Mini 1429 - Hunt in the Dungeon - Game Over
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar
-
-
Slandaar
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 46, Revenus wrote:
Additionally, you seem to assume to know what I think about russianov, based off of my RVS vote.
Well I asked you; what do you think then?-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 50, Revenus wrote:Why exactly is it so important that I comment on russianov when you haven't done so yourself?
I did.
In post 51, Revenus wrote:Like, out of all the players in the game, you single me out because I didn't comment on something I didn't think was worth commenting on.
Something you obviously feel is important in determining how "bad" I am at this game.
Something you haven't talked about at all, other than wanting me to comment on it.
Like, did my RVS vote scare you that much? It was a joke, but now I'm fine keeping it on your disingenuous ass.
lol What?
VOTE: Rev
He is scum pretty obvious.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 51, Revenus wrote:
Something you obviously feel is important in determining how "bad" I am at this game.
Make it more obvious; where does this come from? (I caught him in one post)-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 61, Revenus wrote:
A. I'm bad because I voted for someone non-seriously whenI Had an opportunity to vote seriously
I never said bad but Right
In post 61, Revenus wrote:
Throughout this whole exchange (up until your most recent post), you have had the "opportunity to vote seriously" but haven't.
OK
So, you are random voting, why are you doing this? to try to make things happen, this is the point of the random votes, but you random voted when you can easily have posted more meaningful content which better furthers the cause intended by a random vote.
I just didn't vote but posted content. There is no comparison I was contributing to that goal; you were not.
In post 61, Revenus wrote:
Again though; aside from Twitch, no one else has even talked about Russianov besides the two quick votes on him, which you did not address, nor have you addressed Russianov at all; how is it that little old Revenus should be talking about this situation when you haven't even talked about it?
I did.
You even quoted it.
Lets think about it shall we?
You say I am scum, You vote me, You say I think you are bad.
How can I in said scenario?
I can't; your read is fake you know I am town so you are scum.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 66, Mac wrote:Rev raises a good point about Slandaar's argument against him: seems very weak and hypocritical considering he's doing the same thing
This is probably scum btw
It is horrendus parrotting on something which is clearly not right in the first place.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 36, Slandaar wrote:
He ignored the Russianov stuff completely when it is actually suspicious until you look at his posts on site; he obviously felt it isn't so why not say so?
In post 41, Revenus wrote:In post 39, Slandaar wrote:You.
I don't understand where you're getting how I feel about anyone in my first post aside from continuing your joke from your first post.
In post 51, Revenus wrote:Like, out of all the players in the game, you single me out because I didn't comment on something I didn't think was worth commenting on.
How obvious does it need to be?
I say; rev could have said the russian stuff isn't anything and explain why he thinks that
Rev say: WHAT HOW YOU KNOW WHAT I THINK???
Later Rev say: I DIDNT THINK THERE WAS ANYTHING IN IT.
The point being; it doesn't matter how I know what hes thinking when I am right.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 51, Revenus wrote:Like, out of all the players in the game, you single me out because I didn't comment on something I didn't think was worth commenting on.
Why me? Why me? Why did you focus on me???
In post 51, Revenus wrote:
Something you obviously feel is important in determining how "bad" I am at this game.
As said; this comes from the fact he knows hes caught at no point did I insinuate this.
In post 51, Revenus wrote:
Something you haven't talked about at all, other than wanting me to comment on it.
As said; I have commented on it, Rev even quoted the post earlier so hes just misrepping religiously.
In post 51, Revenus wrote:
Like, did my RVS vote scare you that much? It was a joke, but now I'm fine keeping it on your disingenuous ass.
Where did this even come from? its just nonsense
The guy is scum.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 61, Revenus wrote:
In post 36, Slandaar wrote:
He ignored the Russianov stuff completelywhen it is actually suspicious until you look at his posts on site;he obviously felt it isn't so why not say so?
nor have you addressed Russianov at all; how is it that little old Revenus should be talking about this situation when you haven't even talked about it?
Amazing. I have said what I thought about it.
Its like when I said repeatedly I did Rev thought I was lying yet didn't accuse me so.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
OK Rev English comprehension classes;
In post 61, Revenus wrote:
In post 36, Slandaar wrote:He made a terrible random vote when he could have voted seriously.
He ignored the Russianov stuff completely when it is actually suspicious until you look at his posts on site; he obviously felt it isn't so why not say so?
So, I'm not scummy at this point for you, but "bad". Already you are trying to discredit someone who is voting you, even when it's a joke.
So here I clearly say 'his vote was terrible'
Now Rev says 'not scummy I am bad'
See Rev is talking about himself, where I am talking about the vote for example;
Man Utd played terrible yesterday; you are talking about their play
Man Utd are the best team in England; you are talking about your opinion on them.
Difference is very very obvious the two are completely independent of each other.
So, Rev explain to me something;
Why do you think that I thought you were bad from the one RVS vote; do you think this is a sensible assumption to make? Does your RVS vote make you look like a bad player in your opinion?-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 88, Revenus wrote:Half of your "case" on me is from that yet your sentence construction is so poor I, and the rest of the game, was unable to tell that you were actually giving your thoughts on Russianov in that paragraph.
No half of YOUR case on ME, my case has nothing to do with you not understanding although I can see that it may be misinterpreted.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 89, Revenus wrote:
Finaly, I'm trying to understand Slandaar's case on me since he keeps saying he "caught" me. Slandaar, lay it out for me one more time, will you?
Include All those posts above yours along with your terrible RVS vote
Then let me know why you are voting me when your case doesn't exist anymore.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 55, Slandaar wrote:In post 50, Revenus wrote:Why exactly is it so important that I comment on russianov when you haven't done so yourself?
I did.
His reply post;
In post 61, Revenus wrote: you did not address, nor have you addressed Russianov at all; how is it that little old Revenus should be talking about this situation when you haven't even talked about it?
There is no cohesion to his thoughts; I say I did he just completely ignores it; either I lied or I am telling the truth but this doesn't matter to him.
also; 'little old revenus' is scummy because he is trying to act the innocent.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 61, Revenus wrote:how is it that little old Revenus
If anyone thinks this is anything but scum they are insane.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
Tunnelling is a scumtell
(its not; need more examples?)
I didn't misrep anything, quotes are needed here.
In post 111, Deltabacon wrote:
ignoring calls for reads on others and generally making a dogs dinner of Day one, given that RVS has given way to inane accusations and arguments that have gone nowhere.
That is generally what happens on Day 1.
I don't really want to post my reads at this point I like to do that later in the day. Mac is lolscum though.
He and Rev link well so there is that too.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
No that isn't active lurking.
Active lurking is when you are reading the thread but not posting and this is where the scumtell of lurking comes from unfortunately most don't use it correctly someone who doesn't post much is not necessarily lurking they might just not have time to post.
Active lurking and lurking are the same thing lurking is the shorthand version no other form of lurking exists it is just not taught to people correctly so they assume low posts=lurking.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 66, Mac wrote:Rev raises a good point about Slandaar's argument against him: seems very weak and hypocritical considering he's doing the same thing
I am just going to say what Rev said!
However, I must say even though Rev may have made a good point I am going to keep voting him!!!
In post 127, russianov wrote: and for twisting my words.
(He made an accusation of his own it doesn't matter what you think of it)
He was also 'hiding' behind what Rev said earlier...-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 143, Mac wrote:
Hey, you're a clever guy who can spot the difference apparently (see #93) - I'm sure you can see the difference between my post and russianov's. I'll give you a clue: I didn't hide behind Rev's argument and vote you, merely agreed with him about you.
OK; and he merely agreed with what 'others' had said
What is the difference again?-
-
Slandaar Survivor
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
OK lets think about this; you were saying I was being hypocritical for not voting my 'suspect'; when you yourself were not voting your 'suspect'.
And yes, you wanted to see how it developed that is the point; you wanted to see who else voted that is basically what I said; you had your vote on Rev but hedged the other way ie if others voted you could but didn't want to all in with Rev without enough town support.
Nothing Russian has done is actually scummy. Jumping on bandwagons opportunistically is one of these things people like to jump on too much.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 154, don_johnson wrote:so you think russianov is just extremely dumb?
I mean this in the nicest possible way.
Whatever his alignment is; basically yes.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 155, Mac wrote:
I have to go out now Slandaar so will answer you when I'm back, but if you think nothing is scummy by russianov can you please point out where Twitch twisted his words?
In post 133, russianov wrote:
3.
In post 31, Twitch da Woof wrote:In post 27, russianov wrote:If the wrong person gets bandwagon'd.
So you find that a person who is wrongfully bandwagon yields a net loss for town automatically.
Interesting.
Point 3 is his answer.
It isn't good, but it does make sense and I can see someone thinking it was twisted.
He didn't say it was a net loss automatically; he said if the wrong person is wagoned; think cop.
Is this what he means? well we have to assume so now because I have outed my interpretation because people seem to require it.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
The wiki is wrong; what I said is an absolutely huge scumtell and isn't covered by either so you know its wrong. Doesn't really matter though.
In post 193, Revenus wrote:
Third; right now I'd rather lynch ztife over either wagon, if no one wants to join me on Slandaar, for being the most fucking worthless player in the game right now
Why do you think I am scum again? I actually have no idea.
Mac vote > Ztife.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 137, Mac wrote:
What makes you think this is the right person to bandwagon then? Please don't hide behind other people's opinions on him either
In post 161, Mac wrote:Slandaar.. can't you see my point here? If russianov thoughts his words were being twisted, why didn't he say anything? Why didn't he challenge twitch? Why did he leave until he was voting for him to say it?
It reeks of him waiting for others to build a bandwagon and then him saying "yep, what they said and look he twisted my words too!"
I believe your point changed Mac. Perhaps if I argue it it will change again?-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 209, Bacde wrote: He linked to a player being sure that Slandaar was scum, but who was wrong.
No the point was they were saying I made no sense (but I was right)-
-
Slandaar
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
There is your buddy mac voting Russian
I don't remember a moz wagon
I said except twitch
That was quite the desperate response.-
-
Slandaar
-
-
Slandaar
-
- Slandaar
-
-
-
-
-