Micro 488: Forest Fire - Endgame
-
-
Gentlemen Bastards
-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
In post 39, Quilford wrote:haha empipoo dw I am supes town
VOTE: sangres
nacho nacho na-cho!
nacho nacho na-cho!
You seem a bit awkward though (including in this post). :/ What gives?
(I've been drinking a bit so prepare for increasingly incoherent posts.)-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
My fucking phone died
In post 51, Quilford wrote:$20 says regfan and empire drew scum AGAIN
thinking i could be scum at this poiint is scummy
also sangres probably town question mark-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
Was waiting for more content to occur to get reads before posting but this games extremely slow and I'm impatient at the moment. This is just a normal scumhunting setup, there are some other mechanics at play (Tree stump, the manner scum have their night kill ect.) but none of that changes how this early game plays out, time for more people to pop in here and state some reads and thoughts.
I didn't like Quilfords early few posts (Was the one to bring it up to Empire initially), they felt very awkward but I don't agree with Empire at all about Quilfords Post 51 where he considers us being scum, I'm reading that as more of a town-tell than a scum-tell here.Also not seeing Empires town read on Yurikoat allso he'll have to explain that one to me when he's awake and sober. Similarly not seeing his Sangres town read, hoping it's based on more than just him liking the manner she brought up meta-checks earlier because that read as extremely weak and something easily fakeable to me.
Sangres other than wanting to speak with Empire was there a particular reason you wanted to know who made Post 4 of ours?
About the only town read I'm semi-confident in at this point is Bork, like his "There's a few things I'm monitoring but don't want to butt in on" in Post 38 mirrors what I was doing at the time, also like his recent questioning with Quilford, comes across as him genuinely attempt to get a read there.
Unvote, Vote: Pie
Quilford vote still isn't bad but I'm liking this slightly more at the moment, Pies reaction towards Muffin in Post 13 / Post 17 felt over-the-top forced.-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
In post 64, Gold Saucer wrote:After #55 I see #46 as a "I don't know how to scumhunt without flips" worry. I'm inclined to agree.
I don't see how that'd make scumhunting more difficult or harder for her to do especially in an early game position like this where there wouldn't be any flips normally. Also it's not as if flips are hidden it's just a case of lynched town can still post which shouldn't impact scumhunting again? So yeah, I don't see her "worries" as genuine at all. I'm going to be p disappointing if that's what Empire is reading as town here.-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
Empire popped in, his town read on Yuriko is dead - It was based around him thinking the "how do I get reads you people are weird" being about peoples play rather than the setup, he agrees that it being about the setup isn't genuine/doesn't make sense. Still not sold on his Sangres town read (Though I'm starting to see it re; Post 75) but he's agreeing p strongly on Bork being town which is nice.
He also says I'm a turdman that can't read his trolling and his comment on Quilfords post being scummy wasn't serious (The initial vote on Quilford was though). I read it as town-ish because I can imagine that being something Town!Quilford would contemplate (especially with by absence from the thread despite being online elsewhere at the time, something he was aware of) but it's p weak reasoning and I still dislike his earlier posts.
In post 74, Gold Saucer wrote:This kinda implies you think she's scummy. Do you?
Yes, am leaning that way, it's weakened by the fact that she is ESL though (which is generally something I have trouble reading). There's slightly more to this but I don't want to go into it right now; remind me if I forget to bring it up later because Empire things it's p important.
In post 72, sangres wrote:My question about who made the post had nothing at all to do with wanting to speak with Empire.
What did the fact that Empire made that post tell you and how would it have changed if I were the one that made the post?-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
I'll take this one. My initial interpretation suggested to me that Yuriko is town because, beneath the surface, she is trying to get reads but finds the conversations/early game fuckery impenetrable and is voicing her frustration about it in the thread.-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
In post 82, sangres wrote:I thought the sentiment sounded a little forced coming from Empire, but could be that he was just that keyed up about the game. Which was *sort of* confirmed by his answer to my questions. It didn't have some of the tone I remember from his rvs play in the space game, though.
FWIW, I think that my play once Day 1 actually started is a lot closer to Mafia in Space than you're thinking (minus the lighthearted banter, probably due to the side effects of drawing a town PM in this particular game vs. that one). Also, Regfan thinks that we're obvtown already so you should just sheep him, he's good at mafia you know?
In post 84, Gold Saucer wrote:Hi guys! I just got back home and am super duper tres tired. If I get some grading done and wake up, I'll post something. Otherwise, tomorrow. But Bork's got this, so.
Hey Tammy, bork's inexplicably already more obvtown than you. How does this make youfeel?-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
Well, ffery, for one thing the quality of this roster is way higher. Also, you (part of the Trinity of Empire readers) and Tammy (pretty accurate at reading me) are here and I don't expect you two to have any problems reading me as town if you're both town like I think you are so that gives me the license to roam free and uninhibited.
Quilford, any thoughts on non-my slot players?-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
I'm now very much seeing the Sangres town read of Empires, Ffyers Post 75, Post 86 and especially Post 93 all read very town and I liked the explanation behind the "Who posted that" question in Post 82, can follow the reasoning behind it. Would like to see some Nacho analysis in this thread soon though. Our town read on Bork has gotten stronger too and I'm leaning town on Rancid (I think Empire agrees with this too?) albeit that's a fairly weak read at this point.
Also I forgot to mention it before but neither of us liked Mollas Post 41 nor the fact that he's active elsewhere but here. Similarly Pie has been online a lot since our vote on him and the lack of in-thread reaction is making me feel more comfortable with our vote.
@Quilford -You would have known I'd be online via seeing my post (which you responded to) in the Melbourne thread. Anyway while I agree with your reads in Post 96 I find it alone p underwhelming, would like to see more from you; what's your read on Yuriko/Pie/Molla so far?
@Muffin -I like that your reads are mirroring mine so far (Pie/Yuriko scum, Bork town) would like to know what specifically of Yuriko thatyouare/were reading as scum at the time of your post though, also would love your read on Quilford with reasoning attached please.
@Yuriko -I'm mostly interested in your reads on players (So far everyone single one of your posts has been about the setup/game and not about a read on a player, that needs to change); Who do you think is mafia, who do you think is town and why? With all that said I do want you to explain the disconnect in your most recent post; if you accept the fact that lynched town players continue to have a voice and that there will be less nightkills (Both really good things for town) why do you think it's biased towards the mafia? Not following that conclusion at all.-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
@Quilford -The voting phase had been going for quite some time when I made that post over there. I don't think Yukiro is that much of a 'newb', she's played several games and one of them I skimmed she won ridiculously easily as scum so I don't think her setup stuff is a town-tell at all.
@Pie -The quoted bit below reads like utter bullshit - We haven't "pushed" you at all, I've merely voted you saying that your posts read over-the-top (Something that both Ffyer and Muffin have agreed with) and mentioned that I dislike you being online but taking an age to get in here for content (Which did occur). The whole "It's an awful push, they're scum!" reads as an attempt to de-credit and OMGUS and the attack on Quilford for being "Waffly" while doing the same thing with your Muffin read doesn't add up at all, also dislike your lack of comment on Bork given he's the largest poster here. So here's your chance to convince me I'm wrong at the moment; a) What about our 'push' is bad, b) What's your read on Bork and c) How does your Muffin read differ from Quilfords?
In post 106, pieguyn wrote:GB is scum,or at the very least their push on me is one of the most awful things I think I've ever seen.-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
Huh, I swear the game was going last night.
Here; http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=39723-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
In post 112, pieguyn wrote:the bork town read jumped out at me. taking a laid-back/observing approach is relatively easy to fake as scum. and "genuinely attempting to get a read" is completely unsubstantiated (I'm interested in what, specifically, made you think this). in general, I feel most of the positions in 63 were ass-backwards; I think sangres is likely town and don't really see how he's seeing bork's posts (which I think have been easy to fake for the most part) as more town.
Waiting for conversations to play out naturally in the manner Bork was to get reads makes sense as town (It's what I was doing at the time), you're able to see how peoples conversations play out and then assess their motivations afterwards whereas scum are more incentive into pushing themselves into a conversation to a) Seem contributive while really not doing much or b) Manipulate the conversation. I liked his line of questioning towards Quilford - the questions had a legitimate thought process and reason behind it, I've since really liked the way he has interacted both with Ffyer and ourselves and while I strongly disagree with his Yuriko town reasoning I think him pushing people to comment on it reads town. And not to mention I DO have Sangres as town, I just didn't at THAT point. Also Empire says your town reasoning on Sangres is ridiculously superficial (The fact that your 'strong' town read is based on page 1 rather than latter pages is proof of that) + they weren't "pushing" us, merely asking a question (This is you changing the definition of pushing again).
In post 112, pieguyn wrote:this is one of the most lol things I've seen and I don't believe that a player of your calibre would consider this a cogent argument. consider this. was I actually posting in any other games in the time I was on this site? I was periodically browsing the site, but I was busy and it takes a lot more time effort to sit down and read/digest a game than it does to periodically browse the forums and make occasional posts here and there. the fact that I hadn't even formed any reads yet after game start adds to this (although strictly speaking I had the weak town read on ffery since her pregame posts, but, really); you were expecting me to come in here, with no reads, and do ... what, exactly?
Actively lurking and avoiding a thread is a scum-tell and scum have a lot of reason to do so in a playerlist like this where scum are going to have severe difficulty a) Getting people to misread them and b) Pushing through mslynches but again continue to pretend that a) We were "hard pushing you" (Which is not something we were doing at all and b) Voted you for being online elsewhere (Not why we voted you).
In post 112, pieguyn wrote:it is also noted that your two primary scum reads entirely come down to "forced posts" and "being active elsewhere but not posting here" - and when you did have a play-based scum read, you dropped it immediately (and looking back at it again it was based mostly on forced posts). do you currently have any scum reads based on play?
Forced / Genuine posting is p standard terminology for when you find a post scummy/townish so you attempting to belittle our scum reads because they're based on "Forced posting" especially in the early game is idiotic and if you were reading our posts you'd notice that I have a scum read on Yuriko and that it's not really a scum-read on Molla but more of a "I find his posts/play underwhelming and am keeping an eye there" read.
In post 112, pieguyn wrote:voting me is pretty fucking obviously a push. this is even more so the case when you have had said vote on me for the entire game and have continually laid out additional reasons for me being scum over the course of the game. so, how is that not constituted a "push"?
this is a semantic argument at best and disingenuous at worst.
Empire says this is one of the worst things he has ever seen and I think I agree, if you were reading the game you'd have noticed our vote wasn't initially on you and was rather on Quilford (We disliked his early posts and wanted to get a reaction out of him, the vote on him a mix between a pressure-vote and a scum-read) the same was the case on our vote on you. It wasn't a "everyone lynch Pie, he's scum, we're positive!" vote at all, it was a vote saying "I feel more comfortable being here" and an added "I feel better about the vote knowing he's been online but avoided this". So you making out our vote was a "push" is ridiculously scummy, like insanely scummy - it shows you haven't read the thread properly and rather are just pushing back on us.-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
In post 106, pieguyn wrote:GB is scum,or at the very least their push on me is one of the most awful things I think I've ever seen.I haven't been fond of their other posts, either. more elaboration on this incoming.In post 112, pieguyn wrote:voting me is pretty fucking obviously a push. this is even more so the case when you have had said vote on me for the entire game and have continually laid out additional reasons for me being scum over the course of the game. so, how is that not constituted a "push"?
Your post above our 'push' above, our comments re; you below. You're scum, you can hang now.
In post 63, Gentlemen Bastards wrote:Unvote, Vote: Pie
Quilford vote still isn't bad butI'm liking this slightly more at the moment, Pies reaction towards Muffin in Post 13 / Post 17 felt over-the-top forced.
In post 103, Gentlemen Bastards wrote:Also I forgot to mention it before but neither of us liked Mollas Post 41 nor the fact that he's active elsewhere but here.Similarly Pie has been online a lot since our vote on him and the lack of in-thread reaction is making me feel more comfortable with our vote.-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
In post 123, pieguyn wrote:the strongest point (and what makes me pretty sure they're scum here) is them saying "lol, ur posting on site but not posting here" without actually thinking about it (and the accompanied lack of any other scum read based on anything play-related). I think they're too smart for that. it felt more like an easy throwaway reason they could pull up to add to the scum read on me.
Continue to blatantly lie, it's fun to point out how glaringly obvious you are now. Heck anyone looking at Post 122 at this point will see you've massively you've changed what our 'push'/vote/comment on you was. Not to mention we never voted you for being online (Which you're trying to make out is the case) nor do we have 'no scum reads elsewhere', it's p easy to see that I've got one on Yuriko and initially had one on Quilford (His recent tone reads town though).-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
You're ignoring us.
But no, I'm not particularly interested in a huge amount of back and forth walls (I've made that mistake once before and people ruled it out as TvT leading towards people giving scum the win when I was dead despite me being right) so I'll just summarise why Pies scum in one post here, Empire can add to it later.
1. She's misrepped what our push on her was, I've quoted in Post 122 but essentially I moved our vote from Quilford->Pie in Post 63 because I wasn't as comfortable on Quilford anymore and because I found Pies reaction to Muffins posts as forced, then stated I was more comfortable with my vote in Post 103 because I'd seen her online a lot without popping in, she's come straight in swinging calling our push "the worst thing she's seen" and that we were scum in Post 106 and then in Post 112 stated that we've had our vote on her the whole game (If she was reading the game she'd have noticed us vote Quilford, get a reaction and then move to her) and that we'd 'continuously laid out additional reasons for her being scum' when we'd mentioned her a total of two times. So essentially she's had a huge scum-overaction towards our vote on her and then proceeded to misrep all of our prior posts trying to make it seem like we've got no reads elsewhere (Already gone into two town reads I'm p confident on, two that I've touched on and a scum read on Yuriko) and that we've been 'non-stop' pushing her which wasn't the case.
2. Her town read on Ffyer is ridiculously superficial in Post 106 and actually ignores what really has happened, the explanation of the town read is that she doesn't see Ffyer 'pushing Empire' as scum (This never happened, she asked who made the first post of the game, that's not even remotely close to a push) and then in Post 123 claimed the town read on Ffyer is based on her confidence (She's shown no confidence in stating a read on us or really anyone as of yet, her Post 93 if anything is her being cautious not confident). The fact that her town read on Ffyer is based of these things rather than actual town posts of Ffyer is a p large scum-tell.
Can probably go into a few more points (Specifically her read on Muffin v her stating that Quilford is scummy for being fenesitty ect.) but the above two posts are what I'd consider the stronger scum-tells that she's dropped and I'd rather people focus on those for now - if you want me to elaborate on anything feel free to ask.-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
In post 132, pieguyn wrote:COME OUT AND PLAY, REGFAN You don't get to write a bunch of walls and then go "herp derp, wall wars are anti-town". I, on the other hand, love wall wars, so good fucking luck pushing any more blatantly false arguments against me here.
More than happy to keep discussing this just not in a quote wall format (No one reads those and it'll just spam this up people ending up ignoring most of the arguments) - I'll respond to your more most recent post when my poker game ends though the crux of why I think you're scum is in Post 130.-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
RE; Post 131
1) Again the "Bork is waiting back for certain conversations to end before entering" wasn't a "Oh that means he's 100% town" tell (You'd notice this when I stated the town read on him in Post 63 was only a semi-confident one) and that wasn't the entire basis of it.
2) I've played enough mafia to know that a player that's avoiding a thread has a better than random chance of being mafia (Unless they've got a weird preference for scum) so yes, I consider actively being on the site but not posting a scum-tell, is it a strong one, depends on the context, was it a strong one in this case? No. Was it something that made me feel slightly better about my vote on you? Yes. Was it a or my reason to vote you alone? No. It's not a difficult thing to understand.
3) Lets not beat around the bush with the "Forced is inherently bullshit" argument, I find/found your reaction to Muffin as forced, you say you were "joking/mucking around and it was purely playstyle" but I find those type of posts more likely to come from scum that feel awkward or unsure what to post or react to someone calling them mafia (Jokingly or seriously so). Again by no means was I even remotely confident that made you scum, it was a ridiculously weak scum read, what's strengthened it tenfold is you misrepresenting everything that we've done and what our "push" on you consists of after the vote.
4) You're pushing saying "You've got little to no scum-reads based off in-play stuff" and guess what? We've seen very little of Soft, Molla (Who I've explained I found his initial post underwhelming, lacked a certain thing or two I was expecting in it, we think we can read him as the day pans out), Yuriko (Who I disliked her initial posts for in-thread reasons - it's a lot of conversation and discussion on the setup and not reads from here while her concerns of the setup don't add up either) and yourself at that point of the thread - what "strong" scum reads would it be 'reasonable' to have there?
5) There's a pretty large difference between reaction-testing, pressure voting, questioning and pushing someone for a lynch. The earlier three are done to get a stronger read on someone the latter is done to get a scum read lynched, it's pretty obvious at that point that we weren't pushing you for a lynch at all so you coming in and saying "their push is awful" "they've been continously pushing me" based on two,two, I'll repeat it againtwocomments about you doesn't add up at all. And if it's based on the "Way we're pushing you" a) Both Ffyer and Muffin mentioned your initial posts reading as forced in theexactsame manner we did and b) You've seen me mention peoples activity elewhere while avoiding the thread impact on my reads in other games before.-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
In post 135, Quilford wrote:HMMMmmafdmfa okay maybe reg vs pie is town on town.
DIE.-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
RE; Post 139
1) I refuse to consider for a second that you genuine believe that "pushing" is a) Asking someone which hydra head made a specific post (Which is what you're considering Ffyers interaction with Empire is and then calling her a strong town read based on it which is nonsensical) and b) Voting someone in the early game where it's ridiciulously obvious it's not an attempt to lynch them, you've played enough mafia to know that's not a push.
2) The whole "Why would I play this way as scum / Why would I lie as scum" is fairly easily explainable; scum lie, scum make up reasons to suspect people, scum bullshit reads and reasoning (Tammy will hate this but my 'clearance' of BBT in our last game is a key example of this), stating that our read/'push' is 'awful/scum' works in the regard that you're instantly going about to de-credit us since you know it's unlikely for you to be able to manipulate us and dodge the lynch D1 that method so you're better of instead attempting to ML us or have it that no one will listen to us (And Empire did point out that you'd be 90% likely to push us back as scum). The fact that you're continuously pointing to the "He pushed me via being online elsewhere" when that's not really what happened or "you don't have any scum reads based on in-thread stuff" which again is wrong points to that too.-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
RE; Post 145
Post #130 1)- I'd consider our vote on you and Quilord very similar, I don't really think we "pushed" you any stronger than him at all.
Post #130 2) & Post #136 2)- There's no way I can know exactly why you're not posting in the thread, none at all, had you popped in with a "busy today, will get to this tonight" I'd have had no issue at all, it was the fact that Empire stated when he checked the site earlier in the game phase he saw you online when I made my vote I saw you online and saw you online for quite some time afterwards that I find/found scummy - does you not having posted in that time make you confirmed scum, no, but it does make me feel more comfortable about my vote on you even if only marginally so again the fact that you're continuing to push the "this logic does not make sense" is idiotic, you've seen first hand several scum players lurk intentionally (Heck I did it at points in WF).
Post #136 4)- I have a very strong town read on both Sangres and Borkhydra - both of their lines of prodding, their interaction and reads on each other and other players read town. I can elaborate on both in more detail if needed but suffice to say that I haven't had a single qualm that's unexplained by either (I did dislike Ffyers initail question to Empire but her reasoning behind it squashed that). We're both reading Quilfords tone to match his town one, it's not a rock solid town read and we'd like to see more content and reads from him but I don't have a scum read on him. I've liked most of Muffins reads and thoughts so far, again it's not a rock solid town read but I do lean towards him being town and know that Empire does too. So yes, we think scum are more likely in the lesser posters which makes 'finding scum-tells' difficult, the few posts they (You/Molla/Yuki) had at the point we weren't fond of either and you're ignoring what I really scum-read about Yuikis posts it's largely two things, a) The fact that not a single post of hers so far has had anything scumhunting and read related and she's not a 'noob' like some people here seem to believe and b) I'm not following the thought process behind some of her setup paranoia, her conclusions don't match her statements which I need explained, I'm willing to admit some of this may be down to the fact that she's ESL but either way I'll wait for her posts to judge better at this point.
Post #144 1)- Her asking who made that post is hardly her pushing on our slot and is not something that's even remotely unfakebale not to mention the comment you're stating that makes you more confident they're town (Ffyer agreeing with the scum reads on you) would have lots of scum motivation if they're scum? They see two players state a scum-read on you and can safely jump on board, it's not a town-tell at all and the fact it's the basis of your town read on them is what reads really fake, there are several MUCH townier posts of theirs for instance Ffyers comment re; Bork tricking her here in Post 75 or her wanting to be sure on her read on us in Post 93. There's a lot of posts from Bork similarly that I'd expect you to be town reading or commenting on but you're not.
I'll leave #Post 144 2) for it's own post.-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
In post 145, pieguyn wrote:I've already explained that I'm not pushing that you're calling me scum for "being online". you called me scum for "active lurking", and I was merely explaining why this was not, in fact, correct. you kept saying I was being "active on site, but not posting here" - any mention I made of me being "online" was in reference to this. this is fucking simple shit.
(I thought I was never going to be but one of those large-text players, looks like I'm wrong).This is NOT what happened.
If you're town I'll give you a few minutes to reread our entire interaction, my posts or the whole game, whatever you need to and rescind this. Go.-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
I'll run a little summary for you Pie;
1. I found Quilfords early posts as awkward, had a very weak gut-scum read on him from them, Empire agreed and then voted Quilford.
2. I didn't mind Quilfords reaction and subsequent posts and moved my vote to you because I also found your reaction towards Muffin as forced.
3. Stated reads, remembered to mention the Molla read we currently had which included the fact that he'd been active elsewhere on the site while having a really underwhelming post in the thread. At the same time mentioned that we'd both seen you online too which made me more comfortable with my vote.
So there's two comments about you and two comments only1) Your comment being forced to Muffin and 2) You having been online when we checked the site.
So you coming in and saying that the push is "awful/scum" would have to be about one of those two things yes? Can't be 1) since Ffyer and Muffin made the exact same comment and you didn't call their comments "awful/scum". So logically the sole "awful" element that you're claiming about our push is 2) which is stating that you were online whichagainwas not the reason you were voted and was a comment mentioned afterwards which again was a one-sentence line (And is well known that I and others consider it a scum-tell even if a weak one) so your confidence/retaliation doesn't add up with the context of what occurred int he game at all-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
In post 159, Quilford wrote:like actually though, both pie and gb are kind of overblowing it a bit and it's weird.
My issue is his reaction towards our vote, it's so OTT and doesn't add up and he's ignoring large parts of the thread (and context) in it. I also have a problem with his Ffyer read (and lack of read on the bork hydra) as well as him attacking us for not having 'scum-reads elsewhere when it was page 4 with several players not having appeared yet (And several players didn't have scum-reads at the time so him bringing that up makes no sense).
Also you suck, you meant to say you agree with Tammy (P sure Post 157 is her).-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
Hey everyone, I just woke up much later than I had wanted to (I spent way too much of the night talking about this game with Regfan) and I'm now fully caught up. I see Regfan's done a really comprehensive job in responding to pieguyn's posts and I don't really want to become another Thor and add on to the wars when it's unnecessary, but if anyone has any questions they want to ask me about our read on pieguyn, let me know.
Regfan's left me some reads on skype while I was asleep and, while the strength of some reads have changed, he's largely dealing with the same PoE pool as earlier {pieguyn, BBmolla, Soft-spoken, and Yuriko} We both really want to see more from Molla and soft-spoken (especially Molla, who should be really easy for us to read) and more reads-type content from Yuriko, personally I feel like the game's stalling in my mind until they go ahead and do so.
In the meantime, I think it's worth me checking into Yuriko's meta since I found the scum game Regfan linked really disconcerting when he showed it to me on skype a while back.-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
I'm still going through Yuriko's games but I already found some really neat stuff that I am holding onto until she dives into this game a bit more. One thing I do want to point out though is that she seemed to have absolutely no problem doing some good old fashioned, low information D1 scumhunting as both alignments so I don't really understand where her complaints about the setup re: inability to scumhunt are coming from.-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
I'm ISO'ing your slot right now (because fuck reading 342 pages at this instant) and here's a question: do you feel like you used a lot of the circlejerky past game talk as a crutch in the early game in that one?-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
Hey, pieguyn, whenever you come back into this game and feel more cooled down here's one for you: do you feel like your accuracy at reading Muffin has improved a lot over the past year or so? In other words, do you feel paranoid of him in games now like you did before (see: my Large Normal) or no?
(I don't know if I'm phrasing these in a way that makes sense.)-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
Actually, bork, I don't think you have to go back and look right now. I'll read more of the game (and the scum QT) and form my own conclusions myself - I'll let you know if I need you to do so. I'm asking about it because so far it seems to me that that's the biggest thing that differentiates your early play there from your early play here. I'm trying to think through whether a hypothetical pieguyn-town would have picked up the difference at the moment.-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
Obviously ours, sorry mod:
In post 228, Regfan wrote:At work, will get to the rest of the game when I get home tonight.
@Pie -I want you to read the two below posts, think about it, read the thread, then let me know if you still think our "push" on you was bad/scum.
In post 168, pieguyn wrote:it definitely did not come off like it was a weak read. this is more so the case when it was apparently enough for me to be their top scum read.
It was a ridiculously obviously a weak read and it being our "top scum read" doesn't make it a confident one, again it was a page four read based on very little.
In post 168, pieguyn wrote:"lol, pie being online and not posting = scum". *if* GB is town, it's fucking dumb that they would actually have thought I was scum because of that
Again this is not why we voted you, I can't believe I've had to restate this so many times. Had your original posts not existed we would not have had our vote on you at that stage and if we were voting for this reason alone we'd have voted Molla given that it was a slightly stronger scum-tell given his activity elsewhere in comparison to yours looking worse. If you're going to continue with your "I don't believe he'd use bad reasoning like people being online but not posting" then you should read through two recent examples of me bringing up being active elsewhere on the site as a scum-tell. #1 Micro 373 where I pointed Aegor out being active elsewhere but dodging this game (He was scum). #2 Open 567 where I pointed out ZZZX being active elsewhere (He was town). I've played enough games to notice that scum generally do avoid the thread, pop online, read it and not post more than town do (It's entirely possible for town to do it but it does make someone more than randomly likely to be scum), yours was weakened by the fact that you hadn't posted (a lot) elsewhere on the site and it was early game but the fact that we saw you online three separate times when we were was what made it worth mentioning and at a stage where I didn't have any strong scum reads at all did make me feel slightly better about my vote on you. This isn't a very hard thing to understand?-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
Last PiePost, then I'm getting to proper scumhunting.
1) RE Post 230 I've explained what about your push I find incredibly scummy and that's how over-blown it is and how the reasoning doesn't add up with what's happened in the thread - the fact that your town-read explanation on Ffyer similarly ignores what happened in the thread points towards scum fabricating reads (There's plenty of scum motivation to fabricate these particular stances, a) You know that Ffyer isn't going to get mslynched and working on pushing her as town read via "TM meta" gives you an opportunity to try and work a way onto her good side while at the same time "faking scumhunting" and b) If you really think that we're a "strong slot" you'd know it's highly likely that we'd catch you and be more confident about you as mafia as the day progresses making pushing back against us the optimal play, allows you either to have a slim chance of mslynching us but more likely a larger chance of de-crediting us and having people go "Oh it's TvT" over it). I'll quote below since it probably better explains my thought process at the time.
In post 106, pieguyn wrote:I have a town read on ffery. I don't see scum-her walking in here and proceeding to immediately start pushing Empire. the same goes for me given Nacho had explicitly pointed out in their team mafia PT that I tend to be very critical of people pushing me.In post 18, sangres wrote:who made this post?In post 93, sangres wrote:p-edit, I kinda agree about pieguy.
The above is your town read on Ffyer and the posts it's based about, the first one isn't her pushing Empire in a way that she'd avoid doing as scum, it's asking a fairly harmless question for her and the second one isn't really 'pushing your lynch' but moreso just agreeing with others that your intro was awkward which has scum motivation behind it if she's mafia so these being the basis of your town read rather than other posts that we were reading as town while at the same time attacking our Ffyer town read read as superficial / fake scumhunting.
In post 106, pieguyn wrote:GB is scum,or at the very least their push on me is one of the most awful things I think I've ever seen.I haven't been fond of their other posts, either. more elaboration on this incoming.In post 63, Gentlemen Bastards wrote:Unvote, Vote: Pie
Quilford vote still isn't bad butI'm liking this slightly more at the moment, Pies reaction towards Muffin in Post 13 / Post 17 felt over-the-top forced.In post 103, Gentlemen Bastards wrote:Also I forgot to mention it before but neither of us liked Mollas Post 41 nor the fact that he's active elsewhere but here.Similarly Pie has been online a lot since our vote on him and the lack of in-thread reaction is making me feel more comfortable with our vote.
The above is you attacking our comments/'push' on you which didn't and still doesn't match what we actually did. We moved what was essentially an early game pressure vote on Quilford towards you because I wasn't feeling it on him anymore and I thought it'd be more meaningful on you since I disliked your intro posts, then mentioned that seeing you online and not in the thread makes me feel better about my vote (And it's p objectively true that I find that as a scum-tell).
2) You claiming to be "Skeptical" of the way we're viewing the game in Post 231 is massively hypocritical given that you yourself are claiming that you're leaning town on the same four players we are (Even if some of these reads are weak for you which guess what some of them are for us too) leaving you with a similar PoE type pool as of now with the one real change being replacing yourself with us so you finding that a scum-tell makes no sense here.
3) In Post 233 you're massively changing what our (Or my) Yuriko scum-read is based around not to mention ignoring that Yurikos Post 55 states that her "confusion" with how this should be played has nothing to do with people knowing each other or peoples play but solely the setup. My issue is that I'm not able to follow her thought process behind her posts (Her post claiming that this is 'scum sided' while bringing up two huge things that point it towards being town sided is an example of this) and I find that she's purposely avoiding scumhunting talk - both of these I read as scum-tells (And again not rock-solid scum-tells but I do want to see more from her and her to explain her thought process in more depth since I'm willing to admit some if it may be based on her being ESL).-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
Nacho, I'd really recommend y'know reading this game properly (Post 251 proves you haven't really), if you had you'd realise the only person with a town-read on Ffyer for her asking questions alone is Pie. Also if you still feel the same way then run me through the town read on Pie in depth plz.-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
Tammys Post 196 strengthens my town read on the Bork slot; I really like the way she's handling Pie/Us and her reach out attempts to understand Pie better reads really genuine particularly in Post 184. Also don't mind Borks Post 175. Like that Ffyers Post 198 mentioned a lot of things that I'd also thought when reading the earlier pages and matches with how she questioned and interacted with people at the time matched the issues she had, I'm less impressed with Nachos recent posts but I don't think they're scummy moreso just frustrating to read. Would be p shocked if either of these two slots were scum at this point and on the off chance that I'm wrong about either I think it'll be p apparent as the day plays out and last I heard from Empire he was p rock-solid on these two being town as well which helps.
Molla, you're going to have to explain the town read on Pie in Post 205 in more detail because the "She used AtE" in Post 207 isn't going to cut it especially when you saw that was what ETL used in TM to get town read so AtE alone isn't something you'd be considering a strong town-tell here at all. Also want you to explain your "everyone here is difficult to read" stance in Post 202 because we're of the opposite stance on that, we think most people are going to be fairly transparent and easy to read as the day plays out. What's your read on Quilford, what's your read on Ffyerhydra, give us some of your thoughts please.
Town read on Quilford is still largely based on tone, would really like him to actually do more scumhunting and actually explain his "I think this is TvT" stance in more detail because he's really only just touched on it - the only thing isn't based on a difference in the word 'push', there's a lot more to this than that.
Not seeing Nachos scum read on RCB either, I'm not confident they're town by any means but I've liked most of there posts and feel like for the most part there thoughts and reads have matched mine, do need to see more from them (particularly Muffin) to have a strong read there.
Still waiting for literally anything from Soft_Spoken and want Yuriko to answer Post 103 when she gets in here.-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
@Ffyer - I read those posts of Pies and a lot of that is irrelevant given that his town read on you was based on those two lines only, both being incredibly weak and throwaway type lines or questions that aren't unfakeable making his TM explanation not really add up there.
In post 261, sangres wrote:I have read the game in its entirety, Regfan. I'm not particularly inclined to explain the pietown read at this point in time since RBD's read on Pie is a huge part of how I'm reading the slot and I think you are in a tunnel mode wrt pie and I don't think my explanations will be enough to derail you from that tunnel.
I'm happy to wait until RBD posts again but I do want this explained after that and if he's as "obvious" town as you seem to think then explaining it an detail and showing me where/how I'm wrong shouldn't be all that difficult. I'm happy to listen to logic, I'm not convinced he's scum (There are some parts of his reaction that I do read as townish) but there's a lot of issues I have with his reads, stances and attacks on us that he needs to clear up for me.
PEdit: I'll read the posts I'm cut by in a minute and I think Empires just logged!-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
Empires got most of my other thoughts, think he's going back for some for sleep but will post them later. I'm sadly heading to bed too, was hoping to read the PiePosts before I went to bed, likely will wake up and read them in a few hours anyway though I guess.
In post 271, sangres wrote:I'm happy addressing specific points if you want me to. I'm not particularly inclined to type up a wall on why Pieguyn is town because phone and I doubt it will be necessary.
Sure, after RBD posts I'll point out specifically what I want you to comment on but put it this way, the more you explain your town read on Pie then the better chance you have of convincing me that I'm wrong which puts my focus elsewhere and in better places?-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
In post 275, pieguyn wrote:what you're saying here ignores the entire point of my argument. there's a significant difference from actually reading/analyzing mafia posts, and just periodically browsing the site. this is why I thought your angle on me was bullshit - you weren't considering the context. I don't really have any intention of pushing this angle any further since I get expecting me to at least pop in with an "I'm here" post or whatever. however, if you can link me any instances where you called this on someone when they were online elsewhere even though they weren't posting, I'd feel a lot better about it.
Again I don't disagree that context plays a part in the strength of that being a scum-tell, someone avoiding the thread when it's close to deadline and crucial to get a lynch despite being online elsewhere is a significantly stronger scum tell for example but I still find avoidance of popping in and making a post when being online a lot (And you say you were online sporadically, all I knew at the time was the two of had been online a combined three times and seen you online all three of them, heck it's more than like that you're telling the truth because it's a silly thing to lie about but that's not something I knew when I made that comment) a scum-tell, if you need more examples (I'm fairly foggy on the exact context of them and whether it was them being online and not posting, posting in GD or not posting at all), Newbie 1495 about Xay (Scum), Newbie 1256 about LapApe (Town) which was pretty much identical to the post in this game actually.
In post 275, pieguyn wrote:you literally said this. you actually thought I was scum who felt the need to lie about what the definition of a "push" is, for ... no reason. like, suppose for argument's sake I was scum here. what exactly was I attempting to accomplish by doing that? what in god's green earth do I gain by lying about something that's 1. easily fact checkable, 2. such a major point it's pointless to lie about? even *if* I was scum here, the obvious conclusion is still that this is just a huge misunderstanding. and writing it off bc "scum lie/misrep" is one of the dumbest things I've ever heard. it's not about lying/misrep'ing, it's common sense.
I feel I've made it pretty clear that anything resembling poking at someone, asking them questions, putting pressure on them, etc. counts as a "push" in my opinion. I've said this, Quil at the very least pointed it out, but you're ignoring it. this is part of why I really don't see a town approach in how you're pushing this - you keep bringing it up bc you want to look like you have a major point here (that I'm "lying" and thus OMG have to be scum) while hoping no one realizes it doesn't actually make any sense
Do I think you "lying about the definition" is a strong point, no? It's not really what I was trying to say either and it's not a phrase I've used since then (Which was a post I made when I was very very very confident you were scum, something I'm not amymore), I've tried to explain this several times since. The exact issue I have is with your reasoning behind the ffyer town read and your scum read on us (and call of our pushing being awful), ignore the 'definition' of push for a second I have trouble you seeing Ffyers question directed to Empire a town-tell of any sort and similarly have trouble believing the two posts that we made would lead Town!You to "awful/scum", this continues to be a p large concern I have with you.
In post 275, pieguyn wrote:you didn't fully read 230 (which explains why, despite ffery's initial read on me potentially having scum motivation coming from a general player, it isn't what I would expect specifically coming from her as scum) - reread. Nacho is correct that the entire read is based on her confidence. the initial questioning of Empire was obviously a weak tell, hence why I only had a weak town read on her at that point. after I saw another town tell, I was able to solidify the read.
I did fully read #230 and I don't think it's relevant I've commented on this already, a) Nacho hadn't posted at that point and has been very obviously busy site-wide so claiming that your town read stems from something that involves him doesn't add up and if it revolves around pre-game discussion between the two of them it wouldn't rule her out making a throwaway minor comment stating that she can see your posts being awkward too (It's not a stance she'd be scared to state as scum) and I disagree massively re; you claiming that her being confident is the basis for your town read since it's the opposite that I'm reading town from her. I'm finding the reluctance to make a 100% call on our alignment and her explanation for it genuine.
In post 275, pieguyn wrote:55 doesn't remotely say that, though. there's nothing there that's indicative of her having trouble reading the player base. to the contrary, 46 and 102 seem to indicate exactly that - that she's having trouble forming reads for play-related reasons. the point I'm making here, though, is that when someone is confused over the setup, that takes a priority over forming reads. and you pushing her over it, again, ignores the obvious explanation - that she just doesn't understand how the setup works. and if someone doesn't get the roles in the setup, it would affect their play in various ways (hence her not realizing that this is essentially a normal setup, except with a different killing mechanism). but it didn't feel like you were really stopping to consider possibilities here. it looks like you thought, "oh, look at this newb who keeps flip flopping and contradicting herself; it looks like I'd be able to push this really easily", and so there it was.
Except that #55 does state that her difficulty here is with the setup and not the play? Bork effectively asked her how this game differs from other games and she stated that it was based on the setup, her popping in on #102 going "yeah its about play too" makes plenty of sense for scum to add - gives them another excuse to hide behin. And fucking again, my scum read on her is a weak scum read, I'm waiting for her to actually respond to my questions to her (Especially since I'm willingly admitted that I might just be having difficulty following her thought process via her location) and actually give reads and content (Empires waiting for specific things from her too) so you constantly stating "you pushing her looks scummy" is another massively-untrue statement.-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
In post 275, pieguyn wrote:it's fairly obvious that I'm not strictly reading everyone outside of {Yuriko, BBM, S-S} as town. I pretty clearly said in the game thread that I would make it a point to nail down the town reads in the meta circle that I feel less strongly about, since I don't feel comfortable with all of them (I literally said I don't have anything outside of vague town feelings for some of them).you, on the other hand, seem content with it - this is where my issue lies
You have town leans on everyone outside of that PoE pool at the moment, your reads differ in strength, some you're confident about others you're iffy on. Guess what, we're in the same fucking boat and I've mentioned this like 10x now (I can grab quotes if needed but I've explained that I'm far from convinced that Quilfords town and that I want to see some content and scumhunting from him because I think he's lacking in that and that our town read on him is only a tonal one and not a strong one due to it and that our town read on RBD effectively revolves around liking their reads and pushes but isn't a confident one at all and that my town reads are constantly changing in strength) so the bolded actually really really pisses me off and makes me really hope you're scum here.-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
In post 250, sangres wrote:Pie is incredibly incredibly incredibly town. I think I'm going to vote RBD for not seeing that when they should have.
Vote: Rancid Broderick Drake
This is something that needs talked about like ASAP, though. Why does RBD get held to such a high standard of being able to read pieguyn accurately if they're town (assuming pieguyn is actually town here) rather than my slot or Gold Saucer (who I am assuming has been in a number of games with pie)? (Ignore this if this has already been answered, but I am reeling a bit from this vote and I'm not even super confident Muffin is town.)-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
In post 265, sangres wrote:I think Gentleman Bastards is probably town; Regfan engaging tunnel mode after pieguyn overreacted to the initial push on her makes sense, and level engagement here is far more impressive than level of engagement in White Flag plus it would be oh so cruel for the RNG gods to give them scum here.
Also, Nacho, have you read any of my posts? I find it really jarring that you didn't even mention me in this explanation for a townread on our slot.-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
I see bork was asking the same question I was which is neat but I don't believe it was ever satisfactorily answered?
I know I need to ask pieguyn something but I totally forgot what it was.
Right now, still on observation mode while I wait for more content from Soft-spoken (when he's caught up anyway) and Yuriko.
Feel like I've lost my bearings. Maybe coming back to his game when I'm not in an awful mood will help me gamesolve.-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
@Nacho -Now that RBD has responded I'd like you to go into proper detail on two things for me a) Your overall town read on Pie (Consisting of all of his posts) as well as commenting on the reasons I am/was scum-reading him for and how you don't find them relevant, b) Your town read on Pie at the point Muffin had stopped posting earlier on (Back when the argument initially started). I'm happy to wait till when you get a computer if it means you really going into this well since I've actually disliked most of your posts re; Pie/RBD and Empire and I have both had a huge issue following your thought process here.
@Molla -You missed the key thing I wanted you to explain and that's the how you're strongly town reading Pie solely on emotional-basis after seeing ETL massively use it in TM. And the person with the special "tell" on you was Zar, not myself.
I'll get to PiePosts and the rest of the thread when I'm not at work (P much skimmed things on the way to work on the bus and again recently).
In post 298, Quilford wrote:Also there's nothing I find overtly scummy in their posts, but I am getting the slight creeps from sangres playing interpreter to pieguyn so much
This bothered me (Mostly Nachos comments and "Pie is very very obviously town" stance) too because I did consider that he was doing a similar thing re; Pie that he did about Ffyer in the Jos Whelan game we played together, looked that game up though and Empires right in that the tone he did it there is very very different to here. That said we're both disliking the reasoning behind his RBD push and find ourselves agreeing with almost every post from Muffin in their interaction which is why I need more from Nacho here.-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
Works getting slower, I'll leave PiePosts for when I get home since Soft, I want you to explain the "Most legitimate scum-tells are invalid in this setup" stance from Post 367, run me through what scum-tells exactly are invalidated due to the setup and why that's the case. Also you do need to read through pages 6-15, it's all very necessary especially to get a good idea of where peoples reads come from + it's the majority of the content in the game so ignoring it is p idiotic? I find it hard to believe out of everyone in the game the people you're 'following the logic of' the most is Pie and Sangres - explain whatof their play you find genuine and logical for me please.exactly
Molla, re; Post 431 again wasn't what you town read ETL for at times in TM tone so I don't understand your confidence on Pie being town from that alone, you're going to have to elaborate on it for me. I do like your reasoning in Post 464 behind your Yuriko read though, reads genuine. Also re; Post 467 I think I have been ridiculously ObvTown this game, there's a LOT I've done here I don't think I could fake at all.
Soft, I want you to explain the "Most legitimate scum-tells are invalid in this setup" stance from Post 367, run me through what scum-tells exactly are invalidated due to the setup and why that's the case. Also you do need to read through pages 6-15, it's all very necessary especially to get a good idea of where peoples reads come from + it's the majority of the content in the game so ignoring it is p idiotic? I find it hard to believe out of everyone in the game the people you're 'following the logic of' the most is Pie and Sangres - explain whatof their play you find genuine and logical for me please.exactly
PEdit: Explain the "nobody has a known scum partner" section.-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
In post 504, Soft-spoken wrote:i have a 70% scum winrate on most of my accounts on EM
Now you've got to out whoever you are at EM (Though I'm guessing I won't know you?); the both of us initially played EM (A long time ago mostly).
Also please answer the still relevant sections of Post 491.-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
PIEPOST:
1) RE Top Section of Post 301: My issue here is that what you were essentially claiming to have found "BS" was the fact that I mentioned that I'd seen you online several times which had made me for comfortable with my vote and that your reaction to it was "most awful thing ever" - it was so exaggerated that it's not funny, you didn't even consider for a second that it's something I actually find a scum-tell (And guess what I'm far from alone and thinking it's a scum-tell, it's something p widely recognised as an alignment indicative factor, context determines the strength of it but even in this circumstance it's still a scum-tell albeit a very weak one) so I found your reaction there as a "Scum working towards de-crediting and pushing back on me" because it made 10x more sense than town not really considering that it was a very weak read of mine given it was page 4 and again I never ignored context, if it was something thatstronglyimpacted on my read on you I'd have been asking people to vote you and repeating it, it was a really small comment and something that I wanted explained from you when you popped in.
2) RE Next Section of Post 301 I think Fferry (I got it right, Zar will be proud of me) sees that post of Nachos in TM, doesn't think a whole lot of it since and really only makes a minor comment stating that she agrees that your reaction was forced and I think you calling that a town-tell read/reads as superficial scumhunting. Put it this way if you're saying Scum!Fferry is going to avoid callinganythingthat's been done by some of the players that can ObvTown themselves scummy that's very illogical and would make her fairly obvscum since she'd be questioning and uncertain of those players as town at times.
Here's what I need from you;
1) I want links to games where you've complained about people using the word forced and genuine to explain reads as town (This should be an easy one for you to find given that you're claiming it's a major gripe you have about how people explain reads and make you think they're scum bullshiting).
2) I want links to games where you've attacked someone for mentioning the phrase active-lurking or have brought up someone being online but dodging the thread as town (Know this one may be harder to find, happy to wait for a few days if it takes you that long for a particular game to come to mind).
3) Links to any games that you were voted or "pushed" in the early game phase and by early game I mean first 5-10 pages of the game, as both alignments.
4) I want a much more deeper explanation behind how you thought we were "content" with our reads (Even if you've changed it since then) as it would mean ignoring alotof our posts. I can understand this partially being caused by tunnel-vision or confirmation-bias but I want your thought process at the time of making that accusation to then proceed to state the same reads we essentially have. Essentially you said you were "skeptical" of us having our main suspect pool the lesser posters while then taking the same stance yourself - it's a sequence that I'm still having difficulty buying.-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
-
-
Gentlemen Bastards Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: October 23, 2012
@ Pie -Thanks for the meta links, I'll read them tomorrow, it's getting late here and I don't think I can stay up until 2am for this game again and I still want to get through the most recent posts and get my reads out. As for where I stated that I wasn't "content" with all my town reads inside the 'meta-circle' these are the bits I find it hard seeing you miss - Bolded bits are relevant stuff (There's probably more but I'd rather not waste too much time on this), it's pretty obvious that I wasn't in a "Okay they're all def town" position and was still reconsidering a lot of my reads there + there's also a lot behind the scenes as well in discussions with Empire.
Spoiler: Here"
-