This is my first game of Mafia. Ever.In post 6, Malakittens wrote:
I'm going to start off with a friendly IC question:
How much mafia experience do you have?
Reserving vote until I have developed some reads.
This is my first game of Mafia. Ever.In post 6, Malakittens wrote:
I'm going to start off with a friendly IC question:
How much mafia experience do you have?
OK, that actually makes a lot more sense. My vote is between Hashtagselfie and Mafia Moderator for previous reasons stated. I am going to edge for Hashtag because I'm not actually sure if Mafia moderator is taking part or if s/he is just lurking for now and assessing the situation. Hashtag has provided a couple of posts and I would like to see a little more from him.In post 49, Malakittens wrote:Yes, it's a slow start.
I'm not sure if holding your vote until others have posted will really encourage posting. Moving your vote to apply pressure is probably the better way to go rather than let it idle.
Ah, hello there. I voted for you due to your inactivity. What do you think about that?In post 54, HashtagSELFIE wrote:I'm new, but I'm not stupid. I miscounted the votes on page one and accidentally put Mora at L-1. When he pointed that out, I retracted my vote.In post 31, Xayzeck wrote:I won't hide behind RVS for putting you at L-2. You had a wagon, and I jumped on for people to question me. You wanted to get out of RVS, and I wanted to get out of RVS. It's great that you picked up on it.
This is hiding behind RVS, putting you at L-1 for that matter.
OK, so your very first post was to vote for somebody, who you had no 'clues' on, who already had 3 votes I believe. Did you not read the thread before posting?I'm not sure that voting for someone because of their inactivity is a good or smart approach, but since you seem to think that's a legitimate reason worth voting for, there's really noting I can personally do about it. I'm holding off my vote until I can gather more clues. Until then,sir.
The game appeared to get serious very quickly then.In post 58, HashtagSELFIE wrote:Like I said, I miscounted the votes when I read the thread and we were in RVS. When the game got serious, I took my vote back. Did you miss that?In post 57, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:OK, so your very first post was to vote for somebody, who you had no 'clues' on, who already had 3 votes I believe. Did you not read the thread before posting?I'm not sure that voting for someone because of their inactivity is a good or smart approach, but since you seem to think that's a legitimate reason worth voting for, there's really noting I can personally do about it. I'm holding off my vote until I can gather more clues. Until then,sir.
In addition, are you interested in furthering the game? The more you, and everybody else holds back, the less information there is available.
Yeah well I don't see you badgering anyone else about this. I don't want to go around randomly accusing people outside of RVS. There are people who are 'holding back' even more than I am. Why aren't you pressing them?"
I can't pinpoint why, but I dislike everything about this post. I don't know what it is, it just reads wrong.Ah! Maybe weird, not exclusively British. On other sites (not mafia) I've been on it stands for Full of Shit.
I apologise for accusing you of insulting me - I shall try harder in future to assume the best rather than jump to the wrong conclusion.
Thank you for the lesson. I can see how that would work. I will bear that in mind in future.
Put it in the dumb newbie category.
Because I think had he been new to the thread, with that being his first post, he may have posted some of his opinions/thoughts on what had happened so far. With him posting nothing at all, it appears that he has been reading the thread and any opinions/thoughts he has he is keeping to himself for the time being. It's just a hunch.In post 76, Malakittens wrote:How does an one liner voting a no lynch gives you an impression that the thread has been followed by Mafia Mod. I'm not really seeing that, but I do agree the activity is bad and we need to see more, hence, me asking to contribute more than what he has.
Yeah, I have a few early reads but I am unwilling to share at the moment due to lack of activity and lack of thoughts/reads posted by pretty much every person in this thread.
You might as well have completely ignored the question I posed to you.
What stuff have I said I am doing?In post 85, Shinobi wrote:Both of you are being scummy. I want you both to sit down and actually write about what you think is happening right now.
I really,reallydon't like the fact that BBT says he's doing stuff and then gives us no information whatsoever. If you're town, you need to be as open with your reads as possible rather than sitting back and picking at each other and trying to just poke holes in arguments. Having a steady flow of contribution is exactly what town needs right now, not...Whatever this back-and-forth is supposed to be.
I could almost say the exact same thing for Moratorium right now. You're being intentionally obtuse and giving the town nothing to work with. How are we supposed to solve the game if you don't talk to us? We can't figure out your alignment if you say nothing.
Both of you are being scummy right now. If you're town, you need to stop that shit and actually keep discussion going rather than posting one-liners that ultimately accomplish nothing.
OK, majority of that makes sense. Except for me clamming up, I haven't clammed up, I have been honest. I'm going to provide my reads, I have a horrible feeling this will backfire hence my hesitation in posting.In post 91, Shinobi wrote:
It does. It actually matters quite a bit, and I'm going to explain why.
The traits you have been exhibiting so far (inquisitiveness, openness with information, concern with the lack of activity) are extremely pro-town traits. The issue is that, all of a sudden:
You clam up for no reason whatsoever. The mafia has a huge incentive to lurk right now, what with the abysmal amount of activity in the thread. Therefore, if you look active but ultimately accomplish nothing (which is entirely possible at this point, considering that you don't want to give us information) it concerns me. Looking active and accomplishing nothing is scummy, and keeping town in the dark is scum's job.Yeah, I have a few early reads but I am unwilling to share at the moment
This is why I'm pressuring you so hard for reads. There's literally no reason in the world you wouldn't give them at this point, because we have next to no information to work with as it stands.Give us your reads and stop being obtuse. This should not take an entire page to extract from you.
I think you're town based on a couple of things. I feel like you were pressuring me because you genuinely wanted some information and you seem just as determined as I am to get this thread moving and start getting some information.In post 94, Shinobi wrote:Alright, now we're getting somewhere.
What exactly made you think I was town? You say a couple posts back, but I want to know which ones made you think I was town and what your reasoning is behind that.
Is there anything behind "gut-feeling" reads? Did you like a specific post they made or the way they approached the game? Or did you just kinda wing it and guess that they were town?
(Though your read on MM is a little...odd. You say it's a gut read and then provide reasoning as to why he's scummy [which he is], which is the exact opposite of a gut read. Lol.)
Can you provide me with some evidence where I have stated that I would like to lynch all lurkers?In post 99, Moratorium wrote: BBT, it's similar to Wolfy, it isn't the "I'm going to concentrate on all Lurkers in this game so it looks like I'm scumhunting" thing, or the point Shinobi made about you being a tease with your reads... it's a particular post that I don't like, where you declare that you "have probably been the most active person in this thread", which feels like a strange attempt to clear yourself and push the Lynch all Lurkers Strawman's Guide to Mafia.
Do you have any reads/thoughts that you would like to share? You've been a little quiet only really posting to defend yourself.In post 107, Xayzeck wrote:Shinobi, what's your read on Mora?
Why is Mala your weakest townread? What does nullscum mean?In post 109, Xayzeck wrote:I've got townreads on most of the people here. Weakest townread would be Mala, nullscum would be Selfie and Mafia
Hmm, OK.In post 111, Xayzeck wrote:Because everyone else has towntold more than she has?
Nullscum means somewhere between a null read and a scum read.
Prods and replacements make sense. If this is going to be done, it needs to be done ASAP because we need time for the new players to come in and post.In post 114, Moratorium wrote:A newbie game where three of the newbies are not contributing is a game that needs prods and replacements, not lynches.
I read it as either strong newbie paralysis syndrome, or lack of interest (newbies often don't realize how long-winded forum games tend to be, and aren't prepared for the participation level required or the length of deadlines).
They can't all three be scum.
Just replace them. Analyzing replacements is often lucrative.Inevitable Future Question wrote:So, what, you think we should just let them skate by? Don't you think we should pressure them with votes?
There is a quote button you can use to back up this claim. Provide me with some evidence.In post 118, Moratorium wrote:It's all you talk about.In post 116, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Mora, you accused me of seeking out to lynch lurkers and I asked you to provide some evidence for this claim. You either missed my question, or completely ignored it.
That's because you just made your first mistake. You have now changed from I want to "lynch lurkers" to "It's all I talk about". They are two very different things.In post 121, Moratorium wrote:I have no desire to provide you with evidence that all you talk about is lurkers. I will leave it up to the remaining players to decide whether my refusal to submit to your demands therefore somehow correlates to you not constantly bringing up lurkers.
I have not spoke about lynching lurkers, you have fabricated the link between talking about lurkers and lynching lurkers from thin air with no evidence to back up your claim.In post 123, Moratorium wrote:Here's some more fuel for your fire.
Maybe~~~.... Hang on, I know this gonna be complex.... Maaaaaybe.... It's all you talk about because it's what you want to do.
This is good. It gives us another perspective and some more information to work with.In post 133, Wolfy wrote:Ok – for what little it’s worth…
Leaning town
BlueBloodedToffee– it looks, from my very limited experience, like active scum hunting from a newbie. If he was an experienced player I might not be reading it so strong.
Moratorium– looks like active scum hunting. Putting pressure on people (Xayzeck, BBT) and getting reactions. He is an experienced player though so he could just be fooling a dumbass like me… that’s why it’s only leaning.
Shinobi– looks like active scum hunting to me. Lots of pro town questioning and trying to get people working together.
No read
HashtagSELFIE
thatguy2
Leaning scum
Malakittens– Nothing specifically scummy – just not enough pro town activity. I expect (and have seen in games read through) much more pro town activity from the IC when they are town. Need to find some time to look through some of Mala’s games.
Xayzeck– was very active defending himself when Mora was pushing. Not a lot of other pro-town activity. Nothing definite – this is mostly a gut feel.
Mafia Moderator– gut feel. He doesn’t post anything useful to town.
Not sure I've added any real value here but it's probably a worthwhile exercise for everybody to go through.
It's going to be difficult to disprove his claim, I still can't quite believe it. I really want to see his reasoning behind that claim.In post 149, Wolfy wrote:UNVOTE:
Taking the claim at face value without evidence to the contrary.
More reading and thinking to do...
I'm sorry, have I missed something? Does Wolfy's agreement with me not bother you?In post 153, Moratorium wrote:Your certainty that those are the only two options bothers me.In post 150, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:It's going to be difficult to disprove his claim, I still can't quite believe it. I really want to see his reasoning behind that claim.In post 149, Wolfy wrote:UNVOTE:
Taking the claim at face value without evidence to the contrary.
More reading and thinking to do...
If we don't have a doctor, he is as good as dead. If we do have a doctor, it makes an easy kill for the scum because it's obvious what the doctor has to do.
Yeah, that's the feeling I got from it. It was just too short and to the point to be anything else. I could well be wrong, but that's my gut feeling right now.In post 169, Xayzeck wrote:are you serious?In post 168, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:As soon as he posted "I'm not Mafia", it was obvious he was town.
I'm not sure what you're expecting from that?In post 177, Moratorium wrote:You two are scum, aren't you?
Yes. I openly stated in my reads when I posted them that I was leaning towards scum. I had a very hard time reading him in the beginning but for reasons stated in my read, I am leaning towards scum right now. Nothing has happened in the past few days to change my mind.In post 187, Xayzeck wrote:does that mean you're scumreading him?In post 183, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Less likely to be you based on my read so far though.
Wasn't what you? I don't understandIn post 193, Moratorium wrote:Wasn't this me?In post 190, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:In addition, after I gave a scum-read on him, he proceeded to say he had a scum-read on myself because I pointed out that "I was probably the most active player in this game". Since that reasoning, he hasn't let go.
Shinobi has been fence-sitting for a while.
In post 190, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:In addition, after I gave a scum-read on him, he proceeded to say he had a scum-read on myself because I pointed out that "I was probably the most active player in this game". Since that reasoning, he hasn't let go.
No, I'll clear this up. I meant after I gave a scum-read on you (Mora), you (Mora) proceeded to give myself a scum-read a few posts later with the reason being because I pointed out that I had probably been the most active player, this makes me scummy. Since then, you have not given up on me, from what was a pretty weak read in the first place.In post 195, Moratorium wrote:Is post 190 a description of Shinobi?
That is a really good article and would be an excellent choice of article to follow if you were scum. Do you need a step-by-step guide on how to play the game? That looks mighty suspicious to me. It does however explain your style of play.In post 212, Moratorium wrote:http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?tit ... em_Lynched
This is the school I subscribe to, though I admit to being nowhere near as effective as I've seen Albert B. Rampage be with scumhunting in the past.
What's a BP and what does IOS mean?In post 214, Malakittens wrote:
These two posts arealmostexactly the same in reads, anyone want to guess why?
~
Also, we should stop the whole setup discussion. We can either have a doc or a BP. Most likely the latter as, the doc setup is more rarely seen than the BP, but both have equal chances of appearing.
If we had a cop; there would be a CC from at least the active players. The only two who could still be a cop would be Selfie or ThatGuy2.
~
Also, the more I read BBT and Wolfy's ISO's back to back the more I see similar posts by them. Ugh, makes me believe there's a chance one is scum, but I need more time to figure out which.
Do you believe MM's claim?In post 237, Malakittens wrote:
It's not even anything to do with being an IC for me to want to CC.
A CC means confsscum Day 1 lynch which helps because the numbers are pretty good and you have a few extra chances for mislynches, in case you need them, down the road. You can gleam reactions from the CC to use interactions to catch the second scum. It also forces the second scum to take a certain path: 1) bus 2) ignore or 3) try to lynch the actual cop.
Also:
To the part two (really only applies to newbie games or open setups), but depending on how the nightkill goes the town has just as much information as the other scum based on the setup.
Hmm, OK.In post 239, Malakittens wrote:Considerin' there has been no CC, yes.
Also why didn't you answer my previous question?
In post 217, Malakittens wrote:Also, Wolfy, did JS ever replied to you in regards to me?
Am gonna go ahead and assume this was it?
Poor reasoning.In post 245, Malakittens wrote:I explained that w/o the two other players it's making it harder to read them.In post 243, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:@Mala - You still haven't provided any reads either. Care to contribute?
I'm getting a vibe that at least one of {BBT and Wolfy} are scum. Leaning towards former than latter.
Also I'm still liking Xayz for scum~
This.
What about his exchange with me made you think he was town?In post 250, Xayzeck wrote:Town, every since the exchange with BBTIn post 244, Moratorium wrote:Xayzeck, what's your view of Shinobi?
I can see those things, for those reasons stated in my last updated read; Shinobi is town. That is probably your first real contribution to this thread...and it's taken 11 pages. You don't need to do huge wall of text posts, but you do need to be posting providing thoughts, asking questions, actively seeking for information; if you're town.In post 252, Xayzeck wrote:Coaching and townvibes
I think you guys are asking for details for my reads which I cannot provide. I don't do huge long wall posts going through every line saying why I think someone is town or scum. The way Shinobi interacted with you felt more town motivated than scum motivated, therefore I read him as town. For example, asking you to post reads. Given low content, and his persistence in pulling reads out of you instead of letting you conceal them and leave the town empty, has town motivation it.
You should be able to see these things too.