We have a member who self-hammered. Of course we deserve to lose.In post 5613, Save The Dragons wrote: Town deserves the L here
Amnesiac Mafia: The Movie! That's a Wrap!
-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
Sorry it was a slip. I still type it by habit and had prior to that managed to catch it each time. Will try to avoid it happening again.In post 5618, Thestatusquo wrote: Please don't use the L word.Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
There is a possibility that I'm just a language nerd and only I would care that the scripts all appear to have a naming convention ... except for the two that nobody but kuribo/ircher have "seen".Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
Nah it's okay. If there were a naming convention, adding the definite article to a person's name still doesn't line it up with the rest of them.In post 5636, kuribo wrote:
THE ROMEOIn post 5635, Drixx wrote: There is a possibility that I'm just a language nerd and only I would care that the scripts all appear to have a naming convention ... except for the two that nobody but kuribo/ircher have "seen".
THE JULIET
want me to get even more specific about the role pm for fucks sakeGet to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
It matters if the "Romeo" and "Juliet" roles never existed, and you made up details about them that don't line up with literally every other script.In post 5637, kuribo wrote: And it's stupid as shit anyway because SCUM CAN GET THE PMS they just can't get the role
knowing the flavor doesn't do SHIT to prove or disprove anything in this setupGet to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
Interesting. This is "the Romeo" of this production.In post 5642, Thestatusquo wrote: It's been a long time since I've been involved in theatre but I believe I have heard the term "the romeo" and "the juliet" to refer to a plays main romantic leads before.
Not sure though.Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
That actually scratches that particular itch I've had for awhile. I still think we're in a 4 scum game, which means today is ELO.
The "up" side of setting Ircher/Kuribo/TSQ aside as probably town, along with PB, is that I know my own role and if we're in a 4 scum game it's literally solved. The "down" side is that right now I think the folks who matter are poised to rope me, which would end the game as a loss.Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
I think the fact that the scum team chose to kill the claimed caterer every day the could should indicate to us that they have little to work with beyond their ability to kill us. That's primarily the reason I'm assuming 4 at this time. I also felt 4 was likely earlier in the game due to how I saw the power level at that time.In post 5652, Frozen Angel wrote:
we have absolutely no clue about the scum utility in this setup at this time but town power roles cant be removed cause of design and this is extremely town favored + all amnesiac power roles thrown in setup if we believe commuter vig tracker JKIn post 5650, GuyInFreezer wrote:
Yeah but lovers are not as strong of a role as mason pair due to nightkill risk. That’s why I’m saying lovers aren’t that strong to warrant 4-men scumteam.In post 5647, Frozen Angel wrote: cause they say they had a neighborhood and scum them wouldn't have them so they are confirmed to each other. they cant be scum unless if both are
it makes the setup look extremely town sided on surface level, so I think assuming 4 scum isn't that far fetched
Does anyone have a chart of all the claims? I think it would help visually to see it and would prefer not to try and go through all the pages again while working, so hoping someone was more responsible than me along the way.Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
I hate it when people become IC or conftown, and then they just want to coast on that and don't want to actually put in the effort of analyzing the game to bring home a win. Right now I get the distinct impression that the "conftown" bunch are just idling this day phase and will happily rope me whenever they get around to it. No actual review of the slots in PoE is happening that I can see coming from them.Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
You guys are too much.
It would help to have the claims all viewable in one post. If we think the Titus/Klick wagons have scum equity, someone who knows how to analyze those maybe could?Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
FMPOV, if we are putting Kuribo, Ircher, TSQ and PB out of the POE, then we have :
Drixx,Dunnstral, Frozen Angel, GuyInFreezer, Save The Dragons
If you think there's only 3 scum, one of the above in red isn't scum. If you think there's 4 scum, and you are okay with the assumption on the top line of this post, then there is the game solve.Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
I think the order for me is: Dunnstral, GiF, FA and then StD.In post 5672, kuribo wrote:
Pretend I'm handing you a gunIn post 5670, Drixx wrote: FMPOV, if we are putting Kuribo, Ircher, TSQ and PB out of the POE, then we have :
Drixx,Dunnstral, Frozen Angel, GuyInFreezer, Save The Dragons
If you think there's only 3 scum, one of the above in red isn't scum. If you think there's 4 scum, and you are okay with the assumption on the top line of this post, then there is the game solve.
Which of those four do you start with?
If we're going to have the time for it, I will ISO dive all four and comment. I would expect this to take at least until Thursday night real time. I'll be working a lot of extra hours since my wife was laid off.Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
The gamestate requires an ISO dive. My mental model of you this game is that you've shown up and made posts, but made almost no actual impact on the game. I can't say whether that's true until I go read your ISO and look at the places which need context. That takes time, and I can only manage so much of that when I'm working 10am to midnight.In post 5687, Dunnstral wrote: The mafia team is not kuribo/ircher/TSQ/PB because GiF started the day voting me and PB asked them to unvote to discuss things today
If that was the mafia team, they'd just pile onto me instead. Or be pushing me harder. Drixx seems to have no caught onto this.
Drixx we don't need a full iso dive that takes 48 hours to complete. Can you take 5 minutes to explain why I am the most likely mafia from your point of view in that group of players?Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
The way the game unfolded. I largely drove the Titus wagon because I thought her refusal to engage with criticism of her proposed plan was scummy. Then the counter-wagon to Titus went through so fast (with a freaking self-hammer) that I took a 4 day vacation and the day started and concluded while I was away.In post 5698, Dunnstral wrote:
Great. Why does that make me the most likely to be mafia from your point of view?In post 5695, Drixx wrote: My mental model of you this game is that you've shown up and made posts, but made almost no actual impact on the game.
It doesn't feel to me like scum had to do a whole lot of pushing the game so far. I'd expect to find scum amongst those who were trying to appear active and around, but who didn't actually push anything and thus have little to no "responsibility" for what has gone wrong.
And yes ... I have a mental model for how relatively scummy I feel folks are, but that isn't enough for me to bet the game on. Actually reading through what each of you did and said and the context for it is going to be much more likely to help than me just going with whatever the first output my brain provides.Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
I already said that I think there are four scum, and in a game with four scum, you are scum. I need to ISO dive you to figure out why my brain prefers you over the others. Please don't misrep me.In post 5700, Dunnstral wrote: I fundamentally disagree that you need to iso dive me to decide why to scumread me. You either already think I'm mafia or you're making stuff up. Tell me why I'm wrong.Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
BTW I hope nobody is waiting on a claim from me. I was the commuter and since have been an extra.Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
I said it would take a couple days to finish all of the ISOs, not yours. You seem awfully desperate.In post 5717, Dunnstral wrote:
I don't think this is a misrep. You ordered me above 3 others but can't explain why. You gave minimal explanation when pressed and continue to say you need to take several days to read my iso to figure out why you think I am mafia. That is how I am seeing this interaction.In post 5709, Drixx wrote:
I already said that I think there are four scum, and in a game with four scum, you are scum. I need to ISO dive you to figure out why my brain prefers you over the others. Please don't misrep me.In post 5700, Dunnstral wrote: I fundamentally disagree that you need to iso dive me to decide why to scumread me. You either already think I'm mafia or you're making stuff up. Tell me why I'm wrong.Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
Fuck off trying to close the POE down. You haven't helped one iota in this game, and all your bullshit has just led to mis-lims.In post 5724, Pink Ball wrote:
First points out to my theory that GiF/Drixx are paired and Dunn got into wrong place wrong timeIn post 5719, kuribo wrote: Oh and for a "who would you murk first" tally:
GiF/Drixx- Dunnstral
STD / Dunnstral - GiF
Frozen Angel-
Second points out that GiF got into wrong place wrong time
Third points out to nothing
We are not voting either GiF or Dunn todayGet to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
For you to be dumb enough to rope me today and win the game for him?In post 5764, Thestatusquo wrote:
what would he be desperate for in this context?In post 5763, Drixx wrote:
I said it would take a couple days to finish all of the ISOs, not yours. You seem awfully desperate.In post 5717, Dunnstral wrote:
I don't think this is a misrep. You ordered me above 3 others but can't explain why. You gave minimal explanation when pressed and continue to say you need to take several days to read my iso to figure out why you think I am mafia. That is how I am seeing this interaction.In post 5709, Drixx wrote:
I already said that I think there are four scum, and in a game with four scum, you are scum. I need to ISO dive you to figure out why my brain prefers you over the others. Please don't misrep me.In post 5700, Dunnstral wrote: I fundamentally disagree that you need to iso dive me to decide why to scumread me. You either already think I'm mafia or you're making stuff up. Tell me why I'm wrong.Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
Because there is a possibility that it's only 3 scum, and in that case one of you aren't scum. And regardless of whether it's 3 or 4, I have to convince the rest of the game not to rope me, because there's a non trivial chance that ends the game.In post 5768, Dunnstral wrote: Why do you need to read through all the isos if they are all confirmed mafia to you Drixx?Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
PB is the "paranoia" slot. Does everyone understand how to handle such a slot? Do I need to explain, or is that settled theory at this point?Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
From your perspective, the POE is: Drixx, Dunnstral, GiF, Frozen Angel, and STD. PB is a "paranoia" possibility because of how the claims came about on D2.In post 5783, Thestatusquo wrote:
I have no idea what you mean, no.In post 5781, Drixx wrote: PB is the "paranoia" slot. Does everyone understand how to handle such a slot? Do I need to explain, or is that settled theory at this point?
If that PoE is true, then scum would now be forced to kill in the group of {Ircher, TSQ, Kuribo, PB} going forward.
So let's assume that in the next three cycles of phases, we rope Dunnstal, GiF and FA, and the scum kill Ircher, Kuribo and TSQ.
We go into what would have to be a final day with: Drixx, STD, PB
Who do you eliminate in that final day, and why? Feel free to replace me and STD with any two from among the POE if you think the roping would happen in some other order.Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
It's incredibly foolish to rush a day that could be ELO when all we've done is rope town. This is not a situation to rush through. Clearly nobody should be claiming roles they have today. There's a reason that way back on day 1, I pointed out that claims should be of prior held roles that are no longer in the claimant's hands. I thought that was super obvious and didn't need stating, but clearly I was wildly optimistic.In post 5796, Pink Ball wrote:
Well actually there's one thing that makes them win even if we they all scumclaimed right now: two town randing lovers and scum shooting them.In post 5790, Thestatusquo wrote: like as you said the issue is too many conf town not enough bullets. So scum is absolutely forced to try to play towards paranoia on the lovers and the caterer chain.
Anything else just leads to them losing.
Dragging this day is incredibly anti town because the longer it goes the more likely scum is to find a lover pair if there is one.
So the scumteam widening the PoE is not only a good strat to try and get a mislim today or in future days, but to try to fish for the lovers.
The day ends now. Following kuribo's and GiF's example, give two players you want limmed today.
kuribo: STD/FA
GiF: Dunn/FA
PB: STD/DrixxGet to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
Of course, and if the game lasts that long, I expect you will have been night killed.In post 5797, Thestatusquo wrote: I dont understand, in your example I am dead.
I want you to think of the problem as if you were in my shoes, or STD's shoes, and decide what the right play would be.Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
The point is this: If we manage to get it right today and then again tomorrow, and then again the next day, and the game continues ... the end game is gonna have PB in it. If you wouldn't bet the game that PB is town, then you should be trying to figure out why you wouldn't.
This isn't an argument to rope PB today, btw. PB shouldn't be considered unless we actually make it to a 3 person endgame, I think. As much as I question how the day 2 stuff happened, there's not a strong reason to push PB into the PoE prior to that hypothetical.
The point is to get the folks who will likely be dead by the time PB would have to be considered to go ahead and consider and answer. Since the situation is such that the scum are obligated to kill in the "conftown" block for the rest of the game, we know we're gonna lose these people and once lost we'll know we can trust their motives. Seems prudent to ask them what their not obvious thoughts are.
The PoE at this point is pretty universally accepted. At some point, the people who matter for how today will go will decide what order they want to tackle said PoE. It would be nice if they considered where that goes and put the effort in to leave us the legacy of their thoughts today.Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
It is impossible for me to stress enough how reckless those past couple posts were. We're in a game where we've done nothing but help scum all game, and you want to assert that it's just all gonna work out?Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
I can't get people to talk about what they should, nor to be quiet about what they shouldn't lol.
I would vote in the order I posted before. Dunn and GiF are solid answers. In the PoE, I feel much less confident about FA and STD in the case of only 3 scum and one of them would thus be town.Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
You're a fucking liar. You have consistently been on me first all day phase. Trash play if you're town.In post 6039, Pink Ball wrote: Some thoughts about yesterday and the exercise:
I actually like how STD reacted to pressure yesterday. I had some thoughts about him before the day started and I wanted to see how he would defend himself, what "townie traits" he thought he had to see if it was part of a scheme or if they were genuine traits. There's one thing that I was waiting to come from scum!StD as a solid defense that never came through: his read on FB. StD didn't question FB getting the caterer on D3 and he stopped pushing that slot before D2 ended. If STD was scum trying to widen the PoE, why wait until D4 to do it? It's not like he hasn't had thread presence, he's been engaged the entire game, so "going under the radar" is not a correct assestment about his play. Scum being worried about the slim PoE would've started acting as paranoid town before the game came to this point.
In contrast with StD's paranoia during this day, we have Drixx who was paranoid about the lovers' claim when it was claimed, paranoid about the caterer when it was claimed and kept his paranoia until this day. He is now inclined to believe the idea of being part of a non confirmed town PoE and that the scumteam would be {StD,GiF,Dunn,FA}, but keeping the "paranoia slot" rethoric alive. That to me looks way more "planning ahead in case me and my partners start getting limmed" than StD's survivalism during this day. Scum!STD has a lot of reasons to fight how he has fought today to avoid getting limmed (mainly to mess up associations and because yeah of course scum is closer to win today than tomorrow because of the game's mechanics), but town!STD has more reasons to fight because if he gets limmed he loses, period. On the other hand, we have Drixx, who came to the thread when he became the main focus of attention for a short period, said "if you lim me today you're gonna regret it" and then disappeared when STD became the main focus again.
Yesterday I started the day like StD->Drixx--->FA->Dunn--->GiF and now I'm more like Drixx----->StD/FA/Dunn->GiF.
Back to this:
Even if GiF is still looking the towniest of the bunch, StD towning it up makes me come back to the commuters' association. That means that there would be only one scum in {StD,FA}.In post 5516, Pink Ball wrote: - The three claimed commuters are scum and 1 scum in {StD,FA}. Why would GiF be going after Dunn in this scenario? While I think the scumteam's strategy is not bussing unless absolutely necessary (because one more night means more chances of town getting conftowned), if StD is the remaining partner it's completely valid to throw Dunn under the bus just to control the rethoric of the game for future days; GiF and co would know that there will be another day to play so making a GiF/Dunn 1v1 makes the other look good the next day. I think the real objective of this scumteam is missliming FA, which GiF started this day saying that was a possibility too.
- Two of three claimed commuters are scum. This one is based on two things: I still townread GiF by play; and the VC at EoD2. I think either GiF or Dunn where caught in the crossfire pushing Titus instead of Klick and I'm inclined to believe that GiF was the one caught there. BUT there's the connection between Drixx and GiF: even if the commuter was a real amnesiac role (confirmed by town!Dunn in this scenario), the way it was claimed on D2 and how GiF followed is concerning. I think that Dunn not claiming it on D3 is actually pro town. The remaining scum would be StD and FA.
And that's it, there are no other scenarios because of the PoE I have. Scenario 1 could discard the idea of voting between {StD,FA} even if everything points out to StD being scum. Scenario 2 discards the idea of voting between {GiF,Dunn}.
So my first strat still stands: lim Drixx, get one more night of night actions that give us more time to get one of the players inside the PoE to get conftowned via amnesiac roles and keep goind down the rabbit hole until we find the carrot.Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
My ISO is chock full of me being town. Anyone who says differently is either scum or bad. I've been pushing for town play all game, and have consistently pushed people to think about and analyze and come to their own conclusions. I've shared my thoughts, but I haven't rammed them down anyone's throat, and I've been practically begging the so called "conftown" block to actually do something with their status.Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
When you get fortunate enough to get "IC" status, you have an obligation (you signed up to play, didn't you?) to actually use your unimpeachable position to push a win, not sit around on your ass so you can say after the game "Well, it wasn't MY fault"Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
You haven't done anything except make rage posts Kuribo. That's clearly not getting it done.
I invite you to go look at the amount of analyzing Cerb and I did in "Steven Universe" when we were IC. Give Cerb 90% of the credit, and I still worked circles around the effort on display here (and it wasn't a 90/10 situation, but I'm trying to make a point).
You can rage at me all you like. You can even vote me. Doesn't change the fact that all you're doing is raging, and the folks who share in your status are also just doing nothing useful.
I'll literally eat my shorts if town can manage a single scum lim at this point, let alone find a path to victory.Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
In post 5339, Pink Ball wrote: I need to do a chart with all the claims give me a secIn post 5516, Pink Ball wrote: But I did find something interesting:
GiF is right, there are 16 roles instead of 15: all the PRs that we already know and 6 VTs. D1 is missing the Vig, the Tracker and the Gravedigger
Gravedigger and Tracker are real: Shea got the gravedigger yesterday and I got the tracker on D3.
Only role that has no confirmation is the vig, which conveniently is on a player who's alive today, but given the 16 roles instead of 15, it could be that one of the VTs is fake and it was actually a scum who fakeclaimed and randed the vig.
Another theory that we talked with Jingle back on D2: there could be 16 roles; that way the lovers get nerfed and make the game a little less townsided. Given how things went the rest of the days, this theory gets more credit now.
But what really caught my attention was this:
Drixx: Commuter, VT, VT
GiF: VT, Commuter, VT
Dunn: VT, VT, Commuter
Commuter is actually a great role for scum in this setup: it gives enough WIFOM about the comfirmable amnesiac roles to the point that some night actions could be disregarded via Commuter claim (Caterer targeted you and you didn't get the role? "Oh I was a commuter"; Visionary and someone else targeted you and you didn't claim receiving a vision? "Oh I commuted last night"; etc). The thing is, Titus started this discussion when Drixx claimed the Commuter, saying that he should've claimed it on D1, and GiF shut down that conversation by claiming the Commuter himself.
So what to do with this connection, knowing that the most likely scenario is that there are four scum members inside {StD,FA,GiF,Drixx,Dunn}?
- The three claimed commuters are scum and 1 scum in {StD,FA}. Why would GiF be going after Dunn in this scenario? While I think the scumteam's strategy is not bussing unless absolutely necessary (because one more night means more chances of town getting conftowned), if StD is the remaining partner it's completely valid to throw Dunn under the bus just to control the rethoric of the game for future days; GiF and co would know that there will be another day to play so making a GiF/Dunn 1v1 makes the other look good the next day. I think the real objective of this scumteam is missliming FA, which GiF started this day saying that was a possibility too.
- Two of three claimed commuters are scum. This one is based on two things: I still townread GiF by play; and the VC at EoD2. I think either GiF or Dunn where caught in the crossfire pushing Titus instead of Klick and I'm inclined to believe that GiF was the one caught there. BUT there's the connection between Drixx and GiF: even if the commuter was a real amnesiac role (confirmed by town!Dunn in this scenario), the way it was claimed on D2 and how GiF followed is concerning. I think that Dunn not claiming it on D3 is actually pro town. The remaining scum would be StD and FA.
And that's it, there are no other scenarios because of the PoE I have. Scenario 1 could discard the idea of voting between {StD,FA} even if everything points out to StD being scum. Scenario 2 discards the idea of voting between {GiF,Dunn}.
Drixx is the only confscum in both scenarios.In post 5519, Pink Ball wrote: UNVOTE: Drixx
Just to avoid ending the day quickly in case someone has something else to sayIn post 5525, Pink Ball wrote: Ok dude I know you need to keep the PoE wide
Do you disagree with what I said about Drixx?In post 5545, Pink Ball wrote:
{Drixx,Dunn} or {Drixx,GiF}. By play I'm inclined on the former, by associations on the latter, so inconclusiveIn post 5541, Dunnstral wrote: I don't get this; who are you saying is mafia here besides Save the Dragons and Frozen Angel?In post 5608, Pink Ball wrote: Strategically, voting Drixx is still the right choiceIn post 5630, Pink Ball wrote:
I'm actually pretty much ready to end itIn post 5625, Save The Dragons wrote: I need more time please don't end day quickly
What are you planningIn post 5666, Pink Ball wrote: I already did @DrixxIn post 5690, Pink Ball wrote:
Drixx, STD and FA?In post 5683, Frozen Angel wrote: That leaves GIF and Dun and I think there is a scum between the two. If both are town we have a 3 scum setup likely.In post 5724, Pink Ball wrote:
First points out to my theory that GiF/Drixx are paired and Dunn got into wrong place wrong timeIn post 5719, kuribo wrote: Oh and for a "who would you murk first" tally:
GiF/Drixx- Dunnstral
STD / Dunnstral - GiF
Frozen Angel-
Second points out that GiF got into wrong place wrong time
Third points out to nothing
We are not voting either GiF or Dunn todayIn post 5740, Pink Ball wrote:
I haven't eliminated it. It's in the context of what kuribo did.In post 5739, Frozen Angel wrote:
why you eliminated the possibility of both being scum to get this conclusion?In post 5736, Pink Ball wrote:
Because I think one of you is the remaining town in the PoE and we are not forced to solve that 1v1 now if we can go more nights that could give us more info or even one of you randing a loverIn post 5732, Dunnstral wrote: What I really care about is why not vote GiF today
I posted a while ago why Drixx is the best lim today strat wise.
Yep ... you totally haven't voted me today or consistently been pushing to rope me all day. Totally misrepresenting you here.In post 6039, Pink Ball wrote: Some thoughts about yesterday and the exercise:
I actually like how STD reacted to pressure yesterday. I had some thoughts about him before the day started and I wanted to see how he would defend himself, what "townie traits" he thought he had to see if it was part of a scheme or if they were genuine traits. There's one thing that I was waiting to come from scum!StD as a solid defense that never came through: his read on FB. StD didn't question FB getting the caterer on D3 and he stopped pushing that slot before D2 ended. If STD was scum trying to widen the PoE, why wait until D4 to do it? It's not like he hasn't had thread presence, he's been engaged the entire game, so "going under the radar" is not a correct assestment about his play. Scum being worried about the slim PoE would've started acting as paranoid town before the game came to this point.
In contrast with StD's paranoia during this day, we have Drixx who was paranoid about the lovers' claim when it was claimed, paranoid about the caterer when it was claimed and kept his paranoia until this day. He is now inclined to believe the idea of being part of a non confirmed town PoE and that the scumteam would be {StD,GiF,Dunn,FA}, but keeping the "paranoia slot" rethoric alive. That to me looks way more "planning ahead in case me and my partners start getting limmed" than StD's survivalism during this day. Scum!STD has a lot of reasons to fight how he has fought today to avoid getting limmed (mainly to mess up associations and because yeah of course scum is closer to win today than tomorrow because of the game's mechanics), but town!STD has more reasons to fight because if he gets limmed he loses, period. On the other hand, we have Drixx, who came to the thread when he became the main focus of attention for a short period, said "if you lim me today you're gonna regret it" and then disappeared when STD became the main focus again.
Yesterday I started the day like StD->Drixx--->FA->Dunn--->GiF and now I'm more like Drixx----->StD/FA/Dunn->GiF.
Back to this:
Even if GiF is still looking the towniest of the bunch, StD towning it up makes me come back to the commuters' association. That means that there would be only one scum in {StD,FA}.In post 5516, Pink Ball wrote: - The three claimed commuters are scum and 1 scum in {StD,FA}. Why would GiF be going after Dunn in this scenario? While I think the scumteam's strategy is not bussing unless absolutely necessary (because one more night means more chances of town getting conftowned), if StD is the remaining partner it's completely valid to throw Dunn under the bus just to control the rethoric of the game for future days; GiF and co would know that there will be another day to play so making a GiF/Dunn 1v1 makes the other look good the next day. I think the real objective of this scumteam is missliming FA, which GiF started this day saying that was a possibility too.
- Two of three claimed commuters are scum. This one is based on two things: I still townread GiF by play; and the VC at EoD2. I think either GiF or Dunn where caught in the crossfire pushing Titus instead of Klick and I'm inclined to believe that GiF was the one caught there. BUT there's the connection between Drixx and GiF: even if the commuter was a real amnesiac role (confirmed by town!Dunn in this scenario), the way it was claimed on D2 and how GiF followed is concerning. I think that Dunn not claiming it on D3 is actually pro town. The remaining scum would be StD and FA.
And that's it, there are no other scenarios because of the PoE I have. Scenario 1 could discard the idea of voting between {StD,FA} even if everything points out to StD being scum. Scenario 2 discards the idea of voting between {GiF,Dunn}.
So my first strat still stands: lim Drixx, get one more night of night actions that give us more time to get one of the players inside the PoE to get conftowned via amnesiac roles and keep goind down the rabbit hole until we find the carrot.Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
I'm part way through Dunnstral. I'm not terribly optimistic at this point that I'll be afforded time, nor am I optimistic that it will make a difference. The people who matter seem inclined to do as little a possible and seem super likely to just screw it up.In post 6057, Thestatusquo wrote: Drixx what progress have you made on the reads you were planning on doingGet to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
Please show me where you voted STD. I already showed where you would go on for awhile making posts to/about STD, and then make sure to post again about how the game should rope me.In post 6056, Pink Ball wrote: Do you want me to count how many posts have been about you and how many have been about STD?Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
I literally only posted quotes of you. You literally voted me, then unvoted me "in case", and have consistently made a point to post that I should be roped. The only consistency to your ISO today is a return to "But we should kill Drixx today" over and over.In post 6062, Pink Ball wrote: You know what, same as yesterday: I'm not giving you a platform to shit on me anymore. Peace outGet to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
I already shared preliminary thoughts. So far they aren't changed. Dunn's ISO is a textbook example of "appearing to be active" while doing absolutely nothing.In post 6059, Thestatusquo wrote: Do you have any preliminary thoughts?Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
How is that relevant? Every time you had a back and forth with STD, you made sure to make a post about how I should still be killed today. That makes those back and forths nothing more than show. You have been since day start, throughout the day and still at this moment focused on getting me roped. None of your many posts this day phase have altered that clear intent that you began with.In post 6066, Pink Ball wrote:
Again, do you want me to count how many posts are about you and how many posts are about STD being scum?In post 6063, Drixx wrote: "But we should kill Drixx today" over and over.Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
I wouldn't be surprised to see PB and STD paired at this point. It would explain a lot.
The problem is that I've got literally zero to work with. There's a bunch of "oh this makes sense" combinations, but none of it has an anchor point. It clearly cannot all be true, because it results in more scum than there can be.Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
Oh hi, BettlejuiceIn post 6069, Dunnstral wrote:
Point to a few examples?In post 6067, Drixx wrote: Dunn's ISO is a textbook example of "appearing to be active" while doing absolutely nothing.Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
I don't have to worry about associative posting. I don't know who my teammates are.Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
If you think you can afford it, please go ahead and rope me. If the game doesn't end, then you'll know it's 3 scum, and all you need to do is avoid roping another townie. Since I appear to be a huge distraction to ongoing efforts to scumhunt, that should make it easier, right?
I will point out that almost none of the "confirmed" bothered to respond to my post asking about PB, since the world where that matters is one where they won't be around to weigh in at that time. The one response was, I believe, asking for time to think about it but never came back.
I will say it's going to be amusing to quote and ask people to explain after the game why me showing up during very mappable and predictable hours to post when I have a minute here or there during work was viewed as scummy. I gave an explanation for my posting length and timing, and it should be trivially easy to map my posting times to line up to my work times. But still some insist on suggesting that I only show up if I'm mentioned.
No scum equity there tho, amirite?Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
I'm pretty sure it's the idea that a scum will reveal their partners.In post 6089, kuribo wrote:
Okay I'm gonna askIn post 6084, Dunnstral wrote:
I think Drixx is in full antispew mode and is intentionally avoiding giving hard stances on people "in the poe"In post 6080, Pink Ball wrote: If you think this isn't contributing I agree, this day should end and we should all vote Drixx
and so instead they take pot shots at kuribo and pink ball who are outside of the poe and outside of their consideration
What the fuck is spewGet to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
I cannot, intentionally or unintentionally, reveal anyone I'm aligned with. I am uninformed of their identities.In post 6091, Dunnstral wrote: Read it like this:
"I think drixx is trying to avoid creating links between who they are and are not aligned with by intentionally avoiding giving hard stances on people "in the poe"Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
Just because you don't like the answers I already gave doesn't obligate me to give new ones.In post 6094, Dunnstral wrote: Drixx, one last time, why are you ignoring stuff?Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
I reject the idea that I could possibly discern actual associative links from false positives in a game state where no scum are known. There's no way to separate signal from noise.In post 6097, Dunnstral wrote: But you haven't given answers. You haven't responded at all to being asked to case your two strongest scumreads together.Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
I have a ton of work to do for the next few hours. I will attempt to complete it and leave myself some waking time to finish Dunn, post it, and continue on to GiF.
For the record: They aren't my top scum reads because of some super sekret™ associative posts that only I was smart enough to spot. They're independent of one another, at least at this time. If that changes when reviewing their ISOs, I will of course say so.
But again ... there's nothing for me to use to separate signal from noise so ... don't get your hopes up.Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
Bro ... you're the "IC" ... you are the one whose opinion and analysis matters most. You're the one who should be doing ISO dives and noting them and telling the game which 3 or 4 in the POE are scum, and why.In post 6099, kuribo wrote:
To be clear, I'm not asking for these things for my own personal amusement or because it's funIn post 6097, Dunnstral wrote: But you haven't given answers. You haven't responded at all to being asked to case your two strongest scumreads together.
I want to see the PROGRESSION that links people to their scum reads and ties them together. It's creating discussion and more importantly it's putting people on the fucking record.
(I mean I know you know this, I'm reiterating it for the "do something" crowd)
I'm working on it as much as I can spare the time, because I expect to get roped very soon and if the game manages to continue after that point, my thoughts will at least be able to be trusted to have good intentions. Your thoughts are presumably already in that category though.
And yeah ... I realize I'm posting in thread when I could be continuing to read through ISOs, and take notes ... but I'm already being accused of beetlejuicing and being attacked for being gone from the game when I posted ahead of time I would be. Imagine if I wasn't interacting with the game right now.Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
That's literally process of elimination. If I accept the premise that Kuribo, Ircher and TSQ are all mechanically clear, and that PB is mostly mechanically clear, then I literally only have myself and those four other names. If I believe there are four scum, then I literally found scum, and I did it without looking at or finding any "associative" links.In post 6102, Dunnstral wrote:
What? Did you not post this:In post 6098, Drixx wrote:
I reject the idea that I could possibly discern actual associative links from false positives in a game state where no scum are known. There's no way to separate signal from noise.In post 6097, Dunnstral wrote: But you haven't given answers. You haven't responded at all to being asked to case your two strongest scumreads together.
Which means you think 3 of 4 of the names colored red, at least, are mafia from your point of view?In post 5670, Drixx wrote: FMPOV, if we are putting Kuribo, Ircher, TSQ and PB out of the POE, then we have :
Drixx,Dunnstral, Frozen Angel, GuyInFreezer, Save The Dragons
If you think there's only 3 scum, one of the above in red isn't scum. If you think there's 4 scum, and you are okay with the assumption on the top line of this post, then there is the game solve.
You cannot possibly misunderstand this, but you are trying to present it as if I'm being inconsistent. That's scummy.Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
I really do have a lot of work to do. I'm going to just close this down and focus on getting said work done.Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
Lunch break: by definition nobody in the PoE can achieve a quick rope on someone else in the PoE without someone outside the PoE voting. Without a vote from one of you, you can sit and watch forever, and nobody else is gonna vote because they don't want to out themselves. I'm town and they know it.
If the game continues and I'm still alive, I'll try and have at least one ISO up before I sleep. If you rope me, I've already told you my order of suspicion and you'll have to do without me more deeply examining it, should the game continue.Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
Got some progress on ISO notes. Should be able to finish before sleep I think. May not comment heavily on today's posts because it's basically Dunn going "post your work" and me saying "it's not done yet" and various iterations of that.
@TSQ - You know the answer already because we've played together before. I very infrequently vote, and I am ridiculously careful about voting in potential end of game scenarios. I feel like you've played with me enough before to know that? Or with me and Cerb in hydra as Reasonably Rational? It might be the most consistent aspect of my play.Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
I recognized your name in the player list, so I thought we must have played before. I assumed it would have been in a Varsoon game. Even if that's faulty memory on my part, it's also super easy to confirm by just going through games.
For example, in the game we're currently playing I voted a grand total of twice.Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
I'd have to go look at old games to find one that meets your particular criteria, but I'm fairly certain if you find a game where I was town and it was an endgame scenario, you won't find me voting without consensus first.In post 6139, Thestatusquo wrote: Can you give me an example of a game where you were voted by someone in a 1v1 as town and not voted them back?
Your reasoning about why I should reciprocally vote Dunn here is flawed I think. I'll lay out the potential scenarios and what a vote means in each.
I'm town, Dunn is scum. In this scenario, it doesn't do anything for me to vote. Dunn's team mates aren't going to vote him while there's hope that one of the "conf" will vote me. In this case, it is incumbent upon me to demonstrate who is scum and get people to follow my case.
I'm town and Dunn is town. If this is the scenario, then my vote still does nothing, except it puts the game into a 1v1 scenario where once one of the "conf" pick a side, then scum can pile on and get the mis-lim. If we're in this particular world, that would not end the game (unless PB is scum and we have 4 scum, or the lovers clear chain is scum), but me pushing the gamestate there would rob me of the chance to put as much of my thoughts as possible into the game, in the case that I eat rope and the game continues.
If I were scum, I would be incentivized to push the 1v1 with Dunn, regardless of their alignment, because at this point it seems likely one of us is gonna go, so there's literally nothing to lose from a scum pov. Ironically, I still wouldn't have voted in that situation.
For evidence that as scum I would not place a vote in an endgame situation without reaching consensus, please see the "SMITE" themed game, where I replaced into a scum slot with an inherited 3rd party claim and literally passed up a chance to quickhammer on the last day. It's this weird quirk of how I approach the game and I realize it's way off meta. But it is ME and how I play, and easily verifiable.Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
PB you are wrong. The only question is whether you are "genuinely" wrong or not.
I said on day 2 when the claim happened that there would be an appropriate time to act upon it if nobody else ever confirmed them. Today is the time but we conveniently have another claim coming in that has a "domino" clearing effect. If you can't see how that would be strong as a scum gambit ... dunno what to say. Like ... there's a non trivial possibility space that the game is literally just the four "cleared" are scum and the rest of us are just fighting with each other while you all laugh about it. I've seen much crazier stuff in this game over the years.
But your assertion that I didn't seriously consider it is just wrong. It's provably wrong just by reading what I said about it in day 2. If there wasn't a claim by TSQ that "clears" Kuribo, today would have been the appropriate time to rope Ircher, which is what I not so subtly hinted at on day 2.
I need to read all the posts that showed up in p-edit, and I also have about 2.25 hours of work left, and then however long it takes me to finish with what I've been working on.Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
Who said I dropped my paranoia? I said that the explanation of it as "This character is 'the Romeo' of our production" scratched the linguistic itch that was bothering me. And while you may not realize it, most people do like 95% of their linguistic work by instinct. It's like how English speakers know that the "Big hairy dog" is correct but "hairy big dog" is incorrect, instinctually. It really did matter when it seemed like there was a large inconsistency with the naming schema, because it's unlikely that most people even think of it as a schema. They just do things by instinct.In post 6170, Pink Ball wrote:In post 5643, Drixx wrote:
Interesting. This is "the Romeo" of this production.In post 5642, Thestatusquo wrote: It's been a long time since I've been involved in theatre but I believe I have heard the term "the romeo" and "the juliet" to refer to a plays main romantic leads before.
Not sure though.
This is all it took for Drixx to drop his paranoia.In post 5644, Drixx wrote: That actually scratches that particular itch I've had for awhile. I still think we're in a 4 scum game, which means today is ELO.
The "up" side of setting Ircher/Kuribo/TSQ aside as probably town, along with PB, is that I know my own role and if we're in a 4 scum game it's literally solved. The "down" side is that right now I think the folks who matter are poised to rope me, which would end the game as a loss.
Would you have dropped being paranoid over this? Do you relate with this?Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
If you happen to be scum? Yep. If I were scum and in your position, I'd probably be posting very similarly to you and laughing all the way to the win.In post 6201, Pink Ball wrote:
Do you feel like I'm laughing todayIn post 6196, Drixx wrote: while you all laugh about itGet to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
Thank you. That's a remarkably helpful post. Now I have to try and figure out if you would have made this post as scum. Why lend me clarity when I'm so clearly having trouble with the game state...In post 6200, Dunnstral wrote:
No there isn'tIn post 6196, Drixx wrote: there's a non trivial possibility space that the game is literally just the four "cleared" are scum and the rest of us are just fighting with each other while you all laugh about it.
Because I'm voting you and the game isn't over, and they've all posted
!!!Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
I would welcome being confirmed town.In post 6206, Thestatusquo wrote: I guess I should say this officially. If we lim not STD I will be targeting STD with the caterer. If there is a tracker they should track me. If there's a visionary they should target STD.
If we do not lim Drixx today I will target Drixx, same plan for tracker, visionary target drixx.
If we somehow lim neither of them idk what I'll do yet. Probably Drixx, but I'll decide for sure if this becomes a realistic possibility.Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
If nothing else, thanks for this bit of levity.In post 6215, kuribo wrote:
Eh I got call bells ringing can we schedule for say 11:43pm EST?In post 6212, Thestatusquo wrote: Y'all wanna quick hammer?
That good with you guys?Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
I was looking quickly through TSQ's ISO and stumbled upon this post. Despite my frustration with Titus for not responding to my criticism of her plan by improving said plan or explaining in some other way, she was remarkably on point with the game state. Like ... she has FB in the poe and GiF out, but only because she presumed Black would be targeting GiF. She otherwise literally predicted the gamestate.In post 4120, Thestatusquo wrote:
I have literally no clue what this post meansIn post 4118, Titus wrote: Black - Dead
Drixx
Dunnstral
Firebringer
Frozen Angel
GuyInFreezer - Black Clear - Hypo
Ircher - Linked
Klick - Dead
Kuribo - Linked
Pink Ball - Linked
Save The Dragons
Thestatusquo - Hypothetical [not revealing X]
Titus - Linked
This leaves Drixx, Dunn, Fire, FA, StD
Versus Kuribo Ircher Titus Shea, GiF
With Lovers and Caterer in play.
Propers where they belong.Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014