In post 2997, popsofctown wrote:skullduggery should just rename this thread "the wgeurts, popsofctown, nicole mimi scumchat QT with some spectators permitted"
like this post is pretty town imo
In post 2997, popsofctown wrote:skullduggery should just rename this thread "the wgeurts, popsofctown, nicole mimi scumchat QT with some spectators permitted"
In post 2995, popsofctown wrote:Survivor is a subcategory of scumtells that have to do with self-preservation. It's a turn of phrase
In post 2986, SirCakez wrote:In post 2978, Nicole Mimi Tithel wrote:K, TSO is scum. Add that to the list of things I need to accomplish.
Are you going to elaborate on this or no?
In post 2803, Maxous wrote:If pisskop flips scum doctor we're lynching YT
In post 3006, grapes wrote:Dude when I've a role that's important. Cop Doc whatever I'm self interested as town too.
Hell, even as VT.
In post 3009, YT2980 wrote:In post 2803, Maxous wrote:If pisskop flips scum doctor we're lynching YT
OMG, thanks for pointing that out.
If I'm town, does that mean pisskop has to be town for protecting me? Is there any scum explanation for him protecting me other than simply lying about his target?
In post 3011, popsofctown wrote:In post 3009, YT2980 wrote:In post 2803, Maxous wrote:If pisskop flips scum doctor we're lynching YT
OMG, thanks for pointing that out.
If I'm town, does that mean pisskop has to be town for protecting me? Is there any scum explanation for him protecting me other than simply lying about his target?
Please make you're next post "This is the first time I have ever played in a Large Theme.", with no other text. For my heart conditions' sakes.
In post 1873, Nero Cain wrote:Part of me is like mimi's claim is so bizarre that it couldn't be fake but the other part says "Would that really be here?" and I think not so consider my vote on Mimi is spirit. Still don't trust Rob though.
In post 1889, beeboy wrote:In post 1887, Nicole Mimi Tithel wrote:I would like anyone who doesn't buy the guilty result on me to explain why the hell scum-Rob would claim a guilty on me, when all it'd do is probably get him lynched the next day. And ya it could have been a legit guilty even if he is scum here, but if he was scum, with an info role and got a guilty, why would he openly post it and basically tell the other scum team to shoot him?
To be honest I can't grasp the situation at all which is why I am aborting.
In post 1908, Venmar wrote:Rob went so balls to the wall to tryign to allure his role without claiming that I think he should just claim at this point because if he's town he's fucking dead anyways.
In post 1911, PeregrineV wrote:In post 1694, Rob14 wrote:So I just remembered to actually check my PMs and read what my night action result was.
Nicole Mimi, claim now. If not, you're getting quick-lynched. I have an incriminating result, but I'm not going to say what type so that the counter-claim cannot be tailored. I want a full claim - name, role, and who you targeted last night, including result of said action.
In post 1887, Nicole Mimi Tithel wrote:I would like anyone whodoesn'tbuy the guilty result on me to explain why the hell scum-Rob would claim a guilty on me, when all it'd do is probably get him lynched the next day. And ya it could have been a legit guilty even if he is scum here, but if he was scum, with an info role and got a guilty, why would he openly post it and basically tell the other scum team to shoot him?
If you read his claim, it directly contradicts yours. If you are telling the truth, how do you think HE is telling the truth?
In post 1922, Rob14 wrote:I didn't even check my PMs until the moment I made that post, you dolt. I didn't forget a guilty.
The day started while I was working on some stuff due this morning, and I just saw the thread open. I haven't been getting emails when I get PMs lately for some reason.
In post 1927, beeboy wrote:In post 1922, Rob14 wrote:I didn't even check my PMs until the moment I made that post, you dolt. I didn't forget a guilty.
The day started while I was working on some stuff due this morning, and I just saw the thread open. I haven't been getting emails when I get PMs lately for some reason.
So you used an investigative action and didn't think of it. You also saw at least 2 new messages in your inbox and decided to not read them. Ya this is way too fishy to be legit.
VOTE: Rob
In post 1932, T S O wrote:If you think Rob is scum who has decided to Guilty Nicole then you should still be voting Nicole.
In post 1935, beeboy wrote:I think Rob is a scum investigator who was being honest about the claim (or simply lying scum). In multi ball right now Rob being a scum investigator makes sense. Also as town if you are investigating people you actually care about I doubt you wouldn't check your pms to see what the result was but as scum it is reasonable to assume that the result isn't important to you which is why you didn't bother to check it.
If my theory is true determining whether rob is investigative scum or just lying scum we can just watch him flip and if he flips an investigative role we can confirm that Nicole is also scum.
In post 1947, beeboy wrote:In post 1941, Rob14 wrote:I saw ZERO FUCKING THIGNS UIN MY INBOX.
I DON'T GET EMAILS WHEN I GET PMs. I DIDN'T KNOW ANYTHING WAS THERE.
I clicked a bookmark to come to the thread while I was procrastinating on an assignment I was in the middle of working on and checking up on my mod commitments. I noticed the thread was open and started reading . THIS IS NOT HARD TO UNDERSTAND
You are a scum investigator if you are an investigator at all. Town would want to check there pms if they actually cared about the results of the night action but to a scum investigator those results aren't that relevant until the night phase.
In post 1978, pisskop wrote:In post 1968, YT2980 wrote:I'm convinced pisskop and starbucks are scum partners.
I think its customary for new players to play in newbie games first before omgusing people to death
In post 1984, SirCakez wrote:Beeboy is waffling more then actual waffles. Second time now he's heavily whiteknighted someone then turned around and voted them.
In post 2046, grapes wrote:In post 2043, Nicole Mimi Tithel wrote:Some people even as scum in multiball will play it as if they were single-faction scum (i.e. playing for survival). Could easily enough see Aafter going for this approach.
Gonna go with occams razor for now and say he probably just doesn't have that good a scumgame.
Flavor point doesn't really do it for me either.
In post 2056, Suzune wrote:In the earlier part of the game, I thought she was townieish. She seemed like she was scum hunting. But as the game has gone on she has lost some of that strength and I began to question whether she just happened to fall into a good spot early on. I'm kind of scum leaning on Elyse. She is taking the quite way out. She is not really talking about much and is being over defensive in the posts that she talking with other people. She asks a lot of questions but does not allow us the same insight into her because she does not share much either just agrees or lets the question hang. This really pings me.
In post 2091, Venmar wrote:If Mimi is confirmed scum, like you said, then as far as I am concerned the reads don't matter. If Mimi is town, then she can knock herself out I guess.
In post 2110, Nicole Mimi Tithel wrote:First off, I think dwlee's Elyse point he made before he got lynched was mostly solid, although there's more to it than what he said. In 134, she claimed she explicitly remembered him exuding the aura of town confidence where anyone who pushes you is dumb regardless of how good your posts are objectively. Then in 1287 she pushes him for doing the same thing. Her justification is that in the previous game it was in response to him being "scum read" while here he was the "de facto lynch", which is probably true. My issue with it is that even if this was a true statement, it isn't actually a valid justification. It's the same fucking mindset, regardless of if you're being scum read or seriously pressured, and in fact I would expect it to be the other way around: it'd be _more_ prevalent if you're under more pressure, not less. I think the justification she made was a complete afterthought, and so was her "reaching out" to him afterward, as I said before - you don't fucking reach out to someone who you think is practically confscum.
In post 2110, Nicole Mimi Tithel wrote:I usually don't mind posts like this, but this actually is a scummy redirecting-conversation attempt. Someone getting a guilty doesn't just mean that everyone else needs to shut the fuck up and follow it immediately; there is nothing wrong with alternate conversation in the meantime as long as people acknowledge it in due time eventually. This reads more as an attempt to appear proactive and useful, without actually doing anything.
In post 2144, grapes wrote:Like, almost50 needs death bad. My vote is on that over a cop guilty. Yea that bad.
Plus Nicoles CONTENT though.
Still dunno. My brain says yes and my heart says no kinda thing.
In post 2153, wgeurts wrote:Right.
I am your God now and we're doing what I say today or you commit deicide.
Any protective roles out there should be on Rob tonight. Then depending on what Rob answers to Mimi the town vig (obviously out there as there were three kills and if we have three scum kills Skull has some explaining to do) should or should not vig Mimi.
In the meanwhile we shall lynch scum; namely Pisskop.
I'm am your Lord. You are my servants. This is my will.
Gladiate: Pisskop
I sir, challenge you to a duel.
In post 2178, Rob14 wrote:It's absolutely WIFOM for you to high effort it and then claim only town you would do that, since you were already planning your defense when you decided to high effort it.
In post 2180, SirCakez wrote:Maxous's entrance was pretty weak. Didn't drop any reads and instead asked a pointless question that I'm sure Nicole would have answered by now. Need to see actual content from there.
In post 2237, Nicole Mimi Tithel wrote:After I flip, you'll be run up and forced to fullclaim, and then if you're town I can almost guarantee that someone will figure out some bullshit reason (either an oversight or role info) which explains what happened today which, if claimed today would have just cleared this up immediately.
That's the point I'm making.
In post 2242, Almost50 wrote:In post 2240, Elyse wrote:I'm sorry this week has been crazy for me. Looks like I will have to do another catchup post soon but I don't have time today either.
This is really hurting my overall read about you. I just might change my mind and visit you instead of grapes.