![Embarassed :oops:](./images/smilies/icon_redface.gif)
Pedit: OH I SEE HOW IT IS!
VOTE: votato
In post 58, SirCakez wrote:THIS
VOTE: lilith
VOTE: lilith
VOTE: lilith
VOTE: lilith
Yes I agree.In post 59, SirCakez wrote:Yes...just look at any of Radja's games lol. We used to call it the Radja day 1 curse, someone would always be lynched within 5 pages.In post 16, eyestott wrote:Has a lynch ever actually been achieved during RVS?
VOTE: S_S
serious vote
sadly I think you may have rolled scum my friend
In post 93, votato wrote:fair enough. I've taken a peek at a few recent games to give me some idea of what to expect. from what I've gleaned its basically several hundred pages of shitposting followed by random voting and whoever is the best at making up a compelling story controls the vote. you just hope that the storytellers are on your team.
nopeIn post 100, Something_Smart wrote:Lilith, I have a bad feeling that you don't know me as well as you think you do.
Yes and yes.In post 103, Paragon wrote:How well do you know Something_Smart? Did you see a gun sneaking out of his pocket?In post 102, lilith2013 wrote:nopeIn post 100, Something_Smart wrote:Lilith, I have a bad feeling that you don't know me as well as you think you do.
lynch this please
Lilith Gut ReadTM, a new system for reading people. Patent coming soon.In post 105, DonCorleone wrote:I have a mild townlean on Something_Smart. Lilith, why do you want to lynch there?
YesIn post 113, Something_Smart wrote:What am I, chopped liver?In post 107, DonCorleone wrote:Why does no-one have any interest in whether or not votato is town faking lack of knowledge of scum having a pt or scum faking it?
I’ll get back to you once my read is further substantiated on something you can defend then.In post 114, Something_Smart wrote:The downside of a gut read is that it's impossible to engage.
Yeah I guess so /shrugIn post 115, Something_Smart wrote:It's also very difficult to convince others of, but I guess that's working in my favor at the moment.
Hmm that’s not really what I meant, words are hardIn post 118, Something_Smart wrote:This almost sounds like you plan on scumreading whatever I say?In post 116, lilith2013 wrote:I’ll get back to you once my read is further substantiated on something you can defend then.
Ouch?In post 120, Something_Smart wrote:Man I feel like I'm back in 2016. And not the good kind of feeling like I'm back in 2016
@Don Corleone votato /inned as a newbie into the newbie queue so that implies this is not an altIn post 123, votato wrote:you might want to look into the other games im currently playing. cant provide details cuz im not sure how the rule about discussing ongoing games works. but i think i can say that im playing other games.In post 106, DonCorleone wrote:Also, not persuaded that votato isn’t an alt who doesn’t want to admit to being an alt.
remember how the rules mentioned challenges?
FG forgot to remove some of the dance game rulesIn post 109, Paragon wrote:It looks kinda fake honestly. He acknowledges the rules mention scum have a PT, but is still unsure and is innocently asking everyone.In post 21, votato wrote:the fact that firebringer hasnt claimed scum yet gives me a hard town read on him....
also, are we to believe that scum dont have a PT in this game? it mentions a PT in the rules during the night phase, but thats the only place i found it mentioned. the rules have already been noted as flawed tho. also, I'm getting dangerously close to not getting page 1 lynched. step it up!
Where were the rules noted as flawed?
I did warn you...In post 125, Something_Smart wrote:Sorry, but it's trueIn post 122, lilith2013 wrote:Ouch?Your new playstyle is, uh, somewhat more aggressive than you used to be.
he just mentioned there were ongoing games.... afaik that’s not breaking any rulesIn post 129, chkflip wrote:Don't talk about ongoing games votato.
Those slips are faker than pro wrestling wtf.
SS is probably the person I played in the most games with when I was on this site before.In post 132, Paragon wrote:He kinda indirectly implied some stuff though.In post 130, lilith2013 wrote:he just mentioned there were ongoing games.... afaik that’s not breaking any rulesIn post 129, chkflip wrote:Don't talk about ongoing games votato.
Those slips are faker than pro wrestling wtf.
What's the history between you and Something_Smart?
In post 51, DonCorleone wrote:My role PM is town and contains no flavour or detail. Yours does. Ipso facto, you are scum VOTE: chkflipIn post 49, chkflip wrote:Really love the flavor and detail in the role PMs.
EZ game, folks.
Exactly, in the same way that votato is obvscum for “townslipping”In post 174, Firebringer wrote:The detail and flavor in role pms are really good thoIn post 172, lilith2013 wrote:.................
I read 41 in the same way I read your 49. Dry, sarcastic humor. Dude.
NoIn post 184, Firebringer wrote:R u a gangster now?
What is this face for?In post 185, Something_Smart wrote:._.In post 181, lilith2013 wrote:Tbh I don’t trust ABR reads whatsoever so that basically means votato is conftown for me
This was originally sarcastic but whatever I plan to ignore all ABR readsIn post 181, lilith2013 wrote:Tbh I don’t trust ABR reads whatsoever so that basically means votato is conftown for me
Revising an opinion when you get new information, like, oh, actual confirmation from ABR that it was a legitimate vote, is called backtracking now?In post 189, chkflip wrote:Hard and immediate backtrack noted.
I’m not scumreading ABR atm. I’m just saying I put 0 stock in his reads.In post 191, farside22 wrote:I am immune to your sarcasm. It doesn't really win me over.In post 165, chkflip wrote:Oh man I better up my post count and talk about every little thing the moment it comes up or I'm scum.
Hahahaha
My vote does sell ABR for bussing and I gotta say farside I'm so proud of you for reading three words and interpreting themso well. I'm teary.
Of all the votes, Rammy's was the first that was legitimate. Why? What happened by page two (I think?) that made Rambalam to go "nah they scum"? If x, then y. And I'm absolutely going to help him bus his partner and go for him D2. I believe they're both scum as of that post and nothing has happened to change my mind there. It's pretty simple stuff but apparently it doesn't make sense to you so I have to hold your fucking hand. Cool.
51 reads like an extension of an RVS vote. That's so far from what I'd consider pressure that I forgot it even existed.
Can I introduce to a book called how to make friend and influence others?![]()
![]()
I think the whole idea that people are pushing for votato looks opportunistic and an excuse.
Is it early to make calls? Yup.
Do I care? Nope
Whatever moves the game out of RVS makes me a happy person.
MEEEOOOOWWWWWIn post 181, lilith2013 wrote:Tbh I don’t trust ABR reads whatsoever so that basically means votato is conftown for me
That said I would go for an ABR vote too.
Man, this is him all the time?In post 194, Firebringer wrote:Idk if u read chkflip posts in other games this is kind of just his personality ur seeing.In post 193, farside22 wrote:Still reading as trying too hard.In post 189, chkflip wrote:Hard and immediate backtrack noted.
Not really alignment indicative
No thanks. I’m way less excited about this game now.In post 198, Firebringer wrote:It’s a personality that grows on u.In post 197, lilith2013 wrote:Man, this is him all the time?In post 194, Firebringer wrote:Idk if u read chkflip posts in other games this is kind of just his personality ur seeing.In post 193, farside22 wrote:Still reading as trying too hard.In post 189, chkflip wrote:Hard and immediate backtrack noted.
Not really alignment indicative
From the games that I remember, ABR is an absolutely dominant force and just yells at people until he gets his way. I think it’s better for at least one person to not let themselves get pressured into joining ABR’s pushes. Do you disagree?In post 200, Something_Smart wrote:It's an unamused glare.In post 187, lilith2013 wrote:What is this face for?
ABR meant his vote the way chkflip read it, so I assumed I had misinterpreted it as a joke /shrugIn post 202, Paragon wrote:In post 177, Albert B. Rampage wrote:It is a legitmate vote for scum.Why does that make your point moot? I thought your point was valid and the importance of it stems from what Albert's voteIn post 179, lilith2013 wrote:Well then! My point is mootlookedlike, and it looked like a joke to me as well.
Why drop the issue so easily?
In post 180, Albert B. Rampage wrote:I am on this winwagon until the end, or until I sheep a better case.
NothingIn post 203, Firebringer wrote:Wow If ur not excited for face huggers latching onto u and growing on u. What even excites u?!In post 201, lilith2013 wrote:No thanks. I’m way less excited about this game now.
WeakIn post 218, Firebringer wrote:U smell.
Get on the viable wagon.
Ur reads are bad too. Just sheep me
I respectfully disagreeIn post 221, Firebringer wrote:Ur mom is weak.In post 220, lilith2013 wrote:WeakIn post 218, Firebringer wrote:U smell.
Get on the viable wagon.
Ur reads are bad too. Just sheep me
This sounds......... ominousIn post 240, Albert B. Rampage wrote:forcibly aligned