Hoctac.......
why
Hoctac.......
Are you an alt and do I know you from another game? (can just say "yes" if you don't want to reveal who)In post 33, shiki wrote:i would have assumed it was for my and datisi's benefit or a tribute to saudade had it not included umlaut.In post 24, Hoctac wrote:You realise they probably assumed I was joking until you just said that... right?
Okay, because it sounded like you were saying something about me in particular involved and was wondering how you would meta read me like that.In post 38, shiki wrote:technically i am an alt (team rocket queen) and i do not believe you know me from another game unless you were playing on an alt.In post 35, Umlaut wrote:Are you an alt and do I know you from another game? (can just say "yes" if you don't want to reveal who)
Come back to us, we miss you already.
I mean when you vote someone with 0 posts a few pages in, I assume it's because they have 0 posts.In post 114, HoldenGolden wrote:Who said it had anything to do with lurking?
Then George and Monkey can say that.In post 122, HoldenGolden wrote:But how is number 1 different? For all you know George and Monkey is RVS Madoka.In post 116, Umlaut wrote:1. That was RVS
2. Showing up and leaving is different from never showing up
Yes, I do think it's more accurate to say Hiraki is lurking than Madoka, which is why I think voting him and keeping my vote their is productive since it might produce some kind of actual pressure while voting Madoka is just a null-op.As for two:Can you not say the same thing for someone who dropped a vote and peaced? Is that not defined as lurking as well? I would even say it is more proper to say Hiraki is lurking than Madoka since Madoka could of just not woke up yet to play?In post 120, Umlaut wrote:I mean when you vote someone with 0 posts a few pages in, I assume it's because they have 0 posts.In post 114, HoldenGolden wrote:Who said it had anything to do with lurking?
I might just be assuming people play in the way I think is good play. If I move my vote it means I actually think the new one is better than the old for some reason, so unless someone is just joining the game I'm going to figure their vote is for some kind of reason even if it's not a very strong one.I'm puzzled on why you assumed that wagon was had logic behind it (lurker wagon) and not a RVS bandwagon considering all that was said was literally the votes.
See, this is a good answer (would be better if it weren't preceded by my Guide to What a Town Vote Looks Like to Me, but it's still good).In post 146, GeorgeBailey wrote:I think my vote is better placed on a complete null slot than Datisi right now.In post 137, Umlaut wrote:@George, @Monkey Are the Madoka votes for any kind of reason?
No one particularly scum pings me right now, and at the time I didn't feel comfortable bringing Hiraki to L-1.
You're right, instead of just asking why, I asked why and made a guess. Are you going somewhere with this?In post 112, Umlaut wrote:Alsowhy are we wagoning the person who isn't even here?Lurking is bad but complete absence isn't lurking.
This is obviously just going to be a constant distraction until it's settled, so whatever, I'll address it.In post 153, humaneatingmonkey wrote:ill say it straight up. i dont believe this mason claim.
i can't even get a read on umlaut and hoctac without putting the claim in close inspection, which wouldn't be in our best interest. but they're the ones bringing it up so let's do it.
they seem to be AT LEAST informed about each others' alignment.
im just figuring out if they're SvS or TvT. TvS might be possible, but convoluted.
i'm thinking that this will sort itself in a future massclaim, but even then it's very dangerous to believe their claim if they've shown that they can lie about their roles.
i have no idea where to proceed from here.
I don't know Datisi's usual vibrant self, could you elaborate this into something others can agree or disagree with?In post 160, Hoctac wrote:Feels less like her usual vibrant self and the Umlaut vote.
Someone can tell me if I'm wrong but I'm pretty sure the premade setups are single-use, so this is not one that has been played before (unless it just happens to coincidentally be the same as some random game from four years ago or something)In post 178, Datisi wrote:i'd guess these setups are pulled at random from the approved premade setups.
I mean 169 itself could go either way, it's more in combination with 175 that it seems like you are trying to give the real reason for your vote instead of the best reason, if that makes sense. I don't really see the overdefensiveness that Madoka is talking about, and it seems like an easy thing to pick at, but I don't think picking at easy things is necessarily scummy.In post 233, Datisi wrote:Umlaut, why do you find my 167 towny? What do you make of Madoka finding it scummy?
I know why I'm voting him, why are you voting him?
Yeah, it was "you can't just ask that" and not "stop asking that," I didn't mean it to be a direct quote. I meant that you backed off of asking the question in a way that strikes me as conciliatory.In post 239, GeorgeBailey wrote:Could you show me where Datisi says this? I only remember him saying "You can't just ask that" and then I talked about it more.....
In post 248, Hoctac wrote:Hey, George, give us a shotgun readlist! Go go go
Not a great read list there.In post 249, GeorgeBailey wrote:A lot of gut feelings around here. You sure you all don't have tape worms?
I would never club a penguin, this is a vicious lie.In post 340, Hoctac wrote:If anyone needs a metaread on Umlaut this game, just hit me up. We've been playing mafia together for years from Town of Salem to youtube comments, to even club penguin chatrooms. We go way back.
Is there a reason you're not voting him then?In post 328, Madoka wrote:I am leaning Hiraki as the best choice currently.
Okay, so I saw this and wasn't sure what Hiraki was talking about because I couldn't remember a game that went like he described. I've looked through my own games and the only one I can see where we even were on opposite sides is Open 679, and I don't recall you especially commenting on being in the same place I was in that game. Also I was scum and you were town, which is not really the possibility I was trying to discount there.In post 319, Hiraki wrote:We have done this before and been on the flip side though. Not sure what your point is here.In post 230, Umlaut wrote:I like that he says he's in the same place I am on reads in 160 because we've been in the same place like that in past games where we were both town.
Thanks for feeing my ego here.In post 414, Hiraki wrote:Weird pocketing. That game still scars me.In post 390, Umlaut wrote:Also I just don't really see why the pushback on this. What's wrong with my finding something you did towny, if you did it and you're town?
I'm not seeing that he's really all that involved, can you substantiate this a bit more?In post 442, Madoka wrote:He is more involved. In the previous, he was quite lurky.In post 438, Hoctac wrote:How is George's play different here?
I've gotten in plenty of TvT fights where we were both genuinely convinced the other was scum.In post 461, GeorgeBailey wrote:Huh, TvT fights, from my personal experience, usually revolve around stupid pedantics on definitions or non-trivial issues that only Town would care about. Then usually someone's feeling get hurt, or someone rages.
Can you explain why you picked this one? I don't recall you really saying you think Hiraki is scum, and I do recall you really saying you think Monkey is scum.In post 466, GeorgeBailey wrote:Don't give me flashbacks like thatIn post 465, Hoctac wrote:This is revenge for Fusion.
VOTE: HirakiIn post 464, HoldenGolden wrote:Which one do you pick.
Can you point to what GeorgeBailey has said or done that led you to consider him actively engaged in the game?
EBWOP: Mason claimIn post 571, Umlaut wrote:it would confirm mafia believed the neighbor claim
I'd rather you explain this first. But I don't recall thinking you were more openly suspicious than average.In post 578, Umlaut wrote:Datisi's stated scumpool yesterday was Hiraki and Madoka, and he had George as a townread. George was at L-1 and Hiraki was the counterwagon. Suddenly Datisi hammers George?
Kind of curious why the "motherfucker"? Why be angry at me if you think I'm scum who caught myself for you?
Suppose a genie tells you I'm town, who is it then?In post 621, humaneatingmonkey wrote:It's either Umlaut + Hiraki or Umlaut + Madoka
I can't quite parse this sentence. Of course I'm aware I'm unconfirmed to others, that's why I didn't make myself green, but I'm not going to just wall off the fact that I'm town and refuse to take it into account when I'm giving my perspective on the game.In post 677, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Oh is blue PR color? I just wanted to emphasize that Umlaut and Hiraki are both unconfirmed in a green wagon and Umlaut is still working on a narrative that it's not an obvious counterwagon to Hiraki.
I don't like this, you are backing off an explanation given by your top scumread way too fast.In post 681, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Okay fair enough
The point I'm making here is, if you're town and I'm town, then GeorgeBailey was an all-town mislynch. I don't believe scum are willing to trust an all-town mislynch to actually go through, in which case there would have to be a scum off the wagon who was prepared to jump on if need be to secure the lynch. (On further reading I've decided that if there was such a player, it was HEM, as I detail in my followup posts)In post 727, Hiraki wrote:??? this doesn't make senseIn post 671, Umlaut wrote:To rule out the all-town possibility I want to read through and see if there was any of {HEM, Madoka, shiki} were either null or inconsistent or wishy-washy on GeorgeBailey, because even if they would prefer to stay off a mislynch I'd think scum would want to leave open at least the possibility of self-consistently voting for him if it was necessary to push the wagon over the edge. If not then Hiraki is pretty much definitely scum afaic.
I'll actually be very curious to find out post-game if this is really what was going on, because at no point do I think Hoctac was really townreading me, and the timestamp of those messages you are referring to are right around the time he made his post #65 in the neighborhood, which I just filed under "joking" in my summary but where what he literally said was, if I'm scum, I should go ahead and kill him for the towncred.In post 637, shiki wrote:i feel pretty strongly that umlaut is scum here.In post 156, Umlaut wrote:I have never, ever fakeclaimed as town and I have gone on record as saying it's pretty much always anti-town to do so. Feel free to through my games and confirm. I'm telling you I'm a mason with Hoctac. So either you think I'm a mason with Hoctac, or you think I'm scum and probably he is too.
ohh. hoctac is hectic. in that case, i am quite certain that hoctac thought umlaut was mafia as well. this:In post 599, Datisi wrote:err, hoctac*.
is referring to this post by hectic in mystery box hate:In post 501, Hoctac wrote:No, shiki, it's in the same view as the murder mystery conspiracy.
which i thought was referring to a game called muskoka murder mystery as i discussed in my neighbourhood from mystery box here:In post 277, Hectic wrote:There's something that really intrigues me about this game; it feels more like some kind of murder mystery and less like a mafia game.
viewtopic.php?p=11766940#p11766940
one of the posts made by the player that replaced super mario's slot in the murder mystery game contained a typo (mt instead of my) that read as though it was giving a read of one of the players in mystery box (morning tweet) that hectic wanted to communicate under the radar.
i believe hoctac's typo here:
was intentional to remind me of this. the game that hoctac is referencing with this post:In post 502, Hoctac wrote:*the same vien
is the same game that madoka linked earlier: mini normal 2118. the specific post it is linked to is this one:
viewtopic.php?p=11613226#p11613226
which is an accusation by dsjstr of his neighbour, ame. if applied to the situation of this game, i believe hoctac was confirming that i had correctly deduced that he was in fact a neighbour (and lying about his role, as he did in mystery box also) and conveying to me his read of umlaut in case he died in the night.
I get that you're tired. Once you get some rest can you come back and point to this lot of evidence more explicitly?In post 732, Hiraki wrote:actually im tired so ill just do it quickly, there is actually a lot of evidence of an all-town george bailey lynch and that scum were trying to stay off the wagons. i am pretty confident that the scum are off the wagon rather than on the wagon at this point
I mean it's "bad" in the sense that it was a mislynch, but I don't think voting for what in retrospect was a mislynch is inherently suspicious if that's what you're saying. There is a little more nuance to the argument than that.In post 736, humaneatingmonkey wrote:What I see here is forcing a false dichotomy that lynching GeorgeBailey = bad. I don't think that's true. Gamestate forced us to a single wagon. That's what needs analysis
I'm terrible at guessing games, how many?In post 744, Hiraki wrote:1) how many times has HEM flagrantly lied this game about his past performance?