Mini 2039: uPicketyPicketyPick Mafia Endgame
-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
Is that your quest?In post 19, MariaR wrote:Hello I need to be added to any type of PT thank you.I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
Huh. My quest is a simple condition that needs to be met but I have no idea what it rewards other than my flavour submission.In post 27, MariaR wrote:
Well my quest has 2 parts getting into the pt is one. I'm already somewhat not killable at night but I know if I finish it it gets betterIn post 26, mutantdevle wrote:
Is that your quest?In post 19, MariaR wrote:Hello I need to be added to any type of PT thank you.
I was thinking about whether it was worth all of us sharing what quest conditions that we have. That way, we can help each other to unlock our 2nd abilities. That said, we don't know whether each person we help could be mafia. So then, would it turn into only helping the people we trust? If so, then that might lead to some town discourse as different people want to help different people and others try to prevent some from reaching their conditions. Then there's the possibility that the mafia may be able to prevent us from completing our missions, especially if they cannot be completed within the day.
The alternative is to just let people complete their missions on their own. My problem with that is, I don't know about any of y'all but, the process of my quest isn't helpful to the town. (Whereas if I told you what it was, it could easily be achieved without any consequences). Naturally, if we follow this route, people are going to ask for help anyway if they feel that that's the best way to unlock their ability. That then treads into the territory of "so do we actually help this person because we might just be giving more power to the mafia".
I think the default soloution is the 2nd option as I'm fairly certain that was the way the mod intended. There's also the added benefit of being able to use the extent that people go to try and achieve their quest as AI.I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
It's not a full-on anti-town quest lol. It's not a quest I can achieve by myself so I'd need to work with everyone to achieve it. But I can see a way in which it could make things go badly. Don't worry though, I'm not stupid enough to fall into the trap that it kinda sets out. I imagine that we are either going to achieve my quest condition naturally or we are going to come close to it and I'm going to be like "hey, can we quickly do this:" to achieve it. It would make more sense if I claim it.In post 35, Nibbui wrote:
I mean, if this is what I think it is, it kinda sounds like a scum quest to be honest.In post 31, mutantdevle wrote: The alternative is to just let people complete their missions on their own. My problem with that is, I don't know about any of y'all but,.the process of my quest isn't helpful to the town. (Whereas if I told you what it was, it could easily be achieved without any consequences)
I don't see why you would say that so easily though, I would expect you to be aware that it was a not-so-good-looking quest so...
maybe it's kinda a nice intention after all?
dunno :/
You have raised a valid thought though, do you think that the mafia are going to have specifically anti-town quests? Because if so, then that's a solid reason for everyone to claim their quests.I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
Yeah, that's a better way of explaining it. My quest isn't necessarily disruptive though, just that itIn post 37, Gamma Emerald wrote:I guess the best way to describe my quest is “disruptive”.couldbe.I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
In what way? Sceptical of the claim or sceptical of it meaning she is town? Either way, the answer is because this was just a passing thought I had and wanted to see what other's might have thought of it.In post 72, Kokichi Oma wrote:
VOTE: mutantIn post 32, mutantdevle wrote:Wait, can we infer that MariaR is town from her quest? Since mafia would already be in a PT.
Why arent you more skeptical?I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
To be fair, this kind of bs logic is exactly what I'd expect from NK15.In post 74, Elbirn wrote:
>"Nearly impossible to verify without wasting a nightkill"In post 69, Not Known 15 wrote:
Any... guess you already belong to the Mafia PT?In post 19, MariaR wrote:Hello I need to be added to any type of PT thank you.
Nearly impossible to verify without wasting a nightkill - and by far not guranteed to be town-ish...In post 24, MariaR wrote:I become death proof.
talking about things and avoiding reading/rvs...
This is not the town version of MariaR!
VOTE: MariaR
>"Wasting a nightkill"
>NK15 is thinking from the perspective of a night kill not working as being a bad thing
Gg ez
VOTE: NK15I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
Why have you decided to claim this?In post 78, NicoRobin wrote:Oh, and I am a Miller.I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
To clarify, are you claiming that yourIn post 91, Kokichi Oma wrote:If I win the mini game, I can unlock a person's 2nd role PM for them. So I can unlock whoever we all think is towniest. Sound good?roleenables you to unlock people's 2nd role PM, aka their quest PM? Because the quest flavour is what is listen as 2nd for me. Or are you just being dumb and actually mean this:
(Apologies if you've already answered this on a later page that I haven't read yet).In post 94, Gamma Emerald wrote:
That only works if you win twiceIn post 91, Kokichi Oma wrote:If I win the mini game, I can unlock a person's 2nd role PM for them. So I can unlock whoever we all think is towniest. Sound good?
The first time you win you unlock your own role
Unless you somehow just got no roles at all, which is kinda sketchy.I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
Oof varsoon. Are you going to be posting like that all game? Gotta be honest here I but I found your post just a little irritating. My biggest gripe is how you criticise a lot of people for doing NAI stuff and fluff posts yet a large part of your post has a lot of fluffy stuff in it. Like, if your post is THAT large, and you expect people to actually read it, surely you'd keep your own fluff to a minimum? I mean, I read all of it (except the parts where you had like a paragraph of fluff or something) and I'llprobablycontinue to read all of it. But the easier you make it on us the better. Also, I can't possibly fathom how you actually care about all the questions you asked to everyone, do you really expect a response to all of them? Are you going to chase people for responses or what? I was kinda thinking if you were just doing all that to look busy and gamesolvey but I'm more sure that it's just you taking the game beyond seriously and (unrealistically) expecting everyone else to do the same.
The reason no one was really talking about FB/NK15's interactions page 1 is because, y'know, it's RVS. Am a wrong in thinking that posts and especially votes on page 1 and 2 tend to be more jokey and taken less seriously? Maybe I am because I recall being criticised for my RVS votes in previous games but idk the way you really ripped into all the posts felt like you weren't even acknowledging that the game had just started. Meh.I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
I guess. But I can't help but feel there are slight undertones of someone who doesn't want to be investigated here. Do millers usually claim early in the game? I don't have much experience with them.In post 112, NicoRobin wrote:
Because claiming it right in the beginning is the right thing to do?In post 109, mutantdevle wrote:
Why have you decided to claim this?In post 78, NicoRobin wrote:Oh, and I am a Miller.I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
In post 123, Elbirn wrote:Is his flavor "man who has to respond to every post" cuz I love varsoon but I dont love that wall :cIn post 104, Varsoon wrote:DittoI mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
I don't think I've ever played a game with scum!NK15, but he comes to such obscure conclusions about anything and does nonsensical things so often that I can only assume it's NAI for him. If it's not, then I guess it's a town tell. But I'd have to read through some of NK15's scum games for that and I really can't be bothered to do that this early in the game.In post 147, Varsoon wrote:@MutantDevle: So NK15 usually makes really tenuous connections in coming to conclusions?
Is it just for scumreads or for townreads too?
Is it while playing any alignment?I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
I don't know if RC already has since I'm still catching up but I could also provide links if youIn post 147, Varsoon wrote:In post 111, RadiantCowbells wrote:
It's fairly typical NK15
Thanks for confirming this. Can you support this with links?reallyneed them. But if you can accept the statement that NK15 does stupid shit sometimes without the need of proof then don't ask me because I don't want to waste my timeI mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
Yeah, I agree. But you just seemed to be giving it more meaning than it was worth. Typically, I'd say the time to really analyse RVS content is later in the game once we've had some flips and perspective.In post 147, Varsoon wrote:That said, I'd argue EVERYTHING can be Alignment Indicative and that RVS posts do hold weight.
Just not as much as later posts might.
People who prescribe to an 'RVS is meaningless' philosophy strip it of any use and allow scum to hide in that.
I ain't bout it.I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
Wait, you genuinely believed the stuff you were saying on page 1? I just thought you were joking around.In post 158, Not Known 15 wrote:
I don't think Firebringer paniced at all, I just think that Firebringer had 2 early posts that are not good; the first one, although it was only slightly bad, and post 12. I think that MariaR might have paniced.In post 156, Varsoon wrote:@Nibbui: Firebringer, in my experience, does not panic.
@Firebringer, were you being serious too? I don't know if I'm just being over lenient on RVS content or what but I personally think that overeagerness is a little bit scummy.I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
To put it bluntly, yes. His logic is often very nonsensical and, as a player who likes to solve mechanically, he often annoys me. To be fair, I think part of that is that in most games I've played with him I've found that I've had access to more information than him so it's very easy for me to criticise his logic when I'd already know the rough answers.In post 196, Varsoon wrote:@MutantDevle: So NK15 usually makes really tenuous connections in coming to conclusions?I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
In post 223, Gamma Emerald wrote:
Try children of Hurin if you want to check one out maybe?In post 220, mutantdevle wrote:
I don't think I've ever played a game with scum!NK15, but he comes to such obscure conclusions about anything and does nonsensical things so often that I can only assume it's NAI for him. If it's not, then I guess it's a town tell. But I'd have to read through some of NK15's scum games for that and I really can't be bothered to do that this early in the game.In post 147, Varsoon wrote:@MutantDevle: So NK15 usually makes really tenuous connections in coming to conclusions?
Is it just for scumreads or for townreads too?
Is it while playing any alignment?Stop reading through your own iso you pretentious prick and look at this game.HEY CURRENT MUTANT!
- past mutant.I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
In post 224, RadiantCowbells wrote:Varsoon is by far my top scumread for the record.
Not gonna lie, when I read Varsoon's (proper) entrance my immediate thought was "damn, I'd like to see this guy argue with RC". So if you 2 could do that at some point during this game then that'd be very informative for meIn post 226, Varsoon wrote:Hah!
I'm the only one who calls you out on your shit, of course I'm your number 1 scumread.
Now continue to ignore my questions that I've directly asked you, RC.I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
In every game, I'll look through my iso for various reasons. My alignment just dictates what those reasons areIn post 233, Gamma Emerald wrote:For some reason I get the feeling this post could be AI
Also, do you not look through your own iso sometimes? I can't be the only one that does that.I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
Uhh, I'm kinda against this tbh. I was going to take a break from mafia due to stuff going on in my life but decided to sign up to this game because I really liked the idea of 3 picks and having to complete challenges to get your other 2. So I'm definitely going to be participating in each and every minigame and trying to win as many as possible because that's what I signed up for (not to mention that I REALLY like the flavour of what I've chosen). On top of that, there are mechanical reasons not to do this too. You could very well be scum with this role. You could easily get away with unlocking the ability for a scum buddy as, even if either of you flipped, it would be pure WIFOM of whether or not you used it on scum or town. Besides, every single one of us can achieve the same thing as you just by winning 2 minigames. The difference there would be that we know our own alignments. I think the only way I'd really be okay with just handing you a free minigame win is if you were mechanically confirmed town. But even then, I'd still have problems with it because I do just want to play these minisIn post 246, Kokichi Oma wrote:So are we all in agreement I should win so I can unlock someone who we TR role?I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
Agreed. In particular, there's nobody that I currently town read enough to warrant wanting them to win instead of myself.In post 248, Elbirn wrote:The trouble with this is I dont think theres anyone who's very much townread at this stage in the gameI mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
If kokichi flips scum, then what? Do we just lynch who they empowered just because that's what happened? And if the person Kokichi empowers flips scum, do we just lynch Kokichi because they got unlucky with who they chose? Any decent mafia could easily prevent either of those lynches so I think it would be super easy for a scum!kokichi to empower a scumbuddy.In post 248, Elbirn wrote:The problem then is that if hes scum he'll empower a scumbuddy I guess..but that seems a bit unlikely because it's too obvious? Doing that would give us a 2fer1 if kokichi flips scum.I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
If we do decide that we should just be letting Kokichi win here then the less we say about our opinions on it the better. That way, a scum!kokichi has less information to go one when deciding if he should empower scum or town (the decision being based on whether he thinks we are all likely to want to lynch 1 on a scum flip of the other). But for now, I'm set on the idea of actively trying in this minigame. I'm not caught up yet so my opinion could change if I see a really strong mechanical case for it, but I doubt that'll happen.I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
Yeah, but there'd be 2 chances of town being empowered. The only thing that I think would make this opinion valid considering your other contrasting opinion is if you believe with a solid level of confidence that Kokichi is indeed scum. Is that so?In post 250, Varsoon wrote:I felt as though getting town to be powered up would be good but there's no gaurantee that Kokichi is town AND/OR that Kokichi doesn't just empower scum.
I don't like it.I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
Deciding who he empowers is pointless in my opinion. The obvious answer to each of us is ourselves. In my opinion, if you're seriously considering nominating someone else to get the empowerment then you either A) Have too much faith in a town read or B) Have no faith in yourself to make use of your flavour. Other than that, our choices will either be wildly different to the point that Kokichi will just end up choosing by themself or there will be a plurality vote that decides it which negates the whole point of us all agreeing on who we want to be empowered.In post 381, Nibbui wrote:No, Mutant.
We would be deciding who he empowers and in the next day we would confirm. It would be our choice, not kokichi, and therefore it would be unrelated to Kokichi's flip.
That's not the problem please. I already appointed the real difficulties I think.
I get that you want to play the minigames, but that argument sounds a bit intelectually dishonest of you.
I look forward to reading your own difficulties with this idea. But I do think it needs to be said that those of us who don't want to just hand Kokichi the win here have that opinion for more reasons than just mechanical scepticism. We are also being selfish. I'm going to be heavily critical of anyone opposing this idea who doesn't acknowledge that their own selfishness plays a part in the formation of their opinion because selfishness is scummy and, to me, if you're trying to hide that then you're trying to hide that you're being scummy.I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
In post 383, Nibbui wrote:
VOTE: MutantIn post 380, mutantdevle wrote:If we do decide that we should just be letting Kokichi win here then the less we say about our opinions on it the better.That way, a scum!kokichi has less information to go one when deciding if he should empower scum or town (the decision being based on whether he thinks we are all likely to want to lynch 1 on a scum flip of the other). But for now, I'm set on the idea of actively trying in this minigame. I'm not caught up yet so my opinion could change if I see a really strong mechanical case for it, but I doubt that'll happen.
I think you're scum right now tbh. I doubt that you can't see the problem with what you said here, even more when I actually already talked about that.
If we're letting Kokichi win, and we can only do that if the winner is publicly announced afterwards, we're going to vote by the HEAL: tag and who gets majority healing votes is the one to get unlocked.
I'd just like to emphasise this, I haven't read what you've said yet. I catch up in chronological order from the last post I've made in the thread and when I do start catching up I always jump back to the quote I just addressed On this occasion, I've also decided to reply in real time. I'm glad I did.In post 384, Nibbui wrote:Like, what you have been saying here is just too weird Mutant.
I don't even know how to fit it as a scum scheme or something yet, but definitely doesn't sound town to me.I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
What's questionable about it? Questionable of what alignment it's coming from? Because lying about this sort of power is a stupid idea and Kokichi isn't stupid. If they are lying about this role, then they're going to have a lot of explaining to do when no one claims being powered up. They'd be lynched for that. If they flip as actually having this role, then we'd lynch the person they claimed should have been empowered for not admitting it, so no scum in their right mind would withhold that information either (in fact, they'd want to claim it so that if they flipped scum it would make kokichi look bad).In post 252, Varsoon wrote:I also feel like his whole 'power a second person up' thing is very questionable.I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
When was I saying that we should just let kokichi decided? I think you've misread my post because I never said that. What I said was that I don't think we'd be able to come to a solid agreement on who kokichi should empower and hence kokichi would end up just choosing anyway because we can't decide. I don't think anyone thinks it's optimal for Kokichi to decide for himself regardless of their read on him.In post 387, Nibbui wrote:It's not even about letting Kokichi win or not. It's how you're theorizing we should let Kokichi decide if we let him win.
If you're so suspicious of Kokichi being scum, I don't think it would be a good idea to let him decide for himself.
This game works by plurality vote and therefore I don't see a problem with deciding who gets unlocked by plurality votes.
Also, I indeed do not want to get unlocked because my role is simply kinda useless.
This game doesn't work on plurality vote, it works on the majority. Plurality is just the most votes. That means if everyone has 1 vote each but one person has 2 votes then the person with 2 votes wins. If we empower someone who only 2 people think are town enough to be empowered then that completely defeats the point of having the vote.
Just to clarify, are you saying youknowwhat ability you'd unlock if you won the minigame? Because I'm only told which of my picks I'd unlock for doing so.I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
I'm not sure what to make of this tbh. It's like it goes against the whole premise of having minigames if the optimal thing to do is just hand the win to Kokichi everytime to empower as many people as possible. Even if Kokichi is scum, this would force them to empower town as well. It's like the minigames are supposed to be Kokichi vs Scum. I don't disbelieve the claim, it just makes me think it's a trap. Maybe the trap is just that if we let Kokichi try to win than it reduces the chances town even wins in the first place. Think about it, 3 scum working against 1 town. Town can't work together because that just gives info to the scum. Whereas, every member of the town trying to win means that town has a higher probability of winning.In post 264, Kokichi Oma wrote:Btw I forgot to mention. If I win a 2nd time I can unlock TWO more peoples roles.I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
I specifically meant that the less we talk about whether or not we'd lynch someone for being empowered by kokichi or kokichi themself depending if either of them flipped scum the better. Because, in my opinion, Kokichi is going to have to make some kind of choice between whoever we deem the most town if we follow that idea as I don't think we'd reach a majority. Sorry if I wasn't explicit in that opinion. It's kinda hard to explain it when it's so many hypotheticals embedded in each other. But the jist of it is that I think Kokichi making some sort of decision is inevitable if we do this even though we don't want him to and that's why the whole idea is bad.In post 391, Nibbui wrote:
If this isn't implying that we shouldn't restrict Kokichi choice Idk what it is.In post 380, mutantdevle wrote:If we do decide that we should just be letting Kokichi win here then the less we say about our opinions on it the better.
There's nothing in my role PM that suggests each ability is linked? Assuming all role formats are the same, I can see how you'd come to that conclusion though. Given the partial claims we've had, I think I'm just going to assume that the information we are given is different for each person and not get hung up on the details because they really don't matter until full claims are made.In post 391, Nibbui wrote:
I mean, isn't something similar to my primary ability/role? Because if it is I have a good idea of what might be (even the flavour suggest so) and it's not useful at all.In post 389, mutantdevle wrote:Just to clarify, are you saying youknowwhat ability you'd unlock if you won the minigame? Because I'm only told which of my picks I'd unlock for doing so.I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
I mean, if we do let kokichi win, then we are 100% doing the secondary vote. I'm currently under the impression that we are not letting kokichi win though.In post 395, Elbirn wrote:The implication as I understood it was that we should be having a secondary vote on who gets the minigame power. I'm not about that. Let's all play the game and go from there.I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
I've also always known RC as pushy and opinionated. But I don't think that thinking he's scum just because he's not doing that is a bad conclusion to make. Not only is it unlikely that he'd be that unaware of his play that he'd let something as obvious as that indicate his alignment, but he's also opinionated as both alignments. (Not opinionated enough to get me mislynched though )In post 266, ChibiBear wrote:I have half a mind to sheep his vote on RC though. I've only played 1 game with RC but he's a pretty opinionated and confident dude from what I've seen, it seems strange to me that he's actively refusing to post anything useful when there's plenty to talk about already.I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
I don't know if I'm just bad at explaining what I mean here if you just don't understand what I'm saying but this is what I mean:In post 404, Nibbui wrote:
Like, youIn post 398, mutantdevle wrote:
I mean, if we do let kokichi win, then we are 100% doing the secondary vote. I'm currently under the impression that we are not letting kokichi win though.In post 395, Elbirn wrote:The implication as I understood it was that we should be having a secondary vote on who gets the minigame power. I'm not about that. Let's all play the game and go from there.justsaid some posts before that it would be better to let Kokichi somewhat choose from more or less a pool in the matter and that a plurality vote was bad, but now you're saying that if we let Kokichi win,it's 100%the secondary vote. You just changed of opinion?
Mutant, are you scum for real? :/
I don't think we should let kokichi win.
But if we do, then who he empowers shouldgo to a vote.
However, I think that we willnot be able to reach a majorityon who gets empowered if we let kokichi win.
Hence,kokichi will make a final choicebetween the most popular candidates.
Andif that happens, the less information we've given about how we'd react to a scum flip surrounding the empowerment choice the better.
My concern is that letting kokichi win will always result in kokichi making some kind of choice even with the voting, but if kokichi wins then voting is 100% better than just leting kokichi choose. We have the same opinion here.I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
Can I town read someone because I like their sass?In post 267, Firebringer wrote:Chibi u haven’t contributed anything here so not sure why ur asking RC toI mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
Wait, why? Are you implying that his neighbourhoods are actually his scum buddies? Because if so then you'll need to be scum reading firebringer too. And if you just think that being in a neighbourhood is just scummy outside of that then you're going to need to explain why to me.In post 274, Varsoon wrote:P-EDIT: The fact you start in a neighborhood makes me think you're likelier scum than town.I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
In post 291, Nibbui wrote:
Oh, I see.In post 286, RadiantCowbells wrote:all the neighbourhoods were generated after the game started.
I wasn't invited to any though, sad.
I think it's probably best that people shouldn't be saying whether or not RC neighbourised them.In post 292, Elbirn wrote:Also who is the utter T H O T who didn't add me to a neighborhood
Somebody masonize me those are funI mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
Do you really think that you would gain nothing from Varsoon and RC getting into a 1v1? Maybe I'm not considering the greater meta-knowledge of their distaste for each other but I think any 1v1 can tell us something about the motivations of each player.In post 302, Elbirn wrote:On topic though, hot take: varsoon and RC, I've gathered you both have a masturbation contest at each other every game you play and I'm content to ignore the both of you so long as this goes on because I don't think anything AI can be gathered from the two of you interacting with each other. Hopefully you both start to chafe and give up soon and we can move alongI mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
Okay, now I've learnt some context I think that a 1v1 between RC and Varsoon is probably the worst thing that could happen in this game.In post 415, mutantdevle wrote:
Do you really think that you would gain nothing from Varsoon and RC getting into a 1v1? Maybe I'm not considering the greater meta-knowledge of their distaste for each other but I think any 1v1 can tell us something about the motivations of each player.In post 302, Elbirn wrote:On topic though, hot take: varsoon and RC, I've gathered you both have a masturbation contest at each other every game you play and I'm content to ignore the both of you so long as this goes on because I don't think anything AI can be gathered from the two of you interacting with each other. Hopefully you both start to chafe and give up soon and we can move alongI mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
Ahhh Not Known 15 don't do this. Think to yourself, "is my conclusion a massive leap in logic backed up by very little hard evidence?" If yes, posting = no.In post 369, Not Known 15 wrote:or they have some strange role(e.g. Traitor) or alignment that makes them play drastically different.I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
I really really don't like this post. Why would you say 4? It really just comes across as though you are trying to pretend that you have as little information as possible which is incredibly sketchy. With nothing to suggest otherwise, I see no logical reason as to why you'd possibly think there are 4 scum instead of 3.In post 373, Varsoon wrote:If you're town, I don't like those odds. 1 against, what? 4? In a SCAVENGER HUNT?I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
Could you explain this a little more please?In post 374, Nibbui wrote:Even if Kokichi is scum, in a Scavanger hunt I suppose scum already have the upperhand anyway, the odds that they're going to be winning are pretty high.I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
Where did you get the idea that people want to policy lynch those who don't want to just let kokichi win? I'm under the impression that most people intend that we all just play the minigame anyway.In post 376, Varsoon wrote:I'm hard against policy lynching people because they want to play the game the moderator designed.I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
@Nibbui, as I understand it, you were scum reading me off of a miscommunication and we actually have near enough the same opinion on whether or not we should let Kokichi win. Now that I've better explained my thoughts, has your opinion changed or do you still think I'm scum for X reasons?
Furthermore, unless I've got the wrong impression, Elbirn has the exact opinion that you were scum reading me for:In post 392, Elbirn wrote:Yeah I'm 100% against "leashing" the person who wins the minigame, Nibbui you can go kick rocks
So why aren't you criticising them?In post 395, Elbirn wrote:The implication as I understood it was that we should be having a secondary vote on who gets the minigame power. I'm not about that.
I think I know your answers to each of these questions, however, I want to see if I'm thinking correctly. There are bonus points available for your answers to these questions if it turns out that we are indeed thinking along the same wavelength.I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
When I first read this post I thought you just read this game, but you were in it?In post 406, Nibbui wrote:yeah but in Open 720 Mutant started this setup talk and there he sounded just as intellectually dishonest as he sounded here to me.
I scum read him there right off the bat and surprisingly he really was scum.
I'm not saying this is the same case at all or that I'm good on reading Mutant's alignment, it can even be very silly indeed, but dunno, I don't feel good about it right now.I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
In post 427, Varsoon wrote:It's a 13p game, means there is probably 4 scum to balance against the town powercreep.How do you know that the town's PRs aren't just weak? I personally don't think either of the things you've said there are logical conclusions to make. Maybe that's just my limited meta of expecting 3 scum in every 13p game and I acknowledge that you know more about setup design than I do. However, I still think that you said 4 in an attempt to appear less knowledgeable of the setup and your post here just gives me a strong impression that your motivation for that was a scummy one.
I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
fair enough. Though that was for specifically if we all agreed to let kokichi win.In post 431, Varsoon wrote:There was a proposed plan of lynching anyone who got the prize who wasn't Kokichi.I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
I thought that your problem was that you thought I wanted Kokichi to choose who they wanted to empower rather than voting?In post 436, Nibbui wrote:1 - Their tone and way of saying it are very different and more straightfoward
2 - My problem with you wasn't about not letting Kokichi win, it was your thought process to come to that conclusion and how your plan in case that Kokichi won sounded. If you only had said the "I only want to play the minigame" part I wouldn't see a problem there at all.
My 'plan' was me giving various reasons not to let kokichi win and giving my opinion on what we'd need to do if he did. These are both things that needed saying. First of all, just saying "I wanna play the mini" both neglects my other reasons for holding my opinion that kokichi shouldn't win and fails to convince anyone else that kokichi shouldn't be given a free win. If no one else shared my opinion, I wouldn't be able to just play the mini as I'd be lynched for not following the plan. The 'what if kokichi does win' statements also needed saying because we need to know how we're going to handle the situation if kokichi wins on his own accord anyway. So my question is, what's so scummy about thinking about that kind of stuff? Do you think that I shouldn't be planning ahead? If so, why does doing so make me scum?I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
I personally think this is an unfair criticism because I don't believe anything I said was misleading in the slightest - at most, my thoughts weren't laid it in the most preferable order which led to some confusion. I also don't understand why it was so bad to consider giving the free win to kokichi to be a bad thing before the question of public announcement was brought into play.In post 440, Nibbui wrote:What sounded scummy to me was that you tried to make the idea of Kokichi a free win sound bad with misleading arguments or not-fully-thought arguments imo. What you seem to love to try to do as scum. Giving Kokichi the win here in certain conditions would be very helpful, and unhappily, we don't have these conditions at least for now. However, you tried to convince that it was a bad plan even before knowing or not if the winner was publicly announced.
I'd also caution you on considering giving kokichi a free win later in the game. Kokichi's role is first and foremost a trap. It sounds all well and good having 2 people unlock the quest but only having 1 town work towards the quest whilst all 3 scum are working on it pretty much guarantees scum will win. And in that sense, I think that giving kokichi a free win is actually pro-scum. I think using kokichi's role should only be used as a last resort in the late game. Forgive me if I've gone on about this whole topic a little too much but mechanical solving has always been my preference and if I'm not around to restate these opinions when they come to matter then I'd at least want them to be a prominent part of my iso so people can be reminded of these points.I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
Because that's his roleIn post 447, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why do you think RC created the hoods mentioned so far?
I don't really know what you're asking me here or even why you're asking me instead of RC but I think my answer is "I think RC neighbourised Firebringer because they get on well with each other".I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
Damn. I hope the future minigames aren't so dependant on being online immediately. Sleep + College = A sad mutant in regards to this game.In post 519, jjh927 wrote:Yo so I definitely have a winner but I have to total up some wrong answer penalties to find out which person it is
Really we're all winners if we had fun but sadly having fun doesn't unlock your minigame role PM
Also I'm having my girlfriend over for dinner so my priorities are way elsewhere and don't expect me to close the minigame for a whileI mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
If you want to convince people to follow your vote then you might want to actually explain why you're voting here. Because all I can see of your reasoning is simple "she claimed".In post 543, Not Known 15 wrote:Vote MariaR.I mostly just lurk now.