NY 189 - Flower Viewing Festival [~fin~]
-
-
Shazam
-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
tn5421 wrote:In post 40, Spiffeh wrote:In post 38, Spiffeh wrote:VOTE: BananaCucho
Feels the need to respond to every vote, like he's a little insecure about the fact that he's getting votes?
every vote against him*
Please don't start this game with yet another case of early game WIFOM when he's probably just trolling for reactions. You're already jumping at shadows and the game only just started, this isn't healthy mentally speaking for you to be so on edge.
In any case, it's pretty presumptuous for you to assume any motives from Banana's play with barely anything to go on.
In post 44, Spiffeh wrote:I make bold votes like those this early for reactions like that ^^^^^^^
Would you prefer if we twiddle our thumbs joking around for a few more pages?
a) Your vote wasn't particularly "bold", it was just poorly supported.
b) Explain why the reaction is remotely interesting, or more importantly, how it makes him look scum or town.
c) What does your question have to do with anything? tn does not seem to me to be suggesting that we do nothing. He seems to be suggesting that you're too sure of things that you shouldn't be sure about this early. Like Banana being "insecure".-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 69, Spiffeh wrote:Bold votes probably wasn't a great term but the point still stands!
In post 42, BananaCucho wrote:In post 38, Spiffeh wrote:VOTE: BananaCucho
Feels the need to respond to every vote, like he's a little insecure about the fact that he's getting votes?
BTW this is technically false since I didn't respond to the broken charmander vote
I have read the thread twice and can't for the life of me figure out what you're referring to here.
VOTE: Spiffeh
If you've read the thread twice, you know that my last post requires more than this from you in response. Don't just ignore my post and say your point stands.
BananaCucho wrote:
Do I really need to explain it more? He scolds us and says "let's play mafia already" and I say "yeah, okay" and "start playing" by voting him
Feels pretty self explanatory I don't get what you don't understand.
Yeah, bad wagon here.Salamence20 wrote:In post 87, tn5421 wrote:So are you saying that having any reason whatsoever discludes any vote ever from being rvs, despite the reason being obviously silly?
No, what sala has to say at this point in the game is not important in the slightest.
Actually it does.
Truth.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 101, Spiffeh wrote:
In post 57, Shazam wrote:a) Your vote wasn't particularly "bold", it was just poorly supported.b) Explain why the reaction is remotely interesting, or more importantly, how it makes him look scum or town.c) What does your question have to do with anything? tn does not seem to me to be suggesting that we do nothing. He seems to be suggesting that you're too sure of things that you shouldn't be sure about this early. Like Banana being "insecure".
a. Yeah I agree with that mostly because it was like page 2.
b. Like I said, the way he commented on each vote against him makes me think he's insecure and a little uncomfortable with receiving votes. I believed that to be scummier than everything else in the thread at that point.
c. I am pointing out something I noticed about his behavior that I believe to be scummy. That's how the game is played. I don't see what was so out of the ordinary that people are exploding over it lmao
The response to b and c makes no sense. b and c were about tn's post that you were pointing to in your post. You're answering b and c like we're talking about Banana, but we're talking about tn.
It's like you're failing to pick up on your own train of thought after people question you about it.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
At this point, Spiffeh is clearly town to me, because he's genuinely saying defensive things that make no sense. His reaction to everything said about him is so emotional that if he were scum he'd be toning it down. I could explain why his latest posts make no sense, but ultimately I don't think that helps anyone else.
In post 329, Fro99er wrote:In post 327, AxleGreaser wrote:
I still dont have all the people I am not used to lined up in my head as individuals
In post 8, AxleGreaser wrote:@PeopleI have played with before.
Hi.
@peopleI have only been stalking (in a not very creepy way)
Hi.
@everyone else?
How come you did not sign up for this game?
Axle plans everything. He claims in post 8 he has read you (by saying everyone else he hasn't read didn't sign up for the game). Now he claims in post 327 he doesn't have everyone lined up????????????
AXLE IS INFORMED, PEOPLE. He read ups on things!!! For him to play dumb here is :/
Axle is scum, y'all. He's trying to appease the masses for scum reading him early on here...
In post 327, AxleGreaser wrote:The people who piled on me early, did so with about the right amount of .... "Oh look there is a bonfire over here anyone want to jump on?".
He also knows his "if frogger was town" read on me is crap.
In post 327, AxleGreaser wrote:if Frog was town, and he felt town, he was smoking as he went by me.
honestly, I'd rather town sort me and axle today and call it a day.
VOTE: Axle
This looks like all spin to me. You act so sure that you'd like to 1v1 this guy, but the entirety of your case against him is putting what he says in whatever light you feel is best. I would have taken the first 2 quotes to mean nothing. I don't know what your point about him being "informed" is. The third quote is a pretty decent analysis of his wagon. I can't say I fully understand the fourth post, but "if frogger was town" is not a read on you, so saying he knows that's crap is rather ludicrous. In short, I think you've made a bad case, but you're acting like it's a good case because you want to lynch him for other reasons.
VOTE: Fro99er-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 435, Spiffeh wrote:In post 431, Shazam wrote:At this point, Spiffeh is clearly town to me, because he's genuinely saying defensive things that make no sense. His reaction to everything said about him is so emotional that if he were scum he'd be toning it down. I could explain why his latest posts make no sense, but ultimately I don't think that helps anyone else.
So you agree that your vote on me was atrocious?
No. But you're proving my point that you genuinely make no sense and don't understand words, which causes you to overreact. "Atrocious"? It had a clearly defined reason.
And please respond to this:
In post 299, Spiffeh wrote:VOTE: Shazam
Call it OMGUS if you want but your vote and subsequent suspicion of me for not responding to you immediately and MISUNDERSTANDING your unclear request is terrible.
Also, you and tn need to stop saying writing things off as "emotional" when all I have done is respond to your shittastic reasoning.
Will post about other stuff later. Needed to get that off my chest now though.
What is there to respond to? Yeah, it's pretty much OMGUS. Yeah, I voted you so that you would respond to my actual points. Yeah you misunderstood my request. No, it wasn't unclear, since I referenced YOUR post, and what you were really doing was misunderstanding your own post. In points b and c I was talking about a "reaction" that you claimed to have gotten. The post I quoted of yours was talking about a reaction from a specific person. You took b and c to be about another person because you didn't understand your own context.
You've certainly responded to my reasoning. With anything worthwhile though? Anything that points out logical flaws? Not really. Just a bunch of genuine emotional flailing. So I think you're town.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 488, Flubbernugget wrote:In post 431, Shazam wrote:This looks like all spin to me. You act so sure that you'd like to 1v1 this guy, but the entirety of your case against him is putting what he says in whatever light you feel is best. I would have taken the first 2 quotes to mean nothing. I don't know what your point about him being "informed" is. The third quote is a pretty decent analysis of his wagon. I can't say I fully understand the fourth post, but "if frogger was town" is not a read on you, so saying he knows that's crap is rather ludicrous. In short, I think you've made a bad case, but you're acting like it's a good case because you want to lynch him for other reasons.
VOTE: Fro99er
Why do people scum read things they don't understand instead of requesting clarification to actually read someone's thought processes instead of just their words
I'm not scum reading something I don't understand. The thing I don't understand is the fourth quote from Frogger's post, which is a quote of someone else. I do not scumread that person, I scumread Frogger, who I understand.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 552, I Am Innocent wrote:In post 416, Shiro wrote:In post 415, AxleGreaser wrote:However please explain why or how you know nothing significant has happened yet or what that means.
It means that I am still null reading everyone thus for me nothing significant has happened.
This is BS
Mafia wouldn't be so blatantly hypocritical.
I Am Innocent wrote:
Wow 7 votes 24 hrs into the game with no counterwagon....wonder what that means lol
Also this. I Am Innocent seems innocent to me. The wagon sucks because it has no good reasoning behind it, and pressuring someone so content-less is pointless.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
@mod
Typo, right?
BananaCucho wrote:
Would you like to start a counter wagon on Salamance? I could entertain that.
Really? I did start a counter wagon on Fro99er. Don't pretend like Salamence and IaI are exclusive alternatives. I have no read on Salamence.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 583, BananaCucho wrote:In post 579, Shazam wrote:@mod
Typo, right?
BananaCucho wrote:
Would you like to start a counter wagon on Salamance? I could entertain that.
Really? I did start a counter wagon on Fro99er. Don't pretend like Salamence and IaI are exclusive alternatives. I have no read on Salamence.
I fail to see why you would think that's what I was implying. There's obviously other options than just those two, I was just putting forth of them.
I would think that was what you were implying because that would be the only thing relevant to my statement about IaI. If you were being relevant, you were pointing out that my being against the IaI wagon should have something to do with me voting Salamence (which I disagreed with). If it was irrelevant, fine, but you should be able to see why I thought what I did.
Spiffeh wrote:In post 582, I Am Innocent wrote:Usually D1 wagons with out counterwagons are townie ones.
Your wagon didn't really gain any momentum until recently so I believe this statement is being made too early. Also do you have examples of games where Day 1 wagons without a counterwagon resulted in mislynches?
This is an easy place to go into detail on why a lot of what you've said this game doesn't make sense.
1) He just now had 7 votes. How can any statement about his wagon be "too early"? Any "later" in the wagon, and he might be dead.
2) What does timing have to do with his point? His point is that he had a decent sized wagon with no real counter-wagon. Who cares when it happened?
3) Asking for examples is bad for two reasons: a) One can come up with examples for just about anything. It doesn't mean that whatever you're coming up with examples for is common. b) You ought to be able to accept something on principle. If it logically makes sense that a wagon with no counter-wagon is generally town, then that should be accepted as a fair argument with or without examples.
Hopefully this explanation helps you understand your earlier conflict with me. I don't wish to do what I just did with every post of yours that I find interesting, so I may just use the shorthand of "this doesn't make sense" or "overly emotional reaction" or some such thing as it applies.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 601, I Am Innocent wrote:shazam, who were the scum on my wagon?
Hard to say. Ricastle, pisskop, Salamence20, Sakura Hana, and Shiro are the ones I see as more likely than the others. You can probably throw out Ricastle for being the first on there (usually scum join an unopposed wagon later). And I'd throw out Salamence because I find him unreadable at this stage. So pisskop, Sakura Hana, Shiro? I'd guess at least one of them is scum. Maybe I should check out their iso's.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 606, Shazam wrote:In post 601, I Am Innocent wrote:shazam, who were the scum on my wagon?
Hard to say. Ricastle, pisskop, Salamence20, Sakura Hana, and Shiro are the ones I see as more likely than the others. You can probably throw out Ricastle for being the first on there (usually scum join an unopposed wagon later). And I'd throw out Salamence because I find him unreadable at this stage. So pisskop, Sakura Hana, Shiro? I'd guess at least one of them is scum. Maybe I should check out their iso's.
Took a look at the parts where they voted IaI. I'd throw pisskop out because he does a weird thing where he votes him when he's already voting him, and seems to be genuinely outraged about IaI claiming to know him. Sakura Hana and Shiro both were kinda like "ok, guess I'll vote this dude". One of them is probably scum. No idea which one yet though.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 614, I Am Innocent wrote:
Hint hint: it is the one who has given out almost no reads vs the one who has given out all reads...
If this is what you think, put your vote where your mouth is. I don't necessarily agree with this, though. I've definitely seen scum give out all their "reads" and town active lurk.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 619, I Am Innocent wrote:
PS - I think I caught spiffel in a lie, so that's where my vote is
Have you read my stuff about spiffeh? I don't think catching him in a self-contradiction (which is what it is, not a lie) is a difficult thing to do. In his case, I'm inclined to think it's not alignment-indicative.
BananaCucho wrote:
But do the reads make sense and align more or less with your reads from a town mindset is the question
Yeah, that's the question. Answering the question is the hard part. If I knew the answer I'd already be voting her or Shiro.
Spiffeh wrote:
1) I meant that the wagon has occurred too recently for people to expect there to have been a push back. Like he's only had the most lynch votes for less than 12 hours.
2) Since it happened so recently scum might not have had a chance to respond to it and start up a counter wagon, so the statement is a little premature.
3) Ok
Idk you keep making mountains out of molehills with me.
12 hours is quite a while in this game, and I think quite a few of the players in the game have posted during that time. A counter wagon definitely could have started imo. Aaaand there you go being emotional again. If you expect me to overlook something you say for being "a molehill", maybe you shouldn't post it.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 632, AxleGreaser wrote:@Shazzam
I like fair bit about your 431
What I am missing is why that made you think Frogger got a scum PM.
I would like that include how 361 (and the stuff around there) fits into that.
I actually say in 431 why it made me think Frogger is scum.
I do not find 361 to be relevant at all. Maybe you can tell me why you think it is.
Spiffeh wrote:@Shazam We can agree to disagree then about the wagon thing. I think what I'm failing to grasp is what your motivation is to continue posting elaborate responses to things solely posted by me that aren't addressed to you.
Like what do you as village gain from doing that? It was fine when you were scumreading and voting for me earlier, but now that you have me as a townread (unless that has changed?) I don't see the point of continuing it. So why?
As scum I have waged endless back-and-forth arguments to appear present and contributing, and the way you are perpetuating this thing between us makes me think you're doing something similar.
This is the first time I have ever read someone suggesting that I ought to have tunnel vision on my scumreads. Do you honestly believe that my interaction with other people has not been enough to appear present and contributing? You think that I need to interact with you to look that way? This is not to mention the obvious fact that what you do as scum may not be what I do as scum.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 639, Spiffeh wrote:If you're doing it to continue interacting with me, what are the results? What is being accomplished?
The results are the same results from any two people discussing content. It ought to help both of us develop reads on each other, and help the rest of the people in the game develop reads on us.
In post 640, AxleGreaser wrote:In post 431, Shazam wrote:In short, I think you've made a bad case, but you're acting like it's a good case because you want to lynch him for other reasons.
In post 638, Shazam wrote:I actually say in 431 why it made me think Frogger is scum.
Why is it bad case a scum made with intent and not just a bad case?
"Lynch him for other reasons" is an open ended statement I don't know what you think the other reasons might be.
I think everyone else understood this without explanation. I highlight in 431 that he is much too sure that you are scum for things that do not indicate scum in any way. He is so sure he wants to 1v1 you for the day. That is why it looks like he has reasons he's not telling us for wanting to lynch you, and the obvious implication is that he's scum, because it's Day 1. Only scum have undisclosed motives Day 1.
In post 645, Shiro wrote:Man this game goes fast
Shazam I wanted to vote a lurker IAI was the only viable lurker for voting.
I like the way you think though. I mean I think it is wrong but still liking the thought process
Interesting. So if you like the thought process, do you think you should vote Sakura Hana?
In post 658, Shiro wrote:
How he PoE who the potential scum in IAI wagon might be
Seemed legit. He is wrong about me and I think he is potentially wrong about Sakura but that doesn't negate that it seemed townie, I find it more likely that scum would just blankly blame someone in the middle or end
It is fakeable though so no strong feelings just an observation but yea
Actually, after reading this I have the exact same question. You say you like my thought process, but then even though it leads me to two people, you're saying you think both are town? And "potentially wrong" is weak sauce btw. Of course it's potentially wrong, but the question is whether it's likely to be right.
AxleGreaser wrote:I am going to assume 673 is an addendum to 672 and "their" refers to IAI.
k.
and yes i am not highly impressed by the theory that scum have to form counter wagons (in 12 hrs or less)(work commitments etc don't count for some reason?) or else the current wagon cant be on scum....
because once that is the default theory the obvious way to stall wagon on scum is do nothing.
You can always bring in a WIFOM argument, but I tend to lean towards no WIFOM being involved. Scum doing the opposite of what would logically be considered to be in their best interests is rare, especially towards the start of a game. And as I've stated before, 12 hours or less seems to have been doable, but it didn't happen. By my count, 6 people posted who were never on the IaI wagon, while the wagon was building from 3 to 7 votes. That is half of the players in the game who were never on the IaI wagon. Seems like enough to me, but it didn't happen.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 677, AxleGreaser wrote:
Uh ok, but you are going to explain to me how scum can have motives to want to lynch one person in particular D1. (especially with a bad case and day chat.)
Nope i am going to need actual examples of possible motives scum can have to 1v1 me with case you say has "things that do not indicate scum in any way".
Really? You can't think of any reasons why scum would want to lynch someone they think they can make a good case on?
My entire point is that he had a crap case, but HE DIDN'T THINK SO. The 1v1 is posturing of course imo. He's willing to 1v1 today, but when tomorrow rolls around, he will still defend himself.
I am mainly making sure that
In post 630, Shazam wrote:12 hours is quite a while in this game, and I think quite a few of the players in the game have posted during that time. A counter wagon definitely could have started imo.
That it COULD have started does not mean anything certain.
and that you sliding (getting dragged) over that line, here 606 when prompted to start analysing the wagon as if it is definitely on towny gave me a nervous tick.
This is a good point. It did take IaI asking me for me to realize that actually it was not impossible to find which of the people on his wagon were likely scum. Originally, looking at the 7 names, I didn't think I was going to be able to narrow it down to 2. But since he asked me, I tried it and it seemed to yield something.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
Ok, so as far as wagons, the IaI wagon still sucks, though with the contradiction Spiffeh caught, IaI has been shown at the very least to be incapable of thinking abstractly. Apparently some things are towntells only when they have to do with him.
The Davsto wagon always sucked, I have no idea why anyone voted him in the first place, and his claim seemed genuine and came with a pro-town attitude.
The Mario wagon is pretty decent, he's active lurking while pretending not to be active lurking. And then when he's called on something he did say, he claims it wasn't serious. Since my vote's not really doing anything,
VOTE: Mario-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 1205, MarioManiac4 wrote:In post 1177, Davsto wrote:In post 1080, MarioManiac4 wrote:Read davsti's ISO and not convinced he's scum
Although the vote on banana and ne in one post felt weird
In post 1161, MarioManiac4 wrote:
VOTE: davsto
I get a townvibe from pretty much everyone except this guy and the post where he voted me anf banana felt fake
Quite a change, don't you think? From a "not convinced he's scum" to what is essentially an OMGUS vote?
Not convinced means not a full scum read. Only you and I A I were competing wagons.
Also when did you care about claims Ika
In post 1208, MarioManiac4 wrote:In post 1206, Ricastle wrote:How exactly was making a blatantly bad push on Davsto a reaction test?
no. not explaining my reads was the reaction test.
I had to vote dabs to basically to stop me, town, from getting lynched.
This is some next level flailing. He's made a bunch of posts since getting a big wagon on him, and they have all been self-preservation posts. None of them shows a mindset of trying to put forth evidence that someone else is scum. The only thing he cares about is living. Seems like a scum mindset to me.-
-
Shazam
-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 1422, tn5421 wrote:Basically, in order from most to least suspicious on that mario wagon is Salamence, Ricastle, Spiffeh, pisskop, shiro. Shazam & Shiro are good possibilities but I don't really have a good read on either of them.
This is after the nearly confirmed vig claim from Salamence. I also don't think Ricastle or Spiffeh is scum. Since the three "most suspicious" people on the wagon are my townreads, I prefer tn to the other wagons right now. IaI is still town.
In post 1494, Spiffeh wrote:Seriously what reason does tn have to jump from Mario to Salamence, who obviously was not getting lynched, other than to distance himself from the mislynch wagon?
This is actually a good point.
VOTE: tn5421
After this post, I'd prefer if he shot you. Davsto did the same thing Slandaar and I did, except he did it earlier (joined the Mario wagon without having been on the IaI wagon). In my eyes, this makes him town because he genuinely believed Mario was scum, and didn't believe IaI was scum, which to me looks like an evidence-based vote pattern.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 1483, Echo Echo wrote:
This was Slander's last reads list. Two of the four flipped town, perhaps the other two needs a look at? In particular, I share the scumread that is Tn.
In post 936, Davsto wrote:Alright then, I'll go for someone else.
VOTE: Banana
Because that unvote was weird. Jumping off the (already falling apart) main wagon makes Spiffeh less scummy, and completely nullifies all your reads on him enough to change your vote?
Also, FoS at MarioManiac for the vote on Sala. It seems like an attempt to counterwagon but with an RVS feel so he can go "guys it was a joke".
Actually, fuckit, I think Mario is worse.
VOTE: MarioManiac
I hate this post.
In post 945, I Am Innocent wrote:Why is scum shiro coming up with such bad logic unless she's trying to protect someone?
unvote salamance
Vote davsto
If Davesto is scum, this makes IaI town.
I want to lynch Davesto still.
In post 1081, tn5421 wrote:On the other hand, I've read Mario's last 5 posts and am convinced that he's scum.
VOTE: MarioManiac4
I don't like this post. Boo. Like, what the heck?
VOTE: TN
In post 1147, tn5421 wrote:VOTE: Salamence20
Using self-meta to try to clear yourself is scummy as fuck and I'm done with putting up with your shit.
VOTE: TN
~~~
By the way, ika's obviously town. I'll defend him to the grave.
~~~
/end of Day 1.
Well, that was shite.
VOTE: TN
This post really stuck out to me, so I edited it to leave the parts I consider relevant. Look at how bad his case on tn is. "I don't like this post" is the best he can do here. And he has the same response to Davsto, but doesn't vote Davsto. Since I'm convinced Davsto is town, this makes Echo Echo look really bad to me. It looks like busing for towncred plus a setup for a mislynch later. Or it could be a townie who feels like he doesn't have to give reasons for things, and ends up making two bad cases, one of which I happen to concur with and the other of which I don't. The reason I lean towards the former is that, reading Echo's iso, he seems capable of being more reasonable than this. But it's something for people to keep an eye on either way.-
-
Shazam
-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 1530, I Am Innocent wrote:
2) Sakura - likely Mason
AND
pisskip, spiffeh, and ricastle. At least 1 (33% chance) or 2 (67% chance) has to be scum, as uncoincidentally, these 7 players also ended up on Mario's wagon.
The two that did not end up on Dav's wagon....spiffeh and ricastle.
I stand by what I said earlier, I think these are the best two candidates for lynch today. Both started the day pushing town wagons (mine and Shiro), both had posts D1 saying "if mario flips town, look at so and so", both were on two town wagons D1, and avoided the 3rd major wagon of D1.
Did you explain the Sakura read somewhere? I couldn't find it skimming your iso. Also, if you thought she was a mason, why would you out it? In my opinion, she has as good a chance of being scum as those other three you mentioned. As I've stated before, I don't think it's spiffeh. If you feel strongly about Ricastle, I could possibly be convinced to vote him. But I would need something else besides this PoE. Same goes for pisskop.
EDIT: And now Sakura has explicitly said she's not a mason, which I think is automatically true.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 1550, Sakura Hana wrote:Btw Shazam, Echox2 started this whole tn thing, spiffeh just followed along with his own case, while Echo's case sux, if he hadn't mentioned anything like that, i dont think ppl would have been motivated to take a 2nd look at tn at the momment.
If tn is scum why is Echo's case busing? He had no need to do something like that.
Actually, you're right. I had misunderstood the interaction between Echo and Spiffeh at the start of the wagon. Echo did in fact motivate others to make a more complete case than he himself did. Looks more townie than it did before. I still don't like his posts since then.
In post 1551, Spiffeh wrote:
Not sure if I believe the claim or not but IaI shouldn't be vigged. If he's actually town he'll most likely be dealt with sooner or later.
What does this mean? Are you really throwing out the WIFOMy expectation that scum will kill him if he's town?-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 1560, I Am Innocent wrote:In post 1323, I Am Innocent wrote:After checking some things I also don't think Sakura is the scum on my and Mario's wagon either.
That leaves prob 2 or 3 in (ricastle, pisskop, salamance, and spiffeh)
For shazaam
This isn't evidence, but even if it was, mason is awfully specific. I'm thinking the most likely scum on your wagon are Sakura and pisskop, followed by Ricastle, then Spiffeh. And I think it's only one (just maybe two) of them, because of my other reads.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 1564, Sakura Hana wrote:@Shazam: Why do you think i am scum, i don't think you've ever explained that.
Post 611 (iso 11) plus the fact that IaI basically cleared Shiro.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 1590, Sakura Hana wrote:In post 1589, Shazam wrote:In post 1564, Sakura Hana wrote:@Shazam: Why do you think i am scum, i don't think you've ever explained that.
Post 611 (iso 11) plus the fact that IaI basically cleared Shiro.
That doesn't answer my question, if you think it does it implies that:
1) My vote there was so scummy that you would question why you aren't voting me.
2) Your stance on me hasn't changed within about 1000 posts that have happened in the thread, in which case one would think you'd have more stuff about me to comment on.
1) Your vote there is very scummy, not just because you voted a townie but because you are by a fair margin (imo, of course) the most viable scum to have done so. This does not automatically mean I should vote you right now, though. I see a greater benefit to town from pursuing something else right now. I wonder why you have such a problem with this.
2) Why are you so concerned with how much I comment on you? No, my stance on you has not changed significantly in that time EXCEPT for the very thing I pointed out in the post that started this conversation. There is a good reason for this. Anyone who has been following your posts will know what I'm talking about. Your posts have so little individual content that it's hard to find anything major in a single post. Maybe I'll iso you soon to piece things together, but I hate the confirmation bias that comes from doing something like that.
You could change this by voting tn.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 1610, Sakura Hana wrote:In post 1607, Shazam wrote:1) Your vote there is very scummy, not just because you voted a townie
So town is never wrong?
In post 1607, Shazam wrote:but because you are by a fair margin (imo, of course) the most viable scum to have done so. This does not automatically mean I should vote you right now, though. I see a greater benefit to town from pursuing something else right now. I wonder why you have such a problem with this.
Why didn't you push me back then then?
In post 1607, Shazam wrote:This does not automatically mean I should vote you right now, though. I see a greater benefit to town from pursuing something else right now. I wonder why you have such a problem with this.
This still doesn't explain why you didn't vote me back then, nor have been pushing me at all.
In post 1607, Shazam wrote:2) Why are you so concerned with how much I comment on you? No, my stance on you has not changed significantly in that time EXCEPT for the very thing I pointed out in the post that started this conversation. There is a good reason for this. Anyone who has been following your posts will know what I'm talking about. Your posts have so little individual content that it's hard to find anything major in a single post. Maybe I'll iso you soon to piece things together, but I hate the confirmation bias that comes from doing something like that.
It's not whether im concerned with how much you comment on me. It's whether your read on me is fake or not, because if it isn't you shouldn't have much issue backing it up.
Your first question is irrelevant. Being part of a wagon on a nearly-confirmed townie is scummy. The fact that some town did this does not serve as a counterpoint.
Your second question and third statement have been answered already. You are being dense, and it seems purposeful. I didn't vote you back then because I was less sure about the others on the wagon. I've responded in two ways to the fact that I haven't pushed you very hard. Please just wait your turn.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
pisskop wrote:stych? stiek. sticke. w.e
Shtick?
Since little of interest has been said in the last 12+ hours, and tn's lynch is progressing, I decided to take Sakura up on her offer and look at her iso.
In post 1041, Sakura Hana wrote:Btw guys, shorter deadlines doesn't mean "let's deadline scramble every day phase".
It means we have to start thinking of compromising sooner JUST IN CASE whoever we want to lynch is driven to L-1 and then suddenly we don't want to lynch him anymore so we have enough time to move elsewhere.
This is probably ironic considering i didnt vote IaI and voted Mario instead, but i'm not even sure where the votes currently stand wrt both and I wanna know who else would be on board about IaI.
Basically I want everyone to say who they would be ok with wagoning as of >Right now< so we dont end up with half the people on 1 wagon and half the people on the other wagon arguing about why their wagon is the best one. Also if you think any of the current possible wagons is a bad idea, please state why.
Encourages everyone to use less than the whole day and make less than optimal choices as long as someone gets lynched. Recognizes that trying to act like a townie has led her to do something different from this, but wants everyone else to act less townie than her.
In post 1250, Sakura Hana wrote:I see Ika replaced in, that's good, it's someone I know how to read, so far this looks like town ika.
Also regardless be careful Ika has an itchy hammer finger on anything that's at L-1 so L-2 should be considered L-1
@Davsto: In general i dislike making long posts unless i'm making a case or replying to someone in quotes, so you'll have to deal with my shorter posts sorry!
Makes a "look how townie I am" warning post that once again contradicts the mindset she wants everyone else to have of "make sure someone gets lynched even if you have to compromise".
This is all I could find of substance from the time Sakura referenced as 1000 posts. Sadly her posting style does not lend itself well to my scumhunting techniques, but this coupled with the IaI wagon analysis and "clearing" of Shiro is enough for me to call her scum.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
Hotel-Wifi-Short-Post:
I like the Flubbernugget wagon because he was the only one who was around when the tn wagon was happening and opposed it to any extent without providing any alternative. However, it should be noted that Fro99er also was not seemingly interested in a tn wagon, though he wasn't around to react to it when it did happen. Yeah, he implies he would have been in favor of it based on his early scumread of tn, but if that was persuasive, he'd be voting Axle right now, the other guy he called confscum early on. I'm unconvinced, and would be just as happy with a Fro99er lynch today. I'm also still scumreading Sakura, and her vote of tn does fit into a late bus framework for me.
But I'm ok with lynching Flubber today. I'm not going to pile my vote on, because I'm going to be gone all day and an ika hammer would limit our discussion today.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 2100, Firebringer wrote:I am on my phone, so no long post.
Ugh can't believe shirt died.
I went through trouble of reading everything and had shirk as scum >.>
No. This is not for real.
VOTE: Firebringer-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 2205, Ricastle wrote:Me, Sala, Fire, Davsto, Axle, and ika are all town. That leaves the 3 scum in Spiffeh, Fro99er, pisskop, Sakura, Shazam, and Echo. With the assumption that Fire is town we can nail Piss as scum right off the bat. Echo is looking less and less likely the more scum wagons he starts out of nowhere but you never know. Town for now though. Spiffeh looks pretty genuine and towny, too, and that push on tn was good, which leaves Fro99er, Sakura and Shazam. Take two out of those and you have the most likely team.
imo, it's piss/Fro99er/Shazam. Let's do this.
You realize that I've pushed Sakura, Fro99er, and tn, right? And still do scumread Fro99er and Sakura?
Between pisskop and Firebringer, I think it's smarter to go by what they've actually posted than setup speculation about their roles. To me, Firebringer has been more self-contradictory.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 2303, Fro99er wrote:\
This makes me want to vote Davsto again. The end of D1 wagon on him was likely all town (two confirm towns, me I know I'm town, and Echo is prob town?). His wagon fizzled pretty quickly and Mario got flashwagoned. Should look at who went off Davsto and onto Mario earlier D1. I need to check tn/davsto interactions as well to confirm my thoughts.
This is so bad. Four town players voting the same player does not make the latter scum. It doesn't even have a particular tendency towards that, because it happens all the time. Also, you appear to be outright admitting that you have no intention of reading Davsto objectively. You're reading his interactions only to confirm your thoughts.
PEDIT:
Fro99er wrote:In post 2310, Davsto wrote:So can anyone explain why, as scum, I wouldn't have just hammered the shit out of pisskop?
Towncred
Seriously? You will do anything to say Davsto is scum.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 2316, Fro99er wrote:In post 2313, Shazam wrote:Seriously? You will do anything to say Davsto is scum.
And you'll do anything to say I'm scum. So we're even.
2313 said nothing about you being scum or about scumtells from you at all. Far too defensive.
VOTE: Fro99er
In post 2318, Fro99er wrote:In post 2313, Shazam wrote:you appear to be outright admitting that you have no intention of reading Davsto objectively.
So why would I admit that if I was scum? Serious question. Think about that for a second.
Why are you pointing this out yourself? Serious question. Think about that for a second.
As soon as you say that putting things a certain way makes you town, you reveal that you could have done it just to towntell as scum.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 2492, Salamence20 wrote:In post 2490, Shazam wrote:I like Sala's VCA, personally. I still want to lynch Fro99er, Fire, or Sakura, but pisskop and Axle are also acceptable due to the VCA. imo, nobody outside of those five should be lynched today.
Look at the way TN bitched about me townreading frogger.
I doubt that was bussing there
I don't see this anywhere, but even if I did, scum saying "don't townread x" where x is his buddy is not that strange.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
I'm here, and I've been reading, but nothing has been terribly interesting aside from the exchange that caused two people to replace out. I'm more against a pisskop-slot lynch than I was before. I'm hoping we can agree on axle, Frog, Hana, or Fire today. Mostly VCA on axle, and I've been talking about my scumreads on the other three as we've gone along. So maybe the rest of you could just say which of those four you're willing to lynch?-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 2605, AxleGreaser wrote:In post 2604, AxleGreaser wrote:In post 2599, Shazam wrote:Mostly VCA on axle,
So as you have said that several times andIIRC it contradicts your reads based on contentplease explain.
Nope rereading no i dont know that it does, but explain anyway please.
Salamence's 2457 http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 1#p7216421 demonstrates that your voting pattern is very scummy. You have voted my townreads and did not vote the flipped scum, at times simultaneously.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 2608, AxleGreaser wrote:still missing details
In post 2607, Shazam wrote:You have voted my townreads
So have you coloured in Dave as green? (as a strong town read?)
and you think right in the middle of driving on my scum read IaI (yeah he was town but at the time i was pressing him to find out)
right in the middle of me as scum doing that...
I turn on tn like this 1395 ?? When he lends me support?
Here was the VCA, when I got back on line and found my IaI read was wrong. (the day was about done...)
In post 1625, pieguyn wrote:tn5421 (7) - Echo Echo, Spiffeh, Salamence20, Davsto, Shazam, Ricastle, Sakura Hana
Davsto (2) - pisskop, AxleGreaser
So I followed up my Dave read.
Please explain what part of 1637 (and associated posts) you find to be unreasonable?
Yes, I strongly townread Davsto, as I have been indicating most of this game.
Regarding "turning on tn" I don't see that as a very strong attack. It's basically just a question of clarification. I think what's more interesting here is that you have seemingly filed this away as proof that you and tn aren't scum together. It leads me to wonder why you would remember such a thing specifically.
As regards 1637, I don't find it unreasonable, I find it unpersuasive and not very genuine. I don't buy him as scum from that post, and I don't buy you thinking he's scum from that post.
In post 2610, AxleGreaser wrote:In post 2609, AxleGreaser wrote:In post 1084, Shazam wrote:nd his claim seemed genuine and came with a pro-town attitude.
what claim?
In post 907, Davsto wrote:Honestly, I ain't a power role or anything so if lynching me is what it takes for you to ignore me and concentrate on the actual scum in this game then it's fine by me.
So you read his reluctance to actually do stuff as?
He seems to me to be genuinely claiming out of frustration with his lack of influence in the game and undue "scumhunting" attention he is getting. Further, he is willing to die to help the town out. Considering the context and the whole body of his posts, this seems in character to me.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 2747, Bearbert D wrote:
2740's first line is fake as fuck. Davsto+ Shazam? Would explain that weird ass town read from Shazam onto Davsto that I don't think he explained
I did explain it. At least twice iirc. Davsto and me make no sense as a team. Why would I give said "weird ass town read" if I was his partner? That would be colossally stupid. I have not stated an unconfirmed townread on any other player as strongly as I have with Davsto.
VOTE: Fro99er
Could be playing to his wincon as scum, because he might be thinking he can get people off him by self-voting. Can't really be playing to his wincon as town, since him flipping town would not make me scum in any way, but that's why he's willing to kill himself.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 2762, AxleGreaser wrote:@Shazam
You have thought Fro99er was scum for a while now.
Who besides Davsto (aka anyone but Davsto) do you think is also scum?
Why?
Sakura Hana. See my iso #26-32. Other than that, you're probably the next on the list for me, for reasons I've explained.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 2777, Fro99er wrote:In post 57, Shazam wrote:tn5421 wrote:In post 40, Spiffeh wrote:In post 38, Spiffeh wrote:VOTE: BananaCucho
Feels the need to respond to every vote, like he's a little insecure about the fact that he's getting votes?
every vote against him*
Please don't start this game with yet another case of early game WIFOM when he's probably just trolling for reactions. You're already jumping at shadows and the game only just started, this isn't healthy mentally speaking for you to be so on edge.
In any case, it's pretty presumptuous for you to assume any motives from Banana's play with barely anything to go on.
In post 44, Spiffeh wrote:I make bold votes like those this early for reactions like that ^^^^^^^
Would you prefer if we twiddle our thumbs joking around for a few more pages?
a) Your vote wasn't particularly "bold", it was just poorly supported.
b) Explain why the reaction is remotely interesting, or more importantly, how it makes him look scum or town.
c) What does your question have to do with anything? tn does not seem to me to be suggesting that we do nothing. He seems to be suggesting that you're too sure of things that you shouldn't be sure about this early. Like Banana being "insecure".
This is basically Shazam's scum claim.
Remember Fire wanted Spiffeh dead and Shazam pushes Spiffeh and defends tn here
This is one of the worst descriptions of a post I've ever read. First off, if everything you said was true, it wouldn't make me scum. Second, if it made me scum, I wouldn't be claiming scum there, you would have just done some scumhunting. But of course we must come to the most important point, which is that what you are saying is just not true. I did not really push Spiffeh in a significant way. I pressured him until I got a response, at which point (and since which point) I have called Spiffeh town. tn pushing someone that I sorta-kinda pushed doesn't make me scum in any way. Further, I am not defending tn in that post, but rather calling Spiffeh on something that doesn't make sense to me and trying to get clarification. I really don't think you believe what you said here.
@Axle
You're right, Sakura's not scum with this scumbag. His self-vote didn't deflect much suspicion, so he removed it. The above was a clear confirmation-biased attempt to find anything he could to connect me to tn and Fire. Classic OMGUS flailing.
PEDIT:
Sorta ninja'd.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
My reads are obviously static because I currently don't have time for this game. What I have said is mostly solid. What I haven't said is because I don't have time. I think my wagon is clearly scum driven because Echo's posts clearly demonstrate that I am town. More specifically, VT. Lynch me while I'm catching up if you want to, I'm not going to be fully caught up until Saturday. Just make sure to lynch Fro99er tomorrow.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 3037, Bearbert D wrote:In post 3036, Spiffeh wrote:^ Wrong
I really don't think Shazam is scum but I need to read the last few pages.
Why did we drop the suspicion on the pisskop slot? That is still my biggest scum read. Fro99er you literally agreed with my reasoning earlier when/why did that change?
If I was scum and Shazam town, why wouldn't I hammer him like right now? WIFOM and whatevet, but any day left not lynched from me would be a win.
This very question is so scummy that the point it's trying to make pales in comparison. If indeed there are two scum left as some think from Firebringer's posts, we're not terribly close to LyLo and you would need all the town points you could get.
In post 3060, Spiffeh wrote:I'd actually prefer a Dav lynch over a Bear one now after his really scummy play this day but I am willing to compromise.
Why do my townreads always vote my townreads? Your case on Davsto is really more like an argument with him. What makes you willing to compromise on Bearbert out of curiosity?
That's all I've got time for tonight, but I will hopefully get around to answering Axle's questions (again?) eventually.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 3062, AxleGreaser wrote:
Who besides Davsto (aka anyone but Davsto) do you think is also scum?
Why?[/size]
To be clear, I do not think Davsto is scum, as I have said many times (just because the question is misleading). My scumlist right now is Fro99er and Bearbert, which I don't think is mutually exclusive because Fro99er's vote of Bearbert is consistent with seeing which way the wind is blowing and bussing without much of a pro-town reason. Also this:
In post 3106, Bearbert D wrote:
I'm a big fan of distancing so I know what that is. But again, I'm not defending frogger based on those things anymore.
I've explained a bunch of times why I think Fro99er is scum, I won't go back over that. He has continued to be opportunistic and to vote in such a way that he never gets blamed for the outcome of the situation. Bearbert's recent posts are what make me think he could very well be scum.
In post 3088, Bearbert D wrote:
And Shazam hasn't done anything town. So I hate how the wagon was derailed(but I'd only look at that after a Shazam scum flip). The wagons on me, Davsto or frogger kinda died because we did something considered town(not sure what in my case). Or at leasy reasonably so. Shazsm comes, claims he's obv inno and does nothing aftrr that. How can anybody townread him?
He should know from my posts that I haven't had much time to say anything, but more importantly, I HAVE done something in my posts in the last couple days, few though they may be. I'm not going to bother supporting that, anyone can read my last few posts and see that they each have more actual content than 5 of Bearbert's posts. This looks like scum frustrated my lynch didn't go through. If he was town, he would either respect the fact that a bunch of townies unvoted me, or say that multiple scum unvoted me and make it clear who he thinks they are.
In post 3099, Bearbert D wrote:In post 3095, Fro99er wrote:In post 3088, Bearbert D wrote:Shazsm comes, claims he's obv inno and does nothing aftrr that. How can anybody townread him?
Horse hockey.
You know why I drafted to doubt Shazam scum, and it's not what you mention above. You are intentionally being "oblivious", scumbag.
I forgot about you there. Yes, obviously you explained the reason. I don't agree with it much, but yes, I know it
In post 3101, Bearbert D wrote:In post 1845, Fro99er wrote:In post 1840, Firebringer wrote:I see Fro99er thinks my slot is scum, can I get reasons why on that?
Because that's what your PM says.
About firebringer, I mentioned those two posts from frogger. Immediatly after lynching tn, he went hard after firebringer. The fact that he relaxed there after that(which is where the weird interaction came from) doesn't makr my point that he went after firebringer false. Obviously, it makes it a lot weaker, but I still didn't have faulty recollection or anything
And then in these two posts he admits he was wrong about his arguments, since he really has no choice, but he doesn't change his conclusions. It appears that he thinks the facts are irrelevant to the actions he should be taking.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 3182, Bearbert D wrote:Ok. Any VCA without context is meaningless, VCA should be a helping tool not the main one IMO.
Umm, your VCA has Shazam as scum, right? Why not vote there?
Unbelievable. This demonstrates that not only have you not read Echo's VCA, but you haven't followed my votes. But let me guess: once again, your conclusion (that I am scum somehow, some way) has not changed.
VOTE: BearbertD
I'm more confident that you were a scum on my wagon than I am about Fro99er at this point.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 3193, Fro99er wrote:If Bearbert flips town Shazam seems pretty sus knowing I'll be the next mislynch. L-1 knowing Ricastle will hammer knowing the next lynch is lined up...
I'll probably be the next lynch though if Bear flips town and we'll lose.
I wouldn't know you'd be the next mislynch. Even if I was scum I wouldn't know you'd be the next lynch. But you're also assuming I know you're a mislynch and then calling me suspect because of it. That's not a logical argument.
Secondly, I'm willing to say right now that yes, I would tend to think you were Bearbert's partner since he has been suspiciously unwilling to go with reason and get off my wagon. That has kept him off of yours. And your vote of him I have already called out as consistent with a bus. But if he flipped scum and then you flipped town, and I was pushing your wagon for no good reason, wouldn't it be obvious to everyone that I was scum? That's not going to happen because I'm not scum, but if it did I would think you'd be happy to make that trade.
Finally, why on earth would you get lynched next if Bear flipped town? I would be very much against your lynch if he flipped town.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 3197, Fro99er wrote:There's no way Bear is my hypothetical scumbuddy dude. If he flips town, how does that make me town?
I read his flip to me being town from scum reading me earlier as scum motivated by him since he knew I would be under fire today and it would be a good way to get towncred by letting everyone else push through my mislynch.
Fro99er wrote:In post 3196, Shazam wrote:But if he flipped scum and then you flipped town, and I was pushing your wagon for no good reason, wouldn't it be obvious to everyone that I was scum? That's not going to happen because I'm not scum, but if it did I would think you'd be happy to make that trade.
his flip isn't going to change my role PM. I'm town so if he flips town, you are my suspect and if he flips scum I'm still town. If you drive through my mislynch tomorrow after I get Bearbert lynched here, you're either scum or anti-town thinking I'm somehow scum who bussed my whole team if Fire's scumslip is right.
These posts show an inability to see things from my perspective. If he flips town, it makes you town because Bearbert was reluctant to vote you even to save himself. It would mean flipped town genuinely believed you were town. Secondly I believe him flipping scum increases your chance of being scum, so him flipping town must by necessity decrease your chance of being scum. It is obvious that his flip doesn't change your role PM. It just changes what I think your role PM is, since I don't know for sure.
Fro99er wrote:Hey man, if you go down as town, you have my word I'm vote parking on Shaz tomorrow.
At this point if I flip off you and Shaz flips town it'll be even more "evidence" that I'm your "buddy"
This changes my view a little though. It's not a very pro-town attitude to pre-determine your voting patterns. You would be justified in thinking I was more likely to be scum if I helped to lynch a townie. But saying you will vote park is never a good idea.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
@ Davsto
I explained the Spiffeh read swing, so saying it's scummy is just saying that someone's views can't change for any reason ever. Unless you want to actually rebut the reasoning, but it seems pretty clear, and I think most here agree with it.
Voting MarioManiac for something I wouldn't vote Spiffeh for is not scummy either, nobody votes all people for the exact same reasons. That's what meta is about, and it can be established in a few posts sometimes.
Saying I've advocated for a no-lynch is utterly ludicrous.
You've clearly pre-determined that I'm scum before making your vote-post so you really shouldn't have bothered slapping together such a ridiculous case. There is nothing but confirmation bias in there.
VOTE: Fro99er
Yeah, nobody else is going to lynch him, but he's the scum here. For some reason, all it took was a couple people saying "if Bearbert flips town, Shazam is scum" for people to turn against me without a thought, despite the fact that I pushed two scum wagons. If I say "when I flip town, lynch Fro99er", will that one actually happen?-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 3253, Davsto wrote:Wait, is this the only reasoning he ever gives to jump on the tn wagon? Looks like a bus to me.
The post you attempted to quote had more reasoning in it for the tn vote than you quoted. Why did you feel the need to edit some of it out, I wonder? This really makes me question my townread on you. Again, it's trying too hard to fit me into the frame of being scum. I admit that I've done some voting that looked scummy, but you really should be focusing on that if you want to vote me. Instead, you're trying to find something scummy anywhere you can.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 3263, Spiffeh wrote:What does anger at Davsto have ANYTHING to do with your feelings about Fro99er?
Did you notice the word distracted? That's like asking what the screaming kid right next to you has to do with the thesis you're trying to write.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 3266, Davsto wrote:Also, I'm pretty sure Fro99er is town, so I feel my worry yesterday that Me v Fro99er v Bearbert was TvTvT and that scum was just letting it sail past seems about right.
This is quite possibly true, and was one of two possibilities that I had in mind, thus my insistence that a Bearbert town flip would make Fro99er town. I forgot some of that reasoning and stuck my vote on the person I'd wanted dead for a while. My question still stands about whether I could just tell people to lynch my top scumread (once I develop one again) when I flip town. My guess is no.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 3066, Echo Echo wrote:In post 3031, Shazam wrote:My reads are obviously static because I currently don't have time for this game. What I have said is mostly solid. What I haven't said is because I don't have time. I think my wagon is clearly scum driven because Echo's posts clearly demonstrate that I am town. More specifically, VT. Lynch me while I'm catching up if you want to, I'm not going to be fully caught up until Saturday. Just make sure to lynch Fro99er tomorrow.
FYI, you're the weakest of the townreads, according to the VCA. I do however townread you independently of that.
In post 3242, Bearbert D wrote:Bye people. Lynch Shazam!
In post 3243, Echo Echo wrote:Okay. Hope you're right.
Just wanted to point this out because I thought it was weird at the time. Echo, out of the people likely to be on my wagon today, seems the most opportunistic. He goes from townreading me to lynching me just because a townie wants me dead. He even admits that he "hopes" Bearbert is right, not that he actually thinks he is. That's pretty suspicious.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
In post 3279, AxleGreaser wrote:Also @Thread
Ok are we done lynching anyone other than the people I want lynched most?
I don't want to lynch those people. I think Davsto and Fro99er are town, though Davsto less so than Fro99er at this point, because of his really bad case on me. I'm trying to decide between Echo, ika, and you.-
-
Shazam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: July 12, 2015
-
-
-