Newbie 1608: Snow Cones (Game Over)
-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
In post 10, Fraggernaut wrote:My Timezone is EST & I work night shift, so if I'm off work a lot of my posts will come early evening on through the night. If I'm working it'll most likely be afternoon or early morning when I'm going to or coming home from work.
Fraggernaut and Rosen already making excuses
Noted.
In post 11, Reubus Swagrid wrote:VOTE: Rosen
I always choose fire over grass or water. Fire is always the best
I don't really see why timezones matter but mine is UTC +8 if anyone cares
I sense a feeling of'trying-to-fit-in'here. Why post that if you don't personally care...
VOTE: Reubus Swagrid-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
Yea, I wasn't bothered about TZ's either - only that they are active.
In post 21, Reubus Swagrid wrote:This could be applied to countless instances across the site but this is a fairly weak reason in itself. Would you say that trying to fit in is more often than not a scum based motive? Hardly indicative imo
Pedit: I have never played with anyone in the thread other than MiteyMouse and our mod.
"trying to fit in" - I believe more scum-aligned indicative:conforming.
But even I'm guilty of that!
I took part in the RVS, something which I personally hate But two factors changed my opinion. 1) 2 week deadline 2) different website, different rules.-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
In post 28, Bulbazoor wrote:Btw guys. My fos now is
VOTE: Rosen
Reason is her intro seems forced to me. Idk if anyone else agrees.
I liked your post until this part: "Idk if anyone else agrees" - are you looking for approval from everyone...-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
In post 16, Fraggernaut wrote:Trying to make excuses? Far from it. Was simply stating what time zone I was in & when to expect me to post.
Noted.
VOTE: Vote Keyser
Going to flag this too - it sounds like Fraggernaut wasn't too comfortable being scum-read He even repeated my "noted" comment and ended it with a vote
I think a relaxed townie wouldn't have been so irritable - I'm glad I provoked this reaction, whether it be real or forced.-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
In post 33, enomis wrote:I think you are over-analyzing things on bulbazoor.
Are you suggesting I stop looking at bulbazoor... or stop reading into his posts too much?
Interesting.-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
At the moment... real. I think it's too late for him to say it was reaction-testing But admittedly, a better response from him the second time round.
In post 37, enomis wrote:Let's say i am a newbie scum joining in. Why would i need to lay a seed for a wagon on some random dude page 2 of the game. It totally doesn't make sense you see.
Interesting use of the phrase: ''random dude''. Your 'newbie scum' would already know who is town-aligned and who is not, so not so 'random' afterall! I'm not dropping this now-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
In post 40, enomis wrote:Why do you mean at the moment. Does him being scum/town change your view on that reaction? Why can't he be real at that post as scum.
At the moment I think he's scum, thus, I believe that reaction was real. Am I allowed to change my mind later?
In post 40, enomis wrote:7people is still some random dude.
Only "random" if he was town - it's seems like youknowBulbazoor is town then.
Were all your points on Reubus Swagridsincere, or a reaction test to put him on three votes?-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
In post 42, Rosen wrote:Keyser 14: My favorite ice cream flavor is rose, actually.
So what's the point of this question? Seems very low information out of other possible "random" questions.
It was an ice-breaker: giving someone a chance for an easy contribution, to see who was relaxed, who would attack it and to see who would ignore it completely.
In post 42, Rosen wrote:Keyser 32: Confused by the first part here. "enomis, you took the words right out of my mouth: "How do you present somebody as scum and convince everyone to follow your vote?"
If that's in reference to Reubus, please elaborate.
That was in reference to Bulbazoor: he said your intro was fake, then asked everyone whether they agreed,inviting anyone to agree.-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
In post 48, superbowl9 wrote:
I think all of his arguments are really weakand he seems like he's latching onto everything that could look scummy, in the hopes that it may look scummy to the rest of the town, too.
Not going to disagree with the part inboldYep, all of it is very weak, it's Day One. I'm looking at small details here, but once we see a flip on someone, all those small details could add up to something helpful.
Disagree with this part though:"in the hopes that it may look scummy to the rest of the town"
- I think everyone has a mind/opinion of their own, they can choose to disagree, ignore or to talk about it.
- I won't respect anyone who accepts my posts as 'fact' this early.
- Neither do I like someone pointing out the obvious fact that my observations aren't strong conclusive arguments/reads for D1
Currently I'm looking at:
- enomis' third vote on Reubus Swagrid
- Bulbazoor's "Idk if anyone else agrees" comment-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
In post 28, Bulbazoor wrote:Btw guys. My fos now is
VOTE: Rosen
Reason is her intro seems forced to me. Idk if anyone else agrees.
I'd already flagged Rosen's intro before your vote. Were you planning on me agreeing and adding a vote-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
In post 63, Fraggernaut wrote:It was sincere, it's unforunate that you read that scummy because a newbie defended themselves.Seems rather easy & convient if scum tried to push on a new guy like me still learning the game. Seems you have plenty of experience regardless of what you're tenure here implies.
Remember, my vote is not on you. Do you not like my focus? "Scum" trying "to push on a new guy" - scum meaning me and who else...? It's just me bro.
How do now know what "experience" is? Admit it, you're not a newb. You already knew what "scum" and "scumhunting" meant
In post 63, Fraggernaut wrote:Also is that vote really bothering you that much on d1?
I'm incredibly scared But something that is even scarier is someone who admits making a sincere vote for someone straight after agentle prod. Can you at least concede my point that I found your retaliation vote impetuous?-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
In post 60, Bulbazoor wrote:What do you think about super though?
Super's first vote is as random as they come. But let Super admit to that.
The timing of his unvote and re-vote is also interesting. Mr.Reubus was at L-2, when Super voted for me [thinking aloud here: did he want to spark a rival wagon?]. At this stage I don't actually think Reub is scum now, so will UNVOTE: .
There's beentwo timesSuper has withheld info (or his opinion) - opportunistic? Strange timing IMO.
1st time:
In post 47, superbowl9 wrote:UghI can't even post anything thoughtful rite now even tho I have stuff to say. I'll probably get something down when I'm in school tho, so expect something from me soon.
2nd time:
Paraphrase please. If you have something useful to say we need to hear it-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
In post 67, superbowl9 wrote:By calling out every little thing you think could be scummy, you make yourself sound like you're scum trying to find some detail which you can use to push an argument that one of us is scummy, which IMO is more likely to come from scum (since the scum know who's town and need to try to find things that people they know are town say that are scummy and are found by the rest of the town to be scummy). If you're just noting things you think might be useful for future reads or think aren't as important now but you'll be able to develop arguments around them later, couldn't you just go back in the game to where these things were being said and bring them up later?
"make yourself sound like you're scum" - that's not a good tactic is it?!
"couldn't you just go back in the game to where these things were being said and bring them up later" - I have a personal goal of being active from the start, right to the point I am lynched/NK'd. If I make 1 post every 24-48 hours, that does not help town. Better out than in as one famous ogre said. We need to hear eachother's thoughts. I've already got reactions through my questions/reads/comments.
In post 67, superbowl9 wrote:I think you're (maybe purposefully) overanalyzing bulbazoor, bulba is clearly just noobing it out so hard that it's pretty hard to get a read.
"overanalyzing bulbazoor", you spookily sound like you're parroting enomis' comments earlier.
In post 33, enomis wrote:I think you are over-analyzing things on bulbazoor
Wow, that's nearly word for word... I've looked at Bulbasaurus, have my read on him and have moved on. I'm not looking at Bulba anymore.
In post 67, superbowl9 wrote:@keyser (again) Let me just say that 57 is not exactly a work of art when it comes to "defences", as you call them, but I think that you're more interested in the manner in which he reacted, and in the process of trying to commend him for his non-aggressive defense you attack another player. Hypocritical? You tell me.
"attack another player" - tell me who I shouldn't attack.
In post 67, superbowl9 wrote:As for 60, yeah I wouldn't mind a wagon on you right now. I think it'd be good to see you under a bit of early pressure.
As for "withholding info", you don't seem to understand that people actually have lives, like, irl, and they kinda need to take care of stuff a lot of the time. Not everyone has 5 hours to sit here, monitor the thread, and wall, and some people barely have a minute to spare. You need to respect people's personal lives, and accusing people as you've done of "making excuses" or "withholding" for simply saying that they're kinda busy so you can expect a post(s) at such and such a time is kind of illogical and I dare say a bit disrespectful. As for the second thing, I've had extremely minimal experience on the site (hence why I am playing as a noob), and I've already broken the rules once; no way am I risking breaking them again. It's not that important anyways, just a little conjecture I had.
What a load of fluff. Fell asleep half way through Don't tell me you just dished out the classic"you don't seem to understand that people actually have lives"line Please keep your fluff, conjectures and rule breaks off this thread please I don't want to sift through multiple:"I have something to say, but can't"posts.
"You need to respect people's personal lives" - please respect my personal free time too. When I read this thread I don't want my free time wasted by fluff, conjectures and rule breaking.-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
@enomis: "Why does his alignment have to do with the reaction being real or fake. Why can't he be town giving that reaction?"
It was my initial stance on Fraggernaut's "alignment" - I took him as scum with his impetuous/reaction vote.
I viewed it as a real reaction not fake.
I like him as town for now - his subsequent reactions resonate sincerity.
So yes, it obviously wasn't conclusive evidence of his alignment.-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
In post 70, enomis wrote:
So him talking shit and throwing a vote on you would have been scummy? I could totally see town doing that though.
"I could totally see town doing that though" - why are you speaking from the perspective of scum...
"him talking shit" - exactly,talking shit. You know I'm town don't you
I don't care about votes really - only reactions.
In post 70, enomis wrote:
And you said "Idk if anyone else agrees" comment is scummy right? And you are using it yourself, multiple times it seems.
It was quite clear I was being sarcastic. Idk if anyone else agrees. I was waiting for someone to naively bite on that...
In post 70, enomis wrote:
Why is explaining each point clearly and calmly towny? I find it a matter of playstyle on how they play. I am curious as to why you find that alignment-indicative.
I want reactions like these. Yes, we shouldn't be naive to only look at the people who are "attacking us". If someone keeps agreeing and copying our words, that's suspicious.-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
@Rosen: "How'd Enomis take the words out of your mouth about Bulba when his post 31 was about Reubus?"
Sorry, will try to explain as clearly as possible:
Enomis said "How do you present somebody as scum and convince everyone to follow your vote?"
I viewed Bulbs' earlier post as doing this: "Reason is her intro seems forced to me. Idk if anyone else agrees."
Bulb presented a simple opinion, insinuating your intro was fake. He then invited anyone to agree - I viewed it as 'laying the foundation' for a vote on you.-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
In post 71, Rosen wrote:In post 59, Keyser Söze wrote:I like Bulbs' defence.
He could have said I was talking s##t and thrown a vote on me, but he explained each point clearly and calmly. He wasn't afraid of me flagging his post. Idk if anyone else agrees.
Zoom in. "Idk if anyone else agrees."
Is this post snark or sincere? It looks set up so you could claim it's either, so how about you clarify, Keyser? Post 65 has more snark-shielding.
Excellent understanding Rosen.
It was a "snark" fest.
I will use [] next time.
It sounds like Enomis had a problem with me "town-reading" Bulbazoorus-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
"It'd definitely be a violation of the rules if I brought it up, nor is it a very concrete argument. I retract whatever I said about it earlier." - too late, you've said it now. Don't promise something then not deliver. For future reference, don't post anything at all if it is futile/evasive/mis-repping - otherwise you waste my time looking over your mistakes and conjectures.
"Let's get this wagon moving then, people." - this is embarassing. I think you're having a poor game, mate. I might use this as my sig.
Yet more fluff and promises to not rule break. I think a modkill would put you out of your misery, but fortunately for you, I town read you - a townie having a nightmare. Thus, we need you alive.
"making relatively safe prods at others without actually voting." - you haven't been reading the thread. I've already voted, unvoted, and clearly spoken about my scum/town reads (there are only two I have no reads on). I only vote for my lead scum reads. If you want to waste our time rallying up a "wagon" and lynching a townie please continue, but I would love to hear your thoughts on other people at the same time.-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
In post 82, MiteyMouse wrote:
34 Keyser said something about a relaxed Townie not being so irritable (paraphrasing). I'm not sure anyone can be relaxed right now. And I would think the Scum are more relaxed than Town. They have more information than the rest of us do so, this stage would be easier for them. The other thing to note is that the majority of the players in here are newer so fear of being lynched will still be there. Even if they know that it gets more information. Wait, then in 54 you say you are scared...is that of votes? If so, wouldn't a relaxed Townie be less scared? See where I'm going with this?
Hi MiteyMouse, thanks for joining the party
Yes, at the start I found Fragg's response and vote very sensitive (which I originally interpreted as a nervous scum - but since then, through my interactions with him, I believe his reaction was sincere. Town-read now.
In post 82, MiteyMouse wrote:Keyser, I find it interesting that you are looking at Bulb for his ot sure if anyone agrees (paraphrasing) comment but, not at Superbowl for his "but, that's just may be me" comment. Care to explain?
Can you re-post/explain this please?-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
Yes, good point, let's bump this and wait for Bulbazoorus' response:
In post 71, Rosen wrote:In post 55, Bulbazoor wrote:
I fos rosen because of how se seems to ignore my vote on her. She i not even responding to me and the vote. If you are going to do so, please respond. To my vote Rosen. I would like some input from super and mantis also
Hold it! Rewind!
In post 28, Bulbazoor wrote:Btw guys. My fos now is
VOTE: Rosen
Reason is her intro seems forced to me. Idk if anyone else agrees.
You FOS me because my intro seems forced to you, but now it's because I didn't respond to your vote? You were essentially asking others to agree with you, but I don't see a question for me. Are you sure it doesn't seem forced to you because it put a vote on you?-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
Yes, the point I was grilling Super on. It sounded like he had something meaty to share about me, which intrigued me, but then he said if he revealed what it was it would be rule-breaking or something. So that came to a disappointing dead end.
"Oh...I forgot to add, Keyser do you have mafia experience?" - yeah, I've been playing since Xmas (probably 10 forum games so far). A few similarities/differences to the mechanics/behaviour, but still the same game.-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
In post 92, Fraggernaut wrote:My experience in Mafia is very minimum. I've played one game of video Mafia, & the terms are different.
Fraggs, evening. Would you agree with this scenario:
I realise your vote is on me right now... but imagine that I'm "town" for one moment
I believe there are only two votes on me at the moment, you and Super (two townies I trust for now).
Would you agree that your two votes on me, makes itunlikelythat both of you are the two mafia?
It's either one of you are, or none.
i.e I believe it would be foolish for the 2 mafia to wagon the same person. It would either be 1 or none.
Agree?
[Maybe something to look at later if I'm NK'd/lynched]
In post 92, Fraggernaut wrote:In post 91, Bulbazoor wrote:I coukd clear myself if I wanted to.
Bulb was that a soft?
Yes, a roleclaim was not needed this early under no pressure
MOD, where are you? - vote count please.
PRAYINGMANTIS, where are you? - please contribute.-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
"I'm not going to say anything else about this, as I've already retracted my statement." - as long as you don't delete the original post! I forgive you.
"What's the reasoning behind your read btw?" - certainly. I dont think mafia would want to engage in a heated one-on-one like we have. I think scum lies in the camp who have watched me slug it out with Fraggs, then slog it out with you. I can sense how you believe everything I have been doing is scummy, but I've been trying to get reactions from the start from everyone. I hate having null-reads on people.
""soft" reads" - definitely, it's day one. Anyone who charges in saying someone is mafia for definite should be looked at on D1. The moment I have a strong read I will announce it loudly, this will probably come later.
"I've actually been kind of tunneling you, because you post so much that i've got my hands full responding to everything you've been bringing up about me." - keep tunneling though, I'm interested to see who else jumps on. As I posted earlier, both you and Fragganator can't be the two mafia.Only one or none.
I currently put enomis in my scum-read camp, for his third vote on Reubus. Enomis hasn't done anything since, supporting his scum-read - he might as well unvote. (Reubus is currently at L-2 I believe).
"I'd also like a reads list from you (plus reasoning if it's not too much to ask)" - yes, I will do this later tonight or tomorrow. I've only interacted with 4 or 5 people. I still don't know who a few are.-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
Lots of null reads, and I'm your single scum read, that's helpful! I'd recommend looking closer at others. Otherwise, when/if you find out I'm town you'll be lost at sea, with only your 100 page-essays about me to reminiscence with, and zero reads on the actual blood-thirsty scum.
"I disagree with 96" - come on, do you honestly think the only 2 mafia would both vote for someone this early. IMO, one or none. (I don't think even newb mafia would do this).
"I can barely make sense of his posts" - I think Bulbazoorus' first language is not English - either way, I can feel his passion and emotion emanating from his posts.-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
"naive biters" - opportunistic scum, in this case, mafia.
"Seems to me you are doing a lot of pointless reaction testing and they don't even give any information."
False. Nothing is ever pointless. Whatever you post is in black and white to be analyzed later.
Current reads from one-on-one:
town-read: fragg, Super
Scum-read: enomis
I find it interesting that you voted Reubus when he was at L-2, and now you say all my work has been "pointless"... I believe you keep focusing on the players under heat and not concerned with the passengers. My earlier posts: I was wondering why you wanted me to stop over-analyzing on bulba: I think you already know his alignment, so if he flipped, you'd gain town cred.-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
In post 111, enomis wrote:@keyer:
I don't understand your post 73. I don't udnerstand the first part of your post 74 too.
Post 73 in simple summary: My understanding on Fragg changed from scum reaction to town reaction.
Post 74 in simple summary: You spoke from the perspective of scum again.-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
Mantisdreamz' two posts so far:
In post 7, Mantisdreamz wrote:good evening
Mantis is a "Semi-experienced [SE] player" so I would imagine if she was scum she wouldn't dare let these be her only two contributions so far.
I'll town-read her for this.
Too busy to contribute for the first 48 hours, but not too busy to vote for Fragganator!
VOTE: enomis-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
In post 115, Fraggernaut wrote:Only thing I saw about this post honestly, was that you invited me to agree with your opinion, which you spent quite a bit of harping Bulb for
That is true, I was asking for your agreement, but it was directed at only you (it wasn't a mass plea for approval to everyone).
In post 115, Fraggernaut wrote:Also Bulb is slowly climbing into my scum circle, for his soft but wasn't really a soft. Seemed like a really odd thing to do, & stating that you could clear yourself if you wanted to leads me to believe that you're privy to some info others aren't.
I felt it was unnecessary. But judging by his vulnerable/defensive disposition: "Well, please hit me if you want to. Spank me please" - I feel like if someone pushed him, he would roleclaim. The fact he said "I coukd clear myself if I wanted to" means only one thing in my eyes, and it would be anti-town to broadcast it.
Bulbazoor now has the dilemna of living up to thatpromisewhen the time comes - but I don't think that time should be now.-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
In post 25, Bulbazoor wrote:What a pokist. Hey guys!
OK, I now understand what he and the others were on about. They're all pokemon fans.
In post 28, Bulbazoor wrote:Btw guys. My fos now is
VOTE: Rosen
Reason is her intro seems forced to me. Idk if anyone else agrees.
Ok, so post 28 is when Bulbazoor announces his FINGEROFSUSPICION and posts his VOTE on Rosen. Reason? "her intro seems forced to me". Simple.
But here is when things get muddied:
In post 55, Bulbazoor wrote:I fos rosen because of how se seems to ignore my vote on her. She i not even responding to me and the vote. If you are going to do so, please respond. To my vote Rosen. I would like some input from super and mantis also
Obviously, Rosen now flags Bulbazoor's post 55, when he now announces his FINGEROFSUSPICION was "how [she] seems to ignore my vote on her. She [is] not even responding to me and the vote".
Therefore, Rosen is confused about the two different reasons for his SUSPICION:
1) "her intro seems forced to me"
vs
2) "how [she] seems to ignore my vote on her. She [is] not even responding to me and the vote".
Therefore, Bulbazoor has either:
- had two seperate reasons for his FOS on Rosen
- he has changed his FOS and reasons, but not acknowledged it yet
- or he is confused-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
enomis, I respect the effort you put into reacting and writing that long post. Nobody has flagged any of your posts since I voted for you which works in your favour (bulba hinted at voting for you though ). So far you've only had a history of responding to people.
E.g @super, @Rosen, @keyser, @fragg...
Please could you engage the interaction though, especially towards the people who aren't looking at you.
Mightymouse: "Question: what is everyone's mafia experience? A number of you seem to have a good grasp of the game and I'm [curious]'' - are mafia wondering which experienced players to NK?-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
I like null-read naked vote lurkers because they're a policy lynch if they don't contribute later. Mantis' plan is to glide into D2, let her It goes against my personal pro-town philosophy though, because if she's town and gets NK'D we have NOTHING to go on, for D2.
@miteyMouse, depends on the intensity of the bite.
RE: bulb's ambiguous roleclaim, it should at least buy him one day - I don't think he should be lynch material for D1. As long as he can live up to that promise later.
So far, Mantis and Bulbazoor have given me reasons to NOT lynch them for D1 [whether they were they did it intentionally OR unintentionally will decide whether it was PRO-TOWN or ANTI-TOWN].-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
...yeah, stopped looking and 'over-analysing' on Bulbazoor now. I'd be careful which of his buttons you press too.
Note to Bulbazoor: this doesn't mean I've given you a free pass amigo. It means when the time comes to honour your promise you better deliver, otherwise I'll be the one tightening the noose around your neck You unvoted Rosen to allow yourself'more time to scumhunt'. Honouring this promise is particularly important for D1, as you've already put a big target on your head for the scum
In post 107, Reubus Swagrid wrote:@Mitey & Enomis
Do you have any reads as of yet?
@GIF
Requesting replacement for Mantisdreamz
This is very pro-town of you mate:
1) Encouraging reads from other players
2) Requesting a replacement for (formerly) missing-in-action Mantis-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
In post 136, Mantisdreamz wrote:first off - i apologize to everyone for my lack of posting.. i plan on catching up fully tonight, and then giving some substantial thoughts.
the reason why i voted frag was after a skim, i thought he might have been *overly* playing the noob card. and whilst most are new to the game, it should not be used as an excuse.
the naked vote was to get reactions from him. or others even.
i know that naked votes are annoying... but when you do do them, and they happen to hit scum, it's always interesting to see what the reaction is.
Apology accepted.
I knew you'd be too experienced to let yourself be policy lynched like that
Yeah, I was guilty of going pretty hard on Fraggs at the beginning for playing the 'n00b card', but then took a step back to read through his posts as a beginner. I liked his and Super's vote on me, as it rules out 1 or both of them being the mafia. I have never seen 2 mafia jump on the same person at the same time on D1.-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
"why do you hate RVS? how many times have you played..? it seems you have played enough to realize enough that you dislike RVS"
I usually play games where the day phases last only 1-3 actual days, so not much time to analyse the votes, especially if people are away for a day or two. And even when you start looking at the random votes it's easier to miss-read people, as it's a hollow vote with hardly any meat. It seems easier for scum to hide in RVS too.-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
In post 159, enomis wrote:But keyer, i would like you to answer my questions. It would certain help me to gleam into your thought process.
I'm back. Sorry enomis, as promised. Comments inblue.
In post 128, enomis wrote:@Keyer: For the naive biter thing, did you realize my sentence was sarcastic too? Like i did not say "gg, you are scum for using i dk if i agree phrase". So you naively biting on my sarcastic comment makes you scum? And one more thing, i think if anyone bites on that stuff, i don't thing it is more likely for scum to do. Tell me then, if you are town and you didn't know keyer was sarcastic, what would you do? You would question it? This is why i concluded your reaction testing was pointless. It does not tell you anything about the person who bites on it.
When I read your post, I didn't think you were being sarcastic. I thought you were sincerely flagging me for using Bulbazoor's now iconic "idk" line. I felt you were using it against me. My "idk" parody post also provoked a reaction from Rosen: she also flagged my multiple use of "idk" too, but realised I was playing games. I felt it would be scummy to point it out as I thought it was baiting an easy bite - in the end, it make two people react differently;
Yours: "And you said "Idk if anyone else agrees" comment is scummy right? And you are using it yourself, multiple times it seems."
Rosen's: "Is this post snark or sincere? It looks set up so you could claim it's either, so how about you clarify, Keyser?"
I prefered Rosen's reaction as she gave me an option to claim it was "snark", while yours only gave me the option of it being "scummy".
I am figuring out whether you are scum trying to act like you are doing some real scum hunting or town clueless about doing reaction testing. I don't understand why you keep harping on the L2 thing. Do you think he is going too get lynched on page 2-3 of the game? To be frank, the point of my vote coupled with the weak reasons, was to build a wagon. Tell me then, what is the scum motivation for putting people at L-2 on page 2 of the game.
Just because you think I have miss-read or miss-repped you does not mean I am a "town clueless about doing reaction testing" - can't I be a townie who's incorrectly read something? (as most townies will do on D1). Judging by the flow of D1, it looks like scum have been happy to sit back and not take charge of the wagons. In the games I usually play, quick voting is dangerous because the days are shorter, so the games moves much faster - but I've realised this D1 will be drawn out (which is to our benefit), and also goes in your favour.
Can you confirm something though for me:
1) Was your original vote on Reubus a reaction test to build a wagon?
2) Were the reasons for your original vote on Reubus admittedly insincere?
3) What are your currents reasons for keeping your vote on Reubus?
Thanks.-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
In post 156, Mantisdreamz wrote:In post 147, Mantisdreamz wrote:In post 42, Rosen wrote:
Fragger 16: Why did you opt to not answer the ice cream question initially?
lol!
he must be scum then!
btw, this made my day
i'm still laughing a little that you asked him about opting out of the ice cream question
Jokes aside, this makes me want to look at Rosen closer now
'The ice cream question'is a staplemark of all elite scum hunting. Scum don't know how to handle it-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
Bulbazoor, please be consistent mate. You're making me want look at you again .
Post 160, you're stating as a fact you "just softed":
In post 160, Bulbazoor wrote:Ok, you must be really blind guys. I just softed and you still act like i never did.You dismiss the other possible events and say im scum getting attention on myself.
Then a second later in post 163, you're saying you 'potentially' softed:
In post 163, Bulbazoor wrote:I see scum jumping on me in this case.Especially after potential soft by my part.
I associateconsistencywith town.Inconsistencywith scum
In post 175, superbowl9 wrote:I think you're the second one to bring this up. I don't think it is a good observation, because there are plenty of people who just catch onto the game really quickly, kinda like me. You can be a newbie and still be a competent player.
Take this as a compliment: I don't think you or Fraggs are 'newbs'. As soon as you both admit to this, the better.
In post 177, Keyser Söze wrote:I wouldn't call Reubus the "scummiest" player so far.
Ironically, if there's anything he is guilty of is that he's playing too pro-town
Moreover, I wouldn't be comfortable with a Reubus lynch for D1. In my eyes he's been posting all the right answers and replies (anti-aggressive): do I see this 'act' as possibly scummy? (Yes!), do I seriously want to lynch someone who sounds town? (No!). That is where I am with Reubus.
I feel his posts are continuallyeveryone andappeasingeverything:neutralising
"I don't really see why timezones matter but mine is UTC +8 if anyone cares" - appease
"on the chance that these people likely care about my TZ if they cared enough about theirs to post it I'll post mine." - appease
"Hardly indicative imo" - neutralise
"Does being insincere have connotations with being scummy?" - neutralise
"His third vote on me is interesting, he votes me for weak reasons but who can blame him?" - neautralise and appease
"Bulbazoor's comment can be one of two things" - neutralise
"there isn't much actual content to focus on this early in the game especially given our circumstances" - neutralise
"Hypocrisy also has connotations with being scummy?" - neutralise
"I believe your Keyser read to be solid, but not solid enough to give me a reason to shift my vote." - appease
[If anyone has played with Reubus before, is this his usual playstyle? Or is he more agressive?]
However, his defense (#181-188) from Bulbazoor's attack, I sensed a small changing shift in his persona (then ending with a summary of his reads). Is it because he was frustrated with Bulb's posts? He felt threatened...? Or he just wanted one last push before he is replaced?-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
In post 189, Reubus Swagrid wrote:I feel as though at least once scum is lurking right now and getting away with it.
Who? Rosen. The one person you didn't mention in your read list?
-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
In post 180, Reubus Swagrid wrote:Hey all, I'm back. I probably should've V/LA for the weekend but I didn't. Will post posts later
@Mod
I have a predicament, I will be V/LA from the 28th until the 5th, would it be better if I replaced out?
In post 218, Rosen wrote:Hey guys, sorry about this but I've gotta replace out. I've got a vacation coming up and apparently that means I need to work extra the weeks preceding it. I don't feel like I can do the game justice at this rate.
@Mod, formally requesting replacement.
What is going on: someone reaches L-2, then they request to be replaced...
It is the pro-town thing to do though - it gives us 5 days to look at their replacements (including their own reads).-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
In post 221, Fraggernaut wrote:Also ill admit I'm not necessarily new. I've played some video mafia as well as Epic Mafia, but it's still a whole different ballgame & pace from forum mafia.
How do you guys encourage discussion on video mafia/Epic Mafia - are there any mini-games you play (to aid scum-hunting)?
This current game feels so stop/start - interesting to see that the "newbs" have taken control of the scum-hunting too I want MiteyMouse (SE) and enomis (IC) to contribute more. GuyInFreezer (the bloody mod) has nearly made more posts than them ...and now we're on the verge of two players being replaced too
I was actually debating last night whether to post some fake ''scum-slips'' just to wake some people up
Changed my mind when Rosen announced her retirement this morning - this intrigued me.-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
In post 223, Fraggernaut wrote:In video mafia the scum hunting & reads come more from body language & the way people answer questions or interact with others. It also comes from "formals" which is usually 3-5 minutes, then comes a vote after which also gives you a lot of info.
Wow, that is totally another game
Fraggernaut, I feel we are under-using your body-language-read talent.
Place a name under each picture. Who do you think they depict?
Person A:.............................
Person B:.............................-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
-
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
Intent to exploit Poe's Law.
In post 234, superbowl9 wrote:
224: Ew, you actually did like a game thing. You're either waaaay overzealous town or scum (I've made clear which I think). How would this take advantage of body language reading, exactly?
I love you dude. I hope we play again in the near future - this could be the beginning of a beautiful friendship.
In post 234, superbowl9 wrote:I feel there are better candidates (Reu, mantis, maybe enomis)
Two of your 3-player scum list are on my D1 lynch pool, so I would say our two different methods are working in perfect harmony.
In post 234, superbowl9 wrote:We should wait to hear from zik before anyone hammers
As I said earlier, if anyone hammers (a)beforeMaster Zik defends himself or (b)beforeposting'intent to hammer', they will be lynched D2. I don't care what alignment they are, they must learn