Mini 1894: DBZ Abridged Mafia - Arrival To Namek (Game Over)
-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
So what your saying is: write off the dragon ball mechanic and never let it happen.In post 25, Almost50 wrote:
Oh, I'm sorryIn post 21, Not Chara wrote:weeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.
Almost: i don't know! and after i joined to play with you... it brings a tear to my eye.
But it's probably bc the last 2 Kuroi games we were in as a hydra, so I subconsciously thought we were playing with the hydra account.
But now I do have a thought: This dragonballs thing makes the game potentially very swingy. I think we all should keep passing them around if we get more than one just to prevent their potential accumulation with scum. Like, it should be ok for any one player to keep only ONE dragon ball at a time. Thoughts?
It occurs to me that The Thing I Can Do is obvious enough that the mod had to have anticipated it. I need to reread the mechanics real quick.-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
I was asking in the sense of whether the mechanics are repeated and if there is insight to be gained about how to handle said mechanics.In post 46, Imperium wrote:Socrates, it is a sequel game and the previous one isn't required reading.
Vote: MariaR-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
Why?In post 18, Not Chara wrote:oh and Kuroi: very interesting mechanic with the Dragonballs. i look forward to sabotaging all attempts to gather seven of them.-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
Scum like to tell townies not to use unique game mechanics, thinking that they will look protown by advocating caution, but really all they do is betray their own greed.
You didn't actively call it scummy to collect dragon balls, so it's not the full tell, but this is a good starting place.
VOTE: not chara-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
Well no, nc said they were going to actively sabotage collecting dragons balls on the first page.In post 82, Almost50 wrote:
I said it first, so why NC and not me?In post 80, Socrates wrote:Scum like to tell townies not to use unique game mechanics, thinking that they will look protown by advocating caution, but really all they do is betray their own greed.
You didn't actively call it scummy to collect dragon balls, so it's not the full tell, but this is a good starting place.
VOTE: not chara
Two, your suggestion did earn a squint from me. Maybe you failed to notice. But my feelings on you re:Tywin mirror Nacho's, whereas NC only has this.
I find annoying that people think about the mechanics only in terms of how they can be used directly, not in terms of how they can be a vector for scumhunting. Scum can do a lot, but they can do very little without leaving a paper trail if we approach it correctly. I will have more to say on this day 2.-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
I already did. Its quoted in the post directly above yours.In post 122, Alisae wrote:hmmmmmmm...
VOTE: Socrates
I would really like you to explain the scum motivation behind saying this on page 1:
Because I'm not seeing it.In post 18, Not Chara wrote:oh and Kuroi: very interesting mechanic with the Dragonballs. i look forward to sabotaging all attempts to gather seven of them.-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
You'll note that I didn't immediately jump on her, but asked her to elaborate. If she said it was just a first page joke, I would have shrugged and let it go, but she didn't and went with the classic "scum can manipulate this mechanic so we shouldn't use it" argument that scum themselves love to make. They love to make the same argument about masslcaims and such, too.In post 124, Alisae wrote:I need to learn how to read. Give me a second.
/me takes a second.
Kay heres the thing. I don't think scum!NC gets anything out of writing that post. Granted town!NC gets nothing out of it either. Like that post seems really NAI to me. Especially considering it's page 1, we're still in RVS, so I don't really see how they're trying to prevent scumhunting from happening on page 1?
I feel like if anything scum are most likely to jump on that post rather then town.
As I said, it wasnt the full tell, because they didn't check the final checkbox of calling it outright scummy, but I feel better about this vote than anywhere else at this moment.
I've caught scum this way before.-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
Should I be voting him instead of NC?In post 125, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Any simplistic wand-waving ball policy proposal the kind of which Almost50 made is almost assuredly made by scum.-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
Cool. I still want a vote count.In post 142, Albert B. Rampage wrote:
Yes, I'm moderately confident that he is scum.In post 128, Socrates wrote:
Should I be voting him instead of NC?In post 125, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Any simplistic wand-waving ball policy proposal the kind of which Almost50 made is almost assuredly made by scum.
I see where you're coming from, do you see where I'm coming from? or am I barking up the wrong tree?-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
Fascinating. Remember this specific vote count and the pages leading up to it tomorrow if I'm no longer around.In post 196, KuroiXHF wrote:
"I would have been here sooner but I was too busy plowing your mother!"
Notes:- Trying out the new format. Let me know your thoughts[/color]
(expired on 2017-04-04 12:55:00) until the end of Day One.
With thirteen alive, it takes seven to lynch.
mod: can the mafia pass balls when they are tied for leading wagon?-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
You misunderstand the question. I'm asking if they can still do it in the case of a tie.
-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
Why does the ABR wagon exist?In post 212, MariaR wrote:
Why the ABR wagon compared to the other ones?In post 210, Socrates wrote:I was going to say something else, but I forgot.
The ABR wagon almost certainly has scum on it.-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
You haven't tweaked to the reason why I am looking for signs of wagon manipulation. That's fine, it just makes your condescension all the more toothless.In post 221, MariaR wrote:
2 of those votes on ABR are RVS votes the other is naked. Your assessment is strange. I would think you would know this if you were reading.In post 217, Socrates wrote:Oh should I? When not one member of the wagon has said word one about why he is scum?
I am leading the NC wagon, ISO me and see why.
ABR asserted why he is voting Almost, as has Majiffy. I must admit that Zefeind almost seems like he's stalling, tbh.
There is a clear contrast here.-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
Okay, I lied, I'm not sleeping anytime soon, so I might as well catch up.
Let me put it this way:In post 248, Not Chara wrote:alright, scratch what i said earlier.
i'm townreading the intent of 121, but i dislike that Socrates's push on me so far is based on this tell that they've said twice isn't complete because i haven't scumread anyone for the dragonballs, just given my opinion.
for one, zefiend has come to exactly the same conclusion, and Socrates hasn't mentioned it. they've caught scum this way before, but 2/3 players with the same opinion haven't even been spoken to. if there was real concern, why isn't the same care being taken? Socrates only mentions Almost after he brings up this exact problem.
and reading 121 again, there's the main issue. Almost is fine because Socrate's agrees that Almost's reasoning is towny. therefore, the mechanics tell isn't that important. zefiend gets a side-eye for stalling in 217, but no mention of the mechanics tell. the reply to Almost sounds like a retroactive excuse.
so in the end it just looks like my post caught Socrates's attention as something they could push safely, instead of the tell being the cause.
Player A does something you consider to be moderately scummy.
Player B does something you consider to be moderately scummy and something you consider to be moderately towny.
Who do you vote?
And no, I did NOT bring up Almost only after he mentioned it. As I told HIM, I did in fact voice issue with his suggestion. And you are ignoring the part where I was openly discussing joining the Almost wagon.
As for Zefiend, Yeah, the mechanics tell ties into the stalling. That's one of the things he seemed to be stalling with. I don't like him. I suppose I should have made that more clear.
I also haven't been beating this drum too hard because I had been specifically waiting for you to respond.
I do find your act of talking yourself from a townread into a scumread on me interesting. It's precisely one of those little things I myself like to do as scum precisely because I know it tends to draw townreads from other players, so whenever I see this kind of stuff I have to ask myself if it's theater. But that kind of sophisticated scumplay doesn't fit well with committing such a short-sided tell.
Oh, and I do want to see Imperium respond to you, if they didn't.-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
This is my third game back after a 6 year absence. (Secret: this wasn't my first account, though)In post 336, Clumsy Phoenix wrote:Socrates, do you have any experience with this player list?
I can't remember if I ever played with Nacho or Albert back in the day, but I do recognize their names and I read a lot of games I didn't play in back in those days.
That said, my first game back was with Nacho, so I do have experience with him.-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
Oh, I noticed, and I was hoping he would say something, but his next post (unlessIn post 349, Clumsy Phoenix wrote: Why was this never followed up on? This question was asked and (unless I'm missing a post), never answered nor re-asked.Imissed a post) is just now, jumping on you.
I would still like him to answer, though I honestly don't expect much.-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
Are you still happy with your vote on them?In post 439, Alisae wrote:
tbh, looking back at it, I really do not know what I was trying to accomplish with that.In post 418, Imperium wrote:Liked the rest of the post, don't understand what you're saying with this point.
Saying that get scumread frequently is them trying too hard to pretend to be town...?-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
It's not about before or after, it's that he just flatly ignored people talking about voting him while posting about other things. It struck me as weird. It might be his style to not bother addressing that kind of stuff, though.In post 426, Imperium wrote:
I didn't think anything of it in that regards. Why was he supposed to mention it before talking to Vifam?In post 213, Socrates wrote:Imperium, how do you feel about Almost popping up to say some stuff to Vifram on the very page people were talking about wagoning him without any acknowledgement ? Unless I missed a post.
I thought the post to vifam was a bit weird, but there are several awkward posters this game and it reads like a rather awkward stern warning, which is whatever, but I don't know why he had to acknowledge others talking about him.-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
Kay. I really want to get more out of them, but I don't want to jump to the conclusion that they are avoiding the thread.In post 442, Almost50 wrote:
As of late, YES. Unpredictable schedule I suppose or something like that.In post 440, Socrates wrote:Question to players that would know: Is NotChara typically a low volume poster?-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
I know. It's my fault, not yours. Our reads have seemingly no overlap, yet I don't see much of a scum motivation to your posting, so my focus keeps drifting elsewhere. and if I didn't make conscious note of it, I would just keep ignoring you.In post 360, Tywin Lannister wrote:
P-edit: Socrates: if I was scum, that would be a good thing, but since I'm not, it's bad. I can try to keep posts short, but at least pretend to read the non-wall posts.
For example, Sharizo's pity party entrance is indeed lame, as Alisae put it, but it's the kind of thing I see from bad townies more than I see from scum, and Alisae more or less confirmed that it wasn't totally out of character for them.
This doesn't add up to a town read, mind you, and I see other townies fall for that red herring enough that I don't really question you jumping on him for it.
(If anything, that behavior does deserve a good slap because no player of any alignment has any business being so defeatist.)-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
Our assessment of Almost differed purely on how difficult we felt it would be to fake.In post 446, Desperado wrote:
wrong answerIn post 440, Socrates wrote:His scumread on me is still nonsense, though.
Not agreeing with my case on NC isn't a good reason to scum read me.
Your last point is some links without any grounding whatsoever.
A nonsense read.-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
Could you elaborate on what parts of your direct interactions with him furthered your scumread? Or just link me to the correct post, I probably just missed it.In post 445, Alisae wrote:
There was other stuff I pointed out in that post plus my interactions with them so I'm happy with it, but I could always join you back on NC.In post 441, Socrates wrote:
Are you still happy with your vote on them?In post 439, Alisae wrote:
tbh, looking back at it, I really do not know what I was trying to accomplish with that.In post 418, Imperium wrote:Liked the rest of the post, don't understand what you're saying with this point.
Saying that get scumread frequently is them trying too hard to pretend to be town...?-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
When I pointed out that the ABR wagon had no substance to it and she implied the other wagons were bad and the ABR votes were just RVS and I'm clearly not reading the thread.In post 422, Imperium wrote:
I don't disagree with your intuition, but I'm not sure what you're talking about wrt the condescension itself.In post 353, Socrates wrote:MariaR reminds me of UncertainKitten. My intuition is that Scum!Maria would only condescend to me the way she did if she knew I was on the wrong trail, so I'd be surprised if she was scum WITH Not Chara.-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
Further elaboration.In post 454, Desperado wrote:there's no huff and puff
what reaction did you expect a handwave and discredit to engender?
Or nothing, if it wasn't actually an important read to you.
But it seemingly is, and you seem insulted that I cared little.
Huff and Puff.-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
I like that they stepped back from looking at me specifically and looked at the followers on the wagon, something I had been watching for myself and exactly what they should be doing as town. Imperium was not particularly clear on why they voted NC in the first place, and I don't believe ever specified how they felt about my own read of NC, so this interaction between the two was what I was hoping to see.In post 525, Alisae wrote:Socrates what do you make of NC's latests posts?
I had been lingering on NC for as long as I had because I wanted to ensure they were not just waiting for me to get distracted by a shiny object and go away, and getting independent confirmation that their activity level was not unusual went a long way towards alleviating that particular concern.
My suspicion will linger, but I'm now happy to move on to my next place of interest.-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
VOTE: mariaR
She has been flatly dismissive of most of this game, jumped on the easiest vote possible, and has been active lurking with panache.
And this post:
reads to me as "townie slap fight! Wheeeeeeee!"In post 457, MariaR wrote:*eats popcorn* this is getting good-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
Oh, no need to shy away from this, it's the crux of my concern here.In post 539, MariaR wrote:(Input self meta on how I love being scum and hate being town wifom here)
What is it that you enjoy about playing scum?
Because I put myself in the shoes of a hypothetical Scum!Maria, and I see someone with nothing to do.
You've got all these townies with their back and forths and their sorting reads and it's all so droll, but they are all just walking around in circles sniffing each others asses and haven't even really looked your way. But you have no reason to challenge the status quo, so you find yourself just sitting there.
Bored.-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
But what do you do when the town is ignoring you? Do you like to go "tee hee I'm going see how far I can push it before these stupid fucks catch on!"?
A lot of your posting feels like a cry for attention, to be honest.
As far as twisting words, it's good to note that you are self conscious about the act. Many scum tell themselves that their rhetoric is rock solid and that they are making perfectly sound observations that happen to be wrong. I look at the way you just interacted with Desperado and go "yep, that fits."-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
Note that Majiffy is making a holistic argument about which he is encouraging players to examine and see for themselves. He named a few examples, and it would be nice if he named more, but he wasn't asking people to take his word for it.
Tywin, you yourself admitted that you are being too wordy with your posts, you should hardly act surprised when a player goes the next logical step of accusing them words as being fluff. And please stop using the term OMGUS, you seem to misunderstand what that meaningless buzzword issupposedto refer to.
It does not refer to a player simply scumreading someone who scumreads them, it refers to instances of players using the FACT that someone is scumreading them and making a (to their perspective) bad argument for that read as further justification TO scumread someone.
So yes, the only person here who that term might theoretically apply to is you, Tywin. Good thing OMGUS isn't actually a reliable scumtell.-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
Does he? This isn't the first time he accused someone not following him as being the obvious scum buddy.In post 637, Alisae wrote:Tywin you know better.-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
In post 706, Clumsy Phoenix wrote:This head thinks Tywin is looking worse and worse as this goes on. It might be pot calling kettle black and all, but desp does seem to be sidelining and doesn't look good to me as a result. Clumshead isn't at work but idk where he's at.
-Shaziro
Ah I'm doing fine thanks for asking.In post 708, Clumsy Phoenix wrote:
Right here how ya doing?In post 700, Socrates wrote:Hey Clumsy, where you at?
-Shaziro
P-Edit- because we are both awesome?
Where do you feel like moving your vote now that the player you sheeped moved on?-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
There's lying and the there's having self-delusions about the strength of your own argumentation.
I find the dichotomy between Majiffy complaining about people bending over backwards to TR Tywin at the same time that Tywin is complaining about how everyone is suddenly scumreading him amusing.
Frankly I am more inclined to scumread Tywin and town read Maj over their exchange, but only slightly. And if I was literally forced to pick between the two, I would pick Tywin. Luckily I don't have to.
Vifram voiced concerns that scum were going to take advantage of their argument, but the only person who seems to have actually taken the bait is CP.
I wish Almost didn't jump on Maria as fast as he did. It would have been better to wait and see if she let the vote linger.
Imperium needs a prod.-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
I realized I quoted this but didn't say what I meant to say.In post 706, Clumsy Phoenix wrote:This head thinks Tywin is looking worse and worse as this goes on. It might be pot calling kettle black and all, but desp does seem to be sidelining and doesn't look good to me as a result. Clumshead isn't at work but idk where he's at.
-Shaziro
Please to be distinguishing between looking "worse" and looking "scummy".-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
He elaborates in his ensuing conversation with Desperado along that page. That's what he meant by "start here".In post 854, Albert B. Rampage wrote:
What do you mean, ty majiffy? He linked you to a post that contained nothing more than a vote. No explanation. Did you even read his link?In post 840, MariaR wrote:ty Majiffy :3
I certainly hope his read has developed in some way since then, since that was awhile ago.-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009
-
-
Socrates Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: October 9, 2009