VOTE: Sash
L-1
If you vote for Sash he will be lynched
don't do this yet
do you think this trigger happy person would be more likely town or scum?In post 18, TheASC wrote:UNVOTE: Sashasden
I don't like where this is going. I'm not a fan of how quickly this has built up so I think it's best to drop down to L-2 at least for now. All it takes is one trigger-happy hammer from the players that haven't yet posted and the day gets cut extraordinarily short.
I'm just waiting for thisIn post 60, TTTT wrote:@ZestofLife
@zeebu
if you had to choose the most likely scum player right now
who?
this specifically was solidIn post 91, zeebu wrote:mild scum lean on arith for post 54. several had already stated this (including myself) and general agreement that it probably wasnt likely to happen anyway. i dont think it needed to be said again.
they were my two (very mild) scumreads from the entrance postsIn post 90, TheASC wrote:Why specifically those two?
nothing was happeningIn post 128, teacher wrote:I referenced this above, but why not play with others while you wait? Its unlike you to just sit.In post 88, TTTT wrote:I'm just waiting for thisIn post 60, TTTT wrote:@ZestofLife
@zeebu
if you had to choose the most likely scum player right now
who?
it leapfrogged from a weak scum lean based on early postsIn post 130, teacher wrote:Vibing
Vibing
How does that one post leapfrog from scum to town while skipping the apparent entire null pile?
in order.
why do you dislike the wagonIn post 138, Sashaddin wrote:129 above was one solid post. Allow me to sheep it. I'm still not 100% comfortable with the wagon though...
VOTE: ZeebuL-1
yeah I doubt town lolhammers bc I'd just made that warning about lolhammeringIn post 139, TheASC wrote:TTTT, you understand just how unlikely it is for town to hammer yet you feel the need to specify "If you vote for Sash he will be lynched" "don't do this yet". Why? Are you doubting that people wouldn't know how the game works and would join the lynch train because they didn't know what they were doing?
I don't like you not sharing my zeebu TRIn post 153, teacher wrote:Too much of a wall to try to mobile quote, but:In post 139, TheASC wrote:snip for context
1. Stretch your mind on zeebu’s avi, and on the plural “us”/“our”. Where else could they have been used. Unlikely to be direct slips, sure. But lost in translation from other topics? Possibly.
cuz it's better than voting town
noIn post 200, ClearlyClarity wrote:That's true — no matter what alignment TTTT is, he gets towncred for opposing your lynch. Do you read him as scum or town, then?In post 184, zeebu wrote:even though tttt had been the loudest voice in my favor, i think he also stands the most to gain if i am mislynched on day 1
this post is +scumIn post 202, ClearlyClarity wrote:In post 145, Sashaddin wrote:I'm growing wary of one of the people on the wagon. It might not be 100% town. I know an all-town rarely happens anyways... but ...In post 142, TTTT wrote:why do you dislike the wagon
I might have some free time at work to check this out further, I will have a clearer head than yesterday evening.I assume those two things are related.In post 180, teacher wrote:I think Sasha and I have the same thing we are waiting on Zeebu's wagon to see. If Im right, that would go along way to answering JPD's case on Sasha for me. But I agree it cant be discussed at the moment.
Don't want to derail whatever this is, but fwiw I'm townreading both of you and I'm excited to see what answers would come from this.
why aren't you voting me?
this is actually pretty goodIn post 201, ClearlyClarity wrote:There's zeebu's wagon at L-1 less than halfway through Day 1; TTTT is scumreading Zest's slot and is the loudest dissident of the zeebu lynch; zeebu feels that TTTT's support of him feels off; JPD was pushing Sasha for Sasha's wishywashy bandwagoning. None of these votes are passive or simply there because they needed to vote someone. Each of these 1-vote spreads shows intent to pressure, which — especially in the case of zeebu flipping town — would be important for VCA after D1.
are you asking Clearly why he isn't giving intent?In post 210, teacher wrote:Why not intent a scumlean who is already run up to L-1? What do you get w the vanity?
can you explain what you mean by 1-lynch spread?In post 189, Schiavetto wrote:I'm not the biggest fan of 1-lynch spreads (ASC and ZoL know this). From town, they represent a kind of passivity, or refusal to participate in the (sometimes risky!) process of building wagons, applying pressure and developing reads. From scum, it can be a defensive tactic used to inconvenience town or dissociate oneself from a partner.
you weren't in 1923 thoIn post 229, ClearlyClarity wrote:The second and bigger reason is that I've never hammered before and I'm apprehensive about even declaring intent due to PTSD from 1923
was a townlean that strengthened bcIn post 258, teacher wrote:@TTTT, other than the timing post you called out, why are you so against him? What else is towning you there?
plz explain how this is scum indicativeIn post 129, teacher wrote:Third, Im curious about the appearance of an avatar different from the one provided from someone who didnt seem graphically inclined.
In post 267, TTTT wrote:plz explain how this is scum indicativeIn post 129, teacher wrote:Third, Im curious about the appearance of an avatar different from the one provided from someone who didnt seem graphically inclined.
that doesn't answer my questionIn post 268, teacher wrote:In post 161, teacher wrote:I don’t mind that he rejected my choice. I have questions about how he got it.
oh wait a sec...In post 268, teacher wrote:In post 161, teacher wrote:I don’t mind that he rejected my choice. I have questions about how he got it.
no it was an effort for clarificationIn post 281, teacher wrote:In other words, the repeat question is either a brain fart on an effort to appear active.