Newbie 1889: Ice Cream (Game Over)
-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
Thor, why do you want to put RC at L-2 so early in the game? Do you really believe that his vote for Reundo was serious rather than RVS?In post 18, Thor665 wrote:
According to whom?In post 16, UC Voyager wrote:aren't you supposed to be one of the best scumplayers on site???
I imagine some would agree with you and some would disagree with you.
I would suggest as the theory most experienced player there is probably a certain increased value to trying to sort me early, which I can see as a valuable strategic play.In post 16, UC Voyager wrote:Should we be afraid of the possibility of scum you?
Not sure why you'd be generically afraid though? Do you think you should be generically afraid of me more than anyone else? In pure statistics I am more likely to be town than scum, so therefore should you not be generically trusting of me? (I submit the answer to that question is clearly no - but then suggest your inverse of fear is also clearly no and wonder why you want me to debate it like a valid concern)
Want to put your vote on RCEnigma with me? I think I'd like to put him to three votes.-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
Please don’t misinterpret my question, Thor. I’m all about aggressively putting pressure on someone when it is warranted. But who do I want to lynchIn post 20, Thor665 wrote:
Just to spare myself typing up some things;In post 19, volxen wrote:Thor, why do you want to put RC at L-2 so early in the game? Do you really believe that his vote for Reundo was serious rather than RVS?
Why I want him at L-2 = https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?ti ... _Your_Vote
A quick thought about what I think of his, and my, early votes = https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?ti ... _be_Random
To spell out some very simplistic things aka tl:dr;
1. I want to put him at L-2 to see who will support me in that push and who will oppose me and to see how he responds, and depending on that series of interactions I will either want to lynch him, not lynch him, or perhaps investigate someone else while I debate, or want to keep hounding him for a while.
2. I think his vote was both RVS and serious at the same time - to think that anything is 100% random lies madness - my vote was also both RVS and deadly serious, considering I have no scum reads *stronger* than him right now why shouldn't I want to get him to L-2? Does sitting at L-3 help me more somehow?
Who would you like to lynch right now?
And if the answer is 'no one' I submit you are scum playing poorly or town who fails to understand that we can't catch scum without lynching someone, and that you're allowed to reassess your vote regularly if you find a read becoming weaker/stronger, yeah?right now? No oneyet, as there is not enough content in this game yet, in my opinion, to develop a solid scumread (or townread for that matter) on anyone.
I think you also read quite a lot into my question. I was legitimately asking you, in essence, if RC is a serious scumread for you, and if your vote for him was serious. You seem very eager to put pressure on him for what may have simply been a non-serious RVS joke vote for Reundo. I also disagree that a vote can’t be RVS, or at least non-serious. My vote for NotNova, for example, was a completely non-serious joke vote.
At this point I want to simply start gathering as much information as possible and get reads on people and understand their motivations. But in order to do that, the game needs more content. Once I start developing some reads, I will be more than happy to start pressuring my scumread(s).
But by all means, we can dig deeper into RC’s motivation behind his vote. I’m certainly not going to try and stop you from seeing how RC responds to your pressure, but I did want you to clarifywhyyou are pressuring him.
RC, are you seriously scumreading Reundo, or is your vote for him completely non-serious? Were you serious when you said that it would be worth it to take a gambit and lynch Reundo on the basis that he is too dangerous to keep alive if he is in fact scum based on the quality of his town game?-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
No one here is advocating taking it to the extreme that you mention (i.e., don’t talk or vote at all on day 1). But there also needs to be a reasonable amount of content before you can seriously start pushing someone towards a lynch and develop solid townreads and scumreads.In post 29, Thor665 wrote:My short reply is I find it really funny how people are putting me to L-1 because of not liking me wanting people at L-2.
Also, as a bookeeping thing - anyone who wants to hammer me (cast the final vote to lynch me) should state hammer intent and request a claim from me. That will give me time to claim my role for people to assess, and also time for anyone who isn't confident in lynching me to state as such, prove they are wimps and unvote
Spoiler: Wall replies
In any case, I would say we are officially out of RVS now, as you have placed a serious vote on RC, and RC and Reundo have placed serious votes on you.
As I said, my vote for NotNova was a pure RVS joke vote. Like it or not, it is how a lot of people start the game in the RVS stage.
But we are out of RVS now, so let’s keep things going. Are you scumreading Reundo Thor?-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
I’m up through post 94 so far.
Xwing, can you help me understand the trajectory of your gameplay so far? First in 27, you list both UC and Thor as “scum leans”, but then in the same post you also point out that you are sheeping Reundo and RC, which seems to suggest that you aren’t actually scumreading them for your own individual reasons and there really isn’t any confidence behind your reads. Then you vote for Thor in 27, but in 39 it sounds like you are almost starting to regret your vote on Thor – you said here, “im still leaving my vote parked on you for the above logic (paragraph 1)..i would have placed it at ucvoyagerbecause of his weird "vote" on you but i dont want to derail the current momentum.. “. You then doubled down on this reasoning again in 90 when you said, “so maybe i should have stuck with UCvoyager, but i didnt want to derail the momentum on you coz i was sure it would generate content”. You then unvoted Thor in this post, but, interestingly, you didn’t change your vote to UC. It comes across like you reallywantto vote for UC, but you are helpless to do so.
So my question is, if UC is the person you are the most suspicious of (which your ISO seems to suggest that is the case), why did you feel obligated to leave your vote parked on Thor for so long? You mentioned twice that you feared momentum would be lost if you had switched your vote from Thor to UC, but why did you believe that to be the case? Much of the posts in this thread so far consist of the back-and-forth between Thor and RC. I really don’t think you changing your vote from Thor to UC would have changed that or lessened the early game momentum that was started from Thor’s wagon.
If UC is the person you are the most suspicious of, you should be putting pressure on him to see how he reacts. The logical thing to do is to vote him and see if you can get others to follow suit to intensify the pressure and see how UC reacts. You could also start questioning him (beyond just asking him about the unvote vote thing). Why haven’t you done any of this?-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
I did see your initial explanation about what happened in your previous game, I just don't think it was a good reason for you to vote for Thor just because other people did, especially when it sounded like you really wanted to pressure UC rather than Thor. By "pressure" I mean that you could have started by voting for UC to get his attention, and then start asking him questions, which could have led to a back-and-forth dialogue between the two of you. This in-turn could have helped you to either solidify your initial scumread of him, or perhaps it would have convinced you that your initial read of him was wrong. But you instead voted for Thor just because other people were doing it and didn't put any pressure on the player that you said you wanted to pressure in two different posts (UC). That is what I find suspicious in your gameplay.In post 139, xwing wrote:
i believe i've already explained in my earlier posts and responses to the questions, but i'll repeat for you:In post 137, volxen wrote:I’m up through post 94 so far.
Xwing, can you help me understand the trajectory of your gameplay so far? First in 27, you list both UC and Thor as “scum leans”, but then in the same post you also point out that you are sheeping Reundo and RC, which seems to suggest that you aren’t actually scumreading them for your own individual reasons and there really isn’t any confidence behind your reads. Then you vote for Thor in 27, but in 39 it sounds like you are almost starting to regret your vote on Thor – you said here, “im still leaving my vote parked on you for the above logic (paragraph 1)..i would have placed it at ucvoyagerbecause of his weird "vote" on you but i dont want to derail the current momentum.. “. You then doubled down on this reasoning again in 90 when you said, “so maybe i should have stuck with UCvoyager, but i didnt want to derail the momentum on you coz i was sure it would generate content”. You then unvoted Thor in this post, but, interestingly, you didn’t change your vote to UC. It comes across like you reallywantto vote for UC, but you are helpless to do so.
So my question is, if UC is the person you are the most suspicious of (which your ISO seems to suggest that is the case), why did you feel obligated to leave your vote parked on Thor for so long? You mentioned twice that you feared momentum would be lost if you had switched your vote from Thor to UC, but why did you believe that to be the case? Much of the posts in this thread so far consist of the back-and-forth between Thor and RC. I really don’t think you changing your vote from Thor to UC would have changed that or lessened the early game momentum that was started from Thor’s wagon.
If UC is the person you are the most suspicious of, you should be putting pressure on him to see how he reacts. The logical thing to do is to vote him and see if you can get others to follow suit to intensify the pressure and see how UC reacts. You could also start questioning him (beyond just asking him about the unvote vote thing). Why haven’t you done any of this?
in my first game, town had a hard time reading my slot coz i played safe..so in this game i tried to stick out by voting on the wagon and putting thor at L-1..apparently as pointed out by most, that action was the opposite of what i wanted to do (e.g. it made me seem to hide behind majority instead of stick out coz i put him at L-1 like i was intending)..upon examination i admit that was a bad move on my part..at that time im not able to really defend my vote on thor coz i dont believe him to be scum, i just wanted to see how the interactions between the 3 "strongest" players were..it would be beneficial for town to sort out their alignments early..i thought it would derail momentum coz i put it at L-1, if you remove it then there's no real scare of being lynched (at that time, of course thor didnt know that, until he dissected me)..
obviously that time i thought it would derail the momentum if i removed the L-1 vote there..what i thought vs what you thought wont always be the same as we're different individuals..i removed my vote when i knew it was futile coz the pressure is already off after i told thor i essentially dont scum read him [paraphrased]..
yes we all know already that i had no confidence in that vote and i had no reasons for voting thor other than what i've said above..we already established that during my interaction with both thor and notnova (not sure which post but maybe you should finish reading everything first..)
what kind of pressure do you expect me to put on UC? have you read my rock solid case on him? (hmm maybe not yet but you will later..continue reading til the later pages).. i leaned scum on him on what..page 2..on why..his first post..do you think he will be pressured if i put my vote on him now? do you think others will be convinced and follow suit? honestly?
now it's more like im waiting for him to speak/address my question..when he comes back then i can engage with him more..
Also, I want to clarify something. In this post you said, "upon examination i admit that was a bad move on my part..at that time im not able to really defend my vote on thor cozi dont believe him to be scum, i just wanted to see how the interactions between the 3 "strongest" players were". Are you saying that Thor was NEVER a scumread for you, or that he initially was a scumread for you but you changed your mind about him? Because in post 27 you listed UC and Thor as your two scumleans:
In post 27, xwing wrote:
was this ever counted as a real vote? then subsequently counted as an unvote? if it was, im not feeling this..In post 16, UC Voyager wrote:ego
VOTE: ThorVOTE:
UNVOTE:
aren't you supposed to be one of the best scumplayers on site??? Should we be afraid of the possibility of scum you?
@thor: thanks for the explanations, just getting a bit of a feeling of defensiveness from your post about L-2..
i'm still new (2nd game) so im not sure what's the meta for L-1 so early into the game but i'll do it anyway..
i'm clearly sheeping reundo and RCE (for now, at least)
lean town: reundo, RCE, volxen (just from tone)
lean scum: ucvoyager, thor (explanations above)
null: all the rest
VOTE: thor
L-1-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
I think it's plausible that you could do what you did as either alignment, so you are still null for me at the moment. As town, it could be simply as you say it is, that you wanted to change up your gameplay from your last game so you intentionally sheeped onto the largest wagon right off the bat to "stand out". As scum, your motivation could have been to push for a Thor lynch, and/or to force a roleclaim out of Thor, especially if you and your scumbuddy suspected that he is a town power role. After all, since Thor is the IC, if he is town the argument could be made that he is the strongest town player among us and getting him lynched and/or forcing him to out himself as a town power role would be a strong start for the scumteam.In post 156, xwing wrote:
yes, the reasoning, game-wise, might not have been sound..but what did you think of my thought process and motivation behind it though? do you think of it as genuine/fake? town/scum motivated? easy/hard to follow?In post 153, volxen wrote: I did see your initial explanation about what happened in your previous game, I just don't think it was a good reason for you to vote for Thor just because other people did, especially when it sounded like you really wanted to pressure UC rather than Thor. By "pressure" I mean that you could have started by voting for UC to get his attention, and then start asking him questions, which could have led to a back-and-forth dialogue between the two of you. This in-turn could have helped you to either solidify your initial scumread of him, or perhaps it would have convinced you that your initial read of him was wrong. But you instead voted for Thor just because other people were doing it and didn't put any pressure on the player that you said you wanted to pressure in two different posts (UC). That is what I find suspicious in your gameplay.
Also, I want to clarify something. In this post you said, "upon examination i admit that was a bad move on my part..at that time im not able to really defend my vote on thor cozi dont believe him to be scum, i just wanted to see how the interactions between the 3 "strongest" players were". Are you saying that Thor was NEVER a scumread for you, or that he initially was a scumread for you but you changed your mind about him? Because in post 27 you listed UC and Thor as your two scumleans:
also, do we need to vote someone to get their attention, before asking questions? or is this more on game meta? coz personally even if i get tons of votes i dont really feel pressured at all (maybe coz i havent experienced drawing scum so i dunno..) i believe just directly engaging/asking the person would merit the same reaction..and if you've got enough info based on content and interactions (or lack thereof), then you can build a case then vote for them..that way, town can see your thought process and reasoning and join your vote if they are convinced..
do you have any scum reads at the moment, volxen?
to address your last point: during my L-1 vote on thor, i didnt have anything on him (null), i just wanted to see how their 3 interactions would go..
as of this writing, im treating the trio as town, though if there's scum in that pool, i will still choose thor..i've explained why in my previous posts..
For the time being I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt, as your responses to me so far haven't indicated to me that you necessarily have malicious intent with your voting (i.e., voting for Thor when you listed UC as your prime suspect). This is probably in part due to my experience in Newbie 1885 (link: viewtopic.php?f=11&t=77049), where I incorrectly scumread a relatively new player (Hugo) due to him unfortunately doing a series of things that unintentionally made him lookseriouslyscummy. I've learned from that game that new players will simply unintentionally do things that are suspicious, so for now you get the benefit of the doubt. But I will be keeping a close eye on your slot.
I don't have any strong scumreads yet, but I think I would like to get UC's attention. So:
VOTE: UCvoyager
UCvoyager is now at L-1-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
In post 182, RCEnigma wrote:I'll say that Volxen was much more active in his last game. To Nova I'll say that his walls are playstyle indicative not alignment indicative. He gets a lot out in his posts and similar to me is probably prone to tunnels.Probablyprone to tunnels? In Newbie 1885 I incorrectly tunneled on Swims the whole game, lol. I'm trying to break that bad habit, though.-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
Nova, is there a particular reason why you singled me out compared to the other players with low-content? In 115 you voted for me and called me out after I had made a post (101) indicating that I was in the process of getting caught up in the thread. You called me out for lurking, but you didn’t call anyone else out and it came across like the only reason why it bothered you is because I made that post before I would have gotten prodded, as opposed to making it after I got prodded. In the very next post in the thread, 116, UC made a similar “I need to get caught up” post, but it didn’t phase you at all. Literally the only difference between my “I need to get caught up” post and UC’s “I need to get caught up” post is that I made mine before I would have gotten prodded, and he made his after he got prodded. Also, at the time you made 115, Horrordude only had two posts (6 and 72), one of which was his RVS vote and the other being his “I need to catch up” post. UC also had only two posts (16 and 52) at the time you made 115, and again here one of his posts was a unvote/vote and the other was a “I need to catch up post”. I, on the other hand, had 5 posts (17, 19, 21, 40, and 101) at the time you made 115, and 3 out of those 5 posts contained serious game-related content. The fact of the matter is that I had more game-related content than both Horror and UCcombinedat the time you made 115, but out of us three “lurkers” theONLYthing that stuck out to you was the fact that I made my “I’m getting caught up” post before getting prodded as opposed to making it after getting prodded? Seriously?
If you had equally called all three of us out in 115 for having low-content, that would have been one thing. But you completely ignored UC’s and Horror’s own lack of content and hammered down on me solely because of the timing of my “I’m getting caught up” post. And then in 179, you continued to double down on me while still basically ignoring UC’s lack of content (you briefly name dropped him here but that was it). And here you also praised Horror for making a catch-up post, while downplaying my exchange with and questioning of xwing, as if that’s somehow not legitimate game-related content.
If your case against me is that I am more likely to be scum compared to the other low-content posters because of the timing of my “I’m getting caught up” post, then, to quote Reundo, I would say your case is pretty damn “flim flam”.-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
@NotNova, 214 is a long post which basically says
1-) That you think I am scum because of the timing of my “I’m getting caught up” 101 post
2-) That you didn’t like my questioning of xwing
Look, I don’t know what to tell you other than you are reading way too much into my “I’m getting caught up” post in 101. Do you want to know why I made it? Because I was busy IRL and I wanted everyone to know that I was still here. You are acting like prod dodging somehow fits into my overall larger master scum plan. As if getting prodded is somehow noble and really pro-town. And I would think you of all people would have at least considered the possibility that maybe I was in fact just busy IRL, considering you had two days in-between 115 and your next post 160, and you indicated in 160 that you were busy IRL and that was the reasoning behind the gap in your posts. So why immediately jump to the conclusion that the timing of my 101 is scum-motivated, instead of considering that it’s simply what it looks like, a completely NAI post indicating that I got busy IRL but was in the process of getting caught up? Because that’s apparently how you treated UC’s own “I’m getting caught up” post in 116, since you never referred to it or criticized it.
That’s what I find unreasonable in your logic. In 115 you hone down on me, even though I had more content that both UC and Horror combined at the time and come to the conclusion that I am more likely to be scum than either of them because of the timing of 101. And that literally was the only distinguishing factor between me vs Horror/UC. I guess if I had made 101 after getting prodded rather than before, we wouldn’t even be having this conversation, as the timing of the post is the basis of you honing down on me.
Regarding my questioning of xwing, I’m not really sure why you take issue with it. I genuinely found the disconnect between him stating UC was his top scumread but voting for Thor because others were doing it to be suspicious, so I questioned him to dig deeper into the issue and see how he would respond so I could gather more information. It seems like you’re almost trying to suggest that because my questioning of him didn’t lead to me necessarily scumreading and voting him, that it was a waste of time. If that is the case you are making, then I would argue that you are missing the entire point of what this game is all about. Questioning people and uncovering their motivations is literally what the game of Mafia is all about. Questioning someone does not always have to result in voting for them or scumreading them. I questioned him to gather more information, and I found his responses to be plausible coming from a town perspective (i.e., that he is a new player that wanted to stand out more, and he thought he could achieve that by sheeping onto the largest wagon), so I gave him the benefit of the doubt for the time being. What is unreasonable about any of that?
Now that that’s out of the way, I would like to actually start addressing other things here. To start, RCEnigma is a townread for me, and I will elaborate more in my next post.
I’m not sure yet on Reundo and Thor. I probably need to ISO both of them some more and re-read through their arguments/discussions. I think it’s entirely possible that the 3-way arguments involving {Thor, Reundo, RCEnigma} are TvTvT. I need to analyze Reundo and Thor more to see if anything sticks out to me as potentially scum-motivated.
NotNova, if you are town, then I would encourage you to keep a more open mind about my slot. Just as I am trying to keep an open mind about your slot, as I do think it’s possible that you are just misguided about me and I can see town!NotNova being genuinely fed up with lurkers, and it is a fair argument to suggest that scum could be residing within lurkers. I do find your focus on me over the other lurkers with less content to be illogical, but I still think it’s entirely possible that you are town and are simply misreading me. Besides myself, who is your next strongest scumread?-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
I think it is very likely that there is at least one member of the scumteam among {NotNova, xwing, Ceejay[UCvoyager], and Angel}.
NotNova – I’ve already said why I suspect him. He has talked about how “fed up” he is with lurkers (see: 214), but the only slot he really has been critical of out of {Volxen, Sky[Horror], CeeJay[UC]} is mine. He basically gave Sky[Horror] a free pass just because he wrote a catch-up post (while simultaneously criticizing me for my legitimate questioning of xwing), and for whatever reason he has all but completely ignored CeeJay[UC]’s slot. UC himself really didn’t have any content in this game, and his replacement CeeJay hasn’t done much but accuse me of being scum because I was on his predecessors’ wagon (now his wagon). NotNova simply doesn’t seem to care about the lurking from Ceejay[UC]’s slot. NotNova likes to keep bringing up the fact that I didn’t have a complete readslist early on in the game (which is true), but did Sky[Horror] and Ceejay[UC] have them? No, they did not, but that doesn’t really seem to concern NotNova at all. All three of our slots have had periods of inactivity/lurking in this game, but I am the only one he is interested in questioning and pressuring.
If NotNova were town, I think he would be more inclined to equally pressure/question all three of myself, Sky[Horror], and Ceejay[UC] for our periods of inactivity/lurking. Obviously, he can only vote for one of us at a time, but he still could have made an effort to question/pressure Sky[Horror] and Ceejay[UC], but he didn’t. He pays lip service to being fed up with lurking, but then he hard tunnels all of his focus on the one out of us three who has had the most content in this game: myself. That suggests to me that he may be pushing an agenda rather than legitimately trying to scum-hunt amongst the slots that have less content in this game. If he is scum, perhaps it is because one of the other lurker slots is his partner (Sky[Horror], Ceejay[UC], or even Angel). And in 214 and 217 he sounds like he is just more interested in establishing associatives than in actually lynching scum. Why is the guy that is supposedly so “fed up” with lurking adamantly opposed to lynching the slot that? NotNova’s words and actions are just contradictory.literally has zero content
Xwing – I’ve already talked about xwing as well. I do find his early game behavior of voting for Thor while listing UC as his prime scum suspect (and his reasoning for doing so) to be suspicious. And then in 233, he writes a lengthy post on why he is voting for me, but his reasons for voting me are basically the same exact reasons that NotNova listed for voting me: 1) he didn’t like the fact that I had a period of inactivity that was followed by my “I’m getting caught up” post in 101 and 2) he didn’t like that I questioned him about his voting for Thor. He then goes on to compare his vote for Thor to my original vote for NotNova, even though he knows that my original vote for NotNova was a non-serious RVS vote (because I didn’t have any serious scumreads at the time that I voted for NotNova, see: 17), whereas at the time he voted for Thor he had a scumread (UC) that he neglected to vote for. He also keeps justifying his behavior in this game based on what happened in a previous game: 1) first he uses it to justify his voting for Thor (“I want to stand out unlike my last game”), and 2) second he uses it in part to justify voting for me (“in my last game one of the people that attacked me turned out to be scum”). Overall that’s just faulty reasoning as this is a completely different game with different people and different circumstances.
Ceejay[UC] – His predecessor UC didn’t really have much content, and the first thing Ceejay did when he joined the game was accuse me of being scum (see: 207). Interestingly, he was fine with the other three people being on his wagon (Thor, Sky[Horror], and xwing), and it was only my being on his wagon that he took issue with (see: 212). I feel like that was a very easy play to make, because I had already taken heat for inactivity/lurking (mostly from NotNova), and out of the four people on his wagon I was the easiest target for him to attack. In essence, he basically just agreed with NotNova’s case against me. And out of the 200+ posts that this game currently has, the only thing that seems to have stuck out to him is the fact that I was on his predecessors’ wagon (now his wagon), even when I made it clear that I voted for UC primarily to get his attention (see: 183).
Angel – I don’t really have much to say here as there is literally no content from this slot. But as Reundo said, multiple people have replaced out of this slot, which may suggest a higher likelihood of it being a scum slot.-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
Do you still have intent to hammer me?In post 272, Skygazer wrote:CJ wagon is not the worst due to early UC posts actually-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
@RCEnigma,
I’m not seeing what is so grounded about NotNova’s case against me. He really brought up two valid points against me:
1) That I didn’t have an early game reads list
2) That I had a period of inactivity
And those two things are equally applicable to all of the other lurker slots: Ceejay[UC], Sky[Horror], and Angel. But it’s as if he is holding me to a different standard than everyone else, because he has chosen to ignore the other lurker slots rather than taking the more equitable approach of presenting cases against all four of us.
If his theory is that it is very likely that one or even both members of the scumteam are among the lurkers, then how is it possibly the most logical approach to tunnel on one out of those four slots and completely ignore the other three? Even if he suspects me the most, should he not have made an effort to engage and question/pressure the other three lurker slots? Admittedly in the case of Angel this would be impossible since that slot has not checked in, but he has had ample opportunities to start seriously engaging/questioning/pressuring the Sky[Horror] and CeeJay[UC] slots. Especially in the case of Ceejay, who has been UC’s replacement for a while now, yet he has made no effort engage, question, or pressure him. In 260, he basically says that the best usage of his limited time to is death tunnel on my slot and ignore all of the other lurker slots because he doesn’t have an unlimited amount of time to devote to this game (as if any of us do).
For example, in 70 he asks me for a readslist. Why has he not asked the same of the Sky[Horror] and Ceejay[UC] slots? This is one of his two major points against me, yet he is unwilling to be equally critical of their slots for not having early game readslists.
His lynch pool also seems to be {Volxen, Volxen, Volxen, and more Volxen}. I haven’t seen him list the name of anyone else that he would seriously consider lynching. And we are on day 1 of a nine-player game that has two scum slots. And I seriously doubt anyone has uncovered the exact scum team, so at this point in time wouldn’t it be reasonable to expect NotNova to have at least 3 serious scumreads anyways? The only two people he has mentioned as scumreads are myself and xwing, and in 223, he said that xwing is “far below Volxen” on his list of scumreads, so I’m not even sure at this point how serious of a scumread xwing is for him.
Meanwhile, while it did come late, I did clearly list four scumreads in 258. To be more specific, this is how I am currently sorting everyone:
Town: {RCEnigma, Reundo, Thor}. Out of these three I feel the most confident about RC being town, but I really suspect that Reundo and Thor are both town as well. If either Reundo or Thor are scum they are doing an incredibly good job of covering up their agenda, because nothing in their interactions (with each other as well as with everyone else) or individual ISO’s stands out to me as being likely to be scum motivated.
Null: {Sky[Horror]}. This slot would be a scumread for me if Horror hadn’t made that catch-up post in 155, which was a fairly decent catch-up post. I still think it’s possible that the Sky[Horror] slot could be scum, but I think scum is much more likely to be residing among {NotNova, xwing, Ceejay[UC], and Angel}. For now the Sky[Horror] slot is null until I see more content from Sky.
Scum: {NotNova, xwing, Ceejay[UC], and Angel}. I already talked about these four slots in 258.
Ironically, even though he does have a lot more content than I did in the beginning of the game, I am currently taking a much more holistic and open-minded approach to this game than he is. He is insistent on death tunneling me, whereas I have shared a total of four scumreads, any of whom I would be OK with lynching. To be perfectly clear, that means my lynch pool is {NotNova, xwing, Ceejay[UC], and Angel}. I wouldn’t be adamantly opposed to a Sky[Horror] lynch, but I believe that any of my four scumreads would be a better lynch.
One of my biggest concerns regarding NotNova is that if he is in fact town, he is setting himself up to look unnecessarily scummy with my mislynch (if I am lynched on day 1) going into day 2. Let me put it this way:
Scenario 1:
A = NotNova death tunnels Volxen
B = NotNova ignores the other lurker slots (Sky[Horror], Ceejay[UC], and Angel)
C = Volxen is mislynched day 1
D = scumteam has a much easier time scumpainting NotNova on day 2
A+B+C=D
If I am mislynched on day 1, NotNova is undoubtedly going to take heat for my mislynch, because it is a wagon that he has started, and he has been very forcefully pushing for me to be lynched today. Xwing has also tunneled on me to some extent lately, but no one else on my wagon has been death tunneling me the way NotNova has been. He has been death tunneling me and ignoring the other lurker slots, period. So if I am mislynched and flip town, it’s not exactly going to be hard for the scumteam to start making the argument that NotNova was pushing a scum agenda with my mislynch (and possibly push for NotNova own mislynch on day 2). They could make similar arguments to what I have been making – that he has been highly inconsistent in his push against me while completely ignoring the other lurker slots. The difference is that at that point I would be confirmed town, so the point about him being inconsistent becomes even more valid. And his whole theory that scum is likely to be among the lurkers won’t be a valid defense for him to fall back on, because of his singular focus on only one out of the four lurker slots (and the one with the most content out of the four to boot).
Scenario 2:
A= NotNova equally focuses on all four lurker slots (Volxen, Sky[Horror], Ceejay[UC], and Angel)
B = Volxen happens to be one out of the four lurker slots that is chosen to be lynched
C= Volxen is mislynched day 1
D= scumteam has a much harder time scumpainting NotNova on day 2
A+B+C=D
If thiswerethe case, this would be the much better scenario for NotNova going into day 2, because it’s going to be more difficult for the scumteam to scumpaint paint him (and push for his mislynch on day 2) if he were equally pressuring all four of (Volxen, Sky[Horror], Ceejay[UC], and Angel) and I just happened to be the one that was lynched. He could defend himself by falling back on his theory that scum is likely to be among the lurkers (Volxen, Sky[Horror], Ceejay[UC], and Angel). It then becomes harder for the scumteam to suggest that NotNova was pushing a scum agenda, because they have to attack his entire premise (that scum are more likely to be among the lurkers) in order to do that.
The problem is that scenario 1 is the current reality. His lynch pool should in theory be {Volxen, xwing, Sky[horror], Ceejay[UC], and Angel}: all of the lurkers plus xwing, since xwing is apparently still a scumread for him. But the only person he has any interest in lynching is me.
Either he has an incredibly narrow-minded and short-sighted town game for day 1 (death tunnel one suspect and ignore all of the other lurker slots) or he is simply scum. If he is town, I would encourage him to start taking a more holistic and open-minded approach to this game so that his death tunneling of me cannot be used against him by the scumteam. Because believe it or not, the most important thing to me is that town wins this game. Of course, I don’t want to be mislynched, but what would be worse than my mislynch is if my mislynch is followed by NotNova himself getting mislynched on day 2 because he inadvertently makes himself look scummy with how hard he death tunneled on me to the exclusion of all else on day 1.
Seriously @NotNova, you need to start taking a more holistic and open-minded view of the game, and you need to start doing that now. Yes, I get it I am your top suspect, but you are aware that there are two scum slots in this game, and you are also not 100% confident of your scumread of me. At this point in the game you should, at a minimum, have 3 serious scumreads, and you should be willing to vote for any of them.-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
Because the one person I am 100% certain of being town is myself. My win condition requires all scum to be lynched, and I know for a fact that I am not scum, so me being mislynched does not help me meet my win condition. So don't I have an obligation to defend myself to the best of my abilities, as opposed to sitting back and just accepting my mislynch? I'm not really sure what point you are trying to drive home here.In post 295, Haylen wrote:I want to keep Thor around, I wont be voting there today. Why are we even discussing his reputation in a newbie game, it's irrelevant.
RCEnigma, run down on why you're voting for my slot?
Volxen, why are you so concerned about a mislynch on Day One? You're pushing the 'lynching me will be a mislynch' thing rather heavily.
Ruendo, replace outs aren't a tell this early in the game. Using your argument that lurkers are anti-town, I'd go as far as to say replacing out was neutral behaviour. Scum lurk to avoid the radar, they wouldn't lurk so much that it would get their slot replaced out.
I haven't read the thread properly yet, that is just be notes on a few points made on this page.
Hi everybody, it's been about 3-4 years since I last played, so bare with me and I'm sure we can sort everything out.-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
The answer is yes, I think it's entirely possible that scum!Nova could lead the charge against me, even though it's a bit of a risky play (as opposed to letting someone else take the charge as you suggest). If he is scum I don't know exactly what his plan going into day 2 will be assuming I am mislynched on day 1, but it would probably involve deflecting the blame at some of the more suspicious players on my wagon, such as xwing and especially Ceejay[UC]. Ceejay[UC] in particular would be an easy target for NotNova to attack, considering Ceejay didn't exactly articulate a good reason for being on my wagon (he voted me because I was on his wagon, even though he had three other people on his wagon that he has ignored). Or maybe he would start doubling down on xwing, who was his original scumread. In fact, interestingly in 287 NotNova said the following about xwing:In post 286, RCEnigma wrote:So let me ask you this Volxen, do you see Scum!Nova tunneling you to a lynch only for it to flip town and implicate himself heavily? As opposed to keeping his lynch options open for perhaps a Townie to lead the charge that he started.
Polarized: xwing (if you flip scum, cleared town, otherwise a scumlean)
So it seems his read of xwing is contingent on how I flip. I find it a bit interesting that he's not willing to commit on xwing until he sees my flip. If I flip scum, that apparently means xwing is cleared as town, but if I flip town, then xwing is back to being a scumread for him again. So maybe he makes the case that there has to be at least one scum among {Volxen, xwing}, and then pushes for xwing's mislynch on day 2 (assuming nova is scum and xwing is town) after my mislynch on day 1.-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
Because it's important to be transparent about things like that.In post 305, xwing wrote:
that would be you, then angel (mostly for the twice flaked, which i admit is quite weak)..In post 304, volxen wrote:@xwing, who all is in your lynch pool?
im gonna look at ceej and sky more as well (in that order)..
any reason you asked?-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
Good, I'm glad that I have your attention since there has been very little content from your slot. You can start by sharing any townreads, nullreads, and scumreads that you have. Also, who all is in your lynch pool?In post 337, ceejayvinoya wrote:
Do tell me, do you think voting a lurker increases the chances of a lurker posting?In post 258, volxen wrote: Ceejay[UC] – His predecessor UC didn’t really have much content, and the first thing Ceejay did when he joined the game was accuse me of being scum (see: 207). Interestingly, he was fine with the other three people being on his wagon (Thor, Sky[Horror], and xwing), and it was only my being on his wagon that he took issue with (see: 212). I feel like that was a very easy play to make, because I had already taken heat for inactivity/lurking (mostly from NotNova), and out of the four people on his wagon I was the easiest target for him to attack. In essence, he basically just agreed with NotNova’s case against me. And out of the 200+ posts that this game currently has, the only thing that seems to have stuck out to him is the fact that I was on his predecessors’ wagon (now his wagon), even when I made it clear that I voted for UC primarily to get his attention (see: 183).
Now that you have my attention, what do you wanna do with it?-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
My only completed game is Newbie 1885 (I was town in it). Here is a link to it: viewtopic.php?f=11&t=77049In post 341, ceejayvinoya wrote:@Volxen do you have a previous game that I can parse? Or is this your first?
What are you having trouble understanding about me?In post 340, ceejayvinoya wrote:My problem right now is that I really don't understand Volxen. Sigh.-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
@Reundo, in 360 you said, "I'd be much more content lynching volxen than ceejay today". Can you explain why you find Ceejay towny then? He hasn't done much besides immediately vote for me and accuse me of being scum upon his entrance to the game, and his reasoning was simply because I was on his predecessors’ wagon, which became his wagon.
Here is the post where I voted for UC:
Since there seems to be confusion on this, I meant it when I said that I voted for UC to get his attention. Not because I wanted to lynch him at the time. UC himself was really null for me, because he didn't do much besides... lurk. But then Ceejay joins the game, and he immediately votes for me and accuses me of being scum, while simultaneously clearing the other three people on his wagon (Thor, Sky[Horror], xwing)..... because reasons? In 207 Ceejay says in reference to me, "Does he think his vote would drag a lurker into the thread? I feel that his vote on my slot at that point was opportunistic and not really town motivated."In post 183, volxen wrote:
I think it's plausible that you could do what you did as either alignment, so you are still null for me at the moment. As town, it could be simply as you say it is, that you wanted to change up your gameplay from your last game so you intentionally sheeped onto the largest wagon right off the bat to "stand out". As scum, your motivation could have been to push for a Thor lynch, and/or to force a roleclaim out of Thor, especially if you and your scumbuddy suspected that he is a town power role. After all, since Thor is the IC, if he is town the argument could be made that he is the strongest town player among us and getting him lynched and/or forcing him to out himself as a town power role would be a strong start for the scumteam.In post 156, xwing wrote:
yes, the reasoning, game-wise, might not have been sound..but what did you think of my thought process and motivation behind it though? do you think of it as genuine/fake? town/scum motivated? easy/hard to follow?In post 153, volxen wrote: I did see your initial explanation about what happened in your previous game, I just don't think it was a good reason for you to vote for Thor just because other people did, especially when it sounded like you really wanted to pressure UC rather than Thor. By "pressure" I mean that you could have started by voting for UC to get his attention, and then start asking him questions, which could have led to a back-and-forth dialogue between the two of you. This in-turn could have helped you to either solidify your initial scumread of him, or perhaps it would have convinced you that your initial read of him was wrong. But you instead voted for Thor just because other people were doing it and didn't put any pressure on the player that you said you wanted to pressure in two different posts (UC). That is what I find suspicious in your gameplay.
Also, I want to clarify something. In this post you said, "upon examination i admit that was a bad move on my part..at that time im not able to really defend my vote on thor cozi dont believe him to be scum, i just wanted to see how the interactions between the 3 "strongest" players were". Are you saying that Thor was NEVER a scumread for you, or that he initially was a scumread for you but you changed your mind about him? Because in post 27 you listed UC and Thor as your two scumleans:
also, do we need to vote someone to get their attention, before asking questions? or is this more on game meta? coz personally even if i get tons of votes i dont really feel pressured at all (maybe coz i havent experienced drawing scum so i dunno..) i believe just directly engaging/asking the person would merit the same reaction..and if you've got enough info based on content and interactions (or lack thereof), then you can build a case then vote for them..that way, town can see your thought process and reasoning and join your vote if they are convinced..
do you have any scum reads at the moment, volxen?
to address your last point: during my L-1 vote on thor, i didnt have anything on him (null), i just wanted to see how their 3 interactions would go..
as of this writing, im treating the trio as town, though if there's scum in that pool, i will still choose thor..i've explained why in my previous posts..
For the time being I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt, as your responses to me so far haven't indicated to me that you necessarily have malicious intent with your voting (i.e., voting for Thor when you listed UC as your prime suspect). This is probably in part due to my experience in Newbie 1885 (link: viewtopic.php?f=11&t=77049), where I incorrectly scumread a relatively new player (Hugo) due to him unfortunately doing a series of things that unintentionally made him lookseriouslyscummy. I've learned from that game that new players will simply unintentionally do things that are suspicious, so for now you get the benefit of the doubt. But I will be keeping a close eye on your slot.
I don't have any strong scumreads yet,. So:but I think I would like to get UC's attention
VOTE: UCvoyager
UCvoyager is now at L-1
I'm not sure why Ceejay would find the prospect of voting for a lurker to get their attention to be such a shocking concept, and why he would make the assumption that it's necessarily indicative of scum-motivation (if it's pro-town to lynch lurkers that aren't contributing, then why is it suddenly scummy to vote for a lurker merely to get their attention?). It's entirely valid to vote for someone to get their attention and/or pressure them, even if you are not ready yet to lynch them at the time of the vote. Even if he has only skimmed through the thread and skimmed through his predecessors ISO, he would quickly realize that his predecessor UC didn't really do much of anything. But no, out of the 200+ posts that were in this game upon his joining in, he immediately latches onto my wagon and accuses me of being scum and doesn't really comment on much of anything else. And his only reasoning for scumreading me is because he doesn't like the fact that I voted for a lurker's slot to get their attention.
Also, I find it a bit curious, given how much of an issue Ceejay has with my voting of his slot, that he hasn't questioned the other two people that were on his wagon (Thor and xwing) as to why they were voting for his slot (I’m not including Horror here since he replaced out). As far as I can tell, Thor voted for UC for reasons similar to my own reasons for voting for UC.
Here is the post where Thor voted for UC:
And when asked by xwing about his vote for UC, Thor explained it in this post:In post 143, Thor665 wrote:
Okay.In post 138, xwing wrote:
i'm not ignoring your slot per se, i'm ignoring you at the moment..there's plenty of back and forth with you and the others already and i believe there's even more content to come..In post 133, Thor665 wrote:@Xwing - how do you see ignoring my slot to help you win the game?
How does "ignoring me for some period of time yet to be declared" help you win?
I feel it won't.
Unvote: RCEnigma
Vote: UCVoyager
RCE is starting to convince me he might be town. Let's lynch UCVoyager. (as a disclaimer for Reundo - though I do say 'let's lynch' which *could* mean 'immediately, like in the next 20 minutes' my lack of inclusion of timing does not actually clarify this as my goal, the better way to read this is 'let's lynch him in a general sense insomuch as I read him as scum, but I understand that other votes might take a bit of time to gather here, and I also appreciate the use of hammer intent and claim time for people to assess the wagon - and though I would like to see proactive advancement of that end goal within a short time, frankly within 48 hours having a hammer intent would please me immensely, it is not a statement that we must do it all immediately )
Thor can correct me if I’m wrong, but I’m getting the impression Thor’s vote for UC here very much had to do with the fact that UC was lurking and not contributing. In other words, he and I voted for UC for similar reasons. The main difference is that Thor was willing to commit to lynching UC at the time of his vote, whereas my vote was more about pressuring UC and getting his attention, in hopes of drawing him out from his lurking and to see how he would respond to being at L-1. But Ceejay is A-OK with Thor’s vote on his slot, but my vote for his slot is scummy, even though we both voted for UC for similar, if not exactly the same, reasons? How does that make any sense whatsoever?In post 145, Thor665 wrote:
Wow - I'm sorry reading my posts is that painful to you.In post 144, xwing wrote:@thor: it keeps me motivated to play the game..
Frankly though, if you're town aren't you basically game throwing right now and being a jerk to all your fellow town team by not bothering to read posts to help catch a scum member or figure out a town member?
In post 144, xwing wrote:how exactly were you convinced of RCE's towniness?[/quote[
To clarify - I said starting to convince, not convinced.
For me the basic evidence is he doesn't appear to have a plan. Being lost tends to be a thing town are more comfortable with. Compare/contrast with Reundo who, even though he is admitting half his case on me might be wrong, is also still voting me and is ignoring that 2 players who were voting me are agreeing they had flawed reasoning while Reundo is attacking me for calling out flawed reasoning being used to vote me. If he's town, he's absolutely tunneled and not helpful. If he's scum - he's probably scared that admitting he was wrong and actually doing something different would 'look scummy' so he's digging in hard to avoid it. Either way it's not town minded. RCE is using terrible logic, but at least he seems generally interested to toss out a lot of town reads and also to (weakly) poke at new avenues. Makes it look like he might legit be trying to solve the game.
In post 144, xwing wrote:why is UC scum for you?At this point - being purely unhelpful to town paired with not posting. If we can't sort him we might as well flip him because I wouldn't want him in lylo if this is how he'll be playing the rest of the game.
Want to vote him with me?
If nothing else it will allow someone to freak out that I'm asking for support on a wagon again.
And here is the post where xwing voted for UC:
So again, a vote for UC’s slot that was at least in part due to his inactivity/lurking. And again, Ceejay is A-OK with xwings vote on his slot as well…. It’s only my vote on his slot that he takes issue with. Even though all three of us voted for his slot because of inactivity/lurking. Makes perfect sense.In post 173, xwing wrote:@horror: even if im not convinced yet on vote usage, it's been noted by most people to be suspicious, so i concede that point for now and will be voting in this post..
[shockingly] i agree with thor that time's not enough..in my first game we adopted a mob lynch mentality on D1 simply coz we didnt have time to switch and ended up mislynching a townie who didnt defend himself well..i also agree that among the inactives,..horror has already posted content, angel has just replaced (so the two others before really flaked)..UC seems most suspect coz of the nature of his prodges
regarding my take on the inactives, i think we should be a bit wary in speculating their alignment, since in my first game, the two inactives were actually PR roles..whereas in reundo's, they were scum..all im saying is we can speculate but we shouldn't put too much importance on it..we wont know until they actively join the game..
VOTE: UCvoyager
So ironically, my vote for UC’s slot was initially about merely trying to get UC’s attention, but Ceejay himself tipped his slot from a nullread to a scumread for me with his entrance to the game and his illogical stance that my vote, and only my vote, for him is scummy even when at least two of the other people on his wagon (Thor and xwing) voted for his slot for similar reasons.
This is why I have been content to keep my vote on Ceejay, as he is now in fact a full-blown scumread for me. But as I made clear in 284, I do have other people in my lynch pool that I am willing to vote for as well.-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
Also, I am not simultaneously scumreading and townreading NotNova in 284. I think I made it pretty clear that he is a scumread for me in that post as well as 258. But I am not 100% certain of him being scum, and on the off-chance that he is just misguided town that is horrifically misreading me, I was expressing a genuine concern of him inadvertently drawing suspicion to himself in the event that I am mislynched today. Because unlike everyone else on my wagon, he is the only one that has been hardcore death tunneling on me.-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
Ceejay's "reasoning" in 212 for singling me out of all of the people on his wagon is illogical. He also said in that post that my "apparent lack of sorting" was scummy, but then I sorted everyone in the game in 284, which he never acknowledged in any of his subsequent posts. And it is quite ironic that he would even make that comment in the first place, as Ceejay himself has yet to sort the vast majority of the people in this game. Most of his content has been accusing me of being scum, voting for me, and expressing supposed frustration at "not understanding" me.In post 382, xwing wrote:okay first off, im happy you're posting..
next..have you read reundo and ceejay's exchange in 212? what do you think of ceejay's reasoning there? do you think it does not answer part of your argument?
can you rank your scum reads in order from most scummy to least scummy?
im assuming ceejay first, then?
I would currently rank my scumreads from most scummy to least scummy as follows:
1. NotNova
2. Ceejay[UC]
3. Xwing
4. Haylen[Angel]-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
So... does anyone have the intention to hammer me? We are a little bit under 15 hours away from the deadline, and I am at work until later in the evening. I will be around in the evening for the last 4 or so hours before the deadline, but I want to make sure I have a chance to respond before getting hammered, in the event that someone places intent to hammer me.-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
Very well, then I have no choice but to make a full role claim.
My role is. During each night phase I am able to target one player. The player that I target is protected from being night killed and is prevented from using their own night action, if they have one. I am not able to target myself.Town Jailkeeper-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
I'm kind of torn... I really was initially scumreading Haylen's slot just because of the fact that three people replaced out of this slot (and for what it's worth, Angel joined another game after replacing out of this one...).
However, I do find these recent posts of Haylen's to be possibly scum-motivated:
In post 386, Haylen wrote:
Woah Woah Woah. What the heck is this? Smells like a setup to a fake claim to me. No townie would hint so heavily bout being a power role on Day One with little so pressure.In post 366, NotNova wrote:Also @Thor — can I ask you in advance for an IC-hat guide on Day 2 on how PRs should act? Thanks.
As for my comments and lack of reads, as I said I haven't played in 3 years and I'm still finding my feet. I also have a distain for Day One. You're seeing me gather my thoughts. I'm just trying to keep things short and sweet because this game is already heavy on the text walls.In post 388, Haylen wrote:
Stop deflecting, you brought it up yourself. Anti-Town is advertising that you may have a power role to the game on day one when you aren't under pressure.In post 387, NotNova wrote:In post 386, Haylen wrote:
Woah Woah Woah. What the heck is this? Smells like a setup to a fake claim to me. No townie would hint so heavily bout being a power role on Day One with little so pressure.In post 366, NotNova wrote:Also @Thor — can I ask you in advance for an IC-hat guide on Day 2 on how PRs should act? Thanks.
It tends to be a major point of discussion in early D2 from what I've seen, which is why I asked in advance.
That said, I REALLY don't appreciate you trying to speculate about me having a PR. It's incredibly anti-town. You should be bringing this up if and when I do claim.
I advise we drop this discussion immediately.
VOTE NOTNOVAIn post 389, Haylen wrote:Besides, I'm advertising that I think you're setting yourself up for a fake claim, not that I think you're a power role.-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
So are you saying at this point that you think Ceejay is more likely to be scum than Haylen then?In post 469, xwing wrote:mmmmmm..guys..i need guidance..
30 mins left before i leave..
both wagons are at L-1..i cant hammer haylen coz im on that wagon already..
i can still hammer ceej..
if we got a legit JK, only PR available is doctor and tracker..
if ceej is legit doctor, we got mafia RB, so the kill will still go through regardless if he protects volxen..
do we believe this claim..as it's the easiest (from site consensus) for mafia to claim?
note ceej didnt claim VT..
quick..reundo notnova wake up..CT? sky? volxen? thor?
do we believe this claim?
im leaning on NOT believing..
on the off-chance it's true..i will be responsible for hammering our doctor.. -_-"-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
Yes, that's true. Ceejay is either the real doctor, in which case both town power roles have now been outed, or he is scum fake claiming as a last ditch effort to not get lynched. If he is the real doctor and they roleblock him, then the only way I could survive the night is if I put the member of the scumteam who tries to kill me in jail. Which is not going to be easy to do...In post 473, xwing wrote:unfortunately haylen doesnt seem to be active right now..
im leaving the office now..i trust reundo to be active soon and to be around just in case we choose to hammer ceej, but i'll stick around sometime by phone just in case..i'll be driving and will be rereading this an hour from now (depending on traffic)..
we got a little less than 2 hours before deadline..
sky is here and can hammer haylen so there's that relief..
pedit: huh..noted on the angel replace..wonder what thor thinks of our "twice replace theory" now..
@volxen: i dont know..im so torn..but one of them is getting lynched today..on one hand it's safer to go for haylen for today..
but otoh if ceej's doc claim is true, then we've got mafia RB, so ceej's role will be useless to protect you anyway..assuming ceej's claim is false, great..we got scum..i need to leave now guys, will come back sooner than later, i hope..-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
Well if Haylen flips red, that would make me more inclined to believe that NotNova is town. I mean, NotNova was previously on my wagon, and after I role claimed, he stated a clear preference for lynching Haylen over Ceejay. If NotNova and Haylen were scum partners, I don't think NotNova would go out of his way to help lynch his scumbuddy (Haylen) when he could simply join the Ceejay wagon and contribute to his mislynch without really taking any heat.In post 484, CheekyTeeky wrote:Volxen if he flips red who will you target? It would help if you let us know so we still have a confirmed town if you die. Don't say who you would check on a green flip though.
I'm assuming here also that scum would not consider it optimal to bus on day one, since there are only two scum partners in newbie games and busing means you are killing off 50% of your scum team. I don't think this is something that a sensible scum team would take lightly, since busing does not always lead to getting town credit or becoming locktown. So if Haylen is scum, after my role claim I think his partner would be inclined to jump on Ceejay's wagon rather than go out of his/her way to bus his/her scum partner.
In other words, if Haylen flips red I think all of the people that clearly stated that they would prefer to lynch Haylen over Ceejay (after I roleclaimed and it was clear that I would not be lynched) are much less likely to be scum. This includes NotNova, xwing, and Reundo -- all of whom stated a clear preference of lynching Haylen over Ceejay as soon as I role claimed.
So if Haylen flips red, I think it would be logical to look at the people who preferred to lynch Ceejay over Haylen.-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
Who will I target for my night action? I'm assuming the scum team is definitely going to target me for the nightkill, and roleblock Ceejay (assuming Ceejay is not scum). So I think my only play is to try and predict which member of the scum team is going to try and nightkill me, and jail that person so the kill doesn't go through. It's a long shot, but it's all I can do.In post 484, CheekyTeeky wrote:Volxen if he flips red who will you target? It would help if you let us know so we still have a confirmed town if you die. Don't say who you would check on a green flip though.-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
OK, if Haylen flips red then I would target Thor since he was the only person on Ceejay's wagon who was unwilling to vote for Haylen.In post 489, CheekyTeeky wrote:The point of you choosing one person to use your ability on is so that we're left with a conf town if you die or confirmed scum if you survive. This play only makes sense if Haylen flips red as it leaves only 1 mafia to do the kill. If Haylen flips green just go with your gut.-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
Alright, per your advice, I will let Ceejay reveal who he saved before I reveal who I targeted and placed in jail.In post 499, Thor665 wrote:Thor665(4) - horrordude0215, Reundo, RCEnigma, xwing
NotNova (1) -volxen
RCEnigma (1) -Thor665
xwing (1) - NotNova
Not Voting (2) -Haylen, UC Voyager
Ceejay(4) -Thor665, horrordude0215, xwing,volxen
Thor665 (1) - Reundo
volxen (1) - NotNova
Not Voting (3) -Haylen, RCEnigma,ceejayvinoya
volxen(4) - NotNova,ceejayvinoya, xwing, Reundo
ceejayvinoya (2) -Thor665,volxen
angel7399 (1) - RCEnigma
Not Voting (2) -Haylen, Skygazer
Haylen(5) - Reundo, xwing, NotNova,ceejayvinoya, Skygazer
ceejayvinoya (2) -Thor665,volxen
NotNova (1) -Haylen
Not Voting (1) - CheekyTeeky
The above are for my own use because I like to see pretty colors and because I expect one to change soon
@Cheeky Teeky - pretty sure you asked about the impossible shift that I was claiming happened from Ceejay to Volxen, to answer your question it would be xwing as the swing vote and Ceejay as also suspect within the same concept. If it wasn't you then that's the answer to whoever was acting like Ceejay was the counterwagon to Volxen (which I know included xwing and I think Reundo made that claim also - both are objectively wrong).
I would like to hear the claims of both Power roles for their night target.
I think the claim ordr should be;
Ceejay
*then*
Volxen
If anyone disagrees please let me know why, but considering Ceejay was more likely to be blocked if he was town (and should have objectively the more suspect claim unless you're blind) he should claim result first.
@CT - why didn't you want his claim first, or at all? Just auto ignoring it due to theory block and not even wanting the info?
Also, just as an [IC hat] moment;
I'd like you all to consider how the lynch went down, and whether that played out in a pro or anti town way. Did you get as much time to discuss the claims as you'd like? Did it feel like town was stumbling around and scrambling a bit? Would it, perhaps, have behooved us to cut out a few semi-wasted days in the middle? I recognize that replacements and the extension comprised some of those days - but this is a good point to analyze so you can maybe get an idea of *when* it is good to get the first L-1 and claim of a day (and I will personally suggest it should be done at *least* a week before deadline, though will note many disagree with me...that said, they're wrong ) [/hat]-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
I targetedSkygazerand put her in jail, as I have been strongly suspecting that the scum team is either NotNova/Skygazer or xwing/Skygazer after day 1 ended.
The fact that the nightkill didn’t go through makes me more convinced that she is scum. I think the following scenario is what played out:
The mafia roleblocker blocked CJ.
Skygazer attempted to kill me, but because I put her in jail, the kill didn’t go through.
Now if the scumteam wanted to, they could have guaranteed a night kill on CJ, because they could have roleblocked me (thus preventing me from jailing anyone) and just killed CJ. So I’m assuming I was the higher priority target for them, and since I didn’t list Skygazer as a scumread on day one, they figured the kill was not at too much risk of being stopped.
The only other plausible scenario to me is that CJ is scum rather than the doctor, but someone else is the doctor, and the real doctor protected me, and thus the scumteam didn’t know who to roleblock. So unless we are entertaining the possibility that Ceejay is actually VT but lied about being doctor to save himself, that pretty much means there is a 100% chance that either CJ is scum or Skygazer is scum, because these are the only two plausible scenarios that make sense for explaining why there was no nightkill. Currently, I’m inclined to believe that Ceejay is town and Skygazer is scum.
There were several things I looked at after day 1 to help me determine who I wanted to place in jail. To start with, I looked at the Thor wagon, Ceejay[UC] wagon, and Volxen wagon. All three of these wagons got up to L-1 status with four votes, andI believe that each of these wagons had scum on them. I didn’t focus on the Haylen wagon as much (though there was no doubt scum on the Haylen wagon), as that wagon formed in the very last hours on the day of the deadline, after both myself and CJ claimed power roles. And since {Volxen, CJ[UC], and Haylen} were presented as the only three lynch options, and Haylen himself apparently was not around to make a claim, it was pretty much a foregone conclusion that he would be lynched after both myself and CJ claimed power roles with the very limited amount of time we had left before deadline.
Here was the vote count when Thor was at L-1:
Here was the vote count when Ceejay was at L-1:
And here was the vote count when Volxen was at L-1:
In particular, it stuck out to me that all three of xwing, Sky[Horror], and Reundo were on more than one of these major day one wagons (which I emphasized in the vote counts). Most notably, xwing was on
ALL THREEof these wagons. Sky[Horror] was on the Thor wagon and the CJ wagon. Reundo was on the Thor wagon and the Volxen wagon.
However, after reviewing his ISO a bit during night 1, I still believe that Reundo is likely town, despite him being on two of these wagons. So I focused more on xwing and Sky and their interactions. Though I still believe that NotNova could be scum with Sky.
One thing that’s interesting to note regarding xwing and Sky[Horror], is that they were both on the Thor and CJ wagons, and in both cases Sky[Horror]’s slot joined the wagon first. So if xwing and Sky[Horror] are scum together, this could be xwing sheeping his more experienced scum partner’s (Horror at the time) vote on both wagons. Vote-wise xwing was all over the place on day 1, and multiple people questioned his reasoning for being the L-1 voter on the Thor wagon in particular (“I want to stand out unlike my last game”).
Beyond their votes, I found some of the interactions between Sky[Horror]’s slot and xwing to be quite interesting.
Here Horror kind of goes back-and-forth on xwing, first criticizing xwing’s vote on Thor, but then he later defend’s xwing in the same post. He acts like he would be fine with either an xwing wagon or a UC wagon, but he votes for UC over xwing, claiming that there are some “interesting associatives” between UC and xwing that he wanted to explore. But at that point in time there had not been any back-and-forth conversation between xwing and UC. At that point in time the only thing that had happened between xwing and UC is that xwing asked UC about the broken vote tags in the post where he supposedly tried to vote for Thor (see: 16), which was followed by xwing listing UC as a scumread (whom xwing hadn’t voted for yet – see: 27 ). So Horror was incredibly vague about what “interesting associatives” he wanted to explore, and why voting for UC over xwing would better help him accomplish that goal. Especially considering he talked a lot more about xwing than UC in his post, and was arguably more critical of xwing (despite later defending him) than UC, but yet decided to vote for UC anyways.In post 155, horrordude0215 wrote:I'm reading the game through right now and I'll be commenting on my thoughts as I go in a stream of consciousness dialogue style. I'm almost certainly going to be rehashing some things were already covered and explained, but as mafia is a game largely based on reactions, I believe in being as transparent as possible regarding what I'm thinking as I read the thread.
- UC's 16 really confuses me. The vote and unvote is purely semantic, and his entire intro to the game is "I want to vote for Thor because he scares me but I don't want to actually apply pressure to him right now."
- I like Thor's early push for an RVS wagon. While I personally am not great at RVS analysis, being able to get an early wagon on someone allows us to gauge the overall gamestate and test reactions, thereby allowing us to move out of RVS and into the game at hand.
- In the same breath, I dislike Thor's comment about claiming that you don't want to lynch someone on page 1 is in any way AI [alignment indicative]. Yes, you want to place a vote on the person you would like to be lynchedeventually, but there's definitely nothing wrong with saying that you don't want to lynch someone right this second when the game is a few hours old. ***Slight interjection as I'm about halfway through the thread - this is one of the aforementioned "hashed to death" issues in this game and further discussion of it would likely be inconsequential at this point in the game, but that was my first thought when I read this post.***
- Volxen gets town points for 21
This reads as potentially buddying to me.In post 23, RCEnigma wrote:Reundo can confirm we are in fact, not scum partners.
- I'm really not a fan of xwing's 27. The reasoning for hopping on Thor's wagon seem very forced, even going so far as to admit it's a sheep of Reundo and RC's case.
- (Quick side note, I actually really appreciate that this game appears to be more content driven without the spamposting that is the meta on most other parts of the site.)
- 41 looks like xwing trying to drum up reasoning for being on the wagon after being called out for their initially weak vote. I also don't like that they admit they would be voting elsewhere except that they wanted to put Thor at L-1. I'm a fan of early wagons, but when you're on page 2 I feel that there's nothing you would get from an L-1 vote that you wouldn't get from L-2, so intentionally joining the wagon is suspicious to me.
I disagree with this. The wagon was still at L-1 at this point with at least 3 slots (mine, UC, and the one currently being replaced) without a single serious post in the game. I don't know how you can properly judge the wagon with over 1/3 of the game inactive.In post 58, NotNova wrote:Looking at the wagon again, unlike RCE, I think it lost momentum over time and don't see any particular reason to suspect him.
Pointing out here that town have an agenda as well - their agenda is to lynch scum. Scum is more likely to intentionally use misinformation to get town to mislynch, but that doesn't mean that a misguided townie can't do the same thing unintentionally. The best way to sort these actions is to sortIn post 77, RCEnigma wrote:Your second point is semantics. Yes that is exactly what a conversation is, yes you are swaying player A's vote in both examples. That's manipulation if it pushes your agenda.howthey're conversing, and you learn a lot more about those interactions after a flip.
- xwing's 90 feels genuine to me, as if they genuinely realize they made a mistake hopping on Thor's wagon without much explanation. Whether it's remorseful town or backtracking scum is to be determined.
- Initially thor/RC is reading as tvt.
The thing is, it's honestly a pretty suspicious thing for you to not be voting for your strongest scumread at the moment. There's no such thing as a pressureless vote, and it's advantageous for town to use their vote with this knowledge in mind. Will you voting for UC cause people to suddenly drop everything and lolwagon him? Probably not. But your decision to pressure one of the inactive slots would at the very least be consistent with some of the reads you've posted so far, and it has the potential to get other players to look at the slot more in depth.In post 139, xwing wrote:what kind of pressure do you expect me to put on UC? have you read my rock solid case on him? (hmm maybe not yet but you will later..continue reading til the later pages).. i leaned scum on him on what..page 2..on why..his first post..do you think he will be pressured if i put my vote on him now? do you think others will be convinced and follow suit? honestly?
now it's more like im waiting for him to speak/address my question..when he comes back then i can engage with him more..
In xwing's defense, they have stated that this is their 2nd game on the site, and it's already far more in depth and requires a lot more attention than I would say is standard for a newbie game. Even I've had to resort to some skimming to help get through my readthrough - I don't think you necessarily have to read and absorb every word of a game to be able to play decently.In post 146, Thor665 wrote:Frankly though, if you're town aren't you basically game throwing right now and being a jerk to all your fellow town team by not bothering to read posts to help catch a scum member or figure out a town member?
HEY YAY I'M CAUGHT UP ON THE THREAD.
I'm probably going to be doing some ISO reads and other things tomorrow to help me sort my thoughts on the game as a whole, but for right now
UNVOTE:
VOTE: UC Voyager
I'm okay pushing this button and seeing what comes out. There are some interesting associatives with xwing that I want to explore as well, so I would be good with a wagon on either right now.
And then here are several posts from Sky:
Here Skygazer writes off xwing as town simply because he was the voter who brought Thor to L-1. I find that to be an incredibly poor reason to clear someone from being scum.In post 269, Skygazer wrote:Page 2:
town pings from xwing for knowingly placing Thor at L-1 on page 2. Shows a lack of caution that doesn't come from newb-scum
Skygazer made this post on 9/16/18 at 6:51 P.M. PST:
I find it interesting that she immediately arrived at the lynch pool of {CJ, Angel, Volxen}, which was the same exact lynch pool that both NotNova and xwing had. And like both of them, her initial preference was to lynch me specifically.In post 271, Skygazer wrote:would lynch between CJ, Angel, and Volxen mostly on PoE
Volxen feels better to me than CJ and Angel.
Intent to hammerafter an Angel replacement is found unless the deadline is extended.
Then she made this postone minute laterat 6:52 P.M. PST:
So in one minute she went from wanting to hammer me, to now considering the CJ wagon. Quite a fast backpedal.In post 272, Skygazer wrote:CJ wagon is not the worst due to early UC posts actually
This was several days before the deadline, but here it sounds like she isn’t interesting in sorting people on her own but instead just wants to follow her townreads. And she shows complete indifference to which of {Volxen, CJ, or Haylen} gets lynched, even though she knew all three of us couldn’t be scum.In post 274, Skygazer wrote:ill think it over,im kind of unconcerned over who gets lynchedas long as its not one of my strong townreads
i may end up just sheeping whichever wagon has the majority of my townreads
She seems to be saying here that she isn’t full-blown scumreading me, but a few hours ago she was willing to place the hammer vote on me?In post 315, Skygazer wrote:
Thor's experience is precisely why I was examining the particular wording rather than the action itself. I wouldn't be surprised by him trying to lead an early wagon to L-2 as either alignment, so I'm not really townreading him for a lack of caution with that specific wagon attempt. It's just the particular way he used the word "me" (support me, oppose me, help me) struck me as something that would be odd for town to say. I also know from his interview that he tends to make early wagon pushes on Day 1 to help with forming reads and getting reactions, so the way he specifically mentions how the wagon being at L-2 will be more helpful to him lines up with my understanding of his town play. Granted, he's probably self-aware enough to be able to mimic his town-play really well, but this is exactly how I feel like town-Thor would play this out.In post 283, Reundo wrote:I realize you probably don't stand by this too much, but I'd think someone as experienced as Thor wouldn't bother as much with being cautious as scum. That seems like something that would only really be AI if he was new as scum, or if he's naturally cautious when playing as scum as opposed to town, which I kind of doubt.
That's a good question. I don't think a post like this shows a particular lack of caution:In post 283, Reundo wrote:Sky, what do you think about volxen being one of the first players to engage with Thor during RVS? Do you feel the same applies to volxen that he'd be too cautious to engage with Thor and draw his attention as scum?
It feels like a really obvious question to ask, and he doesn't back up this engagement with a vote. Even by his post 21 it feels like he's starting to form light stances (well, more implied stances from the questions he's asking) and ask the sort of questions that would normally be leading the town out of RVS but he still keeps his RVS vote. By the time Thor is at L-1, volx is the only player that questioned Thor about his comment about bringing RC to L-2 that hasn't voted for Thor yet. While wagoning a player to L-1 (Reundo, RCE, xwing) shows a distinct lack of caution that you'd see from newer scum players, not placing a vote on a player you've been questioning does show some sort of restraint/caution in my opinion.In post 19, volxen wrote:Thor, why do you want to put RC at L-2 so early in the game? Do you really believe that his vote for Reundo was serious rather than RVS?Not enough for a full scumread, but volx's engagement with thor doesn't give me the same town pings that your vote, RCE's vote, and xwing's votes have.
This was just… odd. Here NotNova was just stating a blatantly obvious fact: since I had just role claimed Jailkeeper, that meant we are in row 2 of the matrix. So unless she was doubting my role claim, then why suggest that this statement was “tmi”? If NotNova believed my role claim (which seems to be the case since he switched his vote), then it would be reasonable for him to point this out.In post 424, Skygazer wrote:
this feels like tmiIn post 410, NotNova wrote:Scum now knows the setup, by the way, as we're definitely in row 2.
In post 430, Skygazer wrote:
Nova's statement is correct if volx is the JK but the way the post is worded it feels like NovaIn post 426, xwing wrote:
why?In post 424, Skygazer wrote:
this feels like tmiIn post 410, NotNova wrote:Scum now knows the setup, by the way, as we're definitely in row 2.
nova's statement is factual..even i agree that mafia knows the setup now, assuming volxen is JK..
town, on the other hand..is sorta blind still..there might either be a doctor, a tracker, or no more PRs for us...knowsthat the claim is true.
I think this isIn post 433, Skygazer wrote:Not doubting volxen at the moment but that doesn't mean someone who implies that the claim is 100% true doesn't have too much infoincrediblyreachy. NotNova’s post does not come across like he has scum knowledge, which is what Sky seems to be implying here.
Another interesting thing about Sky is that she sorted every slot except for NotNova’s, which could potentially point to a NotNova/Sky pairing:
Here she lists Volxen, Ceejay, and Haylen as scumreads:
And here she lists CT[RC], Reundo, xwing, and Thor as townreads:In post 271, Skygazer wrote:would lynch between CJ, Angel, and Volxen mostly on PoE
Volxen feels better to me than CJ and Angel.
Intent to hammer after an Angel replacement is found unless the deadline is extended.
Although in fairness to NotNova, he did question Sky about the fact that she didn’t sort him:In post 317, Skygazer wrote:
I'm not sure how the celebrity status thing changes much. He's still an IC. xwing putting him at L-1 on page 2 shows a distinct lack of caution that doesn't feel like it comes from scum regardless of Thor's celebrity status or IC status. Do you think I shouldn't be townreading those three, then?In post 289, NotNova wrote:I'm not exactly sure if xwing or Reundo have any clue of Thor's apparent reputation, considering Reundo at one point pretty much said he would never trust Thor's reads and xwing expressed surprised at his "celebrity" status, as he said. Not sure for RCE.
In post 289, NotNova wrote:Who are your strongest townreads, then? Could you give some more reasoning on them?RCE/Reundo/xwing are strongest, Thor not as strongbecause I'm assuming he's self-aware enough to be able to mimick his town thought processes but he can hopefully be sorted better through PoE later on (I'd still sheep the heck out of him for the info, though).
I've already given reasonings (lack of caution/meta). If more stuff comes up as I start to actually play I'll be sure to mention it but I've done my read through and that's what I got from it.
At this point I am convinced that Sky is scum. And I know that there was scum on my wagon, and I don’t believe it is either Ceejay or Reundo. xwing/Sky seems like the most likely scumteam, but I haven’t ruled out the possibility of a NotNova/Sky scumteam yet either.In post 321, NotNova wrote:I didn't mean the unvote when I was talking about "going back on it", I meant the general thought process behind voting Thor in the first place.
Considering there's a player in the game who played with xwing before, staying passive could in all likelihood earn them heat. If I have to pick between playing to perceived town-expectations as scum or continuing to do what you've been called out for, I pick the former as the likelier and overall smarter decision.
I can see your angle, but I don't think I agree.
I notice you haven't really mentioned me so far — do you have any read on me so far?Do you give credemce to volxen's scumread on me? Have I been difficult to read or did something ping you wrong about my play?
VOTE: Skygazer-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
And regarding Ceejay, his roleclaim aside I started to get town pings from him from these posts:
In post 341, ceejayvinoya wrote:@Volxen do you have a previous game that I can parse? Or is this your first?
I got town pings from him for these two posts because he 1) was having a hard time reading me and was willing to put in the effort to read one of my previous games to do so and 2) didn’t try to get any town credit by doing so.In post 395, ceejayvinoya wrote:
You played well there. It doesn't merge with what I see here. I'm more certain now that volxen is scum here. He's much more townie and straightforward in this game he linked.In post 353, volxen wrote:
My only completed game is Newbie 1885 (I was town in it). Here is a link to it: viewtopic.php?f=11&t=77049In post 341, ceejayvinoya wrote:@Volxen do you have a previous game that I can parse? Or is this your first?
And actually, I could see how he could arrive at the conclusion that he did (even though it was wrong) – that I was scum in this game because my gameplay in this game was different than my town gameplay in Newbie 1885. The truth is that circumstances were very different for me in that game, namely that it 1) had aMUCHslower pace than this game, 2) most of the posts in that game were very short compared to this game having a lot of wall-posts, so reading and responding takes a lot more time in this game and 3) I wasn’t working at the time that I was playing Newbie 1885, so it was easy for me to be one of the most vocal and active posters in that game right off the bat, whereas in this game I genuinely got pretty busy in the beginning of the game, which unfortunately ended up making me look scummy (i.e., like I was purposefully active lurking). So putting all of that together, I did in fact have a stronger “town presence” on day 1 of Newbie 1885 than I did in day 1 of this game. So even though Ceejay was ultimately wrong about me, I could see how he could reasonably come to the conclusion he did by comparing my gameplay in this game to my town gameplay in Newbie 1885. The fact that he did all of this, without trying to gain any town credit for himself, leads me to believe that he is town, as I don’t really see any scum-motivation for him to do this.-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
Well I've never been in this situation before, so I would like to hear from others. So there are really two possibilities:
Scenario A: What I described in my post. The mafia roleblocker blocked CJ and Skygazer tried to kill me, but the kill failed because I put her in jail.
Scenario B: The no-kill gambit. The scumteam purposefully doesn't kill anyone so they can frame the JK target to be mislynched on day 2.
The problem I'm having with scenario B is, does it really provide a greater benefit to the scumteam in the long run compared to scenario A? it also has some risk, in the event that I actually do end up jailing scum, as opposed to a townie, which means they have to abort the entire plan of framing the JK target for the day 2 mislynch.
So why is that better than simply nightkilling (or at least trying to nightkill) one of the town power roles? How does scenario B benefit the scumteam going into night 2 and day 3?
It just seems very plausible to me that scenario A is the reality, and this is the scumteams fall-back plan to scumpaint CJ and make it look like he orchestrated all of this to frame the JK target (Sky). So if there is a lot of merit to scenario B realistically being more likely than scenario A, please help me understand why.-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
Another issue I take with scenario B is, I did list CJ as one of my top scumreads on day 1. So what if I had jailed CJ instead of Sky, whom I only started to seriously suspect during night 1? So if CJ is scum, considering he was one of my top scumreads, I would think the scumteam would seriously consider the possibility that I would jail him, despite his roleclaim at the end of day 1. So in that scenario, they 1) lost an opportunity to kill a power role and 2) wouldn't be able to pursue their plan of getting the JK target mislynched. It just seems like scenario B presents a lot of risk to the scumteam with no guarantee of any benefit.-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
Well you are still my strongest townread, so I'm definitely eager to hear your take on things.In post 518, CheekyTeeky wrote:Volxen I appreciate your argument however I'll refrain from commenting until others have checked in and CJ has responded to the current arguments.-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
No, if they role blocked me then Sky wouldn't have actually been placed in jail. And no, I wouldn't know if I got role blocked.In post 523, xwing wrote:if mafia RB blocked volxen, would volxen prison on sky still go through?
i mean would it be blocked, rendering JK action null?
if yes, would JK know if they were blocked? i think not, or else volxen would have mentioned it already, but asking to make sure..-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
Who do you think is Sky's scum partner?In post 553, xwing wrote:
you're wrong about me, but i'll wait and see what action scum will do..In post 551, volxen wrote:OK... Sky just self-hammered herself. The five people voting for Sky are: Volxen, NotNova, Ceejay, Reundo, and Sky.
If Sky flips scum, I will targetxwingtonight. If Sky is scum, I still believe the scumteam is either Sky/xwing or Sky/NotNova, with the former being more likely than the latter.
if notnova is scum, i've been hoodwinked bad..but let's see..-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
So basically if Sky flips mafia goon you think her partner is Ceej, and if she flips mafia roleblocker you think her partner is CT?In post 556, xwing wrote:hmmm i'd still think it's ceej, and my belief is we're in C2..
what were the chances that on D1 we would out both PRs..
scum!ceej knew you were likely to jail him so asked partner!sky to submit kill..
also explains why supposed doc!ceej still alive..
cuz if we're on A2, safer play will be to sure kill doc and block JK to ensure one PR kill..but WIFOM..
cuz your scenario A seems plausible as well..
if we're on A2, i really am not sure who to point out..
by gut alone my skin is breaking into hives with CT..just too towny..
but really though, the rest are town for me other than ceej really..sorry im not much help..i need to read ISOs but cant do that until later this evening..-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
Also in case I do die tonight, I just want to go on record saying that I doNOTthink any of these scumteam combinations are likely at all:
Sky/CT
Sky/Thor
Because either of those scumteam combinations would mean that my wagon was all-town, as the four people on my wagon were NotNova, xwing, Ceejay, and Reundo. I find it extremely unlikely that the four-person wagon against me was an all-town wagon.
Sky/Ceejay is possible, but I think it's probably not the case because remember that Horror went out of his way to vote for UC on day 1 when he wrote his "catch up" post:
In post 155, horrordude0215 wrote:I'm reading the game through right now and I'll be commenting on my thoughts as I go in a stream of consciousness dialogue style. I'm almost certainly going to be rehashing some things were already covered and explained, but as mafia is a game largely based on reactions, I believe in being as transparent as possible regarding what I'm thinking as I read the thread.
- UC's 16 really confuses me. The vote and unvote is purely semantic, and his entire intro to the game is "I want to vote for Thor because he scares me but I don't want to actually apply pressure to him right now."
- I like Thor's early push for an RVS wagon. While I personally am not great at RVS analysis, being able to get an early wagon on someone allows us to gauge the overall gamestate and test reactions, thereby allowing us to move out of RVS and into the game at hand.
- In the same breath, I dislike Thor's comment about claiming that you don't want to lynch someone on page 1 is in any way AI [alignment indicative]. Yes, you want to place a vote on the person you would like to be lynchedeventually, but there's definitely nothing wrong with saying that you don't want to lynch someone right this second when the game is a few hours old. ***Slight interjection as I'm about halfway through the thread - this is one of the aforementioned "hashed to death" issues in this game and further discussion of it would likely be inconsequential at this point in the game, but that was my first thought when I read this post.***
- Volxen gets town points for 21
This reads as potentially buddying to me.In post 23, RCEnigma wrote:Reundo can confirm we are in fact, not scum partners.
- I'm really not a fan of xwing's 27. The reasoning for hopping on Thor's wagon seem very forced, even going so far as to admit it's a sheep of Reundo and RC's case.
- (Quick side note, I actually really appreciate that this game appears to be more content driven without the spamposting that is the meta on most other parts of the site.)
- 41 looks like xwing trying to drum up reasoning for being on the wagon after being called out for their initially weak vote. I also don't like that they admit they would be voting elsewhere except that they wanted to put Thor at L-1. I'm a fan of early wagons, but when you're on page 2 I feel that there's nothing you would get from an L-1 vote that you wouldn't get from L-2, so intentionally joining the wagon is suspicious to me.
I disagree with this. The wagon was still at L-1 at this point with at least 3 slots (mine, UC, and the one currently being replaced) without a single serious post in the game. I don't know how you can properly judge the wagon with over 1/3 of the game inactive.In post 58, NotNova wrote:Looking at the wagon again, unlike RCE, I think it lost momentum over time and don't see any particular reason to suspect him.
Pointing out here that town have an agenda as well - their agenda is to lynch scum. Scum is more likely to intentionally use misinformation to get town to mislynch, but that doesn't mean that a misguided townie can't do the same thing unintentionally. The best way to sort these actions is to sortIn post 77, RCEnigma wrote:Your second point is semantics. Yes that is exactly what a conversation is, yes you are swaying player A's vote in both examples. That's manipulation if it pushes your agenda.howthey're conversing, and you learn a lot more about those interactions after a flip.
- xwing's 90 feels genuine to me, as if they genuinely realize they made a mistake hopping on Thor's wagon without much explanation. Whether it's remorseful town or backtracking scum is to be determined.
- Initially thor/RC is reading as tvt.
The thing is, it's honestly a pretty suspicious thing for you to not be voting for your strongest scumread at the moment. There's no such thing as a pressureless vote, and it's advantageous for town to use their vote with this knowledge in mind. Will you voting for UC cause people to suddenly drop everything and lolwagon him? Probably not. But your decision to pressure one of the inactive slots would at the very least be consistent with some of the reads you've posted so far, and it has the potential to get other players to look at the slot more in depth.In post 139, xwing wrote:what kind of pressure do you expect me to put on UC? have you read my rock solid case on him? (hmm maybe not yet but you will later..continue reading til the later pages).. i leaned scum on him on what..page 2..on why..his first post..do you think he will be pressured if i put my vote on him now? do you think others will be convinced and follow suit? honestly?
now it's more like im waiting for him to speak/address my question..when he comes back then i can engage with him more..
In xwing's defense, they have stated that this is their 2nd game on the site, and it's already far more in depth and requires a lot more attention than I would say is standard for a newbie game. Even I've had to resort to some skimming to help get through my readthrough - I don't think you necessarily have to read and absorb every word of a game to be able to play decently.In post 146, Thor665 wrote:Frankly though, if you're town aren't you basically game throwing right now and being a jerk to all your fellow town team by not bothering to read posts to help catch a scum member or figure out a town member?
HEY YAY I'M CAUGHT UP ON THE THREAD.
I'm probably going to be doing some ISO reads and other things tomorrow to help me sort my thoughts on the game as a whole, but for right now
UNVOTE:
VOTE: UC Voyager
I'm okay pushing this button and seeing what comes out. There are some interesting associatives with xwing that I want to explore as well, so I would be good with a wagon on either right now.-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
These are my final thoughts that I want to leave everyone with in case I'm not around for day 3:
- If Sky flips scum (99.99% chance of that happening with the self-hammer),I will target. On the 00.01% chance she self-hammered as town, then I will go with my gut regarding who I target.xwingtonight
- As far as I am concerned,Sky flipping scum means that CT and Thor are both confirmed town. I just don't think it's plausible that the wagon against me on day 1 was an all-town wagon, considering how close I came to being lynched. Yes, I feel that strongly about this.
This means there are really four possible scumteams. Here is how I would rank them from most likely to least likely:
1. Sky/xwing
2. Sky/NotNova
3. Sky/Ceejay*
4. Sky/Reundo**
*If Sky flips mafia roleblocker, we can completely clear Ceejay as confirmed doctor as that would prove that there is a doctor in this setup, and no one has counter-claimed Ceejay on being doctor. Any doctor counter-claim on day 3 would beHIGHLYsuspect, because the real doctor should have already counter-claimed if CJ is in fact lying about being doctor.
**This is possible, but I would think that if the scumteam is Sky/Reundo, then Reundo rather than Sky would have attempted to nightkill me on night 1, considering that I listed Reundo as a townread on day 1, whereas I listed Sky as a nullread:
It's possible they just forgot about this and figured that it didn't matter which of Reundo or Sky put the kill through. Still, Reundo is a very observant and analytical player, so I don't think he would have forgotten that I listed him as a townread and Sky as a nullread, and the logical play would be for my townread (Reundo) to try to kill me rather than my nullread (Sky). Especially since I even said here that I thought Sky could be scum despite listing her as a nullread at the time.In post 284, volxen wrote:@RCEnigma,
I’m not seeing what is so grounded about NotNova’s case against me. He really brought up two valid points against me:
1) That I didn’t have an early game reads list
2) That I had a period of inactivity
And those two things are equally applicable to all of the other lurker slots: Ceejay[UC], Sky[Horror], and Angel. But it’s as if he is holding me to a different standard than everyone else, because he has chosen to ignore the other lurker slots rather than taking the more equitable approach of presenting cases against all four of us.
If his theory is that it is very likely that one or even both members of the scumteam are among the lurkers, then how is it possibly the most logical approach to tunnel on one out of those four slots and completely ignore the other three? Even if he suspects me the most, should he not have made an effort to engage and question/pressure the other three lurker slots? Admittedly in the case of Angel this would be impossible since that slot has not checked in, but he has had ample opportunities to start seriously engaging/questioning/pressuring the Sky[Horror] and CeeJay[UC] slots. Especially in the case of Ceejay, who has been UC’s replacement for a while now, yet he has made no effort engage, question, or pressure him. In 260, he basically says that the best usage of his limited time to is death tunnel on my slot and ignore all of the other lurker slots because he doesn’t have an unlimited amount of time to devote to this game (as if any of us do).
For example, in 70 he asks me for a readslist. Why has he not asked the same of the Sky[Horror] and Ceejay[UC] slots? This is one of his two major points against me, yet he is unwilling to be equally critical of their slots for not having early game readslists.
His lynch pool also seems to be {Volxen, Volxen, Volxen, and more Volxen}. I haven’t seen him list the name of anyone else that he would seriously consider lynching. And we are on day 1 of a nine-player game that has two scum slots. And I seriously doubt anyone has uncovered the exact scum team, so at this point in time wouldn’t it be reasonable to expect NotNova to have at least 3 serious scumreads anyways? The only two people he has mentioned as scumreads are myself and xwing, and in 223, he said that xwing is “far below Volxen” on his list of scumreads, so I’m not even sure at this point how serious of a scumread xwing is for him.
Meanwhile, while it did come late, I did clearly list four scumreads in 258. To be more specific, this is how I am currently sorting everyone:
Town: {RCEnigma,, Thor}. Out of these three I feel the most confident about RC being town, but I really suspect that Reundo and Thor are both town as well. If either Reundo or Thor are scum they are doing an incredibly good job of covering up their agenda, because nothing in their interactions (with each other as well as with everyone else) or individual ISO’s stands out to me as being likely to be scum motivated.Reundo
Null: {}. This slot would be a scumread for me if Horror hadn’t made that catch-up post in 155, which was a fairly decent catch-up post.Sky[Horror]I still think it’s possible that the Sky[Horror] slot could be scum, but I think scum is much more likely to be residing among {NotNova, xwing, Ceejay[UC], and Angel}. For now the Sky[Horror] slot is null until I see more content from Sky.
Scum: {NotNova, xwing, Ceejay[UC], and Angel}. I already talked about these four slots in 258.
Ironically, even though he does have a lot more content than I did in the beginning of the game, I am currently taking a much more holistic and open-minded approach to this game than he is. He is insistent on death tunneling me, whereas I have shared a total of four scumreads, any of whom I would be OK with lynching. To be perfectly clear, that means my lynch pool is {NotNova, xwing, Ceejay[UC], and Angel}. I wouldn’t be adamantly opposed to a Sky[Horror] lynch, but I believe that any of my four scumreads would be a better lynch.
One of my biggest concerns regarding NotNova is that if he is in fact town, he is setting himself up to look unnecessarily scummy with my mislynch (if I am lynched on day 1) going into day 2. Let me put it this way:
Scenario 1:
A = NotNova death tunnels Volxen
B = NotNova ignores the other lurker slots (Sky[Horror], Ceejay[UC], and Angel)
C = Volxen is mislynched day 1
D = scumteam has a much easier time scumpainting NotNova on day 2
A+B+C=D
If I am mislynched on day 1, NotNova is undoubtedly going to take heat for my mislynch, because it is a wagon that he has started, and he has been very forcefully pushing for me to be lynched today. Xwing has also tunneled on me to some extent lately, but no one else on my wagon has been death tunneling me the way NotNova has been. He has been death tunneling me and ignoring the other lurker slots, period. So if I am mislynched and flip town, it’s not exactly going to be hard for the scumteam to start making the argument that NotNova was pushing a scum agenda with my mislynch (and possibly push for NotNova own mislynch on day 2). They could make similar arguments to what I have been making – that he has been highly inconsistent in his push against me while completely ignoring the other lurker slots. The difference is that at that point I would be confirmed town, so the point about him being inconsistent becomes even more valid. And his whole theory that scum is likely to be among the lurkers won’t be a valid defense for him to fall back on, because of his singular focus on only one out of the four lurker slots (and the one with the most content out of the four to boot).
Scenario 2:
A= NotNova equally focuses on all four lurker slots (Volxen, Sky[Horror], Ceejay[UC], and Angel)
B = Volxen happens to be one out of the four lurker slots that is chosen to be lynched
C= Volxen is mislynched day 1
D= scumteam has a much harder time scumpainting NotNova on day 2
A+B+C=D
If thiswerethe case, this would be the much better scenario for NotNova going into day 2, because it’s going to be more difficult for the scumteam to scumpaint paint him (and push for his mislynch on day 2) if he were equally pressuring all four of (Volxen, Sky[Horror], Ceejay[UC], and Angel) and I just happened to be the one that was lynched. He could defend himself by falling back on his theory that scum is likely to be among the lurkers (Volxen, Sky[Horror], Ceejay[UC], and Angel). It then becomes harder for the scumteam to suggest that NotNova was pushing a scum agenda, because they have to attack his entire premise (that scum are more likely to be among the lurkers) in order to do that.
The problem is that scenario 1 is the current reality. His lynch pool should in theory be {Volxen, xwing, Sky[horror], Ceejay[UC], and Angel}: all of the lurkers plus xwing, since xwing is apparently still a scumread for him. But the only person he has any interest in lynching is me.
Either he has an incredibly narrow-minded and short-sighted town game for day 1 (death tunnel one suspect and ignore all of the other lurker slots) or he is simply scum. If he is town, I would encourage him to start taking a more holistic and open-minded approach to this game so that his death tunneling of me cannot be used against him by the scumteam. Because believe it or not, the most important thing to me is that town wins this game. Of course, I don’t want to be mislynched, but what would be worse than my mislynch is if my mislynch is followed by NotNova himself getting mislynched on day 2 because he inadvertently makes himself look scummy with how hard he death tunneled on me to the exclusion of all else on day 1.
Seriously @NotNova, you need to start taking a more holistic and open-minded view of the game, and you need to start doing that now. Yes, I get it I am your top suspect, but you are aware that there are two scum slots in this game, and you are also not 100% confident of your scumread of me. At this point in the game you should, at a minimum, have 3 serious scumreads, and you should be willing to vote for any of them.-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
I jailed xwing like I said I would. Why do you think xwing is cleared? If xwing is scum and Ceejay is doctor, the only person xwing couldIn post 573, Thor665 wrote:Reundo really feels like a logistically likely to me scum due to wagon positioning across the board.
Xwing and Ceejay are also suspect.
Not feeling totally confident on Reundo due to thinking he's just a prickly sort who let himself play b;ind this game - maybe I'm wrong and my initial scumread is accurate, but that's where I'm at with that slot.
Still kind of like the logic clearing Ceejay due to the Horror bus - and in any case, as long as scum wants to play the "theory roleblock" game I'm content to play that.
Pretty much want to flip xwing today unless he was jailed in which case we can "theory" clear him for endgame with Ceejay. (if people are confused by this please ask and I'll walk through it on the presumption I'm dead prior to endgame). If xwing was jailed I'd say it's a debate between RCE and Reundo, I'd probably opt to flip Reundo since I feel less confident there.NOTkill was myself, because I jailed him, he roleblocked either myself or Ceejay, and Ceejay protected me. He could have killed Ceejay or anyone else except for me.
I still think xwing is Sky's most likely scum partner, and he is pulling this move to try and frame Ceejay. This reeks of inexperienced scum, because killing NotNova was not the optimal play, regardless of who is scum. If Ceejay is scum, he cannot afford to go to 3-player LYLO with a confirmed town jailkeeper. He's experienced enough to know this and he would have NK'd me, because if I got NK'd theONLYthing it would prove is that xwing is not scum, since I jailed him. Me being NK’d wouldn't have proven that Ceejay is scum, because anyone other than xwing (whom I jailed) could have NK'd me by roleblocking Ceejay and killing me. Especially since I made it 100% clear beforehand that I would be targetting xwing. So it’s not like scum!Ceejay would be sealing his fate by NK’ing me.
If ceejay was scum, he would have NK'd me and tried to blame someone else (he could have blamed anyone other than xwing). Yes, Ceejay NK’ing me WOULD make xwing confirmed town (because xwing is the one person who could not have killed me since I jailed him), but that’s better than leaving someone who is both confirmed town AND a power role alive (me). I don’t believe that scum!Ceejay would leave me alive and instead NK a vanilla townie.
This just comes off to me as the work of an inexperienced scum (xwing) who isn’t really sure of what the optimal play is in this situation, and he is on his own now since Sky got lynched. I believe he NK’d NotNova because he believes his best move at this point is to try and frame Ceejay, which would explain why scum!xwing chose not to NK Ceejay.
I absolutely believe that if Ceejay was scum I wouldn’t be alive right now, because the optimal play for him would be to NK me. The optimal play for scum!xwing would have been to NK Ceejay (so he could NK me next), but I believe at this point he is just desperate and wants to try and secure Ceejay’s mislynch, and out of the VT’s he chose to NK NotNova because he perceived him to be fairly towny.-
-
volxen
-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
Xwing, I already explained this but Ceejay NK’ing me doesNOTinvalidate his doctor claim. Think about it, there are realistically only two possible scenarios regarding Ceejay*:
1) Ceejay is in fact the doctor, as he claims. Since I am the JK, this means we are in A2, which means there is a Mafia Roleblocker. Sky already flipped mafia goon, which means the remaining scum is obviously the mafia roleblocker. Thus, ANYONE can kill me EXCEPT for the person that I jail (which was xwing). They can do this by 1) roleblocking Ceejay and 2) killing me.The kill goes through as long as it’s not made by the person that I jail. Thor, CT, Reundo, Ceejay – any of these four could have NK’d me. Again, the ONLY person who could NOT kill me was you xwing – because I jailed you and Ceejay protected me, and you can’t roleblock both of us at the same time. And I furthermore announced ahead of time that it was you that I would be jailing, so if any of those four were the mafia roleblocker, they knew full well that there was a 100% guarantee that a NK against me would be successful. And if any of them were the mafia roleblocker, I am convinced that is exactly what would have happened. There is no benefit to scum!Thor, scum!Reundo, scum!CT, or scum!Ceejay in keeping the confirmed JK alive. And no risk of the NK failing when I announced ahead of time that I would be jailing xwing.But scum!xwing did not have the option of killing me.
2) Ceejay is scum. Since I am the JK and no one has CC’d Ceejay on being doctor, this means we are in C2, which means there is no mafia roleblocker. Since I didn’t jail CJ, this means he could have killed anyone he wanted to, including me. Logically, NK’ing me is what Ceejay should have done if he is in fact scum.
*And yes, this is making the assumption that Ceejay did not fakeclaim doctor as VT, as I don’t think that scenario is even worth entertaining. So he is either doctor or scum.
I’ve yet to hear a truly compelling reason why this NK is more likely to come from scum!Ceejay than from scum!xwing. Honestly, if anyone other than you was scum xwing, I fully believe I would be dead, because there is no logical reason for anyone other than yourself to kill a VT. We’ve got one confirmed tpr (me) and another tpr who people still find to be scummy (Ceejay), and yet we are both still alive. This makes the most sense only if xwing is scum, because you physically couldn’t kill the confirmed tpr (me) and you wanted to setup the other tpr who people still find to be scummy (Ceejay) for a mislynch.-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
OK, so do any of you seriously think the last remaining is NOT xwing or Ceejay? I would like everyone to consider the following:
1) Mislynching Ceejay (as doctor) hasmuch more severe consequencesthan mislynching xwing (as VT). If Ceejay is mislynched and flips doctor, then guess what happens on night 3? I get nightkilled, we lose both town power roles, and worst of all NOTHING can be inferred from my nightkill. I mean think about it – if Ceejay flips doctor, that proves we are in A2 and there is a mafia roleblocker, so REGARDLESS of who I target and jail, ANY of you could still nightkill me by simply roleblocking me and killing me. Thus, no one could even be cleared as confirmed town through my nightkill. So we lose BOTH town power roles, and my nightkill cannot even be used to clear anyone. How is that good for going into mylo and lylo?
2) On the other hand, think about what happens if we mislynch xwing. Xwing is still my top scum suspect, but if he is not scum then I believe Ceejay is.If xwing flips VT, then on night 3 I can jail Ceejay. Remember that if Ceejay is scum, that means we are in C2 (since there has been no doctor CC) and there is NO mafia roleblocker. Thus, if I jail Ceejay on night 3 and he is scum, this 100% guarantees there won’t be a nightkill on night 3. To test and make sure this wasn’t some BS no-kill gambit, we could even all vote no lynch on day 4, and I jail Ceejay again on night 4, and we see if there is no nightkill again on night 4. Rinse and repeat as much as necessary. Do you guys see where I am going with this? If Ceejay turns out to be scum,we really leave him no out, because I can literally make it impossible for him to nightkill. So if my scumreads are way off and both xwing AND Ceejay are somehow both town, then eventually the last remaining scum will be forced to nightkill someone – and this will at least clear Ceejay, who could not possibly perform the nightkill (as a mafia goon) if I am jailing him. So the best case scenario is Ceejay is scum, which we can test with several days of voting no lynch (followed by no night kill), and the worst case here is that he isn’t scum, but the inevitable nightkill at least clears Ceejay as being town.
So please think about this. Xwing is absolutely the best lynch when you take all of this into account. There is a tremendous amount of risk in lynching Ceejay today.-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
There is no way that would happen, though. If I jail you and a nightkill still happens while you're jailed, it's literally 100% proof that you aren't scum. Not 99%, 100%. Because it's been established that you are either 1) town doctor or 2) mafia goon. Aside from myself (as confirmed JK),In post 600, ceejayvinoya wrote:The thing that's wrong with volxen's plan is that rb will just keep NKing until town decides to lynch me. Sigh.
I kinda think that the best way to progress is to have me lynched anyway, since there will always be doubt on my slot.
This would mean volxen dies tonight tho.you are the one person in this game who CANNOT be a mafia roleblocker-- because that would imply that there is another town power role out there, and they would have counter claimed by now to prove that you are scum. So if I jail you and a nightkill still happens, you automatically becomeconfirmed town and unlynchable. Period.
I will also point out that you, Ceejay, are the only person I can clear as confirmed town by jailing. Because if anyone else besides yourself is scum, they are the mafia roleblocker, and thus cannot be cleared by me jailing them.
And either way, my plan guarantees that at least one town power role makes it to day 4. If you are a mafia gown, there is a 100% chance that there will be no nightkill on night 3 since I would be jailing you. If you are town doctor, then the mafia roleblocker cannot kill both of us on night 3.
As I've mentioned previously in post 509, xwing's slot has a lot of scum equity and he certainly has strange interactions with both Horror and Sky. In addition, he is the one person who was onLynching Ceejay at this point in the game is a horrendous idea and I will NOT support it.ALL THREEof the major L-1 day 1 wagons: Thor's wagons, Ceejay's wagon, and then my wagon. This is why, as I said before, I believe that the scumteam is most likely xwing/Sky. I do still believe that lynching xwing to see his flip is the optimal play for town to make today, but no lynching at this point would be better than lynching Ceejay.-
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
@Thor, did you meanIn post 602, Thor665 wrote:volxen (4) - NotNova, ceejayvinoya, xwing, Reundo
ceejayvinoya (2) - Thor665, volxen
angel7399 (1) - RCEnigma
Not Voting (2) - Haylen, Skygazer
@Reundo - this is the big vote count that's bugging me.
Since we know for a fact that Volx is scum I would be beyond amazed if zero scum were willing to vote for him right here.
Nova was town.
That leaves, Ceejay, and yourself - I'd wager $20 our last scum is one of you three.RCE
RCE kinda feels town, Ceejay feels scum but has a claim on the table, that leaves you - ergo you become a top lynch option for me today., Ceejay, and Reundo? CT[RCE] was never on my wagon, which was one of the reasons why I previously said that a CT[RCE]/Sky scumteam is extremely unlikely, because it would mean that my wagon was an all-town wagon. xwing, Ceejay, and Reundo are the three living players that were on my wagon.xwing
-