In post 6, Magister Ludi wrote:I need to know if either Regfan or Fate have detailed flavor knowledge in this game.
Vote: Minimum
Their entire role PM is posted for you to read.
VOTE: Magister Ludi
In post 6, Magister Ludi wrote:I need to know if either Regfan or Fate have detailed flavor knowledge in this game.
Vote: Minimum
In post 27, Shmugen wrote:Disclaimer: There will be an immediate FoS on anyone who I deem too incendiary. Heaps of rage = heated argument and whining = lack of fun and potential modkills due to post quantity.
In post 33, Shmugen wrote:In post 28, AGar wrote:In post 27, Shmugen wrote:Disclaimer: There will be an immediate FoS on anyone who I deem too incendiary. Heaps of rage = heated argument and whining = lack of fun and potential modkills due to post quantity.
Did you look at the playerlist before you deemed this to be a good idea?
Yes. Even the most ragey of players should theoretically be able to rein it in for a day or two, however long this lasts. This new attempt by moderators to impact pacing is one I enjoy. This method of enforcement is strong, but I'm a science guy in real life, I appreciate forceful brevity.
Come thee at me, bros.
Post Count: 2
In post 35, Magister Ludi wrote:erm.... so what? I wasn't asking for their flavor knowledge of their pm, but rather of the arabat book/this game in general. What I want to know, exactly, is who the probable scum team is from an informed flavor standpoint, and who the good guys are.
In post 103, sword_of_omens wrote:i didn't see where MOI mentioned that he would prefer a policy lynch on all 3 or that he doesn't like all 3? Unless it's common knowledge that i'm not aware of?
In post 110, Shmugen wrote:The stakes are too low for Magna to be making that up. One of the three is scum? Where's the scum motivations in that kind of shenanigan. If he's scum and we believe him wholeheartedly (aint gonna happen), we'd lynch 3 town and then one scum. More likely we'd lynch one, one would get vigged if such a role exists, and if none flipped scum we'd kill Magna. It seems possible that Commexo could be among the 3, but things are usually against the SK anyway, I doubt a renowned mod like Hito would do such a thing. Magna is not always the most fun to play with, but this gambit is too high risk low reward for scum to pull off.
I'm torn on Shinori. Am I really just thinking he's too new and would pull those sorts of extreme reactions? Some of you have townreads on the slot, why so?
5
In post 136, MagnaofIllusion wrote:And certainly there’s no possible reason for people to seek out that information …
In post 168, Shinori wrote:Frankly I don't see why your vote is still on magister Ludi and it seems like you are just spouting random nonsense here.
In post 173, MagnaofIllusion wrote:No-one has said that scum don't have fake-claims (because the Mods specifically said they did) or suggested that somehow scum would be lynch via rolename claims alone. That you are resting your whole stance on a premise that no-one has argued or thinks is scummy.
I also appreciate the lesson on voting. I am voting someone I think is scum. So I think I've got a handle on it.
In post 182, Shmugen wrote:Agar, you've got to read a little better. MoI isn't pushing any kind of agenda, as scum or for policy. He already made clear multiple times that he had no reason to not come forward with his info, so he did, and that's that. Anyone in their right mind would lynch someone scummy D1 over taking a blind shot. Your concept of ML scum is also based on dildos, as, like many have said, we all know the scum have fakeclaims. Pushing someone on knowledge of fakeclaims is pushing someone on how closely they read the rules, which isn't scummy.
2? 3? The kid don't always remember where he's been.
In post 204, MagnaofIllusion wrote:
Agar wrote:What happened to your "1-of-3" deal you abandoned oh so quickly when a wagon sprung up, eh?
Nothing happened to it. The information is out there. I appreciate your rather scummy effort to somehow paint me voting a scummy player outside that group as abandoning it. The information is public and isn’t going away. There are at a minimum 3 other scum outside that group (and realistically it probably is 5). Why again shouldn’t I vote for one of them who is obv?
Do you want to come out and directly say I'm scum? You've skirted the issue enough (saying you think I'm faking and the above sideways swipe).
In post 222, MagnaofIllusion wrote:AGar wrote: Actually I'm just trying to confirm my suspicion that you're just pulling a retarded gambit, like I said when I first read your post.
Then you are wasting time and energy trying to prove your personal ego point valid when it is doomed to fail. It’s not a gambit and frankly the amount of energy you are expending proving ‘points’ that aren’t scum-hunting (your ML point where you completely misread his post and then continued as if he wasn’t making sense when he did) is why my vote is where it is right now.
In post 249, OnceAndForEver wrote:UNVOTE: VOTE: Hindu
Nah if I'm not getting a gaurunteed 1/3 scumkill today I'm going back to my original plan, this guy needs rope.
In post 320, Minimum wrote:
Agar wrote:Llamarble looks way worse to me, everything about his posting just screams scum trying to just cause confusion instead of trying to actually do anything productive.
What does that even mean? How is that an actual scumtell, and how exactly does someone go about "trying to cause confusion instead of trying to do anything productive"?
In post 334, Minimum wrote:It would benefit the scum but that really is almost entirely theoretical. Scum don't randomly decide to try and cause confusion and 'marblescum certainly wouldn't.
In post 335, Flash wrote:In post 327, AGar wrote:but a player like Llamarble
What games have you read or been in with llamarble?
(I'm trying to see this CES, I really am).
In post 413, MagnaofIllusion wrote:So I wonder how long Bella is just going to avoid this thread since?
Now that Regfan is willing to go to bat with me I think this is warranted -
VOTE: Bella
In post 441, MagnaofIllusion wrote:So are you scum who knows Bella is Day and one of the others is your partner and are playing the White-Knight game or are you scum with Bella hoping to defuse the possibility of a growing wagon? Since my read on her is scum I'm thinking the second.
In post 455, MagnaofIllusion wrote:AGar wrote:Also for fuck's sake, get your own personal grudges out of the game. You've struck up personal attacks on players rather than attacking their play - if you're town which I unfortunately think you are, fucking cut the bullshit and actually get back to playing the game. It's not entertaining when you try and be Cyberbob in a game, it's really fucking annoying.
But that’s not the truth and you know it. My suspicions of Bella came 100% from her reaction to my play, her complete lack of actual scum-hunting, and her play not reflecting her beliefs.
I believe she’s using ‘outrage’ as a mask for not scum-hunting. She basically just admitted that she knows she isn’t voting scum but is happy to idle her vote there. Look at her ISO. See how many cases of actual suspicions you can find. In her response about you she even shied away from calling you scum just that you were ‘less Town’ than someone else which is basically fence-sitting. She isn’t looking to lynch scum. She’s looking to survive.
In post 485, Llamarble wrote:Meh, there isn't a clear winner in Bella Peta Chesskid land. Yet. I do think it'll help to get more posting from those slots either from present occupants or replacements.
Also whoever said the commexo could lay in that group, that is pretty unreasonable since unless Commexo role is pretty weird that would leave it extremely unlikely to win.
Staeg UT Agar Hindu and a 1 of 3 (Chesskid or maybe Bella) sounds good for Night. Commexo is for PRs to find.
I still have lots and lots of reading to do though; Staeg / UT are on that list because they look poor on initial examination and trustworthy people want them dead.
Does anybody agree with me that Hindu = scum?
VOTE: Hinduragi
In post 493, Staeg wrote:MoI - I buddy Fate when I feel like the situation calls for it. Fate actually mislynched me on these grounds as scum before. I didn't react to Fate's suspicion because every single time he's done this before he came around to me being town for saying something seemingly random.
In post 523, Nachomamma8 wrote:Did you miss MoI's claim?
Also, what could we gain from your lynch? Because I'm listening.
In post 583, Tierce wrote:Hai. Haven't read, and going out in a bit. First priority will be parsing Llamarble for hider breadcrumbs, see if he didn't hide behind OAFE or Nacho.
In post 657, Hinduragi wrote:We aren't a step ahead because we just lost 3 fucking townies in a single Night. That's devastating compared to a single scum flip.
In post 663, MagnaofIllusion wrote:This quite frankly is terrible. You aren’t a newbie … you very well know that specifically hunting for a Serial Killer when 4 Night players remain is correlated with being Night. I’m going to have to decide if you would be so brazen as scum to do so …
In post 675, MagnaofIllusion wrote:AGar wrote: But you're right, we should wait until the combination of Night+Commexo absolutely ravages our numbers before we actually start to look for Commexo. Figure this: We're going to lose something akin to 2 a night while both factions remain. You guys want to say "Hey, let's look for Night! Fuck Commexo, they can wait!" That's great, but what do you do when you don't hit Night and the two kills demolish our numbers? Then what?
Are you intentionally trying to straw-man? No-one has suggested we absolutely ignore scummy players because they might be Commexo. What people have suggested is that focusing on lynching Commexo (and I’ll get to this later in my response) when enough scummy players exist to put to the screws.
MoI wrote:
AGar wrote:Why ignore something that seems pretty fairly straightforward right now and instead go on a wild goose chase. Tell me, oh wise ones, what leads you all have off of Staeg's flip, since that's the only real reason I can see anyone saying "Oh well we're going to completely ignore Commexo and go for Night." - because you have strong association/interaction based reads off of Staeg's lynch.
Post 615 finds me getting several good Town reads and several scum reads (Chess and yourself) from Staeg’s ISO. Funny that you seem to ignore that post exists.
MoI wrote:
AGar wrote: Commexo isn't going to look for Night, and vice versa - they both help each other in big ways right now. As long as they avoid cross-fire, their relationship over the first few days is going to be fairly mutual in trying to keep each other from being found. At most, Commexo might try and snipe a few Night so he or she doesn't wind up in a situation where town is already done and now Night just has to find the SK.
Your ‘Scum are never going to cross-kill’ stance is rather bad since it assumes full knowledge by both sides of who the other is which is pretty ludicrous. Cross-kills happen all the time when players who are deemed to be Townie are killed and flip scum. It also assumes we have no Protective or preventative roles that can help keep the Day bodycount low.
Remind me again what your case for Shin being Comexxo is? Becauase what you posted in Post 650 doesn’t even come close to being what I would call a compelling push.
In post 722, MagnaofIllusion wrote:So as hypo-Town you are going to ignore the other three reads simply because you are scummy?
And this basically side-steps your original point that reads can be made from Staeg’s ISO when you called them ‘wild goose chases’.
In post 737, MattP wrote:I'm not at ALL in panic mode so you absolutely suck at reading tone
I read your interaction with moi as town and after reading the setup it confirmed he wasn't HK. Therefore I believe his claim which means Peta or Bella is scum and I have a strong town read on peta.
In post 752, MattP wrote:Your vote reasoning sucks complete ass Bella
In post 802, Regfan wrote:Give me a legitimate reason why Bella is a bad lynch (Or why you think she's town if that's the case) because "She's barely active" really doesn't sell me against her lynch at all, it actually incentives it. Read through her ISO, she hasn't stated a single scum-read other than Matt and that scum read is mostly due to him being 1ofthe3 other than her. I mean seriously take a look at her and tell me you think she's a bad lynch again. Also I don't understand how you can be as frustrated as you are right now with us shutting down lynches when we shut down the OAFE one, the Llama one you pushed who was town and us shutting down the lynch on you.
In post 955, Minimum wrote:In post 953, AGar wrote:Didn't the first Abarat Mafia have a pairing of "informed" roles where one knew one was town and the other knew one was scum?
Yes and this matters how?
Tierce wrote:AGar, how much flavor knowledge do you have?
In post 1281, Flash wrote:Tammy is probably non mafia and minimum is town. /prod dodge
In post 1287, Minimum wrote:AGar, you keep repeating that you want MattP to hammer Quilford. Thoughts on Tammy? Do you agree with Seraphim's and 4nxi3ty's assessments of her play? Your reads have been fairly static today.
In post 1325, MagnaofIllusion wrote:@AGar – have you looked at where and how KarenWalker / Quilford end up on wagons in comparison to the flipped scum in your read on that slot as Night?
In post 1354, Tammy wrote:
Hey Agar...why do you have two and only two suspects when there are three scum out there?
In post 1388, Minimum wrote:3) if AGar blocked Llamarble, that means he didn't hide behind anyone! Why were there three deaths on N1?
In post 1391, MagnaofIllusion wrote:@AGar- have you asked hito what would happen if you matched both names?