Oldy Mafia (Game Over, who won?)
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
Glork
Minor attack on Flameaxe, called inHim Fritz protown
Not feeling UT wagon
vote on Ecto
Fritz, CES, inHim solidly protown
liked CTD
more aggressive defense of UT
Surprisingly aggressive defense of a townie.Glork wrote:As far as not feeling the UT wagon, it is extremely lazy. A bit more lazy than I'd expect from this group of players, once we got out of the random bullshit stage. I have some minor misgivings about UT's behavior since garnering some pressure (in particular, I think CTD's "UT has clammed up" comment is right on the money), but it's not enough to convince me that he needs dead. If a UT lynch goes through and he flips town, I'd expect the wagon to be chock full of scums -- most likely two in the {Flameaxe, chamber, Mert} block, with a possible token pile-on at the end of the wagon.
Went after MBL mid-aggressively for coaching Ecto to play better
calls Ythill and inhim protown
Right before deadline, Glork goes aggressively after MBL, setting him up for a possible vig if Ecto comes up town.
Calls DGB protown
Before Ecto claims, tries to keep the wagon on him alive
calls Shanba possible scum
continues to try to set MBL up as scum if Ecto comes up town, hops off Ecto wagon
start of D2, suspects Shanba, Yos, Huck
Switches to Shanba.Glork wrote:I'm pretty sure that one of the prior alternate wagons {MBL, inHim, Yos} was scum.Glork wrote:I still don't think CES is all that likely to be scum. He's not acting like the complete obvtownCES that I saw yesterday, but my D1 read of him trumps what little questionalbe content I have seen.Glork wrote:I would also prefer a Shanba lynch over a UT/CDB lynch, because (and this may sound stupid because of its metagaming nature) I think UT would have stayed around and kept superlurking if he were scum, rather than replacing out. Shanba fits the bill of Lurkerscum much more than UT/CDB.Glork, December 14th wrote:DGB, you may be onto something here. I'm still not convinced on CES, but I'm liking both Shanba and CDB as lynchfodder today.Glork, Dec 15th wrote:Ether!!
Shanba is definitely scum. You should definitely sheep me. He definitely needs lynched today.
Attacks Shanba for defending CDB. REALLY wants Shanba dead instead of CDB.Dec 16, 11:22PM wrote:Unvote
Vote: ChannelDelibird
Wagon go go go go go.Glork, Dec 18 wrote:Either Shanba is trying to earn superduperbrowniepoints by going "see, ITY he wasn't scum" when CDB does die, or he's trying to make sure that the wagon doesn't actually build (at least, not before CDB has a chance to actually participate in the game).Glork, Dec 18, 4:30pm wrote:Shanbawagon wasn't going anywhere. I'm willing to put the cart before the horse in this case, if absolutely necessary. I would still strongly prefer a Shanbalynch over a CDBlynch, though.Glork, Dec 19th wrote:
Nah, CES is probably town.DrippingGoofball wrote:No objection if I vig CES, then?Glork, Dec 22 wrote:I like Gurgi's posting (and not just because he thinks I'm town).
I'm becoming less interested in a CDB lynch. It is more stagnant than the push against Shanba was. That said, he makes a reasonable vig/investigation target.
Unvote
Vote: Yosarian2
(note: completely abandons inclusion of CDB as a lynch target)Dec 22 wrote:One of {Yos/Shanba} needs to be lynched today. The other needs to be vigged. There is no in-between, and I probably won't be moving my vote off of these two players.dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
Why did Glork absolutely freak out here:
http://mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.ph ... 9#p2686869
Also note, Glork made odd reference to why his play makes no sense if he and CDB are scum together:
http://mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.ph ... 4#p2687904dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
The question is, how sure are you that one of Poro/CDB is scum? I'm pretty sure. Not positive, but probably willing to risk it. The alternative is that we lynch a second tier suspect (CES, Gurgi, MBL, Ether, Zorblag).
If we allow CDB to vote Poro and there's no quicklynch by scum, then we've narrowed our decision for today to those two.dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
Please explain how it was better to no-lynch quickly than to have Shanba give us his full suspicions. Even if Shanba had claimed/softclaimed vanilla, how would that have affected the day/night's events negatively?Ether wrote:The one that you did your best to fuck up by having Shanba out himself as vanilla first?dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
So you thought Gurgi or myself was a power role, and you wanted to make sure Shanba died instead, and fast.
Except you thought I was scum. So you weren't worried about me having a role.
You were so confident that Gurgi was a power role, that you thought it was more important to kill Shanba off fast in hopes that Gurgi was a roled player.
What made you so confident that Gurgi was roled?
Personally, I think you're full of shit. Also, you haven't made a case on me. Mush.dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
Also, I read some of your previous play as town and as scum yesterday. Those games don't read anything like this game. You actually made cases in those games, both as town and as scum. In this game, you just pester and nag and try to look good, as opposed to not so much caring how you look while you try to lay out details of cases. Which you did in the other games, except in those you actually listed evidence pro/con about other players and made nuanced cases.
Also, I didn't see obvious evidence of an Ethertown meta or of an Etherscum meta. You played fairly similar on both sides. You sounded competent, unlike in this game.dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
Sigh.Ether wrote:January 25, Post 2397, Gurgi wrote:That said Ether is doing agreatjob of making MBL look really scummy.January 27, Post 2466, Gurgi to HackerHuck wrote:So what's your reasoning for MBL being scum. Extra points if you use your own analysis!January 30, Post 2522, Gurgi wrote:CTD: I still don't grasp how you can think MBL is scum. Like, even remotely so.February 2, Post 2551, Ether (never got a response) wrote:And Gurgi to detail The Saga of What He Thinks of MBL.
Hi, Gurgi. What the hell are you doing? (I'm also surprised that I'm the one calling you out on this instead of MBL, heh.)February 5, Post 2607, Gurgi's list wrote:Huck, you, and MBL is inching his way down there.MrBuddyLee, Feb 5 wrote:
Why, because Ether says so? I don't think my play's changed since D1/D2, so I'm fascinated to find out why you're suddenly finding me scummy.Lord Gurgi wrote:MBL is inching his way down there.
Ether, take a deep breath, close your eyes, do some yoga, and for a brief moment in time imagine a world in which MBL is NOT scum.
Who are your top two scum candidates in that world?dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
random vote phase
UT on Glork
chamber, Porochaz on CDB
CES on Glork
Gurgi, Ether on chamber
D1
Flameaxe, chamber, CES, Glork on CDB
D2/D3
Gurgi-chamber
chamber-CDB
ChannelDelibird (6) -- DrippingGoofball, Glork, chamber, Cogito Ergo Sum, Ythill, Ether
post-counterclaim (ignoring this for subsequent analysis--one or more scum HAD to bus Glork, so they abandoned their no-bus strategy here):
CDB, Porochaz, CES, Gurgi, MBL--Glork
Glork--CES
Ether-Porochaz
chamber-Porochaz
D4/5
Ether-MBL
Everyone else was on Huck
D6 (not taking this into account yet in subsequent analyses)
CES-CDB
CDB-Poro
CDB-CES-Poro
CES voted CDB(UT) D1
Glork protected CES from vig
Glork pushed Shanba over CDB, defended CDB
CDB-CES-Gurgi
CES voted CDB(UT) D1
Glork protected CES from vig
Gurgi protected CDB
Glork pushed Shanba over CDB, defended CDB
CDB-CES-Zorblag
CES voted CDB(UT) D1
chamber voted CDB a lot
Glork protected CES from vig
Glork pushed Shanba over CDB, defended CDB
CDB-Poro-Zorblag
chamber voted CDB a lot
chamber pushed Porochaz as a Glork alternative
Glork pushed Shanba over CDB, defended CDB
CDB-Poro-Gurgi
Flameaxe was on D1 CDB(UT) wagon
Gurgi protected CDB
Glork pushed Shanba over CDB, defended CDB
CDB-Zorblag-Gurgi
Gurgi voted chamber a lot
chamber voted CDB a lot
Gurgi protected CDB
Glork pushed Shanba over CDB, defended CDB
CES-Poro-Zorblag
chamber pushed Porochaz as a Glork alternative
Glork protected CES from vig
CES-Poro-Gurgi
*** never voted each other ***
Glork protected CES from vig
CES-Zorblag-Gurgi
Gurgi voted chamber a lot
Glork protected CES from vig
Poro-Zorblag-Gurgi
Gurgi voted chamber a lot
chamber pushed Porochaz as a Glork alternative
CDB-CES-Ether
CES voted CDB(UT) D1
Ether protected Glork
Glork protected CES from vig
Glork pushed Shanba over CDB, defended CDB
Ether protected CDB, CDB protected Ether
CDB-Poro-Ether
Flameaxe was on D1 CDB(UT) wagon
Ether pushed Poro as Glork alternative
Ether protected Glork
Glork pushed Shanba over CDB, defended CDB
Ether protected CDB, CDB protected Ether
CDB-Gurgi-Ether
*** never voted each other, protected each other (Ether and Gurgi (and Glork) protected CDB) ***
Ether protected Glork
Gurgi protected CDB
Glork pushed Shanba over CDB, defended CDB
Ether protected CDB, CDB protected Ether
CDB-Zorblag-Ether
chamber pushed CDB a lot
Ether protected Glork
Glork pushed Shanba over CDB, defended CDB
Ether protected CDB, CDB protected Ether
CES-Poro-Ether
Ether pushed Poro as Glork alternative
Ether protected Glork
Glork protected CES from vig
CES-Gurgi-Ether
*** never voted each other ***
Ether protected Glork
Glork protected CES from vig
CES-Zorblag-Ether
*** never voted each other, Ether cast mild aspersions upon both but never voted ***
Ether protected Glork
Glork protected CES from vig
Poro-Gurgi-Ether
Ether pushed Poro as Glork alternative
Ether protected Glork
Poro-Zorblag-Ether
Ether pushed Poro as Glork alternative
Ether protected Glork
Gurgi-Zorblag-Ether
Gurgi voted chamber a lot
Ether protected Glork
Questions to touch upon:
* Was the D1 UT wagon meaningful?
* Was the D2 CDB-wagon meaningful?
* Was Glork's D2 protection of CES and CDB meaningful?
* Was Ether's protection of Glork meaningful?
* Was the push of Poro over Glork D3 meaningful?
* How much busing has there been?
Possible buses are pretty minimal:
At least one scum bused Glork when he counterclaimed, either Poro+CDB early, CES off and on, or Gurgi late.
Wagons on CDB D1/D2 (note--the sameCES-chamber-Glork-Etherwas on both CDB and Shanba D2--chamber-CES-Glorkwere all on UT(CDB) D1 withstark(Ether)locked on Ecto all day)
chamber on CDB forever
Gurgi on chamber forever
Ether on Porochaz inconsistently (says due to Huck investigation)dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
You have? I just read back through December 17th and couldn't find a hint of a case you've made against either. Please indulge me by emptyquoting your old cases/arguments for those two being scum.Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:MrBuddyLee wrote:Who do you want lynched and why?Channel/Prozac. I've already said why.
I just read that stretch of your posts again. You never made any kind of case on either or stated any facts in support of your belief that they're scum. Not one.
This time, you're not wagoning. Please make your cases, or point us to the previous cases you claim you've made on those two.dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
1) Can you please give me some specific examples of living players (Gurgi, CES, CDB, Zorblag, MBL) who have been right about stuff this game?Porochaz wrote:Ether due to failing to be right about anythingand a toss up between CES and CDB, CDB for mainly the same reasons as me. (Except in my view worse) and CES for thelynch happinessbut when I think back,what has he actually done this game?
2) Can you please compare CES's play to Zorblag's, Ether's and Gurgi's and let me know why you think CES has done less this game than those three?
3) Can you please explain CES's "lynch-happiness" and why, specifically, you have a problem with it?dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
MrBuddyLee wrote:So you thought Gurgi or myself was a power role, and you wanted to make sure Shanba died instead, and fast.
Except you thought I was scum. So you weren't worried about me having a role.
You were so confident that Gurgi was a power role, that you thought it was more important to kill Shanba off fast in hopes that Gurgi was a roled player.
What made you so confident that Gurgi was roled?
Also, you haven't made a case on me. Mush.dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
Lord Gurgi wrote:Zorblag:I don't think Prozac is town.But other people are much scummier yet.Gurgi wrote:Re: CDB. I've always had the same problem with his lynch that it's been primarily a lurker lynch, and I feel like lurker lynches are really easy for anyone to get onto without thinking too hard about it. I still think that about the CDB lynch, butit's a better lynch than Prozac.
Please clearly explain your positions on Prozac, CES and CDB.Lord Gurgi wrote:I still don't like the CES or Prozac lynchtoo muchdialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
Zorblag, check out the action between DGB and Glork on day two. Glork was defending CDB a bit while going after Shanba. DGB attacked Glork for protecting CDB. Glork briefly went after CDB halfheartedly and made excuses to switch back to Shanba. Glork pushed vigs of Shanba and Yos over a CDB or CES vig when DGB asked him.
The idea of being tied to CDB seemed to freak Glork out, and he seemed to fear CDB getting lynched/vigged and himself looking bad by association. I am not certain about that.
I'm not sure I see the motivation for Glork to protect a townie there, unless it's a great headfake. Kind of fits into the whole "town went after 4 townies D1, so let's not bus each other D2" mentality.
Let me know what you think.dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
If CDB's town, it's game over unless both Poro and CES are scum, right? But after the way CDB quickvoted Porochaz without worrying about the implications, plus all other considerations D1/D2 especially, his township's seriously in question.
Let's look at what the dead have to say:
CrashTextDummie wanted CDB lynched every.single.day.
Ythill was incorrect about HH/MBL but thought the last two were Prozac and CDB/chamber
Yos was null on CDB
Huck said 2 out of (CDB,CES,Poro) are scum and listed CDB as third scummiest player
DGB was on fire about CES, Glork and CDB and was killed for threatening to vig them:DrippingGoofball wrote:Also, I'd like to see some rich, dark, chocolatey scum hunting from Glork. He's scoring high on the scumputer, I expect more from him.
UT/CDB player slot is nearly confirmed scum by the shameless lurking and wagoning, at this point. Post #858 is seven different kinds of bad.DrippingGoofball wrote:I'm so enamored with InHim, that I'm willing to jump the gun and sun the scumputer with him pegged as town.
SCUMPUTER 2.1
140 Glork
133 CES
115 chamber
93 UT/CDB
78 Flameaxe/PoroDrippingGoofball wrote:SCUMPUTER 2.1.1Just for fun, this one includes HH & CTD as townies.
193 CES
150 Glork
130 chamber
110 UT/CDB
100 Flameaxe/PoroDrippingGoofball wrote:Also, I have a town read on chamber, despite his high scumputer ranking. He's super in-our-faces and constantly pushing the envelope and needling me, I may be wrong, but I expect scum to react more like CES.DrippingGoofball wrote:ChannelDelibird wrote:DGB's analysis is tl;dr for me.Cliff Notes:
You're scum and CES is your buddy.DrippingGoofball wrote:@ Glork
Are you alwaysTHIS MUCHof a bandwagon enthusiast?
After I take care of CES (the time for players to register their protests is NOW), you're next down the scumputer list.
I might actually have to check out some old games of yours.DrippingGoofball wrote:Don't give me that stagnation bizniss, Glorkster. You say we should waste an investigation him????WUT!!! HAVE YOU LOST YOUR MIND??? Waste an investigation on a useless lurker??? Why not aVIG SHOT?????????????????? Aninvestigation???????? Instead of a vig shot??????? Are you drunk? High? Passed out? Are you hoping some idiot player is going to investigate CDB who has contributed nothing while maybe I also vig him???????????? Are you CDB's buddy???
</blink>
If CDB fails to show up with the necessary fakeclaim, he'll be considered "given up scum" and will be lynched without further ceremony or gnashing of teeth. If you're sentimental, look away.
-OR-
If for some reason we're not lynching CDB...
We're lynchingGlork.
ONE OF THESE TWO IS SCUM. MAYBE BOTH. We lynch one, I vig the other.DrippingGoofball wrote:
I wish I had a nuclear warhead.Shanba wrote:Which reminds me: DGBEEEE. What do you make of flameaxe/prozac?DrippingGoofball wrote:CES hasn't done anything significant in a while, he's lurking in plain sight.
He should speak out now, he might not be here tomorrow morning.DrippingGoofball wrote:
That would be one epic messing around, drawing the scum roleblock (if available) and the NK, while letting the real vig do his work unimpeded! I can just imagine the dismay in the QT, "Ythill wrote:Oh, are you officially claiming vig now? I thought you were still just messing around.oh krap, DGB was just a plain old vanilla townie messing with us! Dammit!!! How come the real vig shot one of us in the meantime! How did DGB figure out the real vig would"knowthat she's messing around???
I'm probably one of the few people that could pull a gambit like that off, because everyone knows I love a good gambit, and the real vig would know that, too.
This being said, I knew that when I chose to shoot Fritzler, I was totally outing myself.DrippingGoofball wrote:
You realize that you die tonight, no matter what?Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:I've read up to page 51. 1184 was mucho convincing.Unvote, vote: YosDrippingGoofball wrote:Re:CES
Note that in this game, CES didn't receive a single vote (certainly not one that I noticed).
He was scum.
No one ever voted him.
So, everyone, please consider this before you declare CES to be town.
Ask yourself, is it the lack of opinions that is "townie," or the shameless bandwagoning on successful wagons?DrippingGoofball wrote:Also, in case there is a quicklynch, CES is scum. Please remember that and kill him good and dead.DrippingGoofball wrote:CES
CES is scum
dammitDrippingGoofball wrote:
I want a CES lynch. When he flips scum, you will all adore me.MrBuddyLee wrote:unvote
Let's get everyone fully on the record here.DrippingGoofball wrote:
You should know, thanks for the info, we should lynch you now.Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:I tend to think all 3 are town too.DrippingGoofball wrote:CDB is still scum, too.DrippingGoofball wrote:CES has made NO EFFORT to convince ME that he's town.
That's because him & his team of mafia henchmen can NK me, or roleblock me.
He's un-phased.
Can we kill him? I'd really like to see him lynch, so I can taste triumph.DrippingGoofball wrote:Am I intrigued by the prospect of a Glork lynch. Count me in as officially interested.
/salute DGBdialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
Ether suspects/suspected Glork-MBL. Have you really not gone over Glork's D1 play to see if Glork-MBL even makes sense as a scumpair? He made a clear attempt to get me lynched/vigged D1, and laid the groundwork for a 1-2 punch if/when Ecto came up town.Lord Gurgi wrote:I'm not sure why I didn't use Glork's alignment, actually. Who was the one that was constantly worrying about a Glork-MBL scumteam?
1) There's no reason why the dead's individual observations and gut should be any less valid.. they just had less information to work with. Picking out the best evidence brought up by dead townies is a solid way to help narrow down who the scum might be. Shanba had a solid town read on Ether.. are we supposed to ignore that since he's dead and lynched HackerHuck? Ythill said "CTD, Shanba, Ether and Gurgi are town, sheep them" or something like that. It's worth following his logic to see if he made points that can help us.Lord Gurgi wrote:I really dislike the quoth the dead thing MBL has going on here. There's no reason why the dead should be right, and they should probably be less right. Most of those dead were killed by the town, too. What are you trying to accomplish here except get voices to agree with you?
2) DGB was fairly obviously killed because she was right. DGB had at least 2 scum in the top 5 of her scumputer. If neither you nor Ether are scum, DGB hadin her scumputer top 5. It's stunning that you'd say "don't look closer at why DGB thought these people were scum".ALL FOUR SCUMdialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
Lord Gurgi wrote:The problem with citing the dead is that they can't disagree anymore, or change their opinions in light of new information. This guy who died and is town agreed with me, so we must be right. Townies (sadly) are not in their nature more likely to be correct. If you don't believe that new information helps improve your chances of being right, I don't know what to say. If you do, then you should agree that the dead are fundamentally less likely to be right than the living. I could understand if you had gone with DGB's arguments primarily, but you decided to wide-net this one. I don't like it.
Are you seriously telling me CTD and Huck would have significantly different opinions now than they had when they died? Or Shanba?MrBuddyLee wrote:Let's look at what the dead have to say:
CrashTextDummie wanted CDB lynched every.single.day.
Ythill was incorrect about HH/MBL but thought the last two were Prozac and CDB/chamber
Yos was null on CDB
Huck said 2 out of (CDB,CES,Poro) are scum and listed CDB as third scummiest player
DGB was on fire about CES, Glork and CDB and was killed for threatening to vig them
By the way, Shanba suspected Prozac most and was meh on CDB. I really wanted to see if his opinion shifted after the Huck lynch, but you guys botched it. Here were his last thoughts:Shanba wrote:I'm actually somewhat disturbed by my company on the (Huck)wagon, if I'm totally honest. The three people I trust most are not on the wagon. As such I'm seriously considering swapping over to prozac...
Pretty sure that means Shanba trusted me, CTD and Ether most. I'm pretty sure his suspicions were ordered Poro->CES->CDB/chamber->Gurgi. His vote should count for something, to be honest, especially considering at least two scum voted to quick-lynch so Shanba'd be silenced for good.Patrick wrote:HackerHuck (5) -- Cogito Ergo Sum, ChannelDelibird, Lord Gurgi, Shanba, Zorblag
ChannelDelibird (2) -- CrashTextDummie, MrBuddyLee
Porochaz (1) -- HackerHuck
MrBuddyLee (1) -- Ether
Not voting: Porochazdialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
Ether's in prod range. I look forward to her answering my questions--I particularly want to hear why she was so sure Gurgi was roled that she had to kill Shanba before he could speak. I also want to see her case on me--whatever amazing case it is that she switched off "obvscum" Porochaz and wasn't voting Huck for most of the day even though she'd "suspected" him for days.dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
* CES claimed vanilla
* Gurgi did not hint at a role
* Ether wanted Shanba NKed before he had a chance to post that he might be vanilla, because she thought there was a town role still out
* Ether obviously thought CES or Gurgi had a role
Possible conclusions:
1) There was some post by Gurgi that made Ether positive he had a role
2) CES is scum with a role, and Ether screwed up by telling us she's waiting for him to give results today
Ether, you're playing to your scum meta. You've been prodded. Please reply.dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
If Flameaxe(Porochaz) is town, this was the first person to spot Glork as possible scum. If Flameaxe is scum, this http://mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.ph ... 0#p2645950 was a pretty sloppy post clearing a bunch of townies (Yos,Mert,Shanba,Gurgi,MBL,Ecto,stark) and pointing to CES, UT(CDB), HackerHuck and his scumpartner Glork as scum.
So what was weird about Glork's catchup post?Flameaxe wrote:7) Glork
-I like some parts, indifferent about others here. His catchup post seems fine on paper, but I'm getting aweird gutread about it. Can't really explain it. I'm going to try to work on finding words to explain it. I'm liking his posts since then without anyweird gutfeelings.
-Leaning town'weird gut'read?
Summary:Glork wrote:Goddamn, there are waytoo many people in this game who I would blindly wagon with D1. What happens ifYos,CES, andFritzall tell me to vote for different people? Does the world explode?
Mert is protown. First use of "to be honest" is p much always protown.
Put THAT in your secret tell pipe and smoke it.
I will freely admit, I'm having a hard time generating reads right now, probably due to the nature of the playerlist. I'd say something sappy and mostly full of shit like "I just love you all too much to lynch," but that's entirely untrue. I like lynching you motherfuckers.
The biggest thing I'm getting is thatI don't like Flameaxe's "I agree with CTD" post. I think CTD is stretching a little bit, and flat agreement makes me groan.
That, and I'm seeing nothing butVintage Protown Fritzler. Dude needs doc protected like every night from here until eternity. Oh, andinHim looks protown, too. I like the "we have good info if CTD is scum" post.
GODDAMN, YOU ARE ONE PROTOWN SONOFABEEYTOCH.inHimshallibe wrote:@Flameaxe: Eh, I think you have good points against UT as UT continued to poorly defend himself. I'm still not sold on your initial attack, though, andfeel you could be scum that lucked out with poor responses, becauseI think UT is town that got frustrated when he was misnterpreted.
---
WithEcto's line of reasoning, I can follow him and can see the merits from his perspective.Ythill's attack on him ispro-town in execution and probably even on principle, but he's not stepping into Ecto's gameview; Ecto's "Wiki 101" criticism was harsh, but not necessarily unfounded.I am not in favor of a starkwagon.
Fritzleris returning to good form. :coo:
:glorksignal:
I like Ythill's posting... namely, his town/null/scum categorization. I don't agree with all of it, but I like that he put it out there. I don't like his interaction with CTD, though, as I also have been fine withCTD's level of scumhunting.
I'm not feeling the UT wagon.I would like to see more pressure on Ecto, especially in light of MBL's post(*cringe*).
Unvote, Vote: Ecto
AaaaandUT's vote onFritzleris :badposting:. OMGUS to the max.
EDIT: AndFritzpointed this out.
EDITEDIT: AndinHimpointed outFritz's pointing this out.
All things considered, I'mon the fence re: UT.
I likeMBL's questioning of Ecto.
Fritz,CES, andinHimare looking solidly protown.
Vote stays onEctofor now, but I would probably be willing to coax a claim out ofUT.
* Glork liked that inHim was cutting UT(CDB slack) and attacking Flameaxe (but Glork also said UT's Fritz vote was terrible)
* Glork encouraged MBL to go after Ecto (but lauded inHim's defense of Ecto)
* Glork gave townie points toYos, inHim, Mert(jokingly), Fritzler, Ythill, CTD, MBL,CES
Why did Glork vote Ecto despite finding Flameaxe's post the worst thing he'd seen?
Did Glork really clear 8 townies in one post, or is CES scum?
What did Flameaxe find "weird gut"?
Subsequent comments from Glork:
and this was Glork's next comment on Flameaxe/Porochaz,Glork wrote:As far as not feeling the UT wagon, it is extremely lazy. A bit more lazy than I'd expect from this group of players, once we got out of the random bullshit stage. I have some minor misgivings about UT's behavior since garnering some pressure (in particular, I think CTD's "UT has clammed up" comment is right on the money), but it's not enough to convince me that he needs dead. If a UT lynch goes through and he flips town, I'd expect the wagon to be chock full of scums -- most likely two in the {Flameaxe, chamber, Mert} block, with a possible token pile-on at the end of the wagon.Glork wrote:Porochaz is a better kill than CES. CES is pretty easy to figure out once you make him post (and I'm still leaning slightly protown on him anyway).Glork wrote:Yos is guaranteed scum. Porochaz is only decently likely to be scum.
Ugh, I don't really see what Flameaxe saw as "weird gut" about Glork. Glork didn't talk about possible scumpartners Ether, Gurgi or chamber at all, so it's unlikely Flameaxe was referring to the absence of two of them from the post. Glork defended CES as obvTown, put CDB(UT) in his middle category but shirked the wagon, and listed Flameaxe as most sketchy but didn't vote him, and didn't comment on him for another month. If Flameaxe is Glork's scumpartner, the best I can come up with is that Flameaxe was commenting on Glork's approach towards scumpartner UT as weird? Weird gut could also come from seeing scumpartner CES in the obvTown category. Or it could be sloppy, overreactive distancing in response to Glork's weak Flameaxe attack.Glork wrote:CDB and Porochaz are still decent scum candidates
Or, Flameaxe was town and just has a really good gut and likely nailed 2-3 scum in his initial read ("CES, UT(CDB), HackerHuck and his scumpartner Glork").
I'm tempted to conclude his gut's not THAT good, and that he's probably scum with Glork and got a little freaked at the weak bus and overreacted, calling out Glork as a town "weird gut" read. (That was Flameaxe's only invocation of "gut" in this game besides an "odd vibes" about inHim.)dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
CDB said two posts were tl;dr for him and kept him from reading on. Let's take a look:ChannelDelibird, Dec 14 wrote:DGB's analysis is tl;dr for me. tl;dr is also the main reason why I keep putting off serious rereads.
Here's the relevant part of CTD's "tl;dr":ChannelDelibird, Dec 23 wrote:I got stuck at page 41 when CTD posted a huge tl;dr.Wading back in now.
And here are snippets of DGB's 's "tl;dr":CrashTextDummie wrote:I'm getting annoyed with people who treat suspicion of CDB as just "lurkerhunting" (Lord Gurgi, I'm looking at you). Reasons to suspect CDB:
UT reacted badly to getting accused (this is the whole joke/no joke business, which in the context of his posts isnotnull or even town), tried to substantiate his bandwagon vote on me by retroactively outfitting it with terrible reasoning, didzeroscumhunting, clammed up ultra-tightly once he came under pressure, came back with a weak, lazy vote and ultimately selectively replaced out of the game. His predecessor CDB has contributed a pretty insubstantial initial analysis and his vote to the Mert-wagon andnothing elsein the 2+ weeks he's been here. Scumhunting effort = zero. Even if for some reason you don't find any of this the least bit suspicious, I can't believe you are completely okay with letting him slide like this. Lord knows most wagons that have been actively pursued in this game so far have been worse than your typical lurker wagon.DrippingGoofball wrote:SCUMPUTER 2.1.1
193 CES
150 Glork
130 chamber
110 UT/CDB
100 Flameaxe/PoroDrippingGoofball wrote:NOTE: Finally, Fabio found his cojones. Given that Glork looked opportunistic before, and CES already pinged, I'm disappointed with your InHim vote.
NOTE: Glork & CES are pining again. The Inhim vote is even more worrisome.
NOTE: Here, Glork pings your scumdar, so ONCE AGAIN your InHim vote is a bee in my bonnet.
NOTE: ONCE AGAIN, CES pings the scumdar. You're picking up CES all over the place. And Glork. On both of these points, we agree. I'm worried about you, Ythill. I need some intense re-assuring to peg you as town. Wanna revise your analysis perhaps? Were you tired when you made it?[/b]DrippingGoofball wrote:Also, I'd like to see some rich, dark, chocolatey scum hunting from Glork. He's scoring high on the scumputer, I expect more from him.
UT/CDB player slot is nearly confirmed scum by the shameless lurking and wagoning, at this point. Post #858 is seven different kinds of bad.DrippingGoofball wrote:Glorky!
We need to prioritize.
We've got CES-scum to kill.
Also, Mr. UT/CDB, the token lurkerscum.
And Shanba has got to die.DrippingGoofball wrote:Glork has 7 days to deliver that rich, dark, chocolatey analysis. If he fails, he will need to die.
But CES needs to die real bad.DrippingGoofball wrote:
Being scum leaves him speechless.chamber wrote:@CDBI see you active elsewhere on the site, get your ass in here.
Finally, DGB comments on CDB's "tl;dr" excuses:
Also relevant in that stretch:DrippingGoofball wrote:ChannelDelibird wrote:DGB's analysis is tl;dr for me.Cliff Notes:
You're scum and CES is your buddy.chamber wrote:Why aren't more people voting CDB? This is like textbook CDB scum.DrippingGoofball wrote:
Thank you! I think so, too.inHimshallibe wrote:CES defying DGB's bandwagon analysis feels like insulted scum.
(Huck's suspect list is: stark, chamber, Glork, Shanba, Gurgi)Lord Gurgi wrote:I don't see the Shanba lynch. CES lynch seems like a meta lynch. I don't see him as less likely to do what he has as town.
chamber wrote:@CDBI see you active elsewhere on the site, get your ass in here.Lord Gurgi wrote:Read page 10, HH, stark is just town. There's a particular way he acts when he's scum in terms of his niceness, but this is town niceness. I don't really have a terribly good way to explain it. It's not the authenticity, he's just a nice guy, but there's something about the way that he's congenial about scumhunting that is town.CrashTextDummie wrote:I'll give you the cliffnotes:
CDB is still scum.
Porochaz's entry into the game was underwhelming, but the case against him is probably not strong enough to maintain my vote.
Glork remains highly suspect.
Disliked chamber's refusal to hammer Mert.
(chamber posts that 5 people have suspected inHim today, 5 CDB, 4.5 Yos, 4 Shanba, 3 CES, 2.5 Glork, etc. and recommends that people wagon.)Ythill wrote:VOTE: CES seems appropriate.chamber wrote:mafia = cdb, yos, inhim, shanbaEther wrote:I'm intrigued by Glork's Shanbavote even though I don't want to sheep on him on principle because he's a bum.Patrick wrote:Porochaz (1) -- CrashTextDummie
Yosarian2 (2) -- Cogito Ergo Sum, Shanba
inHimshallibe (3) -- Lord Gurgi, chamber, ChannelDelibird
chamber (1) -- Yosarian2
Cogito Ergo Sum (2) -- DrippingGoofball, Ythill
Ythill (1) -- Porochaz
Shanba (1) -- Glork
Ether (1) -- HackerHuckGlork wrote:Ether!!
Shanba is definitely scum. You should definitely sheep me. He definitely needs lynched today.
Don't think just gogogo!Ether wrote:vote: ShanbaCogito Ergo Sum wrote:Unvote, vote: ShanbaLord Gurgi wrote:The Shanba wagon is based exclusively on him saying he didn't find value in Mertwagon analysis. That's... not much to lynch Shabs.
MBL is town and was the only one to point out anything I found even remotely convincing Re: Ectowagon. He's said a lot of very protown things and not much that's scummy in any real capacity. Generally he will say things that are just sensible and does not single-mindedly push his own agenda. Strikes me that he actually reconsiders his lynch choices fairly regularly. Also his avatar is nice.
CTD hasn't done that much since having a crap wagon on him earlier in the day. He's not done anything exceptionally town, mind you. But he's better than Glork and CES who aren't scum either. I just don't think he's scum because of how the wagon folded out.chamber wrote:Vote:ShanbaHackerHuck wrote:I forgot tounvote: Etherandvote: Shanbain my last post.Ether wrote:I don't think Shanba's stance on the Mertwagon is suspicious, though I'd have to actually read the damn thing to know if I agreed. (I am still voting him.)Ether wrote:Tentativeunvote.
That all sounds reasonable. How come you've gotten yourself caught up in a fight with Yosarian? (This is not a fight I want to restart. Attacker-defender spats are hella boring to read.)chamber wrote:Guys, CES hasn't done anything thats actually scummy this game. I think there are 3 people that are alive that I would say that about. Terrible wagon.CrashTextDummie wrote:First order of business:
I strongly dislike the building Shanba-wagon. It feels scum-fueled to me.Glork wrote:CTD, please stop being terrible at this game.DrippingGoofball wrote:Dammit. We all want this. We can kill CES later.
VOTE: ChannelDelibirdEther wrote:I will probably endorse the CDB hate. He's V/LA, though.Glork wrote:
Pretty sure you mean Shanba, not CES.DrippingGoofball wrote:Dammit. We all want this. We can kill CES later.
VOTE: ChannelDelibird
Unvote
Vote: ChannelDelibird
Wagon go go go go go.chamber wrote:Unvote
Vote: ChannelDelibird
About damn time.Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:Unvote, vote: Channel, I have faith in chamber and my Shanbavote didn't seem to draw any reactions. Boo.Porochaz wrote:Im really open to a Shanba vote.
Other news, I havent seen the reason to vote CDB beyond a lurker vote. Ill reread him but as I dont see the point now, I think this will be a wagon Ill miss.chamber wrote:I think gurgi not being under my name was actually a transcription error, he got put under CDB instead, which he later pointed out he shouldn't have been. I was trying to figure out where I messed up.Ether wrote:I am aware of the CDB wagon. I continue to think it would be fine if he were actuallyhere, but is a waste of time as it stands. Hmm hmm.MrBuddyLee wrote:@DGB: How's Glork doing so far, five days later? Right now his vote's on CDB, a lurker he doesn't think is scum based on a meta:Glork wrote:I would also prefer a Shanba lynch over a UT/CDB lynch, because (and this may sound stupid because of its metagaming nature) I think UT would have stayed around and kept superlurking if he were scum, rather than replacing out. Shanba fits the bill of Lurkerscum much more than UT/CDB.Glork wrote:
Again, you're using outdated information here. Shanba's defense of the nonexistent CDB-wagon (literally, there wasn't a single vote on CDB, and Shanba was blasting the lurkerhunt nature of the "wagon") is an extremely strong connection. Either Shanba is trying to earn superduperbrowniepoints by going "see, ITY he wasn't scum" when CDB does die, or he's trying to make sure that the wagon doesn't actually build (at least, not before CDB has a chance to actually participate in the game).MBL wrote:@DGB: How's Glork doing so far, five days later? Right now his vote's on CDB, a lurker he doesn't think is scum based on a meta:Glork wrote:I would still strongly prefer a Shanbalynch over a CDBlynch, though.DrippingGoofball wrote:Again, UT/CDB is the perfect storm of timely bandwagoning and lurking.
VOTE: ChannelDelibirdDrippingGoofball wrote:CDB is at L-2.HackerHuck wrote:I did want to work off of this, because I think it's likely that one of the mafia was bussing at this stage.
The wagons at the time of Ecto's claim looked like:
That leaves CTD/DGB and Flameaxe/CDB as possible scumpairs.Patrick wrote:ChannelDelibird (1) -- FlameaxePatrick wrote:ChannelDelibird (6) -- Glork, chamber, Cogito Ergo Sum, Ether, DrippingGoofball, CrashTextDummieGlork wrote:I'm becoming less interested in a CDB lynch. It is more stagnant than the push against Shanba was. That said, he makes a reasonable vig/investigation target.Glork wrote:One of {Yos/Shanba} needs to be lynched today. The other needs to be vigged. There is no in-between, and I probably won't be moving my vote off of these two players.
That's enough for now.Glork wrote:I *might* be willing to go back to CDB. It really depends on what he does when he finally gets around to posting.tl;dr summary for CDB:
* Ether hopped off the Shanba wagon with cause before CTD called it "scum-fueled"
* chamber and Gurgi seemed to show genuine interest in figuring out who scum were and what each others' suspicions were
* Glork really wanted Shanba lynched over CDB and found a billion bad excuses to do it
* Glork, Ether, CES, chamber were the first four on Shanba. Pretty unlikely that's the scumteam, but who knows.
* chamber made efforts on multiple fronts (votecount summary, meta callout, lurking callout) to draw attention to CDB
My conclusions:
CDB is most likely scum. If he isn't, scum really mastered setting him up here, without knowing that Glork would fall before CDB.
Ether, chamber and Gurgi look like they were making real efforts to figure shit out.
CES, CDB and Porochaz were not.dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
So what you're saying is that you were confident CES had a role, even though he had posted that he was vanilla. So you killed off Shanba. Correct?
I'm not going to answer any further questions from you unless you pledge to answer my questions in return. (1) Go into detail on why you were confident CES had a role. (2) Explain your case on me. Pledge to answer both of those and I'll take a look at the scintillating debate on p.102.dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
Is this what you're talking about on page 102?
(Because I told you where to find my most recent games, and I answered you about Gurgi, so that can't be it. If it is, clarify your further questions.)Ether wrote:Link me to your last scum game and your last two town games? Let's try to berationalabout this, MBL.
So what is the deal with you and town reads? What do you think of Gurgi?
or is it this:
(You're asking why I didn't delve into your self-meta weeks earlier when you posted it? Because the world doesn't revolve around you, and your meta was largely useless, because it was primarily about posting quantity. You claimed to be town because you rambled about game-irrelevant crap for much of D2? If you were scum you wouldn't have rambled? I actually wasted a fraction of my life reading some of your previous games, and I didn't really see it. You posted less irrelevant crap in those games, and were more to the point with your accusations and cases. As scum AND as town. As far as I'm concerned, you're totally off meta in this game and I'd like to know why. If you clarify your meta, I can give you a more detailed answer on this question.)Ether wrote:Here's a secret, MBL. I'm voting you. You're free to think what you want about my alignment (as if you're actually thinking), but if I gave a shit, I'd stop beating around the bush and just reiterate why I'm town. I don't care that you're asking me now; I want to know why you didn't do it weeks ago.
or
0) I hope you're scum because that would mean you've played well and fooled just about everyone. If you're town, my personal opinion, which means squat, is that you didn't contribute much and in fact were distractive from town's goals.MrBuddyLee wrote:I hope you're scum.Ether wrote:Could you articulate why? You keep calling my reads off the rail, but the only one you seem to actually dispute at all is your own. You've never statedwhy, exactly, you think it's unreasonable to draw the conclusions I did.
1) Pretty much everyone in this game has at one point or another realized I'm obvious or near-obvious town. Including some of the scum, who've found it expedient to treat me with kid gloves. CES, Poro, Gurgi, Glork, CDB, CTD, Huck, Shanba, Ythill. Probably others. Glork backed off me because he realized it was suicide to fight that wave any longer than he did.
2) Your "read" of Glork was obtuse. There's no other way to describe it. Either you're scum, or you abandoned rationality and reasonable doubt to stick to a terrible read for weeks, without particularly pursuing further information to question/clarify your beliefs.
3) You came into this game and stated you had a suppressed desire to lynch me based on factors outside this game.
4) You've never posted a case on me, or anything resembling a case, yet you've voted me above your top two suspects.
5) You don't seem to have read relevant parts of the game at all. You certainly haven't commented on them. You haven't made a SINGLE remark about my interactions with Glork and how they do/don't make me more likely or less likely to be scum. It's stunning, frankly.
So what I'm interested in knowing is why your "read" is so drastically different from people who have played the entire game. I want to know WHY you think I'm scum. That's how the game is played. You post WHY you think I'm scum, and we assess. You post WHY you thought CES was roled, and we assess. You have been slippery as an eel this game, and despite a few minor town tells from you (Shanba, for example), you really, really smell like scum.
Your turn.dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
@Zorblag, with the current votes, all we really know is that the following scumteams are unlikely:
* Gurgi, MBL, CES
* Gurgi, MBL, Zorblag
* Gurgi, MBL, Ether
* Ether, MBL, CES
* Ether, MBL, Zorblag
* Gurgi, Ether, CES
* Gurgi, Ether, Zorblag
and to a lesser extent we've eliminated: (tougher to get 3 scum coordinated to quicklynch?)
* Ether, MBL, Porochaz
* Gurgi, MBL, Porochaz
* Gurgi, Ether, Porochaz
CDB, xxx, yyy could obviously still be the scumteam.
Zorblag, CES, Porochaz (all voting or being voted) could still be the scumteam.
Other possibilities:
Zorblag, CES, Ether
Zorblag, CES, Gurgi
Gurgi, CES, Ether
Gurgi, CES, Porochaz
Gurgi, Zorblag, Porochaz
CES, Ether, Porochaz
Ether, Zorblag, Porochaz
MBL, CES, Zorblag
MBL, CES, Porochazdialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
Ether did not respond.MrBuddyLee, Dec 21 wrote:Ether, what do you think of inHim, Shanba and Yos?
Ether did not respond.MrBuddyLee, Dec 29 wrote:Ether, need some original thought from you on inHim, not sheeping.
Ether responded with this:MrBuddyLee, Jan 11 wrote:
Details, please.Ether wrote:An MBL lynch is a compromise I am willing to make.Ether wrote:Ythill thinks you're scum because he thinks you're scum with Glork. I think Glork is probably an insane cop, and got an innocent on you because you're scum.
Ether responded:MBL, Jan 11 wrote:So you have no play-based reasons for wanting me lynched, Ether?Ether wrote:Something like that. My plan was always to put you off until I could see a few interactions and shit; Ythill's stance on Glork forced my hand there.
Ether responded:MBL, Jan 11 wrote:you've stated flatly that Huck is scum while giving absolutely no evidence to support it. So please elaborate upon why you feel he's scum.Ether wrote:I think he's scummy for reasons other people have already given (even if I was thinking them first). He flew way too far under the radar for my comfort on Days 1 and 2, and is still coasting on his list without actually looking for or making the slightest effort to get scum lynched.
Ether's response:MBL, Jan 16 wrote:Wait, Ether. You suspect CDB less because you think his wagon that you were on (and you were the last person to get OFF of) was sketchy? Going to need some explanation from you re: why the CDB wagon(s) have been suspect.Ether wrote:I didn't actually check who was on it; I was running from memory. But, um, yeah, I do think CES and chamber are both pretty likely to be scum.MBL wrote:You're really not answering the question, Ether. What specifically about that CDB wagon you were on looks sketchy to you?Ether wrote:You're going to answer me first.MBL wrote:Why are you pretending to suspect me when I'm the investigated innocent of the cop you are confident is town?Ether wrote:I'm frustrated.MBL, Jan 19 wrote:Ether, I just read your entire post history and I believe you've given two reasons why Glork is town:
1) Because he sucks this game too much to be scum.
2) Just because.
I would like some more specifics from you, please.Ether wrote:At this point my position is less that Glork is a shining beacon of towniness and more that we don't lynch the uncounterclaimed cop. I'm sick of Glork--as a player, as a human being, as a topic of discussion, as some fucking lurker I need to defend--and it's kind of been wearing down my resolve. He's literally haunted my dreams, you know.MrBuddyLee, Jan 24 wrote:
Ether, why is CES town based on the last two deaths?Ether wrote:Based on the death (again), CES is town (again).Ether wrote:unvote; vote: MrBuddyLee
For the first bit, not the question. (I think CES would have killed Crash instead of Ythill.)MrBuddyLee wrote:Why?Ether wrote:On second thoughts, I don't want to give my full answer yet. Sorry--feel free to call me on this later.MrBuddyLee wrote:You said you picked up a bit from your previous games with Glork, so please share. What did you learn from your previous games with Glork in which you accurately read him as scum?Ether wrote:I picked up that Glork could go either way when he's competent, but when he sucks, he's probably town? I was wrong, MBL, and the one time I read him correctly as scum, the game mechanics basically forced him not to bus. I think he probably did a more flexible form of that here--intentionally setting up innocents on his scumbuddies one by one and hoping to make it to LyLo that way.MrBuddyLee, Jan 31 wrote:Ether, did you read D1? Do you really think Glork was trying to bus me all day?
Also, can you please be clear about why you believe CDB isn't a good lynch today? Is it just that I'm on him, or is it more that you don't like the CDB wagons?Ether wrote:while I have read the full game, I barely remember any of it. (For example, I only remember the fact that Glork was attacking you based on Ythill's conspiracy theory from Day 3, right before Glork claimed cop. For what it's worth, I don't think said theory is likely at all.) I probably should go back over the early parts of the game for other reasons: not necessarily for your sake.
I think you brought up a fair point on the CDBwagon the last time you drew it to my attention, and it's still perfectly fair. I dunno. There are active reasons why I dislike Huck and Porochaz, while CDB is just absent.MBL wrote:You seem to have gone from "Porochaz is obvscum" to "Huck is obvscum and he's voting Porochaz so Poro might not be scum". What gives?Ether wrote:When I was trying to lynch Porochaz yesterday, I believed Huck had an innocent result from a confirmed sane cop.
Ether did not answer.MBL wrote:Ether, why did you hop off Huck and stay off all day?
Ether did not respond.MBL wrote:Please make your case, Ether. Explicitly. I have been very patient with your nonsense, but I'd like to hear your FULL case. That's how the game is played. All day yesterday you spouted "Huck + MBL" "Huck + MBL" with a side dose of Porochaz. Huck is dead. You were wrong.
Ether did not respond, but mentioned this:MBL wrote:Also, Ether, from all accounts you appear to heavily suspect Porochaz. Please explain your case on Porochaz.Ether wrote:I'm still in a position where I...kind of think Porochaz is town
Ether did not respond.MBL wrote:Please explain how it was better to no-lynch quickly than to have Shanba give us his full suspicions. Even if Shanba had claimed/softclaimed vanilla, how would that have affected the day/night's events negatively?
Ether has not answered.MBL wrote:Please post WHY you thought CES was roled.
I have so many problems with your play after reading all this over again.
* You dodged two questions about inHim D2
* You didn't give any play-based reasons for suspecting me (only your GlorkInsaneCop debacle)
* You claimed to be waiting to judge me based on interactions, but you haven't looked at or commented on any of my interactions with ANYONE.
* You defended Glork blindly without analyzing his play other than to say "he sucks this game"--how did you know he sucked before he died?
* You switched from Porochaz to Huck after the Glork lynch, for no good reason other than that Huck no longer had an innocent on him.
* You stayed off the Huck wagon all day, only hammering with some weird reasoning about "Poro and Huck not being scum together"
* Jan 16, you said the CDB wagon you were on in December was "sketchy" and thus you thought CDB was town
* You said CES was likely scum on Jan 16 but you are currently claiming you have thought for some time that he was roled town and that's why you killed Shanba fast.
* You held back answers regarding why you thought CES was town to start D4
* You recently said Porochaz is town and that you won't vote CDB, which makes it look like you don't have three scum suspects.
And possibly the biggest one:
* You seem oddly confident for someone who's been wrong over and over.
If I'm wrong, big whoop. I'm posting all this because I think your play has been sketchy, and if by some miracle scum finish me off tonight, this info's important to have front and center. If you're town, you're fully capable of defending yourself.dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
Ok, Gurgi and Ether, we find ourselves somewhat on the same team right now. We face two choices:
1) vote CDB
2) the scumteam is CES+Zorblag+Porochaz and we need to all vote Porochaz alongside CDB.
One and only one of those two propositions is correct. One is guaranteed to be correct. The three of us need to decide which and act in the next 24 hours or so.
I was hoping to wait a bit and see if CDB reacted to the current situation, but frankly, we don't have the time.
I am interested to see your thought on the current vote situation, and your thoughts on the likelihood of CES+Zorblag+Porochaz. I'm about to reread the entire game right now from that perspective to see if it makes consistent sense. Whether or not you have time to do that, please post your thoughts on which is the better of our two choices right now.dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
It's possible that Prozac and CDB are scum together.Lord Gurgi wrote:So what if we lynch Prozac and he turns up scum, but you're wrong about the team?
Also who's your team with CDB?
But the utterly fabulous thing right now is that we can guarantee that at least one is. And possibly both.
My instinct is CES-Prozac-CDB, with Zorblag/Ether possibly subbing in for one. Ordinarily, I'd be hesitant to give scum info on my suspects so they can decide who to nightkill and who to leave around, but my suspicions are fairly fluid right now. We have two lurkers who haven't given us a lot, CES who has gone for low hanging fruit and minimal verbiage all game, and Ether, who has played the prototypical scum game and the only arguments against are 1) most dead town have found her townish and 2) scum wouldn't dare risk playing THAT wrong. My Gurgitown read is more tone-based than anything, and if it comes down to a final three with you in it, I hope whoever's left definitely takes the time to read your play critically to see how it matches up with the rest of caught scum.
I only made it 10 pages before heading to brunch, but if CES-Zorblag-Porochaz is the scumteam, CES and chamber buddied early, which would be odd.chamber wrote:Fuck alliances. (unless its me and CES).chamber wrote:Hey ces, can we vote ythill or yos instead of ctd?dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
The correct scumteam is one of these:
CDB-Gurgi-Porochaz
CDB-Ether-Porochaz
CDB-CES-Porochaz
CDB-Zorblag-Porochaz
CDB-Gurgi-Ether
CDB-Gurgi-CES
CDB-Gurgi-Zorblag
CDB-Ether-CES
CDB-Ether-Zorblag
CDB-CES-Zorblag
Zorblag-CES-Porochaz
Any other scumteam could have quicklynched by now for victory.
So either Zorblag-CES-Porochaz is the scumteam, trying to goad one town into voting CDB,
or CDB is scum.
Chamber wanted:Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:
You're just a buzzkill.Yosarian2 wrote:that kind of very early game budding/alliance forming like he was doing with ces in that vote is cool in scumchat games, but seems at least somewhat scummy this early in a forum game.
when UT was L-3.chamber wrote:More UT votes!!
Glork specifically protected UT, even though he still finds UT suspicious:
Untrod Tripod (7) -- CrashTextDummie,Flameaxe,chamber, Mert,Cogito Ergo Sum, Fritzler,Glork
If scumteam is chamber, Glork, CES, Flameaxe, note that ALL FOUR were on the UT wagon, which would explain why Glork hopped off. Because he wouldn't want the entire scumteam to get caught on a mislynch.Glork wrote:I'm not feeling the UT wagon. I would like to see more pressure on Ecto, especially in light of MBL's post (*cringe*).
Unvote, Vote: Ectodialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
chamber oddly posted:
C0mr4ad3 (11:45:57 PM): Chamber, go make a post in our game
blargerer (11:47:13 PM): prod me in thread not out, if I'm reading I'll get the message.
C0mr4ad3 (11:49:11 PM): Well, I just posted, and I don't want to doublepost
which is a really odd thing to post if they're scum together. 1) possible modkill of scumpartner 2) possible drawing of association between scumpartners
Strongly tempted to eliminate the CDB-Ether-Zorblag scumteam from our remaining possibilities.dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
Gurgi, Zorblag's voted. We have to choose now between CDB and Porochaz, or try to do some quick persuading about an alternate candidate. With Ether not around, our options may be limited.
Heh, I think the research may have finally paid off.ChannelDelibird wrote:
I got stuck at page 41 when CTD posted a huge tl;dr. Wading back in now.Shanba wrote:
How much have you read?ChannelDelibird wrote:So the problem I'm having at the moment is that you guys are posting faster than I can catch up. I requested replacement in a couple of games yesterday for the purpose of making sure I can stick with this one. I promised Patrick I wouldn't flake and so I am determined not to.
The wagon on me appears to be receding so I feel like claiming now would be a bit counter-productive (and I don't see any reason why it would affect DGB's view of me anyway). If I am wrong and more than, say, the four people still voting for me want me to, then I will.
In the bolded part of the quoted post above, CDB appears to be concerned with the possibility of being vigged by DGB.
But if CDB only checked votecounts and stopped reading at page 41, how did he know that DGB was the "vig"? Crash's "tl;dr" post was Dec 16th 6:55pm. DGB's first major vig hint was two days later:
DrippingGoofball Dec 18th 1:53pm wrote:@ MBL
Shall I vig Glork?
Hypothesis 1: CDB's scumteam filled him in behind the scenes (quicktopic) about DGB being a possible vigDrippingGoofball wrote:Or, I could vig CES.
Hypothesis 2: CDB lied about not staying current with the game and is scum
Hypothesis 3: CDB lied about not staying current with the game and is terrible towndialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
Ok, here's the case for Glork-CES-chamber/Zorblag-Porochaz being the scumteam.
* They NEVER voted each other D1, other than CES's random vote stage vote on Glork
* They NEVER voted each other D2
* Glork made a point of calling out his meta--a chronic buser--but he never bused a scumpartner until CES right before lynch.
* They were on lots of wagons together:Glork wrote:DGB: Why wouldn't I want to bus hard? I have a long and storied history of busing hard, which I'd be more than glad to show you if you want. Heck, the one thing I don't do is stick my neck out for my scumbuddies when they've got a noose around their neck. Meta completely, 100% disagrees with what you're insinuating here.
Nov 19: CrashTextDummie (6) -- Fritzler, Shanba, Untrod Tripod,Cogito Ergo Sum, IH,chamber
Nov 23: Untrod Tripod (7) -- CrashTextDummie,Flameaxe, chamber, Mert,Cogito Ergo Sum, Fritzler,Glork
* Nov 24, Glork hopped off the CDB wagon "still on the fence about CDB" possibly because ALL FOUR SCUM were on the wagon (note, Glork only got on CDB because he was skimming the game and Fritzler told him to get on CDB the previous day)
Dec 4: Ectomancer (8) -- stark, MrBuddyLee,Glork, Cogito Ergo Sum, Mert, Fritzler, Yosarian2, DrippingGoofball
Dec 16: Shanba (5) --Glork, Ether,Cogito Ergo Sum, chamber, HackerHuck
Dec 17: ChannelDelibird (4) -- DrippingGoofball,Glork, chamber, Cogito Ergo Sum
Dec 23: Yosarian2 (7) -- Shanba, MrBuddyLee, Ythill,Glork, CrashTextDummie,chamber, Cogito Ergo Sum(poro on Ythill)
Jan 3: inHimshallibe (7) -- ChannelDelibird, Lord Gurgi,Cogito Ergo Sum, chamber, HackerHuck, Yosarian2,Porochaz
Jan 10: Shanba (2) --Glork, Cogito Ergo Sum
*Jan 10, Glork claims cop and is counterclaimed. Plan changes:
Jan 11-Jan 16:
Glork(3) -- Ythill, CrashTextDummie,Cogito Ergo Sum
Glork(3) -- CrashTextDummie, ChannelDelibird,Porochaz
Glork(3) -- CrashTextDummie, ChannelDelibird,Porochaz
Glork(4) -- CrashTextDummie, ChannelDelibird,Porochaz, Cogito Ergo Sum
Cogito Ergo Sum (1) -- Glork
* CES, Prozac jumped on and off Glork while Huck, Ether, Gurgi, MBL wavered
Right before Glorklynch:
Porochaz(5) -- Shanba, Ether, Ythill, HackerHuck,chamber
*Hypothesis: scumteam temporarily abandoned no-busing behavior to deal with Glorkwagon
Day 4:
HackerHuck (5) --Cogito Ergo Sum, ChannelDelibird, Lord Gurgi, Shanba,Zorblag
Porochazdid not place a vote all D4
CES was his #1 suspect after Glork D3
But he weakened his stance and never placed a vote D4 despite finding Huck null:Porochaz wrote:
I voted Glork over CES purely because the claim I don't feel is believable and things change like the claim therefore I have to adhust my vote accordingly.HackerHuck wrote: I'm up for a Porochaz lynch now. Looking back at his scum-hunting, it seems that he had made his decisions prior to actually using that point system (much like he accused DGB of doing). If you take away Ythill due to the claim, his top suspect CES had a -10 and Glork was at a -7. Gurgi and I were null reads (-4.5, -5) and DGB was town at a -1. I'm not sure where the line was drawn, but it looks like it was fitted to his suspect list.
* Repeat, Poro did not vote anyone all day D4Porochaz wrote:
H.H. - same opinion as my summary of him in my rereadEther wrote:Porochaz, what do you think of HackerHuck, CDB, CES, Gurgi and chamber?
CDB - Chronic Lurker, same as me, pretty much, except from my point of view, I think that Im being more accessable than him. Looking at the game more as a whole, he seems to have made a load of excuses
CES- I didnt like CES in my reread, I havent really noticed him since. Im going to look through his posts at a later date
Gurgi - Flying very much under the radar
Chamber- Not much of an opinion, need to iso him as well
D5
No Lynch (5) --Cogito Ergo Sum, Lord Gurgi,Porochaz, Ether,Zorblag
D6
ChannelDelibird (3) --Cogito Ergo Sum, Zorblag, Porochaz
=========================================================================
Caveats:
1) CDB was on a few of those bad wagons, and was the target of a few of those wagons and could have been busing
2) CDB also bused Glork quickly without much hesitation
3) CDB appears to have lied about whether or not he read the game past page 41--he knew about DGB's vig claim that happened a few pages later
4) The "scum decided not to bus" theory is just that--a theory. We have to decide whether that makes more sense or if "CDB is scum and was occasionally bused" makes more sense.
Still thinking. I am not yet ready to vote CDB, as so much evidence fits if Glork-CES-Chamber-Poro are the scumteam. However, if we don't discuss/vote soon, we are in imminent danger of nolynch. Need thoughts from everyone, including thoughts from Zorblag/CES/Poro on why they DON'T fit as a sucmteam.dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
Note, CDB and Porochaz can still potentially be scumpartners, but the thing that matters right now is figuring out whether the reason CDB is not dead yet is because:
1) He's town, CES-Zorblag-Poro are scum, and only town are still deliberating
or
2) CDB is scum and 1-3 town are still thinking it over
We either lynch Porochaz or CDB. One or both have to be scum. Gurgi and Ether, which is more likely?dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
chamber, Nov 17 wrote:Fuck alliances. (unless its me and CES).chamber, Nov 19 wrote:Hey ces, can we vote ythill or yos instead of ctd?chamber, Dec 16 wrote:Guys, CES hasn't done anything thats actually scummy this game. I think there are 3 people that are alive that I would say that about. Terrible wagon.chamber, Dec 23 wrote:
CES is on V/LADrippingGoofball wrote:CES hasn't done anything significant in a while, he's lurking in plain sight.
He should speak out now, he might not be here tomorrow morning.
And never mentioned CES after that.chamber wrote:DGB: CES isn't happening, push for someone that might actually die.
Actually, if you're wrong, the game's over.Zorblag wrote:I think at this point I like ChannelDelibird best as a scum candidate. If I'm wrong about that then Cogito Ergo Sum probably goes up some on my list
Possible coaching:Zorblag wrote:@MrBuddyLee, my feeling that ChannelDelibird and Cogito Ergo Sum aren't partners was based on gut reaction to how they were interacting when I was doing my readthroughs.
Reasons for voting CDB:Porochaz wrote:
I see what you mean Zorb, I held off because I wanted to chat with Ether a bit more. Especially as she is my top suspect at the moment. At the very least I want her to answer MBL's case. However she can still answer either way.Zorblag wrote:@Porochaz, is there any particular reason that you're not voting for ChannelDelibird at this point if you think that he's likely scum? It seems that of your three suspects he's the one that's likely to get lynched today (and, as I've argued, if he's town the scum team really almost has to be Cogito Ergo Sum, you and I at this point.) That he's left a vote on you for as long as he has and town hasn't lost the game should be all the convincing that you need that he's scum assuming that you're town.vote CDBPorochaz wrote:Havent I stated my opinion on CDB before? I find him scummy, because I dont think he's even trying anymore. He's accepted the inevitable and is waiting for his lynch rather than try and change peoples minds...Zorblag wrote:Yeah, that's an argument that fails to convince me.
VOTE: ChannelDelibird
If that loses the game I suppose I'm sorry on principle, but only barely given the way we're limping along right now.
Not super convincing. But neither is the proposition that CDB is town.Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:
Huh. I guess I assumed that had come up at some point previous. The answer is pretty boring anyway: lurking (in the case of Porochaz), gut (mostly Channel on this one), process of elimination, Glrok protecting Channel. I think my suspicion of HH blinded me to Channelscum a bit previously, because Channel proposing HH-Prozac-me looked like a losing proposition.MrBuddyLee wrote:
You have? I just read back through December 17th and couldn't find a hint of a case you've made against either. Please indulge me by emptyquoting your old cases/arguments for those two being scum.Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:MrBuddyLee wrote:Who do you want lynched and why?Channel/Prozac. I've already said why.
I just read that stretch of your posts again. You never made any kind of case on either or stated any facts in support of your belief that they're scum. Not one.
This time, you're not wagoning. Please make your cases, or point us to the previous cases you claim you've made on those two.
Paging Gurgi and Ether to a white courtesy phone.dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
Note, if Flameaxe is scum with chamber-Glork-CES, he nails two of the three in this post--he technically calls Glork town but says there's something nonspecifically "weird" about him. And he gives a null on chamber.
If he is scum with CES-Glork-CDB, same thing--he actually nailed all THREE scum.Flameaxe wrote:1) Yosarian2
-Not getting any huge scummy vibes here. Trying to figure out all this chamber-hate, maybe I'm not seeing something. Could you give me an in your own words explanation for why he's scum?
-Leaning town
2) Mert
- I agree with your opinions on the CTD wagon, pretty much agree with everything mert says about the UT situation too. Not much else to really get to.
-Leaning town.
3) IH
- HI IH. Nothing really to get a solid read here. Or anything close to solid for that matter. Glad you have computer access again, hopefully we'll hear more from you soon.
-No read
4) Shanba
-Shanba's recent lack of sleep posts feel very protown to me. Can't really think of anything else meaningful to say here.
-Leaning Town
5) Flameaxe
-Really needs to start participating and posting more in this game.
6) CrashTextDummie
-Nothing bad jumps out at me here. Nothing super jumps out at me either.
-Null read.
7) Glork
-I like some parts, indifferent about others here. His catchup post seems fine on paper, but I'm getting a weird gut read about it. Can't really explain it. I'm going to try to work on finding words to explain it. I'm liking his posts since then without any weird gut feelings.
-Leaning town 'weird gut' read?
8) Cogito Ergo Sum
- Yarr. Again, not a ton to go off of. Not a huge fan of his wagon jumping, considering most of it has nothing else to go with it from what I can see. Also noting that CES has been on three (what I consider to be) major wagons in CTD, UT, and now Ecto (ecto's jump did have some opinion with it).
-Leaning slightly scum.
9) Lord Gurgi
- Not really getting any strong read on Flimsy either. If anything, I like some of his points throughout the game.
-Slightly town
10) Untrod Tripod
- Nothing has changed from the reasons I voted him in the first place. Not liking how he plays off a vote (that in my mind) came off as a serious vote as a joke vote. Not liking his essential vanishing from the thread after that point up until a few hours ago.
- Still Feeling scum.
11) Ythill
- Without going into terrible details for time reasons, some parts of my read gave me town vibes, but my read started shuffling back down as the thread went on. Mainly the whole ShanbaSlip business that rubs me the wrong way. I'm really not seeing it and it feels like grasping at straws a bit. However, I don't really see a reason for him to grasp either way. So...Yeah.
- Null I guess, could go either way.
12) Fritzler
- Again, not much to go off of. Has...sort of been around, but hasn't really given a whole lot content-wise other than his UT push.
- Null
13) HackerHuck
- Ythill vote is a stretch, in my opinion. I see his point, I guess, and it sort of makes sense, but that doesn't make it any less of a stretch.
-Leaning Slightly scum
14) Ectomancer
- Feels very much like frustrated town to me. Never been a big fan of the whole "no vote, no town read" style that almost seems to be the case at points. A lot of the points against Ecto seem contrived to me as well. The response to said points gives me said frustrated town read.
-Town
15) stark
- First off, hi! Didn't say that earlier for some reason. Seems to be actively trying to get information out of everyone, in a seemingly protown way. Can't find anything bad to pick out from his iso.
-Town
16) inHimshallibe
- Odd vibes from the whole Vote CTD, vote mert, CTD wagon diffused chain of events in iso 6-7. In regards to my last post, you point out what I pointed out in my last post in iso 10. I'll put that here to look back on too.
- Kind of a null read.
17) chamber
- I honestly cannot come up with a read here. I'm going to come back to this one at an earlier hour...
18) MrBuddyLee
- His questioning of Ecto seems protown-ish. Is there anyone besides Ecto on your scumdar? Just wondering.
-Slightly town.
If he's scum with Ether/Gurgi and one of CDB/CES/chamber, he mixed it up.
If he's town, he amazingly managed to call Glork weird, and two of Glork's potential scumpartners (and three of the four most likely) scum. CDB, CES, chamber.
aargh
If he's town, and Glork + Gurgi/Ether + CES/chamber + CDB is the scumteam, his reads are still significantly better than average.
Is Flameaxe that good at mafia? Or did he have inside info?dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
Jesus, Ether. Gurgi's invisible. We barely have time to process this.
You're going to have to make a gut call. CDB or Poro. Hopefully Gurgi is listening in and will weigh in as well. I doubt BOTH of you are scum. If either of you feels CDB strongly, hammer him. Otherwise, consider the Glork-chamber/Zorb-CES-Flameaxe/Porochaz combo and please at least comment.dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ