VOTE: SeshatX
Nice to meet you.
In post 27, Lowell wrote:ABR, get in here and help me kill some newbs.
In post 68, Killthestory wrote:Fuck this isn't following my town meta
Quick I need more votes on me, or I'll be scumread late game for not being pressured enough!
In post 137, Ollie wrote:In post 68, Killthestory wrote:
Quick I need more votes on me, or I'll be scumread late game for not being pressured enough!
In post 71, Killthestory wrote:Ocean if you don't vote for me I'm going to death tunnel you
In post 106, Killthestory wrote:God fucking dammit no one's voting me
In post 143, OceanWind wrote:So, re-reading everyone's ISO's, ...
ChurchOfMercy is probably my best bet for mafia right now. Very minimal posting with no serious content. I've followed I think two or three games by now containing Albert B. Rampage and he always has more passion as town.
...
In post 157, Lowell wrote:I'm starting to see the Ollie case, if for no other reason than his growing frustration that no one else is voting for obvtown killthestory like he wants us to. And yes, Ollie, I do normally sheep ABR. Because it's fun. You got a problem?
I have new leader now, though, and his name is killthestory. Obvtown. VOTE: CoM I tend to think team CoM would be having a little more fun were they down. I'm getting a bit of the deflated-after-receiving-scum-role vibe from them. Which I feel is especially pronounced in hydras.
In post 199, Ollie wrote:
Bloody, I thought I was seeing things with these two in the vote count. Inactive is an understatement.
In post 217, Imperium wrote:In post 143, OceanWind wrote:ChurchOfMercy is probably my best bet for mafia right now. Very minimal posting with no serious content. I've followed I think two or three games by now containing Albert B. Rampage and he always has more passion as town.
I agree with this.
Vote: ChurchOfMercy
I also disliked their blatant Lowell sheep + attacking you for offering a different viewpoint; it seems more likely to me that Klingon was just taking sides than actually reading Lowell's case as super-duper solid and your defense as scum defending scum; ABR's "I support Ollie and think he's town" also felt a little slimy to me, but that's far less significant than their lack of engagement in general.
In post 215, Imperium wrote:
This is a natural human tendency, which is probably why Church would make a move like this.
In post 237, Killthestory wrote:you're hoping for me to replace out because i've found your entire scum team
now stop bitching about my skills
In post 242, Killthestory wrote:Nice self meta scum, don't think that can help you here.
Nice discred scum, don't think that can help you here.
Nice AtE scum, don't think that can help you here.
Nice self read scum, don't think that can help you here.
In post 251, acryon wrote:Why is potentially being more interested in other ongoing games not as good of an excuse as being more interested in dating sites?
In post 250, Killthestory wrote:dude im literally too good.
church youre getting lynched today you scumlords
In post 251, acryon wrote:
In post 249, ChurchOfMercy wrote:Lack of engagement isn't scummy.
Hold on a second...
In post 243, ChurchOfMercy wrote:
Kain, on the other hand, has been pretty active elsewhere on the site today.
VOTE: KainTepesVOTE:
Why is potentially being more interested in other ongoing games not as good of an excuse as being more interested in dating sites?
In post 252, Lowell wrote:Just putting a marker down that KT is scum still. I know we moved on to more interesting players, but nothing he's done has made up for his ridiculous panic-flailing at getting his first vote. In fact all he's done is hide.
Also, scumvibes on bella. Very much looks like a player who just wants to look like s/he's interacting--asking and answering pointless questions.
In post 253, MagnaofIllusion wrote:
In post 244, ChurchOfMercy wrote:You guys, I'm known for being useless Day1, NAI. I'm more of a Day3 player.
Nope nope nope nope nope nope …
In post 243, ChurchOfMercy wrote:Kain, on the other hand, has been pretty active elsewhere on the site today.
VOTE: KainTepes
In post 246, ChurchOfMercy wrote:If you have skills, please start using them. This hydra isn't Scum.
Bellaphant probably is.
So lack of engagement with the game isn’t a scum-tell. Yet you are voting Kain solely on that factor since he hasn’t posted here.
And you are calling Bella scum while not voting for her …
VOTE: ChurchofMercyVOTE:
In post 250, Killthestory wrote:dude im literally too good.
church youre getting lynched today you scumlords
It would help if you’d vote for them again then Kill …
In post 262, Ollie wrote:In post 249, ChurchOfMercy wrote:Lack of engagement isn't scummy.
My attention is mostly focused on dating right now
Mafia is falling to the wayside
I will coordinate with Klingon in our PT and offer my thoughts and criticisms. If you all want to gang up on us before we get a footing, that's your right of course. You can win without us, I believe in you.
Albert
Big co-ordinated reads list of everyone please.
In post 267, OceanWind wrote:
In post 249, ChurchOfMercy wrote:Lack of engagement isn't scummy.
It's actually one of the most ridiculously accurate tells I've seen - a fairly significant percentage of mafia players tend to be much more active and involved as town than as mafia.
Saying "I'm useless D1" isn't an excuse. Everyone's reads get better as the game progresses but that doesn't mean we don't try on D1.
In post 271, Nosferatu wrote:What the hell is a backfoot?
In post 288, Nosferatu wrote:kill pls, you're only voting them because they haven't announced their scum reads
In post 289, Killthestory wrote:yes
In post 302, Severa wrote:Why are you voting Kain you complete weapon!?
In post 294, Killthestory wrote:oh man great scum list b r o
i rest my case here that i am the greatest scumhunter of all time
In post 312, Severa wrote:I am fine with a ChurchOfMercy lynch today.
I'm diffident about whether to read through for other scumreads as well before seeing the flip.
In post 316, ChurchOfMercy wrote:In post 312, Severa wrote:I am fine with a ChurchOfMercy lynch today.
I'm diffident about whether to read through for other scumreads as well before seeing the flip.
Yeah, nothing scummy about that little attitude.
It would be in your best interests to give some reason for your choice.
In post 347, Imperium wrote:I understand that you can occasionally be a low-volume poster Day 1 (I wouldn't call you useless). My problem with ABR not engaging on Day 1 is because I normally find Day 1 to be one of his most alignment indicative days; while I think that he typically is able to fake passion for a push pretty simply as scum, it's much harder for him to fake how he gets those reads and how he develops his picture of the game state, and, because he is an aggressive town player, he usually pushes to form a picture of the game on Day 1.
In post 349, Imperium wrote:Still catching up, but what's your read on jmo and would you be willing to help me push there?
In post 326, acryon wrote:In post 325, ChurchOfMercy wrote:DAY 1 READS
Acryon - Wants to lynch Kain but not really, sees himself as low-hanging fruit that never gets lynched D1, complains that he's being read so early in the game, yet reads others... Scum
Some serious false equivalency here.
In post 325, ChurchOfMercy wrote:Jim/(KainTepes) - Lurker/replace-out, no-content trollposter, Very interesting how much resistance there is to his wagon. Scum.
Maybe because there is no content to analyze? Is trollposting alignment-indicative? (Hint: it's not) Also, what made you think Imperium was scum initially? Because you moved pretty quickly from scum to simply based on meta it would appear.
In post 291, Bellaphant wrote:Words
What a shock that you show up with a reads list nearly identical to what everyone else is already saying. Have anything original to add?
In post 299, ChurchOfMercy wrote:In post 251, acryon wrote:
In post 249, ChurchOfMercy wrote:Lack of engagement isn't scummy.
Hold on a second...
In post 243, ChurchOfMercy wrote:
Kain, on the other hand, has been pretty active elsewhere on the site today.
VOTE: KainTepesVOTE:
Why is potentially being more interested in other ongoing games not as good of an excuse as being more interested in dating sites?
Because both of our heads posted here and Kain didn't.
Both our heads posted in other games as well.
I even posted on 2 other sites.
Apples and oranges.
Klingoncelt
So not being engaged isn't scummy as long as you've posted at least a couple times, even if the posts were essentially nothing. Funny how you draw the line in the perfect place for it to work in your favor.
Consider this an intent to put COM to L-1. Not going to actually do it since I've been dealing with a lot of quickhammers recently.
In post 328, Lowell wrote:I kind of feel like I... solved this game? CoM, bella, and KT. And CoM's "agreement" on bella doesn't do much for me, just looks like bussing.
In post 330, ChurchOfMercy wrote:We're actually scum. You've been right this entire time. We did what we could for the slot and you still caught us like a boss. You guys are really good players. I will be nomming for best town.
Klingon and I are very impressed by how effective this town's collective scumhunting ability is.
Well done.
I look forward to playing with you all again, hopefully on the same side.
Albert
In post 331, ChurchOfMercy wrote:It's just so hard to lie to you. How can we lie to your faces, we love you too much. No, we can't lie. We must be honest with you. You are terrific players. You are so close to solving the game.
If you keep us alive, we will periodically drop hints about who are partners are to reward you for being such incredible scumhunters.
Albert
In post 336, ChurchOfMercy wrote:That cutting commentary, though! It's like you have a window into my soul. I hope to never draw scum against you again, acryon.
Albert
In post 338, ChurchOfMercy wrote:It is incredibly telling! Yes. You are so right, I don't know what's left anymore.
Albert
In post 339, ChurchOfMercy wrote:I'm just so happy in my life, I care little about this game and I rather be lynched. Klingon, sorry! We did our best but they caught us.
Albert
In post 346, Jim wrote:
Your reaction being to vote someone who has not even showed up. The second, is that when you voted this slot you ignored the other slot that had yet to post altogether. The third, is that there has been no push whatsoever on me, yet you are stating there was some resistance to it? How can there be resistance to a non-existent push?
In post 347, Imperium wrote:
My big problem with your side of the hydra is mostly how you opened the game; why did you agree with Lowell's case on KTthecreeper?
In post 350, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Could people PLEASE stop using KT as an abbreviation? I understand Kain got replaced but there is still plenty of room for misunderstanding between Creeper and Killthestory IMO. Thanks!
In post 353, MagnaofIllusion wrote:
Null. He’s pretty much non-engaged. I don’t give any ‘dumb Town’ credit for 32-33 but it certainly doesn’t warrant scum-points either. I can see why, if he doesn’t know Lowell from Adam, Lowell’s call of me as Town early would be suspect. 62 is full of logical Town oriented thinking. His line of thinking in 179 and 206 about scum being in best position to call other players Town on little basis is a theory I believe in personally. Hell, if not for the fact that he is very non-engaged (other than going after Lowell and Killthestory) I’d probably be very comfortable with a fairly solid Town read on the slot.
In post 360, MagnaofIllusion wrote:In post 359, Imperium wrote:
What do you know of Klingon? I'd like your thoughts on the whole "Kain is scum for not showing up but low engagement is not a scum-tell" thing. Because that causes my alarm klaxons to go ringing big-time. Am I overthinking?