TENET - Game Over
-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
Eh? Those readslists were responses to different posts. The second one probably took me about 20 minutes, give or take. I appreciate the defense, but iso'ing without context will burn you.In post 4154, Hench Princesses wrote:Actually fuck, look at the time between 3519 to 3648. The dude was thinking about his reads in forward for 3 hours
-E
What's a normal Brian pattern?-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
Spoiler: On Sirius
First two posts from Titus. The first one is okay and seems reasonable. The second one stands out though. For a player that hasn't really read the thread, why does she choose to vote Pisskop? She doesn't mention a reason at all and I feel like she could've done way more with an introductory vote on literally any other player.In post 455, Titus wrote:VOTE: pisskop
The walls made my eyes bleed.
Do I need to read the other thread too?
Potential early distancing.
In post 487, Titus wrote:I have a townread on everyone but zmuffin so far. He's null.I already commented on the first post after she made it in that I thought it was incredibly bizarre in that I had no idea how she could've gotten townreads on everyone but zMuffin, but I just wrote it off as a Titus-post.
She was also still voting Pisskop at the time. So if she thinks Pisskop is townish, why still vote there?
The comment about zMuffin also rubbed me the wrong way because I didn't get this impression of Muffin at the time. And it's also why I didn't mind Muffin questioning the Sirius/Titus slot (and actually thought that push from him felt a little townish).
In post 781, Titus wrote:Can you guys not post as much 8-10 pages is too much.In post 791, Titus wrote:
Haven't read there thread but it's good they have wagons.In post 688, Spiffeh wrote:Am I reading right that the notsci hydra is L-1?
Wtf is going on over there
I think our half may just be a scum by vote count thread with fewer members. Either that or scum are really happy with the gamestate.In post 1103, Titus wrote:Reading the other thread because it's slower than here and using that thread to get context over here since y'all are all talking about there anyway.
I'm about 150 posts in. Already townreading Fire, scumreading Skitter, Brian Skies and HP. Slight townread on Deacon and Annie. [Note: I have a townread of Imperium but that's not because of the reading I'm doing so far but interactions here.In post 1255, Titus wrote:
I'm ok turnstiling pisskop. It's a slower thread so he may be able to play the game and get sortable.In post 1236, Annie Edison wrote:We can punt pisskop first followed by Pooky. I’m cool with that.
VOTE: turnstile pisskopIn post 1260, Titus wrote:
I totally missed your vote on me. Casting a "pressure vote" after I call you scum. I feel so pressured.In post 1240, Hench Princesses wrote:What's your goal in asking questions about a vote on a player before they respond to the vote? What's your goal in attacking the value of a pressure vote before the player responds? Did you townread sirius? Do you have a read of Titus? Given Imperium has explained that you wildly misunderstood very basic points in this conversation, why are you continuing to try to posit me as the bad guy here? If you ask bad questions and whine about good ideas, you are scumsiding. You are actively being scummy in this interaction
pedit - Yes Annie. It has fewer pages unless I am just crazy.In post 1265, Titus wrote:LOL I'm crazy. I should have read this thread. xDThis is where she introduces her thinking the other thread was
slowerthan our thread. I let it pass, not so much because I thought this was typical of Titus, just that I didn't understand why she would think this.
It's possible she was just looking to do something silly and claim 'oh this is just me doing something weird because moonlogic so I must be town.' But I don't consider this as moonlogic. To me, moonlogic in regards to Titus is her making some outlandish connection from Point A to Point Z but there's no way for someone else to make that jump. There isn't really moonlogic-type jump here, just her doing something weird for the sake of it.
It's also possible she didn't want to focus too much on this thread here because she replaced scum and didn't know how to start pushing a bunch of players she knew were town.
She also turnstiles Pisskop because 'oh the other side is slower' but quickly unvotes when she supposedly realizes it isn't the slower thread. Which makes me think she doesn't actually want to turnstile Pisskop.
In post 1314, Titus wrote:
You should be scumreading Skitter, maybe LLD.In post 1310, Hench Princesses wrote:
right? she voted to have you leave the thread before reading the threadIn post 1304, Spiffeh wrote:I am sad Titus has not been clamoring to interact with me yet given that I am her favorite person in this game
Titus who should I be scum reading right now?In post 1353, Titus wrote:LLD and Superbowl might have been theatre.In post 1381, Titus wrote:I'm looking at 778 in the other thread and I'm wondering if scum would ever be so bold as to say two of their teammates are never S v S.In post 1384, Titus wrote:I need someone to shoot down my skitter LLD superbowl theory before I get super tunnelled.
This is another weird train of thought in that I don't have a major issue with it and I personally didn't like the Suberbowl/LLD interactions (wasn't really paying attention to Skitter posts so idk), but she kept asking for someone to shoot down her theory. Sure, not wanting to get too tunneled may be a concern, but if she feels like she may be onto something, why ask for someone to break you out of a tunnel so early? It just seems like she wanted to push there but didn't want to actually follow through or become too invested.In post 1390, Titus wrote:Can you rephrase 1390 Annie?
Can you please shoot down my LLD Superbowl Skitter theory or at least comment on it?
Potential distancing here as well.
Only really votes Pisskop because confirmed IC-Tammycho requested it.In post 1497, Titus wrote:VOTE: Turnstyle pisskop
Not sure this is the best play, but I'm not sure enough to fight confirmed town.
In post 1591, Titus wrote:If LLD is scum. SS is locktown. This is moonlogic that shall not be discussed.
Another weird interaction here.In post 1592, Titus wrote:@FL, When I said, "shall not be discussed", I meant "shall not be discussed".
Except this time she directly mentions 'moonlogic' here, as if that should be an indication she's going through a town thought process. Very performative and scummy.
In post 1861, Titus wrote:@3200, I'm not locktowning FL. I happen to think he could be scum with LLD. There's no reason to have that fake melodrama as a top townread. You could disagree with my perception read sure. Top town? No way. She's only fake or defensive.In post 1910, Titus wrote:I want to be against a Pooky turnstyle for wagonomics reasons, but I think thread health needs it and that's why the wagonomics are off. Not sure.
Spiffeh, I claim a super powerful role. I claim all the powers. All of them.In post 2347, Titus wrote:Also, why is Pooky suddenly active there and nary a peep over here?
Titus went from 'I think I want to be against a Pooky turnstile but okay with it for thread health reasons' to 'I think that turnstile was largely scumdriven' when it was really driven by TammyCho. And she was part of the turnstile.In post 2400, Titus wrote:
I get that in a way. I think Pooky was scum and they went along with the ejection to stage an S v S fight. Pooky never really hunted anyone here. Pooky mentions Flavor twice in his ISO. One is a joke about how Flav Flav shot him in a prior game. In the other, he campaigns to save Noraa from Flavor who is the main bad guy.In post 2369, Imperium wrote:I most certainly am having those "too little resistance" feels and would like to nail down if I'm paranoid or not.
I do think the decision to send over Pooky rather than execute Pooky is largely scum driven. I have zero problems sending over scummy people to the other thread. I just have zero belief we're getting to no scum in here by d3, not with consensus anyway.
I do feel scum have infected the consensus but we're doing the right thing anyway. The slots we're sending over are the slots that are LHF. When we have no LHF then we'll see who is scum a bit easier. That's my theory anyway.
Also, in post 2400, she literally casts suspicion on Pooky for staging a fight with Flavor Leaf while acknowledging that Pooky already indicated he thought Flavor was potential scum for his push against Noraa.
This flip is just bizarre and I wouldn't be surprised if her sudden push against Pooky is just opportunism from her.
And then she continues to push Pooky as scum today despite setting up this bizarre FL-Pooky SvS universe.
Kind of curious about Muffin's thoughts on this, unless his various mentions of him not being sure if Titus is just being 'Titus' is referencing this.In post 3314, Titus wrote:
VOTE: zmuffinIn post 3267, Hench Princesses wrote:Read zmuff's ISO and look at his approach to Shelly. He soft-defends Shelly, slowly comes around to scum being between A50 and Shelly but really tries hard not to commit to the read too much, then reacts to the roleclaim in post 2507 in a very weird way. Completely believes it it sounds like, and acting sad about the PR loss and like the elim is inevitable (to be fair it really was). In post 2527 argues the claim has no purpose as scum, because no survival value, but ends the post speculating on it being scum anyway.
After changing to a townread, counter to what seems like the majority opinion, Muff undercuts his townread of Shelly at every mention, never getting too close to derailing the wagon.
-Scorpia
Bahhh.
At least Gyx explained what he liked about it.
This is probably just more opportunism from Titus.
Another reference to moonlogic. Performative.In post 3384, Titus wrote:
Nope. It's my moonlogic.In post 3381, Dunnstral wrote:Is SS claiming a role too?
Opens up the day with a townlean on me.In post 3084, Titus wrote:Brian Skies - town leanIn post 3447, Titus wrote:
I feel Brian is tonally town but may be scum mechanicallyIn post 3444, Spiffeh wrote:Titus what's your read on Brian?
I feel like anyone who knows what I've been talking about today should know I can't be scum mechanically. But I don't really want to be read as town that way.In post 3448, Titus wrote:Definitely not A CC and no desire to eliminate Brian atm
I was actually unsure what Titus meant by this. And the only thing I can think of is the Noraa NK because I mentioned that NachoTammy made a beautiful towncase on her on Day 1. But it's not a kill I would ever go for as scum, especially with Gyx already mentioning he thought Noraa was either scum or a role she wasn't interested in here (like, why would I ever make this kill; I go for PR's, not potential VT's).
This just feels like a comment set-up to throw suspicion my way. Even more so when she immediately backtracks on it as though that wasn't her intent.
Also note how she opens with a townread on me.
In post 3767, Brian Skies wrote:I'm actually highly appreciative of Muffin pushing Gyx for this.
I was hoping to get someone else to make a case for me, and I suppose we can just have Gyx do it.
I feel like I'm probably going to end up making one anyway (although you all may have to wait for it since I'll be busy this weekend).In post 3768, Brian Skies wrote:If you all just want to vote Titus of your own discretion, then that works too.In post 3760, Titus wrote:Been doing Xmas prep. Will catch up asap.In post 3769, Titus wrote:I haven't read this stuff in the middle, but this makes me suspect of BS scum with SS.
If SS is scum, scum want me dead prior to the merge. I'm not obvtowning enough to make that happen so BS pushes on me. Add in the fact the mechanics FoS them a bit and welll...In post 3770, Titus wrote:Muffin, SS, BS, Pooky, pisskop, skitter, LLD contains a shitload of scum btwIn post 3788, Titus wrote:
The forcing a swap mechanic seems like a get out of jail card for scum here. The fact it was used to swap rather than eliminate pooky raises eyebrows of S S.In post 3780, Dunnstral wrote:Titus, why is Brian Skies scummy?
Brian could also be provoking LLD.In post 3798, Titus wrote:
That's not a precise team. I also forgot zmuffin.In post 3796, Brian Skies wrote:In post 3770, Titus wrote:Muffin, SS, BS, Pooky, pisskop, skitter, LLD contains a shitload of scum btw
So your theory is I'm provoking my own teammate?In post 3788, Titus wrote:
The forcing a swap mechanic seems like a get out of jail card for scum here. The fact it was used to swap rather than eliminate pooky raises eyebrows of S S.In post 3780, Dunnstral wrote:Titus, why is Brian Skies scummy?
Brian could also be provoking LLD.
What?
Notice how quickly her stance on me changes the instant I express suspicion on her slot. And I didn't even have to say anything.In post 3806, Titus wrote:
Sorry that's you Scum and pooky Scum, not something smart.In post 3799, Brian Skies wrote:
What's the connection between the Pooky swap and S_S?In post 3788, Titus wrote:The fact it was used to swap rather than eliminate pooky raises eyebrows of S S.
She immediately rushes into the thread and throws suspicion my way despite having me as a townlean earlier.
And nothing she accused me of was substantiated.
She said she thought there was a connection between the Pooky turnstile and myself. When asked her what that was, she produced nothing (because I had nothing to do with Pooky's turnstile).
And me being scum for provoking LLD is silly. I don't think LLD would care and I like to provoke everyone anyway.
And now she could very well be hardbussing Pisskop. I'm not sure if it's because she thinks that's why I was suspecting her, or if she just thinks she can tie me to him, or because I've been calling Pisskop scum for a while now and was perfectly fine eliminating him if he didn't turnstile, but I think it's hilarious and am fine with Pisskop being eliminated before Pooky (which should be obvious anyway).In post 4034, Titus wrote:Spoiler: Pisskop relevant posting
That's literally all Pisskop has done. We have "eliminated" scum in the forwards thread by turnstyling and eliminating. Two turnstyles means two opportunities to save scum from the elimination. We turnstyled Pooky and pisskop. Pooky's tried and got suspicion. Pisskop's been a bowl of lurky shit. His response to a prod is a prodge. That's inexcusable. Lim him.
Looking at Pisskop's posts, there's a major hint as to his partner. It's Brian Skies. He alludes to scum having a turnstyle mechanic because he already knows they have it.
Brian's role acts like a scum get out of jail free card. It can also act to disrupt another thread.
So I am strongly at Pisskop BS and Pooky all aligned.
The house of cards rests with Pisskop being scum. Flip him before Pooky.
We'll flip BS here first if I have a say.
VOTE: Brian Skies-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
I said I thought the bear was probably scum.In post 5069, Almost50 wrote:I also recall myself thinking (and typing) that I thought it weird neither of Brian/Annie made a mention of midwaybear
Unless you thought I was referencing Pooky, which kinda makes sense because of his avatar, but I clearly said I was still townreading Pooky in that post.-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
You don't seem to have a clue who scum are anyway, so you could do worse than sheeping me.In post 4251, Spiffeh wrote:If Titus is scum here she has REALLY stepped up her game in the past year
I really doubt it though-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
Some sacrifices may need to be made.In post 4265, Dunnstral wrote:I still think Pooky should be the elim over Pisskop-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
Whispers in Spiffeh's ear:In post 4286, Spiffeh wrote:My lim pool is still the same lim pool at this moment in time
They just have different degrees of confidence
(hint: I am confident in none of them)Sheep Me-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
Okay?In post 4294, Bell wrote:This almost sounds like something Titus would say-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
In post 4298, Bell wrote:
I was responding to 4292, but I just read the whole thing and I think your case on Titus has merit.In post 4297, Brian Skies wrote:Did you read the entire thing?
Eh. I'll take whatever merit I can get. It's not like it's solely predicated on that anyway.In post 4299, Bell wrote:Just probably not the guilty conscience plus feeling threatened combination. That doesn’t make emotional sense to me.-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
Crumb?In post 2078, Bell wrote:I'm counting like 3 to 5 hench princess lies.
The easiest one is saying he's not upset which is a huge pill to swallow.
and I'm not even good at swallowing pills.
I'm an applesauce baby.
Worst nurse ever.-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
Is this supposed to be a crumb?In post 4145, Bell wrote:That’s paranoid town bell tho.
I’m never sure if i’m Being taken for a ride from high efforting what do you mean i’m Being paranoid of you but not Annie what kind of double standard is this you ask? It’s my double standard.-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
Crumb?In post 4204, Bell wrote:
That’s very even handed Brian.In post 4198, Brian Skies wrote:
Eh? Those readslists were responses to different posts. The second one probably took me about 20 minutes, give or take. I appreciate the defense, but iso'ing without context will burn you.In post 4154, Hench Princesses wrote:Actually fuck, look at the time between 3519 to 3648. The dude was thinking about his reads in forward for 3 hours
-E
What's a normal Brian pattern?-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
Why would you crumb this?In post 4357, Bell wrote:
Not really. I kinda crumbed a it’s “because it’s me that i’m Paranoid of you” thing.In post 4354, Brian Skies wrote:
Is this supposed to be a crumb?In post 4145, Bell wrote:That’s paranoid town bell tho.
I’m never sure if i’m Being taken for a ride from high efforting what do you mean i’m Being paranoid of you but not Annie what kind of double standard is this you ask? It’s my double standard.-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
This one.In post 4272, Bell wrote:I just can’t solve as scum.
Like at all.
I don’t put on a shit eating grin and laugh like i’m BM when i’m Scum this game.
Like just iso me. It’s long but there’s a lot of consistently and readily available explanation for any thought process I may have whether I say it then or later, it still gets said eventually
*i’m a LOT* more vague as scum
And also, I can barely talk to my scum partners but i’ve Evenly distributed my interactions with players for the most part, or at least haven’t avoided anyone.
Uh, just a whole lotta reasons i’m Not scum this game.-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
So I'm trying to figure out Bell's thought process as either alignment.
Town Bell: I protected TammyCho, but scum killed them, so now I'm going to crumb an Even-Night Modifier because lying about roles has always been a good idea for townies.
Scum Bell (literally the only thing I can think of): I'm going to crumb doc, kill IC TammyCho and crumb Even Night Modifier, but claim I protected TammyCho Night 1 anyway just in case I was tracked or something.-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
How so?
It looks like a crumb for an Even-Night Modifier.-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
This is surprisingly convincing.In post 4438, Hench Princesses wrote:who uses "Not" to crumb a role modifier?
this argument feels dumb-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
Yes.In post 4447, zMuffinMan wrote:wait, is some moron in the shit timeline making the case that he crumbed even night doc and then decided not to claim even night doc? lol
Your favorite person.-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
Oh how the turn tables.In post 4455, Hench Princesses wrote:okay so optimal play then is to flip both of you because then we're guaranteed to hit scum, right skitter?-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
Says the guy from the thread that eliminated Flavor Leaf Day 1 and is now trying to shift the blame onto Pooky.In post 5378, petapan wrote:they already forfeited that right after their atrocious eod1-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
Also pretty sure her role still functioned in this timeline. She just got to receive her result as well if she went to the other timeline.In post 4465, zMuffinMan wrote:most of the claims so far have claimed something in this timeline right? shellyc's role was the only one claimed for the other timeline?-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
Don't get mad when the pot gets called out for calling the kettle black.In post 5382, petapan wrote:baw we killed an erratic vt who selfhammered and probably had scum give themselves away trying to kill him
fucking blow me dude-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
I find the smiley face here unnerving.In post 4521, Bell wrote:But the Tammy kill was excellent.-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
In post 4542, zMuffinMan wrote:theoretically what happens to the purple room if one person gets voted in and then also gets voted out? would that mean the person on the other side can just freely swap over with no consequences?
starting to think that's actually optimal use of the purple room
don't ask why i started thinking this, spiffeh
I wouldn't be opposed to voting out our Purple Room candidate if there weren't any better options.In post 4544, zMuffinMan wrote:someone said people who go to the purple room can swap timelines
i wanna know what happens if only one person goes to the purple room due to the other being voted out-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
I went out of may way to make a case on Titus and all you want to talk about is what the other thread wants to do?In post 4557, Annie Edison wrote:Bell the dark timeline really wants you dead
I'm deeply disappointed right now.-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
Let's be real here.In post 4559, Hench Princesses wrote:so I thought some more and I thini skitter is scum because watcher+ic vs strongman is a shitty unfun mechanic for scum and I don't think cakezz would design a shit setup. Doc+ic vs strongman sounds way better.
also the idea that skitter is actively wrong about me + nachotammy in one game might actually just be outside her townrange
That the vis in inverted are taking her off the table pretty much confirms she's scum as well
-E
I feel like the issue isn't so much the Doc+Watcher combination. Especially since not only does the Watcher have to be town enough to convince the other side to turnstile them, but to do so in a way that doesn't let them get instantly rekt by the scumteam after doing so. If anything, it could be to reward the town with a way to get a solve in our thread for good play.
The combination I have an issue with is the Doc+BG combination (which comes online starting Day 4 and possibly earlier if the Doctor finds a way to get turnstiled to the other side), which would require the scumteam to have some sort of answer to prevent circular protections (a la strongman, roleblocker, or other appropriate counters).-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
Feels like a lost opportunity.In post 4570, zMuffinMan wrote:i wasnt suggesting do that, just wondering what would happen
seemed like an extra way to abuse the n2 confirmation mechanic if it could have been used
We'll just have to move on without it.-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
Okay.In post 4569, Dunnstral wrote:He is claiming vt in inverse thread
Even then, the issue still comes around Day 4. And for both to be true, the scumteam would need some way to deal with that (and I don't see how a scum-Strongman or -Roleblocker are unreasonable).
I also don't really have an issue with the combination of Doc + IC + Watcher that needs to get turnstiled.
Like, I just find the entire mechanics argument to be rather unconvincing.-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
I know she's been accused of trying to do it as scum before.In post 4584, Hench Princesses wrote:Brian do you think titus typically does outlandish things as scum to mirror her townplay? Wouldn't that reauire her to see her own play as outlandish, which may be a commonplace, but I'm not sure is something she internalizes?
-E
There's a reason why she has the title that she has.-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
A lot of these things are not bad in isolation. Like it it were just one thing, I wouldn't be that confident in voting her. But when looking at her overall play (as well as her reactive push to me today after I voted her), I feel like it makes a decent amount of sense that she's just scum here.In post 4586, Hench Princesses wrote:Irt to the 1300s, you don't think asking for pushback may have been looking to see who would engage her thoughts in this thread? I-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
If you think her pushes against LLD/Skitter are okay, then I want to know your opinion of her pushes being so awful in this thread.In post 4593, Hench Princesses wrote:I do think lld/skitter are/were scummy. I think it is almost impossible for skitter to be as aggressively wrong about as many things as she has been this game.
But yeah I should let titus respond to your wall.
-E-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
No.In post 4597, Hench Princesses wrote:I'm very worried this is outside her range of emotional AtE as scum. Do you see why I'd have that worry?-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
Let me rephrase that.
I understand why you'd have that worry. I think her overall play (especially this Day Phase) is concerning enough that I don't think it's a very good reason to take her off the table or assume she's outside of her scum range.
I also feel like that comment has more to do with her overall playstyle change and not so much her play here.-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
I think fire is probably town just based on some of his interactions with me. And because he's showing signs of frustration this game that just feel townish to me.
I was leaning scum on LLD early on. I still don't think her throwing out all those reads like she did was natural (but if someone knows if this is something she does as town, then it just becomes very meh to me). I didn't really like her push against Owl thinking he was new and I still think it's probably more likely she did that because we already all saw her do it as town to unwnd in Xenoblade 2 last game (except, like I said earlier, unwnd's join date at least gives the impression he's a newer player). Her fake Dayvig on Day 2 is really weird as well, and I've mostly paused on it because Gyx faked one on Day 1 and I highly doubted they were both scum because of it.