess those are mostly exceptions.
I guess what I disagree with is the conclusion (if this is what you would say) that this means we should focus on those people. I think my strongest two scumreads right now in NE/Stubbs are both in the lurk pool and I would rather focus towards them because I want to maximize the odds of lynching scum.
I guess my ultimate hope is that these seemingly pointless circles of rhetoric will magically end with all of the townies involved townreading each other and that it looks nigh impossible that that's going to happen. I could of course be wrong about all those reads but ~~~~~-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
-
-
implosion he/himPolymath
-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
I think I agree with boon's assessment of FA's most recent slew of posts. Something about the way he frames Woody/boon's interaction feels off. He just says that he doesn't like them because of the exchange without any further explanation, but it seems strange that the first thing that would come to mind after such a heated back-and-forth exchange would be that they both become scummier for having been involved. It just feels like an excuse to vote Woody and lead in to a Boon fos tomorrow. He talks about information from the lynch in the case that we get scum, but lynching scum is almost always going to give useful information.
I feel like taking this argument and framing it as "there's probably scum amongst the two of them" is a fairly likely scum tactic. And I don't see it as being a likely reaction to the argument as town. So. This is further strengthened to some degree by my still thinking both of them are town.
I also have a good initial impression of Annarchy's (Stubbs replacement) opening.
Unvote
VOTE: FA
Still have a (decently) strong scumread on the NE slot, contingent of course on spicer's posting. But my votes have been dead ends for pretty much this entire day, and I think I'm happy with this vote right now.-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
Like, if you're criticizing me for voting FA after boon did solely because you think it's sheeping then you're basically criticizing me for agreeing with someone and acting on that agreement... which is just silly, especially when I gave my own specific reasons for suspecting those posts. I looked at them more because Boon mentioned them, and then came to my own conclusions, which happen to align with his.
That isn't sheeping.-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
In post 748, WoodyWoodpecker wrote:Idk imp, jusy agreeing with somebody is sheeping, but that's not what I saw you do. You added more commentary to your post and explained yourself better
Yeah, that's what I'm saying. It was just convenient to quote FA since he already said that thing, I wasn't commenting on whether or not FA was sheeping.-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
In post 792, dragonspawn wrote:I'm not really liking the push on fa. I understand boons reasoning for it but the other votes are just making me uneasy.
Okay, what the fuck? Boon's reasoning was literally "Something doesn't sit right." He also criticized one of FA's posts but it was mostly him defending against those points, not criticizing those points as being scummy (correct me if I'm wrong, I'm leaving soon so I could only skim).
My vote gave explicit reasoning.
How the hell can you understand boon's reasoning for it better than mine?
Will answer other questions later.-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
In post 818, FA_Q2 wrote:In post 740, implosion wrote:I think I agree with boon's assessment of FA's most recent slew of posts. Something about the way he frames Woody/boon's interaction feels off. He just says that he doesn't like them because of the exchange without any further explanation, but it seems strange that the first thing that would come to mind after such a heated back-and-forth exchange would be that they both become scummier for having been involved. It just feels like an excuse to vote Woody and lead in to a Boon fos tomorrow. He talks about information from the lynch in the case that we get scum, but lynching scum is almost always going to give useful information.
I feel like taking this argument and framing it as "there's probably scum amongst the two of them" is a fairly likely scum tactic. And I don't see it as being a likely reaction to the argument as town. So. This is further strengthened to some degree by my still thinking both of them are town.
I also have a good initial impression of Annarchy's (Stubbs replacement) opening.
Unvote
VOTE: FA
Still have a (decently) strong scumread on the NE slot, contingent of course on spicer's posting. But my votes have been dead ends for pretty much this entire day, and I think I'm happy with this vote right now.
I don’t like the exchange because it completely shut out any scum hunting in its entirety and changed the focus of the game from finding scum to useless vitriolic nonsense. What is unclear about that?
Then I gave further reasons for my vote on pecker. And you are damn right if pecker flips town I will suspect boon, he is a scum read after all. I don’t see how that is anti-town.
It was also called opportunistic which is asinine – it was opportunistic insofar as it was a direct reaction to the way the players were behaving. I guess voting for a direct scum claim would be ‘opportunistic’ as well.
Vitriol is a fine reason to dislike it in the sense of dislike as in thinking it's a bad thing. It isn't in the sense of dislike as in thinking it's a scummy thing, which looks like how you were using the word "dislike." You call them scummy for engaging in such vitriol, with absolutely no justification of why being so vitriolic is scummy. I'm not criticizing any other reasons you gave towards Woody, just that.
I'm not calling you anti-town (at least, in my mind, anti-town is a different thing from scummy, anti-town means contrary to the interest of the town whereas scummy means indicative of scum). I'm calling it scummy because from a scum perspective it sets you up to have an easy route to follow tomorrow and I don't think equating vitriol to scum is a likely town reaction.
Will get to Boon's outstanding question in ~an hour.-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
To answer Boon's question: I see Anna's play so far as townish. I think she's exhibited genuine lines of reasoning. I think from what I've seen you have a tendency to decry anything that disagrees with you or attacks you as lies. I honestly can't remember anyone who has attacked you at all that you haven't responded with some kind of mutual animosity (Woody, FA, now Anna). I'm probably forgetting some case where you have but that's really a bad habit if you're town.-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
In post 839, dragonspawn wrote:Well give me some reason to comment and I will say more. I'm not in the mood to get involved in pointless bickering.
I asked you a question. Are you actually reading the thread?-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
In post 840, GrayFoxxxx wrote:In post 839, dragonspawn wrote:Well give me some reason to comment and I will say more. I'm not in the mood to get involved in pointless bickering.
I can relate to this.
I'd be okay with itif I hadn't literally given him that reason earlier today.Idk if he thinks it'd be pointless bickering to answer my question or what, but an answer to that question will help me read him.-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
Because you don't know for a fact that I'm scum if you are town?
Because I might not be lynched today?
Because it's common courtesy to answer questions?
Because my response might help you read me better, either solidifying your scumread on me or losing faith in it?
Because my response might help you convince others to vote for me?
Because it might help others read you?
Because being generally unwilling to discuss things is harmful to the town?
Because you don't want to be read as scum for avoiding my question?-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
In post 852, WoodyWoodpecker wrote:In post 850, FA_Q2 wrote:BECAUSE IT DERAILS THE ENTIRE TOPIC AND DOES NOT ALLOW SCUM HUNTING WHATSOEVER.
But that doesn't make it scummy, just annoying/frustrating
The arguments that have happened in this game happened while scum hunting and people defending their arguments. Nothing scummy about that. To say there is, is anti town
vote Mr. Anti town FAQ
You are scum looking to divide and conquer. Mislynch one Townie today, than Lynch the other under the guise of "one of these guys must be scum" when in fact the odds are pretty good boon Is probably town andvi know I am
This is pretty much what I have to say in response to FA. Scum aren't going to go out of their way to attack a person for three pages for the express purpose of making the game less readable. Those kinds of arguments arise from personality conflicts which are alignment-independent.
I'm also pretty ready for this day to be over. I feel like I've gotten what I want out of it and it's starting to drag on.-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
KK wrote:implosion is in the weak town because of a weird vibe that keeps him from being a full town read. Mostly it's the repeated motif where he has to constantly point out "scum-Khan could do that" which is weird that I'm the only one that gets this treatment. I had to look up if we had any game history and we've only ever been in one game together and I was town. If he could give me the reasoning behind this specific treatment I'd appreciate it, otherwise it feels a little like a "smear/discredit the townie" tactic.
I honestly might be giving you burden of proficiency to some degree. You're the only person I've played with at all in this player list (and you're an oldie), and it felt like people were jumping to conclusions very quickly over things that I thought an experienced player could easily say as scum. I do like your catchup post. I honestly am not sure what I was townreading dragonspawn off of. I think it was a gut town ping on 68 and some of his other early posts, and then since he was filed into the town pile I just completely ignored him since he was never saying anything of substance to look at. Like, I knew his vote was on me. And he has been consistently suspecting me, just not doing anything to try to convince anyone else or give any reasoning on it.
WRT Bulb: 928+929 feels genuine to me. It feels like a slightly panicky response that would come from town.
And @Anna, I disagree that there's no attempt to scumhunt in the posts you quoted. I think it's just hard to see because of his posting style.-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
In post 1003, Kublai Khan wrote:In post 998, Annarchy wrote:In post 994, Kublai Khan wrote:So that was fun. It looks like Bulbazoor has dramatically voted himself to L-2 status.
VOTE: FA_Q2
This is the direction I'd rather go for today.
did you read the part where bulba slipped
Yeah. I saw what you're talking about.
But Bulbazoor has been clumsily expressing himself all game. I don't think it's the slam dunk you're thinking it is.
Agreed with this. It's certainly suspicious but it's not a 100% kind of thing.
Bulb self-voting and saying he'd rather the day end in not a no-lynch is... strange, to say the absolute least, when there's 3 days until deadline and the thread is going berzerk.-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
In post 1019, Bulbazoor wrote:Hammer me but lynch yourself tomorrow.
I like this post. It's a very zen way of going out, written in iambic pentameter.
I'm going to be sad at bulb if this is a townflip.-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14451
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar