Thanks! I think ... this is one of those "Not the welcome back you deserve but the welcome back you need" things, right?
Open 633: Near Vanilla-GAME OVER
-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
VOTE: Lowell for having I think the shortest possible post that contains a valid vote.
Thanks! I think ... this is one of those "Not the welcome back you deserve but the welcome back you need" things, right?
MOD - I'll be V/LA til Monday. Weekend family duties in all. Hopefully I can get a chance to check in."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
I’m wondering where the little lost sheep who have yet to post – SeshatX, KainTepes, Nosferatu – are?
In post 27, Lowell wrote:ABR, get in here and help me kill some newbs.
So Lowell do you usually buddy up to ABR? And just for kicks why aren’t you interested in having ABR’s slot help you lynch scum instead of pwning noobs?
Do you normally suggest policy lynches Day 1 as opposed to information based lynches?"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
In post 43, acryon wrote:
Who says it can't be both? And I also KT is a player that heavily disrupts the flow of information, so his death D1 is a win either way.
Well from the standpoint that Kain hasn't actually posted in this thread your call can't be anything but a policy lynch at this stage. Unless you want to own up that you have information that he is scum because he's your partner. Is that the case?"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
So you forgot about this game. And yet showed up 10 minutes after I mentioned it?
VOTE: Nosferatu"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
In post 46, acryon wrote:
No, but having played with him more than once, I don't think it would be absurd to say that his death early is almost as good, if not better, for town as a scum-death.
I hear your stance. I guess the original question remains - do you normally champion policy lynches Day 1? Or is this specific only to Kain?"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
In post 49, Nosferatu wrote:yeah I also hadn't read your post. Get over yourself.
So you are saying it was just pure coincidence that you showed up 10 minutes after someone specifically mentioned your lack of thread presence? I find it as suspect as anything else three pages into the game. Hell, it's not like you were V/LA or anything."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
In post 52, Nosferatu wrote:
Uh yeah, it was coincidence. You are not so strong a presence that I would go and post specifically becauseyousaid I wasn't here. I was posting in other threads, why do you think I would post there and not here?
Um why again do you keep making this about that I mentioned you specifically as the point? Had anyone mentioned your lack of presence and then you popped up 10 minutes later I would find it suspect. I mean is it possible you just plain forgot about this game? Sure, but it worth poking at regardless and your reaction of "Oh get over yourself you aren't that important" pings my gut as a bit outsized honestly.
So vote stays. Plus you are an undead monster out to drink our blood, right?"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
In post 59, jmo16mla wrote:In post 54, Lowell wrote:Magna is going to be annoying as hell, but, unfortunately, is town.
that was quick.
So what do you think that means then?"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
In post 63, OceanWind wrote:
1. Do you think Lowell's townread on you makes sense?
2. Why didn't you follow up on your previous question to Lowell?
In the context of what has gone on in thread - not really. Nothing exceeding Town to be found this early in any play.
As to why I didn't 'follow up' - no follow-up was really needed. My questions weren't really ones I expected Lowell to answer. He's one of two players in this list I have any sort of common game experience with. My questions were more to see how he would react. And react he did which is good as it is the start of actual content to read."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
VOTE: Acryon
Lacks any engagement in the game beyond the Policy Lynch issue. At this stage there is plenty to mine to start forming suspicions.
HeyOcean– why is it that you’ve read everyone’s ISO at 143 and yet I don’t see any mention of me at all in your reads list?
In post 136, Ollie wrote:acryon advocated a KainTepes policy lynch & has done nothing else.
And what does that mean to you? If you are suggesting it is scummy why didn’t you vote him? You unvoted Creeper at 149 and nothing between this post and that one should have changed your opinion on Creeper. And if it is not scummy why bother posting it at all?
In post 76, Bellaphant wrote:Mm, benefit of the doubt is he was waiting for a response from me, but it was super weird. Kt's defensiveness is not something I've seen from them, but I've played with them twice and were an easy mislynch once and a modkill the second time.
One of the votes on him is prolly scum.
If this is the case why aren’t telling us which player that most likely is?
In post 66, Imperium wrote:
I think that this is probably more likely to come from town than scum; it's pretty obviously an overreaction but KT is a newer player and I find that newer players tend to trend towards less words as scum, not more.
Paying more attention to yourself is a pretty common scumtell (playing for survival instead of playing to find scum); the only way this case works against Lowell is if you think that he is both aware of that tendency and that it would factor into his reads while pushing a page 2 read. I don't really think this is the case.
So do you find anything suspect about Lowell’s push on KT then? Because I find his summary of how things progressed to be at best a very slanted interpretation of Creeper’s response.
In post 79, Imperium wrote:This is probably the best point in thread so far.
See this is where you lose me. Because the most damning of the exchange at 22-25 between Bella and Ollie is not that it took him an hour after posting 24 to vote in 25. It’s that he only voted for Creeper at all because Bella repeatedly badgered him about his read. And Nosferatu doesn’t address that element in his 73 at all.
Why is the time delay more damning then what I pointed out?
In post 90, Lowell wrote:I'm also a little worried CoM might be scum. Which makes me sad. And that Killthestory might be town. Which makes me sadder.
In post 157, Lowell wrote:I'm starting to see the Ollie case, if for no other reason than his growing frustration that no one else is voting for obvtown killthestory like he wants us to. And yes, Ollie, I do normally sheep ABR. Because it's fun. You got a problem?
I have new leader now, though, and his name is killthestory. Obvtown. VOTE: CoM I tend to think team CoM would be having a little more fun were they down. I'm getting a bit of the deflated-after-receiving-scum-role vibe from them. Which I feel is especially pronounced in hydras.
So Kill being Town would make you sad. Nope nevermind he’s ObvTown and should be followed like a sheep. This makes no sense …
And the first part about Ollie being scummy for being frustrated that no-one is voting Kill is terrible logic since
1. Kill repeatedly asked people to vote him.
2. Ollie is clearly not pushing Kill but responding to his “Vote me” spam.
Hey Lowell are you scum? It’s ok you can be honest. No-one will think less of you for it."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
Um, ok.
Really though whether Bella said "Hey vote this person" is fairly irrelevant in the process in my mind. Bella repeatedly requested a real reason from Ollie for his suspicion of Creeper. Ollie only voted after giving his reasoning after being badgered. If you think Ollie is scum for waiting an hour to vote (which really a scum-tell as I see it) you have to think the fact that the only reason he gave said reasoning is because of Bella. Which is odd given the back and forth you had with Ollie regarding being questioned about reasoning on players and his general stance on you not giving it.
Do you disagree?"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
In post 164, acryon wrote:
I'll be honest that post was annoying enough to push me away but I'm not going to rob the town because you're being foolish.
SNIP other quotes for length’s sake …
-Killthestory is town.
-OceanWind is scum. Felt like jumping on the coat-tails of Ollie.
-Undecided on Nosferatu, and I'll admit I'm having a hard time because I think most of her accusers are very annoying.
-Not sure about Magna but his vote on me is truly terrible. The fact that anyone joined in on this absurd reasoning is insane. I have never one time seen someone use a content/activity argument based on the first 24-hour period of the game, and there is definitely a reason for that.
-ChurchOfMercy did ping me in 139. Certainly doesn't feel like ABR at all, just giving everyone a pass.
General thoughts: Several people going back and forth so much this early makes me think scum is going to have an easy time hiding this game. Also a PSA: Just because you've clogged up the game with 30 posts on D1 doesn't mean everyone can or should.
VOTE: OceanWind
Ding ding ding … vote stays. This is pure appeasement posting in an attempt to head further scrutiny.
Everyone who is interested take a look at Acryon’s ISO –
41 – Votes Kain Tepes for policy reasons.
43 / 46 / 53 – responding to my questions about his policy lynch stance.
Now that’s the first few pages. Maybe he just didn’t want to read the thread and comment on the Creeper early wagon and any of the play then. But later he returns for the following posts –
91 – Yet another response regarding his policy lynch stance, this time to Imperium.
93 – Pure fluff saying “I can’t say I will not screw up calling Kain Creeper and vice versa”
So there was nothing worth even discussing by Page 4? Not at all? I disagree.
But I call him out on lack of content and almost immediately – BAM – post both trying to undercut suspicion and get some content into thread."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
In post 177, acryon wrote:He actually seems to be jumping on low-hanging fruit and seems overly concerned with his standing amongst the town.
Hey it's put up or shut up time! In your next post you need to provide a quote that shows me being "overly concerned with his standing amongst the town".
GO!"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
In post 203, acryon wrote:
Oh I didn't see this but that's easy:
In post 60, MagnaofIllusion wrote:In post 59, jmo16mla wrote:In post 54, Lowell wrote:Magna is going to be annoying as hell, but, unfortunately, is town.
that was quick.
So what do you think that means then?
Indirectly about you, but still about you.
In post 160, MagnaofIllusion wrote:
HeyOcean– why is it that you’ve read everyone’s ISO at 143 and yet I don’t see any mention of me at all in your reads list?
That's interesting. Explain in more detail how you draw that conclusion - the first is quote where I'm asking jmolla for his conclusion on the matter. The second quote is a direct question to Ocean as to why he excluded me from a reads list. Both of which are clearly looking to assess other players by their analysis / lack of analysis as it were.
I like that you also gloss over my discussion with Imp where I make it clear that I don't think Lowell's Town read on me is reasonable. Which is exactly the opposite.
Vote absolutely stays."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
In post 207, acryon wrote:
What else you got? Oh and you don't have to keep telling me the vote is staying. I'll know when you take it off
What else do you think I need again? Your play has been suspect enough so far I'm satisfied you are a good place to vote scume. Lol, you act as if scum can't be caught purely because you only had 6 posts and it was in your first 24 hours of posting. Hint - scum can and do get caught early on. I can show you a game where I caught scum in their very first post of the game.
You fluffed through your posts until I called you out on it. Suddenly - WHAM - active Acryon. Scum reaction IMO."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
In post 209, acryon wrote:lol "you fluffed through your first 6 posts of the game and then once the game actually got going, BAM you are active. Scum. Got em." It's almost as if I contribute more when there is more to talk about and it isn't the literal first 24 hours of the game.
Now let's get back to actually finding scum.
You keep suggesting it was the first 24 hours of the game when I called you out. It clearly isn't. The game started on Saturday so it is at least 48 hours old when you made your first post. It may be your first 24 hours but there was 2 full days of dayplay to discuss when you first posted.
But once again - you act as if scum aren't caught right off the bat. It happens so blindly dismissing it isn't going to make you look less like scum."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
In post 223, Bellaphant wrote:In terms of votes on KT, iirc he was a day 1 mislynch the game I played with him, although I'm glad to say he's settled in a bit. I wasn't trying to be vague, 'one of the votes on him is scum and I'm not saying which', but 'due to my past experience with KT, I can easily see scum pushing a mislynch and with four votes, it's probable that one may be'.
My issue then is that you have done nothing to follow up on the Creeper wagon (other than your interactions with Ollie). Even if you are Town who doesn’t know for certain that Creeper is also Town I would think given your experience in the prior game you would think you would have pushed harder on those wagonners. As it stands you really didn’t even do much with Ollie.
In post 174, Ollie wrote:
ChurchofMercy- coulda tried to stick the knife in when I was coming under fire, but said they supported me with no messing about. Wants killthestory to scum hunt, join the club.
Why do you see it as something to Town read this slot for? In your argument you are Town. Who is in best position to stick up for a Town under early fire in your mind?
In post 215, Imperium wrote:I don't think it's fair to say that the only reason that Ollie voted for Creeper is because Bella badgered him about the read; I feel like it'd be more fair to say that Bella forced him to look seriously at KT. After all, the only commentary Ollie offered on KT when Bella asked him to play seriously was "he's creepy", which was obviously a joke: he could have said that he didn't have a read, and that would have been reasonable, or he could have offered a weak lean one way or another and done nothing about it and it still would have been reasonable. The reason that I thought that the observation about Ollie coming back and voting KT later was the best line of thought to follow in game because it meant that Ollie left the game, came back to the game, and noticed something that he didn't before. The reasoning that he offered (that he decided that adding pressure was better than not) makes sense; the possible scum motivation that I had in mind when pursuing was that he possible looked at the exchange between him and Bella and thought it looked a bit weak and added the vote to make his play line up with his words.
Does that make sense?
That I suppose is reasonable … and in a round-about way is more or less the read I got from that whole exchange. If anything this whole chain of discussion has been good for establishing a dynamic between Ollie and Bella that can be analyzed later as necessary.
In post 176, acryon wrote:Ugh I want to vote you very badly, but I fear you may just be overeager town.
So this I glossed over in our initial exchange but wanted to circle back to this. Are you suggesting my reasoning and vote for you was scummy? If so why are you afraid to vote for me? Because I see the “you are overeager Town” as an escape hatch you’ve built into this whole discussion so you can justify not calling me scum.
In post 191, acryon wrote:Hey you're super town and I am too. Just need to give me a minute.
For someone who dinged me for being “too concerned about his standing in the Town” this fits that to a tee. Cognitivie Dissonance anyone?
Another thing that I want to circle back to with Acryon –
In post 177, acryon wrote:He actually seems to be jumping on low-hanging fruit and seems overly concerned with his standing amongst the town.
This time I want to highlight the “Low hanging fruit” comment. He’s suggesting I’m attacking him for being a soft target for some reason. Yet he doesn’t see himself as one – he brags about not ever being lynched Day 1. So are we supposed to believe he is both simultaneously an easy target (intimating I am scum pushing on weak Town) and not one?
In post 207, acryon wrote:In the case of Ocean, there were plenty of things in his readslist you could have asked about, but instead were only interested in where you stood on it. If your goal was just to assess his analysis, why not start with what he did do and not what he didn't do? (which also happens to be about you)
Because the issue is not that he presented a reads list. The problem at hand is he supposedly took the time to do detailed ISO reviews and completely managed to miss one of the more active players in the game. Which to me on a gut level says the list is more likely to be fabricated than the result of actual work by a Town player. I’m not thrilled with his response which was “Meh, forgot you … you are Town” - smells of appeasement. But that doesn’t mean your misrep if ignored.
In post 244, ChurchOfMercy wrote:You guys, I'm known for being useless Day1, NAI. I'm more of a Day3 player.
Nope nope nope nope nope nope ….
In post 243, ChurchOfMercy wrote:Kain, on the other hand, has been pretty active elsewhere on the site today.
VOTE: KainTepes
In post 246, ChurchOfMercy wrote:If you have skills, please start using them. This hydra isn't Scum.
Bellaphant probably is.
So lack of engagement with the game isn’t a scum-tell. Yet you are voting Kain solely on that factor since he hasn’t posted here.
And you are calling Bella scum while not voting for her …
VOTE: ChurchofMercy
In post 250, Killthestory wrote:dude im literally too good.
church youre getting lynched today you scumlords
It would help if you’d vote for them again then Kill …"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
In post 254, acryon wrote:
I think the reasoning is terrible. But there is often a fine line between reasoning being bad and scummy, and that was toeing it.
There's a difference between jokingly and clearly mentioning it in passing as opposed to doing it in the form of a question as to not look like you're doing it.
At the time I was a low hanging fruit. I think once you get a closer look you'll realize I'm not, but that doesn't mean I wasn't at the time within the context of the game.
Eh can't help but disagree with you here. I don't think that means he fabricated it at all. If anything it's more likely to be real since if he made it up he probably would have just listed all the players and made comments. Easier to miss one if you're going through ISO's one by one and accidentally skip over a name.
1.So it could be either scummy or just "bad" (which of course I disagree with wholeheartedly, but that's academic for this discussion). So you can go either way with it depending on how you want to frame the discussion?
2. No not really. You may call it joking but it reads to me of trying to buddy up to one of your secondary detractors at that stage. Which is something someone worried about their position would do.
3. Um, whut? So you were Low Hanging Fruit but you are not? I can't wrap my head around the level of self-contradiction here. Either you are an easy target who can get pushed for questionable reasons or you aren't. The fact that you were trying to position yourself as such in a soft attempt to attack me I find suspect given your response here.
4. Agree to disagree on this."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
In post 256, acryon wrote:
2. Well I think it's very clear either way that it's a stretch to compare it to what I'm accusing you of, because they look completely different.
3. You're acting as if 1) perception doesn't matter and 2) status doesn't change. As for perception, being or not being low-hanging fruit has a lot to do with the overall town's perception of someone as such. Low-hanging fruit doesn't have a strict definition in mafia since the game is so fluid and differs so much from game to game. In the situation of me, I was a low-hanging fruit to you at the time because I hadn't had a real chance to even post something non-RVS yet you jumped on me for not doing so. Players are not strictly low-hanging fruit or not low-hanging fruit.
2. So you want to differentiate it enough that you can't be held accountable for Self-Contradictory play? Got it.
3. I'm acting as if you were using weasel language to attack me, that I called you out on it, and now the phrase "Low Hanging Fruit" is some nebulous, ever-changing concept that varies from post to post. Fact is that you were using language calculated to have a negative connotation (translated - MoI is attacking me because I'm an easy target) while not being able to justify how that stance makes any sense. If you were at that point as easy a target as you say then my vote on you would clearly not be using such "bad" logic as you keep claiming. You can't be have been simultaneously be an easy target and being attacked with terrible logic that wouldn't hold up to scrutiny at the same time."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
In post 258, Lowell wrote:@magna- that was a long-ass post to just say you agree with the wagon.
Lowell if you had bothered to actually read it you would have observed it is certainly more than just discussing the wagon on Church. But aside from your super Town read on Kill and CoM and Creeper is scum any other observations?"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
Could people PLEASE stop using KT as an abbreviation? I understand Kain got replaced but there is still plenty of room for misunderstanding between Creeper and Killthestory IMO. Thanks!
--
In post 267, OceanWind wrote:I don't have an issue with you asking me about why I left you off the list. But having a townread in not appeasement. If I was townreading you, why would I say anything else?
Also, I don't really understand what your issue is with Acryon saying that he is hard to lynch but that people might have attacked him thinking he was low-hanging fruit because he hadn't done much of anything in the first few pages.
I can understand that my statement may not sit well with you. Maybe if I explain more clearly you’ll understand my point of view. Just because you called me Town in response isn’t the reason that said I found your response somewhat suspect. Actually what triggered it for me was the response itself. I expected something along the lines of “Oh, I forgot. Let me look at your ISO” in your response. Later I would have expected a short post (or short part of a longer post) explaining the results of your ISO read. Keep in mind this may have happened behind the scenes and you just short-cut the process. Essentially your reply somewhat reinforced my concern which reads list post which caused my original question. Every player is going to have some posts I find suspect. Personally mostly I file them in my notes and mull them over as the day and game progresses.
As to not understanding Acryon – I don’t buy it at all. Low Hanging Fruit in my mind are players like Drmyshotty (I’m drawing on my last round of play back in 11/12) who were always an easy mislynch waiting to be pushed if they were Town. The closest we might have this game appears to Creeper and I would not put him in that category myself. Acryon’s post specifically used what I see as charged language in a situation where it isn’t even close to appropriate IMO. Add in that I was already scum-reading him for prior play, simmer over a fire and the resulting recipie is a fine scum stew from my persepective.
--
Can I add the whole “backfoot” discussion is really absurd? I don’t see what Acryon is claiming at all in the Nosferatu and Ollie discussion in regards to either Nos being on the defensive or it being a 1v1 conversation that is scummy to comment on.
--
In post 301, ChurchOfMercy wrote:Have you played any games with Kain? There's a difference between lack of engagement and not bothering to show up at all.
"And you are calling Bella scum while not voting for her …"
Be-cause ... we ... are ... vo-ting ... for ... Kain. Derp.
Um enlighten me – how is not showing up to a game more indicative of having received a scum role Pm than giving low effort? I’d really like to know. For the record – never had the pleasure of playing with Kain.
I’m dinging you on not voting Bella while calling her scum because you are calling Bella scum for things that actually happened in thread while voting Kain for being completely absent. Unless you have some big explanation for me about that being a scum-tell I don’t quite see that a Town oriented thought process.
In post 312, Severa wrote:I am fine with a ChurchOfMercy lynch today.
I'm diffident about whether to read through for other scumreads as well before seeing the flip.
So to be clear - are you calling church scum or just want them lynched because they voted Kain?
In post 317, Severa wrote:Nothing is scummy about it at all because if I were scum I wouldn't care about the flip!
#bestlogic
Is this comedy? I hope this is comedy."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
In post 340, KTthecreeper wrote:Hello sorry I haven't been on in the past few days, some things popped up
So I'm going to read the thread a few times and make a read list on my thought so far
This I would like to see.
In post 344, Jim wrote:I'm not particularly sure this tell is something we should be chasing rather than trying to sort out what has already been occurring. Why did you choose to ignore taking a side on the KT and Lowell debacle?
Because I don’t see an RVS wagon and Creeper’s response to be meaningful to alignment in any way IMO. And Lowell … he’s Lowell. I don’t expect high levels of engagement or strong logical play. So seeing that attack out of him reads as flat Null to me. Personally I think you are reading way too much into Creeper’s post as an exercise in “faking” Town easy going nature. It was a single vote that prompted it. Why exactly do you think he would need to fake a Town attitude off a single RVS vote?
In post 344, Jim wrote:Is this a common scum tactic you've seen? Turning around immediately after they are called out for doing or not doing something to then right the wrong and abate some of the suspicion? Forgive me, but I fail to see what scum would ever do something like that.
You are forgiven. But in all seriousness – for a large swath of scum appeasement style posts I find to generally be a good tell to go with. You in this post also mention several instances of appeasement posting (ex: Ollie’s vote on Creeper after Bella interaction). I find these type of “get mentioned and come running” posts to be a variant on appeasement posting.
Now there are several strata of player-types that doesn’t work for. Mainly the super-boastful and the well seasoned vets. Luckily we don’t have the worst style of offender in this game for the former and I purposefully didn’t bother even trying that sort of poking and prodding on the later in this game.
In post 352, Imperium wrote:Magna, what is your read on jmo?
Null. He’s pretty much non-engaged. I don’t give any ‘dumb Town’ credit for 32-33 but it certainly doesn’t warrant scum-points either. I can see why, if he doesn’t know Lowell from Adam, Lowell’s call of me as Town early would be suspect. 62 is full of logical Town oriented thinking. His line of thinking in 179 and 206 about scum being in best position to call other players Town on little basis is a theory I believe in personally. Hell, if not for the fact that he is very non-engaged (other than going after Lowell and Killthestory) I’d probably be very comfortable with a fairly solid Town read on the slot."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
In post 359, Imperium wrote:
This makes sense; I guess that my scumread on him was mostly founded on previous experience with him (he's not usually this disconnected from a game) and thought maybe that OW's townread on jmo was him protecting a scumpartner in a better position than Church, but now I'm coming around to the fact that I'm probably getting too ahead of myself, hence not minding this Day going a bit longer so I can get a better bead on some of the lower volume posters.
I understand this but a quick glance at that link shows it is like 3 years old. Not to say that it might not be a valid observation - we haven't really seen enough of jmo to make a firm opinion IMO - but I wouldn't feel comfortable leaning on it as of now.
What do you know of Klingon? I'd like your thoughts on the whole "Kain is scum for not showing up but low engagement is not a scum-tell" thing. Because that causes my alarm klaxons to go ringing big-time. Am I overthinking?"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
371 is a nice feature that I think got added during my long haitus. Thanks, I’ll use it!
In post 363, Killthestory wrote:VOTE: Jim
In post 375, Killthestory wrote:man CoM should die just for the sake of being annoying
Cool story bro! Or are just waiting to hammer if he’s put back at L-1?
In post 373, ChurchOfMercy wrote:Here, let me help you with that:
Low-volume means volume, just not a lot of it. Some players actually make just one or two short posts per day on this site. The posts generally contain some content.
This is opposed to a flake, someone that completely ignores the game.
How can you not see that the flake is clearly scummier than the low-volume?
Let me help you then – you haven’t established in any degree that flaking from a game before making a single post is in any way related to alignment. End of story. So no matter what else you want to say on the matter until you can provide copious links to this site where repeatedly and consistently someone flaking without making a single game post is indicative of a scum role PM I’m not going to buy your vote makes any Town perspective sense.
Long Story Short – Voting for a player without a single post to judge for content as opposed to a player you call scum for in-game posting without any logical base to do so is scumtastic.
In post 364, Jim wrote:Newer scum players sometimes have issues immersing themselves in a game. Given that RVS is predominately injokes and sarcasm, that's often viewed as the best way to get into a game. The vote's not the cause for it, the immersion is.
Meh. RVS is whatever you make of it in my mind. But you point I can see from an experienced perspective. Care to share your main?"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
MOD – I’ll be V/LA from around 1 today until Monday morning for normal weekend family duties.
Creeper and Jmo not following through with their reads-list / catchup I find annoying. There is no excuse at this point not to be contributing to finding scum. If you guys are Town you are doing it wrong.
In post 426, Severa wrote:Severa has explained her scumread on the ABR/Klingon hydra!
Focus must not be diverted. Let's lynch scum, kay?
Severa has not provided input on anyone else in the game. This is very suspect. Reads list pronto!
In post 396, Jim wrote:I would like to end the day shortly after KT gives us his reads list.
Any particular reason?
In post 405, Jim wrote:I attributed my discrepancies with him to Lowell by mistake.
Um, what? You somehow mixed up Lowell and myself? How does that even happen given we are pretty much antithetical to each other’s playstyle? Maybe Imperium or Ocean I could see. But Lowell? I don’t find this as credible.
In post 405, Jim wrote:Upon reading back, I realize I was mixing up people. That being said, I need to rearrange some of my list. It's Ollie and Magna, and the reason is because they were using the same strategy to approach the game, where it makes sense for one to be scum but not both.
Knowing you are an experienced alt this strikes me as highly suspect. Playstyle does not dictate alignment. There is no reason to assume two players with similar playstyles could not both have drawn scum.
Why don’t you repost you ‘corrected’ reads list, hmmmm? I’d like to see where your reads actually are supposed to be.
In post 400, ChurchOfMercy wrote:You've been here 4 years longer than I and you don't know site or player meta? Hmph.
Some players are known for playing like trolls.
Let's just say certain ones are more likely to disappear when they roll Scum.
Given you’ve already stipulated you understand Kain site-flaked I’m curious – do you think he just decided he was scum in every game and decided to stop playing on Mafiascum?
And I’d love some links to support your premise. You haven’t shown me anything other than generic platitudes that do jack crap to support your supposed position. Now I know doing work is hard for scum …
In post 413, Killthestory wrote:VOTE: Bellaphant
Everyone get the fuck off Com before I fucking deathtunnel you
CoM does flip scum and this is where I’m going next. I could see Kill bussing CoM for underperforming, realizing that there was no significant pressure elsewhere and deciding that he wasn’t going to get enough Town cred to make the bus worthwhile."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
In post 446, Killthestory wrote:Are you fucking stupid? I was the one who started the CoM fucking wagon and put the most pressure on him. I just feel he's town, and that Bella is definitely scum
Nope. Can you read what I wrote? Because I find it pretty clear. I don't see any reason at all for you to have pushed them as scum for so long and then quietly said "Derp, nevermind they are Town" with nothing from the slot that reasonably changes your mind. Let me guess - gut I know right?
I like the fact that you address me here like Town who is stupid, as opposed to scum who is partners with Bella and Ocean like your said earlier. Did you forget you said that?"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
Here’s a quick narrative for anyone who has questions about Church. Read only with their ISO and you can see why they need rope –
“Hey let’s jump on Creeper wagon for clearly terrible reasons.”
“Um I’m going to attack Killthestory as being bad at this game for suspecting me.”
“Hey here’s some pointless self-meta …”
“Ok now I’m going to vote someone who hasn’t made a single post in this game and site-flaked while softly suspecting Bella”
“Ok now scum is Imperium, Kill, and someone unnamed.”
“Tons of AtE and sarcasm with not a lick of scum-hunting. People love that.”
“Kill you are terrible you can’t even catch a single scum.”
“More AtE and calling Town stupid and noob”
At this point Killthestory reverses gears and calls CoM bad Town and calls Bellaphant scum.
“OMG Kill is aweseome Bella is scum one down two to go”
It really is pretty telling that CoM spent every minute up to the point where Kill reversed fields calling Kill out as bad (and sometimes Mafia sometimes not) but the minute that Kill gives a ray of hope suddenly CoM is 100% onboard with Kill as great at this game.
Also note how softly Bella is suspected by CoM – that flows in and out of their reads (sometimes Bella is Null-Town) and never is Bella the best bet for a lynch. Classic case of soft distancing. CoM flipping scum makes Bella a great choice Day 2.
--
In post 455, Killthestory wrote:the way she's playing feels scum. i dont know why, but it does.
and if i try to put it into words here it wouldn't make sense or wouldn't be enough to push her lynch
Sorry, not derailing the Church wagon for random gut. Given how soft-distanced CoM has set themselves up with Bella you’d have my 100% support if CoM flips scum today though.
In post 469, OceanWind wrote:Are you saying that you think Jim made up that explanation after the fact?
It’s possible. I don’t buy for a second anyone mixed up our slots. No playstyle intersection, no avatar confusion and there was significant discussion around Lowell’s early Town-read of me that several people found suspect. Do you think it is a reasonable mix-up to have made?
In post 491, acryon wrote:I don't like this at all. At least one of these is bad. It doesn't make sense for it to be KTS at this point and I still feel like he's town, so my voting intent stays on CoM.
Yet your vote isn’t on him and has never been on him based on your ISO. Church’s wagon is just sitting at L-2 and lack of push to actually complete the lynch has taken over this thread.
Why are you not voting him?
In post 471, Imperium wrote:In 349, I asked CoM to join me in making a jmo push. Albert said that he'd talk to Klingon about it, and then never brought it up again.
I found this interaction as far more likely to be indicative of partners than Killthestory suddenly deciding to not scum read Church for unknown reasons, especially considering how CoM followed Killthestory onto Bella and egged him on in the way that they did; I think CoM would be more careful to tie themselves to a partner in a strong position, especially if Killthestory decided that he was going to stop bussing them for a little while.
I didn’t really suspect them as partners. That was done solely to see what Kill’s reaction would be. I’m satisfied that Kill’s reaction doesn’t seem likely to come from a partner at this stage.
And I disagree with the jmo – CoM connection for reasons we previously discussed. If anything Bella in my mind is a very strong bet for partner given the soft distancing the CoM slot has done from them. I mean look at 483 … CoM’s vote is on Bella after the “WE GOTTEM” post but Bella is the second person who needs flipped after CoM is lynched and not the first?"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
In post 495, Severa wrote:MoI and KTS are just both such... intolerable players.
Sure, whatever floats your boat.
Since you are here - who else beside Church is scum? Who are your Town reads?"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
In post 507, Xisiqomelir wrote:I approve of Lowell, Imperium and MoI on the COM wagon, ergo I approve of the wagon itself, but I believe there is still ample time to probe various posters' opinions.
This post lacks the affirmative stance that you think CoM is actually scum. Please share in a positive manner with the class if that is the case. Especially given that you are voting Kill."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
In post 510, Xisiqomelir wrote:
Yes, they are strongly possible scum and I am willing to vote them once the deadline drops to 3 days.
As a player here since the beginning I would like to ask you what behaviours and stances you think I should pay attention to as I look at this thread.
The thread is only 21 pages long. I don't think a full re-read is out of the question. I want you paying attention to every post looking for scum."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
I wonder where Jim got to. Especially since he was keen on completing the CoM lynch soon after Creeper returned with reads. And isn’t voting.
In post 528, SnarkySnowman wrote:ChurchofMercy is interesting, because I see a lot of associatives with them (and a lot of info to be gained from that lynch), but I don't necessarily think they're scum, so I'd like to consider. Let me read that one a little more thoroughly.
Severa, on the other hand, has done almost nothing and I feel like that's a particularly worthy lynch, if we run up against it. Also, UNVOTE:
The only way associations are meaningful is if the flipped party is scum. I’d really like for you to complete your read and give us your CoM thoughts.
In post 532, Nosferatu wrote:I fail to see how this is her hedging.
You do? Please explain why repeatedly saying that there is scum on a wagon but doing nothing in relation to tracking down said scum from their play re: the wagon isn’t hedging against giving actual reads.
In post 561, Xisiqomelir wrote:I know MoI pretty well. He is equally querulous and irascible as both town and other alignments, but is more likely as town than scum to make posts like:
Your approach I like but you get demerits for the use of the word “querulous”. Bad Xisi."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
In post 568, Nosferatu wrote:I only saw her say there was scum on the kt wagon once, but saying there's scum on a wagon and not identifying scum on the wagon isn't hedging. It's not following through.
Do you normally take this “strict” a language approach to this game. Because it looks like you are stretching so hard to just argue against the point I made. You say it is not following through. But Bella made the statement and despite multiple requests from myself to actually commit to working that angle she has refused. So I find it realistically likely she is more likely to be scum for quite possible not actually believing what she said. Do you disagree?
In post 583, Nosferatu wrote:It's hard reading read progression of hydras when I don't know who is who.
The do what you should do from the start – treat the slot as a single player. Hydra dissonance isn’t something to excuse. Hydras need to coordinate their crap behind the scenes or be prepared to be held to the fire if they contradict each other.
In post 571, Lowell wrote:^^^ this is a scummy post
Insert facepalm smilie here …
In post 576, Severa wrote:I'm incredibly skeptical of SnarkySnowman putting me as sole confirmed scum with current levels of content from my slot.
Feels like an attempt to generate a counterwagon. CoM flips scum that's my first priority.
So what is the take-away here? Are you stating that your slot has such a lack of content it is impossible for someone to draw a realistic scum-read on you?"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
MOD – I’ll be V/LA from approximately 5pm today until Monday morning for my usual weekend family duties.
The fact that we’ve had such trouble getting Church to L-1 in the first place combined with this sudden very, very late day counter-wagon building makes me feel even better about the CoM lynch.
In post 620, Severa wrote:Stop lynching CoM today please.
Nope.
In post 619, Severa wrote:I'm saying that you /can't legitimately be scumhunting/ because you wouldn't come to me as your sole scumread based on that.
Um why not? Frankly your reaction is a bit outsized for my tastes.
You replaced a flaked slot with no posts. You hop on the leading wagon with no reasoning other than “CoM is scum” and have done NO scum-hunting despite there being a thread full of content to discuss. Not hard to see your slot as a strong scum candidate – I certainly do.
Especially in light of the whole “CoM is scum but I think Snarky is a much more interesting wagon. And the subsequent "Stop lynching CoM". Which reads as a last ditch effort to derail the CoM wagon to me.
Also the following –
In post 596, Severa wrote:For the record, 'day 3 player' is another way of saying 'I can't scumhunt without associatives!'
In post 619, Severa wrote:Yes, I have not given a strong read on anyone besides the two of you. I don't have a strong read on anyone besides the two of you. I scumread CoM, he's getting lynched, I'm in no rush to do massive reading with no flip.
Banging on Klingon for “not being able to hunt without associations” and then saying “nah, I don’t want to do a big read until we have flips (and therefore associations)” is self-contradiction and scummy."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
In post 640, Severa wrote:
If I wanted to derail the CoM wagon I'd have done it long before he was at L-1.
That's funny considering you replaced in with CoM at L-2. But please keep on keeping on with the flailing to save CoM."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
In post 644, Severa wrote:Are you just insipidly foolish or scum?
I mean I know you're insipidly foolish but are you scum as well?
SS basically scumclaimed and I want to lynch him. I would have absolutely no issues going back and lynching CoM after a SS lynch.
But that's my priority at this time because SS is 100% scum whereas CoM is only like 85%ish.
Well no. Sorry but disagreeing with your view doesn't result in that binary output. But this is the second time your reaction to someone challenging or accusing you is "LOLZ YUZ SCUM OR STUPID YO". Which doesn't generally make me think even if you are Town that I should hold your views in high regard.
The last two sentences are buzzword bingo which, ironically, is something you yourself just accused Snarky of doing in regards to you.
CoM is getting lynched today. Sorry if your last minute attempt to derail that is destined to fail."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
In post 646, Severa wrote:If CoM flips town doc me so I can powerlynch this and SS.
This is the most blatant chainsaw I've seen in my life.
Lol. Just lol."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
Imperium is so Town it hurts. Any concerns I might have had in the deep recesses of my mind have been washed away in the avalanche of their posting the last 24 hours.
I am also highly suspect of the pool of players saying "I think CoM is scum with [insert player of choice], I just want [player] lynched first for [reasons that make no sense]". Imperium has nailed it right on the head - CoM's play has been scummy and they have done nothing but AtE and Appeal to Fear and try to hop on whatever lifeline alternate wagon may present (Bella, Snarky). Their "Creeper is scum for that reaction" then followup with "Creeper is low hanging fruit" should be enough to convince you that they aren't actually trying to make reads but are manufacturing statements to fit the game-state.
If the thread is still open when I get back from V/LA I will have to address several of Ocean's posts because my quick read-through shows me several things I find suspect."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
In post 973, Nosferatu wrote::v I'll hammer if no objections to waiting
Could you give me an hour - very busy today. Thanks!"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
In post 657, OceanWind wrote:We had no trouble getting ChurchOfMercy up to L-1. People kept unvoting because they didn't want them in hammer range but for the vast majority of the day, ChurchOfMercy was the default lynch option. It's only now that another option emerged. What trouble are you talking about?
See this is the kind of response that drive me nuts. Why would you not want someone you read as scum not within hammering range? Especially when the game Day is well past 3/4ths done. I’m sorry but that sort of ‘caution’ is just an exercise in thread inflation. The thread has blossomed from 27 pages when I went V/LA to 40 now. And I will argue with you as much as you want that this hardly constitutes a benefit to Town – a good portion of the thread in that page range is more or less noise IMO.
So another lynch option has emerged? So what. Are you saying it is a better lynch option than CoM. I disagree completely. CoM has been scummy this entire day. But let me address the “lack of depth” accusation you’ve been throwing my way multiple times since I went V/LA. How is my CoM read lacking in depth?
There is nothing in CoM’s ISO that indicates they are actually interested in finding scum. Let’s talk about the many ways this is evident.
1. The contradiction of jumping on Creeper’s wagon but later in the day Town reading the slot as “low hanging fruit”.
2. The insistence in voting the Kain slot (who had not posted in thread) over the claimed scum Bella slot (who actually had posted in thread) with the justification that Kain was obviously more scummy for having flaked yet not being able to support that position with anything other than “you don’t know site meta”.
3. Alternating waves of pointless sarcasm, claiming scum and Appeals to Emotion and Fear.
4. Hopping on every wagon that looks to save their own necks with that being the sole justification.
5. Complete void of scum-hunting from the slot.
Again – this is a summary. Do you disagree with my statements here?
I’ll continue with my discussion of your “lack of depth when we discuss my Severa read.
In post 657, OceanWind wrote:Are you saying Severa is mafia with ChurchOfMercy or that he's mafia in the event ChurchOfMercy flips town? If the former, do you think he was bussing?
My townread on him comes from how he reacted to the case on him. The sudden aggression looked like town that thought they finally found something strong to push on. Severa wasn't in any real danger of being lynched so I don't know why he as mafia would panic at SnarkySnowman catching him and push back hard rather than stay on the bus/mislynch of ChurchOfMercy and put off Snarky for the following day.
Yes I’m saying I think Severa makes a reasonable candidate for scum with CoM. But let’s get back to my “lack of depth” of read. Bring up Severa’s ISO and read along.
Severa replaces in and her first posts 296, 302and 302 are all more or less fluff. In 302 she suggests she’s OK with the CoM wagon. More short, contently posts follow without a vote until finally we get a vote at 337. Here next handful of posts are more fluff basically re-iterating her vote on CoM. In fact her first alignment indicative post about anyone other than CoM is 576 where she makes suggests Snarky is scum with CoM and is trying to generate a counter-wagon on her.
To this point I see a player who has hopped on the dominant wagon with little reasoning and isn’t looking at anyone from a scum hunting perspective how doesn’t address her. In fact during this period I asked her for reads (see 445 as example) which she dutifully ignored. This ISO doesn’t read as Town looking to find scum. It reads very much to me as possible bussing partner.
612 is her first vote-switch to Snarky. Her reasoning is basically superficial – he doesn’t have reason for thinking Severa is scum. CoM is still scum “on principal” at this point but now Snarky could be scum with them or scum wanting to line up a mislynch on Severa. Her next post is a vote back to CoM and claiming Snarky and CoM are buddies.
Again through here we see no interest in looking at anyone other than the one player calling her scum. She still fails to interact with CoM in any meaningful fashion.
618 is her post where she justifies her vote move back Snarkly because “the wagon is more interesting”. This is where my scumdar really started triggering on her. The justification of moving from a solid wagon to start a new one on a supposed CoM because it “is more interesting” is very scummy. Note this is before Snarky’s actual case was made.
Snarky makes his case at 613. Is it great? Nope. But it does absolutely valid points. His point about post 312 I agree with as evidenced above. His point that Severa was “de-railing” the case made by Kill on Bella was pretty nonsensical. But that doesn’t make it scummy. And the thrust of his Bella / Severa discussion is revolves around the fact that Severa isn’t willing to look at Bella at all through the prism of someone looking for other scum. And he was absolutely right on that issue – as I noted above Severa had gone out of her way to refuse to look at anyone besides CoM and Snarky. Generally a ham-handed presentation but with valid points.
From this point Severa latches onto Snarky and begins the attempt to move the wagon from CoM to Snarky. 620 is a direct request to stop lynching CoM simply because Snarky is scum. She further now starts to inject doubt about CoM as scum at 621 by suggesting that Snarky is scum regardless of CoM’s alignment. She continues to straddle the fence on CoM at 631
This is where I began to seriously consider Severa as a possible partner for CoM. Because many of the accusations she throws at JMO I’ve highlighted above as exactly what she was doing – no scum-hunting or any desire to actually discern alignments. But now thanks to Snarky’s case there is something for her to try and exploit as scum behavior aside from CoM’s scum play. And when I question her about trying to derail the CoM wagon she either tries to shrug it off “I would have done it much earlier” or calls me scum chainsawing for Snarky.
This is more or less exactly where I went V/LA.
I see an experienced partner hiding behind an alt (which was clear from her comments and she does not deny) who saw an opening to push a counterwagon to a partner and took it. Of course if CoM is by some reason not scum that associative tell goes out the window.
But again to address my point – how exactly does my read “lack depth”. Just because I lack time on the weekends to generate a large post like this doesn’t mean I’m not thinking about my stances."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
Wow. An hour to the minute to produce that one response. I'm sifting through the noise from this weekend. I'll post as I can but feel free to hammer CoM. I don't want any shenanigans surrounding the wait for deadline."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
VOTE: Killthestory
This is where I am starting with my vote today. Honestly his play at the tail of yesterday shifted into coasting with no real push on anyone as scum. Just fluff like “Lol if I’m wrong I’m deathtunnelling myself tomorrow”. His jump off CoM with no significant reasons to be seen could certainly be scum wanting to not be held accountable for the mislynch on CoM that he helped drive in the inital stages of the wagon. Finally – he’s one of the two player Xis really had suspicions of besides CoM (Snarky is the other) and while Nightkill speculation is just speculation I don’t see any dropped hints in Xis’s ISO that say PR breadcrumbing.
@Ocean– in regards to 987 I have some questions –
1. Why did my case seem compelling enough to help shift your read on Severa given that the main thrust of my case revolved around Severa as a partner? I have my doubts that scum would replace in and just weakly slide on a mislynch of CoM the way she did. So while the case may be well developed I personally don’t find it nearly compelling give CoM’s flip.
2. What motivated your change overnight about your belief in the strength of Snarky as scum?
I’m appalled you haven’t even bothered to vote Snarky at all today. Why exactly is that?
In post 988, SnarkySnowman wrote:VOTE: Severa
Nothing has really changed for me overnight. This still needs rope.
So you are saying nothing about CoM flipping Town or Xis flipping Town changed your reads in any way at all?
Here are your reads from before -
In post 528, SnarkySnowman wrote:Town {MagnaofIllusion, Oceanwind, Ollie}
Townlean {Bellephant, Jim, acryon, Killthestory}
Scumlean {Lowell, Imperium, Nosferatu, ChurchofMercy}
Scum {Severa}
First I notice you never gave a read on Xis’s slot. Why was that? Second if Severa is scum who do you think are her partners are? Church as flipped Town so your initial posted scum-leans were Imperium, Nos and Lowell."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
In post 1021, SnarkySnowman wrote:Can we all stop dragging our feet and vote Severa?
Why exactly are you rushing the day again? Thread has been open for what, 24 hours? I personally want to see what Imperium has to say after the flip. And several other players haven’t checked in either.
Here’s a task to keep you busy – resummarize your case on Severa highlighting the two strongest pieces of evidence you think proves she’s scum.
In post 1015, Bellaphant wrote:Can you explain this for me? Last I heard, com was 'bussing' me.
Like, you've never explained this.
@Sev, I asked you a bunch of questions yesterday and you said you weren't interested in talking. You gonna bother now?
Hey Bella whole lot of empty posting from your slot. Who are your top three scum-reads with reasons why – go!
In post 1017, Killthestory wrote:MoI is the worst scumhunter I've ever met. Well, maybe just pretty bad.
Also, Several still scum. Way too easy to see
See perfectly reminiscent of the lazy, disconnected posting of his recent Werewolves Mini (where he was a serial killer) as opposed to his posting in Formation of America’s Mafiascum (where he was Town). Both share his style but Formation showed him wiling to present reasons why people were scum and comment on things not related to himself.
Happy with my vote.
Although given the weak distancing Kill displayed to Severa Day 1 without ever voting for her I could see them as possible partners. Read his ISO. He calls Severa scum or possible scum multiple times but after his jump off CoM never votes her. Just idled his vote with “want to hammer” stance."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
To this I say - Lol. You need an alt. Calling me terrible makes my day."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
MOD I will be V/LA from 5pm EDT today until Monday for my normal family weekend duties.
In post 1029, OceanWind wrote:I'd appreciate comments on my case.
Sure –
I’m not going to quote 987 in full as that would just be a cluster for people to scroll through. On your points –
1. Chaining Mislynches – on a whole I can see and agree with this point. Severa does exhibit multiple instances of either trying to tie players to fault for the CoM lynch (which in the end she actually supported) or attempting to get Snarky to be the delegated lynch for today. Certainly could be the case that she felt Snarky was an easier push than myself or Imperium.
2. Setting up conflict between Imperium and yourself – could certainly be scum motivated assuming both of you are Town – dividing Town via exploiting personality conflicts is a pretty standard scum tool.
3. Burdon of Prociency – probably the weakest part of your case. What you quoted from 893 is probably the closest I’ve seen to Severa not screaming “I’m the best” given the phrase “But if we’re going to be doing this forever and you won’t be hitting scum for it I’ll start to have a problem” contains if and start to have as context providers.
4. Chainsawing – I agree that was just plain terrible on Severa’s part. 50 / 50 on whether it is scum trying to play buzz-word bingo or just her ego showing.
I can see the merits. Actually your Alone case is pretty compelling also. He’s basically done nothing the since replacing in other than sheep the dominant wagon and the reasoning in 1003 is pretty scummy."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
Back from V/LA –
I’m not sure why everyone would have a Town read on Kill’s slot. 1041 is a perfect example of what I was talking about and the pages 43-44 ego-measuring exchange with Radiant is nothing but noise and blather. He’s just cruising by. Mostly curious why Radiant isn’t paying attention though. Especially 1067 which reads as “Crap … do I jump off and or stick to my guns on this read” upon realizing it is Radiant behind the mask which is a scum thought process if Radiant is Town.
In post 1062, Imperium wrote:Also I am reminded that yesterday nacho thought that severa outing her alt to us looked townish.
Nacho needs to explain why outing an alt is Townish because I see it as completely devoid of any alignment connotations. Either Radaint scum or Radiant Town was not being listened to and coming under fire today led to the reveal which is survivalist (also not alignment indicative). So I’d like to grok the logic behind that Town read.
In post 1170, Imperium wrote:But. Ranger would have no idea what Magna's scum game or town game looked like. He's been gone since 2012 and just came back. He doesn't have a finished game to his name since Ranger has been around.
Yeah, this. Ranger would, of course, certainly know I’m not her partner and thus be happy to throw so “Oh, I can read MoI” into the mix.
In post 1133, Ranger wrote:I'm starting my readthrough now, but I think Drunk RC is town and I think that if he's calling SS a scummy scumperson, SnarkySnowman was probably a scummy scumperson.
Willing to just accept on a single post Radiant’s word without reading the thread at all. Scum-tastic.
So Ranger – how many times as Radiant scum fooled you? Just curious.
In post 1156, Ranger wrote:I know, according to the wiki, that means I'm one scumread short. It also means I'm townreading one player I shouldn't be. That's what the remaining 12 pages are hopefully for.
This is very forced. Pre-explaining why she doesn’t have the requisite number of scum in her reads-list is the kind of posting scum think to make in advance.
I’d really like to see any explanation for this. Really … all ears."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
In post 1186, Imperium wrote:Magna - This is what Nacho was referencing. I played with RC in newbie 1672 a couple months ago. He outed himself to me here, which Nacho thought was townish.
I don't agree with the practice as I think if you're going to play as an alt, you should play as an alt either secret to everyone or public to everyone and not out meta knowledge you wouldn't know.
But, outing that to me did let us know who he was right off the bat and therefore we had knowledge of his play style we wouldn't have otherwise. Nacho will probably explain this better though.
See that I find scummy. It was pretty clear he was an alt early on. His comment on Klingon always scum reading him makes little sense when the slot has no posts not in this game. Hiding behind an alt (which Radiant has already claimed he was doing - look at his interaction with Ollie on that front) while selectively trying to communicate to certain players reads as wanting a play-style pass for behaviors from said subset of players to my mind is pandering - similar to what Lowell was knocked for in "gathering up allies".
I'd still like elaboration from Nacho."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
In post 1199, Killthestory wrote:lol at all these sudden scumreads
How does this not have more votes? Seriously …
In post 1197, Imperium wrote:You're acting like you're not a well-established player recreating herself under a new alt. Everyone knows who you are, and no matter how much you deny it when people point it out to you and your main, you keep making posts like this that betray the fact that you have been here for years.
I don’t. Clue me in. If it is someone I should know then it could have a significant impact on my assessment of Ranger.
Is it Faraday?
In post 1195, Ranger wrote:While it's true, he hasn't been as, shall we say, aggressive as is typical of his town game, the way he acknowledged it felt town to me as well. I got the impression his "I don't really care" attitude was still present, just in a more laid-back, casual manner. When he has pushed, his pushes look like they're in that specific mind set, one of, essentially, "I'm not doing much, but this feels right, and I don't care what others think of it". Admittedly, I don't have too many games with Killthestory, like three or so town games and one scum game, but this simply...doesn't feel the same as what he did in Longnight.
Yeah, no. This looks very much like a “I’ll give my partner a pass on meta” posting to me.
In post 1195, Ranger wrote:I get that you don't like the idea of some random player being able to peg you, but...
I can peg you.
And you're not scum this game.
I'm even more sure of it now.
You seem to be not understanding – I don’t care what your stance is on whether you can”peg” me or not. It is irrelevant. I think your slot is scum. Very easy to claim a Town read on me based on fluff “meta and stuff” in an Open Set-up when you know going in who is Town and who is not.
In post 1195, Ranger wrote:Wrong. I cannot explain why at this time, but RC's description of SnarkySnowman's behavior made me want to vote SnarkySnowman, for a very specific reason. As in, very, very, VERY specific reason. I wish I could tell you now. I probably will be able to tell you before this game's over, maybe not by the end of this game day but probably before this game would end, and when I can tell you I have every intention to because this was actually one of the reasons why I scumread SnarkySnowman in the first place and it's very frustrating that I can't tell you why yet.
So you are telling me to just trust you …. I can’t say I feel inclined to do so at this point.
In post 1195, Ranger wrote:Because if I was scum, I'd know who my scumteam had killed.
I thought Xisiqomelir's slot was alive the entire time I was reading D1. There wasn't a single hint to suggest he was dead. The OP listed ChurchOfMercy as lynched, but there was no nightkill listed. My name was edited into the OP, so I knew the OP had been edited recently, and assumed it was up-to-date. With only one person listed as dead, the assumption would therefore be there was no kill last night.
Want to guess which part of this I find cutely scummier – the fact that you are trying to claim WIFOM Town status based on a Nightkill you didn’t replace in until after it had already happened or the fact that you are trying the “Oh, I didn’t know Xis is dead I’m Town” as something that makes any sense from someone so supposedly competent?"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
In post 1201, RadiantCowbells wrote:
no energy.
morning?
I'm legit on V/LA on top of my exhausstion with mafia ftr.
So legit V/LA that you can post all over site without posting here ..."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
My Kill vote is in very much the right place. He’s begun the discrediting portion of his defense wherein he thinks lobbing insults and invectives my way will make him seem more Town. Lol.
This is exactly why he is scum. Kill was previously voting Radiant as scum. Unvoted to sheep Ranger. Not a single mention that Radiant is Town after that. In fact calls Snarky (Radiant’s anemic push) as obv-Town.
And then addresses Radiant in the above post as Town. Because scum’s reads don’t “suck” they are mislynch attempts.
And note not a single mention of Radiant in his “readlists” at 1228 or 1238. Kill doesn’t want to actually commit to a scum or Town read on Radiant. He’s afraid of calling Radiant scum and being OMGUSed as is Radiant’s standard play. Yet he doesn’t want to commit to a clear on the slot at this stage either. He’s just going to coat-tail Ranger’s read and decouple from it when convienent.
More Kill votes!!!!! Let’s start rolling them in.
In post 1210, Ranger wrote:Not permanently. But temporarily, for a short while? (Like two weeks or so.) Yes.
So in summary you are asking me to trust you for a period of time in excess of the timeframe in which the lynch you are pushing (Snarky) will take place and just want me to take your word for it that you have good reasons?
I ask because I can’t believe you’d think anyone with a scum read on your slot would do that at all.
Tell you what – if you are indeed Town vote Killthestory with me today and once you can actually speak of the reasons on Snarky I will agree to listen with full attention and consideration. Deal?
In post 1210, Ranger wrote:The kill happened after I replaced in, yes.
I think you mean before you replaced in. I see all your discussion about Page 1 not being updated and whatnot. Don’t care about that.
You said that if you were scum you know what player you would have killed. That makes zero sense given you were not in the game at the point the decision on the kill was made.
I have already stated why I think Xi is dead. And have some theories on scum team make-up that makes sense for the Xi kill.
But enlighten me – who would your team have killed?"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
In post 1245, Nosferatu wrote:MoI are you like visually impaired?
Yes. Yes has to be the answer. Point withdrawn but f&ck that format I looked over those posts twice looking for Radiant at the start of line not the end.
In post 1244, RadiantCowbells wrote:MoI, you're seriously going to try to fight my reads?
I will lynch you if this is going to be a thing.
You have contributed jack crap about said read other than "Snarky is scum" that makes me think I should have any faith in your reads. I think you are probably Town because you play has been so sad and I can't see you wasting potential credibility on a Snarky push if you are incorrect but I'm not following you with what you are bringing to the table.
So either contribute more than the fluff you are showing or go sulk about how much you hate Mafia."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
In post 1249, OceanWind wrote:
And this is why Snarky is mafia with or without RadiantCowbells. He can't string together two sentences on his reads elsewhere despite being asked multiple times. His entire focus on the game begins and ends with RadiantCowbells simply repeating that Radiant is mafia, and he never follows up on any questions asked about his other reads.
There's nobody in the game that I'm currently reading as town though so I need to reset. I'm not sure where I'm going wrong.
Sigh ... that's funny because while Radiant has been asked multiple times for reasons why Snarky is Mafia his response is "Obv-Scum" and "I'm tired and V/LA from this thread". You could literally copy-past that first paragraph, switch the position of their names and it would not change the context at all.
Yet you clearly moved from Radiant to Snarky based more or less on the fact that Snarky has been willing to engage in thread while Radiant is just busy posting up a storm all over site and not making contributions to this game. That's what I am drawing from your vote hop and subsequent narrow focus only on Snarky."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
In post 1251, OceanWind wrote:1. Post 1213 - He tells me that killthestory caused him to change his read on Bellaphant. He tells me to go find the quote myself since he's clearly too lazy to do it.
2. Post 1216 - After I bring up the relevant post to show that there is no case, rather than admit he made a mistake or clarify what he meant, he claims that killthestory brought up a "great discussion about lynching Bellaphant." You can look at the post yourself and see that there's absolutely no reason given as to why killthestory thought Bellaphant was mafia. There's a big heading telling us that we're lynching Bellaphant followed by a list of killthestory's reads with some associatives to Bellaphant. This tells me Snowman is talking out of his ass. There was nothing there that could have possibly changed his read which makes it more likely his reads are just made up.
I don’t see this as compelling in the least, frankly. Here’s the situation – Kill posted 427 which is a big long bit of stuff saying “Let’s lynch Bella – there are tons of associative tells, here’s some other junk, blah blah blah”. So you are either left with two situations – you find that reasonable or you don’t. Ranger has claimed that Kill’s early Day 1 posting was very Town and thus reasonable and this post comes right from that timeframe. Given the difficulty I have building a wagon on Kill for whatever reasons it seems like others may share Ranger’s opinion.
Your point is that you don’t buy that Snarky can be convinced to change is read on Bella based on that post. That doesn’t sell me in the least. I feel like you are trying to split hairs by saying “Kill never gave reasons” when the reasons are the associative tells themselves – Acryon being auto-Town with a Bella scum flip. Are they good reasons? I don’t believe so for a minute given my read on Kill.
My question to you is – do you not find his post reasonable? Because if so I’m not sure why someone else putting faith in it that post as inherently scummy if you find the post reasonable.
In post 1251, OceanWind wrote:3. Additionally, his argument that "Bellaphant was a good information lynch, what information did we gain from lynching ChurchOfMercy?" is directly contradictory to his statement D1 that ChurchOfMercy was a great information lynch with lots of associatives.
See I think find this stretching. I went back and found the post in question -528. In fact Snarky in that post said specifically “ChurchofMercy is interesting, because I see a lot of associatives with them (and a lot of info to be gained from that lynch), but I don't necessarily think they're scum, so I'd like to consider.” Which is a reasonable stance given he never went for a CoM lynch and in fact has consistently gone after the Radiant slot.
In post 1251, OceanWind wrote:On RadiantCowbells: Some players prefer playing town and have trouble staying engaged when they are mafia. For those type of players, it would be alignment indicative if they posted selectively in some games. Radiant doesn't strike me as that kind of player considering how much he talks up his scumplay.
I'm not impressed by Radiant's responses to my case which basically amount to "I'm too good to make these mistakes." I'm not townreading Radiant and I'm not even discounting the possibility of bussing but those posts by Snarky put him over Radiant as my strongest suspect. I'd like to hear what you think of them.
Well then given your question to me and this – who are your strongest scum reads then? Because this whole section reads as fence-sitting on Radiant.
In post 1252, OceanWind wrote:Also, @MagnaOfIllusion - who are your next suspects after killthestory and why?
Ranger is probably my next biggest read. And ironically your start of Day post on Alone triggered that. I absolutely dislike 941. There is no reason to randomize a vote that far into the game and I think is scum trying to make an awkward transition into the game. And from there we get several non-sensical posts like 976specifically the Bella analysis. How does Alone have any basis in having meta on Bella regarding her posting habits? He joined less than a month ago. The transition to voting CoM has no substance as to why CoM is leaning more scum. The entire Day 1 posting of Alone seems to be awkwardly trying to assert reads with little to no reason supporting them – look how many times he says “This person is Town because they agree with my reads”.
Then we get the open to Day 2 in 1003. Alone mentioned Severa not once Day 1. He mentioned Snarky as a scum read (albiet a weaker read than CoM) Day 1. Snarky starts Day 2 voting for Severa basically saying “Whelp, nothing changed”. So Alone, who had a scum read on Snarky that has not reason to have disappated, joins the wagon Snarky is on Day 2.
I see someone who isn’t even close to scum-hunting and is just going with the flow of whatever is expedient at the moment. Ranger’s transition into the game doesn’t eliminate this highly suspect behavior by Alone and I’ve already discussed why I find her plan independently suspect from Alone’s.
Outside of that – I have a Town read on Imperium, a grudging Town read on Radiant and not much beyond that. Maybe Nosferatu but that’s based more on gut at this stage. I certainly can see scum floating along in the low content group of Ollie / Bella / Lowell / Acryon group. Ollie in particular has been sidelining quite effectively today – he’s just sitting on his little island going after Lowell and responding to the odd question directed his way. And lastly the way you are laser focused only on Snarky has me a little suspicious."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
Can we get some more votes this way? Seriously this is like 50 posts after he’s called Snarky obvTown at 1224. And clearly nothing has changed at all in how Snarky has been posting in that stretch. He’s just setting the stage for his telegraphed Snarky wagon jump soon.
In post 1259, Ranger wrote:Well when you put it that way...yes. I suppose I can understand the hesitance given that.
What other way did you expect your “trust me post” to be viewed?
In post 1259, Ranger wrote:If you tried selling me on, say, Nosferatu being scum, you'd stand a chance.
A chance. Not a guarantee, just a chance.
Voting Lowell or Imperium I can do without convincing being necessary. Only those two.
You're trying to push a lynch on one of my strongest townreads.
So, no.
Well, I gave you the chance to bus. Don’t complain later that I didn’t give the opportunity.
In post 1259, Ranger wrote:And you're conveniently leaving the part out where if I was scum I'd have known who my partners killed because being scum means having access to the scum PT, which any scum player with so much as HALF a brain reads FIRST.
My point is, if I was scum, I'd have access to the mafia topic.
The mafia topic would contain discussion of the kill, and every mafia topic I've ever seen has allowed the mafia to submit night actions through it.
Ergo, if I had read the mafia topic, I would know who they had killed.
I did not know Xisiqomelir had been killed.
So your options are I am scum who for some ungodly reason chose not to read the mafia topic (which I have a history of reading first upon replacing in, which I can prove by my past scum game replace-ins that have daytalk),
Or that I'm town that did not have a mafia topic to see the kill in.
Ergo, town.
See this is the level of convoluted crap that makes me very happy with my scum-read on your slot. This is ton on verbiage that rests solely on the foundation that you aren’t just lying about not knowing Xis died just to establish the post you made at 1159. Of course I really am not trying to convince you that you are scum … you would never agree. But you supposedly are the caliber of player who could certainly read the Mafia QT, look at the first post and say “Hey, I’m going to use the Mod’s flub up as a way to Town myself. Watch and laugh” to your buddies.
Of course my read on your slot is driven by how Alone so this back and forth is more an exercise on my part to dissuade other readers from swallowing your reasoning just based on “It’s Ranger”."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
MOD – I will be V/LA for weekend family sense of duty from 5pm EDT today until Monday morning.
In post 1269, OceanWind wrote:Okay, how does Snarky change his read on Bella from his "townlean" group to his "scumlean" group based on kill saying "Acryon is auto-town if Bella is mafia?" It's not that he put faith in the post or that he was more willing to lynch Bellaphant because of that post. He actually changed his read due to it.
It looks to me like he is mafia faking reads on players including a townlean on Bellaphant. When he saw killthestory make that big heading saying that we're lynching Bella, he skimmed through it, assumed it was a "case," and changed his read so he could hop on the wagon if it took off whether it was a bus or a mislynch.
It isn’t out of the question the assessment you are making. However it isn’t out of the question you are tunneling a bit and reading behaviors in the slant that supports your already formed view. I know I am guilty of that on occasion when I get a strong read.
Snarky is a weak player. That much is clear to me even after my short return to Mafiascum. Weak players tend to be influenced by more vocal players in their reads. That’s not to say that weak players can’t be scum. They absolutely can. But they can be Town as well. And I see it as not surprising in the least that a weak Town Snarky would see Kill’s post and be convinced that what he read was solid and replace his own reads with his own.
Honestly the tipping point fro me on why I am not reading Snarky as scum is this – I don’t see scum Snarky behaving as he has the last two Days. He came in and chose to make a weak push on Severa for weak reasons. Scum Snarky didn’t have to stick his neck out with Town CoM poised for lynch and doing everything in their power to make sure they got deadlined. Snarky instead zeroed in on Severa and continued to do so even after the Radiant replace in. If you say “Him moving off after Radiant replaced so that would show he’s scummy for not really believing in his read” my response is two-fold
1. He’s then in a damned if you do damned if you don’t situation.
2. Well congrats that’s exactly what Killthestory did under the guise of sheeping his hero.
All in all I don’t see what Scum Snarky has to gain with his play given he’s just cruising along. Unless this is the weakest cross-bus ever because Radiant has completely abdicated any potential Town cred he would have gained with a Snarky scum flip by basically doing nothing other than repeating “Snarky is obvscum”.
In post 1269, OceanWind wrote:I also don't understand why you are currently townreading him so I'd appreciate an explanation, especially considering you pointed out that he was posting in other games on V/LA, not engaging with this game, tunneling on Snarky, etc. What is compelling enough to outweigh all of these things and make him a townread for you?
Let’s be clear. It isn’t really a Townread per-se… at least in the same way my Snarky read is not a Townread. It is a lack of Scum-read. Which is essentially the same but different. Imperium is a Town-read of mine. I see Town motivations in Imperium’s play. I simply see a lack of realistic scum motivations in Snarky / Radiant.
But that aside – I really don’t see that Radiant as scum would push on Snarky (who is basically the lowest of low hanging fruit) in the manner he did regardless of the Snarky flip. Radiant has been downright lazy and useless. Snarky flips Town and all his “Snarky is obvscum” and nothing else means he’s pretty much dug himself a hole that is going to take copious work to climb out of. Snarky flips Scum and he really doesn’t get any Town cred at this stage – at best he’s either lucky or was weakly bussing. Neither one helps him long-term if he was scum."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
In post 1302, Killthestory wrote:stop with self meta.
I personally don't care. I evaluate you based off your actions in this game, and how they correlate with what I've personally seen or felt. Any thing else means literally nothing to me.
Tells someone else to not use self-meta. Sheeps Ranger who has basically spent significant time in this game literally marinating herself in self-meta.
Can I get some more votes here?
In post 1270, Ollie wrote:My posts don't lack content & I've made more of them than you, so I don't know what you mean by a low content poster if I'm in that group. Elaborate?
Read what I said about Lowel here 1207 & tell me why you're not voting for him?
First rule of Mafia – don’t conflagrate post count with content. Yeah you have lots of posts. But up until you get called out in a group as low-content producing you haven’t been doing anything. 1018 isn’t content. Neither is 1091. And you’ve basically been cruising along with your sole focus on Lowell. Now I see that since both Ocean and I referenced you’ve admitted you were cruising along wanting an ‘easy game’. Take that concept and throw it out. Effort is required from every Town player otherwise you are just giving scum a place to hide in. That is, of course, if you are Town.
What about 1207 is supposed to make me jump and say “Wow, that’s a grade A case”? You have two quotes from essentially the first four pages of the game from Lowell and an argument that Lowell’s ‘ally gathering’ was scummy because he didn’t follow up on it. I think the bulk of your read on Lowell is because he’s attacking you. Which is to some degree natural. That said he’s a big fat Null read for me as he’s doing nothing helpful that I can see.
If I have to choose between voting an Active Scum-read of my own and a Null read being scum-read by someone else I’ll choose my own read every time.
That said you recent posting is back to what I expected to see of you today after Day 1. And your reminder of 1010 earns you solid Townpoints. I had forgotten Alone replaced Jim which expands even further my scum read on Ranger.
In post 1279, Ranger wrote:For the issue to be delayed until I would be able to explain.
The matter of a time frame didn't cross my mind.
See but it certainly can be delayed if you chose to, perchance, pursue other scum reads which you could explain. But you aren’t. You are sitting your vote on Snarky for “reasons” and doing nothing else but defend."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
Hey Nacho.Get your butt in here. I want answers directly from the horse’s mouth re: why Radiant stealth crumbing as a secret alt is a Town thing for him to have done.
@Ollie / Imperium / Ocean– so we all seem to be seeing the Ranger slot as scum, correct? If so I suggest we consolidate. I’ll set aside my Kill push for today and after I get back from V/LA I’ll review Ollie’s case on Lowell.
VOTE: Ranger
In post 1342, Ollie wrote:That wasn't a defence, I wanted clarification on why you lumped me in with them, because I don't belong in that group. I've given as much content as the lot of them put together. It'd make sense if the game started on day 2, but my ISO of past posts is available.
Well to be fair it was mostly motivated by your drop off today. Bella and Acryon have done mostly nothing all game long. More or less the same with Lowell. Yet you were fairly strong Day 1 and were not very visible today.
As I said above I’ll review your Lowell case in full when I get back from V/LA. I’ll be frank – he’s a very lurky player by nature. Back in my first go-round on Mafiascum in 10-12 I used to tilt at him fairly often for his playstyle. He eventually got annoyed by it thus his comment at the start of the game that it was “annoying that I was Town”. Really the seed of why I haven’t bothered to really pay attention to your case is my experience with him – Lowell has always loved to buddy up to players like ABR that he likes. On a gut level I don’t see scum Lowell not working harder to keep his buddy ABR alive. The fact is he rode that wagon like I did all the way to deadline. But that gut isn’t enough to have me set aside some serious work on your end.
In post 1344, Ollie wrote:He's counter attacked me, & with totally untrue shit. There's a significant difference.
Sure that sounds reasonable. Again … my comment was purely based on that one post.
In post 1348, RadiantCowbells wrote:You're first on that list, MoI.
Lol."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
Back from V/LA –
I’ll sort through the posts in thread and gets some thoughts up. Personally in skimming via phone in my spare moments I saw a couple of things that certainly deserve prompt attention.
Also need to do my Lowell case read for Ollie that I said would happen after I got back.
Busy morning so it may be a little while before this happens."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
Ollie’s 1509 is dead on regarding Ranger’s read on Snarky.
Nosferatu I am now finding more scummy as time goes on. I was not really impressed with his excuse Day 1 about why he wasn’t providing reads and posts like 1357 where he basically drops in to make a doubtcast post make me think he possible scum just floating along letting the more active players slug it out. Frankly I can’t tell what his / her reads are from the most recent posting.
@Nos– Top three scum reads (or two if Lowell is in your top 3) with at least two lines of reasoning – GO!
And Kill still needs votes. Seriously just like yesterday he’s now moved away from YET ANOTHER wagon he was on. Snarky is now Town as of 1479. So he pushed CoM as scum until he hopped off and crap-posted to deadline yesterday. Today he started by pushing Radiant’s slot until he abandoned ship to sheep Ranger. And now Snarky is Town. And he’s moved onto another ‘push’. Want to take bets how long this lasts? I mean look through his ISO and see how many times you warblegarbles up “PLAYER X IS SCUM” only to sometime later throw out a “Nah, they are Town”.