Almost/Alisae scum team confirmed!
VOTE: Almost
No wait..
VOTE: Alisae
Damn, can't lynch you both today. I will get it done eventually though!
Almost/Alisae scum team confirmed!
Nice! Sorry I was a no show the entire game. I barely had time for one game, and since I was scum and wasn't a hydra, I had to put my time in that game. Glad you won!In post 42, Alisae wrote:Btw tywin I won Hogwartz
Why are you making me read RVS? I usually don't start paying attention until after.In post 41, Almost50 wrote:@Tywin: I'm trying to give you all the slack you need to rectify your play in hopes you're not yet tuned in, but then I'll have to come down on you real hard if that doesn't change soon.
Hint: reread the thread. Now tell me what you missed.
That's no fun. I want to collect them all and then wish for either your death or your resurrection and then subsequent second death. Although if I don't collect them all, then yes, nobody should have them.In post 25, Almost50 wrote:Oh, I'm sorryIn post 21, Not Chara wrote:weeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.
Almost: i don't know! and after i joined to play with you... it brings a tear to my eye.
But it's probably bc the last 2 Kuroi games we were in as a hydra, so I subconsciously thought we were playing with the hydra account.
But now I do have a thought: This dragonballs thing makes the game potentially very swingy. I think we all should keep passing them around if we get more than one just to prevent their potential accumulation with scum. Like, it should be ok for any one player to keep only ONE dragon ball at a time. Thoughts?
Vifam's voting me too? Haha, I honestly didn't know. Should've been voting you to even it up then. I skimmed page 1 and didn't really read until pg2, since that's where my OP landed. Regardless, you're looking into things a little too hard for being so early, so I question whethe you're town this game. You're already attempting to shade me using a very bad reason (not noticing vifam's vote), which you'd do as scum to set up a possible mislynch of town me. If I was scum, I doubt they'd vote for their buddy this early to make it an actual wagon.In post 52, Almost50 wrote:The thing is you addressed both mine and Alisae's vote on you. but totally ignored Vifam's. Since we just finished a game where you were scum, and I partially caught you by noticing you neither voted nor got voted by your scum partners, I was wondering if Vifam (who was also in that game) tried to change that and you missed his gesture. It's a 50-50, but you'd have to admit it's strange you didn't even say hello to the guy who put the 3rd vote on you.In post 50, Tywin Lannister wrote:Why are you making me read RVS? I usually don't start paying attention until after.In post 41, Almost50 wrote:@Tywin: I'm trying to give you all the slack you need to rectify your play in hopes you're not yet tuned in, but then I'll have to come down on you real hard if that doesn't change soon.
Hint: reread the thread. Now tell me what you missed.
You agree with it, but don't agree with it? What does that even mean, and why do you need my response to respond to it at all? Are you hoping for a quick wagon on me, and you want to help him shade me with some very bad reasoning? Or what's the deal? Either you agree with him or not, and if not, why would you need my response to address him? Are you hoping to sheep him for a quicklynch in RVS?In post 54, Imperium wrote:I feel good about Almost's approach to Tywin, although I can't say I agree with it. Will make a full response to it after Tywin responds.
My flavor? I can't tell you what my PM says. I'm Earthling/Earth-aligned thoufh if that's what you're asking. What's yours?In post 77, Alisae wrote:Oh yeah Tywin what's your flavor?
Oh my flavor name? I don't want to say, because it only helps scum in this instance. If I get to L1 or something, I'll say. I think it's pretty obvious what my role is if I say my flavor name, so I don't see any reason to give it out.In post 92, Alisae wrote:lmaaaaaaoIn post 90, Tywin Lannister wrote:My flavor? I can't tell you what my PM says. I'm Earthling/Earth-aligned thoufh if that's what you're asking. What's yours?In post 77, Alisae wrote:Oh yeah Tywin what's your flavor?
It says that too but I was moreso referring to the "Who are you" part.
I'm not jumpy. Jumpy would be me actually worried about a wagon right now. I'm just questioning what you said, because it looks contradictory as well as opportunistic, seeing as I lead the vote count currently. Why are you calling me jumpy for questioning you? That's not how this works. You'd not know if I was jumpy or not based on the post, but it should show me trying to early sort you, since you've made a stance, although it's very 'on the fence' in regards to what you said. From my perspective, 'if' you are scum, you're putting feelers out to see if you can get away with voting me, but it's too early for you to fully commit, so you gave a contradictory statement to possibly lean either way depending on future events. It's not out of the question to think scum would say what you did in hopes others sheep the wagon and you help finish off the lynch. Then again, it could mean absolutely nothing too, but j don't know without asking.In post 94, Imperium wrote:Your jumpiness does not do your namesake justice. I expected a calmer, cooler approach than the jumpy. (This is not an insult by the way this head is a little jumpy too.)In post 89, Tywin Lannister wrote:You agree with it, but don't agree with it? What does that even mean, and why do you need my response to respond to it at all? Are you hoping for a quick wagon on me, and you want to help him shade me with some very bad reasoning? Or what's the deal? Either you agree with him or not, and if not, why would you need my response to address him? Are you hoping to sheep him for a quicklynch in RVS?In post 54, Imperium wrote:I feel good about Almost's approach to Tywin, although I can't say I agree with it. Will make a full response to it after Tywin responds.
You are misreading my other head's point. Nacho likes Almost's approach as in thinks she's probably town from it, but does not agree with her conclusion. It's entirely possible to like what someone's approach says about them but not like their conclusion or argument. That's the case here as far as I know Nacho also has a leaning town read on you.
Neither of us is in the habit of defending people before they have the chance to defend or explain themselves. Why do you think we should have?
This stuff if fine and sounds good, but here's the issue: whoever hammered a lynch, scum would probably know that person now has a dragon ball. If they hammered scum who have them, then scum would know for sure. So the person to hammer probably will become a target. Can dragon balls be passed around at any time? If it's only at night, then which resolves first, the NK or dragon ball passing? This may be in the rules that I barely skimmed, but if not, it's a question worth asking. Say I hammered scum who had multiple dragon balls. Scum would know immediately that I got them all, right? So then my best play is to pass them to a conf town or someone I hard TR to avoid scum getting them in case I then become the NK target. Right?In post 86, Almost50 wrote:Personally, I will be passing the balls randomly but never twice to the same player, and that's if I lay my hands on any at all.
Like i said, I barely skimmed them, but my point about passing the balls if you hammer someone with them, especially if they're scum, is probably the best play. I'll reread the mechanics after work, but I still think my view on it is right, or at least it's good to bluff and pretend you'll pass them. Idk.In post 108, Almost50 wrote:It IS in the Mechanics post. Passing balls resolves before NKs, and TOWN can only pass balls at night, while Scum can do it anytime except when they're the leading wagon.In post 105, Tywin Lannister wrote:g. Say I hammered scum who had multiple dragon balls. Scum would know immediately that I got them all, right? So then my best play is to pass them to a conf town or someone I hard TR to avoid scum getting them in case I then become the NK target. Right?
Lmaooooo (not really) why are you not?In post 111, Alisae wrote:lmaaaaaaaaaaaoIn post 110, Almost50 wrote:Tywin, I,perium, and I forgot the third one, though I remember they had a cute avatar that they just changed into one that's not nearly as cute.
Why are you TRing them?
Why is it supposed to be helpful to you? Also, I now SR you based on your responses in the thread so far, such as constant bad questions, but not contributing or adding your own thoughts at any point. You also ask extremely superficial questions that don't actually do or say anything, but it makes you 'look' like you're contributing.
You have very subtle differences in what you ask and how you ask it when town/scum. I could be wrong here, but you're the best I've got so far early on D1.In post 161, Alisae wrote:Tywin I'm concerned because you know I ask questions like that all the time because I try to understand what people are thinking so I can work with them.
I have no idea how you got that I'm not TRing them based off of that.
In post 165, Alisae wrote:ooooooooooh you're scum. Everything makes sense now considering town!Tywin doesn't SR me for that.In post 162, Tywin Lannister wrote:Why is it supposed to be helpful to you? Also, I now SR you based on your responses in the thread so far, such as constant bad questions, but not contributing or adding your own thoughts at any point. You also ask extremely superficial questions that don't actually do or say anything, but it makes you 'look' like you're contributing.
Basically, you're doing exactly what you did in Hogwarts Mafia as scum. You're not acting like townie you would. Funny, my vote was originally just RVS and OMGUS to your/Almost's vote, but now it actually has a reason to be there.
In post 169, Imperium wrote:I will still respond when I'm not out on phone, but I no longer care about this question as I have a decent enough meaning town read that it doesn't matter.In post 106, Imperium wrote:Will respond when not on my phone walking out the door, but Tywin are you an alt or are you as new as your start date says?
I'm still catching up, but since I was addressed here:In post 247, Not Chara wrote:Alisae's relatively quick new decisions based on the posting from other players is something i've seen from town Alisae.
Tywin: have you seen town Alisae? what you described as scum just looks like the question-heavy town Alisae i've seen before. what's the difference?
135: acknowledges bias but doesn't make an effort to work around it, and wants to policy on page 6? i don't see an actual scumread here.
In post 270, Vifam wrote:ive played with town alisae before and so far he feels the same
What vibe? I was in Smackdown and got Nk'ed the night I was drafted, so I didn't pay attention to him much. Can you elaborate?In post 257, Vifam wrote:He's also giving off the same vibe I was kind of getting from RAW when I first drafted there and he was scum in that game so
Why are you saying it is AI? I talked about it and I know I'm not scum. So do you have a reason for this view or just hoping to shade anyone that dares mention game mechanics?In post 175, Desperado wrote:are you suggesting that any discussion of the dragonballs is strictly nai maria?
cuz I dont agree
Town lean so far, but it's mainly due to recent posts. I really need to reread to get a grasp of what's been said, since I've mostly only been reading while at work and half distracted.In post 199, Alisae wrote:Tywin what's your opinion on NC?
That didn't answer my question. Why do you think it's AI? If it's for both directions, then it's inherently NAI due to being something absolutely any alignment would talk about.In post 278, Desperado wrote:alignment indicative works in both directions bud
You're not getting it tigerIn post 283, Desperado wrote:you aren't getting me bro
discussing the mechanic may or may not provide alignment tells
maria suggested that all mech talk is NAI and i do not agree
Here's something that doesn't add up: if scum have the same wish as town (resurrecting a dead player), then it's useless to them. We know whose scum after a flip, so bringing that player back just gets them lynched again immediately. All it does is give scum essentially one more wasted day/NK. This can't be what they have them for, because it just doesn't make sense. Mine as well just give scum a free kill or something.In post 81, Imperium wrote:Attempting to keep them safe/pass them around frequently also means they're more likely to end up in scum hands, and once scum touches them, they keep them.
We will also constantly worry about whether scum is close to having all the dragon balls and are close to resurrecting a dead brother or sister; activating them is the only way to kill the threat completely.
All that means is its Lylo earlier than normal IF we don't manage to lynch any scum by then. If there are 5 players left and only one scum dead, then I'd already call it a loss. That would be terrible town play IMO. So again, I don't see any legitimate reason for scum to have the exact same wish as town. It helps only in that one specific scenerio, and if that scenerio happened, town were already losing. There's gotta be something else they have. Why are you assuming otherwise? You really think it's not possible that scum don't have seperate wishes than town that we don't know about?In post 288, Imperium wrote:3 townies alive, 2 scum alive. Scum resurrect a member, scum win the game.
I agree with this. This guy pinged me f'ing HARD with that entrance. Red flags and sirens went off immediately.
Haha I'm just lazier now, because nobody reads my wall posts anyway. I also don't have a case on someone I need to push (besides clumsy, whose posts and extremely late entrance is the case in itself). Totally think the hydra is scum for real though. It's my first hard SR that isn't based on me nitpicking meta.In post 302, Alisae wrote:In all seriousness I like the fact you're being way more concise now.
Found the buddy.In post 304, Socrates wrote:Alisae, CP said multiple times in his opening that he knew he was going to be scumread, and here we are.
You implied you don't think he's that hard to read. How do you feel about This?
I was originally going to follow up on my joke about wishing for your death/resurrection/death again, but realized it's pretty stale after the first post. That being said, I'd have to hammer everyone to get them since I doubt I'll ever be passed to, so I'm pretty much going to ignore the whole ball thing entirely unless scum seem to have them and the early Lylo situation potentially pops up.In post 357, Almost50 wrote:I would, but only if I could wish for a plasma TV or iPhone 7 plus.In post 297, KuroiXHF wrote:Notes: - Who here wants to collect all seven dragonballs!?
Haha the sad thing is that college taught me to write the way I do. It's a byproduct of needing a way to easily write essays that fit the arbitrary page/word count requirements. I also have a bachelors in English, so as you can imagine, my skill in writing convoluted BS skyrocketed.In post 364, Majiffy wrote:Wall posts aren't bad you just need to learn to be a bit more concise with them.
Here's my hangup with your reasoning: you're knowingly using your own meta as a way to excuse scummy behavior. This is classic scum stuff. It's probably more in a NAI realm since lots of people do it, but scum can and do manipulate their past meta to excuse their behavior in other games. Granted, this can mean Ali is doing the same to make me TR him, and Almost/NC surely do it too, but it never sits well with me when it's used an excuse for why someone acts scummy. Ali isn't bringing up the past as a way to say 'I'm not scum even though I act scummy' here, but you are. That's the main difference.In post 362, Clumsy Phoenix wrote:I believe I explained in my first post that I hadn't gotten a hold of Clumsy in a bit and didn't want to lurk this game, we've had a problem with that in past when hydraing because we like to wait to speak with one another before posting. I can link our past games if anyone cares to see them and confirm that I am telling the truth wrt my posting and us lurking due to wanting to converse before posting.
Personally I think ABR hardpushing what he thinks is just kinda an ABR thing, fits him as a person from what I've seen. That said, anyone who has played with him has better meta knowledge than I do, so I figure I'll defer there first. Not sure if Clumsy has or hasn't.
Tywin, Alisae, and Socrates, have any of you given your thoughts on Desperado yet?
Yes, the WWE game. I had you firmly as town, not only because of balance reasons (I couldn't see any way that both managers would be scum without the game being extremely unbalanced), but because you were logical in a townie way, weren't pushing the wrong players, buddied the right ones when necessary, and a few other things that avoided any red flags. It was a pretty good showing as scum tbh. I was impressed.In post 366, Not Chara wrote:Tywin, while you're here: i'm curious, where have you seen my scum meta to know to make that judgement? my memory is bad, so i might simply be forgetting. was it Kuroi's WWE game?
In post 377, Almost50 wrote:That's because it's a hydra, duh!!In post 376, Alisae wrote:In post 358, KuroiXHF wrote:
"Goku, I swear to God. I will ride your ass on this one."
"Oh my..."
"DAMN IT, TAKEI!"
Notes:- Sha la het sha la...[/color]
(expired on 2017-04-04 12:55:00) until the end of Day One.
With thirteen alive, it takes seven to lynch.@MODyou have 2 clumsy phoenix wagons[/b]
You are easy to forget about apparently. I also remember your avatar better than your name, and recent activity of others made you fall to the wayside. I don't SR you right now though so it doesn't really matter.In post 387, Desperado wrote:u wot m8In post 385, Tywin Lannister wrote:What post about desperado? I also haven't paid attention to him. Didn't even know he was in the game.
What's yours? I have early scum vibes from them, but it's purely gut.In post 379, Alisae wrote:What's your Socrates read?
Posts like this are what I like seeing from you. The reason is that I now am almost positive that you two aren't scum buddies. You'd not call a scum buddy your highest TR in the game on D1. This doesn't mean one of you can't be scum, but it does guarantee that you aren't scum together.In post 402, Alisae wrote:He's my highest TR.In post 393, Tywin Lannister wrote:What's yours? I have early scum vibes from them, but it's purely gut.In post 379, Alisae wrote:What's your Socrates read?
Me being condescending would be saying 'take your newb as and shove it.' Since I have much thicker skin than whichever head got all offended, I got a laugh out of it. That being said, I'm fairly confident I have more total time not only on this site, but also playing Mafia in general than what you apparently think. Nothing I said was 'newb' or even relates to what a newb would say. Even if it was, my point remains valid.In post 462, Imperium wrote:In post 460, Tywin Lannister wrote:The last few pages suck. Let me get that out of the way. Nothing worthwhile has been said. It's all talk about motivations for TRs rather than finding scum. Imperium seems to be sorting players somewhat, but going in the wrong direction for it. Enough of why you TR someone. It's worthless. I personally don't care who TRs who. It just means they aren't in your lynch pool for whatever arbitrary reason. I also dislike motives and things being discussed, because all motives boil down to two things: town lynching scum and scum not getting lynched/mislynching town. It's pretty damn simple.
So since you're all here and ready to talk, let's talk. I'm about to go to bed, but when you all wake up, drink your morning coffee, and check the thread, here's what I personally wanna see: Scum reads/lynch pool and specific reasons as to why.
The rest boils down to fluff and makes people look like they're contributing/active while they say nothing. Imperium has done that to a T with their posts. It's all questioning TRs and learning motivation for them rather than saying 'I SR the following player(s) and here's why.'
So give that info and take a stance. Stop walking the fence and discussing everything except who to lynch. It's pinging me due to the constant fluff, and the only reason I'm saying it is A) because it may be your specific way to sort (although I find that it sidesteps the entire point to discuss TRs over SRs) and B) I want to get some meat and potatoes in this game. Currently, its some nouveau artisan food that's arranged all pretty, but it consists of a carrot, two peas, an eggsprout, and some chicken shavings. The game is starving for actual content.
Tl;dr: get to the point and give your SRs. Take a stance and say why. Not doing so is becoming scummy.
If this is to us you can take your condescending newb ass and shove it. We don't need advice on how to play this game from anyone, least of all you. We have a pretty damn strong town game and will solve the game our own way.
You should learn to understand different styles of play and recognize when town are trying to sort. You might learn something.
(Although the sheeer condescension you just displayed is more tywin-esque so good on you for that, but you don't see me criticizing your methods do you? No, good stand aside and watch how it's actually done.)
In post 465, Imperium wrote:Town play, in a tired, half-assed nutshell, is being transparent and determining motivation. I've never understood why some people insist on only scumhunting or only townhunting because you're only playing half of the game when you do so; finding town means narrowing down your scum pool, reducing scum mislynches, finding people to scumhunt with.In post 460, Tywin Lannister wrote:Enough of why you TR someone. It's worthless. I personally don't care who TRs who. It just means they aren't in your lynch pool for whatever arbitrary reason. I also dislike motives and things being discussed, because all motives boil down to two things: town lynching scum and scum not getting lynched/mislynching town. It's pretty damn simple.
Motive is also remarkably more complicated than that; you've correctly noted our win conditions but the path to get there is different for ever player, hence different styles. In addition, not everything a player posts feeds into their wincondition; there are emotional responses and there are things people say regardless of alignment, etc. If you don't take what people are trying to do into account, how can you make the claim you understand them?
So do the work for you? That's not how this works. I can and probably will, but it's not my job to scum hunt for you, especially when you're so averse to it. It's my job to point out your inconsistencies and push you to either be better if town or lynch you if scum. That's it. You've not shown me that you're town based on your posts, but it's also not enough to SR you either. Your suspicion is fine and I have no problems with it, but if you can't push a SR at all, it's certainly not my job to do it for you. That's on you, and since you have two heads, I'm sure one of you can come up with a way to convince others if you legitimately SR someone. If you are scum, it only helps you to have town push your wagons for you.In post 466, Imperium wrote:Could you call out these votes specifically?In post 461, Tywin Lannister wrote:useless/naked/sheep votes on the slot.
I'd also like to hear you rephrase our suspicions on Not Chara, as well as Socrates; you note that our cases aren't legitimate, but there's no impetus for me to refine an approach until you show me it's broken.
My posts weren't really directed toward you, or anyone in particular actually. Imperium took offense, but my point is that it's been a lot of talking in circles and not going anywhere. D1 lynches are almost always mislynches of town, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't try to converge as a whole and see what the majority agree on. Simple wagons/votes don't do it, because most town think 'fuck it, they're not me so I'll lynch them' and are done with it. A better approach, in my 'newb ass that can shove it' opinion is to get definitive lynch pools from everyone and see where they stand. It helps get reads from everyone, makes scum actually work for it, shows far more motivation (which imperium likes so much) than just asking why they TR someone (it's fucking easy to TR anyone as scum, much harder to make legit cases on their fake SRs), and it makes everyone at least put minimal effort into the game.In post 467, Almost50 wrote:*Pout* I don't drink coffee. Does that mean you don't want to talk to me?In post 460, Tywin Lannister wrote:when you all wake up, drink your morning coffee, and check the thread,
O'right Chef .. err.. Chief.In post 460, Tywin Lannister wrote:B) I want to get some meat and potatoes in this game. Currently, its some nouveau artisan food that's arranged all pretty, but it consists of a carrot, two peas, an eggsprout, and some chicken shavings. The game is starving for actual content.
Seriously though, my stances are clear. My lynch pool is currently in Maria/Clumsy/Socrates/Majiffy/ABR. I don't SR read any of them in particular though. It's mainly PoE. You'd notice I haven't been voting anyone for a long time now.. just waiting for someone to do something that would ping me hard enough to merit a vote.
If it helps, I'm starting to think the Clumsy slot is a low hanging fruit, and even if Scum they're not going to last long and will definitely be found out soon enough. I'm not liking their hopping between wagons, but it certainly isn't reason enough for me to want them lynched.
I don't like ABR's over aggressiveness, but that's ABR as either alignment. If he starts lurking though I'd be willing to vote there, because it seems that -as Scum- he cannot keep up with the act for too long.
Socrates is meh. Majiffy is a total null and Maria I fear I'm a bit too paranoid about her since I've seen both her Scum and Town games and cannot tell the difference. In a game that has just ended a few hours ago I was SPOILED in the dead thread and still had doubts about her alignment. God! She could have hammered Town for the win and didn't, thus earning her a semi-confirmed status at MyLo.
So, while I don't have any actual case on any of them myself I'd be willing to sheep a GOOD case on either (keyword here being GOOD). Everyone else I TR to varying degrees.
I agree. Being town is boring. Being scum is way more fun.In post 539, MariaR wrote:(Input self meta on how I love being scum and hate being town wifom here)
Oh save it. We all like doing this as scum too. Anyways, at least you're posting now. I'm staying on majiffIn post 555, MariaR wrote:Although I really do like finding that one really towny player and buddying them so we can be bff's as town ^_^
Oh and Imperium: no worries. I don't get offended easily, at least not playing Mafia. Everyone says things in the game that they wouldn't outside of it. It's part of the game IMO. If I thought I could get a scum player to out themselves somehow by being insulting, I'd do it. Wouldn't mean that I actually disliked them as a person or a player. It's just how the game goes sometimes.In post 560, Desperado wrote:did you think i was joking when we had our conversation re: dragonballs or what?In post 552, MariaR wrote:I'm pretty sure you had me as nullish but correct me if I'm wrong. Why don't you say why you sr me cause in my eyes that was a very random out of no where vote
Pedit: What's hedging? O_o
hedging is you saying i'm either scum or wrong (town)