[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 9654358 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Newbie 1827: Baseball Game Over - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #55 (isolation #4) » Tue Oct 10, 2017 9:41 am
Postby gameplay506 »
In post 47, Thestatusquo wrote:Yes. Wanted to throw some shit at derpy to see what happened. He doesn't get a pass for this, but he does not get my vote for it either. Taiho gets some town points in my book for essentially coming to the same conclusion. I have a hard time seeing their posts on the subject coming from scum.
I don't like gameplay506's post 19, though. One of the things that I look at early in the game is which players are attempting to hide in randomness and which players are trying to end it.
So VOTE: gameplay
Cool
In post 49, wilky wrote:also what's everyones views on the interaction between Hooves, Luca and Gameplay on page 1?
Does anyone think CsBlastoise getting over defensive on post #28 or do you think he just doesn't understand RVS?
Post
Post #89 (isolation #6) » Wed Oct 11, 2017 7:21 am
Postby gameplay506 »
In post 72, UC Voyager wrote:FIRST READS
disclaimer: first reads are not final. they will change and adapt to new information, and final reads will be completely different
im getting a scum lean from derpy (the rush to leave RVS. you cant force your way out, but it could also be townie trying to get straight to finding scum, so it is just a lean)
im getting a town read from thestatusqou (seems very townie right off the bat)
Wilky seems to be ...im not exactly sure. i might need to think about it.
Just the opposite
Derpy albeit annoying and confusing seems genuine
Cant say the same for status
Never been a fan of mindless questioning esp so early in the game
Post
Post #90 (isolation #7) » Wed Oct 11, 2017 7:23 am
Postby gameplay506 »
In post 28, CsBlastoise wrote:Well, wilky, it's not exactly fun to come to the active game for the first time and find out that you've been randomly lynched. I'll start defending myself later if I have to.
This is something I also like
Btw by my calculations now only lucifer hasn't posted so thats better
Post
Post #158 (isolation #12) » Fri Oct 13, 2017 11:15 am
Postby gameplay506 »
In post 154, Luca Blight wrote:I'm gonna find it hard not to scumread Wilky until I can understand his thought-process behind this:
In post 52, wilky wrote:Whilst I don't think any of the posts indicate any players role,
if Hooves actively and effectively scum hunts it might be nice to revisit Luca.
So what is the big problem with this post ?
Short and simple, I just skimmed your wallfight with wilky and I don't have the patience to search for an answer there
I have a town read on them. They have made a decent case on Willy. Willy isl trying to make a case on them to.. And I have a scum read on Willy.
Shea
Spoiler:
I have a scum lean of him. i found his reaction to my entrance weird. He was talking about the whole RVS thing. About how it ends or whatever. Why does that matter? Shouldn't we be scum hunting?
Willy
Spoiler:
So I'm getting. A scum read on Willy. they tried to make a case on Derpy early on, but when one person found it scummy, he immediately found that person scummy. With not much to go off of, that's what I think.
In post 154, Luca Blight wrote:I'm gonna find it hard not to scumread Wilky until I can understand his thought-process behind this:
In post 52, wilky wrote:Whilst I don't think any of the posts indicate any players role,
if Hooves actively and effectively scum hunts it might be nice to revisit Luca.
So what is the big problem with this post ?
Short and simple, I just skimmed your wallfight with wilky and I don't have the patience to search for an answer there
Because what does Derpy's scumhunting or lack of it have to do with me?
I voted him on page 1 because he said he wouldn't push scumreads until day two. Wilky then says if Derpy decides to scumhunt it would 'be nice to revisit Luca' - which implies his scumhunting would make me look scummy. How could I be held accountable for something that happened
after
the post in question?
Wilky hasn't been able to answer this and has been backtracking that he meant it incriminated me, when clearly that's what was implied.
What
What
?
Sry but this makes no sense
The whole you vs wilky is a headache of nonsensical posts and unless you have something more than this i suggest you back out cus wilky seems more like frustrated town than scum
I was thinking of switching my rvs vote but voyagers recent posts make not want to
In post 183, gameplay506 wrote:Jesus fkin wilky walls kill a game please
Quick got anything more to add?
That catchup just seems incomplete
Luca is trying too hard. Inclined to think Town, but the way he bulldogs it makes me second guess that.
You complain a lot.
Hooves has an interesting approach, but consider what the IC said to to UCV about getting out of RVS I think that applies here.
Quo is playing strong. Don't know that I get his reads.
Cs is weird for thinking this is a fast game.
taiho doesn't seem like a weakling
Page Tops are for mods.
I have a town read on them. They have made a decent case on Willy. Willy isl trying to make a case on them to.. And I have a scum read on Willy.
Shea
Spoiler:
I have a scum lean of him. i found his reaction to my entrance weird. He was talking about the whole RVS thing. About how it ends or whatever. Why does that matter? Shouldn't we be scum hunting?
Willy
Spoiler:
So I'm getting. A scum read on Willy. they tried to make a case on Derpy early on, but when one person found it scummy, he immediately found that person scummy. With not much to go off of, that's what I think.
Luca says that Wiky made a case on Derpy when He didn't......This is alarming because it looked like Luca made a case o derpy if anything
Luca rushed Wilky and only focused on Wilky.
Guiding a miss lynch is a scum move last i checked
UNVOTE:
But last page you gave him a townread and he had already accused wilky of making a case on Derpy
So, what?
Post
Post #197 (isolation #18) » Sun Oct 15, 2017 11:51 am
Postby gameplay506 »
You are suddenly making a 180 on Luca on stuff that was already in the thread when you last sorted him out.
And that flimsy reasoning for jumping on the wilky wagon also doesn't sit well with me.
I have a town read on them. They have made a decent case on Willy. Willy isl trying to make a case on them to.. And I have a scum read on Willy.
Shea
Spoiler:
I have a scum lean of him. i found his reaction to my entrance weird. He was talking about the whole RVS thing. About how it ends or whatever. Why does that matter? Shouldn't we be scum hunting?
Willy
Spoiler:
So I'm getting. A scum read on Willy. they tried to make a case on Derpy early on, but when one person found it scummy, he immediately found that person scummy. With not much to go off of, that's what I think.
Luca says that Wiky made a case on Derpy when He didn't......This is alarming because it looked like Luca made a case o derpy if anything
Luca rushed Wilky and only focused on Wilky.
Guiding a miss lynch is a scum move last i checked
UNVOTE:
But last page you gave him a townread and he had already accused wilky of making a case on Derpy
So, what?
In post 197, gameplay506 wrote:You are suddenly making a 180 on Luca on stuff that was already in the thread when you last sorted him out.
And that flimsy reasoning for jumping on the wilky wagon also doesn't sit well with me.
In post 154, Luca Blight wrote:I'm gonna find it hard not to scumread Wilky until I can understand his thought-process behind this:
In post 52, wilky wrote:Whilst I don't think any of the posts indicate any players role,
if Hooves actively and effectively scum hunts it might be nice to revisit Luca.
So what is the big problem with this post ?
Short and simple, I just skimmed your wallfight with wilky and I don't have the patience to search for an answer there
Because what does Derpy's scumhunting or lack of it have to do with me?
I voted him on page 1 because he said he wouldn't push scumreads until day two. Wilky then says if Derpy decides to scumhunt it would 'be nice to revisit Luca' - which implies his scumhunting would make me look scummy. How could I be held accountable for something that happened
after
the post in question?
Wilky hasn't been able to answer this and has been backtracking that he meant it incriminated me, when clearly that's what was implied.
What
What
?
Sry but this makes no sense
The whole you vs wilky is a headache of nonsensical posts and unless you have something more than this i suggest you back out cus wilky seems more like frustrated town than scum
I was thinking of switching my rvs vote but voyagers recent posts make not want to
Which actually reminds me that he hasnt addressed the first 2
Post
Post #249 (isolation #20) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 5:41 am
Postby gameplay506 »
In post 239, Thestatusquo wrote:Most notably, he's skating. This might be a difference in philosophy about mafia, but most of what I look for in the early game is who is playing the game and who is attempting to hide in randomness. I think that gameplay has done very little to advance the game out of randomness. His post 19, where I originally voted him, was a chance to pressure derpyhooves which he didn't take. He commented on something and then sort of shrugged and made a joke. He came so close to taking an actual action that would progress the game without actually doing so. It's almost as if he asked himself "What is the least game content I can generate with this post while still looking like I'm commenting on the game."
That was definitely a good enough reason for a vote on page 1. Going forward, I just have found no reason to revise this early read. Almost all of the things that game play posts have been very minimal in terms of progressing the game. He's cast shallow aspersions on some of the arguments of other players. He hasn't really put pressure anywhere, and his arguments haven't seemed designed to find scum. I'm pretty happy leaving my vote parked here.
But despite those 2 paragraphs on why you are comfortable leaving your vote on me and finding no reason to revise that, you vote UC with
me
Wut again?
Also Im not doing much on day 1s unless some shit happens that really bothers me.
And the newbs were doing a good enough job of making a discussion themselves so I was ok
Post
Post #306 (isolation #33) » Wed Oct 18, 2017 7:45 am
Postby gameplay506 »
In post 285, Quick wrote:gameplay has done nothing but make excuses all game long. Shea even caught gameplay being a hypocrite, but for some reason he changed his vote to UCV.
I am going to:
VOTE: gameplay
For making excuses and the blatant hypocritical behavior.
Show me hypocritical
Show me excuses
I dont like how you ignore the whole UC case and go for me for some made up reasons
Seems like a way to appeal to shea tbh
Pedit: Luca, luca luca
The whole heat on you is from that post you did a 180 on Luca and called him scum. What happened to that read
Post
Post #310 (isolation #35) » Wed Oct 18, 2017 8:06 am
Postby gameplay506 »
Okay eat rope
That attitude and level of trigger is just not normal
Rn wilky/UC are just making my alarms go off like crazy. Definitely one of them is scum, might even be both. Wilkys reasoning for getting on the wagon and voting UC (activity) is seriously off. Resembles bussing
UC has been posting a fair bit today, just not in this thread.
In post 189, wilky wrote:Funny that really, took you no time at all to reply there. My vote on you was to see how long it took you to come out the woodwork whilst posting pretty frequently elsewhere. 2 minutes is impressive
Post
Post #379 (isolation #40) » Tue Oct 24, 2017 11:29 am
Postby gameplay506 »
In post 376, Quick wrote:Sorry for not being more active in this game. I have bitten off more than I can chew in the games I signed up for. I am just coming back to Mafia after a few months of not playing.
I still like tsq for Scum. I also still think gameplay has a decent chance to be Scum. I would prolly lynch Wilky if it came down to it. I don't know if cs hammers here as a newb mistake or if they are just Scum. In any case I think it will be fairly apparent given time on what cs' alignment is.
So you go from trying to get on sheas good side to scumreading more experienced players.
Cool
I got the reason for mescum but wanna tell us those for the sheascum?
Anyway wilky why haven't you placed a vote/voiced any suspicion yet?
Post
Post #445 (isolation #44) » Wed Oct 25, 2017 6:26 am
Postby gameplay506 »
uh
uhhhhhhh
why would scum TSQ claim rn?
Like what
Why would town TSQ claim rn?
??
From both PoV this was a very dumb and bold play.
I suggest we stick with leaving the night phase resolve TSQ and lynching wilky
Post
Post #492 (isolation #46) » Sat Oct 28, 2017 8:53 pm
Postby gameplay506 »
Ye can you please get ur votes on wilky. The night will determine tsq's alignment. Tbh his plays until now just make me wanna call him VI.
Wilky has had a really opportunistic day 1 and he continues that on day 2. He hasn't took any stances or placed any votes. He is just waiting for wagons to start forming.
In post 482, gameplay506 wrote:Ye im waiting for cs and wilky to actually say something
Quick that shallow reasoning for voting me aint gonna pass on day 2
Well, right now I am considering you DH, and wilky. You haven't really seem much pressure except for the claimed IC Tracker.
In post 490, Quick wrote:We have zero wagons... We need to start doing... something to change that.
You are either living with a couple of braincells or scum.
Why isn't tsq on the list?
The reasons for mescum are so outdated and bad so why am I a better vote than wilky?
I feel you are just going between me and tsq for the credit of going after the IC/SE. And that vote on me serves no meaning given your shallow reasoning, more like testing the waters.
And Derpy that was directed at you.
There is no further reason for us to delve on TSQ. We are not going to know if he is lying or not unless we lynch him and given the fact there has been no cc lynching him is just not happening.
Post
Post #666 (isolation #54) » Wed Nov 01, 2017 10:36 am
Postby gameplay506 »
In post 635, Thor665 wrote:What are your current reads, caught up or not?
wikly, quick, cs can all die
taiho is so-so, leaning town. I like him but he has parked his vote on cs who has been practically offline the whole game and has done nothing else
derpy is town
your slot is so-so. Awful plays but uncc'd
Wilky has been extremely scummy all day 1 and day 2. His behavior today is off and makes me feel like he is trying to lurk himself out of a lynch. And he has been extremely neutral and meh which backs up my thoughts.
Quick as I already said is either braindead or scum. His vote hopping today is something I can't explain and its backed by such shallow reasoning.
Cs's hammer was bad and his posts have all gave me neutral to scum vibes.
Also I do not intend to read walls. So that fight between thor and derpy is a no.
Post
Post #672 (isolation #57) » Wed Nov 01, 2017 10:58 am
Postby gameplay506 »
In post 670, wilky wrote:Also, regarding "trying to lurk himself out of a lynch" you have been pretty inactive over the course of D2 and even came in with a prod dodge yet i'm the one lurking to avoid lynch.
What posts from CS have looked scummy to you? I can see the hammer one and possibly his first first post as looking a bit scummy but have his others looked scummy to you aswell?
I was not in danger of a lynch
I actually posted quite a lot at the beginning of d2 just lost interest when those fights between derpy & ic slot occurred
So you can't really make those 2 equal
And about CS, I don't know his iso by heart but its the general vibe that his posts give. I rely a lot on feelings and that's a good enough reason for me.
In post 669, gameplay506 wrote:Ye you became active
Actively concerned with yourself and not who is scum
You say it as if I only became active because of that though. So what you are saying is when I said last week I would be a bit more inactive until the weekend I could foresee what was going to happen in the future once I was able to be more active?
The self defense has transitioned to flailing, how nice
Post
Post #721 (isolation #59) » Thu Nov 02, 2017 10:45 pm
Postby gameplay506 »
In post 719, taiho wrote:He was the one who defended ucv about the scum slip, and the fishy activity.
I was the one who actually led the wagon, never did I defend UC.
I just said the slip was an idiotic argument because it was.
Anyway im just too lazy and have no interest whatsoever. This day went on for too long and has been so unproductive/uninteresting