Newbie 2012 - Game Over
-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
Protip: You can only vote for players in the game, and not the moderator.In post 17, ItalianoVD wrote:Looks like we're playing together again pii. What's up bud.
Oh yeah
VOTE: Micc
As a golden gopher fan, I can't believe he's broadcasting that thing in his avatar.
Player list:
3bounty
piisirrational
WaltertheDunce10
ItalianoVD
UNOwen
Ydrasse
DoctorPepper (SE)
GuiltyLion (SE)
72offsuit (SE)-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
Signalling leaving RvS pretty much defeats the purpose of what follows.In post 19, DoctorPepper wrote:
VOTE: ItalianoIn post 17, ItalianoVD wrote:Looks like we're playing together again pii. What's up bud.
Oh yeah
VOTE: Micc
As a golden gopher fan, I can't believe he's broadcasting that thing in his avatar.
Let's leave RVS. Anyone can tell me why this vote is scummy?
It's like telling someone, "don't worry, there won't be any side effects to this new medication, it's just a placebo".-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
-0.25 points for wasting a vote by OMGUSing voting an SE who isn;t going to tell you squat from his reaction
-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
In post 21, 72offsuit wrote:
Signalling leaving RvS pretty much defeats the purpose of what follows.In post 19, DoctorPepper wrote:
VOTE: ItalianoIn post 17, ItalianoVD wrote:Looks like we're playing together again pii. What's up bud.
Oh yeah
VOTE: Micc
As a golden gopher fan, I can't believe he's broadcasting that thing in his avatar.
Let's leave RVS. Anyone can tell me why this vote is scummy?
It's like telling someone, "don't worry, there won't be any side effects to this new medication, it's just a placebo".In post 22, DoctorPepper wrote:Sorry but what was the point of that post?In post 24, UNOwen wrote:Hello everyone
This looks like a good place to start VOTE: ItalianoVD
Can you explain what you mean by this?In post 21, 72offsuit wrote: Signalling leaving RvS pretty much defeats the purpose of what follows.
It's like telling someone, "don't worry, there won't be any side effects to this new medication, it's just a placebo".
I'm saying DP's "Let's leave RVS" is LAMISTY and forced. Doesn't sound natural to me.-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
Fence-sitting. Why mention it if you aren't going to make a call either way?In post 30, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:I agree with your point on Owen ,but it is in the early stages.
I don't know if 26 is indicative of anything yet.
Scum points: -0.25-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
So what is !scum72offsuit's agenda and how does it further !scum victory condition?In post 39, DoctorPepper wrote:^ then what's the point of RVS then?
Even if it's a random vote, the point of RVS is to gain information from why the random votes were made. I.e. if you give a vote without information, then it's a reason to talk about you.
That being said, I actually think 72 is scummier, but lets wait for Italiano-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
By the way, need more votes on Dunce.
Classic greeting-the-entire-thread scum tell:
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=79490-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
1. What do you mean by "discrediting"?In post 47, DoctorPepper wrote:Well you're clearly discrediting my take as being forced.
Would it have been different if I didn't say "let's leave RVS"?
I'm saying your post gives me a non-genuine/forced/fake sort of vibe.
2. Yes, as the "let's leave RVS" on its own is LAMISTY. The argument against Italiano, independently of "let's leave RVS" though, is really lame.
I don;t see a scum-rolling player sitting there thinking, "oh gee, I'm really worried my RVS-vote (which is exactly what is expected of you and what pretty much everyone is doing) will draw suspicion towards, I'll vote the mod instead"
3. Do you think RVS voting the mod is scummier, less scummy, or neither, as compared to not RVS voting at all?-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
1) Dunce+Unowen. Gut.In post 52, TheThirteenthJT wrote:Hey everyone. I'm coming in witH the two following questions that I would like all to answer please. Mostly for fun since it's so early in the game.
1) Random guess or analysis of what we have so far, take a crack at the scumteam. Who is the mafia team in this game?
2) If you were mafia in this game, who would you like to be your partner, or who would most likely be your partner.
2) Would like: GuiltyLion. Most likely Ydrasse.-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
1. Ok. You seem particularly ready to attribute my read of your post as being LAMISTy and scummy, down to a scum agenda on my behalf. i.e discrediting my intentions. Hypocritical perhaps, no? Pot calling the kettle black?In post 50, DoctorPepper wrote:1. Saying my post is non genuine or forced IS DISCREDITING. It's like you're saying in posting for the sake of being active instead of actually hunting
2. the point of RVS is to see where the votes go and to create a starting point. Voting for the mod is a classic non committal vote common and it's something that deprives us of any info. Yes they could do that because scum might not want be linked to anything. The point is, distilling it to "this is shallow" is discrediting the entire premise of it and just flat out paints me as scummy for having legitimate concerns. Also saying let's leave RVS doesn't really do much except signify that it's a serious vote. Would you have batted an eye if I said "serious vote" instead
3. Not voting at all isn't scummy if the player wasn't active. RVS voting the mod is scummier regardless because some people may not know of RVS. In fact, I've seen newbie games where town doesn't wanna participate in it
2. Perhaps I am being caught up in the semantics of wording. But sometimes the choice of one's words can be telling. You could realistically have said phrase X (serious vote) , but instead you said Y (lets leave RVS)
3. OK. Fair.-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
Agreed. Everything is a stretch at the start, and then as the day progresses more clues are revealed.In post 56, UNOwen wrote:
A bit of stretching is necessary this early on or I don't know how progress would be made.In post 38, Ydrasse wrote: not really, no. i feel that thinking it suspicious is a bit of a stretch, really — people in rvs are going to be a bit more silly/lighthearted until people start really scumhunting. that, and i'm of the opinion that mafia are more likely to come into this game with a serious attitude than something silly that draws attention to them.-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
Please elaborate on how something can be both forced, but also sincere?In post 57, UNOwen wrote:
Ah right that makes sense. It was a bit forced, but I think it was sincere in pushing things forward.In post 42, 72offsuit wrote: I'm saying DP's "Let's leave RVS" is LAMISTY and forced. Doesn't sound natural to me.
Some casual games on different forums many years ago. I'm pretty sure I ended up making an account here and played a game or two but I didn't stick around.In post 44, 72offsuit wrote:@ Everyone:
1) What is your experience with playing mafia?
2) Do you prefer playing town or scum?
3) What do you think of the Policy lynch of Lynch All Lurkers?
Town
I approve
What do you make of Ydrasse, myself and now JT who also did this?In post 46, 72offsuit wrote:By the way, need more votes on Dunce.
Classic greeting-the-entire-thread scum tell:
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=79490-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
Was wondering who would ask me this first re: the hello greeting of others. Ill get back to you on this soon, just not yet, for my own reasons. If i haven't remembered to reanswer this later in rhis game day then please pull me up on it, but hopefully that wont b requiredIn post 57, UNOwen wrote:
Ah right that makes sense. It was a bit forced, but I think it was sincere in pushing things forward.In post 42, 72offsuit wrote: I'm saying DP's "Let's leave RVS" is LAMISTY and forced. Doesn't sound natural to me.
Some casual games on different forums many years ago. I'm pretty sure I ended up making an account here and played a game or two but I didn't stick around.In post 44, 72offsuit wrote:@ Everyone:
1) What is your experience with playing mafia?
2) Do you prefer playing town or scum?
3) What do you think of the Policy lynch of Lynch All Lurkers?
Town
I approve
What do you make of Ydrasse, myself and now JT who also did this?In post 46, 72offsuit wrote:By the way, need more votes on Dunce.
Classic greeting-the-entire-thread scum tell:
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=79490-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
Im a bit torn regarding early outing of early town reads. Generally town read players just tend to get killed off and you get left with the scumbuckets. Though obviously taking a stance is important so others can get a read of yourself.In post 63, GuiltyLion wrote:I think Ydrasse, UNOwen, DoctorPepper are all likely town
What are your thoughts re: the benefits of posting these early town reads vs the cons?-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
1. You aren't doing youself a favour here. Pushing someone as being scum by using someone else's logic is scummy.In post 69, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:
I agree on your points, so far I would say my scum team would be 72 and DoctorpepperIn post 68, TheThirteenthJT wrote:
I called it artificial because that what it looks like. Basically I need a reason to start a push on someone to make myself useful to the town on page one, get early scumhunting credit and zoom out. I've seen this done before and always pings me early in games. Both Doctorpepper and Uno have done this with what I found to be a lol vote by Italiano.In post 62, GuiltyLion wrote:
I also don't like this voteIn post 54, TheThirteenthJT wrote:I find the whole modvote situation to have been artificially blown up. This sets my eyes early on Doctorpepper.
VOTE: Doctorpepper
Why do you choose to describe it as "artificial"? What is the scum motive to play the way Doctorpepper is playing, and why is that more likely than town!Doctorpepper trying to find scum?
VOTE: TheThirteenthJT
Now don't get me wrong. Early game voting is always a crapshoot. So since Italiano was receiving early game pressure, I want to pressure the counterside and see reactions as well. Thus my vote.
I really feel that town has nothing to lose by answering those questions. It can alert us of anyone potentially buddying us early in the game and gives us something to look back at later as the game progresses.In post 61, GuiltyLion wrote:
on the other hand, I don't really like these questions, they don't seem very likely to actually lead to useful content. We should always be talking about 1) in the general sense constantly anyways, and 2) is just a WIFOM festIn post 52, TheThirteenthJT wrote:1) Random guess or analysis of what we have so far, take a crack at the scumteam. Who is the mafia team in this game?
2) If you were mafia in this game, who would you like to be your partner, or who would most likely be your partner.
I do agree we should be sharing our reads constantly throughout the game. This is just a fun little encouragement to do so this early in.
Now as to the second point, I don't think WiFOM is all bad. I rather not answer why until more people answer the question. Then I will feel free explaining what I like about this question. This is also a trial run question for me.
2. Probably Guiltylion,
I am not sure why 72 would push for my lynch so quickly, it seems off to me.
Oh I lynched a townie? Oh well wasnt my fault, it was player X's case, lets lynch player X now.
2. Why not? You don't see !townMe putting pressure on a player I see as scummy?-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
Can you elaborate further on why you see myself and DP as scum. Please distil the case, step by step, as if im a 9 year old, even if you have to repeat the logic presented my another player.In post 69, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:
I agree on your points, so far I would say my scum team would be 72 and DoctorpepperIn post 68, TheThirteenthJT wrote:
I called it artificial because that what it looks like. Basically I need a reason to start a push on someone to make myself useful to the town on page one, get early scumhunting credit and zoom out. I've seen this done before and always pings me early in games. Both Doctorpepper and Uno have done this with what I found to be a lol vote by Italiano.In post 62, GuiltyLion wrote:
I also don't like this voteIn post 54, TheThirteenthJT wrote:I find the whole modvote situation to have been artificially blown up. This sets my eyes early on Doctorpepper.
VOTE: Doctorpepper
Why do you choose to describe it as "artificial"? What is the scum motive to play the way Doctorpepper is playing, and why is that more likely than town!Doctorpepper trying to find scum?
VOTE: TheThirteenthJT
Now don't get me wrong. Early game voting is always a crapshoot. So since Italiano was receiving early game pressure, I want to pressure the counterside and see reactions as well. Thus my vote.
I really feel that town has nothing to lose by answering those questions. It can alert us of anyone potentially buddying us early in the game and gives us something to look back at later as the game progresses.In post 61, GuiltyLion wrote:
on the other hand, I don't really like these questions, they don't seem very likely to actually lead to useful content. We should always be talking about 1) in the general sense constantly anyways, and 2) is just a WIFOM festIn post 52, TheThirteenthJT wrote:1) Random guess or analysis of what we have so far, take a crack at the scumteam. Who is the mafia team in this game?
2) If you were mafia in this game, who would you like to be your partner, or who would most likely be your partner.
I do agree we should be sharing our reads constantly throughout the game. This is just a fun little encouragement to do so this early in.
Now as to the second point, I don't think WiFOM is all bad. I rather not answer why until more people answer the question. Then I will feel free explaining what I like about this question. This is also a trial run question for me.
2. Probably Guiltylion,
I am not sure why 72 would push for my lynch so quickly, it seems off to me.-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
What explanantions or case are you expecting early on in day 1 of the game?In post 72, ItalianoVD wrote:So DoctorPepper and UNOwen voting for me on day one without explanation. Seems pretty convenient. You two just shot up my scum read list.-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
You said you didn't like UNO not making his reasoning for his vote clear but yet you town read him. Please explain.In post 63, GuiltyLion wrote:I think Ydrasse, UNOwen, DoctorPepper are all likely town-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
Just putting on my SE hat on here (my first time being an SE by the way)In post 81, ItalianoVD wrote:Pretty much everyone who saw my initial post for what it was seems the likeliest to be town so far to me. GuiltyLion, Ydrasse, 72 and pii. I’ve already mentioned my two top scumreads. (my voters)
Besides I’d love to believe I could work with Hobbes to find these scum and eventually solve this game, eh?
If you are town here, my advice is just be careful in future games. If you scumread players who vote you and towneead people who have townread/defended/not attacked yourself over a post,
Scum can manipulate you based off that alone and ensure they dont scumread you.
Basically, if i was playing with you in a game following this eg Newbie 2020, then my scum strategy would be to buddy you, as i read you as a player susceptible to pocketing/buddying.
Then again, maybe im talking absolute crap, then take it with a pinch of salt.-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
Why ONE of them, why could both not be truthful? It doesn't sound like coming from your post you even consider yourself being wrong.In post 82, TheThirteenthJT wrote:
Even though I find it scummy as well, I doubt both mafia would use the same point to push you early game. One of them to me is being truthful.In post 81, ItalianoVD wrote:Pretty much everyone who saw my initial post for what it was seems the likeliest to be town so far to me. GuiltyLion, Ydrasse, 72 and pii. I’ve already mentioned my two top scumreads. (my voters)
Besides I’d love to believe I could work with Hobbes to find these scum and eventually solve this game, eh?
Where do I fall in your reads? And Walter?-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
Agree, without meaning to be harsh, just providing (possibly unwanted )feedback.In post 97, GuiltyLion wrote:
this isn't really an inspiring postIn post 72, ItalianoVD wrote:So DoctorPepper and UNOwen voting for me on day one without explanation. Seems pretty convenient. You two just shot up my scum read list.
Imagine if the 8 other players also said, "hey, player X voted for me. I'm town, therefore player X is probably scum".-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
What's the purpose of this unvote and re-vote?In post 66, TheThirteenthJT wrote:
UNVOTE: doctorpepperIn post 55, DoctorPepper wrote:Yeah that's a wasted vote.
I don't think there is such a thing as a wasted vote when things can be so easily retracted. Let me rephrase that, I don't think there is anything such as a wasted vote this early in the game. No one is exempt until confirmed town.
VOTE: doctorpepper-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
Are you saying that you find trying to lead town as being scummy?In post 120, UNOwen wrote:
This is a newbie game, I can see an experienced player making statements with more authority than they otherwise would (especially in the very early game) in order to get things moving. So the "Let's leave RVS" was forced but the motivation behind it came across as sincere and not an attempt to put on "town leader" hat.In post 103, 72offsuit wrote: Please elaborate on how something can be both forced, but also sincere?
Murder mysteries are fun, I enjoy trying to figure things out.
-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
And that's exactly my point why your post 82 is scummy.In post 124, TheThirteenthJT wrote:
You know you are right here. I was so focused on tHis point that I didn't give myself the option to say both are town. I think in reference to it I would have preferred to say something along the lines of ..In post 112, 72offsuit wrote:
Why ONE of them, why could both not be truthful? It doesn't sound like coming from your post you even consider yourself being wrong.In post 82, TheThirteenthJT wrote:
Even though I find it scummy as well, I doubt both mafia would use the same point to push you early game. One of them to me is being truthful.In post 81, ItalianoVD wrote:Pretty much everyone who saw my initial post for what it was seems the likeliest to be town so far to me. GuiltyLion, Ydrasse, 72 and pii. I’ve already mentioned my two top scumreads. (my voters)
Besides I’d love to believe I could work with Hobbes to find these scum and eventually solve this game, eh?
Where do I fall in your reads? And Walter?
If there is scum in this push it would only be one and not both.
And this early in the game I know I could be wrong, well at any point I could be wrong. But if I don't push what I see or at least make an attempt to call something out that strikes me wrong, I am doing a disservice to myself and to my team.
It doesn't read to me as coming from a town mindset, ie - that of a player who is in the dark as to other's alignments.
Furthermore, I dislike your concern about how you are being read by others (walter), it gives me the impression of a mindset of scum-survivalism.-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
I've asked this question in a previous newbie game and I found it helpful.In post 131, TheThirteenthJT wrote:In post 44, 72offsuit wrote:@ Everyone:
1) What is your experience with playing mafia?
2) Do you prefer playing town or scum?
3) What do you think of the Policy lynch of Lynch All Lurkers?
I forgot to ask, why the last question? I shouldn't have answered it because doesn't it tip off the mafia to be more or less active depending on peoples answers?
It also forces players to take a stance on lurking. If a player says they think lurking is NAI (non-alignment-indicative) and then they later vote for a player for lurking, then you have a contradiction then.
I guess I can ask your 2nd question right back at you.
Hypothetical scenario: we are playing in Newbie #2020.
I am town and ask this question.
You are scum and see the responses.
Does !scumYou use these responses to adjust your playstyle?-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
@ ItalianoVD regarding reply to your post 136 :
1. My opinion of walter - slightly scummy
a) 30 sheeps GL's view of Owen without expanding and fence sits Re: 26. Then in 31 further adds to it as being a "good post" , which feels like pocketing
b) Says he thinks its a 72 + DP team, which is scummy for 2 reasons:
i) I don't think this scumteam seems believe from !TownWalter's PoV. Scum vs scum theatre seems like an unlikely thing to develop from page 1.
ii) It feels opportunistic to scumread both players in an early conflict - easy pickings for an easy mislynch, as can easily hop onto either potentially developing wagon
2. a) Walter - scum gut read - See above
b) Owen - scum gut read - 33 - felt like an overly defensive response
3. My impressions of GL is that they are a skilled, but not arrogant player, who has good reads.
Ydrasse as a possible partner as I havent addressed them. Scum theatre is hard and requires effort.-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
Sorry, I meant Italiano, not Walter. In post 82 you ask Italiano about his read on yourself and Walter.In post 152, TheThirteenthJT wrote:Ydrasse I am a skeptical person and I don't like townreading people. So I don't townread DrPepper but it instead ai now find him less suspicious than Unowen.
Also I think Walter was referencing my question to 72 as to why question number 3 is important. And how it could give scum a chance to change their gamestlye. Piisirrational coming in shortly after to post and popping out again would be exactly why. Has he now been lurking knowing we won't policy lynch? Or is it truly just not available currently to be posting a lot? That question could have influenced his play style if he is scum.
72 did I ask Walter for his read on me? I don't remember and I won't get much of a chance to look back this weekend. I normally don't ask people to read me unless I feel they are buddying me. Usually at that point I'll ask without referring to the buddying to see if it was them agreeing with my point or if there was I'll intentions behind it.
I do know I have my read on him earlier.
I'm getting scumvibes from quite a bit of people this game as well. Little ones that ive posted here and there compared to my previous game lol.
Regardless, your concern Re: the read of others on yourself is scummy.-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
There is no NEED. Its just something i WANT a general concensus of opinions on, as opposed to specifically this game related sort of a question.In post 143, Ydrasse wrote:@72offsuit:regarding 105, why did you feel the need to ask this question? this post pinged me a bit because i feel like you're asking about trs/talking about them for, fmpov, isn't the right reason to do so?
also, you threw down your vote on jt with no explanation in the post itself; do you sr him for the reasons in 112, and do you still find him scummy after him clarifying what he meant?
I think I'm starting to come round to only posting my townreads from day2. I just feel like outing townreads on day 1 just gets them killed a lot of the time on night 1. I'm a bit over being night killed for being too town. I'm yet to advance past day 2.-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
Yes. He is my top scumread at the moment and I think he is a good player to wagon on.In post 143, Ydrasse wrote:@72offsuit:regarding 105, why did you feel the need to ask this question? this post pinged me a bit because i feel like you're asking about trs/talking about them for, fmpov, isn't the right reason to do so?
also, you threw down your vote on jt with no explanation in the post itself; do you sr him for the reasons in 112, and do you still find him scummy after him clarifying what he meant?
1. His scummy post 82 which I;ve elaborated on in 112 and 150
2. I agree with GL's post 62 TTJT's vote feels really opportunistic jumping on an early conflict - grounds that are ripe for an easy mislynch
3. I'm OK with the others on the wagon, I don;t scumread GL or Ydrasse at this stage-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
Err, please don't self vote, regardless of your alignment.
You are doing just fine. What has caused you to come to the conclusion that you "understand nothing in this game"?
Mafia is a game that involves deception on the part of mafia, so it can get heated and frustrating at times, but in the end its a game and its for fun. If you really aren't enjoying the game, then thats fine too, its not for everyone, or sometimes you just need a break.
You can always ask for the mod to replace you out of the game, but i would strongly encourage you to give this game a go. This playing roster seems like a nice group of people (my last game OTOH got a bit toxic).-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
??In post 175, GuiltyLion wrote:
This is a bad point.In post 150, 72offsuit wrote:Furthermore, I dislike your concern about how you are being read by others (walter), it gives me the impression of a mindset of scum-survivalism.
Townies should be concerned with how people view them too, I don't think being worried about why you are being scumread is scum-indicative. Also, I may be misunderstanding or missing something, but in that quoted post I think he's asking Italiano about his read on Walter, not worried about how Walter is reading him
See TTJT's response. He confirms he does ask Italiano for both their read on walter AND on TTJT (himself)-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
Ok much appreciated for the response.In post 170, GuiltyLion wrote:
Honestly I've experimented with some different styles regarding sharing townreads and I don't think there's a one-size-fits-all best approach to this dilemma. I think sharing townreads is important because it is a way to tell others who you will NOT vote, it helps build thread consensus and shape the pool of players up for debate about who might be scum. It narrows the trajectories scum can take by reducing the amount of slots they can effectively push.In post 105, 72offsuit wrote:Im a bit torn regarding early outing of early town reads. Generally town read players just tend to get killed off and you get left with the scumbuckets. Though obviously taking a stance is important so others can get a read of yourself.
What are your thoughts re: the benefits of posting these early town reads vs the cons?
However, I do think it's valuable to not always explain how strong your townread is, or why you are townreading people in complete detail, because that info does help scum figure out their standing and who might be mislynchable later, and helps them make better NKs.
So it depends. I think I tend to gravitate towards oversharing as town because I think transparency and being correctly townread is extremely valuable and overall makes the game state harder for scum, even with the drawbacks. But there are times when it's correct to mask a little bit about why you townread certain players or how confident you are in it, that's partly why I kinda rebuffed Ydrasse's question.
This pretty much id exactly what sort of a response i was after. Yeah, this probs doesnt belong within a game thread, but meh.
Think ill continue to keep my town and null reads jumbled up on day one.
Only point i dont get, is that narrowing trajectories part. As town, im more than happy for scum to push obv town, and in doing so make themselves look more Scummy.-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
I just read your previous game Italiano. I can see you were lynched day one as townie. I can reiterate what NK15 said in the post game there. Scumhunting isnt easy, not only for newbies, but also for more experienced players.
I see you scumread piisirrational in that game as well as NK15 who were both town, but dont be discouraged. Sometimes you can help town not necessarily by nailing scum by your own reads, but rather just being genuine and other players reading you as town, thus allowingbthem to identify scum through process of elimination (PoE)
I mean odds are, any given townie WILL be wrong in their reads. From town PoV, any particular scumread has just a 2/8 or 25 percent chance of actually being scum.-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
It's just trial and error. You can;t expect to be a pro in just 2 games.
1) Read the wiki regarding strategy and common scum tells
2) After a game reflect on what you thought were scum tells. If that player was in fact town, perhaps that scum tell isnt a thing?
If you read someone as town, who was in fact scum, then your reasoning for townreading them is not reliable-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
72's UVC:
ItalianoVD (3) - DoctorPepper, UNOwen, Ydrasse
TheThirteenthJT (1) - 72offsuit
UNOwen (2) - TheThirteenthJT, ItalianoVD
piisirrational (2) - WaltertheDunce10, GuiltyLion
Not Voting (1) - piisirrational
With 9 players alive it takes 5 votes to lynch.
The deadline for Day 1 is in 6 days, 19 hours, 27 minutes.
Please correct me if I'm wrong-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
In post 201, UNOwen wrote:
Well you asked me why scum-you would put a target on their back, I'm answering that scum-you wouldn't think they were putting a target on their back. You can say that's not how scum-you would act but it doesn't really help me because you could be lying.In post 188, ItalianoVD wrote: You and I both don't know this. Maybe scum you wouldn't think that, but you don't know what scum me would think and neither do I.
No, I no longer think it is likely that you and JT are scum together. I am struggling with his approach to the game but I doubt you would have twice called him out for voting with you if you were partners. The point you make about pi in your next post is a solid observation and not something I had picked up on, I was surprised to see that pi posted a read list as early as page 4 in that game. It would be good to hear his explanation for why he is now playing so passively.In post 188, ItalianoVD wrote: Do you still think that TTJT is my scum partner? Because I think maybe pii is yours.
I appreciate that they are now answered, but why did you initially skip over my questions in post 136?
Also:
What did you have in mind when you talked about a partner protecting you?In post 79, ItalianoVD wrote:I have a question for my voters: DoctorPepper and UNOwen
Even though I am a noob to this version of the game and on this forum, it’s pretty normal and common in scumming/wolfing 101 to not bring any undue and unnecessary attention to yourself. It pretty much puts a target on your back. I don’t know the meta of this site yet, but that seems like something that will never change.
So my question is if I was scum what would be the benefit to me and/or my partner (whether they were a noob or experienced) to put such a blatant target on my back and possibly their back for attempting to “protect” me. If there is a benefit I don’t know about, that’s why I’m asking.
I really hate these early association analyses, of the form "player A is unlikely to be with player B"
From what I;ve seen to date, they tend to come from scum.
The pre-flip association analysis this early is giving me the vibe of awkward-scum faking contribution. Rarely does this speculation prove fruitful.
I'm also disliking the "scum-you" would do X,Y and Z. Everyone plays scum differently. It seems really disingenuous to be making such sweeping generalisations of IVD.-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
In post 216, GuiltyLion wrote:ah and I forgot to reply to the other part
keeping in mind that these were early game townreads and there's more to work off of now:
Ydrasse - I'm in the process of rethinking how strongly I originally townread this slot, but I thought the way she followed up on my pressure on UNOwen in 35 and 38 felt agendaless -> instead of trying to escalate conflict or push players, it felt like she was approaching things with a perspective to understand.
DoctorPepper - took strong initiative in pressure people early and I thought the pressure hit town notes of "something potentially suspicious" without going too far into exaggeration/embellishment. Also thought the emotion about being discredited in 50 was genuine
UNOwen - I already answered this one, but he didn't feel defensive in his replies to me on page 2 and I thought the reasoning for voting Italiano was earnest, even if it wasn't presented at first.
anyway that was my reasoning at the time, but I'm in the process of re-evaluating, so stay tuned
Your townread of Uno is extremely lame and feels disingenuous. Im paraphrasing here, but It seems to me to boil down to:
"His response did not particularly feel scummy" - this is a garbage reason to town read someone. This is a NAI thing, AT BEST.
"Reasoning for voting IVD was earnest", is also pretty lame.-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
In post 217, GuiltyLion wrote:I mostly really didn't like how he formed his scumreads around those voting him in 72, and I thought his defense of "what would be the benefit of putting a target on my back" was scummy because it's clear he didn't think it would put a target on his back regardless of his alignment, otherwise he wouldn't do it, as you also pointed out in 201.
I also got the vibe that he was buddying me in 81
1. Why don;t you really like that the scumreads are around those voting him? I find this is a common newbie thing to do, so I;m not really seeing why this is pinging you as being particularly scummy, given in your own words, he has a 75% of being town, from a townie point of view. I would say !scumnewbies are more likely to lie low, not OMGUS those voting them.
2. Yeah nah, disagree. Buddying is rarely that blatant IMO.-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
In post 218, GuiltyLion wrote:so I've just quickly skimmed/reread through the game
my opening tack here was trying to sort a few newbies, mainly TTJT and Italiano, cause I didn't hit an early townread from either and I tend to find newbie scum are easy to catch with a little pushing and prodding. However, as they posted more their thought processes became more clear to me and I don't especially think either is scum, which left me feeling a little aimless and wanting to reset a bit and reread.
Overall, I still townread Ydrasse, UNOwen, DoctorPepper as well - it's definitely possible that one is competent scum fooling me, but even when I went back to see if I could find avenues to where they're potentially playing to a scum agenda, nothing stood out to me.
I townread Walter as well. I think he's engaging in the game in a loose and carefree way which is difficult for scum, especially newbie scum, to emulate effectively. And I think the suspicion on 72 is genuine because there was not a ton of explicit support there and 72 strikes me as a slot that would be intimidating to push for a mislynch if you know he's town and you're not experienced/adept as scum.
which leaves piisirrational and 72offsuit. I scumread both of these slots and would currently be fine with a lynch on either.
Let's start with pi - I think Italiano makes a good point about pi's lack of activity, and I think the posts pididleave us with are very inoffensive and meant to blend in. His take on Italiano in 65 is pure hedge, he doesn't scumread or townread Italiano on it (giving flexibility to take a read in either direction as the situation develops), he sheeps the reasoning Ydrasse already gave, and it's ultimately a post that neither develops any reads on any of the players involved, and also will not cause conflict with anybody in the situation.
It's made worse by the fact that he shades DoctorPepper in 138 onlyafterbeing prompted -> if these thoughts were there at the time of 65, he chose not to post them, so to me it seems likely that pi only came up with this reasoning because they had to after the fact.
139 has much of the same problems as 65. Simply telling people stuff is NAI and not making any effort to instead highlight things thatareAI, or generate content. It's classic newbie scum posting.
VOTE: piisirrational slot
As for 72, I imagine this is a harder sell as he strikes me as a competent player and I can definitely empathize with why some of you townread him. With him, it's more of a process of elimination from my townreads and anabsenceof towniness than any clear scum-motive to his posting. 72 is making an effort to ask questions and give thoughts and participate in conversation, but none of them ever gave me good feels in the way that most of the other players posts have. I recognize that's a vague and holistic assessment, I'm not sure how to explain it convincingly, but I want it noted down for future reference. I can also call out a couple of minor things which aren't especially scummy on their own, but together serve as circumstantial evidence that makes me feel validated in this PoE read:
- I only paid attention to this on reread, but he calls out Walter for the "greet the thread tell" (46) while seemingly missing that Ydrasse also greeted the thread (7). I think if he was genuinely scouting for this tell in RVS, he would have noticed that both players did it. Especially because when he voted Walter in post 12 he didn't mention the tell, he only brought it up later. That feels more likely to be scum adding justifications to their vote after the fact than town who noticed it to begin with. Props to Owen who called him out on this in 57, and I don't think 72 ever gave an explanation for it - which he did promise in 104. Let's hear that explanation now?
- I brought this up already, but I really didn't like the implication in 150 that TTJT was scummy for worrying about how he's perceived. Sure, it's survivalistic in nature, but both town or scum players generally want to survive and understand how they're being read by other players in the game. The idea of "scum"-survivalism specifically is doing a lot of legwork to mask the fact that 72 isn't actually explaining why TTJT asking for reads on himself is more likely to be scum behavior than town behavior.
- Given that I find piisirational decent odds of scum, I'm looking for people who haven't paid any attention to pi or put any pressure there. 72 has not once mentioned his play in this game at all. This alone is not scum-indicative - I myself also haven't mentioned pi up to this point! (but I'm doing it now!) - but if we see a red flip on that slot I'd be very wary of anyone who didn't engage with or mention him in any substantive way, and 72 fits that profile.
There's a few things to like and a few things I dislike here.
1. Re: GL's opening moves - seems a reasonable explanation Re: the flow of his posts throughout the game,
though 2 things are troubling me.
a) The quick change of heart off the TTJT wagon.
In moving off the TTJT wagon, 172 , GL simply says "That said, I appreciate your explanation here and I think the overall post feels genuine"
TTJT,'s response in 123 does not particuarly strike me as being convincingly of a town mindset.
TTJT says of Doctorpepper, that he is "an experienced player pushing a newbie [IVD] who has not been on RVS on this site before".
-- which is untrue as IVD has played a game previously and has been through RVS.
I disagree that a single early-game vote, as DP voted IVD, compares to TTJT being actually lynched for his newbie "no lynch" play.
What I;m trying to say is, I'm not really liking GL's rationale and the shift away here from pressuring TTJT.
b) I'm not really understanding what has brought on the self-reflection/self explanation. It's kinda reading as being a little overly self-conscious - it wasn;t really called for by anyone and points a little towards a guilty conscience.
2. The statement re: TRing of Ydrasse, UNOwen, DoctorPepper can go either way. It's very easy for !scumGL to just throw out a few cheap TRs here without real explanation
I'm OK with him NOT elaborating the strength of his reads, just making the point that its a very non-committal approach for !scumGL here, that leaves !scumGL with flexibility who to try to mislynch in the days ahead,
whilst also potentially trying to gain townie points for appearing to develop reads as well as the pocketing of said players.
3. The townread of walter here feels genuine and the description of watler as being "loose and carefree" seems appropriate.
Donl;t really agree with the 2nd point here. It's not like !scumWalter is solo and has to create a perfect storm for myself to be mislynched on his lonesome.
4. Voting a replacing out/AFK player feels like a waste of a vote, and basically suiting scum agenda its not like pi can reply.
Even in getting a reply from the replacement here, its very easy for !scumSera to read the thread and take the path thats best suits scumagenda, as they are not tied to their predecessors "reads"
Voting/FoSing a lurker in !townPi/now-Sera (easy mislynch target), as well as a "competent" player in myself (removal of a potential threat), would certainly suit !scumagenda.
Obviously that depends on pi/Sera's alignment. [not that I;m a particularly good player or anything, but I do ahave a couple of games under my belt]
5. The overall assessment of my slot feels genuine, although it is misguided for !townGL or shady for !scumGL.
a) I pretty much have caught scum as cop, primarily off the same sentiment as that proprosed here by GL, namely an absence of townie vibes from LL in Newbie 2001.
viewtopic.php?f=50&t=82865
Only 1 other player (fwog) scumreads LL.
What I'm trying to say, is that I can see !townGL's viewpoint here.
b) I'm OK to explain this now. My singling out of a single player despite several players greeting the whole thread, was intentional.
I've tried out the newbie greeting = scum theory and it was a crock of crap, where we vote for our tracker, lol.
See: Newbie 1994
viewtopic.php?f=50&t=82538
I picked walter as my RVS, as it was his first game, and thought I'd be more likely to get an alignment-indicative reaction
from him than a more expreienced player.
I also chose to push him on the "greeting-scum-tell" because it was his first game, whereas Ydrasse already had played a game.
I wanted to see others reactions to my overzealous and lame push on walter. No bites on the fishing rod.
c) We can agree to disagree here. Being concerned with reads on yourself IS a trait that scum tend to have.
I don;t see why I ahve to explain this point. Does anyone else disagree with me here?
Scum wants to know of other's reads on themselves to manipulate who they vote and lynch, and who they will elect to night kill.
In 175 , GL states: "Townies should be concerned with how people view them too, I don't think being worried about why you are being scumread is scum-indicative.
Well, TTJT in 82 , does NOT ask for an EXPLANATION WHY for a SCUMREAD, as GL stated, but simply asks "Where do I fall in your reads?"
So my point still stands, TTJT's 82 IS scummy. Saying my implication that TTJT is scummy, does not feel like a genuine point here from GL.
d) This last point is just garbage. There is like 0 to interact with pi over - as GL himself states.-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
AtE = Appeal to Emotion
Verbatim off the wiki
https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?ti ... to_Emotion
An appeal to emotion is a particularly devious sort of fallacious argument, particularly in a game of unknowns such as Mafia. "If you lynch me, you'll lose!" is an easy example, but there are many others, played by both/all Factions in most games at some point. The nature of the game lends itself to appeals to fear or hope or trust.
This tactic is in general very effective against people who are not aware of it. As such, deploying it in a Mafia game with experienced players tends to backfire, as they'll be aware that you're trying to manipulate them, behaviour which is more typically seen coming from scum than from town.-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
Overall gamestate-wise, Pii lurking and being replaced and DP being on VLA has resulted in the same (relatively) few people posting.
Uno is still on IVD (the leading wagon), who Uno originally voted for in RVS, which is telling, I think, given Uno is also a leading wagon.
My preferred lynchpool is {TTJT , Uno}
As it stands, I wouldn't lose sleep over lynching pi/Sera if it comes to it.-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
Why would IVD bussing pii be easier at this time?In post 222, Ydrasse wrote:i don't think that wagoning the slot is inherently a bad idea just because someone's gonna replace into it.
however, my poe still includes italiano as a potential solve; rereading his iso (b/c of their self-vote from yesterday), his only mention of pii before they started adding pii into their solve was 81 where they townread them. and then they come back to that slot in 188 with a scumread.
i think that what pinged me about this was that it came after italiano self-voting. while i think that frustration is within a vacuum nai, that he had pressure on him and then turned to a self-vote after feels very ate-y to me. the vibe i got was that it was a bit dramatic (that being "i've tried to no avail.") before it was being brushed off and he replaced his vote on his scumread and jumped back in. it feels as if the pii scumread of convenience because italiano doesn't interact with the content of the few posts themselves.
supporting the idea that italiano could theoretically do this as scum is 204, in which he says he's been in wolf games before this and has done bold moves which to me reads as a dissonance between something i pointed out in 79 and 91, where he asserts that he is a new player to this sort of stuff. i think that while there is not a 1:1 between all versions of mafia and italiano is new to this format, i feel in particular 91 feels a bit wifomy having 204 to read now.
that being said, i could see pii as scum despite this, though without more to judge i don't think i'm sold entirely on the idea. it's possible that italiano was frustrated, if they are scum with pii, that their partner has been inactive thus far and finds it easier to bus them at this point.
pii's posts were nondescript to me and i don't feel that i can say much more on the slot until someone replaces into it and becomes active.
VOTE: ItalianoVD
I would say newbiescum with an AFKing partner would eagerly await their new incoming teammate-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
In post 254, GuiltyLion wrote:72offsuit, there's a bunch of stuff I want to work with in your posts but this is a quick pop in during lunch break so I don't have time to do it justice yet, I'll be back with more #content over the next few hours.In post 256, GuiltyLion wrote:
also DoctorPepper in addendum to this, I'd like an update on your read on 72offsuit. You were scumreading him earlier, I gave some reasons as to why I think he might be scum, I find it strange that now you pivot to Walter and toss some suspicion at me instead of potentially working with me on 72offsuit.In post 252, GuiltyLion wrote:
I don't vote people based on whether they're active or inactive, I vote them based on how likely I think they are to be scum. Why is Walter a good vote?In post 243, DoctorPepper wrote:GL and Walter voting on an inactive slot does not bode well with me considering that there are so many active slots in the game
What's the point in these bite-size posts and the overly-explaininy, "this is just a quick pop in"? Just address my post in full.-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
1. Self-meta'ing, see bolded above. This is bad.In post 255, GuiltyLion wrote:
I'll start with this thoughIn post 227, 72offsuit wrote:Your townread of Uno is extremely lame and feels disingenuous. Im paraphrasing here, but It seems to me to boil down to:
"His response did not particularly feel scummy" - this is a garbage reason to town read someone. This is a NAI thing, AT BEST.
"Reasoning for voting IVD was earnest", is also pretty lame.
that post was explaining my Uno townreadat the time that I gave it. There's been a bunch more in Unowen's posts since that I've also found town-indicative, but I admittedly didn't go through a ton of effort to explain it at the time or afterwards, because I knew I wanted to do another review of the entire game so far and because I still don't think it actually helps town all that much to wax poetic at length about why you think people are town. I generally think it's far more useful to dig into reasons for scumreads than townreads, because scumreads are the ones that scum can't fake. It's way easier to fake a townread on a town slot, and franklyif I were scum and I was townreading a town!UNOwen I can promise you I'd be able to write a pretty convincing sounding case if I needed to.
Why do you say it's "disingenuous"? and more importantly, do you scumread UNOwen? Or are you just trying to push back on my intentions?
as long as you don't think Owen and I are literally scum together, then either:
-I'm scum and UNOwen is town and we can at least both agree UNOwen is town and off the table for a lynch today (which I think is useful)
-I'm town and UNOwen is town, in which case arguing about my reasons for townreading UNOwen just muddies the waters around both of our slots for no gain to town
-I'm town and UNOwen is scum, in which case I would say the more important thing for you to be doing here iscasingUNOwen and making an effort to convince me I'm wrong, rather than saying my townread is "lame".
So if you want to suss me out as for why I have that read, feel free, but if you are townreading UNOwen yourself then I'd like to keep that mutual townread established and centered as I think that's important, and if you don't actually think UNOwen is town then I would expect more from you in terms of casing and pushing him, instead of picking a fight with me.
2. Yes, I scumread UNO and I;ve said as much. Why are you asking this? It just sounds like you are trying to shade me here.
3. I said it feels disingenuous because thats how I felt reading the post.
4. OK, the second bolded part is an excellent point and actually feels town +++.
It requires you to elaborate on your TR of him though.
The problem is I feel this is the sort of thing thats better to do post a flip (i.e on day 2). Not trying to put words in your mouth, but what it sounds like to me is that you are intentionally or perhaps not (along with your de-railing of the thread direction, whether it be in !townGLgood-faith or with !GLscum ill-will, with your pii+72 likely scum post), but it still being the end-product: proprosing a day 1 solve, which is nigh impossible.-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
You are self-justifying, which again, noone asked for, which is scummy.In post 259, GuiltyLion wrote:
how is it "over-explainy", what? all I was saying is that I've read your 234 and I know I want to respond to it, but I don't have time yet.In post 257, 72offsuit wrote:What's the point in these bite-size posts and the overly-explaininy, "this is just a quick pop in"? Just address my post in full.-
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
I never said it was unclear or had no intention. It just feels like a classic scum move to just spin BS as you go by picking random points in a post, rather than deal with the whole post of mine, in its entirely, in context.