[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 8786776 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Micro 677: Double Day Unlimited in Wifom City - Town Win - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #28 (isolation #2) » Wed Feb 01, 2017 9:40 am
Postby nydushermain »
Gonna assume this means that the day has begun! Hello fellow townspeople and fellow townees and townsmen and townswomen! Allow me to begin the RTS to say that
Post
Post #37 (isolation #5) » Wed Feb 01, 2017 10:33 am
Postby nydushermain »
So far, according to the wiki, the setup is 2-4 in terms of town wins to scum wins. That's pretty low... Maybe it's just because it's a low sample size but I think if it's representative, it probably shows town reliance on active PRs.
Post
Post #38 (isolation #6) » Wed Feb 01, 2017 10:42 am
Postby nydushermain »
Let's do the math a little bit:
9 People total = 7 town + 2 scum
Let's say we lynch 2 people today and it's a ML
-> 5 town + 2 scum
Night kill
-> 4 town + 2 scum
Lynch 2 People that day and it's a ML = Lose
Lynch 1 Person that day and it's a ML = Lose
Lynch 2 People that day, one hits one is a ML
-> 3 town + 1 scum
Night Kill
-> 2 town + 1 scum
Final 3
If we lynch 1 person today and it's a ML
-> 6 town + 2 scum
Night Kill
-> 5 town + 2 scum*
If we lynch 2 people and it's a ML = lose
If we lynch 1 person and it's a ML
-> 4 town + 2 scum
Night kill
-> 3 town + 2 scum
Final 5
If we go back to *
If we lynch 2 people and one is a ML and one is a hit
-> 4 town + 1 scum
Night kill
-> 3 town + 1 scum
= 2 lynches to hit the last in a final 4
Basically, this seems kind of aimless but what I'm trying to say is that no matter what, it seems like as long as we don't lose right off the bat on day 2, we have 5 lynches at most to find scum, and 3 lynches to hit the first one at least. We pretty much have to decide which route we take and which risks we want to take to try to hit the scum.
I'd argue that finding scum one day 1 is a bit harder, and I'd probably opt to say that we should only lynch one person on day one UNLESS we hit scum #1 and save the rest of the lynches for day 2 and day 3. Even statistically, I think it's beneficial because let's say we're in a final 4 position, we have 2 lynches to find the remaining scum and it's a 50% chance because you're hitting 2 (that math might actually be wrong) in 4. Haven't looked TOO into this yet but the kind of math is there for you and I might have missed scenarios. The only ones that I haven't mentioned are the ones where we win straight up by lynching both scum, and the ones where scum is lynched on day 1. If it gets to that point, we can scrap whatever is in this post and see what our optimal lynch path is.
Post
Post #39 (isolation #7) » Wed Feb 01, 2017 10:49 am
Postby nydushermain »
1. As an addition to post 38, let's say that we took this path:
1. a) Lynch 2 day 1
1. b) Lynch 2 day 2 and one of them hit
1. c) Final 3
1. a) The probability of hitting scum on day 1 is 2/9 and then 2/8
1. b) The probability of hitting scum on day 2 is 2/6 and then 2/5
1. c) Final 3 is a standard 1/3
2. If we take the second path:
2. a) Lynch 1 day 1
2. b) Lynch 2 day 2
2. c) Final 5
2. a) The probability of hitting scum on day 1 is 2/9
2. b) The probability of hitting scum on day 2 is 2/7 and then 2/6
2. c) Final 5 is 2/5 and then 1/3
3. If we take the third path:
3. a) Lynch 1 day 1
3. b) Lynch 2 day 2 and one of them is a hit
3. c) Final 4
3. a) The probability of hitting scum on day 1 is 2/9
3. b) The probability of hitting scum on day 2 is 2/7 and then 2/6
3. c) The probability of hitting scum is 1/2
Post
Post #46 (isolation #11) » Wed Feb 01, 2017 10:56 am
Postby nydushermain »
In post 44, Alisae wrote:It looks like your posting that stuff to just look busy
That's not a bad read (although it's wrong) because I'm doing it out of boredom. I literally posted the above because I'm procrastinating actual work. New setups are exciting, especially when the variables aren't that complicated.
Post
Post #47 (isolation #12) » Wed Feb 01, 2017 10:56 am
Postby nydushermain »
Also, the wiki says that we have a shitty win rate on this set up so I wanted to break it down and see if we could break the game and gain a slight advantage.
Post
Post #78 (isolation #14) » Wed Feb 01, 2017 1:51 pm
Postby nydushermain »
In post 50, TierShift wrote:Agreed in full with the above post. Single votes are better. Plus alisae is scummy. VOTE: alisae
On to the theory. It is imperative that we lynch twice everyday. That gives us 3 mislynches and then we can still win the game. If we lynch only once today, we're done for after 3 mislynches.
The highest amount of lynches is always best in a setup like this. I can do the math if anyone disagrees but that town wants to have as many lynches as possible should be a no-brainer.
Disagree. I agree that the highest amount of lynches is best but 1 lynch today, 2 lynches tomorrow (if we hit scum) gives us 2 lynches in the final day.
2 lynches today, 2 lynches tomorrow (if we hit scum), gives us 1 lynch in the final day.
Either way, it amounts to 5 lynches to hit the 2 scum. It only changes how quickly mylo/lylo hits us. If alisae is actually dead and flips town, we should probably lynch twice today, and lynch twice tomorrow because we don't have as much interactions considering it was such a quick lynch.
Post
Post #79 (isolation #15) » Wed Feb 01, 2017 1:53 pm
Postby nydushermain »
UNVOTE:
I'm pretty sure I have a vote somewhere -_- so I'm gonna just take that off now... I suggest everyone do the same. It's easy to lose track of votes in this game I'm assuming considering what just happened.
Post
Post #81 (isolation #16) » Wed Feb 01, 2017 1:56 pm
Postby nydushermain »
Granted it's useless now since we already lynched (and apparently mislynched? mod pls?), I feel like no one actually read my analysis. You don't have to have read the math because that was just my notes which I put up there in case anyone wanted to take a look at it, but no one really read the analysis part which showed why 1 lynch day 1 was not a bad thing depending on how confident we were on lynching the first scum.
Post
Post #82 (isolation #17) » Wed Feb 01, 2017 1:56 pm
Postby nydushermain »
In post 80, Alisae wrote:Nyd it's too late.
Hammer was accomplished.
Takes 5 to lynch man.
I also have a vote on NM and we have another potential lynch today. Do you have any twilight reads? Probably doesn't matter much but anything super obvious to you?
Post
Post #88 (isolation #20) » Wed Feb 01, 2017 2:04 pm
Postby nydushermain »
Yeah, we have a total of 2 lynches max per day. Day isn't locked. That makes more sense as to why you didn't unvote though but I suggest you do it now.
Post
Post #90 (isolation #21) » Wed Feb 01, 2017 2:05 pm
Postby nydushermain »
In post 58, Alisae wrote:Plus pressuring them right now isn't a bad thing to do...
Now that I'm thinking about it, it could be they are just trying to leave RVS asap...
You nailed it btw. Well... kinda. I was bored so I wanted to just throw content somewhere and see what happened but I guess that's the same as wanting to leave RVS. It just wasn't with the intent of "let's gtfo of RVS"
In the minute amount of time you played this game, you can take solace in knowing you were right on that haha.
Post
Post #91 (isolation #22) » Wed Feb 01, 2017 2:06 pm
Postby nydushermain »
In post 89, Not_Mafia wrote:Votes don't carry over as far as I know, by day I mean phase 1 of the day or whatever the name is
That actually makes sense.
Imagine there were 8 people, meaning 5 to lynch. Let's say person A had 4 votes, and person B had 4 votes. If person A gets hammered, then it would be 4 to lynch and then person B would auto get hammered. That sounds dumb.
In post 50, TierShift wrote:Agreed in full with the above post. Single votes are better. Plus alisae is scummy. VOTE: alisae
On to the theory. It is imperative that we lynch twice everyday. That gives us 3 mislynches and then we can still win the game. If we lynch only once today, we're done for after 3 mislynches.
The highest amount of lynches is always best in a setup like this. I can do the math if anyone disagrees but that town wants to have as many lynches as possible should be a no-brainer.
Disagree. I agree that the highest amount of lynches is best but 1 lynch today, 2 lynches tomorrow (if we hit scum) gives us 2 lynches in the final day.
2 lynches today, 2 lynches tomorrow (if we hit scum), gives us 1 lynch in the final day.
Either way, it amounts to 5 lynches to hit the 2 scum. It only changes how quickly mylo/lylo hits us. If alisae is actually dead and flips town, we should probably lynch twice today, and lynch twice tomorrow because we don't have as much interactions considering it was such a quick lynch.
If we nolynch today, we get 1 lynch the next day and then at 6 people left it's mylo, so we.... nolynch again? to take it to odds
You seem to be assuming we hit scum, right now that plan requires us to hit scum in 1 lynch tomorrow
Nope. We can do it in 2 tomorrow. If we miss twice today, we get to 7 players. NK makes it 6 players so if we miss once, we get to 5, but then we can still lynch a second time and if we hit mafia, we get to final 3.
Post
Post #99 (isolation #24) » Wed Feb 01, 2017 3:03 pm
Postby nydushermain »
I mean, I agree with ali's uncertainty in terms of how many scum are in her wagon.. I think that it was so fast that we can't really tell who was scum based on votes. Both scum could've literally not been in the wagon because they hadn't responded to the game thread in time, who knows.
In post 99, nydushermain wrote:I mean, I agree with ali's uncertainty in terms of how many scum are in her wagon.. I think that it was so fast that we can't really tell who was scum based on votes. Both scum could've literally not been in the wagon because they hadn't responded to the game thread in time, who knows.
What do you think of not mafia?
I think that his lack of content after RVSing to hammer ali is worrisome. He was clearly in the thread reading after his hammer because... well... he responded when I asked him to unvote a while later but he hasn't tried to game solve at all imo. Kinda scummy but I don't think that's enough.
Well if we lynch once today, we get two lynches tomorrow. It really depends on how many chances you think we'll need to hit the first scum. If we are confident, we can do 3 lynches (1 which we've already used), and then do 2 lynches in final 4.
Post
Post #104 (isolation #26) » Wed Feb 01, 2017 3:09 pm
Postby nydushermain »
In post 102, Towns Last Hope wrote:I'm saying if we get to 6 people alive and 1 lynch for the day I'd argue to nolynch
Yeah so that's the thing. So let's say there are 2 scum alive and we have 6 people alive total. That means that there's 4 town vs 2 scum. Yes, it's better to sleep if you want a greater chance at hitting the first scum. However, let's say we do lynch the scum in final 6 and then get down to final 4. We have 2 lynches to find the final scum. So it's a matter of: do you want to have a better chance of lynching scum # 1 or 2?
Post
Post #109 (isolation #28) » Wed Feb 01, 2017 3:56 pm
Postby nydushermain »
What I'm saying is if we end the day instead of lynching today, and we lynch twice tomorrow, we get 2 lynches in final 4. So no matter what, we get 5 lynches, whichever of the two paths we take. Your path gets us a greater chance of lynching mafia number 1, the second path gives us a better chance of lynching mafia number 2. Either way, let's not talk about this anymore. I feel like if we discuss this any further (and it's my fault), scum are going to join in and blend.
In post 51, Alisae wrote:The way I saw it Nyd is overanalysing and just posting numbers that I thought didn't mean much.
I hate this - not prone to an Alisae lynch now tbh.
In post 58, Alisae wrote:Plus pressuring them right now isn't a bad thing to do...
I would have forgiven you more if this was your reason for that vote.
I'm ok with the Alisae lynch. That was my main SR. Just wouldn't have liked it to go that fast and would've liked more reactions.
@NYD: we are using the second lynch. In the wiki, this game has been played 6 times and no one has contemplated using the NL (I read the lynches for all of those games) - I see no reason to follow another order, even if the stats are in mafia favor (this is mostly due to skill rather than planning)
Yeah but I don't think they've done the analysis. Also, 33% town win rate on the wiki... maybe following in their footsteps is not the best thing. Either way, I'm all for second lynch today and two lynches tomorrow.
In post 51, Alisae wrote:The way I saw it Nyd is overanalysing and just posting numbers that I thought didn't mean much.
I hate this - not prone to an Alisae lynch now tbh.
In post 58, Alisae wrote:Plus pressuring them right now isn't a bad thing to do...
I would have forgiven you more if this was your reason for that vote.
I'm ok with the Alisae lynch. That was my main SR. Just wouldn't have liked it to go that fast and would've liked more reactions.
@NYD: we are using the second lynch. In the wiki, this game has been played 6 times and no one has contemplated using the NL (I read the lynches for all of those games) - I see no reason to follow another order, even if the stats are in mafia favor (this is mostly due to skill rather than planning)
How are you reading the people who went on alisae? It appears he's flipping town.
Post
Post #189 (isolation #31) » Fri Feb 03, 2017 4:15 am
Postby nydushermain »
Here's where I'm at. NM's hammer is NAI. You guys are trying to analyze it? Well stop because it's dumb and it's completely hypothetical. He could be this genius pretending to not have known it was a hammer, he could've also very well just meant to fully RVS and accidentally hammered. Who cares? We'll never know until post game. You guys are pushing on someone for something that isn't even a scum tell...
THAT BEING SAID. Here's why I think we should vote for him anyways:
He votes, hammers, and doesn't participate in trying to game solve. If I were in his position, I'd be so annoyed that it even happened and have tried to at least put in a modicum of game solving. I think that he was nervous about the hammer as scum and didn't want to have to deal with the drama of hammering. He was obviously reading the thread because I was having a discussion with alisae or someone and he chimed in with a really quick response when I asked for someone to speak. I think this is scum trying to avoid confrontation. It's an unnatural reaction for town to say absolutely nothing useful when they mishammer someone by accident and are still reading the thread....
Post
Post #197 (isolation #33) » Fri Feb 03, 2017 10:31 am
Postby nydushermain »
In post 192, GuiltyLion wrote:nydush the thing is Not_Mafia often plays like this, as town or scum. He's hilarious and I enjoy playing with him so I say this with love but you're going to have a hard time if you expect to determine his alignment by the amount of useful things he says.
It's not so much that he didn't say useful things, it's more so that he was obviously reading the thread, but he neither reacted in a way that I thought town would react to accidentally hammering, and didn't really contribute much when I was trying to bring people in to interact with alisae in the twilight. I should probably ego search him just in case though... thanks for bringing this up about his meta
Post
Post #284 (isolation #43) » Sat Feb 11, 2017 1:42 am
Postby nydushermain »
I need to VLA for the weekend so I'll see if the mod lets me cuz grad school applications are due T.T but I'd like to note that TS' reason for calling NM scum was horrific and not actually a scum tell. People should look at that if they don't think NM is mafia.
Post
Post #295 (isolation #44) » Mon Feb 13, 2017 2:54 am
Postby nydushermain »
Okay guys, I'm back. I still want to kill Tiershift the mostest but I think that NM is also a good lynch. I think that there's 1 scum in there at most because of how TS went on NM but I think they're both pretty scummy.
TS: the reason he went on NM was because he thought that NM was pretending to not realize that he was hammering? That's BS and not really a scum tell because NM definitely could have done it as town. There's no indication that it was a scum tactic.
NM: still not a fan of how he reacted after the hammer. I would think that a town would be apologetic and at least existent somewhere after killing a town member
In post 298, Lycanfire wrote:Nydus are you saying you believe NM would vote everyone and knowingly hammer as town?
I think that's pretty obviously not what he's saying by the way...
This.
In post 301, TierShift wrote:Okay I'm rereading. Page 1-4: I like TLH putting the focus where it should be, in a relaxed manner. Nyd tries to be the perfect townie.
You literally just saw me in a game as scum. I don't play "perfect townie" as scum. However, thanks for the compliment :3 because I am town this game.
Post
Post #309 (isolation #47) » Tue Feb 14, 2017 8:48 am
Postby nydushermain »
Also, you remember the game where I was actually scum TS? I went hard on the active players and ignored the inactive ones... one of the being you, and the other being RC on d1. I ignored the fuck out of jack, fykus, etc. Maybe meta reads are bad but you not having any memory of my actual scum play when we literally just finished a game together when I was scum is baffling.
Post
Post #310 (isolation #48) » Tue Feb 14, 2017 8:48 am
Postby nydushermain »
I agree though, due to my attempts to scramble in finishing grad school apps, I only posted reads based on my memory of the game before I left, rather then catch up which I'll do in a moment in between classes.
Post
Post #314 (isolation #50) » Tue Feb 14, 2017 9:10 am
Postby nydushermain »
Also, I'm back to being certain that NM is scum. I also think that hiraki is townie, but I'm feeling uneasy with how hiraki defends NM via chainsaw (proper use of terminology?).
I'm caught up and I still think that TS is scummy. I think that what he is pushing NM on is NAI and calling him a backup lynch after saying
Don't at all like the shade throwing/"analysis" at the end there. And the defensive "my vote was rvs" when nobody asked about it
agreed though but you don't think nm is a scummy scumfuck?
is shady as fuck. He should also know how I play scum since we both lived until the end in the game where I actually was scum. This is like a total 180 (I think).
This is page 4 which people can follow along with me. The page prior to this, alisae was "accidentally hammered" by NM and I don't think we'll know whether or not it was an actual intentional hammer until post game. NM hides until I tell him to speak or something along those lines and instead of talking about reads or anything useful, his only contribution is post 89 where he hides in talking about mechanics. He was posting just for the sake of posting without any attempt to game solve.
not sure what the vote count is but I can do this for now, my immediate take here is that I don't like how nyd is suddenly recycling stale points about Martha
nyd I want you to talk about Tier's most recent push on you, do you think it's scum motivated and why or why not?
In post 314, nydushermain wrote:Also, I'm back to being certain that NM is scum. I also think that hiraki is townie, but I'm feeling uneasy with how hiraki defends NM via chainsaw (proper use of terminology?).
I'm caught up and I still think that TS is scummy. I think that what he is pushing NM on is NAI and calling him a backup lynch after saying
Don't at all like the shade throwing/"analysis" at the end there. And the defensive "my vote was rvs" when nobody asked about it
agreed though but you don't think nm is a scummy scumfuck?
is shady as fuck. He should also know how I play scum since we both lived until the end in the game where I actually was scum. This is like a total 180 (I think).
Why is it shady for Tier to push aggressively on N_M and then switch focus here? Town do that all the time
I think that TS should know how I play as scum so I think that it's extremely shady that he has more confidence in voting for me than someone he said was extremely scummy. Also, to answer your question about whether or not his push in scum motivated? I think that him townreading TLH, the only other person really going on me
could
be scum motivated but it could also be him genuinely reading TLH town as town!TS and coincidentally pushing on me. However, it does personally feel like he has some sort of agenda. His town read on TLH was just as lazy as my initial scum read on him.
Post
Post #319 (isolation #53) » Tue Feb 14, 2017 9:20 am
Postby nydushermain »
I've been reading TLH's post and I'll say that I think that TLH comes off as townie for me but this is my first time playing with a hydra in forum mafia and in a video mafia format, they tend to be extremely hard to scum read as either alignment so I'm going to hold off judgement until the future. Would not vote on today though.
Post
Post #322 (isolation #55) » Tue Feb 14, 2017 9:26 am
Postby nydushermain »
I think that the only thing I see being townie from TS was when he said that single votes are better than not and when he ONLY voted on me. If he responds before deadline, I'll consider unvoting him.
Post
Post #326 (isolation #57) » Tue Feb 14, 2017 9:42 am
Postby nydushermain »
In post 171, Lycanfire wrote:i think the fake hammer needs to be examined more because it felt like it was covering the wagon
In post 265, Lycanfire wrote:Sorry I've already read the game three times I didn't feel like there was much more I could say beyond that I was willing to vote for NM if TLH wasn't going to work.
I didn't like how GL took a hard angle on my case v. TLH when they supposedly had a scumread on Martha.
Hiraki appeared and asked the same questions I was asked twice over
Like, I'll go over it re: 239 just in the case that my word choice made sense in my head but not others.
1) I think it was indicative of someone wanting the Alisae wagon to look chaotic
2) I don't think the posthumous hammer is necessarily scum
3) (2, cont) with the assumption of double scum on the wagon, I think the fake hammer is AI. Continuing that line of thought I think it's most likely NM to necessitate point 1.
I get the impression from Hiraki's post 239 that they appeared to want to work with myself but didn't seem to care to do the same with NM or TLH. I think the triple vote is pretty dishonest here. Who exactly do you want to lynch today?
I'm liking lycan as town here. In particular, I like how he was told that VCA on alisae was not necessary information as we've already talked about it but proceeded to talk about it anyways. Not sure if I agree with points 1) and 3) though but his reads are easy to follow.
I'm ego searching you because people trying to be this intentionally annoying usually end up being town. If you've done this as scum, even once in 100 scum games, this vote is firmly planted for the rest of the game.
Post
Post #331 (isolation #60) » Tue Feb 14, 2017 9:51 am
Postby nydushermain »
UNVOTE: TS UNVOTE: Martha
I think that TS has a good point about single votes. Let's all kill NM together. Also, I think I'm also tending towards TS being scum because his activity has been so lackluster this game, with very little questioning compared to what I am used to but it might have just been because he was the IC in the game I played with him (and he got a concussion during the happenings of this game).