/Invitational 13: The battle of Yarmouk. Decisive victory!
-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
Two things. First, the exclamation mark in "There's an important difference!" sounds like it's trying hard to be light-hearted. And in the first post, he writes "Die. Scum. Die." all on different lines. Seems like some serious thought has gone into that formatting, and that's more likely from scum trying to write a jovial post, rather than town who would be more likely to just dash it off.
And no sarcasm, you're currently my top town read.-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
Fishy puns are hilarious and original.
@chamber: well, which is it here? Are panzer's reasons bad, is his post off, or is there something else?
@kitty: what's wrong with panzer's post? To me, it really doesn't exude effort like DRK's.
At some point I'm going to accidentally vote for the wrong kitty here, so it's essential we get rid of one before LYLO.-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
In post 26, DeathRowKitty wrote:Do my posts really "exude effort"? Jeez.
The exclamation mark was certainly a conscious choice - a conscious choice to mess with mykonian. Putting "Die. Scum. Die." on 3 lines was hardly more of a conscious choice than putting a period at the end of your average declarative sentence. My first post says what it means to say in the way it means to say it. That's all.
Yeah, the exclamation mark mod-messing explanation I'm certainly happy with. Other one seems like something that would require a very concious choice, but there's nothing left to say on it.
Dislike mith's 29, it's stretchy as hell. DRK's reply to me is answering a joke (though that may be stretching the term) about Kittys with a joke about usernames and Panzer's reasons. His vote for Kitty couldn't matter less, since noone is really advocating "lynch a kitty". His deadline lynch questions are slightly unusual, but why scummy? Acknowledging you have confirmation bias is a wonderful thing, but I struggle to believe mith has it this early on, on this sort of wagon. Doesn't feel real.
UNVOTE: DRK
VOTE: mith
@Katsuki: any thoughts that can't be expressed in vote form?
@myk:do you require/prefer unvotes?-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
On the deadline lynch: ok. I can see where you are coming from. I disagree - I think it's a rather tired scumtell that probably never worked well - but it's not a particularly scummy point to make.
How about the confirmation bias? Do you really think you are suffering from that in any significant way on page 2? That is totally alien to me - and I, like you, think that making early game cases as serious as possible is useful and fun.-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
@Kitty: It makes me self-concious about my interactions with the player, and then I over-analyse what I should say (actually, this applies to all scum-scum links with alive players whose alignment I don't know). For example, I nearly changed my last post substantially because I was accused of distancing - I'm aware that it fits with distancing. It also gives me weird motivations to want mith not to be scum, because if he is I'm more likely to get lynched tomorrow. All in all, this hinders my scumhunting and stilts my interactions with the player I'm linked to - although probably not too much at all here, it being a really early and presumably weak link.
To be clear, none of that is saying that drawing links between alive players is wrong, or invalid scumhunting (though I do tend to think it's pretty useless before any flips). Just that I hate it.-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
I'm not ready for this day to end.
UNVOTE: panzer
VOTE: mith
I was going to vote Kat in a pressure-the-lurker kind of way, but this post gives me a decently strong gut townread:
In post 61, Katsuki wrote:I'm quite satisfied with how this day has gone. I have other reads that lead to me to believe that panzer will most likely flip scum.
Just not really seeing that from scum.
People in the game:
- Panzer: hasn't done anything. His vote pretty directly contradicts the only opinion he's put out there, which is bad. Leaning scum.
- chamber: is being chamber. I can't read him at this stage.
- Rhinox: one substantial post, which makes a lot of sense. Leaning town, though I'm a sucker for people who call me town.
- mith: I don't really get the feeling mith's scumhunting here. He's saying a lot, but not really pressing on anything. He's qualified himself a few times (by bringing up confirmation bias, by weakening his read on KK), and sort-of-retracted some points in a way which emphasises that they were sensible in the first place (in response to me on DRK and DRK on DRK). Leaning scum.
- KK: decent posting. Hasn't done a great deal yet.
- Kat: as above, one post gives me a town read, otherwise a bit lurkery. Would like to hear her reasons for wanting panzer dead.
- Kitty: I dislike 62. It asks for no hammer while subtly saying "but quickhammers aren't too bad, so if anyone does hammer, that's ok". Feels like Kitty wants an early lynch, but doesn't want to be caught actually endorsing one. Leaning scum, though probably not with panzer.
- DRK: pretty happy with his posting. Leaning town.
@DRK: re: 55; I would like an explanation as to where your gut read on KK comes from.-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
I meant this:
"KK: I like your posting so far, but I wouldn't go so far as to say I have a "strong" read on you - I don't believe I've played with you before, for one thing."
The bit after the dash weakens the read, and seems unnecessary - it's not really a big factor whether or not you've played with someone, and so it feels like an excuse not to commit.-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
@Kitty: then why say that "I feel like a quickhammer isn't nearly as detrimental as it would be under normal circumstances"? I get not unvoting to keep the pressure up, but if you are nervous about a quickhammer, why say anything that makes one more likely?
Still liking Kat here.
@KK: wait, so in post 46 you were saying you were ready to hammer despite it being page 2? I'm confused - I don't see how that fits with your next sentence. "But panzerjager needs to explain himself." sounds very much like you aren't going to hammer him.-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
In post 108, Fishythefish wrote:Nowayis scumChamber pulling this off. No scumbag says "the scum clearly have daytalk" - they'reneverconfident enough that they know what town would think.
I made this post while my brain was not in it's default state. I basically agree with the premise, but probably wouldn't have worded it quite so strongly myself.
@Rhinox: huh. As scum, I'm always terrified my extra information is shining through, so when I speculate about something the scum know and I don't have to it's a pretty massive towntell. Do you not find the same thing?-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
In post 130, Rhinox wrote:In post 115, Fishythefish wrote:@Rhinox: huh. As scum, I'm always terrified my extra information is shining through, so when I speculate about something the scum know and I don't have to it's a pretty massive towntell. Do you not find the same thing?
Not really. In my experience, scum are pretty good at faking town slips like not being aware of daytalk. Last time I was scum it was actually a primary goal of mine to try to fake towntells or do something to make town say "scum would never do that." Very rarely do scum actually slip inside information. I've seen more town players lynched for scumslips than actual scum. As for me specifically, no I'm not usually worried about my inside information being transparent when I'm scum. The rest of my scum play is transparent enough
Well, it turns out not everyone is me. On reflection, that was probably guessable. I'll downgrade my townread on chamber accordingly.
I'll make a real post a bit later, when I've summoned up the energy to think.-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
@panzer:
1) Why did you originally think that mith and I looked like scum together? Even if it was just a hunch, can you explain it a bit?
2) Why were you happy voting DRK, when you thought mith and I were scum? Do you often vote randomly early on, even when you have opinions?
3) What changed your mind about me being scum?
4) Why is mith scum?
5) Anything else you want to say about anything at all? It's always good to know what people are thinking.-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
In post 139, PJ. wrote:In post 133, Fishythefish wrote:@panzer:
1) Why did you originally think that mith and I looked like scum together? Even if it was just a hunch, can you explain it a bit?
2) Why were you happy voting DRK, when you thought mith and I were scum? Do you often vote randomly early on, even when you have opinions?
3) What changed your mind about me being scum?
4) Why is mith scum?
5) Anything else you want to say about anything at all? It's always good to know what people are thinking.
1) nope
2) Fuck DRK and Yup
3) Just the way you post. Play on gut
4) cause he's scummy.
5) That Mith and DRK are possibly scum together. Katsuki can't read me. Chamber is def town
So, panzer's reads/votes strike me as making sense for scum.
- RV on DRK. Well, makes sense for anyone.
- Linking two people who'd been on DRK's wagon. If panzer was actually thinking about things, he'd be unlikely to make this link, and if he did he'd be unlikely to be happy with his DRK vote.
- Move off me. This happened when mith's wagon started building, and I continued to post a fair bit with no criticism at all. Makes sense for scum wanting to jump on mith and not have to go after someone who looks hard to go after.
- Linking DRK and mith - this throws muck at his rival wagonee and someone on his wagon. There's no real reason for it that I can see, except that DRK said mith wasn't scummy and is going after panzer.
- Chamber is def town - I think that's obvious pandering to me. I'm clearly torn between the wagons - I've been on both, only unvoted panzer because of L-1, and now I'm asking him to explain stuff. I've said that chamber is definitely town (though I've now walked that back).
UNVOTE: mith
VOTE: panzer
All panzer's done makes sense for scum. None of it is conclusive, and even all together he could be an unlucky townie whose opinions happen to coincide well with what scum would want to do (or an incompetent townie who values self-preservation to the point that he looks like a scumbag). But if he won't explain his reasons, there's no way of telling, and that just makes panzer a scummy player who is unlikely to get any easier to read.
That takes mith to L-2, panzer to L-1.-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
Feels weird not have a few days to ruminate post-flip. AFAIC panzer being town doesn't tell us too. If anything, mith is slightly more likely town - because he went from 0 to L-1 while panzer's wagon stagnated, and if scummith were in danger you would think scum would be more likely to give the panzerwagon a little shove.
Why KK, chamber?
VOTE: Kitty
Before her ongoing LA, I don't like her posting much. 62 still gives me a bad feeling, and she just gives me a vibe of not wanting to stir anything up. There's also an element of sort-of-PoE about it; I have mild to moderate townreads on the rest of the panzer wagon, and it seems fairly probable there were 1 or 2 scum on it (more so than a random 5 player group).-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
Not complaining (and also not scum), but your analysis only means I'm unlikely to be scum with mith, right?
Yeah, looking harder at day 1 I think I agree my "panzer wagon stalled" analysis doesn't stand up to scrutiny. There just aren't many players who could have jumped on panzer if scum with mith and didn't; Rhinox had started the mith charge and mostly ruled out panzer, the kitties and chamber where already there, and Katdidswitch back (as did I, though that's not relevant to me).
Why do you think KK is town?-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
In post 145, mith wrote:Fishy: Any thoughts on chamber's continued lack of reasoning for his vote? On rereading page 1 I find it odd that you initially questioned him about this and have since let it slide.
Sorry, missed/forgot about this. chamber not giving reasons for things is annoying, but not a scumtell for him based on my (slightly hazy, but I think reliable enough) memory of his meta. When he didn't answer me, I didn't really have anything more to say on the matter, and it wasn't worthy of a vote.-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
In post 169, Rhinox wrote:Only thing that worries me about you is I think this post is now the second time you hit me with pandering/flattery, first example being here where you went from "no way is chamber scum" to "I'll downgrade my townread" just because I (and only me) didn't agree with you.
Well, that first example isn't really me changing my mind because you disagreeing with me - it's more that I just realised that something that would be a good towntell for me isn't necessarily one for everyone. The second example - someone I think is sensible and likely town disagreed with me strongly, so I revisited my opinion (which tbh I hadn't thought about hard enough first time round - I was extrapolating from larger games in a way that doesn't work).-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
I want to have an opinion on chamber/mith, but I just can't muster one up. It looks more like a clash of playstyles than something correlated with alignment.
I'm tempted to move my vote because of the lack of company, but I don't think that's a good idea. The complete lack of interest in my wagon makes me think I'm actually more likely to be on to something.
@Everyone who hasn't answered this recently: what do you think of Kitty?-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
OK. Reading people who have votes on them first:
- DRK. I'm getting a strongish town read off his posting. He makes a lot of sense, but there's something else; the posting just feels natural, like he's saying what he thinks without lots of editing. Looking at the KK case (or things KK said; not quite sure what is supposed to be a scumtell):
a) DRK was against a mith lynch, saying that the case against him was playstyle differences. Could possibly be a weak DRK-mith link, but not scummy.
b) DRK thought scum wouldn't be able to communicate/didn't know. Don't see how this is something scum would pretend.
c) Scumread on KK is "trumped up". I really don't get that from DRK's posting. I see a push on KK based mostly on his questioning of mith being a bit weird/useless.
- KK. I'm torn here. I very much agree with DRK's summary of the mith questioning here. It's perhaps mildly scummy because mith was sat at L-1, and scum might have wanted to find reasons to vote for him. But it doesn't feel to me like KK's questions are not intended to go anywhere (which is DRK's other point). Read 116 without really thinking about the content. It strikes me as a post from someone who thinks they've got a pretty neat case - not someone who's asking questions so it looks like they're doing something.
His push on DRK I find positively townish. It reads like KK is convincing himself that DRK is scum, in a way that only town can really do.
- mith. Can still easily see him being scum - he hasn't done anything that makes me think he's really looking for scum. But nothing specific I dislike.
- Kat. I see his "mith and panzer" idea as the kind of complicated conspiracy that scum don't really make up. His D1 line was "I thought panzer and mith were scum together, but mith wouldn't be lynchable until panzer was gone, so I voted for panzer until mith wagon started". I thik that's the kind of corkscrew thinking town can get themselves into, but scum don't fake.
@Kat: what did you mean by "Sigh" in post 142? When you were voting panzer, and thought mith was scum with him, why didn't you mention your scumread on mith?
- Kitty. Nothing's changed recently; her last post doesn't say much, and nothing controversial. She still has a post I don't like and has been playing it far too safe for my liking. I know she has LA and is ill, which makes me feel kind of mean, but she's my top scum read.
Other people:
- Rhinox - there's something I want to say about Rhinox, but I don't want to say it yet. Prod me for it in a few days.
- chamber - not much to say. His 175 looks honest, but it could probably be his honest thoughts about the right way to play even if he's currently scum.-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
In post 206, Katsuki wrote:In post 201, Fishythefish wrote:
@Kat: what did you mean by "Sigh" in post 142? When you were voting panzer, and thought mith was scum with him, why didn't you mention your scumread on mith?
When? Do you mean originally? I didn't express it then because I'm very weak as a town player, and while my reads are more often than not right, I'm generally unable to get my scumreads lynched. Especially in a game of this playerbase, I wanted to get panzer lynched, then be able to hammer mith lynch through D2 as there is no way I could stand toe to toe with mith D1.
tl;dr, I'd easily lose 1v1 with any scum in this game as my argumentative and language skills are very weak.
Also regarding reads, my panzer read was based off of my mith scum read + the things others were pointing out about panzers actions eg. the cheerleading on DRK. Mith was always the stronger scumread, I thought he was doing something I caught him doing in another game where he was scum.
In post 207, Katsuki wrote:Oh and the sigh was that this game is apparently not the easymode I thought it would be (aka easy mith panzer).
I'm happy with these answers. mith, what do you think of them?-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
The "complicated conspiracy" isn't just mith/panzer; it's Kat's line of reasoning that has him thinking you two are scum together, but voting panzer because panzer is the lynchable one.
Reading Kat's ISO, I see Kat switching from panzer to you when a wagon on you built. His justification was that he thought you were scum together, and that you weren't lynchable. That's just not the kind of thing I think opportunistic scum make up - why not just say you are scummy? "I was too chicken to vote for him before" is not something that's going to help lynch you, earn town points, make the switch easy,anythingscum usually want to do there.
Kat not voting panzer is a red herring; he as good as voted (expressed intent to hammer at L-1).-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
He did give that explanation yesterday - in 70 he voted you and said "Wonderful, didn't see this happening.". In 72, he explained this with "I thought we had to get through panzer first before getting this.". That's pretty clearly saying he thinks you and panzer are both scum, and wouldn't be able to lynch you. The explanation today fleshes out what was already out there.
Yep, I can see that there may be reason to stop talking about some this until Kat answers your 211. This includes something I want to say. OTOH deadline isn'tthatfar away, which is why I'm still talking.
Oh, and on coaching; if I see an attack I disagree with on somebody I'm leaning town on, I'm often going to counter it and/or ask questions to get them to say the right thing (the latter was most of the reason I asked Kat questions in 201 - I was nearly sure I knew what he was going to say on the important one). Particularly if I think there's a good chance they are going to make a hash of it for reasons which have nothing to do with alignment.-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
So, here's why you should all vote for Kitty:
1. We're drifting towards a mislynch
Currently, the town is split. Noone has more than 2 votes, and we're only a couple of days out from deadline. With that being the case, and there being a large proportion of scum in the game, we're not going to lynch scum. People are going to move their votes around to get a least bad lynch. Some of these people will be town, but one or two will be scum. They probably won't end up voting for scum, and we'll have a mislynch. It will look random and messy, and it will be hard or impossible to tell who the scum were.
2. We need a town led lynch
Right now, the best thing we can do is try to be sure that scum aren't controlling the lynch. One way to do this is randomness, but that's no fun and nobody would agree to it anyway. The other way is for a townie to convince other people who is scum; clearly, we've failed at this. The final solution is simple; you pick someone to follow.
3. I'm the person to lead the lynch
To get a town led lynch in this situation the town has to trust someone, and I'm the obvious person. Nobody thinks I'm scummy. Several people think I'm town. I think those of you who know me respect the way I play the game.
4. To sweeten the deal, Kitty is probably scum...
Before she had LA, she really looked like someone avoiding attention and conflict. Her 62 smells like scum trying to egg on an early lynch without looking bad for doing so. And if Rhinox is town (which seems likely) we've got a wagon sitting there with two respected townies who post a lot. Why aren't the scum all over it? Because they don't like lynching scum.
5. ...butdoesn't matterif she's not your top scumread
I'm not asking you to agree with me that Kitty is the mostly likely scumbag in the game - I'm just asking you to vote for her. The point is that if you are right in your suspicion of Kat/DRK/KK/whoever, you aren't going to get the lynch - the scum aren't going to let you. If you are wrong, you might well get the lynch. By far our best chance of avoiding this trap is rallying to this town-led wagon.
So, if you think I'm likely town come and join Kitty wagon. I can't promise you she's scum, though I think the odds are good. I can promise that the scum aren't controlling our lynch, and if you don't join me they definitely are.-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
My posts were affected by the time problem on the server - my last two posts were before KK or mith voted. I've also been unable to post since then (because the forum thinks my last post was in the future, so it won't let me post).
@mith: my post is a bit dramatic, but I think it's pretty much true and needs saying to try to get a lynch without a last minute scramble scum are controlling.-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
@Kat: a rough town to scum list for me goes:
DRK
Rhinox
Kat
KK
chamber
mith
Kitty
I think there's a good chance that there are 2 scum in the bottom 3 there. I can't say I have any massively strong scumreads; I'm mostly working through PoE, and so my scumlist consists of people who don't look particularly town and have maybe made one or two posts that rub me the wrong way.
You should come and hammer Kitty. Then when she flips scum we should lynch mith together tomorrow.-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
Huzzah!
Looking at yesterday, Rhinox massively didn't have to vote Kitty - I was getting no support, and he had other natural directions (notably mith). His fairly passive, "I'd better have a vote down and fishy looks town" vote isn't that of scum trying to get hundreds of town points for bussing.
KK's vote for Kitty is awesome. He listed her solidly in the middle of his reads a page earlier, and never said anything at any point that implies she is scum. When I made my "follow me or lose" post, he hopped straight onto the Kitty wagon. My post was a weird one you don't normally see, and the reaction to it was very unpredictable (I certainly had no idea what would happen). I would really think scum would want to see what was happening before jumping on the wagon. Particularly in KK's position; KKscum could easily have plumped for mith rather than Kitty. And again, it really doesn't look like KK is trying to look town by bussing; he does nothing to push the lynch except the important bit with the voting.
I'd peg mith as by far the mostly likely busser. He voted Kitty last, and arguably by then she looked in some trouble. However, even mith looks reasonably good here - he committed to Kitty over the other viable non-mith wagon (KK) much earlier in day 2.
So. I think the wagon is pretty full of townie goodness. I'd guess it's at worst 3-1 town-scum, with a solid chance of being all town. I'm not looking to lynch on it today.
Kat looks pretty bad with the flip. He never commented on Kitty after his random vote, including when I asked for everyone's opinions and when I urged him personally to hammer (though to be fair he didn't post at all after that). chamber and DRK both pushed the KK counterwagon, which scum obviously had an interest in doing. On other things, my gut is still telling me DRK is town, and I still think Kat's day 1 panzer-mith thing is unlikely from scum, but I could be wrong on either.
All in all, it's a
VOTE: chamber.
He's the only player I have no reason at all to think is town. He was on the wrong wagon yesterday. Could well be scum.
Some questions for people:
@DRK: what do you feel about KK's vote on Kitty yesterday? Is it a likely play from scum?
@Kat: did you see my post 260 yesterday?
@chamber: in 263, you said you felt exactly one of DRK and KK were scum. Why not neither? (Yeah, I know you've already decided not to answer that. But I need an answer to get a better read on you, and if I don't get a better read on you I want you dead.)-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
@DRK: How was the mith-wagon a no-go? That sounds more like the words of someone who wants to say KK is scum than someone who is looking at the game. Here was the votecount:
In post 200, mykonian wrote:Initially, Vahan's plan seemed succesful. Both Muslim wings were pushed back by the unstoppable Roman legions, but were not broken. Could they push back in time to protect their pinned down center?
votecount
Kublai Kahn (2): chamber, deathrowkitty
mith (2): KittyMo, katsuki
KittyMo (2): Fishythefish, Rhinox
Katsuki (1): mith
DeathRowKitty (1): Kublai Kahn
not voting (0):
KK had previously pushed a mith wagon D1, and listed mith (just) above Kitty in a scumlist day 2. On the more general climate, there was no serious pro-mith feeling around.
Granted, there was no obvious route to a mith lynch. But the same was true of anybody else in the game. You make it sound like the day had come down to KK vs Kitty, and that's not close to the truth.
@chamber: ok, just seemed an odd way to put things. Why did you think each of them was scum? From your posting, I *think* you agree with Rhinox that DRK's case was overblown rhetorically, but I'm not sure why you thought KK was scum.-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
In post 282, DeathRowKitty wrote:Chamber had mentioned not finding mith scummy, I never showed much interest in voting mith, mith obviously wasn't voting mith. That leaves just you and Rhinox that could possibly push through a mith wagon and you were both on the KittyMo otherwagon.
You could essentially have made this post about any of the three wagons:
"Fishy and Rhinox had mentioned not finding KK scummy, KK obviously wasn't voting KK. That just leaves KittyMo and katsuki that could possibly push through a KK wagon and they were both on the KittyMo otherwagon."
"chamber had mentioned finding Kitty town, Katsuki never showed much interest in voting KittyMo, Kitty obviously wasn't voting Kitty. That just leaves DRK and mith who could possibly push through a Kitty wagon, and they were both on other wagons."
The top 3 wagons (KK, mith, Kitty) all had 2 voters, a person or two who was not at all interested, and a few people who didn't have strong feelingse. Sure, chamber, you, Rhinox and I all preferred other wagons, but in a deadline scramble, or just after things changed, any of us might well have switched to mith. I don't see how you can look at the state of play at post 200 and say that mith was never going to get lynched; I think at that stage every vote one way or another was really important.-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
In post 289, DeathRowKitty wrote:The KK and KittyMo wagons both had people that could realistically have made the jump. At most, the mith wagon could have gotten Rhinox. You'd just made a big deal about how we needed to settle on a wagon and that that wagon was KittyMo and no one else could reasonably have been expected to go for it.
In the case of KK, both KittyMo and Katsuki were wild cards - neither of them had been around to have given an opinion on the wagon and either or both could plausibly have joined. mith voted KittyMo over KK but seemed likely to go for KK if KittyMo and Katsuki lynches weren't possible.
In the case of KittyMo, there was the possibility of Katuki and mith, one of which did materialize.
Unless KK was going to out-of-nowhere try to get you to convert to mith after you'd just made a big point of KittyMo being the best deadline lynch, the mith wagon was simply not a possibility.
Two things about this exchange:
1. This argument makes me feel DRK is town. The beginning of today was an excellent opportunity for scumDRK to walk back his scumread on KK - it's now unpopular, and there's a good reason to change your mind (the Kitty flip). The fact that DRK isn't doing that, and is arguing against my KK-is-town point, seems to be totally unmotivated for a scumbag.
2. On the substance - if KK votes mith we might well get near deadline looking like this:
mith: KittyMo, katsuki, Kublai Khan
KittyMo: Fishythefish, Rhinox, mith
Kublai Khan: chamber, deathrowkitty
What's going to happen? If KK is scum, Kitty's not likely to be moving. You're fixed on KK, and I've just made a great big speech, so I'm going to be ranting on about KK. The reasonably likely moves would be:
Rhinox -> mith
Kat -> either
mith -> KK
chamber -> mith
Looks to me like any of the wagons could collapse. If it came down to two wagons, here's the best guess for mith vs Kitty:
mith: KittyMo, katsuki, Kublai Khan, chamber
KittyMo: Fishythefish, Rhinox, mith
with DRK unguessable. If it came down to mith vs KK:
mith: KittyMo, katsuki, Kublai Khan, fishy, Rhinox
KK: chamber, DRK, mith
So. I think the day could easily have ended up in a 3-way messy impasse, or with any 2 of the three wagons fighting it out. In either of the matchups, mith looks pretty likely to be lynched. All in all, KK voting mith would definitely have made a mith lynch a real possibility.-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
In post 293, mith wrote:Pretty much in agreement with Fishy's argument on KK. He could have voted for me, and instead voted for scum. The only significant scenario I can see him doing that in is if he's scum with Katsuki and didn't want to have all three scum on my wagon.
Yeah, this makes sense - if Kat is scum KK becomes pretty likely again.-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
In post 314, Katsuki wrote:Sorry I owe this game much more than what I've been able to provide thus far.
Skimmed this page, chamber why that question?
Also it's D3 already. Why no awesomeness yet?
My substance is that mith is scum. Not much I know but it's something~
Why is mith scum? How have your views on the game been altered by the scumflip?-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
In post 320, mith wrote:On one hand, I'm kinda glad this game is going so slowly, because my week has been rough and I don't know if I would have the energy to catch up on a more active game. On the other hand, this game is dragging horribly, shame on us.
Katsuki lynch is looking really unlikely right now. I may feel really stupid about this later, but my gut read on chamber today is town. So, counter-wagons, ho!
UNVOTE: Katsuki
VOTE: DeathRowKitty
Eh. I get the town chamber read, but if chamber is scum his one and only priority today is looking town, and I reckon he's good enough scum to give these sorts of town vibes.
Waiting for Kat to respond to 316. Could see myself voting Kat today, won't be voting DRK (or anyone else who isn't chamber).-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
In post 324, DeathRowKitty wrote:Fishy, if chamber is scum, what's your opinion on mith's voting record today? I have an answer in mind, but I'm not going to give it yet for bias reasons
Well, obviously if chamber is scum then mith is campaigning against a scum lynch today. But that doesn't seem an obvious scum play to me - if there was ever a time for bussing, this is it. The way things are going, it's pretty unlikely chamber is making it until endgame (4 left, say), and pretty likely that mith is. Scum-mith would rather get behind a chamber lynch, so long as he thought that was the best way to get townpoints.
So. I don't think scum-mith would particularly feel the need to protect scum-chamber; he'd probably just be trying to look town. As for town-mith, I can easily believe he'd be voting like this; a gut town read on chamber's recent play is completely plausible.-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
Boo.
VOTE: Katsuki
Kat cruised through Day 3, not doing anything because neither he nor his scumpartner was the number 1 lynch choice. He provided no content until I called him on it (and, to be fair, his exams ended). Then he made odd little prods at mith, and asked about townreads on him. Unlike anyone else in the game, as far as you can tell from the thread he hasn't evennoticedthat we lynched scum. This guy is not playing like a townie.
We're lynching Kat today. I'm not moving my vote. Spare yourselves two weeks of us not really doing anything and vote him with me now.-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England