No this is not a RVS vote.
Yes, I do already hard scum read him.
Yes, I will tunnel on this all game
Because so far, I do not think that I have had a single correct scum read in any completed game I have played in, and at the gate there is a 66% chance that I will automatically know the alignment of every player in my groupIn post 130, absinthe wrote:What drives that preference?In post 128, Lukewarm wrote:I think that I personally would prefer the Gate. But there appears to be a discussion on the best way to assign people to groups, so I can wait for that conversation to happen before I lock in my choice
Wait. It would only be 50% ...In post 132, Lukewarm wrote:Because so far, I do not think that I have had a single correct scum read in any completed game I have played in, and at the gate there is a 66% chance that I will automatically know the alignment of every player in my groupIn post 130, absinthe wrote:What drives that preference?In post 128, Lukewarm wrote:I think that I personally would prefer the Gate. But there appears to be a discussion on the best way to assign people to groups, so I can wait for that conversation to happen before I lock in my choice
Spoiler:
In post 133, Lukewarm wrote:Wait. It would only be 50% ...In post 132, Lukewarm wrote:Because so far, I do not think that I have had a single correct scum read in any completed game I have played in, and at the gate there is a 66% chance that I will automatically know the alignment of every player in my groupIn post 130, absinthe wrote:What drives that preference?In post 128, Lukewarm wrote:I think that I personally would prefer the Gate. But there appears to be a discussion on the best way to assign people to groups, so I can wait for that conversation to happen before I lock in my choice
Spoiler:
I have completed 2 games on this site (and I am in another).In post 138, Briar wrote:Hey Luke, what's your experience with mafia?
I may have exaggerated my anti-confidence for comedic effect. It is more like, I am becoming aware that my experience, primarily in ONUW, which is played face-to-face with friends and family, does not translate 1 to 1 to playing here.In post 153, Briar wrote:Oh so you've like, played a lot. Huh.In post 143, Lukewarm wrote:I have completed 2 games on this site (and I am in another).In post 138, Briar wrote:Hey Luke, what's your experience with mafia?
Before that, I played several games in this mafia discord group that was full of people I knew IRL
And before that, I played a lot of One Night Ultimate Werewolf. Like I would guess at least 100 games, if not more.
But that means most of my experience is with playing with people that I know IRL, and people that I know well. So I felt like I was really good at reading people in those games, but so far on here...
If you're this unconfident I think I want to keep you out of the Gate-group, yeah. If you're town you'd most likely get slapped on the IC role and would be a lot of pressure, and if you're scum I feel like you'd be nervous enough where... it'd be good to be in the Wall group or something where it's just traditional mafia and the two town have to find each other to pick you out as the odd one.
I guess that you could be in any group as scum and it'd just shave off a person that we have to worry about, but really if you're town I think I'd rather have someone more experienced with the players (sorry if I'm like, assuming too little of your play right now) be there to guide us.
What do you think so far like, in general, of the people/what's been said? Do you have a preference between the other two, if you're doubting going to the Gate?
From my understanding, we each only get to vote for the minigame we are in, but we can all comment on all of the minigames. So the IC from the gate can try to help the people in the keep, ectIn post 163, Infinity 324 wrote:I take back what I said about my scumreads mattering, I didn't realize we all got to vote on all the minigames. I still feel like the wall is the place where obvtowning is the least important (because if you're not conftown at the gate, you need to obvtown to not get limmed, and at the keep you need to obvtown to get voted). Unwnd why do you i disagree?
For me, in the Keep, there are two win conditions for me.In post 164, Briar wrote:Ohh, the classic self-deprecation. I get that.In post 159, Lukewarm wrote: I may have exaggerated my anti-confidence for comedic effect. It is more like, I am becoming aware that my experience, primarily in ONUW, which is played face-to-face with friends and family, does not translate 1 to 1 to playing here.
Also, I have reconsidered, I don't think I should be in the Gate. Before the game started, I was only thinking about them individually, and not thinking about the fact that the IC would be important for the other areas as well.
So I think my preference now would be keep>wall>gate
What makes you want to go to the Keep? I have few guesses but I wanna hear what's on your mind about that one. :>
Also, is it influenced at all by you having a read on me, since I'm at the Keep?
In post 206, Infinity 324 wrote:Wow am I really alone as a non-anime avi? >.<In post 203, Anastasia wrote:This is ironic because your avatar is also anime <3In post 126, Something_Smart wrote:okay the anime avis are starting to get to me ngl
Not sure how to feel about this, because last game you scum read every post I made all the way up to MeLo.In post 193, catboi wrote:Okay, thoughts readswise:
I like unwnd's early energy
I townread Infinity's 52 - something about that mindset fees like it's coming from town
I think Lukewarm's posts have been solidly town and he'd be my first pick for someone to send to the wall right now
No particular scum pings yet
Oooo. This is not something I had realized. Could make for some interesting plays Day 2.In post 289, Marashu wrote: [*]When a minigame is resolved, all 3 players in that minigame flip. They may no longer post in the main thread or mafia PT.[/*]
[/list][/color]
Not sure what is defined as "non-standard." I have played a game with a cult in it, and I have played a game with 2 mafia groups. I guess those are non-standard?In post 316, absinthe wrote:Luke, do you have much experience with non-standard mafia game setups?
I don't know that I agree that it only matters where we put out top town reads. I was thinking about how we can organize the groups, and if we put our collective top scum reads in the same area, we can analyze the mafia switch.In post 305, catboi wrote:I got into that in 167, put your townreads in the keep, do whatever for the others. I think trying to game the IC at the gate is a bit of a waste of time, mafia are going to choose who they want as IC no matter what so it's not like they can be forced into making a bad choice. I'm mostly indifferent to how people arrange themselves in the other two.In post 300, absinthe wrote:What are your thoughts about how to use the 3 minigames?
I was actually going to type a bit more but I want to save those thoughts until after the assignments are finalized.
In post 305, catboi wrote: I got into that in 167, put your townreads in the keep, do whatever for the others.
Hmmm. The fact that you are already locked into the Keep, makes me apprehensive for you to pick the other people in the Keep with you. Because, if you are scum, that means you are picking out the the people you think you can most trick into town reading you.In post 322, Briar wrote:Thinking a bit, in a perfect world I think my groups right now would look like this:
Gate: Absinthe/Anastasia/Catboi
Wall: Unwnd/Dunnstral/Something_Smart
Keep: Briar/Lukewarm/Infinity
I think Unwnd/Infinity are interchangeable for the last two, but the Gate group would resolve a few of my reads? Like, confirming whether or not absinthe/Ana is T/T or T/S (because if it's S/S What The Fuck) would be important to me, and also it'd be nice if that was the case because I haven't gotten anything really Good from catboi yet and seeing whether or not he was confirmed would be cool. (This is also the assumption that the mafia would make the conversation between the former keep on going to the death? I think? Like there's already some uh, doubts between absinthe/Ana that they've vocalized so duh mafia preys on that.) This is the group with maximum WIFOM fuckery though so I worry that I'd get snowed pretty fast were mafia to divert from this but I'm gonna assume they'd play it sort of straightforward despite me talking about all this stuff out loud.
For the wall group, that's honestly the group where I'm like... could be any alignment, and I wouldn't be too surprised? I lean town on unwnd, actually, I townread unwnd now that I think about it a little bit just from how he's been playing even if I was questioning the 'why' he was trying to be so... diplomatic? I guess? It doesn't feel slimy like he's trying to placate people so much as just... figure shit out, so far. Which is nice. The latter two I have less experience with and in general don't find easy reads, so resolving that is a bit out of my paygrade. I am curious still about S_S's guess on me and why it bothered him, because he didn't say anything about it more and while I appreciate him not outting it for fear it's correct, it's a little... IDK. I guess my expectation was that he'd engage me even if my reply to him was very silly, because if it's something he was worrying about a bit he'd attempt to resolve it somehow.
And the last group, I Am Town, Luke has felt good so far and I do think that like, while he's not new to the site, the format itself is something he's still adjusting to and trying to keep up as mafia while in a group playing the Townie Pageant Game would probably be hell for him. If he's town he feels like he's the safest vote for us to pick and if he's scum he'll probably slip or something and we just vote either myself or Infinity if she's in here with us, and it's easy from there on.
As for order of who we let stay first, I think that (in the little world I am creating here) I'd let Wall > Keep > Gate do their votes? Actually, uh, probably Keep first now that I am thinking about it because if we're all voting for townreads and this is somehow the group that gets messed up and votes mafia, it'd be important to reset assuming we'd placed at that point a decent amount of trust into their reads. The IC should stick around as long as needed to dictate everything obviously, but now that I'm working through it I am very much into the Keep going first unless we all collectively agree one person is /disgustingly/ townie (sidenote: hey I'm the disgustingly townie one lol) and wanna see their reads or something pending a Wall-flip.
My brain is not functioning after typing this. Please enjoy.
I'm thinking of it more as an information gathering strategy.In post 325, catboi wrote:I suppose you can try, but I'm not sure how useful it's likely to be. But I'm a little bit fatalistic about the idea of trying to corral scumreads in this phase. I suppose it can't hurt to try?In post 323, Lukewarm wrote:I don't know that I agree that it only matters where we put out top town reads. I was thinking about how we can organize the groups, and if we put our collective top scum reads in the same area, we can analyze the mafia switch.In post 305, catboi wrote:I got into that in 167, put your townreads in the keep, do whatever for the others. I think trying to game the IC at the gate is a bit of a waste of time, mafia are going to choose who they want as IC no matter what so it's not like they can be forced into making a bad choice. I'm mostly indifferent to how people arrange themselves in the other two.In post 300, absinthe wrote:What are your thoughts about how to use the 3 minigames?
I was actually going to type a bit more but I want to save those thoughts until after the assignments are finalized.
I don't know how it is best to distribute the scum reads, like should we pick out our top 3, or just put our top 2 in the same area, and I'm still thinking about which area would be best to do this experiment. Would love for us to talk about this lol
But basically, I don't like the idea
In post 305, catboi wrote: I got into that in 167, put your townreads in the keep, do whatever for the others.
I don't think I responded before. I feel like there is a lot of noise in the thread, making it hard for me to get a read on several people on a blind read through, so I wasn't sure what I thought when you asked me the first time.In post 332, Briar wrote:I mean, I don't expect everyone to go 9/9 with my same exact reads, but it's the configuration I think gives us the best odds right now of sorting the trickier spots in this game.In post 330, Lukewarm wrote:Hmmm. The fact that you are already locked into the Keep, makes me apprehensive for you to pick the other people in the Keep with you. Because, if you are scum, that means you are picking out the the people you think you can most trick into town reading you.
I personally want to go to the keep as well, but I think that means we should let the rest of the thread pick our third.
Are you apprehensive about me picking you? My assumption would be that if you're town that wouldn't be as much of a worry for you -- as a less experienced player (but still one who has experience with mafia) you shouldn't fumble I think? As town to the point where other people don't townread you, and I've already ceded the fact that as it stands I'd be fine voting you if that was the consensus. Also, do you have any read on me independent of me picking these things? (I think I prodded at this earlier but I am a little too lazy to go back through your ISO right now to see if you said anything about it.)
I think she said that that would be meIn post 361, Anastasia wrote:Briar who do you want to put in the Keep with you as a backup?
My bad. I just saw that her suggestion was [Her + me + one other flexible slot]. and then went on to say I "have felt good so far" and that "that as it stands she'd be fine voting me"In post 363, Anastasia wrote:I don't think that was clear from her post at all.
Ideally I want to put two UTRs in the keep to guarantee a win there.
Now I am curious, how are you reading me?In post 363, Anastasia wrote:I don't think that was clear from her post at all.
Ideally I want to put two UTRs in the keep to guarantee a win there.
I am not sure what "shortest reset period" means?In post 366, absinthe wrote:This may be the shortest reset period in my mafia career.
and this may be my last post of the night.
....
In post 361, Anastasia wrote:Briar who do you want to put in the Keep with you as a backup?
In post 370, Briar wrote:Lukewarm's my backup, yes.
I have no reason right now to think he isn't town. And if he isn't town, I think that when we get down to the nitty-gritty he'd probably slip and show his hand (especially if we sorted in the Wall group first where he'd be forced to take stances).
Like, you acted started the conversation like you cared who other people thought should be in the keep, but even though the person you asked said something different, you decided to lock yourself in regardless.
I know the swap mechanic exists, however, the majority of town players are going to end up where they vote today. Mafia can swap either 1 or 2 town players, dependent on if they manage to get an even spread today. So 66-83% of all town players are going to end up where they vote today.In post 479, unwnd wrote:Are you not paying attention to what's being said right now when it comes to the swap mechanic?In post 476, Lukewarm wrote:Question for the thread. Should I vote myself into the keep? Like can I get a count on who is on board with that?
I think that that is the best place to put me, and Briar made a decent case for me going there as well. But now that 2 of the slots are locked in, I am worried that if I wait, I will end up somewhere else.
Really,In post 490, Anastasia wrote:I think if you were to come into the keep you would need Briar's permission at this point unless you want to commit to voting me/briar throughIn post 476, Lukewarm wrote:Question for the thread. Should I vote myself into the keep? Like can I get a count on who is on board with that?
I think that that is the best place to put me, and Briar made a decent case for me going there as well. But now that 2 of the slots are locked in, I am worried that if I wait, I will end up somewhere else.
Then maybe I am missing something from the discussion about the swap mechanic. I have said I wanted to end up in the keep since like page 6 of the thread. I thought you were saying "you know, you might be swapped out even if you go there." and my response was "I know that that is a possibility, but I am most likely to end up there if I start there.In post 495, unwnd wrote:I'm not sure where this ties in with why you wanted to move to the KeepIn post 491, Lukewarm wrote:I know the swap mechanic exists, however, the majority of town players are going to end up where they vote today. Mafia can swap either 1 or 2 town players, dependent on if they manage to get an even spread today. So 66-83% of all town players are going to end up where they vote today.In post 479, unwnd wrote:Are you not paying attention to what's being said right now when it comes to the swap mechanic?In post 476, Lukewarm wrote:Question for the thread. Should I vote myself into the keep? Like can I get a count on who is on board with that?
I think that that is the best place to put me, and Briar made a decent case for me going there as well. But now that 2 of the slots are locked in, I am worried that if I wait, I will end up somewhere else.
Okay, I ran through all of the possibilities if we now commit to this plan - Ana choses the 3rd player to enter the Keep, and commits to voting which ever of the two is left with her in the Keep after the switch (and if she tries to back out, we all assume she is scum claiming) - to see how it would play out.In post 496, Briar wrote:Actually, it's probably better for Ana to pick who she wants in the final slot? If she's in fact wanting to vote someone other than herself it should be someone she's confident in.
I think I agree. We only need two in there, 1 as the main vote choice, and 1 as the back-up in case the main vote is swapped out.In post 540, Something_Smart wrote:Putting 3 towny players in the Keep seems like a massive wasteIn post 533, absinthe wrote:I'm ok with going to the Keep.
In post 93, Anastasia wrote:Well if you become as blazingly townie as you promise, then it would make sense to send the scummy/nully people to the keep with you right?In post 84, Briar wrote:I think the point is more that it's probably objectively the Worst to send the hard to reads to the Keep because if they're all like, in that place where scum end up a lot of null-town/townleany it's a fucking headache to deal with.
In post 363, Anastasia wrote:I don't think that was clear from her post at all.
Ideally I want to put two UTRs in the keep to guarantee a win there.
Ana, I am interested by the fact that your opinion on the Keep seems to have evolved from suggesting we put exactly 1 UTR in the keep, to saying the ideal would be 2 UTRs in the Keep, to deciding the best course of action would be for you to add yourself + your top town read, such that you are 100% sure all 3 players in the Keep are town.In post 379, Anastasia wrote:I believe Absinthe/Me/You are all town.
So the scum would have to sub one of us out and put a scum in keep if they get 2-1 in the other 2 areas.
its very unlikely imo that the keep group can stay at me-absi-you, but if it does i'll deal with that situation when it comes up.
I think I agree with this idea, but I wish we had done this at the Wall instead of at the Keep.In post 548, absinthe wrote:My thought is that putting 3 town (very likely town) into the keep forces the Mafia to use one of their swaps there. And the lack of the swap if that were to happen would force a massive reset on all of town, which would be crucial to not screwing up day 2.
I am curious why you would be adamantly against it.In post 614, absinthe wrote:We're not doing this if I have anything to say about it.In post 612, Lukewarm wrote:Wall: Me, Unwnd, Absinthe (aye, a repeat of our last game together )
I'm curious what made you decide scum reads should go to the wall? That is the one where we have to find the scum without an IC in there. If we put 3 people we are already suspicious of in there, wouldn't that increase the chances that we miselim there?In post 627, Infinity 324 wrote:To be clear, this is what I think is optimal. Townreads at the keep, scumreads at the wall, nullreads at the gate.In post 601, Infinity 324 wrote:Honestly I feel pretty good about my TRs on briar and ana, which means I think I like putting someone I also TR strongly at the keep. Absinthe would not be that player for me, but I do feel better about her than I did before.
The chances of any specific group of 3 being town is about 18% if I did my math right, which seems like something that's reasonable to try and go for. I also feel like it's reasonable to try and go for putting 2 scum in the same group (probably the wall) if we can. Then the gate could contain some null reads. Thoughts?
I think that this thought process is the one I most vibe with on a cursory read through.In post 630, Something_Smart wrote:I kind of answered that here:In post 623, Anastasia wrote:so my question to you is what is optimal then?I'm not vehemently opposed to Infinity's idea, but I feel like I would prefer this: 2 townreads + 1 nullread at the Keep, any remaining strong townreads at the Wall, then fill out the Wall with the scummiest players and put the rest at the Gate.In post 620, Something_Smart wrote:I think the bottom line is that we want the Gate to have all the scummiest players after the swap (I THINK? I may try to math this out honestly because it's a costly thing to get wrong), and we want the Keep to have exactly one towny player after the swap. It's not totally clear what the best way to achieve that is, or even if there is a good way.
The reasoning being: you need exactly 2 known townies to guarantee victory at the Keep. The third is superfluous, and we might as well put a hard-to-read player there instead. Putting a known townie at the Gate meanwhile makes it trivial for the scum to give us no information with the IC reveal. (At least make them work, if they want to do that.) So, we put other townreads at the Wall. Then, we don't want to stuff the Gate with scummy people because that gives scum more control over who gets IC'd, so we put the other scummy people at the Wall (which we would be happy to turn into a 50/50 since it's the hardest minigame) and the rest at the Gate.
But I was townreading you hereIn post 649, absinthe wrote:I really don't need the trauma. Given the reads on the table in that game, I recognise it probably wasn't town-winnable, but it was the first game in over 5 years that I was miselimed in elo, and I'd have to go back nearly another 5 years for another game where I was the game-losing miselim.In post 624, Lukewarm wrote:I am curious why you would be adamantly against it.In post 614, absinthe wrote:We're not doing this if I have anything to say about it.In post 612, Lukewarm wrote:Wall: Me, Unwnd, Absinthe (aye, a repeat of our last game together )
Like the one game the 3 of us played together in, was also my first game with you or unwnd (and my first game on this site period). If we were doing a repeat grouping, I would be a bit more equipped to handle it I think. I would be going in with two players that I have experience with personally, and 2 players I have seen interact together as well. Which is better then me going to the gate (and being IC'ed) with two people I have never played with imo
You're not townreading me here, so why should I expect a better outcome?
I like this game design because 1) I can't be N1K'd and 2) there are two minigames that don't involve the standard ELO.
I was against it, because I had a scum lean on Ana before she locked herself in, and as a knee jerk reaction, I thought "I should not let her single handedly decide the make up of the Keep" and almost locked myself in for the sole reason of denying her the set up she wanted. But when I stopped and examined how her suggestion would play out (Post 511), I concluded that even though I did not like the play she made, it was probably coming from town.In post 654, absinthe wrote:then I don't understand why you were against briar/anastasia/me in the keep. Can you clarify that?In post 652, Lukewarm wrote:But I was townreading you here
In post 235, catboi wrote: really I just don't want to be in the same location as you, no hard feelings I swear~ (jkjk)
In post 614, absinthe wrote:We're not doing this if I have anything to say about it.In post 612, Lukewarm wrote:Wall: Me, Unwnd, Absinthe (aye, a repeat of our last game together )
To be fully honest, I had you as a town lean, not a hard read, but it was primarily your earlier interactions with Ana. Which is also when I put Ana as a scum lean. This quote from Briar felt like she was reading my mind on the exchange tbhIn post 673, absinthe wrote:Why are you townreading me in this game?In post 662, Lukewarm wrote:I was against it, because I had a scum lean on Ana before she locked herself in, and as a knee jerk reaction, I thought "I should not let her single handedly decide the make up of the Keep" and almost locked myself in for the sole reason of denying her the set up she wanted. But when I stopped and examined how her suggestion would play out (Post 511), I concluded that even though I did not like the play she made, it was probably coming from town.In post 654, absinthe wrote:then I don't understand why you were against briar/anastasia/me in the keep. Can you clarify that?In post 652, Lukewarm wrote:But I was townreading you here
Basically, I was thinking about the suggestion in terms of Ana being the person making it, and not in terms of you being in her suggestion.
In post 297, Briar wrote:there's a bit of me that wonders if Ana's bit off a bit much for her to chew if she is scum and is trying to placate absinthe who was not having it if that is the case
I mean, I am slightly offended by that tbh. I did think about it, like I considered my how I would feel if neither of you were swapped out, and I also thought about what it would mean for me if one of you were - I just did not voice those thoughts because I was told that having that information out in the thread would be detrimental to town.In post 691, unwnd wrote:That's rainchecked for now
It felt a bit (without offending) like an excited child. I don't think he really thought through what it would mean to either of us and just sort of threw it out there. Do you think that lack of consideration is more telling of him as scum?
Specifically, if Briar is unsure about having her+ana be the vote block in the keep, think I might be the best person to go there??In post 640, Briar wrote:Hmm. True.
There's just a small part of me that doesn't trust her despite everything because as a player I feel this is the sort of thing she would do as scum so holding her accountable to her willingness to vote someone who's not herself makes me more comfortable with her. Like, I'm pre-emptively neutering her as scum.
But I guess that her willingness to do that only extended to me/absinthe I think?
Like, hm.
No, I was already thinking that, based on two things.In post 693, unwnd wrote:Is your reconsideration only because of what I said just now?In post 692, Lukewarm wrote:I mean, I am slightly offended by that tbh. I did think about it, like I considered my how I would feel if neither of you were swapped out, and I also thought about what it would mean for me if one of you were - I just did not voice those thoughts because I was told that having that information out in the thread would be detrimental to town.
Regardless, I am reconsidering my suggestion.
I thought me going to the keep was pointless if we already had a Briar+Ana vote block there, but if Briar is uncomfortable letting that be the vote block, then then it would make sense again for me to go.In post 636, Lukewarm wrote:I am actually leaning towards locking myself in to the Wall at the moment.
Now that Briar + Ana are already locked into the Keep, I think the strategic benefit of me going there is a bit lost. And I do not want to go to the Gate, because I would prefer not to be the IC if possible.
Honestly, I feel like a lot of the back and forth in this thread has been around meta commentary on other players and self-meta analysis, and I am personally not a big fan of those discussions. Both because I have the least experience with other players in this lobby, and because I prefer to focus on the the game we are actually in. So there is a whole lot of content being put out there that I am both unequipped and uninterested in grappling with ¯\_(ツ)_/¯In post 700, unwnd wrote:I think the best for me to determine your alignment is to understand what you feel most strongly about, Luke. You've been one of my nulls for a good while because I think you're just a blip right now. Again, not trying to offend. It's just clear to me there are bigger people talking bigger things and then you're trying to get your two cents in. Maybe your averse reaction to me is a sign that you took offense because thatiswhat you felt most strongly about
Also, do you feel like I had a particularly adverse reaction to you?In post 700, unwnd wrote:Maybe your averse reaction to me is a sign that you took offense because that is what you felt most strongly about
In post 711, Dunnstral wrote:I was under the impression that neither of you wanted to be in the keepIn post 708, absinthe wrote:Have you missed that both Luke and I want to be in the keep?In post 705, Dunnstral wrote:If Briar and Anastasia are both town, Why doesn't anybody care/want to be in the keep? Shouldn't mafia want to put a member in there so they can swap more effectively?
In post 696, absinthe wrote:In post 692, Lukewarm wrote:I still want to go to the keep.In post 691, unwnd wrote:Specifically, if Briar is unsure about having her+ana be the vote block in the keep, think I might be the best person to go there??In post 640, Briar wrote:Hmm. True.
There's just a small part of me that doesn't trust her despite everything because as a player I feel this is the sort of thing she would do as scum so holding her accountable to her willingness to vote someone who's not herself makes me more comfortable with her. Like, I'm pre-emptively neutering her as scum.
But I guess that her willingness to do that only extended to me/absinthe I think?
Like, hm.
I may be wrong, but I think I have been townread by over half the lobby, so maybe I would make sense to be that person.
Unless people object to that / have a better candidate?
If you preempt that, I'll likely cast a grumpy Vote Gate immediately, and then I probably stew in my concerns about a Dun/catboi/me Gate trio unless/until reality overtakes that.
I think that Ana is town, and personally am okay with the Briar+Ana vote block. But if Briar is serious about not wanting that to be the vote block, then I think I am the best candidate to go.In post 713, Dunnstral wrote:you guys both think that Ana is town or no?
This was similar to my suggestion, until Briar mentioned being unsure about letting Ana vote for themselves if she is swapped out.In post 714, Dunnstral wrote:I'm trying to figure out why you wouldn't want to put someone you scumread in the keep
If you are 100% right on all 3 members of the scum team, this wins. If you are wrong on any one of them, this setup makes the Wall much harder to win.In post 720, Anastasia wrote:I'd like to take a shot on infinity-ss-unwnd as the scum team because I am a naive dreamer.In post 714, Dunnstral wrote:I'm trying to figure out why you wouldn't want to put someone you scumread in the keep
And that is because I was told not to explain everything too much in advanceIn post 723, unwnd wrote:I did. I felt your decision was impulsive and the last time we talked I didn't have a true grasp of why you wanted the pairings you did. Or why you wanted to jump in. My understanding is that you're mostly using the minigames as a way of sorting who you like and don't like, and that you'd prefer to be with people that you do? Like in the sense of 'i townread them'.In post 703, Lukewarm wrote:Also, do you feel like I had a particularly adverse reaction to you?In post 700, unwnd wrote:Maybe your averse reaction to me is a sign that you took offense because that is what you felt most strongly about
You said you did not think that I thought about my suggestion, And I responded with a post to trying to state that I did think about my suggestion.
If anything, I was hopping that would make you more likely to engage with my suggestions, then if you were left to believe that my suggestions are made without thought behind them.
In post 728, Anastasia wrote:In post 727, Something_Smart wrote:If me, Infinity, and unwnd don't all end up at different locations post-swap, then we are 100% ruled out as a team. So if scum don't ensure that we do all end up at different locations, you got your wish at eliminating that team, without having to strongarm the locations. And if scum do ensure that we all end up at different locations, it means they couldn't use their swap to do whatever else they wanted to do.
ok but why wouldn't the scum want to put you three in different locations?
I mean, I have already said that my opinion on that combination has already changed, so you don't need to convince me.In post 731, unwnd wrote:I am of the same opinion of absin that I would very much dread a 3-way thereIn post 729, Lukewarm wrote:And that is because I was told not to explain everything too much in advanceIn post 723, unwnd wrote:I did. I felt your decision was impulsive and the last time we talked I didn't have a true grasp of why you wanted the pairings you did. Or why you wanted to jump in. My understanding is that you're mostly using the minigames as a way of sorting who you like and don't like, and that you'd prefer to be with people that you do? Like in the sense of 'i townread them'.In post 703, Lukewarm wrote:Also, do you feel like I had a particularly adverse reaction to you?In post 700, unwnd wrote:Maybe your averse reaction to me is a sign that you took offense because that is what you felt most strongly about
You said you did not think that I thought about my suggestion, And I responded with a post to trying to state that I did think about my suggestion.
If anything, I was hopping that would make you more likely to engage with my suggestions, then if you were left to believe that my suggestions are made without thought behind them.
I thought through it, and placed people based on which combinations I thought would either give us the most information from the mafia swam or from the IC choice, and leave each minigame most likely to be won by town.
I was quite honestly surprised when it ended up with the three of us together, because I definitely did not go into sorting with that in mind.
In post 674, Lukewarm wrote:In post 235, catboi wrote: really I just don't want to be in the same location as you, no hard feelings I swear~ (jkjk)In post 614, absinthe wrote:We're not doing this if I have anything to say about it.In post 612, Lukewarm wrote:Wall: Me, Unwnd, Absinthe (aye, a repeat of our last game together )
I am become pariah
That was supposed to be a joke, but maybe IIn post 731, unwnd wrote: I am of the same opinion of absin that I would very much dread a 3-way there
Why?In post 739, Dunnstral wrote:If I were scum and Briar/Ana were both town, I'd already be in the KeepIn post 736, unwnd wrote:So.
What I said about 'there has to be scum in Briar/Absin/Ana' didn't really get as much attention as I'd thought. Sure Absin talked about it with me but that's because she's apart of it. It's just more likely you respond to someone calling your name out regardless of alignment. I finally got a decent nap in so I just want to say I feel a bit more prepared. I'm not willing to call all 3 town but do I agree with the majority on Ana. The initial interaction with her was my own impetus. I don't really think Ana comes in ready to die as scum and hopes the gambit just works out. She basically would have to assume Absin/Briar would feel bad for her and tinfoil the other. I also think everyone's response to her claims makes me believe she doesn't really have partners to go along with the "Plan" either. I don't really know where she sees me/s_s/infinity and my biggest guess would be that she thinks S_S is frustrated that Briar/Absin/Ana all happened to find each other as town. Placing those 3 in 'have to have scum together' was more of a comfort to me as I didn't want to believe S_S/Infinity/Lukewarm/Catboi/Dunn comprised a whole scumteam. Mind you there's more than 3 there. I still don't really feel that way, even if the person I suspect the most out of there is catboi.
Okay... But why would you, as scum do it?In post 753, Dunnstral wrote:And if I do scum claim, what are you going to do about it?In post 750, Infinity 324 wrote:It's not town-motivated at all to lock in a vote without discussing here, especially since it encourages scum to do the same.In post 744, Dunnstral wrote:Go onIn post 742, Infinity 324 wrote:I'd treat this as a scumclaimIn post 739, Dunnstral wrote:If I were scum and Briar/Ana were both town, I'd already be in the Keep
Dude. If you just auto-locked yourself in right now, I feel like the consensus would be that you scumclaimed, and we would just move forward with "vote anyone but Dunn" and we would just win the mini game, regardless of the swap mechanic.In post 759, Dunnstral wrote:Did you forget about the swap mechanic?In post 757, Something_Smart wrote:ok but like if Briar and Ana are both town don't we want scum to take the last slot?
Please, please, explain to me the good point he made, because I missed it.In post 764, Anastasia wrote:I think it's a good point that Dunnstral raisesIn post 760, Lukewarm wrote:Okay... But why would you, as scum do it?
Like I feel like you are trying to make the point Briar+Ana can't both be town, because if they were both town, then a scum would have put themselves there already. But I am not following your logic, because I cannot figure out what the scum team would gain from making the play of locking themselves in there already.
however the scum team I proposed SS-Infinity are both not as bold as Dunnstral so I can see them choosing to not sacrifice themselves at the Keep in a daring ploy.