[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 14032611 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Open 899 - The Pizza Kids Coalition [Game Over] - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #20 (isolation #1) » Sun Dec 31, 2023 9:38 pm
Postby Klick »
In post 11, DragonEater70 wrote:
Confession: the other day I had the opportunity to eat pizza and I gave it up for a chicken wrap, because I was tired of pizza.
Yes, I'm a heretic. VOTE: Dragon
Also, HEAL: Klick in the hopes he's town again and we just lick this game in 20 pages.
In post 31, DragonEater70 wrote:
To clarify I faked an SR of Klick ehen I had no read on him at all
Because I picked up on this and wanted to decide whether you were doing it because of that reason, or because you were scum unsure of how to interact with me not responding to you
Was it klick/dragoneater that pinged you as a potential distance as well, or more of a general fear?
Distancing? DragonEater ended our earlier exchange with a townread on me, and my stated read on DragonEater is ambiguous atm. I don't see how you come out of it thinking it looks like distancing.
say "this is more likely to come from town than scum" in the past, and immediately follow it with "I think this posting is more likely to come from town than scum" (not saying this is alignment indicative, just find it funny). As a note, yeah that's an early game read, not a lategame read.
Also Klick can you help me out here? I think you should understand why I would consider a fast-paced, TvT-heavy game start to be superior to a slow and "wow everyone is so towny" game start, considering how well our last TvT-heavy game went. And this game I feel everyone is just TRing other people and trying not to step on anybody's toes (except me, Kyo, and you to a degree). Which makes it very hard to read people.
So if you can help me push this game into TvT (or even TvS) territory that'd help.
Pedit: to me, making it out like that philosophy should dictate my every thought is a "misrep" of my intentions, so that's what I call it.
Also, what do you make of DV's post being the way it is?
You've got to work with the playerlist you've got. This just isn't a group of people that are going to be at each other's throats right from the start. I'm satisfied with the slow game at the minute. It also works out with my IRL, with work starting back up.
Besides, the game is nearly won anyway even without that
Post
Post #119 (isolation #10) » Tue Jan 02, 2024 7:37 am
Postby Klick »
In post 95, DragonEater70 wrote:
Though tbh Ydra could in theory be scum so I urge you all not to blindly sheep me before we do some more solving and stuff
Post
Post #123 (isolation #12) » Tue Jan 02, 2024 7:46 am
Postby Klick »
In post 100, DeasVail wrote:
Read on implosion is very much still in progress but there are some early things concerning me, which I will talk more on later.
I can’t pinpoint exactly what it is that I’m concerned about with Dragon but I can’t identify a strong reason to townread him, and it feels like play that could be consistent with scum trying to be in a town core. (Not that this is a logical reason for scum-reading, but it forms part of my thoughts)
Post
Post #127 (isolation #13) » Tue Jan 02, 2024 8:10 am
Postby Klick »
Yes and no
I have stopped responding atm mostly because I'm doing evening with the kids
But also I think answering your current questions would impede on my process and would prefer to play it out a bit longer while I get a more confident read on the game state
@ the three of you: I'm less interested in discussing everyone else, and more interested in discussing why this group is pure. We can work out an ideal fifth shortly, but I want to iron out confidence in this as a group first. I feel not certain, but fairly confident that this group is pure, and I think discussing the details of that is the best use of our thread space.
(but not right now because I'm getting ready for work)
Post
Post #167 (isolation #17) » Wed Jan 03, 2024 9:19 pm
Postby Klick »
In post 164, DragonEater70 wrote:
I will be answering things addressed to me later on today, but first I want to express a general complaint. This is addressed at everyone:
I've given this game a 36 hour break, and I come back to maybe a single page worth of posts, more than half of which is people saying stuff into the air (most of which if we ignore implo's posts which I haven't fully read yet, is either stating TR's or asking about TR's) and not really moving the game along. THIS is what I was getting at as being anti-town earlier, NOT "having more townreads than scumreads".
I do not like this game state at all. Elements asked me who would I think I'm wrong about if my coalition fails, and currently I have NO IDEA because none of my reads are sufficiently evolved. How can I read anyone with no ACTION? I can't, and I bet you can't either.
What I want is a dynamic gamestate, like in this game or this second game or this other game (I chose those because they had a very strong sense of "something is actually happening" in the first three pages, and rhe conversationg goes somewhere). But instead there's just people townreading each other with almost no analysis and not even pushing who they think is scum, as scum.
You might think I'm just whining here, but what I actually want is to ask you people to bring this game to life and case people (idc for which alignment you case them) and hurt/heal people and react to stuff happening so we have a dynamic game and not just a pile of reads and questions about reads.
This game is super readable
I think what I want will give you what you want anyway
Post
Post #170 (isolation #19) » Wed Jan 03, 2024 9:23 pm
Postby Klick »
The reason you're not getting super dynamic here Dragon is because you've got players like DV and implosion as dominant players who just aren't going to be playing like that due to several factors fundamental to them
In post 170, Klick wrote:
The reason you're not getting super dynamic here Dragon is because you've got players like DV and implosion as dominant players who just aren't going to be playing like that due to several factors fundamental to them
I don’t know what these fundamental factors are, even for me!
Laziness?
Methodical, less time to devote, has a comfortable approach to the game that takes things slower
atm probably town
the last time i played scum i was miserable but i was also burned out horribly
That's the vibe I had
The thing that is currently selling me on you being town is that you feel like you want to be here and are enjoying solving in a way that you wouldn't be expressing if you were scum
And I'm trying to decide whether that's a valid reason to think you're town here
I'm leaning yes?
i do think Ydrasse is being somewhat consistently townish.
I wish T3 would post more.
When I skimmed the Elements-town reasoning earlier it felt too gimmicky to be reliable but it's been a while since I paid it attention. I don't feel strongly on Elements either way atm.
I'll have quite a lot of time to sit and play this evening, and I can have a better look then
Post
Post #233 (isolation #30) » Fri Jan 05, 2024 6:49 am
Postby Klick »
In post 231, Ydrasse wrote:
off the top of my head i squinted a bit at his reason for calling me town because it felt like a potentially convenient read to have or i guess easy to make? “feels like you want to be here” is hard to rate for each person
I think this is valid and that's why I want to discuss it in more detail
I'd definitely put it closer to the 'gut' category than the 'fleshed out logic' category
Post
Post #235 (isolation #31) » Fri Jan 05, 2024 6:54 am
Postby Klick »
So I'm not starting with much of a read at all on Elements. Up to this point I've mostly been reading with the lens of {town} vs. {???} and nothing Elements has done has obviously put them in the first bracket. I'll see if I can squeeze anything out of the slip argument that seems to be popular, but I didn't think much of it earlier.
Post
Post #236 (isolation #32) » Fri Jan 05, 2024 6:56 am
Postby Klick »
In post 234, Ydrasse wrote:
yes and like i know that is often how you play it’s just something that sounds good and is correct but doesn’t require a lot to say
even if i like that method of reading people i also like the Meat and Potatoes of content lol
I like to avoid the meat and potatoes until I feel like I have something worthwhile enough to say as an argument, which isn't very often
there's also a part of me that wants to call this post like, really hard town for being the kind of thing scum would be very unlikely to genuinely think (because they have a scumbuddy they're interacting with/are probably more self-conscious about stuff)
and also extremely unlikely to come up with the idea of faking
I'm going to assume this sums up most people's basic reasoning for declaring Elements!town
I just... am not that compelled? The italics is what I'm not that convinced by. I agree that it splits Elements' states into {town telling the truth} and {scum faking}. But I don't really read Elements as the type of scum player who never makes post 62 for the hell of it.
What I do believe about the situation is that Elements at least has a level of awareness high enough to know that posting 62 will make people think about this kind of thing. The scum intent is obvious, but if Elements is town, I still think Elements wrote this with some amount of intent to get a reaction.
I don't feel that comfortable making an alignment judgement on the logic in this post, because I feel like it could go either way.
there's also a part of me that wants to call this post like, really hard town for being the kind of thing scum would be very unlikely to genuinely think (because they have a scumbuddy they're interacting with/are probably more self-conscious about stuff) and also extremely unlikely to come up with the idea of faking
The only read on me I like so far
@Elements: I suppose it's worth asking if what I wrote above is true and you had some amount of conscious awareness that posting 62 would get people talking about townslips?
Post
Post #244 (isolation #37) » Fri Jan 05, 2024 7:20 am
Postby Klick »
So the idea behind it is sort of a lack of attempted positioning?
What I want to deduce is how Elements!scum would likely approach the start of this game
Because my initial assumption is that it's not really out of Elements' range to not care that much about early positioning
But that could be wrong
Post
Post #246 (isolation #38) » Fri Jan 05, 2024 7:24 am
Postby Klick »
I think if her reads are fake the intent is to mimic authenticity
And to see if that has merit as an idea we just need to see if that's what Elements tends to aim for when she's scum
Post
Post #253 (isolation #43) » Fri Jan 05, 2024 7:40 am
Postby Klick »
I'm satisfied that this is about what I'd expect from scum!Elements in terms of intended content and actual content
I'm now going to look back at town games and try to remember why Elements is usually a really free townread when town
there's also a part of me that wants to call this post like, really hard town for being the kind of thing scum would be very unlikely to genuinely think (because they have a scumbuddy they're interacting with/are probably more self-conscious about stuff) and also extremely unlikely to come up with the idea of faking
The only read on me I like so far
@Elements: I suppose it's worth asking if what I wrote above is true and you had some amount of conscious awareness that posting 62 would get people talking about townslips?
I went into this game from a perspective of thinking it would be unlikely we'd get a coalition win so if I wasn't in the coalition that puts me in a position to see a 1/5 and a 1/2 or a 2/5 which I think benefits town to solve. I was thinking of asking not to be in the coalition at that point I think? but then realised it was a 9p setup so that whole line of thinking was invalid.
I think my confusion came from the 7p wilson that was/is in signups
I think this is fair and probably true
But I now also think that this is a confusion that you could have as scum too
Particularly with renewed context of 'you aren't tryharding too much early on as scum' I could see you thinking this is 7p for the first few posts before you got engaged
Elements in Mini Normal 2305 wrote:My day one often gets read as being forced or overcompensating or generally not natural, but most of the time it's just me saying whatever comes into my head without thinking before posting
me in same game wrote:I find it interesting that Elements describes her D1 as fairly NAI because I've found her very readable from early on in the last few games I've read with her in them. From what I can remember there's a noticeable self-consciousness and dip in enthusiasm/energy when she's scum. Here she just wants to play and get things going and it feels very motivated by wanting to make solvable content
I was scum in this quote but I was describing true thoughts on Elements' play
Tbh I think this reasoning is probably outdated. Elements seems lower energy in more recent games and that probably has little to do with alignment and more to do with outside factors.
Either way I don't really townread Elements atm and that's as solid as that read gets at this point in time. I think assuming scum was probably misguided as well though. Flat null.
Post
Post #260 (isolation #46) » Fri Jan 05, 2024 8:18 am
Postby Klick »
In post 258, Elements wrote:
There's not really much I can say against your read tbh
I could very easily be playing like this had I rolled red, I just happen to be town this time
This could be faked, but considering her being uncomfortable with me in the coalition earlier I feel it's a weird approach for scum to just say that and I also just vibed with this because I believe that Elements would think that I feel similar.
As a more general succinct response to this reasoning, now that I've looked at Elements' gameplay in excruciating detail: I think you're assuming a lot more effort out of scum!Elements here than scum!Elements would actually have.
In post 102, DragonEater70 wrote:
As for my read on Klick, he feels like he's not trying to be TR'd at all (unless he is playing a game of "let's pocket Dragon and get null'd by everybody else", which if it is the case then I wish him luck with that since idk how far it will get him), and I think that makes him pretty towny.
who do you think is trying to do that then?
he hasn’t posted a lot so i struggle to see how someone can very comfortably make that call i guess. there’s a part of me that thinks he could be playing a clever wolf game based on how he treated you by like… kind of uno carding you. i don’t know how likely this is but i felt it was possible, and if he was doing something like that he’s now got someone in his court without much loss. with what looks like recent history it makes sense to me that he might want to capitalize on that when presented with the chance, etc
implo is trying very hard to be TR'd.
So… this was actually my exact thought.
I think I might have been wrong on my read of you
In post 132, DeasVail wrote:
On Ydra: I liked that her read on me was just vibes. It also made sense to me because I think my play has been mostly pretty boring and easily could provoke the thought of “this is where I think scum would be”.
In post 26, Appearance wrote:
btw, i just realised my browser messes up the font that prism uses for the vcs
Just checking: Is the latest VC readable for everyone?
Most mobile browsers render a different font than the one I use, which is fine by me, but if the VC is mangled or difficult to parse, let me know and I'll switch it up.
It’s been fine for me!
Also miscellaneous thoughts:
Klick moved up in my reads a bit because of him saying that he’d been ambiguous about his read on Dragon, at a time when I think he had only really expressed a scumread there. I think this is more likely from town because scum are more likely to be hyper-aware of the “positions” they are taking on people while town are more likely to believe that because they
felt
ambiguous about someone it would come across in their posts.
On implosion, there are specific ways in which I feel he has tried to look town, but I want to give implosion a chance to be able to properly engage with the game (and also see whether the things concerning me continue) before going all in on that.
When I go through my townreads (which I have too many of, I know), the one that least holds up to scrutiny at the moment is T3. I was doubting Appearance for a while but looking back I feel like the backtracking by saying that maybe Klick/Dragon didn’t look like distancing was more likely consistent with townie lack of confidence. Still not sure though, because the T3 read in particular doesn’t feel proactive, as if they’re taking the fact that T3 will be in the coalition as a given and not questioning it, but again… could be town struggling with confidence in their reads.
This string of posts is when my read on DV shifted from 'potentially scum' to 'probably town'
Post
Post #280 (isolation #56) » Fri Jan 05, 2024 9:11 am
Postby Klick »
For some background context: DV and I are rather good friends. We've played probably over a dozen games of Survivor together. We've met up IRL. Probably my best MS friend that I'm not married to. We don't keep up super often because I don't really know how to do that, but I'd like to say I know DV rather well.
I don't really have that much Mafia experience with DV though. If I get to an accurate townread on DV, it's likely going to be through the avenue of 'I believe DV genuinely believes what he's saying'.
And that's sort of the vibe I get from the above three posts I think? Particularly the last one. I feel like I'm getting genuine DV consideration.
I'll look through this later and see if it gives any good insight into how to properly read DV. I seem to remember having thoughts on the difference between town and scum DV while this game was going on, but I'd need a serious refresher