In post 274, LuckyOtter wrote: In post 245, Momrangal wrote:
In post 224, LuckyOtter wrote:
Pedit: Momrangal, I was just about to ask you about this again. I don't understand your reaction to my question in 177. Do you have a read on Dunn?
It means what I said. You brought up a good point, made a good observation and it shows that you are thinking critically.
An observation no one else seemed to really think anything about. Even after I reposted, only one other person had made a comment on it.
Up until this point however, wisdom is featured in many people scum reads and in a few of those people I could also be scum (math,fitz) depending on how things go. I'm pretty disappointed in the lack of reactions to it, but honestly the lack of them also got my brain churning
This bit is actually pretty informative and changes some of my reads. So here's the sequence of events:
- momrangal votes Wisdom early on
- Dunn votes Wisdom (95)
- momrangal says "that's probably a bad vote" (98) and meanwhile doesn't change hers
- I ask her why she doesn't change her vote
- She says this is a good question (which read to me as possibly sarcastic) and asks others to comment (177), and reposts this when it doesn't get any reactions (223)
- Math is the only one to pick up on it and uses it as a chance to paint me as trying to protect Wisdom (235)
- Momrangal says she meant it that it was a good question and that she was fishing for reactions.
First, I'm buying momrangal's claim. I can't see scum highlighting their own inconsistency in this way, just to bait someone (and to what end?). Seems like a high risk/low reward strategy.
So then the question is, what to make of the lack of reactions? I would think if momrangal were on scum's lynch agenda, they'd have pounced on this. Why not take the opportunity to at least throw some suspicion her way? The only answer that comes to mind is if doing so would be a detriment to their actual lynch agenda, and this would be the case if their agenda included Wisdom. If you're trying to get Wisdom mislynched, it makes no sense to draw any attention to bad votes on him.
So who has Wisdom on their agenda: Fitz, Math, Kokichi, and Hiraki.
Now, Math did draw attention to 223, but does so in a way that still paints Wisdom as scum, and as I said, paints me as protecting him so adds to his story.
I'm having a hard time reading Math, though. I'm still getting hard scum vibes from Fuzzy, and I don't care what Math says, I don't think scum are going to bus their partner so hard on D1 when it's not really warranted. It's not like Fuzzy is the obvious lynch today (his wagon has consistently met resistance), so hard bussing your scumpartner seems like a bad move in terms of cost/benefit ratio.
Fitz was actually voting momrangal (still for a bad initial reason, imo), while never pointing out her inconsistency wrt voting Wisdom. Maybe Fitz sees momrangal as a liability to being able to push Wisdom later. Seeing that the momrangal vote is highly criticized, he moves to the eevee wagon. Why not Fuzzy? How could you possibly still be forming an opinion on Fuzzy when he's done literally nothing this game?
I don't have good reads on Hiraki or Kokichi, so I need to take the time to do this (will have to do later tonight).
I think there is scum within {Fuzzy, Fitz, Math, Kokichi, Hiraki}.
Fuzzy whatcha thinkin about?