Open 701: Pick Yer Power X/Y Game Over!

Creature · Fri Dec 22, 2017 1:47 am

Do you want to push Lalendra?

Creature · Fri Dec 22, 2017 1:51 am

Spoiler:

In post 414, pisskop wrote:
In post 11, mutantdevle wrote:VOTE: creature

That’s for leaving Everybody Edits
Slight negative points, and a full 5minutes after the prior post; he didnt even use the sheep as a sheep he dressed it up.

In post 15, texcat wrote:
In post 13, pisskop wrote:VOTE: texcat

you jerk
???

VOTE: pisskop
You took first. I cant be mad at the others who took 1; I almost took 2 though.

In post 18, Creature wrote:Leaving here that I detected so far one post that looks very forced and one post that looks very genuine.

Free towncred if you can find each.

In post 16, CommKnight wrote:VOTE: Pisskop - One scum in the group of 1's for sure.

Also holy shit, look at that. I managed to pick the one number that wouldn't screw me and someone else over.
This above is forced

As of page one, I think mutant is just overeager beavers.

In post 43, mutantdevle wrote:There are a few roles that we may benefit from being aware exists, not many though. And if she is scum then her telling us her role is all the better.
Why the hell would scum!cat tell us their role truthfully? You know that there are def scumsided roles to pick?
And in this same post you are asking if she wants to?

This and the previous posts sounds really eager beaver.

And the vote on him from santa hat lady seems a bit eager too. Like end RVS early for small fries for show eager.

In post 45, Aster wrote:UNVOTE: mutantdevle
VOTE: mutantdevle4reals
This post pings me. Baby's first scumread right here.

In post 51, MisaTange wrote:Plus, if it wasn't obvious by the mechanics, now it's blatantly obvious that he'll be protected tonight now that someone pointed out that he's a PR.
Unnecessary post is conjecture and unnecessary. And pointless. And not really useful information but said anyway to . . . prove one's presence?

In post 53, wilky wrote:"I AM NOT BACKTRACKING.... I'M JUST UHMMM.... EHHMM... FINISHED WITH THE CONVERSATION!!!!!1"
I refer you to the above, but remove unnecessary and insert obnoxious and rude for no reason. What a terrible way to enter the game. Does it make you feel good to leetspeak to mutant?

In post 63, Chip Butty wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: Mutant
My heart wants this to be scummy, but my objective hindsight wants to believe its applying pressure. Keep track of this one.

In post 87, Creature wrote:Choosing my first wagon.

VOTE: Aster
<3

RVS is done.

In post 415, pisskop wrote:
In post 97, wilky wrote:
In post 95, texcat wrote:{snip}

We can, but you seem a little defensive here.
Sorry but defensive about what exactly? I'm trying to take the game away from off topic conversations and on to more game related content. I'd be more inclined to believe that keeping an off topic conversation going would be a scummy thing to do.
Tryhard is tryhard but reads as town-ish-y

Watch wilky v. dionaea chips is actually scum theater.

In post 115, Assemblerotws wrote:VOTE: Chip
You should know better than this.
Confirmation that chippy is a little off his rocker.

In post 126, Lalendra wrote:Oh and
VOTE: Mutantdevle
ugh

In post 140, CommKnight wrote:
In post 127, Elmo TeH AzN wrote:
In post 122, CommKnight wrote:
@Mod: Did mafia have pre-game chat before draft was sent in?

Throughout the bidding phases, the thread is locked, however, mafia may collude privately during this time and then again throughout the day.
Now, can anyone guess why I wanted this information?
Because you're a dumbass who cant read setup infos?

In post 167, Chip Butty wrote:I'm not really sure pressing mutant for a claim is beneficial in this setup. As scum he could just claim whatever role he actually got from the draft, since scum and town were choosing from the same pool. No need to lie, and therefore no need to get caught lying.
Wrong. pressing for claims is in fact quite helpful. Especially if you scumread them. they claim, and their death or survival helps us no matter what he claims. He claims his role and his requested role. We know he is lying if somebody else counters. and down the line he could get caught in a lie.

In post 222, Viomi wrote:
In post 221, Viomi wrote:
In post 220, Viomi wrote:
In post 218, MisaTange wrote:Was talking to mutant :p. Thought it was obvious since I wasn't asking you to vote yourself
I'm asking why would he be voting me? Why is me having played this setup before a reason for him to vote me?
Oh, you're referring to him thinking pisskop is scummy for having not said much despite playing this setup before. Gotcha.
Clearly the answer is that he's grasping at straws and that a lot of his reads aren't genuine. Hence why they're one-liners and despite pisskop and I acting similarly, he has completely different reads on us.

TL;DR he's scum
4 or 5 times now, Ive played this setup.

In post 223, Aster wrote:Pisskop is active lurking really badly. I'm not sure whether I can even call it "active" lurking anymore.
Pisskop is active lurking really badly. I'm not sure whether I can even call it "active" lurking anymore.
I think this is telling. He calls me suspicious, and not active. He pans it out as if somehow the inactive part makes it worse?

VOTE: aster

why arent we wagoning this thing again? Is it because he is active? the logical failings of this poster are . . .

In post 417, pisskop wrote:
In post 244, Lalendra wrote:I find it funny that Creature keeps referring to mutant being newbtown when a) they've played on another site together and b) mutant has made it very clear that he is not new, that he has played before, and that he does not want to be discounted as a new player.
His play screams Eager Beaver. I wonder if mutantscum would be capable of ranting along for so long as a wriggling scumlord.

In post 277, CityElectric wrote:You're just skimming for your name from time to time, yet you magically appear to post an intent to hammer out of nowhere. That intent to hammer also doesn't align with 264 at all.
In fact 264 and 159 don't even seem to come from the same player. What happened between 264 and 159 that made you change your position so radically?

VOTE: pisskop

What Change in What Position???

This post is tryhard. note it, love it, hold it. Its a bad post.

K Im bored.

Lynch in

- Lalindra
- Aster
- Commknight
- Ed Edd and Eddy avatar girl
-
mayyyybe assembles or wilky

This is content most players seem to be lacking.

Creature · Fri Dec 22, 2017 1:52 am

In post 1185, Viomi wrote:
In post 1184, Creature wrote:Do you want to push Lalendra?
Yes?

You're coming off as extremely manipulative scum attempting to get people off CK onto any other possible wagon, by the way.

Yeah, I'm being an extremely manipulative town attempting to get people off the mislynches like I did with mutant, pisskop and even you.

Creature · Fri Dec 22, 2017 1:52 am

Guess I'm gonna have to find your post about Aster somewhere.

Creature · Fri Dec 22, 2017 1:56 am

I'm honestly hoping you aren't townreading Aster because "your scumreads are voting him/her".

I'll take you're townreading Aster because of his cases. Well, for me, it isn't anything outside scum range, hence why I'm not safe townreading him/her yet.

Creature · Fri Dec 22, 2017 1:57 am

VOTE: Lalendra

Creature · Fri Dec 22, 2017 2:01 am

Hi mutantdevle

Creature · Fri Dec 22, 2017 6:44 am

So we can strike out texcat, Viomi, mutant, CK, north, KidAmn and me from lynch options for today, right?

Creature · Fri Dec 22, 2017 6:45 am

Chip Butty is like an Aster for me, I haven't gathered enough confidence.

Creature · Fri Dec 22, 2017 7:02 am

Hi, I'm there, anyone want to talk with me?

We could talk mainly about our lynch options for today:
Aster
CheekyTeeky
Chip Butty
CityElectric
Lalendra

Creature · Fri Dec 22, 2017 7:04 am

Oh, and it isn't a requirement for scum to choose number 1. In fact, I think they would avoid that number.

Creature · Fri Dec 22, 2017 7:06 am

In post 1011, CityElectric wrote:Aster has quite a lot of posts
with a lot of math
in them which I don't quite understand.

lol

Creature · Fri Dec 22, 2017 7:11 am

Three of the most active players?

Creature · Fri Dec 22, 2017 10:18 am

In post 1225, Viomi wrote:
In post 1213, Creature wrote:So we can strike out texcat, Viomi, mutant, CK, north, KidAmn and me from lynch options for today, right?
Why would we strike out texcat or nsg?

Because they're high in the list (and I townread texcat).

Creature · Fri Dec 22, 2017 10:31 am

In post 1232, Viomi wrote:
In post 1230, Creature wrote:
In post 1225, Viomi wrote:
In post 1213, Creature wrote:So we can strike out texcat, Viomi, mutant, CK, north, KidAmn and me from lynch options for today, right?
Why would we strike out texcat or nsg?
Because they're high in the list (and I townread texcat).
Why in the world do you townread texcat?

Her pushes on me and stuff like this:

In post 680, texcat wrote:Some of the reads below are POE. For example, I have a town read on Aster because I don't think Aster and Viomi can both be scum.

Texcat - 2

Northsidegal - 3

Assemblerotws - 4

CommKnight - 6
Mutantdevle - 8

MisaTange - 30

CityElectric - 5

Chip Butty - 5

Wilky - 7

Creature - 7

Lalendra - 7

Aster - 1

Pisskop - 1

Viomi - 1

even though her reads are pretty wrong.

Creature · Fri Dec 22, 2017 10:32 am

Maybe not that wrong.

Creature · Fri Dec 22, 2017 10:35 am

So now who do we discuss about?

Creature · Fri Dec 22, 2017 10:40 am

Actually it makes perfect sense.

Creature · Fri Dec 22, 2017 10:41 am

In any way, we're not lynching texcat today nor tomorrow atleast.

Creature · Fri Dec 22, 2017 10:43 am

Any other player we can discuss about?

Creature · Fri Dec 22, 2017 10:45 am

Because I need to do more than get townread to win.

Creature · Fri Dec 22, 2017 10:46 am

texcat's posts have been pretty coherent and I don't think scum!texcat is capable of being that coherent.

Creature · Fri Dec 22, 2017 10:50 am

Do you want to take a look at CheekyTeeky now? Or CheekyTeeky is only scummy if CK flips scum?

Creature · Fri Dec 22, 2017 11:01 am

Posting this just so KidAmn doesn't think the question wasn't directed at him.

Creature · Fri Dec 22, 2017 11:53 am

In post 1255, CheekyTeeky wrote:VOTE: Creature

If you guys pull another pisskop on me because town doesn't give a shit then please get Creature next. Thanks.

Also why do scum want me mislynched today or tomorrow? I see no case so gtfo or give me something decent to respond to. Well anyone except Viomi. That slot is making me apathetic af.

Maybe if you start seeing brighter we can work together. Townreading me would be a good start.

Creature · Fri Dec 22, 2017 12:17 pm

Because I'm trusting tex's meta.

Creature · Fri Dec 22, 2017 12:18 pm

texcat is out of the table for today btw.

Creature · Fri Dec 22, 2017 12:19 pm

but townreading me is a sign of sanity.

Creature · Fri Dec 22, 2017 12:20 pm

In post 1266, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 1262, Creature wrote:Because I'm trusting tex's meta.
Why?

Because I townread texcat and I don't see why texcat would give it to the table if it was completely wrong.

Creature · Fri Dec 22, 2017 12:21 pm

In post 1268, mutantdevle wrote:Okay, my reevaluation is that Comm being lynched isn't the end of the world as town but I think I'd still prefer it if he wasn't.

I guess we'll have to work together, because apparently Chip Butty and CheekyTeeky will do everything to get one of the generic "scumreads" (CommKnight, Creature, Viomi) lynched today.

Creature · Fri Dec 22, 2017 12:22 pm

CheekyTeeky has the potential to be VI, Chip Butty on the other hand could very well be taking advantage of the situation.

Creature · Fri Dec 22, 2017 12:24 pm

Sure, I'll flip town, the problem is whether everybody will trust my reads.

Creature · Fri Dec 22, 2017 12:25 pm

Then it's scum?

Creature · Fri Dec 22, 2017 12:32 pm

In post 1218, CheekyTeeky wrote:I'll lynch Creature, Viomi or Comm today.

Do you think a town player would ever argument there was a counterwagon on scum to scum with the third scum whiteknighting both of them?

Creature · Fri Dec 22, 2017 4:07 pm

I guess we never needed this deadline extension if everybody simply won't move.

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 12:37 am

In post 1287, CheekyTeeky wrote:Like how is what I'm doing AI of scum? It's seriously frustrating that I come into an obv. town slot and still mess it up without knowing why... ok so I'm all over the place. How does that make me scum?? Wouldn't scum be more careful and less confident to be all over the place? I might play in ways you guys aren't used to but it's effective for me and doesn't mean I'm scum. Like I don't even understand why there's been a push by Comm on me and nek minnit people are like omg yeah Cheeky is scum without even saying why? How can you guys not see why I'm getting frustrated af. I want to win this game but if town are going to be manipulated so easily by scum then we don't have a chance. No matter what Comm flips it's me tomorrow and someone else will be shot at night so if Comm is town that's 3 town dead before you work out you're looking in the wrong place.

Maybe because you prefer to wagon the most popular opinions?

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 12:38 am

Do you have anyone outside CK, Viomi and me you would accept to wagon?

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 1:55 am

We could go back to Lalendra, the problem is getting support.

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 2:14 am

In post 1300, Viomi wrote:So, they're all town.

Not really, it isn't just about voting you.

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 2:16 am

I agree there must have scum on that fifth harmony though.

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 2:35 am

You need to take into consideration their position (do they have a valid reason to intent/hammer you?), the timing (was it a good time to hammer?), etc. Also, it isn't that easy to get away hammering town.

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 2:39 am

I actually don't think scum!CK can fake his aggressiveness.

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 2:40 am

I'm mostly avoiding CK because I'm expecting him to die (or screw scum if they don't NK him).

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 2:41 am

In post 1302, Creature wrote:I agree there must have scum on that fifth harmony though.

texcat and Assemble are my townreads, so that leaves Cheeky, Chip and Lalendra.

Cheeky feels like a VI, so that leaves Chip and Lalendra, both wagons I love.

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 2:43 am

You can join any of Chip and Lalendra. CK should also join, so does mutant. Eventually town will have to compromise into the wagon (and get scum as a bonus).

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 2:46 am

CommKnight - Will have to join if he wants to save himself
Creature - Definitely in
northsidegal - Scum
Aster - Biased
texcat - VI
Viomi - Definitely in I guess
mutantdevle - Will probably join
Chip Butty - Scum
Lalendra - Scum
CheekyTeeky - VI
CityElectric - Not even playing
KidAmn - VIing

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 2:48 am

I have faith that a wagon composed of the four most competent players will attract more votes.

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 3:01 am

VOTE: Lalendra

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 3:03 am

idk, everything Lalendra has done is generic stuff any scum, including me, could do.

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 3:04 am

Plus, if she was correct about her scumreads, it would mean two scum are trying to revive a dead town.

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 3:05 am

I would do northsidegal if we had way more time. Maybe we can do her tomorrow.

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 3:06 am

In post 1319, mutantdevle wrote:I agree with a lot of her opinions

As far as I remember she only seems to be scumreading Viomi and me.

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 3:18 am

In post 1324, mutantdevle wrote:Also, how do we not have enough time to explore NSG but we do have time to explore Lalendra?

Draft order.

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 3:19 am

northsidegal is way more competent than how she has been this game.

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 9:17 am

In post 1335, texcat wrote:We have almost 2 days left. I'm really getting a bad feeling about this. It seems like compromise lynches are almost always town.

The difference is that we're trying to make a scum lynch a compromise lynch because we lack support, unlike CK wagon which is the definition of compromise.

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 9:18 am

In post 1337, Aster wrote:Creature seems fine with lynching just about anyone.

Tell me you're kidding, please.

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 9:20 am

In post 1337, Aster wrote:Like, so solid that your target looks more scummy than CommKnight?

The problem is that what you consider solid is actually fallacic generic tells.

I don't even see where CommKnight is being antitown.

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 9:21 am

In post 1337, Aster wrote:It looks like Creature knows more about who not to lynch than who to lynch.

Yeah, you're right, I find it easier to find a solid townread than a solid scumread.

Also, you're basically contradicting this affirmation:

Creature seems fine with lynching just about anyone.

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 9:22 am

In post 1337, Aster wrote:yet are not willing to take responsibility for any alternative action.

I was like "do you want to push Lalendra?" "I guess we have enough support to do Lalendra or Chip" and you post this?

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 9:24 am

In post 1337, Aster wrote:but I don't think I've seen any scumhunting done.

My talking about northsidegal, Lalendra, Chip Butty, CheekyTeeky, etc. is what then?

What I was doing with CommKnight when he seemed scummy for me was what if not scumhuntijng?

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 9:26 am

In post 1339, Aster wrote:That said, it does appear to me that he's more looking for whom of those he can get lynched than for whom of those he thinks is the most scummy.

I was more collectively there, trying to find agreement.

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 9:27 am

In post 1339, Aster wrote:This gives me again the impression that Creature is not concerned with whom is scum but with whom he can get lynched.

I actually have a scumteam guess and arguments to think the others are town.

Meanwhile players like you are more bothered with making sure CK is lynched than anything.

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 9:28 am

In post 1339, Aster wrote:As much as lurkers hurt town, we currently cannot afford to policy lynch all of them

Hence why we should actually try to sort the lurkers. It isn't impossible for scum to be among them.

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 9:29 am

In post 1339, Aster wrote:Moreover, Creature is quite acting like Comm's scumbuddy so I'm also quite suspicious of whatever bandwagon he's pushing.

What if CK is town?

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 9:31 am

In post 1339, Aster wrote:However, as can be seen by reading through his ISO, Creature will keep suggesting different players to get lynched if he doesn't get support for whom he suggests. Most of his suggenstions circle around the same set of players

*makes one sentence*
*contradicts that sentence in the next sentence*

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 9:33 am

Team Creature shuts down shitty cases at the speed of light,
Sheep us now, or prepare to get stomped

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 9:40 am

I was planning to start writing a book today, but I lost all inspiration answering to Aster's case. I'm gonna read some other book and give Aster a chance of redemption.

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 9:43 am

In post 1354, northsidegal wrote:have i played with either of you before, or have you just read games that i've been in?

I've seen you playing in other games and I heard you're pretty good as town. You've been disappointing this game so far.

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 9:45 am

In post 1354, northsidegal wrote:all i remember is from the start of the day where you said that i was sheeping people on a wagon that i had started myself. you've just been saying that i'm scum ever since.

I guess I've mentioned plenty of times how you've been just taking safe stances and staying out of the center.

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 9:45 am

Actually I was talking more about Lalendra but it applied to you too.

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 9:46 am

A question you may want to answer:
If you were scum and planning to win, how would you act?

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 9:46 am

Okay, is there any wagon you want to propose that I can agree with?

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 11:09 am

In post 1361, Aster wrote:Can't you just write a single coherent post with your thoughts?

Sorry, it's way easier for me to post separately than cramp everything into one post and lose part of the content I meant to post.

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 11:10 am

In post 1361, Aster wrote:And townreads happen to be what we don't need

We need townreads as much as scumreads.

It's easy for scum to not look scummy, but it's harder for scum to look towny.

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 11:12 am

Okay, I'm just not someone who's pretty confident. rn I don't have a very solid scumread and I'm looking for players I'm okay lynching, aka the ones I don't townread.

In post 1361, Aster wrote:You know? Scum don't know who to lynch, they only know who not to lynch. Start acting like a townie and figure out who should be lynched.

I'm pretty sure scum must have their agenda.

Yeah, scum don't mind who's lynched, but they're more likely to be confident as they don't have to worry about being wrong.

Also, ain't I trying to figure out who should be lynched?

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 11:15 am

In post 1361, Aster wrote:And no, it does not contradict my following affirmation wherein "just about everyone" refers to everyone except a select few that you're opposed to. Your attitude is not "I want to lynch one of [these people]", your attitude is "I do not want lynch one of [these people] and I'm fine with everyone else." And you're giving me the impression that you're very willing to lynch outside of your 5/6-ish "viable lynches" as long as there is support for somebody else and they are not one of your supposedly "hard townreads".

I've tried narrowing it down, but I'm forced to open up a bit so I can agree to do something.

I still am pretty skeptical about leaving nullreads null.

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 11:16 am

In post 1361, Aster wrote:Just look at your last post 1360. You're once again asking somebody to figure out for you who to bandwagon against. You're even asking one of the players who you are suspicious of who you should bandwagon against. It's kind of pathetic how little you care about actually scumhunting.

I'm trying to find where people agree.

I also don't have a reason to refuse to work something with someone just because I scumread them.

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 11:19 am

In post 1361, Aster wrote:Yes, I do. You've been dancing around many targets. When you asked "do you want to push for Lalendra", you're not pushing for Lalendra, you're hoping that somebody else will do the pushing for you. If this this "somebody else" didn't exist, you'd step over to something else like "do you want to push for Chip"? Lalendra seems to be the one that Viomi will support you on, so that why that one has been stickier than the others.

I actually have a reason to do this. I gotta see if I'll have support, otherwise I'd be wasting my time.

Before you go "but oh, you gotta case someone you think is scum", well, the deadline is looming and a productive wagon, even if wrong, is better than no productive wagon.

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 11:22 am

In post 1361, Aster wrote:I've been searching through your ISO, but I can't find any point at which you actually present a case against Lalendra outside of post 873, which can hardly be called a "case".

Again, my cases aren't like yours. I don't use objective tells like "buddying", "voted without a reason". My cases come more from real-time interactions and subjectively.

Like: both CityElectric and Lalendra are lurkers, however, I feel CityElectric lurks regardless of alignment, while Lalendra I classify more as sitting in the sidelines watching town eat itself.

Sometimes I get gut feels but I'm avoiding mentioning them.

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 11:26 am

In post 1361, Aster wrote:"Different players" refers to "different players among the set of players you circle around". The set of players you circle around isn't exactly small. After adding Northside to the set in post 1215, you're circling around half the living players.

Still, I've done the work to narrow the number of options down and still trying to narrow it even more down.

The players I've been circling around rn are Chip, Lalendra and northside. And guess what? There are three scum.

I just still gotta figure if you're just a really close-minded player and not leave CityElectric untouched all the game.

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 11:28 am

If you like games so much, here's one for you:

Pick one of my completed town games (you can go to my profile and click show all topics), go to my ISO and look for a case with more than three sentences I've made.

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 11:29 am

In post 1373, Aster wrote:I hope you realise that one quarter of the players is scum, and scum will only ever agree/compromise to lynch townies?

What if we force town to compromise lynch scum?

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 11:35 am

If you want your case to have any credibility:

In post 1374, Creature wrote:If you like games so much, here's one for you:

Pick one of my completed town games (you can go to my profile and click show all topics), go to my ISO and look for a case with more than three sentences I've made.

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 3:19 pm

Guess I now understand why nsg is so uninvested this game. Still she makes the most sense as scum from the top 5 of the draft order.

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 3:21 pm

I guess this is what I expect from texcat regardless of alignment. Atleast texcat has been genuine.

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 3:27 pm

I don't think texcat is competent enough to plan her posts as scum.

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 3:29 pm

It's my job to defend who I townread.

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 3:30 pm

In post 1404, texcat wrote:Let's talk about Chip. If we can't lynch Viomi, then it's between Chip and CommK for me. I'm not really interested in Lalendra.

Hey, we agree on Chip atleast.

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 3:31 pm

Also, how the fuck Lalendra is prodded three times and not replaced? So far the games I modded were 3 prods = force-replace.

Creature · Sat Dec 23, 2017 3:34 pm

Again, I think her posts are genuine and we're not lynching her today anyway.

Creature · Mon Dec 25, 2017 1:57 am

In post 1436, CityElectric wrote:Apparently it's not quite socially acceptable yet to play Mafia during Christmas dinner.

Happy holidays everyone!

@Mod: V/LA until the 28th

You're going to be there if we need you, right?

Otherwise you should replace out.

Creature · Mon Dec 25, 2017 1:57 am

In post 1432, Viomi wrote:Damn, 24 hours and the only people to most are myself and the mod. Guess this holiday really makes everyone into a lurker..

My christmas day has ended, I guess.

Creature · Mon Dec 25, 2017 1:59 am

What headache am I supposed to have?

Creature · Mon Dec 25, 2017 3:23 am

Yeah, if you had to go four days without posting it's either replace out to not hurt your town team or take advantage of that for your scum team.

Creature · Mon Dec 25, 2017 11:38 am

In post 1447, momo wrote:the scum team is
MutantDelve, Creature
, and Chip Butty

Creature · Mon Dec 25, 2017 12:44 pm

And you got pretty confident on mutant and me being scum? lol

Creature · Mon Dec 25, 2017 12:50 pm

Sorry, I don't take people who incorrectly scumread me seriously.

Creature · Mon Dec 25, 2017 12:51 pm

In post 1448, momo wrote:-Post #24 could be alerting scumbudies to not fall for trap.

You do realise I made that "trap", right?

Creature · Mon Dec 25, 2017 12:52 pm

In post 127, Elmo TeH AzN wrote:
In post 122, CommKnight wrote:
@Mod: Did mafia have pre-game chat before draft was sent in?

Throughout the bidding phases, the thread is locked, however, mafia may collude privately during this time and then again throughout the day.

Oh, I noticed this. Scum may have hit the same number.

Creature · Mon Dec 25, 2017 12:55 pm

I guess you made me not want to lynch mutant today even more.

Creature · Tue Dec 26, 2017 7:02 am

I am unsatisfied with both Lil Uzi Vert and momo. I thought they would whip this game pretty hard like I tried to.

Creature · Tue Dec 26, 2017 7:07 am

Though, LUV's reads don't look that opportunistic.

Creature · Tue Dec 26, 2017 8:39 am

In post 1480, momo wrote:Will get back to reading now

Better you do.

Creature · Tue Dec 26, 2017 11:07 am

VOTE: Chip Butty

Creature · Tue Dec 26, 2017 11:08 am

In post 1162, CityElectric wrote:The post-finals brain fry is real.

Anyways, yeah I'm still down with lynching Comm (because I really don't think he's gonna flip a town PR). I've seen left and right also some voices going up for lynching Creature, which I'm also very down with.

Actually, you know what

In post 1163, CityElectric wrote:(whoops phone posting is hard)

UNVOTE:

VOTE: Creature

Still not sure if I should still consider this just a lurker.

Creature · Wed Dec 27, 2017 11:01 am

VOTE: Lil Uzi Vert

Creature · Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:47 pm

Like the way texcat started to be considered as a lynch option, is it scum despair?

Creature · Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:47 pm

In post 1550, Chip Butty wrote:Don't forget the early role fishing.

Sure, mutant was rolefishing his scumbuddy...

Creature · Wed Dec 27, 2017 1:05 pm

I gotta decide on whether Chip is VI or just scum, but I'm leaning back to "just scum".

Creature · Wed Dec 27, 2017 3:05 pm

"geninue"

Creature · Thu Dec 28, 2017 4:38 am

In post 1589, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Creature, talk to me about Electric? You mentioned generic?

Yeah, he's the definition of genericity.

His reads are plagiarism, specially his "oh creature is buddying too much i'm down to lynch him"

Creature · Fri Dec 29, 2017 3:45 am

KidAmn and CityElectric

You're both voting a lynch that will not go through D: Please, switch to one of the three bigger wagons.

Creature · Fri Dec 29, 2017 7:18 am

Oh right, LUV is missing from the VC.

Creature · Fri Dec 29, 2017 7:18 am

I'm again questioning the Aster townreads.

Creature · Fri Dec 29, 2017 2:48 pm

My vote is about to lock.

Creature · Fri Dec 29, 2017 2:55 pm

Viomi, do you want me to switch to Chip? Soon I won't be able to change my vote anymore.

Creature · Fri Dec 29, 2017 3:07 pm

I hope that VC is fixed soon, it's missing names and it's harming town when deadline is looming.

Creature · Fri Dec 29, 2017 3:07 pm

VOTE: Chip

Creature · Fri Dec 29, 2017 3:07 pm

Though, I am still skeptical about LUV not voting anyone.

Creature · Fri Dec 29, 2017 3:07 pm

I'll see if I can wake up tomorrow before deadline.

Creature · Sat Jan 06, 2018 3:19 am

Pretty sure scum must've got atleast one vig, but if they got two we might be in a MyLo.

Creature · Sat Jan 06, 2018 3:20 am

Still, feel like this is caught scum.

VOTE: nsg

Creature · Sat Jan 06, 2018 3:20 am

I can do any of northsidegal and Aster I guess.

Creature · Sat Jan 06, 2018 3:21 am

Sheepsaysmeep is town
Creature is town
northsidegal is scum
Aster is scum
texcat is town
Viomi is town
Lil Uzi Vert idk
Momo is town I guess
CityElectric idk
KidAmn is town

Creature · Sat Jan 06, 2018 3:22 am

Aster + northsidegal + one of {Lil Uzi Vert, CityElectric}

Leaning LUV

Creature · Sat Jan 06, 2018 3:22 am

Liked the way scum killed my paranoia.

Creature · Sat Jan 06, 2018 3:23 am

Scum likely got rolecop and in order for scum to not have used 1-shot vigilante yt, scum must've got night 3 vigilante.

Creature · Sat Jan 06, 2018 4:55 am

Who are you not townreading?

Creature · Sat Jan 06, 2018 5:10 am

^ Taking that as a scumclaim.

Creature · Sat Jan 06, 2018 5:22 am

The

In post 1720, Aster wrote:Sheepsaysmeep+Viomi scumteam

isn't bad enough?

Creature · Sat Jan 06, 2018 5:23 am

In post 1720, Aster wrote:or he decided that it would be a good move for him to strategically switch out and let somebody else replace him.

That's a bannable offense.

Creature · Sat Jan 06, 2018 5:26 am

Actually, where did sheep hint he saw your conversation with Viomi?

Creature · Sat Jan 06, 2018 5:57 am

sheep, how did you notice Aster had just scumreads?

Creature · Sat Jan 06, 2018 8:21 am

LUV, I'm pretty sure northsidegal is scum. While sheepsaysmeep's ketchup seemed pretty town.

Creature · Sat Jan 06, 2018 8:25 am

In post 1770, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:scum would go about the game having little to no town reads.

It's scum. As long they look town they don't need to have a decent number of townreads.

Creature · Sat Jan 06, 2018 8:28 am

In post 1774, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:How do you explain sheep and Viomi push on Aster then, Creature?

???

Viomi's push on Aster seemed pretty justified.

sheep is sheep.

Creature · Sat Jan 06, 2018 8:37 am

In post 1779, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
In post 1705, Viomi wrote:
Claim: Town Neighborizer
since scum already knows this, after all I targeted Aster N1 and I've been chatting with them in our own thread ever since.

They've been super distant and the only
real
response I could get out of them was trying to tell me town probably wouldn't lynch texcat and other excuses why I shouldn't go after texcat sooooo
How does this justify the vote? tex doesn’t have a guilty on her. tex didn’t flip.

I mean the super distant part.

Creature · Sat Jan 06, 2018 8:38 am

In post 1780, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:sheep is sheep does not explain the basis of the Aster push being bull.

sheep is sheep aka what I expect from sheep.

Creature · Sat Jan 06, 2018 8:39 am

In post 1756, sheepsaysmeep wrote:creature's laying way too low

Check activity overview, see who has posted the most and repeat that, please.

Creature · Sat Jan 06, 2018 8:41 am

In post 1772, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Or that thing with PK.

Fun fact: Some players still think it's pisskop's fault he got mislynched.

Creature · Sat Jan 06, 2018 8:41 am

In post 1741, sheepsaysmeep wrote:why havent we lynched tex or aster yet

Because northsidegal is still alive.

Creature · Sat Jan 06, 2018 8:42 am

In post 1740, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Smells like a policy lynch.

Yeah, there's a policy to lynch scum.

Creature · Sat Jan 06, 2018 8:45 am

In post 1727, Aster wrote:he's the first one to pretend that putting out only scumreads is scummy

I think only having scumreads and no townreads is scummy.

Creature · Sat Jan 06, 2018 9:16 am

In post 1793, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:The only thing I haven’t liked from Aster is how flexible he’s been or seems to be.

I thought he was inflexible.

Creature · Sat Jan 06, 2018 3:45 pm

In post 1804, Viomi wrote:which means NSG is town because texcat is obvscum.

What if texcat is town?

Creature · Sat Jan 06, 2018 3:58 pm

In post 1811, Viomi wrote:convince me to hit NSG

May I do that?

Creature · Sat Jan 06, 2018 4:01 pm

So can we now do northsidegal?

Creature · Sun Jan 07, 2018 12:11 am

Get the fuck back to northsidegal.

Creature · Sun Jan 07, 2018 12:21 am

In post 1856, sheepsaysmeep wrote:nsg is fine tbh
that wagon is bad

nsg wagon was composed of me, KidAmn, texcat and Viomi, all of my townreads.

Why didn't scum jump on it if nsg was town?

Creature · Sun Jan 07, 2018 12:22 am

Oh, and I'm pretty sure texcat is town this game.

First, texcat plays somewhat low like this regardless of alignment.

Second, I don't think texcat's reads make sense for scum.

Creature · Sun Jan 07, 2018 12:23 am

I'm up to do any of Aster, Lil Uzi Vert and northsidegal rn. However, I very much prefer northsidegal over everyone else because scum may potentially have both 1-shot vig and night 3 vig with them, which puts us in a MyLo.

Creature · Sun Jan 07, 2018 5:27 am

10 players alive, 7 town, 3 scum.
Mislynch
9 players alive, 6 town, 3 scum.
Scum nightkill + 1-shot vigilante + night 3 vigilante = 3 town deaths
6 players alive, 3 town, 3 scum.
Scum wins

Creature · Sun Jan 07, 2018 5:28 am

I guess something made me townread sheep even further.

Creature · Sun Jan 07, 2018 5:32 am

Would scum!you ever bus scum!nsg?

Creature · Sun Jan 07, 2018 5:47 am

Yeah, I noticed that you probably wouldn't bus.

Creature · Sun Jan 07, 2018 5:48 am

Maybe if I get momo to vote northsidegal Viomi will also join and put northsidegal at L-1.

Creature · Sun Jan 07, 2018 10:32 am

You people are too associative readers.

Creature · Sun Jan 07, 2018 2:42 pm

In post 1881, texcat wrote:
In post 1880, Viomi wrote:Though, only one could be vig because either I or KidAmn were jailkept, which means we had a role backup. Which also means can we lynch LUV or tex already because one of them is n3 vig kthx
Wait, I thought you already claimed to have been jailed lady night. Are you changing your story?

I guess she means jailkeeper must've prevented her from neighborizing KidAmn either by roleblocking her or rolestopping KidAmn. However, jailkeeper can't rolestop.

Creature · Sun Jan 07, 2018 2:43 pm

In post 1883, momo wrote:
In post 1872, Creature wrote:Maybe if I get momo to vote northsidegal Viomi will also join and put northsidegal at L-1.
I do SR nsg, and considering what just happened in surreptitious , i will go with you Creature

VOTE: northsidegal

Yes, sheep me because of Surreptitious.

Creature · Sun Jan 07, 2018 2:43 pm

In post 1885, Viomi wrote:Also gotta love momo literally just sheeping the biggest wagon constantly. I'm blacklisting the fuck out of you if you end up being town, because what the fuck.

This wagon is good, so it's fine for me.

Creature · Sun Jan 07, 2018 2:44 pm

In post 1887, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I still scum read North. I just don’t agree with the overall basis of the wagon so I rather lynch elsewhere.

I townread texcat and KidAmn and I'm leaning town on momo because Cheeky seemed town.

Creature · Sun Jan 07, 2018 2:55 pm

Maybe you are the wrong one?

Creature · Sun Jan 07, 2018 2:58 pm

I'm pretty confident about texcat being town and I have game experience with her to back it up.

Creature · Sun Jan 07, 2018 3:06 pm

Cheeky I'm not so sure, but texcat I'm sure.

Creature · Sun Jan 07, 2018 4:13 pm

In post 1911, Viomi wrote:Yeah for real, why is town helping scum so much this game

Yeah, why are you helping scum rn?

Creature · Sun Jan 07, 2018 9:55 pm

In post 1913, sheepsaysmeep wrote:it's just diff reads
tho nsg is more town than tex or cheeky

Atleast texcat and Cheeky were genuine.

LUV deciding to not vote nsg isn't genuine at all, it's blatant scum not wanting to bus.

Creature · Sun Jan 07, 2018 9:56 pm

In post 1914, Viomi wrote:
In post 1912, Creature wrote:
In post 1911, Viomi wrote:Yeah for real, why is town helping scum so much this game
Yeah, why are you helping scum rn?
I'm at least
attempting
to scumhunt

If you were attempting to scumhunt you would never townread someone because someone else you scumread is voting him/her.

Creature · Sun Jan 07, 2018 10:03 pm

Mod

Can you replace out CityElectric? It's clearly he doesn't want to play, it's gonna be his fourth prod already.

Creature · Mon Jan 08, 2018 3:33 pm

In post 1926, northsidegal wrote:has anyone thought about / asked why mutant was killed?

I've read his ISO but I could conclude nothing.

Creature · Tue Jan 09, 2018 1:40 am

Now we gotta wait a replacement and it'll take long days to find one.

Creature · Tue Jan 09, 2018 1:41 am

In post 1938, Viomi wrote:
In post 1937, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Yeah, it deserves more praise. North case is shit, tex case is shit.
You only think the tex case is bad because you're his scumbuddy and the reasons he's scummy are the same reason your predecessor was scummy.

I was accusing LUV of being northsidegal's scumbuddy, because otherwise he would've voted her already.

Creature · Tue Jan 09, 2018 1:55 am

Creature · Tue Jan 09, 2018 1:55 am

Let's L-1 northsidegal, havingfitz?

Creature · Tue Jan 09, 2018 1:56 am

Also,

mod

northsidegal has 4 votes, not 3.

Creature · Tue Jan 09, 2018 2:48 am

She seemed to act like caught scum after she scumhammered Chip Butty.

Creature · Tue Jan 09, 2018 2:49 am

But whatever, feel free to catch up first.

Creature · Tue Jan 09, 2018 5:01 am

In post 1949, Aster wrote:all it takes for Northside to get lynched is having the scumteam Sheepy & Viomi move their votes to her

Then why they constantly refuse to even consider moving their votes to her?

Creature · Tue Jan 09, 2018 5:31 am

My nightmare is seeing texcat getting lynched in place of northsidegal.

Creature · Tue Jan 09, 2018 5:32 am

There's nothing to refute in Aster's statement anyway.

Creature · Tue Jan 09, 2018 5:33 am

It's already auto-refuted with "sheep and Viomi scumteam"

Creature · Tue Jan 09, 2018 5:57 am

Also, if sheep and Viomi are both scum, doesn't that mean texcat must be town?

Creature · Tue Jan 09, 2018 5:58 am

In post 1955, KidAmn wrote:UNVOTE: nsgThought I'd unvoted. Untwist your panties.

Hopefully you're not giving up on lynching northsidegal.

Creature · Tue Jan 09, 2018 8:04 am

Oh right

Creature · Tue Jan 09, 2018 8:05 am

If only we stopped sillying around, northsidegal would already have flipped scum and we would be lynching LUV.

Creature · Tue Jan 09, 2018 8:06 am

In post 1973, sheepsaysmeep wrote:anything else game progressing to say

texcat is town
northsidegal is scum

Town should vote scum

Who do you need to vote?

Creature · Tue Jan 09, 2018 8:07 am

I doubt you even townread northsidegal rather than just mentally clear her because of texcat.

Creature · Tue Jan 09, 2018 11:17 am

In post 1991, Viomi wrote:Hey town, remember what happened when you listened to Creature and texcat's alternative lynch option D2 and they flipped town? Yeah let's not do that again

I was way less confident about Chip Butty than I was about northsidegal.

Creature · Tue Jan 09, 2018 12:31 pm

It's actually funny lol

Creature · Tue Jan 09, 2018 3:22 pm

What's the townblock? Hopefully there's no impurity inside it.

Creature · Tue Jan 09, 2018 3:52 pm

And I am still not basing any of my reads on the reads of who I scumread.

Creature · Wed Jan 10, 2018 2:38 am

In post 2014, Viomi wrote:
In post 2013, Creature wrote:And I am still not basing any of my reads on the reads of who I scumread.
Then help me lynch texcat so I can base my reads off the reads of flipped scum

Sorry, lynching town isn't my win con.

Creature · Wed Jan 10, 2018 5:56 am

In post 2026, Viomi wrote:
In post 2025, Creature wrote:
In post 2014, Viomi wrote:
In post 2013, Creature wrote:And I am still not basing any of my reads on the reads of who I scumread.
Then help me lynch texcat so I can base my reads off the reads of flipped scum
Sorry, lynching town isn't my win con.
Are you ever going to tell me why you think he's town?

I guess I oversaid that, but you never buyed.

Creature · Wed Jan 10, 2018 5:56 am

I don't remember you saying why do you townread northsidegal though.

Creature · Wed Jan 10, 2018 5:56 am

She's acting like caught scum for me.

Creature · Wed Jan 10, 2018 5:57 am

In post 2018, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:That’s shit North.

Vote her then?

Creature · Wed Jan 10, 2018 5:58 am

or is that just poor distancing?

Creature · Wed Jan 10, 2018 6:06 am

In post 2034, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:No I’m not going to vote North when sheep+Viomi are caught scum.

What if I tell you sheep and Viomi aren't caught scum?

Creature · Wed Jan 10, 2018 6:07 am

Also, you do realise both of them are refusing to vote North, right?

Creature · Wed Jan 10, 2018 6:14 am

I'd still rather ignore associations until we get an actually red flip.

Creature · Wed Jan 10, 2018 6:15 am

Here's a case on northsidegal better than any Aster's case on anyone:

northsidegal is acting weak. northsidegal is like a child hiding behind their parentes. northsidegal doesn't act like this as town.