In post 12, MTD wrote:/sheeping sthar
hogget tastes yummy therefore we should dine on it tonight.
^^^^
pl that before mollie takes my sanity
In post 12, MTD wrote:/sheeping sthar
In post 71, wgeurts wrote:Nero is very hungry for blood, I suggest we question him why he wants blood.
In post 75, wgeurts wrote:I'm saying first we should pressure them to see how they react and base our judgement off that.
In post 81, Nero Cain wrote:In post 71, wgeurts wrote:Nero is very hungry for blood, I suggest we question him why he wants blood.
I'M A VAMPIRE!!!
In post 80, MonkeyMan wrote:In post 78, wgeurts wrote:There are 9-10 town and 3 mafia
How do you know how many mafia there are?
The only way you could is if you were on the scum team.
Scum found! Lets lynch it!
In post 85, Aneninen wrote:Wow la, I've just woken up and there so many posts here with so little content... as if the player list consisted of Aneninen. ^_^
I specially liked the part where certain players are willing to quicklynch someone because the Deadline is bugged. I'd suggest reading post 1, box 2, point 8, words 4 to 7.
Oh, you want content. Well, as for 78 from Wgeurts. I think he simply hasn't read the setup which is a null... in itself. Let's see what happens next. (By the way, your name sounds funny if you try to pronounce it in Dutch lololol!)
And now, the weather forecast. Hi there, Sthar8, Antihero and Mollie!
In post 96, sthar8 wrote:my nero vote is now serious.
In post 104, Death Stare wrote:Even though you do this in basically every game ever, you jumped too early on asking for my reaction to my wagon. You should've waited until more votes piled up.
In post 111, Aneninen wrote:NeroCain also performed vote flipping. This one in 56: "scum hunting is really hard these days, you have a ton of players that are intentionally anti-town and then the rest of the players are irrational as fuck so determining if they are bad town or scum is a crap shoot." is WTF? I don't think it's a sign of scumhunting. Plus, jumping on the Wgeurts wagon. So, he's also amongst my scumreads.
In post 118, Aneninen wrote:Am I the only one who has missed the joke?
In post 115, wgeurts wrote:
Indeed but even a panicking town can give off information, take for instance who defends him, or who doesn't. Later info like this can be used to find connections.
You're right.
Wgeurts: I can also add, Vote Analysis is a quite powerful thing on later Days.
In post 126, Aneninen wrote:I thought that you might have backed preventively that you wouldn't do real scumhunting. But since it seems that I'm the only one who missed the joke. So, that post meant nothing, I suppose.
In post 138, Death Stare wrote:In post 135, Nero Cain wrote:1 post and that's counting your RVS...
Not mine.
The general game content.
In post 137, Aneninen wrote:Simply because I don't think anyone could have strong reads on anyone on the first couple of pages.
In post 152, davesaz wrote:other than perhaps the thought of the posts being empty-ish itself.
In post 154, sthar8 wrote:i'm waiting to expound until you've dug yourself a sufficient hole
In post 159, Nero Cain wrote:How do you feel about him and DS?
In post 165, wgeurts wrote:Also nero, I defended DS as it was looking like a blitz-wagon was going to start on him and we've only just started.
Kill him all I care but atleast first let him squirm
In post 172, wgeurts wrote:Also I went no lynch and barely defended DS, what did I do scummy to you?
In post 190, wgeurts wrote:In post 187, Nero Cain wrote:do you guys often d1 nl on your homesite?
Yes
In post 196, wgeurts wrote:Wait DS has 2 votes, suspicion rises.
In post 214, Heartless wrote:There's no questions about Nero Cain's play style directed at people who know him and there's no accompanying vote on Nero Cain to back up the accusations of empty "-ish" posting.
In post 234, davesaz wrote:Short and kinda joking (to me) posting style, making assertions but without much logic, not coming back to follow up on the comments. These are the type of posts which can be laughed off as not being really serious. In my experience, posting like this can be an indicator of scum being talkative to look active but not wanting to take a really big stand on anything that they can't back out of. It's not a very strong indicator, but it identifies you as someone to watch. Also a quick perusal of your iso shows that the majority of your posts lack a quote for context, thereby making them a bit more difficult for others to use with proper context. This leaves opportunities for using misrep claims as a defense.
In post 235, sthar8 wrote:woggerits has been all about the newbietells all game. Pretty obvious and clear newbie tells too. Like, newbietells 101. But I haven't seen anything scum-indicative from him. And Nero, at least, should be able to tell that wanting to no lynch and being afraid to vote are not scummy in the least coming from someone without an avatar. So, pretty basic low-hanging-fruit easy lynch hunting.
In post 238, Aneninen wrote:Nero, you asked something in 141 and I asked back in the next post. Do you still need an answer for or has it become obsolete by now?
In post 249, Aneninen wrote:why do you think that Davesaz is scum?
In post 281, davesaz wrote:In post 278, Nero Cain wrote:In post 249, Aneninen wrote:why do you think that Davesaz is scum?
I was mainly agreeing with anti-heart but his accusation that I was fluffy or didn't have any content or whatever is absolutely ridiculous.
There are accusations, votes, and combinations of the two. Accusations may be baseless, weak, or very strong. All of these are scum hunting methods designed to generate responses which may strengthen or weaken reads.
Whether people read my posting correctly, and how hard they try to push an incorrect read, are indicators too. The same applies to their reactions and approaches to other players.
In post 285, sthar8 wrote:As for the people pushing him, there's very little difference between "pushing the newbie because he won't know how to defend himself" and "bussing the newbie because he won't know how to defend himself"
In post 131, Nero Cain wrote:I kinda disliked his early trolling and cluttering up the thread
In post 114, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 104, Death Stare wrote:Even though you do this in basically every game ever, you jumped too early on asking for my reaction to my wagon. You should've waited until more votes piled up.
yeah, please get to dying. You are basically waving me off which I think is far more likely to come from scum then town and the wgwerts was all "STOP VOTING DS" so your "you jumped too early on asking for my reaction" really doesn't make sense in context of the gamestate.
In post 529, 50 Shades of Purple wrote:In post 525, Nero Cain wrote:I think Mollie is very likely scum 'cause townMollie doesn't town read townNero thus means is very likely to be scumMollie.
I read you as town in xmen you dummy.
LIKE I AM PRETTY FUCKING SURE I READ YOU AS TOWN ON D1 AND FOLLOWED UP YOUR LEADS!!!1!
nero is off the town table. no way would he misrep like that it is right there in the fucking thread
In post 585, Death Stare wrote:But honestly, I'm not really interested in talking with Nacho really anymore since at best we're just running in circles around each other.
-Ank
In post 590, davesaz wrote:I'm responding directly to the 50 shades vote.
In post 524, davesaz wrote:I don't see continuing comments on your stances or any attempt to follow up to prove the read or convince others of it.
In post 592, Aneninen wrote:In post 588, Nero Cain wrote:I don't know if 561, 563 and 565 make me want to climb in the fetal position and cry or pl the fuck out of wegurts.
Those are indeed anti-town but showing only laziness. I've already seen lazy players like that. Though, scum(s?) can do that too but in my opinion it wouldn't be a strong scumplay.
In post 593, massive wrote:Nero: "I mean, he voted no lynch when there's was no good reason to and then fear mongered that we "might lynch a special"." Fear-mongered is a pretty strong word, wouldn't you say? Maybe just a stretch? See it in action here: 78 OOH TERRIFYING
In post 594, Aneninen wrote:Do you think that certain players tend to give a free pass to Nero?
In post 525, Nero Cain wrote:I think Mollie is very likely scum 'cause townMollie doesn't town read townNero thus means is very likely to be scumMollie.
In post 599, Nero Cain wrote:As for Mollie, I DO think she is more likely to scum read me as town. Even the game that Mollie said she town read me in she was acting like I wasn't a town read for part of d1. Also Nacho is lurking and I think that's also likely to happen as scum
In post 603, Heartless wrote:Nero Cain: Please elaborate on your Death Stare scum read. I looked back at your activity and I get that you don't like their early "spam" and a few other isolated things, but what overall is giving you a scumread on that slot?
In post 606, Aneninen wrote:Do you think Wgeurts is scum?
In post 610, massive wrote:I think honestly it's the progression of your read on wguerts that is worrying to me. Unlike Monkey who immediately jumped on, your read has progressed from "hey, maybe they do it differently on someothersite.com" (122) to "I don't like being called bloodthirsty" (201) to "having a guy scum reaction" (334). AND on top of that, you try and tie your earlier wguerts opinion retroactively back into thinking he's scummy (see 525), when none of your earlier interaction with him reads as you thinking he's scummy at all.
In post 615, 50 Shades of Purple wrote:in this game I don't give a shit cos you are being a dick
In post 617, massive wrote:
It's a throwaway vote and you spend the whole post talking about how Death Stare is scummy and not wguerts. Are you saying you want us to believe you found wguerts legitimately scummy at this point?
In post 625, Heartless wrote:You don't know, as in you're not suspicious of Death Stare anymore or... what? This recent post makes me think you still think Death Stare is scum, that's why I even asked about it in the first place.
In post 628, 50 Shades of Purple wrote:Going "x player always calls me scum so player calling me town means they are scum" is bad reasoning unless you can back it up, which you can't,
In post 644, Aneninen wrote:Wait-oh. Have I misread Nero so far?
I've checked those posts and his votes. It seems that while he's voting for a player he keeps posting why another player is scum instead of giving arguments why the voted one is scum. Am I making out things of nothing again?
In post 644, Aneninen wrote:(1) how exactly could a newbie-scum play to "pro-standards"? Show me, where Wguerts suggested us "passing" him.
(2) as if towns never tried to prevent a policy lynch.
(By the way, most of us have never thought that we should policy lynch Wguerts.)
[/quote]In post 644, Aneninen wrote:Are you scumreading Massive too? Why? Because he scumreads you?
In post 705, davesaz wrote:Not to mention, who you're killing? Really?