Micro 966 - DDD: DD? [game over!]
-
-
Alisae lolbalance
-
-
Alisae lolbalance
-
-
Alisae lolbalance
- lolbalance
- lolbalance
- Posts: 47098
- Joined: October 31, 2016
- Location: Cali~ (PST)
?????In post 11, Piergeiron the Paladinson wrote:Please refrain from using that word, Dongempire.| here.GTKAS-
-
Alisae lolbalance
-
-
Alisae lolbalance
-
-
Alisae lolbalance
-
-
Alisae lolbalance
- lolbalance
- lolbalance
- Posts: 47098
- Joined: October 31, 2016
- Location: Cali~ (PST)
-
-
Alisae lolbalance
- lolbalance
- lolbalance
- Posts: 47098
- Joined: October 31, 2016
- Location: Cali~ (PST)
its not about defending youIn post 30, Donempire wrote:
Hey, if it offends him, im fine using mob instigated beating. I dont need a defense.In post 18, Alisae wrote:does it offend you?
Thank you for making me realize the wrong of my ways sire.| here.GTKAS-
-
Alisae lolbalance
- lolbalance
- lolbalance
- Posts: 47098
- Joined: October 31, 2016
- Location: Cali~ (PST)
is this a jokeIn post 33, WindowsXP wrote:
Trying to case people in RVS? Scummy.In post 24, Hopkirk wrote:
You've got a lot of nerve just coming into the game making jokes instead of contributing anything. I'd give you a finger of suspicion, but that would make typing hard so I'm going to have to go with a vote instead. VOTE: Windows XPIn post 22, WindowsXP wrote:I suggest we use the term Uninstall. But perhaps I am just biased.| here.GTKAS-
-
Alisae lolbalance
- lolbalance
- lolbalance
- Posts: 47098
- Joined: October 31, 2016
- Location: Cali~ (PST)
why are you voting paladin here?In post 28, Grumpy Cat wrote:Being scum puts us in an argumentative state. I'm going to smite the holiness out of you, Paladin.
VOTE: Paladin| here.GTKAS-
-
Alisae lolbalance
- lolbalance
- lolbalance
- Posts: 47098
- Joined: October 31, 2016
- Location: Cali~ (PST)
-
-
Alisae lolbalance
- lolbalance
- lolbalance
- Posts: 47098
- Joined: October 31, 2016
- Location: Cali~ (PST)
oh so its nothing legitmate?
ok| here.GTKAS-
-
Alisae lolbalance
- lolbalance
- lolbalance
- Posts: 47098
- Joined: October 31, 2016
- Location: Cali~ (PST)
I like this post but atm I don't feel like flopz, hopkrik, and grumpy cat are scum together and thats all i got from pages 3-4In post 122, WindowsXP wrote:Hey I'm on break.
I get scumpings from Grumpy Cat,
Longpost will come after I am home.| here.GTKAS-
-
Alisae lolbalance
- lolbalance
- lolbalance
- Posts: 47098
- Joined: October 31, 2016
- Location: Cali~ (PST)
I feel like the game is probably better off being played like mountainous tbh. If anything, the way I was going to go into this game was to try to come up with as many logical pairings as I could and then try to figure out what works and what doesn't from there.In post 127, WindowsXP wrote:also ive been toying with the idea of NLing until D3 while i was working.
Cons: we lose a ML
Pros: getting within 2 scum is easier
Overall the mechanic makes a 2 scum lylo much more dangerous for scum since by then one scum has been poed minimum.
Would like to hear other's thoughts on this.| here.GTKAS-
-
Alisae lolbalance
-
-
Alisae lolbalance
- lolbalance
- lolbalance
- Posts: 47098
- Joined: October 31, 2016
- Location: Cali~ (PST)
I think Hopkirk shading Flopz isn't something that he would go out of his way to do if they were partners.
I don't think Hopkirk and Grumpy Cat's interactions on page 3-4 about Flopz is theater
And Grumpy Cat's vote on Flopz feels weird to me tbh. Grumpy Cat goes to apply pressure on that slot but Hopkirk is trying to pressure Windows atm.
Tho in writing this, this pops up in my mind
Thinking about this more its actually really weird. Its a conflict of interest but I don't know if its alignment indicative. Why shade a slot you're not trying to pressure? And wouldn't something like that be better to keep to yourself when the slot hasn't posted yet and you don't have information to go off of?In post 130, Alisae wrote:Hopkirk why did you shade Flopz?
Like it seems weird but what interest me is you shading Flopz but not wanting to put pressure onto them, but Grumpy Cat decides to put pressure on it.
Also in general, I feel like Grumpy Cat's actions here seem like they're indicative of reacting to the events happening around him and not really trying to put anything together himself? He jumps on the Flopz wagon to then be swayed by Hopkirk to join the Windows wagon and it just seems weird to me| here.GTKAS-
-
Alisae lolbalance
-
-
Alisae lolbalance
- lolbalance
- lolbalance
- Posts: 47098
- Joined: October 31, 2016
- Location: Cali~ (PST)
ok so why vote Flopz in the first place?In post 140, Grumpy Cat wrote:Flopz was never a serious vote
I'm confused| here.GTKAS-
-
Alisae lolbalance
- lolbalance
- lolbalance
- Posts: 47098
- Joined: October 31, 2016
- Location: Cali~ (PST)
how am i supposed to interpret this as a joke?In post 78, Grumpy Cat wrote:
Oh damn, I wouldn't be opposed to policy launching him then it becomes a serious issue? We should put some pressure on him to make sure he behaves.In post 73, Hopkirk wrote:
Idk. I don't really want to reread the game because he was so toxic in it that I really don't want to reread it (and the mod didn't update the first post with roles or anything smh).In post 69, Grumpy Cat wrote:Was he scum in that game, Hop? That's some useful meta, thanks.
VOTE: Flopz| here.GTKAS-
-
Alisae lolbalance
-
-
Alisae lolbalance
- lolbalance
- lolbalance
- Posts: 47098
- Joined: October 31, 2016
- Location: Cali~ (PST)
Do you think there's any value in this statement at all @Grumpy CatIn post 139, Alisae wrote:I think Hopkirk shading Flopz isn't something that he would go out of his way to do if they were partners.| here.GTKAS-
-
Alisae lolbalance
- lolbalance
- lolbalance
- Posts: 47098
- Joined: October 31, 2016
- Location: Cali~ (PST)
I'd figured that expressing my concerns and letting you address them would put more light on the situation and help me sort youIn post 155, Grumpy Cat wrote:New ping: Alisae getting oddly defensive when telling em it was a joke.
Why didn't you vote me if I felt off to you, Ali?| here.GTKAS-
-
Alisae lolbalance
- lolbalance
- lolbalance
- Posts: 47098
- Joined: October 31, 2016
- Location: Cali~ (PST)
ok but why would a scum!hopkirk go out of his way to shade his partner Flopz? Isn't it just completely unneeded to make a post like that?In post 157, Grumpy Cat wrote:
Not at all. I could totally see them as partners still. Or better said, nothing we've done has made them more or less likely to be partners.In post 154, Alisae wrote:
Do you think there's any value in this statement at all @Grumpy CatIn post 139, Alisae wrote:I think Hopkirk shading Flopz isn't something that he would go out of his way to do if they were partners.| here.GTKAS-
-
Alisae lolbalance
- lolbalance
- lolbalance
- Posts: 47098
- Joined: October 31, 2016
- Location: Cali~ (PST)
its bringing attention to his partner.In post 165, Grumpy Cat wrote:How is talking about his meta shade if Flopz hasn't even posted yet? That's not gonna convince anyone to launch him more when the guy has 0 posts| here.GTKAS-
-
Alisae lolbalance
- lolbalance
- lolbalance
- Posts: 47098
- Joined: October 31, 2016
- Location: Cali~ (PST)
ooooh ok thank you for saying so, I probably would have never have known if you didn't say anythingIn post 168, Grumpy Cat wrote:
That's maybe fair, it puts a little more pressure on Flopz for when he makes his entrance. Still, I kinda don't want to break it to you because it's funny, but I probably should for the sake of playing this game of mafia. All of our shade on Flopz is kidding around, and the "toxic" stories are just made upIn post 166, Alisae wrote:
its bringing attention to his partner.In post 165, Grumpy Cat wrote:How is talking about his meta shade if Flopz hasn't even posted yet? That's not gonna convince anyone to launch him more when the guy has 0 posts| here.GTKAS-
-
Alisae lolbalance
-
-
Alisae lolbalance
-
-
Alisae lolbalance
-
-
Alisae lolbalance
-
-
Alisae lolbalance
-
-
Alisae lolbalance
- lolbalance
- lolbalance
- Posts: 47098
- Joined: October 31, 2016
- Location: Cali~ (PST)
why are you RVSing when you have a read you want to pressure?In post 203, Iconeum wrote:it's pretty Obvious where i'm voting now, right?
VOTE: Dong you think you can policy lynch me?
| here.GTKAS-
-
Alisae lolbalance
- lolbalance
- lolbalance
- Posts: 47098
- Joined: October 31, 2016
- Location: Cali~ (PST)
I don’t mind this takeIn post 206, WindowsXP wrote:To be honest, your recent spam of posts are not actually very helpful and just reacting to random things.| here.GTKAS-
-
Alisae lolbalance
- lolbalance
- lolbalance
- Posts: 47098
- Joined: October 31, 2016
- Location: Cali~ (PST)
Ok so why do you not want to give your thoughts on 2 slots?In post 220, Iconeum wrote:so windows
your thoughts are literally:
-ask ico to give thoughts on 2 slots
-ico says no
->ico clearly has scum motivation for this
how?| here.GTKAS-
-
Alisae lolbalance
- lolbalance
- lolbalance
- Posts: 47098
- Joined: October 31, 2016
- Location: Cali~ (PST)
what stands out to you?In post 242, Donempire wrote:Also, icos behaviour is so far in line with his towngame. I dont doubt it| here.GTKAS-
-
Alisae lolbalance
- lolbalance
- lolbalance
- Posts: 47098
- Joined: October 31, 2016
- Location: Cali~ (PST)
he’s probably going to be annoyingIn post 247, Iconeum wrote:alisae what's your thoughts on paladin?| here.GTKAS-
-
Alisae lolbalance
- lolbalance
- lolbalance
- Posts: 47098
- Joined: October 31, 2016
- Location: Cali~ (PST)
Icon from what I’m seeing, I think you are acting completely unreasonable and WindowsXP is the reasonable one here.In post 253, Iconeum wrote:I'm truly not seeing much in that 1v1 you called out. You can think it's scummy, and that someone is trying to pocket someone else. I don't see it. That should be sufficient answer.
I'm absolutely trying to engage with you in good faith, if it appears like i'm not, that's probably because just do'nt know each other yet.| here.GTKAS-
-
Alisae lolbalance
- lolbalance
- lolbalance
- Posts: 47098
- Joined: October 31, 2016
- Location: Cali~ (PST)
And I want to vote youIn post 260, Iconeum wrote:
because i want toIn post 258, Alisae wrote:why are you RVSing when you have a read you want to pressure?
So I’m going to go do that
VOTE: Icon| here.GTKAS-
-
Alisae lolbalance
- lolbalance
- lolbalance
- Posts: 47098
- Joined: October 31, 2016
- Location: Cali~ (PST)
can you quote it? I might have missed itIn post 267, Iconeum wrote:
i *have* given my thoughts on what he askedIn post 261, Alisae wrote:
Ok so why do you not want to give your thoughts on 2 slots?In post 220, Iconeum wrote:so windows
your thoughts are literally:
-ask ico to give thoughts on 2 slots
-ico says no
->ico clearly has scum motivation for this
how?| here.GTKAS-
-
Alisae lolbalance
- lolbalance
- lolbalance
- Posts: 47098
- Joined: October 31, 2016
- Location: Cali~ (PST)
I’m going to rephrase my question, because you didn’t really answer my question.
Ok so when you wrote post 220, why did you not want to give your thoughts on the 2 slots that were mentioned? Because prior to that, you did not do that (hence why windows had to ask) unless I missed something before 220?| here.GTKAS-
-
Alisae lolbalance
-
-
Alisae lolbalance
- lolbalance
- lolbalance
- Posts: 47098
- Joined: October 31, 2016
- Location: Cali~ (PST)
Ok but you didn’t you could have answered it when he asked it but instead he voted you and you were like “WHAT SCUM MOTIVATION????” And you made such a big deal compared to what it actually is.
Like when windows says
Windows: So what do you think of these 2 slots
And you respond with
Icon: I don’t want to tell you what I think about these 2 slots
How do you expect him to not want to call you out for that?| here.GTKAS-
-
Alisae lolbalance
-
-
Alisae lolbalance
-
-
Alisae lolbalance
- lolbalance
- lolbalance
- Posts: 47098
- Joined: October 31, 2016
- Location: Cali~ (PST)
I think when he asked if you were an ego player instead of flat out calling you an ego player isn’t rude and I think his comment about your catchup maybe could be interpreted as rude but like he’s talking about your play its fine and honestly, I agree with it completely. Your catch up doesn’t really add anything to the game. I don’t know how you’re supposed to sugarcoat that or why you would even sugarcoat that in a game of mafia.| here.GTKAS-
-
Alisae lolbalance
- lolbalance
- lolbalance
- Posts: 47098
- Joined: October 31, 2016
- Location: Cali~ (PST)
ok first, I haven’t gotten myself invested in a game of mafia in quite a bit, so I honestly didn’t remember right away aside from the fact that you really do not like being flamedIn post 287, Iconeum wrote:ali
you have first hand experience at attacking me for my play
you know how town!me responds to that
don't act surprised now
Secondly, even if I did remember that right away, I still don’t think you’re acting reasonable here.| here.GTKAS-
-
Alisae lolbalance
-
-
Alisae lolbalance
-
-
Alisae lolbalance
- lolbalance
- lolbalance
- Posts: 47098
- Joined: October 31, 2016
- Location: Cali~ (PST)
Why do you want to focus on me?In post 337, Donempire wrote:Because it was an rvs vote
I think its more productive to focus on the hammerer instead of the bystanders.
Poor ico, now we can never get this game to 300 pages
VOTE: alisae| here.GTKAS-
-
Alisae lolbalance
- lolbalance
- lolbalance
- Posts: 47098
- Joined: October 31, 2016
- Location: Cali~ (PST)
dude it was an accident wtf?In post 348, Donempire wrote:
I not suggesting a zero sum deal. If we lynch alisae today, we lose a loose end tomorrow, as she will always have the doubt of lolhammer hanging over her head. If shes town, thats obviously detrimental. If shes scum, there will be devils advocates and really no way to be sure either.In post 344, Piergeiron the Paladinson wrote:
You don't think it would be beneficial to have associative tells lined up for tomorrow?In post 341, Donempire wrote:Wait, i realised mislynching today isnt even bad and lynching scum doesnt benefit us
Why dont we off the one that would cause problems later then because of this shit lolhammer?| here.GTKAS-
-
Alisae lolbalance
- lolbalance
- lolbalance
- Posts: 47098
- Joined: October 31, 2016
- Location: Cali~ (PST)
In post 342, Flopz wrote:
Yh, that's why I'm asking why you didn't stop the vote (and not why you started the vote, my vote on Ico was also RVS) after you said Ico was town in your eyesIn post 337, Donempire wrote:Because it was an rvs vote
Wouldn't it make sense to put your vote elsewhere?
How does unvoting someone you placed an RVS vote on because you townread them not make any sense? You don’t even HAVE to vote someone else, you just unvote now that you have a read.In post 343, Donempire wrote:Not really, but i understand where you are coming from. Hammer happened while i was asleep. At that time i didnt have any better spots to vote, so i wanted to save it for when i had an idea. I didnt think an ico lynch would happen, or if it did i'd be there to review the reasons instead of a lolhammer. Hindsight is something i didnt have.
Like this feels very strange because by the time you came in and said that you thought icon was town, we were out of RVS, so shouldn’t you be trying to find scum? What were your other reads at the time when you said Icon was town?| here.GTKAS-
-
Alisae lolbalance
- lolbalance
- lolbalance
- Posts: 47098
- Joined: October 31, 2016
- Location: Cali~ (PST)
ok let me rephrase cause I meant to say that I thought I would be the third vote atm. I didn’t know dogempire or flops was still voting icon and I thought it would be L-2In post 360, Grumpy Cat wrote:
What, why didn't you announce L-1 then?In post 357, Alisae wrote:I had no idea I hammered Icon when I voted him I thought he had 3 votes at the time :/
Sorry| here.GTKAS-
-
Alisae lolbalance
-
-
Alisae lolbalance
- lolbalance
- lolbalance
- Posts: 47098
- Joined: October 31, 2016
- Location: Cali~ (PST)
Why would you leave your vote on someone you townread?In post 370, Grumpy Cat wrote:Town leaves RVS votes on people they think they're town all the time. That isn't "very strange" by any stretch. The intent of the vote was RVS, so it's not something that's gonna be conscious at the back of town!Dogem's mind to remove.| here.GTKAS-
-
Alisae lolbalance
-
-
Alisae lolbalance
-
-
Alisae lolbalance
-
-
Alisae lolbalance
- lolbalance
- lolbalance
- Posts: 47098
- Joined: October 31, 2016
- Location: Cali~ (PST)
I think its strange and the explanation he’s given for it is strange.
I also think his primary focus is not scumhunting given at the start of this day, he votes me for basically being a liability and is trying to justify mislynching me with EVs and saying I’m a liability.
Why are you defending leaving an RVS vote on someone you townread? You may see it as common but at the end of the day, it is still bad play.| here.GTKAS-
-
Alisae lolbalance
- lolbalance
- lolbalance
- Posts: 47098
- Joined: October 31, 2016
- Location: Cali~ (PST)
Or you can realize that it was an accident, and any alignment can place that vote at that time and think they would not hammer Icon, and move on.In post 380, Donempire wrote:
Okay? And that means you cant have some motivation behind lolhammering somehow?In post 359, Alisae wrote:
dude it was an accident wtf?In post 348, Donempire wrote:
I not suggesting a zero sum deal. If we lynch alisae today, we lose a loose end tomorrow, as she will always have the doubt of lolhammer hanging over her head. If shes town, thats obviously detrimental. If shes scum, there will be devils advocates and really no way to be sure either.In post 344, Piergeiron the Paladinson wrote:
You don't think it would be beneficial to have associative tells lined up for tomorrow?In post 341, Donempire wrote:Wait, i realised mislynching today isnt even bad and lynching scum doesnt benefit us
Why dont we off the one that would cause problems later then because of this shit lolhammer?
I dont see how we reach upon a conclusion on you. You either carry this lolhammerer mark into d3 or you die today and at least we can associate. I already explained my reasoning in the post you quoted.| here.GTKAS-
-
Alisae lolbalance
- lolbalance
- lolbalance
- Posts: 47098
- Joined: October 31, 2016
- Location: Cali~ (PST)
I didn’t check VCs because there weren’t any VCs at the timeIn post 383, Donempire wrote:I'm literally the first vote alisae, im the most sus person on that wagon? For an rvs vote and a hammer that then happens while im asleep? Defend your hammer, dont try to paint me as scum instead, it only makes you seem worse. So far the only reasoning you gave was "it was an accident", and if so dont you check VCs?| here.GTKAS-
-
Alisae lolbalance
- lolbalance
- lolbalance
- Posts: 47098
- Joined: October 31, 2016
- Location: Cali~ (PST)
You seem the most sus person on that wagon because you enabled that wagon to reach 5 votes when you could have easily made sure that that didn’t happen by unvoting.In post 383, Donempire wrote:I'm literally the first vote alisae, im the most sus person on that wagon? For an rvs vote and a hammer that then happens while im asleep? Defend your hammer, dont try to paint me as scum instead, it only makes you seem worse. So far the only reasoning you gave was "it was an accident", and if so dont you check VCs?
And how am I not supposed to see your slot and think that what you’re doing is strange? Not only did you enable that wagon to reach 5 votes, but you’re also coming into the day phase trying to label me as a liability and saying why its better to mislynch then it is to lynch scum. Like this is really strange because it feels like you’re not trying to find scum. Do you have any other suspects or am I your only suspect?
I voted Icon because I scumread him and he was acting weird in regards to Windows and I liked Windows the most between their discussion with Icon. Thats why I voted Icon and I didn’t realize I hammered until I woke up and saw that I hammered. I’m sorry. I fucked up.| here.GTKAS