Team Mafia 2018: White Flag — Day Six
-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
hi all! i haven't played with a lot of you but i've stalked games with almost all of you in them!
VOTE: postie-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
that's posturing if i've ever seen it.
VOTE: llamarble-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
i didn't think there was any ambiguity as to what he was talking about. it seems pretty obvious to me that he's saying that you're already obvscum, and i think entering the thread like that with a forced read is a weak entrance. my vote was already on you, for one, and for two i thought a better place for pressure was on llamarble.In post 16, Postie wrote:To be clearer: why is your reaction not a) asking Llamarble what he's talking about, or b) voting me to put extra pressure on me?
i'm not really sure what your issue here is.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
i didn't believe that he really found something, hence my saying that his entrance was forced (kind of like how your questions feel).-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
he forces a read to a) pretend like he's generating useful content and b) stagnate things by ending rvs early. moreover, i think in general a forced entrance like that is just more likely to come from self-conscious scum than from town. that's not to say that i believe that he's necessarily scum or that any of those were necessarily his strategy – just that i think it's likely enough to warrant moving my vote while we're still in rvs.In post 27, Postie wrote:
Okay, and the scum motivation behind him lying about having found something is what?In post 23, northsidegal wrote:i didn't believe that he really found something, hence my saying that his entrance was forced (kind of like how your questions feel).-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
where are you going with this? yeah, he probably would explain himself eventually. i expected the explanation to be "i forced a read to get us out of rvs". none of this factored into my decision in the slightest.In post 34, Postie wrote:Did you think that no one would question him or did you think that he was banking on never having to explain himself? I'm not really following.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
so you think that i'm both tryharding and that i'm trying to coast by solely focusing on questions?In post 42, Marquis wrote:Not liking how nsg solely focuses on the postie responses and that feels solid enough to go off of.
Would also like to know whose teammates are reading this game and whose are likely to give input d1
don't you think it's a little early in the game to be saying that, especially given that like four people have posted so far?
not sure if all of my teammates will be reading this game but i know a few will and will probably share their thoughts with me.
what difference does it make between helping him out with his pressure on you and voting him to put pressure on him? there's nothing to say that following him is the "logical" thing to do rather than pressuing him. i assumed he didn't have anything because, looking over your posts myself, there really wasn't anything there that could reasonably be interpreted as a scumslip. sure,In post 44, Postie wrote:Put it this way:
If you believe Llamarble hasn't found anything and is fishing for reactions, it makes sense to help him out by voting me or pretending you know what it is or even just staying quiet and letting things play out.
If you believe Llamarable really believes they've found something obvscummy, the logical thing to do is to ask what it is, in case it actually is something that makes sense.
You did neither or these things and instead instantly assumed he couldn't have found anything and attacked him for it. In what world does that make sense? In one where you know he can't have a good reason, because you know I'm town.maybebeing the first to the thread opening could be interpreted that way, but i put more weight into awkward rvses being scum indicative than that tell anyways.
this is really forced.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
@lla – if i was scum i definitely would have lurked out the beginning of the game – activity is probably, for the most part, meaningless (so is everything else you mentioned).
you think thatIn post 48, Marquis wrote:I think you were trying to find things where they aren't, and when directly engaged with Postie regressing to a reactive scum playstyle. These are two separate things, that I'll admit I'm still not entirely sure isn't just me throwing things at the wall for the sake of a comparatively dull game, but regardless the general vibe is scummy against a really townvibing Postie.i'mthe one who was trying to find things where there wasn't anything? please point to where you think this happened.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
and? one vote on someone i think is scummy is worth more than one vote on someone i don't have a read on.In post 51, Postie wrote: Two votes instead of one creates more pressure and more focused pressure.
it's literally not a weird way to react in the slightest – after making a basically random vote, someone came in with what i thought was a scummy enough entrance to move my random vote to a low-information vote.I can understand this and along with the stuff you said earlier about believing Llamarble was giving a sort-of "token read" (if that's along the lines of what you were saying?) I cankindasee how your reaction could come from town but at the same time
it's just really fucking weird way to react and your actions make a lot more sense from scum than town to me
you're making a mountain out of a molehill. it doesn't feel like this line of questioning comes from you actually trying to figure anything out, it seems like it comes from you
Explain?In post 46, northsidegal wrote:this is really forced.feeling the needto push someone for something. you made the argument that i'm scum because i didn't sheep someone on his incredibly obvious fake reasons vote – that alone should be ridiculous enough to anyone paying attention.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
postie, what does the rest of your team think about this interaction?-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
like other people have said, llamarble is pretty experienced and apparently hard to lynch – i don't doubt that as scum he'd be willing to make a bold play / put himself out there. you also have to keep in mind that this entire conversation is within the context ofIn post 73, wgeurts wrote:
Alright, I'm not convinced this is a scum post as you are still relatively new to the site and thus, the game. Care to talk some things through with me?In post 28, northsidegal wrote: he forces a read to a) pretend like he's generating useful content and b) stagnate things by ending rvs early. moreover, i think in general a forced entrance like that is just more likely to come from self-conscious scum than from town. that's not to say that i believe that he's necessarily scum or that any of those were necessarily his strategy – just that i think it's likely enough to warrant moving my vote while we're still in rvs.
Why would Llama want to attract so much attention so early on as you've mentioned? As scum it could be a really bad play in an attempt to draw suspicion on Postie, Llamarble knows whoever he'd have to play this perfectly as to not risk it backfiring. A very dodgy move as scum unless he's intentionally trying to have people think he can't be scum for that exact reason. As town, it could be an attempt to get this moving and test reactions, or he could legitmately have a reason to suspect Postie right now. For these reasons I don't particulary lean either way on thiese actions of his, though gun to head I'd say town.my rvs vote– i was hardly making a case against him, and if i was i certainly wouldn't be using that reasoning.
well, that's where we slightly disagree. the r in rvs stands for random, yes, but it's really much better played as a "low-information" voting stage, and that's how i like to look at it. yes, town will eventually need to move out of rvs to get the actual game going, but this process should come naturally. every time i've seen people try to instantly force things out of rvs (eg self-voting just to explain how it's nai or whatever), all it ends up with is a conversation that doesn't really end up going anywhere. to move the game out of the low-information voting stage you need actual information, which i didn't think llamarble actually had.This brings me to my next point.
How is generating content stagnating the game. The RVS is named that, because it's, well, random. Random votes don't generate alignment-indicative content, anything moving away from the RVS is something that is generating content from which we can try to guess people's alignments. I don't really think your second point holds up, do you see what I mean?-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
the same thing i said to wgeurts largely applies @tsq with regards to rvs.
wasn't really meant to be self-meta, was more meant of an example of what i think scum would have done and how i don't think llamarble's tells really mean anything.In post 82, Thestatusquo wrote:
Wifom self meta ahoyhoy.In post 52, northsidegal wrote:@lla – if i was scum i definitely would have lurked out the beginning of the game – activity is probably, for the most part, meaningless (so is everything else you mentioned).
So, VOTE: Northsidegal-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
what would indicate to you that he could be right about dunnstral bussing marquis? do you have a read on dunnstral from his one post / did something about it look like bussing to you? i'm not convinced you actually have anything here.In post 85, Gamma Emerald wrote:Reads:
Llamarble somewhat misguided town, his scumread on Postie is p silly, but I feel like he's right on the money with Marqius, could also be right about Dunnstral's vote on Marquis being a bus
VOTE: Marquis
you realize that the entire middle block of what you quoted was just the playerlist as it appears in-order, right?In post 92, LicketyQuickety wrote:This shows your bias towards how you generally see these players in relation to what alignment they could be and nothing more. That said, you are all over the place and I can see where this would come from Scum trying to WIFOM Town into oblivion.
i haven't played with postie before and haven't really read any of the games she's been in in-depth, so i don't really have anything to compare her play this game to – with that being said, i think her forced line of questioning is more likely to come from scum than town, so she's a scumlean for now. marquis i think is more likely to be town as of now, although i'd like to wait a bit to see how things develop before elaborating on that.In post 93, LicketyQuickety wrote:So are these TRs or SRs of these players?-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
dunnstral did the exact same thing – did you not notice or is there something different about the two to you?In post 136, EddieFenix wrote:-cracks knuckles- So here's where I sit. I really don't like the fact that Lycanfire just walks in, drops a vote and then walks out without so much as a "hi, bye, I'm caught up," nothing. So you can insert the grandpa from the Simpsons entering and exiting the building gif here and I'll need some clarification on that vote at some point, Lycan. Marquis is going in my null section for now. I'll do a double over later tonight and get with my team on things for business going forward. ActionDan has town vibes. Marble is on my town list for now.
a) i disagree in that it's best to exit rvs as quickly as possible – if done unnaturally i think it could very likely lead to a stagnant game, as i said. it seemed to me like you were both making the point in that rvs should be exited as quickly as possible.In post 142, Thestatusquo wrote:a) your points to wgeurts were in no way responsive to my argument.
b) isn't "what I think scum would have done as a defense for why those saying that me doing the opposite is scummy" like LITERALLY the definition of wifomy self meta?
b) it wasn't a defense ofmyself– it was actually a defense of postie. llamarble wasn't pushing me as being scum for being in the thread early (to my memory), he was saying that postie's comments about being early to the thread were likely to make her scum. it really wasn't meant to be about me at all.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
calling it an "attack" is hardly accurate. the only reason i ever even ended up talking so much about it was because i got cross-examined. also, if i'm understanding you correctly and you're saying that scum forcing an rvs read would look the exact same as town doing so – if i have any faith in myself as a scumhunter and someone who can distinguish town from scum, i just have to disagree.In post 151, Thestatusquo wrote:No, my argument is and was that your attack didn't make any sense because a town player attempting to create information by making plays would look similar to "trying to force it" as scum or whatever you accused them of.
i mean, it was – i'm not sure how else you would expect me to describe it. "low-information vote" is more accurate, but i think they're largely synonymous.I then made a related comment which is that frequently I see an attempt to use rvs to divest themselves from their actions and avoid accountability, which is why I don't like your comment about how your vote is a rvs one.
you both responded to the same post (28), you made the point that town is best served by leaving rvs as soon as possible, wgeurts made the point that generating content isn't stagnating the game (even if it's forced content). when i responded to wgeurts i responded to both ideas (at least, it semed to me that i did). it doesn't seem that far-fetched to me to see the connection between the two, really.Frankly, I'm not really sure how you could have thought any of the stuff you just said about rvs was relevant to what I thought was bad about that interaction.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
i have some questions from myself and from my team:
@dan – mathdino wants to know why you're townreading quick, he thinks quick was the most likely of his team to pick scum.
@gamma – most of your reads seem to come from other players – do you have any reads of your own?
@quick – thoughts on the votes on the marquis wagon?
@marquis – who are you townreading?-
-
northsidegal Survivor
-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
@quick has creature been following / looking at this game? if so i'd like to hear at least one or two thoughts from him.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
i'm not entirely sure where he gets his meta. he wanted your thoughts on all of them individually.In post 194, LicketyQuickety wrote:That's a laugh.. I've never played with mathdino, how the hell would he know?
Like what do I think of specific votes on marquise? Which ones do you want me to look at? I was doing a meta analysis, not looking at specific instances.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
@lycan, who are your top townreads so far?
In post 272, Gamma Emerald wrote: Also some questions from the aforementioned teammate: why didn't you believe nsg's self-meta, and why did you write Marquis off as null?
i'd like to say again that i haven't done any self-meta this game, nor was the comment tsq is interpreting as self-meta an attempt to answer an attack on me – it was a defense of postie and a statement to llamarble that i didn't think his tells made any sense. the "if i were scum" was meant as a turn of phrase as to what i think scum would be more likely to do moreso than a comment relating to myself.In post 273, Thestatusquo wrote:I dont believe anyones self meta, especially when its presented in as an attempt to answer an attack on them.
i think this is a mistake, and i think you made the same mistake in your initial analysis of the wagon – just because dunnstral didn't say anything else or other people didn't make a lot of comments on their votes, that doesn't mean that there's nothing to analyze. the lack of comment is information in itself. i agree with others in that your analysis in 199 is largely superficial, but i'm not entirely sure how it relates to your alignment as of yet.In post 289, LicketyQuickety wrote:Full stop right here. There is pretty much NOTHING that says you can use to conclude that was a bus vote. It's a gut read and a stretch at that. There are reasons to Scum read you if you say stuff like this.
yeah, i doubt i would have put the comment to postie there in an effort to try to avoid conflict. (i have now done self-meta, at someone else's explicit request).In post 298, Llamarble wrote:NSG, if you were scum, how do you think that post of yours would have been different? (ended after 'entrance was forced?' or another thought to make it a more complete post? Or simply the same?)
@cogito ergo sum, who are you scumreading and why?-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
also, i'm pretty much of the opposite opinion to dan when it comes to the tsq/gamma interaction – i think gamma's suspicion on dunn is very easily explained by a confusion of the order of events when it comes to dunn's vote vs the rest of the marquis wagon whereas i think tsq's push there feels opportunistic. mathdino agrees with me here, and he thinks the same "predatory" or "gotcha fishing"-style was visible in tsq's posts to me.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
i wasn't saying that naked votes are town, i was just saying that there are always questions you can ask about something, no matter how minimal the content. it's more theory than game relevant so i'm not going to go much further into it.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
i think it's more of a sentiment of "reading dunnstral's posts, from what he's saying his vote should be on ge, not postie", which is what i was feeling with regards to that.In post 311, Tchill13 wrote:
Why GE? Postie feels like they're too worried about the wording of their post.In post 304, LicketyQuickety wrote:
Completely disagree. Your vote should be on GE, not Postie.In post 303, Dunnstral wrote:VOTE: Postie
I think she deserves votes. the way she's stepping back and referencing her teammates just feels scum driven to me
@dan, will get to a response in a second-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
will also respond to this in a second – first, though, are you still scumreading me? this question isn't as banal as it may seem, it's important.In post 312, Thestatusquo wrote:
I had included him in my list of people I was planning on pushing on before that and that is not the only reason for me voting him. dig deeper here. my issue is not that the vote can't be explained, but rather that the vote needs to be explained, because he was still pushing it as the only thing in the game that he was actively pushing on. the fact that hes still talking about a naked rvs vote when there is 10+ pages of content to dig into as his most interested in the game and most active sorting attempt is what I am scum reading, not the fact that he was wrong about it. (although that certainly doesn't help the point.) I think this is abundantly clear from my posts.In post 307, northsidegal wrote:also, i'm pretty much of the opposite opinion to dan when it comes to the tsq/gamma interaction – i think gamma's suspicion on dunn is very easily explained by a confusion of the order of events when it comes to dunn's vote vs the rest of the marquis wagon whereas i think tsq's push there feels opportunistic. mathdino agrees with me here, and he thinks the same "predatory" or "gotcha fishing"-style was visible in tsq's posts to me.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
you'll have to let me know if i'm misunderstanding your point here, but i just don't think the inconsistencies you've pointed out are strongly scum-indicative. gamma's posts have been pinging me so far as more "disorganized" than "scum". it's not a hard townread, i just don't get any scum feelings from his posting as of yet. mathdino townreads gamma for 285 – he says that that kind of twisty, kind of weird logic more often comes from town than from scum.In post 310, ActionDan wrote:
I agree that Gamma probably thought Dunn's vote on Marquis came in the middle of the wagon or at least not the first vote (although I wouldn't say that suspicion on Dunn for this is completely warranted per se), but I disagree with you and Dino that TSQ was predatory at any point.In post 307, northsidegal wrote:also, i'm pretty much of the opposite opinion to dan when it comes to the tsq/gamma interaction – i think gamma's suspicion on dunn is very easily explained by a confusion of the order of events when it comes to dunn's vote vs the rest of the marquis wagon whereas i think tsq's push there feels opportunistic. mathdino agrees with me here, and he thinks the same "predatory" or "gotcha fishing"-style was visible in tsq's posts to me.
Do you (or MathDino if he's following along) have thoughts about my 282 which is largely outside TSQ/Gamma interactions?
not really going to go into a defense of gamma here, just going to say that i understand a bit more where your push is coming from now. if you're wondering why i asked you if you're still scumreading me, it's because the way you're talking to me in this post is very different than how you were talking to me earlier in the game and also to how i've noticed you talk to people you're pushing on / scumreading – if you had said that you were still scumreading you i would have taken this post as scum without genuine reads trying to convince someone on a push.In post 312, Thestatusquo wrote:
I had included him in my list of people I was planning on pushing on before that and that is not the only reason for me voting him. dig deeper here. my issue is not that the vote can't be explained, but rather that the vote needs to be explained, because he was still pushing it as the only thing in the game that he was actively pushing on. the fact that hes still talking about a naked rvs vote when there is 10+ pages of content to dig into as his most interested in the game and most active sorting attempt is what I am scum reading, not the fact that he was wrong about it. (although that certainly doesn't help the point.) I think this is abundantly clear from my posts.In post 307, northsidegal wrote:also, i'm pretty much of the opposite opinion to dan when it comes to the tsq/gamma interaction – i think gamma's suspicion on dunn is very easily explained by a confusion of the order of events when it comes to dunn's vote vs the rest of the marquis wagon whereas i think tsq's push there feels opportunistic. mathdino agrees with me here, and he thinks the same "predatory" or "gotcha fishing"-style was visible in tsq's posts to me.
also saving this votecount to come back to look at later – it's an interesting one:
Spoiler:
VOTE: cogito ergo sum-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
llamarble, could you talk a bit about your cogito ergo sum and actiondan reads? i would personally have both of them swap sides on that list there – dan i've gotten some pretty good town feelings from and my teammates largely agree, whereas i'm not really seeing cogito ergo sum's contribution to the game as of yet.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
In post 306, northsidegal wrote:@cogito ergo sum, who are you scumreading and why?
first of all – no, it isn't, and i've already explained this. if you have something to say in response then say so. second – is there some reason you commented on this? does this relate to your read on me in any way? because all i see from this is someoneIn post 355, Gamma Emerald wrote:You mentioned you would have lurked as scum, that's self-meta friendolookingfor something to make a response to rather than someone actually having something to respond to, if that makes sense.
@gamma, do you make your posts chronologically? that is, do you type a response to a post before reading the rest of the posts in the thread after it?
looking at llamarble's reads list, the majority of his scumreads are among the lurkier / lower-content players. don't you think it's possible someone could be reading the game and be coming to the conclusion that the active players are more likely town?In post 371, Thestatusquo wrote:I am aware of that, but the votes of llamarble and LQ just feel lazy there, for lack of a better word. I just don't understand how they could read what's happened in the last day and think "huh, the best thing to do here is to vote the lurker with no explanation"
mathdino has some thoughts he would like me to share. first, he says that he's almost positive that sauce is town, having played with him. second, to sauce, he says to stop posting information instead of analysis "bs" and to start scumhunting, because he knows that you can do better than this.
for my own quick thoughts, i think eddie is probably town, for something i'll quote in a second.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
In post 306, northsidegal wrote:@cogito ergo sum, who are you scumreading and why?
responding to things on this most recent page first:
(responding to this because i expressed this same opinion that dunnstral is responding to)In post 427, Dunnstral wrote:Why? Do you think I should be voting you...? Shouldn't you know that's wrong from your point of view?
This is also in response to other people saying I should be voting Gamma, I see why he looks scummy but it isn't enough for me, I expect them to look like this as town, kind of scummy and awkward, I feel like I always use them as a scapegoat when I'm scum myself for this reason (not sure if gamma has realized this). I don't really scumread them.
i personally didn't intend it as a statement ofrecommendationthat it would be a good idea to vote gamma – i was pointing out that your words and your actions didn't line up, and that from what you posted, from your point of view it should have made more sense for you to vote gamma.
why not mention that you expect gamma to be acting this way as town in your initial post? that seems like a relevant qualifier given how scummy you called him.
could you explain your tchill townread to me? i share the view with my teammates that he's definitely on the scummier side and i'd be fine voting there as the day goes on.I think Marquis wagon didn't really have a reason to fall apart and I'm not swayed either way by any of their posting, I'd get that going again (I don't really agree with the wagon on tchill either)
In post 430, Lycanfire wrote:NSG- I feel like Llamarble's tell wasn't something concrete- but my opinion onMarquis
the entire theory behind what you're saying in 225 relies on llamarble being town, and you making that point requires a strong townread on him – i wanted to confirm that this was what you thought without explictly mentioning that. i can tell that things maybe kind of trailed off towards the bottom of that post there, but his position there and what you said about him gives me serious pause, along with the fact that cogito ergo sum is nowhere to be seen here.@NSG
Why the question of "who are my townreads?" in particular?-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
why isn't lycanfire in the running for that last spot?-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
postie, if we can't take it for granted that you're town then obviously we can't take it for granted that the opinions of your teammates are coming from a town perspective. am i misunderstanding what you're saying here?In post 446, Postie wrote:Okay then you should know that RC is pretty fucking great at town, which seems at odds with you criticising me for referencing my teammates, no?
The fact you dodged giving an opinion on RC's townplay here after I explicitly asked you for one also also has me concerned; it feels like you had suspicions about where I could be going with this and wanted to avoid getting yourself into hot water.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
huh, i was typing up a response but then it kind of clicked and i think i get what you're saying a bit more now. yes, from an outside perspective we have no reason to trust your teammates' reads in particular, but rc being good at town provides a plausible explanation as to why you might be relying on the reads of your teammates a lot.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
i mean, this is far and away the easiest game to catch up on, but that's neither here nor there.
i don't think there's a point in asking you specific questions if you haven't read the thread at all – they'd inevitably be leading questions, wouldn't they? can you just start reading the thread?-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
In post 306, northsidegal wrote:@cogito ergo sum, who are you scumreading and why?-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
could you go into more depth specifically about what makes it town from you? the same question goes out to others who expressed the same opinion because i feel like townreading that post is a mistake and it's a mistake that i definitely would have made in the past, where just because a post looks like it's contributing a lot and people add to the discussion overall, that makes it town. i'm not saying that's what you're thinking but i don't see much else of a reason to townread it, and i think that the reality of the situation is that the inconsistencies between 225 and 430 are consequential enough to say that one of the two was faked / wasn't made coming from a town perspective.In post 520, ActionDan wrote:I'm willing to call Lycan's 430 town. I understand a couple of reservations people have with it, (6 scum reads, CES not being mentioned etc.) but it looks, feels, and has meaty arguments that flow and read town.
i'm having trouble getting a solid read on quick. on an objective level i'd say he's been scummy, but i keep wondering how much of that comes from playstyle and mathdino says that he's town for sure. i also get the gut feeling that this is one of those games where town is actually on track when it comes to finding scum but ends up getting distracted by the townies who do outrageous things and end up getting lynched (you can all probably can think of a game like this), and quick feels like he might be that outrageous townie.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
@postie, if you're interested i was townreading eddie earlier on for this:
the fact that he noticed this, didn't make a post about it and then made this comment about it just instinctually doesn't feel like the kind of thing scum would even think to fake. granted, there's always the chance that it wasn't faked and eddie could still be scum – scum still notice inconsistencies or a really weird tone even if they know that someone is town (and perhaps especially if they know that it's coming from their buddy). there's also the chance that i'm underselling eddie's scumgame, which i'm unfamiliar with.In post 192, EddieFenix wrote:
I was wondering who else was going to pick up on that.In post 191, northsidegal wrote:by the way, anyone else feel like 179 is a really weird thought? it's hard to put into words – it kind of feels like a pointless thing to say / comment on, maybe.
on a reread of his iso perhaps this is too minor to justify more than a slight townlean, but i'm still not convinced on him being scum and i still think there are far more likely scum candidates.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
gamma, i don't mean any offense by this but your thoughts in 530 seem superficial.
i mean, do youIn post 530, Gamma Emerald wrote:
I like these acronyms, gives an air of keeping things brief, not getting bogged down in wordiness.In post 221, Sauce wrote: Proposal for a set of acronyms:- MTT - my teammates think
- IDCAWYTMTBYMBLTEYPWEG - I don't care about what your teammates think because you might be lying to enhance your posts with extra gravitas
- WYELT?EAIFTR..R?! - Would you, ergo, lynch this? Ergo as in 'for these reasons.. Really?!
- TYRUF? - Then Y R U Frontin'?
reallythink that these acronyms serve a functional purpose or that people were going to adopt them? i'm having trouble believing that that's a real thought that you had, and the same applies to a few other things you said there.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
obviously you gain a townread, if i'm any sort of example.In post 555, EddieFenix wrote:What do I gain from being "opportunistic"?-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
i haven't yet, although i've been meaning to – i thought marquis was a newer player until you pointed out that he was in the previous team mafia. i hope you realize that my question towards you isn't a questioning of your marquis read – i'm trying to figure out if you're actually reading the game at all, because as far as i can tell you haven't expressed any other scumreads nor any clear townreads.In post 565, Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:Northsidegal, have you compared Marquis' early posting here to his posts in Signs and Void?
any particular reason for voting the person being replaced? by the way, tchill has been active elsewhere on site but not here.In post 568, Tchill13 wrote:VOTE: wgeurts
yeah i should have took my vote off postie apologies for that.
VOTE: tchill
i'd appreciate if you would respond to 436 and 551 and, if you don't plan to, explain why they're presumably "inane".In post 572, Lycanfire wrote:Nothing concrete yet. I want Llamarble's opinion. I'm still trying to reconcile my primary scumreads (i.e. only one of you or LQ). I think Postie is more town for reasons, some questions I have to respond to, others I think are inane and I will be ignoring. I have a few thoughts, but two/all three of those jumped out at me in a way I usually see into other dimensions to find scum. Will explain everything.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
-
-
northsidegal Survivor
-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
basically a prodge, will post later today. confident in calling sauce's slot basically conftown.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
yeah, catching up now. sorry guys, i'll admit to kind of putting this game on the backburner.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
i actually seriously for real this time promise to start playing the game again. full disclosure – i didn't actually catch up the last few times i said i would or over the night phase. i am currently on page 38.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
Me and mathdino both agree that llamarble was killed to break up town cohesion, and that the post we should all be looking at is 875. To that end, he thinks that postie vs tsq is a pointless debate to have as that'll be resolved itself as the game goes on.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
someone please question me so that i have a starting off point to get back into this game – it's been so long that i don't really remember the lines of questioning that i had going (if they would even still be relevant).
i think i'm still at postie, actiondan, ranmaru definitely town, quick and gamma questionably town, cogito ergo sum and lycanfire scumreads (although my teammates disagree on lycan).-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
my thoughts on the wagon are mostly just a reflection of my preexisting reads – i think the wagon was mainly town and, if there was scum on it, it would likely be in {cogito ergo sum, lycanfire}, with the outside chance of dunnstral. to comment on something specifically, i think cogito ergo sum's reason for switching his read on the tchill slot is kind of strange – for someone who said that the wagon was little better than a random lynch, i don't think a sudden switch to thinking that it landed on scum happens the way that it seemed to for him.In post 1465, Ranmaru wrote:Here's something to consider looking into: Yesterday's wagon, those voting on it and off it, and what was happening around that time. Then look at what happened D2, and tell me your thoughts. Finally, tell me why you were putting this game on the back burner.
Also, talk to me more about CES and Lycanfire. What's your reasoning for scumreading them? Thoughts on this post: #1356
Shea, will respond to you soon, I'm home now.
i think it was llamarble who might've put forth the idea that it was an all-town wagon that scum deliberately stayed off of, organized using daychat – that doesn't really seem realistic to me. taking that to be true would also imply a kind of weird scumteam, something like {davsto, marquis, eddie} (although if i'm wrong about my reads on the wagon and it is actually town then my reads off the wagon are likely to be no better).
i couldn't really give you a single reason that i kind of ended up putting this game off – i think it started where i was actually just busy for a day or so, and then i didn't want to catch up, and as i kept putting it off the amount that i had to catch up on kept growing which made me want to catch up less, and so on. actually, now that i think about it, i think it all started with the thread lock for your replace in.
will respond in more detail about day two and about that one post you made in a second, just want to get thoughts out there. looking at that vote count that just pedited me, it implies that all three scum are bussing, which i suppose makes sense in white flag.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
oh man, i really miss when this game was slower.
Lycan scumread – my lycan scumread initially started because i got majorly pinged that his reads were fabricated. he entered the thread making a point and a vote that were entirely predicated on a hard llamarble townread, and then later on in his readslist he had llamarble as null. other people seemed to townread him for the one post where that happened, but i never saw anything there. in fact, i think it's the kind of post where i myself would be inclined to make a mistake in townreading it. nothing he's posted since then has changed that or really caused me to reconsider.
mathdino disagrees with me on this, says that lycan was unlikely to pick scum for this game and from his team.
Cogito ergo sum – this started because ces really just wasn't doing anything. he was pretty much one-note pushing marquis for a comparison to the 2015 team mafia white flag game where marquis was scum, and he was kind of obtuse in answering my questions. Granted, that doesn't make someone scum, but as i've already described the switch from thinking the tchill wagon was no better than random to scumreading screen for the replace in seems scummy to me.
i have some thoughts from kmd, gotten secondhand from math – he thinks marquis and quick are both super town and he's disappointed with the suspicion on eddie, postie and tsq. although i know that until recently he hadn't seen the flip and still thought llamarble might be scum, so not sure how modern these are.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
i'm pretty sure that my team and postie's team are on the same wavelength when it comes to ran's slot. ran, what's a50 interested in specifically? because i'd be willing to hear it out.
more specific responses incoming.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
i asked him to go a bit more in-depth just recently, still waiting on that. in contrast to my usual style (or what i like to think of my usual style), i think i'd rather hold off on voting until i'm a bit more confident in this position.In post 1531, Ranmaru wrote:Can you have them give reasons why? Also, can I see a vote from you? Or an explanation for why you aren't voting? I especially want to see KMD's thoughts, and I know he'd be the type to give good notes.
same reason as above – i feel like we're (or at least, i'm) currently in a position where i'd rather be more thoughtful in where i place my vote rather than more reactionary. i feel like i probably didn't give my tchill vote enough thought and thus i'm partially to blame for that (in addition to the inactivity), so it's something that i'm now trying to avoid.In post 1556, Lycanfire wrote: If you are town why do you hesitate in making a vote and seeing what bites?
My scumread on ces, which i am now reconsidering (from talking to teammates, new team mafia-wide info, and from feeling like i don't actually have all that good of a reason to scumread him).Lycanfire wrote:
What started?In post 1523, northsidegal wrote:Cogito ergo sum – this started because ces really just wasn't doing anything. he was pretty much one-note pushing marquis for a comparison to the 2015 team mafia white flag game where marquis was scum, and he was kind of obtuse in answering my questions. Granted, that doesn't make someone scum, but as i've already described the switch from thinking the tchill wagon was no better than random to scumreading screen for the replace in seems scummy to me.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
It's moreso about the plan than the reads, although they're both pretty applicable.In post 1557, Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:
Wouldn't #1160 be the obvious post to look at if that was your point of view?In post 1456, northsidegal wrote:Me and mathdino both agree that llamarble was killed to break up town cohesion, and that the post we should all be looking at is 875. To that end, he thinks that postie vs tsq is a pointless debate to have as that'll be resolved itself as the game goes on.
i mean, you asked eddie to put him at l-1 and then hammered him. i've seen people play that way in relation to people who they townread getting wagoned, but i still think it doesn't make much sense to do that to someone if you think they're going to flip town.
I think that's pretty significantly overstating how positive I felt about the lynch. Screen's play helped me make peace with it happening but I wasn't surprised when he flipped town.In post 1473, northsidegal wrote:i think cogito ergo sum's reason for switching his read on the tchill slot is kind of strange – for someone who said that the wagon was little better than a random lynch, i don't think a sudden switch to thinking that it landed on scum happens the way that it seemed to for him.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
In post 1575, Lycanfire wrote:CES/Dan are obvscum. Whenever I push CES some scumfuck like Dan or NSG comes out to try to discredit me. Not building consensus on that worries me about where the third is, but maybe this is a giant shitstorm of noise.
No words can better capture my feelings with regards to this than that eyeroll does, but i'll talk about it anways. Where have i once discredited you, especially in relation to a cogito ergo sum read? if you've been paying attention, up until this point i've been scumreading cogito ergo sum myself. any time i've talked about you has never been to discredit, unless you consider just stating a scumread on you (and the reasoning for it) to be discrediting, which i don't.
There's a lot of stuff that's come up recently that's made me willing to reconsider most of my reads, but this is making me pause on that.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
things mathdino wants me to say:
he was the one giving me kmd's thoughts but they were from a chat with kmd and when we were talking he had closed the chatbox and kmd was offline, so he didn't have them.
he think's cogito ergo sum's push on gamma is terrible.
he said that postie is town.
Oh yeah, and one of the more important things that we discussed that he wants me to start up in this game – so far in the tournament it appears like, as a general trend, the players who prefer scum, are good at scum, or would just in general be more likely to pick scum... are the ones who have flipped scum. To that end we both collectively agreed to move actiondan up in our preferred lynch order, and he says that quick is far less likely to be scum and we shouldn't lynch him.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
pending a further review i don't feel comfortable or confident calling it either way. my teammates say that they're fine with the lynch there – as for me it's not a lynch that i'm
against, but hopefully now that i'm back and involved in the thread i can sort things out a bit better.
@Ran– KMD said he would read up over the weekend and presumably give his thoughts then.
@Eddie– Mathdino really wants to hear mastina's reads for this game, and he says that it's important that if you're going to get lynched that you get them out there.
@Everyone– Thoughts on the "people more likely to pick scum are just scum" trend? This is actually one of the more unfamiliar games to me in terms of playerlist, so i don't really know how much all of you prefer town to scum – anyone have any information here?-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
trust me, i've noticed – relayed to my team, as well.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
ran, the concise version of my response to your 1631 is that your pool isverygood, we disagree about your mastina point, and in general you had it right when it came to the scum preferences.
i think i'm less okay with an eddie lynch today, just because i'd like to lynch elsewhere.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
think i must have missed this.
if that's meant to be pointing out some hypocrisy or something, those two posts were made at very different times and gamestates. i'm currently nulltown reading marquis, but he's still in the lynchpool.In post 1365, EddieFenix wrote: @NSGnorthsidegal wrote:i actually seriously for real this time promise to start playing the game again. full disclosure – i didn't actually catch up the last few times i said i would or over the night phase. i am currently on page 38.
Mastina asks: Thoughts on Marquis, given you stated this?In post 451, northsidegal wrote:i mean, this is far and away the easiest game to catch up on, but that's neither here nor there.
i don't think there's a point in asking you specific questions if you haven't read the thread at all – they'd inevitably be leading questions, wouldn't they? can you just start reading the thread?
i'm pretty sure that's just par for the course for sauce – he seemed like kind of a strange person, so i'm pretty sure the weird acronyms were pretty much nai for him.Also
Mastina requests you follow this to it's final destination in the brain/logic department. It was a point against Gamma, but also a point against Sauce now Ran.In post 554, northsidegal wrote:gamma, i don't mean any offense by this but your thoughts in 530 seem superficial.
i mean, do youIn post 530, Gamma Emerald wrote:
I like these acronyms, gives an air of keeping things brief, not getting bogged down in wordiness.In post 221, Sauce wrote: Proposal for a set of acronyms:- MTT - my teammates think
- IDCAWYTMTBYMBLTEYPWEG - I don't care about what your teammates think because you might be lying to enhance your posts with extra gravitas
- WYELT?EAIFTR..R?! - Would you, ergo, lynch this? Ergo as in 'for these reasons.. Really?!
- TYRUF? - Then Y R U Frontin'?
reallythink that these acronyms serve a functional purpose or that people were going to adopt them? i'm having trouble believing that that's a real thought that you had, and the same applies to a few other things you said there.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
eh, it's preflip, but i could see an actiondan / cogito ergo sum team. individually i don't have great reasons to scumread either, really, outside of dan perhaps preferring scum over town.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
i mean, i didn't really make it clear but 1746 was in response to reading through lycan's iso. i wouldn't call lycan town just for reaching that conclusion, especially when it kind of gut reminds me of a situation where scum have to unnaturally stick to their guns and make it look like they have conviction in what they're saying. for example, it seemed like a large part of lycan's scumread on dan came from him theorizing that dan and cogito ergo sum were communicating in thread, but when someone pointed out that all scum have daychat in team mafia, lycan didn't seem to respond at all, nor did it seem to affect his read.
i also can't see where the dan scumread comes from after initially placing him as town except for the associative with cogito ergo sum, and i'm not sure what to make of it when a large part of the reasoning for lycan's scumreads is associative (at least, specifically for the read on dan).