Secret Alt Mafia 2 – Game over!
-
-
CellPhone Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 11
- Joined: October 11, 2015
- Location: In your pocket
-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
In post 110, Spider Gwen wrote:In other news, Qualford is town, I think I may know who Dead guy is, which makes him likely town, and Gumby is still scum.
Unvote
Vote Gumby
P-edit: Kill it with fire!
scum
In post 148, Quailford LOL wrote:In post 145, CellPhone wrote:Which specific circumstances would "allow" you to play obvtown?
"not getting caught" LOL
scum
gumby is town af and these people mistakenly think they can deride him for an easy bad lynch-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
calling 'artificial' a scum tell in a game full of secret alts, lol ok whatever you say
trying to rely on old rules = scum doesn't know how to approach this game-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
In post 32, Natural Aristocracy wrote:I think Great Value is a Great Vote.
VOTE: Great Value
That entry post and paragraph was far too strong-arming. "Look at me! I'm the guy with everyone's best interests at heart! I will make an antagonist out of this Shiba Anime-name guy!"
Eh. It gets out of RVS/RQS/PB&J, so I am down with this course of action.
knows greatvalue is town-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
In post 89, You are dead to me wrote:Lol, no. There are bad surface-level reasons to suspect Greatvalue: "stifling conversation" "not answering RQS because he's afraid he'll get caught" "overexplaining himself" etc. I'm not voting him for any of that shit, and I wish people would stop assuming.
There are mid-level reasons to read Greatvalue as town. He has a genuine-sounding tone. He talks like he believes what he's saying. People at this level are assuming I'm using level 1 reasoning to scumread him.
There are high-level reasons why Greatvalue is scummy. No one has touched on this yet. Natural Aristocracy came close but didn't nail them.
looks like playing with you is gonna be fun
on opposite day-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy
-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
In post 175, Concorde wrote:I think scum tried to wagon you, got called out for it, and are searching for easy pickings.
which scum and where? does this apply to all four of your stated scumreads? if not, why didn't you say who?
saying this is meaningless if you don't tie it to a player or players-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
In post 180, Spider Gwen wrote:Dipsy is scum taking a very surface skim approach looking for things to attack. He's not looking at intent. At all.
if i were not looking at intent i would have been saying things like "anyone who pushes gumby is scum" when in fact i said two specific people were trying to deride gumby's claim to push through a lynch, which is exactly what looking at intent looks like
Totally whitewashing the point that even though this game is full of alts, the "old ways" of scumhunting still apply and are perhaps the purest. Dimitri is not coming off as artificial because he's an alt. He's coming off artificial because he's scum having to fake everything he says and does. There's an extra barrier there, and you notice it in his posting. It doesn't feel natural.
not what you said. what you said is "his posts are artificial. which means he's scum." not "his posts are artificial in this specific scummy way". you said that all artificiality means scumminess
if you'd given this quoted explanation at the time i'd have believed you but you stripped out all the nuance
it's about as likely you failed to communicate that thought properly than you came up with the above afterwards though so i don't really care about this anymore. it's still really lame as a read though but lame reads are p null
Also lol on the thought that everybody pushing Gumby must be scum. It's never that simple, and rarely true. That looks very much like a white knight of Gumby, which is the only thing that really puts a dent in my scum read there.
my calling out the two people voting for gumby is not the same thing as "everybody pushing gumby must be scum", which is why i didn't say the latter
what it looks like when i make a general statement along lines of "everybody doing x thing = alignment telling" - contrast to how i addressed individual posts re: gumby rather than make general statement "people voting gumby are scum"
that's how you know that there could have been people voting gumby in ways i found less scummy. there just weren't
maybe consider my intent next time lol-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
In post 187, Natural Aristocracy wrote:Gwen:That's fair. I am interested in you going a bit more in-depth with where Dipsy is only going with surface reactions rather than intent. I can see where you're coming from in his ISO, but I'd like you to be a bit more specific rather than making a sweeping statement. Of course, I want to see how Dipsy responds, too. Not enough that I'd lend my vote in that direction, though.
could you be on the fence any harder
UNVOTE: gwen
VOTE: aristocracy-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
In post 190, Spider Gwen wrote:@Aristocrat: If Dipsy was actually trying to figure out intent, he would have asked me about the artificial statement, not sweep it aside with "alt" and telling me the "old ways" of scumhunting didn't apply.
if i were still trying to figure it out, maybe
not when i already decided i'd figured it out
if i already think i know what your intent was i don't gain anything from asking you what your intent was because you can't objectively review my conclusion
In my case, it had absolutely nothing to do with his miller claim (even though I have my doubts).
you voted right after a miller claim that was transparently protown and made no comment on what seems like a pretty important thing about your scumread's behaviour
seems like a pretty impressive mental feat to divorce something as big as a claim from your read-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
In post 237, Natural Aristocracy wrote:Dipsy:So... asking for someone to speak more on their read and be specific while saying that my added vote to pressure a response on you seems unnecessary/not in my interests is fence-sitting?
You're a let down.
'i think your read has good points but i want to hear more from you'
'i'm interested and dipsy has to say more but i'm not ready to vote for him'
you really couldn't be playing both sides of that harder-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
In post 238, Natural Aristocracy wrote:I'd be willing to vote for you. Not going to now for a few ~reasons~, but know that you're on the list.
oh no-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
In post 216, the_soothsayer wrote:Dipsys town read on Gumpy is something I agree entirely with him, that said I don't agree with him saying that people pushing Gumpy alone is a scum tell. I do want him to explain his megafan comment
megafan is deliberately using v bad spelling and grammar which is going to endear him to other players about as much as genital warts
town's going to get fed up with not being taken seriously and tone it down before long
scum keeps it going to hide behind
i was tempted to just not say this and wait to see if he kept doing it but i decided i liked it more as an incentive for megafan to just stop already before making it a thing
as well as why his vote went to Gwen over NA.
miller claim feels like biggest thing to have happened today, decided to prioritise a vote which dealt with handling of that
aristocracy is scummiest now though-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
In post 243, Natural Aristocracy wrote:I agreed with the read but wanted to see more of Gwen's process.
I wanted to see your response but felt my vote was unnecessary in seeing your response.
I do not see how this is fence-sitting. There are no 'maybes' in that situation.
I did agree with Gwen's read on you. Hearing more on the read was not going to change my mind about that.
I did want to hear your response to that read/those points. Voting you was not something I was going to do in order to rile you into response.
You're picking up what I wrote and misappropriating it as "I am not sold on your read. I want to vote Dipsy but will wait until he responds" which is fence-sitty. That is not what I posted, though.
I don't know if you're doing this because you couldn't make heads or tails of what may be an unclear situation or if you're pushing this narrative to excuse voting for an easy wagon to push.
Regardless, try again.
semantics
'yeah good job but i'm not ready to commit' is scum language-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
In post 217, Natural Aristocracy wrote:I'm glad the people scum-reading me can't articulate much more than "Oh he is confident there is scum in two people!" and "Seems slimy!"
There's not much I can address there.
In short, give me something to work with.
this is how scum reacts to wagons - 'stop saying why i'm scum if you can't let me argue against it it's not fair'-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
In post 248, Shiba Tatsuya wrote:That's not necessarily true.
nothing is 100%, it's all degrees of which alignment is more likely to do what
scum does that more than town-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
In post 232, Shiba Tatsuya wrote:Ironically, Yadtm identifying as female narrows down her alt possibilities, because they're a minority group. And my previous theory still holds true.
is this real life-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
In post 251, Natural Aristocracy wrote:You keep substituting my actual words for shit you're coming up with.
Your 247 rubs me all kinds of wrong, especially because
A) That's bullshit. Town can be frustrated at that, too.
sure but town does some thing proactive about it like evaluating whether or not individual people doing it to you are scum. you're just whining, which makes me think it's just for show
I'm frustrated with you.
i'm not trying to be a dick but i don't care? either alignment would feel frustrated
I never said "I am not ready to commit" in terms of holding onto my vote, which is what you are implying and flat-out saying elsewhere. I was never going to lay a vote on you, even though I agreed with Gwen's assessment of your slot. Stop insisting on this.
yes i am paraphrasing you because that's what i see when i read the words you wrote
like i know what you said, and words to that extent are things that i see from scum more than i do town-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
In post 251, Natural Aristocracy wrote:Basically, you're wrong, annoyingly convinced you are right, willing to disregard what I post to enable you being wrong, and you're acting like a smug sack of conf-biased shit about it.
this part does give me some pause because feeling entitled to be right and accepted for being right is more likely to come from town than scum
on balance though there's more scummy than town and this could be a well judged extension of the whiny stuff you've said elsewhere-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
In post 252, Natural Aristocracy wrote:Total aside;
Should we reveal our main in twilight post-flip?
Or should we save that for post-game?
haven't decided if i'll reveal my main at all, tempted to keep this for other games-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
In post 267, Shiba Tatsuya wrote:I think that the best way to handle situations like this is for a rolecop on him, to determine if he is telling the truth.
oh sure i'll get right on that
do you see town rolecops so often that you just assume we have one
what a weird way to sum up a read-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
In post 279, Shiba Tatsuya wrote:
And, I believe this is the sum up of the read, and not the sentence that you've posted.
I've made a mistake in typing 'was' -> 'wasn't'.
in terms of what you want to do with gumby re: do we or do we not lynch him, 'idk rolecop him' was a better summary-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
In post 284, Shiba Tatsuya wrote:Would you like to vote Quailford with me?
yeah we can see where that goes
VOTE: quailford
don't see aristocracy wagon growing much any time soon sadface-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
In post 283, Shiba Tatsuya wrote:Do you have any more comments on the rest of my reads?
don't feel like you pushed the boat out very far, rolecop thing stood out most
i liked the dividers
What do you think about Quailford and my comparison of him with you?
still don't like his treatment of gumby
idrc about your comparison, i'd like the intent thing more if i hadn't already pointed out exactly where you can see my intent, but if it works for you knock yourself out-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
In post 285, Natural Aristocracy wrote:Dipsy: I don't think that Shiba was trying to direct a rolecop as much as he was suggesting that roles will be able to sort out the miller claim as well as anything else. You've got a case of reading things without considering different context, I guess?
even i can see more room for interpretation in your thing than shiba's rolecop thing. it's not that he _directed_ a rolecop it's that he matter of factly said that we could basically leave it to a rolecop which is an incredibly specific role and more often one given to scum rather than town. like no other role 'sorts out' the miller claim with same clarity a rolecop would so you're giving him too much credit for meaning it in general
i do consider different context, that's like the whole game, but he wrote the sentence that he wrote-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
In post 296, Shiba Tatsuya wrote:Do you still have concerns with Spider Gwen?
don't think the artificial thing is a big deal anymore
still think some weird mental gymnastics being done re: her gumby read
volume of posts is protown indicator though
lean town-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
In post 302, Concorde wrote:236 244 I am not liking Dipsy's vote here onto NA, given the criticism brought before that he didn't just vote NA at 155. Instead he just votes NA. The response to this criticism comes in 244 rather than 236. If Dipsy's catching up in order, he should have replied to the criticism of why Gwen over NA before moving his vote.
i voted aristocracy after reading 187
the question about why i voted gwen over aristocracy was in 216
so what are you trying to say
if your assumption is that i wouldn't vote before finished catching up then it is faulty-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
you know my catchup continued even beyond the part where i addressed the q about why i voted gwen
like it's all in a line, minus the posts that were happening in real time, so if it were all a cover up for realising i forgot to explain something you also have to think i quickly found more things to say about other posts. one of them (250) was even an observation that resonated with you
you have to make a lot of leaps to think i'm some kind of forgetful/malicious idiot mastermind when the obvious truth is that i was just reading along
your theory does not fit the evidence-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
In post 308, Concorde wrote:Spider Gwen is an early vote without a reason.
you mean apart from the reasons
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 5#p7301495
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 9#p7301499
I don't know why you voted Gwen over NA. That's the whole problem. Your response didn't clear that up. So why don't you tell me why you voted Gwen over NA?
reasons (above) plus priority (explained) equals vote
What do you think of ST?
dunno. i don't think he's done much that interesting-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
In post 311, Concorde wrote:I still don't see a reason for a Gwen vote. People disagree on theory all the time. I don't see how a Gwen vote helps resolve the miller situation.
gwen posted 'kill it with fire' as the only reaction to the miller claim, which i described in the post i linked as looking like scum deriding a claim in hopes of easy lynch. that's a reason. you can think it's a bad reason but you can't say it's not a reason
it helps 'resolve' the miller situation (your words, not mine) in that i thought the miller claim was transparently protown and wanted to wagon someone whom i thought was trying to profit off it
this isn't rocket science
You think ST hasn't done anything interesting? ST has the most posts in the game. You should be able to find something interesting.
i flagged up the rolecop thing just like you later did, but the explanation is fine. the strengths of others townreads on him is a bit interesting or might be later, but no i think his posts are pretty dull relative to their word count. interested in other people atm-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
In post 319, Megafan1998 wrote:ill try not to suck as much with spelling k?
i p much obliged myself to townread you for backing down so here you go
kinda hollow but the principle mostly stands-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
In post 333, Quailford LOL wrote:The orange/bolded above is superscummy. Did you even read it bedore calling it "crap?" LOL I'd wager that you didn't.
Why don't you read it again and pay attention this time.
thinks gumby is scum
invites gumby to reread thing gumby said to 'pay attention' to how it was scummy
you know that thing i said earlier about it being pointless to engage someone you scumread to change your mind on something they did you think is scummy
see how quailford is doing that anyway
this is scum looking busy by having an argument that could not actually be useful as town and try to incriminate what he has identified as a vulnerable player-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
In post 334, Quailford LOL wrote:In post 307, Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy wrote:it's possible. it's possible i might burst into flames right now
is it more likely?
if i were looking for popular wagons why did i originally go for spider gwen
Are you always on the defensive like this?
read my iso and find out instead of posturing
or pay attention to the fact that concorde is sticking to an implausible story, which is why i pressed it-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
In post 341, Quailford LOL wrote:In post 335, Gumby wrote:What's superscummy? Originally trying to go for the "play well enough that you don't get inspected and thus Miller never plays a part" before realising that, frankly, I was basically going to be inspected because I'm crap so claiming was a good idea?
"play well enough that you don't get inspected and thus Miller never plays a part"::::: Because no matter how well you play, everyone gets wagoned to some extent eventually. So he would claim what, vanilla? And when people play consciously or cautiously, they often trigger suspicion anyway. Then, guess what? They move up the list to being investigated. So chances are he'd claim miller AFTER being investigated, LOL. That's the whole reason why, if you're a miller, it better be in your first post.
Here is what I think happened.
Gumby & scumteam discussed the fakeclaim in the scum PT. By the time they decided to get on with the plan, Gumby had already made a few posts.
hey wise guy for this to make sense they would have planned it in that surprisingly lengthy confirmation phase and not have strung it out for a bunch of posts before making the play
you haven't thought about this at all
hey everyone it's because he's scum and gumby is town-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
In post 384, Spider Gwen wrote:Riiight. I don't believe that, because just a standard readthrough would have told you why we were both voting Gumby. Saying you were looking at intent is BS.
i know why you described gumby as scummy. you thought he voted shiba when he should have voted dead. i thought it was pretty uninteresting as a reason and the claim should definitely have got you thinking more than it did because something like that is a much bigger deal for figuring out someone's alignment than one or two posts that you could easily have been misinterpreting.
claims are a huge part of how someone plays. it is easy to be wrong about deciphering intent behind how someone uses their vote. this is basic mafia stuff. your only response as the claim came out was 'kill it with fire' and that definitely wasn't appropriate consideration
I think you knew full well what I meant. Heck, you talked about the "old ways" of scumhunting, which means you knew in what manner I meant it.
And even if you didn't, as town you'd not assume I'm only looking at alt-esque things, and you'd ask me. This was just you jumping on something because it would look good and townish for you to jump on it.
take responsibility for the words you wrote. the fact that you wrote a blanket statement made it look like you were not considering the nuance of a secret alt game. you phrased it in the simplest way possible.
as town i'd do whatever the fuck i like, including not asking you about something that looked cut and dried based on the wording
In post 235, Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy wrote:my calling out the two people voting for gumby is not the same thing as "everybody pushing gumby must be scum", which is why i didn't say the latter
Yes. You just called everybody scum that was pushing Gumby as scum. Totally not the same thing.
yes you idiot the difference is subtle but important
In post 235, Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy wrote:
what it looks like when i make a general statement along lines of "everybody doing x thing = alignment telling" - contrast to how i addressed individual posts re: gumby rather than make general statement "people voting gumby are scum"
I don't see how this has any bearing whatsoever in generalized statements. That was you pointing out a policy thing, which didn't need pointing out and was just fluff. Not the same thing. This is a BS point.
"everyone voting for gumby is scum" is a policy thing, stop being dense. general, policy, functionally the same. but i didn't do that. i pointed out specific posts and said why i thought those posts were indicative of scum-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
In post 400, Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy wrote:also it's p suspicious that phantom hasn't even showed up. given the nature of the game think it's either a v/la we should have been told about or someone who really didn't want a scum pm in this game but got one
like i imagine we were all p excited to sign up for this and the most reliable way i know for some people to have that excitement drain away is to draw scum-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
In post 404, Quilford wrote:The Phantom of the Opera should be up for a prod around now, but they've been having trouble logging onto their account (hopefully resolved) so I'm going to give them a bit more time.
ok disregard the scum thing then-
-
CellPhone Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 11
- Joined: October 11, 2015
- Location: In your pocket
In post 155, Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy wrote:In post 110, Spider Gwen wrote:In other news, Qualford is town, I think I may know who Dead guy is, which makes him likely town, and Gumby is still scum.
Unvote
Vote Gumby
P-edit: Kill it with fire!
scum
In post 148, Quailford LOL wrote:In post 145, CellPhone wrote:Which specific circumstances would "allow" you to play obvtown?
"not getting caught" LOL
scum
gumby is town af and these people mistakenly think they can deride him for an easy bad lynch
Only scum can come up with such easy scumreads. The two above are probtown.-
-
CellPhone Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 11
- Joined: October 11, 2015
- Location: In your pocket
In post 411, the_soothsayer wrote:hoping that it's just the start of his catching up.
It is. Much, much more to come.-
-
CellPhone Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 11
- Joined: October 11, 2015
- Location: In your pocket
In post 241, Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy wrote:In post 238, Natural Aristocracy wrote:I'd be willing to vote for you. Not going to now for a few ~reasons~, but know that you're on the list.
oh no
Well.... I am now reconsidering my thoughts on Dipsy Doodle. This is a solid town reaction to the threat of a vote.-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
In post 420, Spider Gwen wrote:The timing of the claim was incredibly scummy. He starts getting suspected by several players and then throws up his hands and cries Miller. I wanted that dead. And let's not even get into his statement about his ability to obv. town if he needs to and how that contradicts what just happened with his miller claim.
that's not any different to how a town player behaves if they draw miller and think at the start of the game that they would be best off not mentioning it. knowing that the claim itself invites suspicion only makes it more likely that it will come out incredibly quickly under suspicion because you essentially take on the scum persona of having something to hide, so you feel it much more keenly when people suspect you and it snowballs. the timing of the claim seems null. way it was handled reads town
and since when does someone thinking they can be obvtown have anything to do with how obvtown they actually are. 95% of people on this site, myself included, think they're better than they are
In post 399, Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy wrote:
take responsibility for the words you wrote. the fact that you wrote a blanket statement made it look like you were not considering the nuance of a secret alt game. you phrased it in the simplest way possible.
Screw you. You knew what I meant when I wrote that, otherwise you wouldn't be talking about the old ways of doing things, which focuses on whether a post is genuine or not. Don't try to weasel out of this by shifting the blame onto me.
you're always going to assume that you communicated your thought in the way you intended. but you didn't. there's nothing else to say to this that isn't exactly what i've already said so i'm done
In post 399, Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy wrote:
"everyone voting for gumby is scum" is a policy thing, stop being dense. general, policy, functionally the same. but i didn't do that. i pointed out specific posts and said why i thought those posts were indicative of scum
Bull crap. You only pushed those who were pushing Gumby as scum. And no, you didn't give reasons. You just pointed at our posts and said scum and then followed that up with some BS about scum trying to push the miller claim. Town would have stepped back and looked at that wagon and what happened. Only 2 people on the wagon likely meant scum was not messing with Gumby's claim if he was town. At most you had 1 scum on there, meaning your job should have been to figure out which vote was the scum one. You didn't do that. You just made a blanket statement of "everybody on this wagon (which was everyone pushing him) is scum". Stop trying to evade responsibility with this semantics BS.
playing to expected values of scum presence in x wagon is dumb. i read individual posts and looked for scum behaviour in them. you're demanding a thought process from me that if you were honest with yourself i don't think you'd be able to say that more than a generous 10% of town players actually use, regardless of merit
again i'm only going to go in circles here and i lean town on you so i have no interest in going round again. it would be nice if there were someone else scumreading gumby in a better way somehow so that you/quailford could stand in contrast but your refusal to engage with the notion that just because i objected to the only two gumby scumreads doesn't mean i would have objected to every one were there more is irritating
the sample size is two ffs-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
In post 409, Natural Aristocracy wrote:Well, I guess I can mark Spider Gwen down as yet another player who thinks I'm 'fencesitting' because I can say more than one thing about something.
I don't like the Quailford wagon--the reasons why people are on it make sense from their PoV, but I don't like its composition and I'm not crazy about Quailford as scum on top of that.
It seems weird that Dimitri, Dipsy, and Shiba are all there given how much they've had differing thoughts earlier on. Gumby is probably the only one I wouldn't fault for being on that wagon, as Quailford has been lingering with a Gumby vote for awhile. I don't trust Dipsy's judgment at all and I think Dimitri has been swinging for the fences with really easy votes without putting in much else.
I don't think Quailford's posting has been amazing, to be honest. There's a sort of carefree and hands-off approach going on that's contrary to how a lot of us are tackling this game, so I can't really make heads or tails of it. Ultimately, I feel like there are far better candidates for lynching today and while Quailford isn't some shining bastion of town, dude isn't the scummiest by a longshot.
I should probably be supporting this wagon, because I think Soothsayer's comments on Quailford are pretty spot-on and because I'm likely going to be lynched if it doesn't go through, but, hey, fuck it, sticking to my guns here.
obv this is dreadful but you guys got that already-
-
CellPhone Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 11
- Joined: October 11, 2015
- Location: In your pocket
-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
In post 427, Concorde wrote:Gwen, I think there's some fundamental misunderstanding going on in your posts. 420 is townie but also as high as its name regarding Dipsy. I could give you some line about me knowing everything about Dipsy forty two times over, but that's not going to actually going to help you see that. So onto substance now.
Dipsy is right that scum can push a wagon without voting it. The not subtle attack on Gumby by ST is exactly that. If ST was town reading Gumby, he too would view the rolecop on him as a waste. Scum are going to suggest imply and try to divide town but hope town bites first and sheep it.
Not everyone follows the miller claim post one rule. That assumption is built into your post. Have you ever considered that his miller claim was the ace in the hole to obvtown himself?
Explain to me the contradictions in NA's post as if I am as dumb as Shady wants me to be. I don't see them at all and I'm confident you won't either after breaking it down into its component parts.
Now, the riling up comment. Having us two fight isn't worthless, mostly because ST is scum and the best retaliation they can muster is I am dumb for catching ST falling all over himself. ST will have to comment on what goes on, knowing I will catch each and every actual contradiction. One I will get to in a moment.
Let's talk this out. I am all very confident ears SG.
this feels slimy but the 420 line is funny-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
In post 429, Concorde wrote:In post 417, Shiba Tatsuya wrote:In post 416, Concorde wrote:Being on the defensive constantly is something many people read as scummy.
Correct.
I am fully prepared to handle such a scenario.
This post is directly in contradiction to ST stating that NA should focus on "absolving" the wagon on himself rather than attacking the logic behind shitty wagons. By focusing on defending himself, NA will look scummy and ST knows it. So why would ST advise NA to focus on peeling off his own wagon? So NA looks scummy and is lynched while ST can laugh on the sidelines saying "told you he was town".
this is p good though-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
In post 437, The Phantom of the Opera wrote:In post 155, Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy wrote:gumby is town af and these people mistakenly think they can deride him for an easy bad lynch
While I don't disagree with your call on Gumby, I very much dislike that your reasoning is so shallow at this point. The failure of a player to discern the alignment of another does not make them scum unless you believe they have the ability to make the proper call. You have no familiarity with any of these players, so in immediately making the call to strike out against them you are making the same mistake they themselves are making.
point conceded. i assumed people would be competent. not always a safe assumption
In post 156, Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy wrote:calling 'artificial' a scum tell in a game full of secret alts, lol ok whatever you say
trying to rely on old rules = scum doesn't know how to approach this game
The argument you imply in this post is also complete and utter nonsense unless somehow calling people artificial is an assertion that can only be made when one is aware of another's meta. Your thinking here is also binary to the point of being unbelievable. Your claim is that people relying on conventional beliefs somehow means that they are scum, but this argument requires completely how these conventional beliefs came into play in the first place (lots of people had them). I am uncomfortable with the logic you've presented thus far because it's very difficult to believe that a player actually believes in the arguments you're presenting, but I shall continue reading regardless.
the very first thing you notice in this game is that people are putting on personas to differentiate from their mains. over the first few pages in particular you really notice the kinds of personalities being displayed. artificiality is everywhere, it's built into the game, and blankly saying that artificiality = scum in the post that i quoted there looked like a total failure to consider context
In post 157, Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy wrote:knows greatvalue is town
This is yet another nonsense argument that you present. What in any of Natural Aristocracy's posts gives you the idea that he "knows" Greatvalue is town? What argument are you trying to imply here?
artistocracy presents greatvalue like it is a really strong vote ("far too strong-arming", presents caricature of his posts) and then immediately undermines it by saying "eh gets us out of rvs". that's the caveat for when/if greatvalue flips town and he can say 'no i definitely wasn't wilfully wagoning a townie early on, look i wasn't even that sure because i was mostly interested in getting out of rvs'. looks like he already knows that the wagon will eventually not look good-
-
Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 87
- Joined: October 11, 2015
In post 441, The Phantom of the Opera wrote:Your assertion, if you remember correctly, was that two players were pushing at Gumby and were scum as a result, which is functionally the same as claiming all players who push Gumby are scum if you don't give you a reason to differentiate, which you didn't. However, I am now more willing to play ball with you now that it seems like you've straightened up your act a bit. Why did you choose the two players to push that you did over any player that pushed Gumby?
i thought the why was obvious as i keep saying it (tone of their posts was immediate derision of the claim, which seems totally wrong town reaction to that claim)
This line of logic makes no sense to me based on the above quote.
Your claim with regards to your Gumby chainsaw was: because you picked on specific players and didn't say "all players who push Gumby are scum", your push was in depth and thus looking for intent.
Your claim with regards to Spider Gwen's reading of Dimitri is: because you said that a specific player sounding artificial made them scum, you are claiming that all people who sound artificial are scum and thus are providing a shallow thought process and am thus scum.
Can you explain these two positions for me in a way where they don't seem mutually exclusive to hold in one mind? If you'd like to claim that you're attempting different styles of scum hunting in the same post I suppose I'd let you slide, but otherwise, you have some explaining to do.
she literally said "his posts are artificial. which means he's scum", which is a blanket statement on what artificiality means. when she said it in that post, it wasn't "davidoff is artificial in this way which is different to other kinds of artificiality", it was "artificial means scum"
(again: i'm satisfied with the later explanation but the original post justified my interpretation)
In post 244, Fear Thy Name Is Dipsy wrote:town's going to get fed up with not being taken seriously and tone it down before long
scum keeps it going to hide behind
This seems like yet another of your "woefully shallow" accusations. Ignoring a player's posting because their spelling is poor is something that players with poor comprehension or a lack of patience are more likely to do than players who have a bit more patience for the absurd;this means that Megafan1998 is going to be treated differently by players based on their personalities and not on their alignment. In this case, it seems pretty reasonable for Megafan1998 as town to continue with his gimmick because it's fun for him and because he dislikes the players with a lack of patience and reading comprehension.
I, of course, detest his style and pray that he will stop of his own accord. If this post was nothing more than an incentive to get him to stop, I apologize but believe asking nicely would be a more productive route. If this post was an attempt to discern his alignment and a genuine line of thought, then I'm afraid you've failed.
you have not understood. i did not say that only town would ignore megafan for his spelling (what underlined sentence implies i said). i agree it's personality. which means likely large subset of game, regardless of alignment, ignores megafan, which frustrates megafan if town or gives him license as scum. megafan likely enjoys it even as town, obv, but will he enjoy it enough to risk nobody listening to him. scum is happier to coast on that than town
i might have exaggerated for effect but i believe in the logic
-