In post 160, Shazam wrote:Another example of seeing things as being more against him than they are. This kind of defensiveness is hard to read because it's at the very least anti-town.
Good point, I found that post very paranoid too - if he re-reads my posts he'll realise I wasn't trying to get him lynched, I was just analysing his 'logic'. The fact he voted for me too reeked of desperation too. All non-alignment indicative defensive behaviour though. I'd prefer to see him scum-hunting then being on the back-foot before I analyse him further.
In post 160, Shazam wrote:Keyser Söze wrote: In post 99, Shazam wrote:dragonspawn wrote:Anna isn't easy to read because she is still a newb. She could be scum but not willing to just assume so and I see no reason to rush anything.
I think this is a response to post 90. If I'm right, you're reading it wrong and I'm not sure what to make of that.
VOTE: dragonspawn
You were the only person to take a different angle on voting on dragonspawn's wagon. This intrigues me:
VOTE: Shazam
Ok, but if you vote every time something intrigues you, you'll be switching votes an awful lot.
I am selective with the timing of my votes.
I like your earlier point.
Do you still stand by your first reason for voting dragonspawn? Or has his defensive-reactions added to your scum-read of him?
I will keep my vote on you for now, as I have an unnerving worry about your quick reply to my vote. If you are town, I hope you understand.