Mini 1730: Suikoden U-Pick GAME OVER
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
So it begins.
VOTE: Titus
Because she was scum/Serial Killer in my last game."i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédex
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
Why the heck have I been marked?
Reading up later once I'm not about to cycle 13k."i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
Sorry I've not been too active recentely, I've got an important German exam tommorow (and I suck at German) which I need to get a good grade for. I'll then be posting my usual ammount."i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
I'm free and doing this right now, expect me to have my head back in the fray soon."i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
Well I've read up and the thread is truly filled with utter crap, though I can say I'm not convinced Titus is scum and I have drawn some reads/thoughts from the frey which I'll discuss in later posts.
UNVOTE:
I don't think LQ is scum either."i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
I'll make a post on that, the whole gamestate feels weird to me and I'm lacking strong scum reads. Early game titus' play made me want to shoot her there and then however it's improved and the whole fruit titus/jeanne crap has fried my mind. Something's off but I can't figure out what, how jeanne went from titus saying she's icky to how it is now is beyond me and LQ doesn't seem to be the one we should be going after for reasons I'll explain in my next post.
Also, has nobody yet realised Bright isn't even on the playerlist? I suggest someone claims ownership otherwise we could lynch it. This wasn't a bastard game right?
Also titus could you explain the fruit thing? It's really confusing me.
Those posting too little need to do a little more."i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
Also Ranger, care to say what your mark does?
Are we now destined to be conf-town bro's and carry this game to victory?
Or am I doomed to some horrible and painful death?"i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
Hey elibern, was your early game play to do with some game-mechanic related thing or was it some form of slayer's gambit (I think that's the right one)."i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
Titus' accusations of LQ rolefishing are pretty darn awful and they are the reasons I wouldn't of minded lynching her at that point. It really looked like her play in a currently ongoing game, making something of nothing much and heavily attacking it. I find LQ's reactions to her push fitting and seem to have a town mindset behind them. If he is being honest then I can completely understand the "what in heaven's name is happening" attitude you see in his posts. He also doesn't OMGUS titus which I'd predict a scum-LQ to do. The reason I think it's all not faked? He's a newer player (not a full out newb though) and I doubt he has acquired that level of skill yet.
I can also see a (as put in his own words) "gamesolvey" mentality in his posts, his pushes/reasons are not too bad and he's not just going with flow which I like.
In post 136, LicketyQuickety wrote:In post 132, Ranger wrote:
The majority of your posts have had this unnatural vibe about them. If I felt like explaining in detail greater than that right now, I would have done so already, but generally you'll find I'm a fairly lazy early-game player.LicketyQuickety wrote:I don't like you Scumreading me so early. You got a reason?
K, go ahead and vote me. I got nothing to hide.
despite him not realising he was already voting him I really like this post, I see my own earlier cocky play in it and it really screams town to me.
This vote on me isn't too bad either, despite me actually not having read the thread at that point and just popping in after getting a PM saying I was marked. It's posts like these that make me believe he's trying to solve the game.In post 142, LicketyQuickety wrote:In post 121, wgeurts wrote:Why the heck have I been marked?
Reading up later once I'm not about to cycle 13k.
Wgeurts was the 3rd person to ask about the mark. They've been following people.
VOTE: wgeurts
Also not a bad post showing what I explained earlier, I could grab a few more but I think you get my point by now.In post 196, LicketyQuickety wrote:In post 176, Jeanne11 wrote:Hey, everyone, Titus said it herself, she gets angrier the more certain the probability of lynch is. Let's see if she's gonna start yelling if we lynch her scumbuddy Elbirn.
This is the worst fucking argument I've seen in this thread so far. But Jeanne11 can't be serious her. I still don't like it at all.
I'd really like it if Jeanne11 got some pressure on them, because these kinds of posts are shitty and I don't want to see Jeanne11 skate by with this kind of shit.
VOTE: Jeanne11
I also like how he's not imploding despite being the leading wagon and so much pressure, this is a good sign especially with newer players who don't yet have such feigned confidence in their play. (He also doesn't seem to be too confident in his play either knowing his mafia discussion posts so really I'd expect to see him slowly breaking down by know if he's scum)
Pr-edit: now I'll get to you then titus"i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
So Titus, from a game you know full well what I'm talking about and if you don't look at my first post. You should expect me to be paranoid if you were to pick a target, semi-strawman them, then tunnel them there onwards discrediting those that come to their defence. It was starting to look like this was going to happen, however it slowed down and took a different turn. That cooled my will to lynch you, as well as this weird thing you have with jeanne. I know somethings off there but I've decided to let it resolve itself instead of pursuing it.
Now to why titus' original push was pretty crumpets.
To me LQ's post more read as a growing suspicion that hadn't yet take full form. This kind of gets backed up in his later posts.In post 41, Titus wrote:In post 40, LicketyQuickety wrote:So far I don't like Jeanne11
VOTE: LicketedQuickety
Doesn't like someone. Keeps RVS vote.
I don't like that.
Here, he says he hasn't even asked a question and the post seems to be implying that his feelings towards jeanne weren't complete and he wasn't sure of them at that point. Feeling someone feels different isn't a bad thing and town often do it, heck if you want another example ISO Ranger who said "Brantz" felt off.In post 43, LicketyQuickety wrote:In post 41, Titus wrote:In post 40, LicketyQuickety wrote:So far I don't like Jeanne11
VOTE: LicketedQuickety
Doesn't like someone. Keeps RVS vote.
I don't like that.
Its not enough for a vote. I don't really do the "change RVS votes 5 times in 2 pages." I have not even asked Jeanne11 a question yet.
PEdit: cuz you got the youtube link wrong so I know its out of character for you to use youtube videos.
This is going too far. This is not rolefishing at all and if LQ is being genuine and is town it's definitely not a rolefish, he just feels somethings off. Titus is making the assumption here that LQ is scum and therefore it has to be a rolefish, as if she sees him as town that wouldn't happen. It's too big of a leap to take and titus knows this, it looked to me like one of titus' semi-strawman bogus tunnel arguments she has when she's scum and which I saw very recently.In post 49, Titus wrote:In post 48, LicketyQuickety wrote:In post 46, Titus wrote:Really feeling icky about LQ...
That's not really a protown sentiment to push even if Jeanne is scum...
How is it not pro-town? do we not push Scum or something? C'mon Titus, I know you know better that that.
If she's doing something out of the ordinary, town or scum, it's a crumb of somesort. As such, it's a rolefish.
There's no way you can be so certain he's rolefishing, where's the nagging doubt that says "well, if he's town and what he says is honest I may be wrong". She's jumping to obscure conclusions and stating them as fact, easy enough to do and it looks pretty convincing as scum until people look closer.In post 51, Titus wrote:In post 50, LicketyQuickety wrote:In post 47, Jeanne11 wrote:Well, I could link you, but I cannot really remember where. I've done it on multiple sites.
You and Titus seem to be a little too coordinated for my taste.
PEdit: Why are you giving her that kind of credit Titus?
Stop rolefishing. I'm not giving her credit. I don't fully trust her. You're just rolefishing.
In post 53, LicketyQuickety wrote:In post 51, Titus wrote:In post 50, LicketyQuickety wrote:In post 47, Jeanne11 wrote:Well, I could link you, but I cannot really remember where. I've done it on multiple sites.
You and Titus seem to be a little too coordinated for my taste.
PEdit: Why are you giving her that kind of credit Titus?
Stop rolefishing. I'm not giving her credit. I don't fully trust her. You're just rolefishing.
How the hell is that a rolefish?
In post 55, LicketyQuickety wrote:I have no idea why I am being tunneled right now.
These above to posts seem to indicate LQ is seriously confused at Titus' reasons and I don't believe he's faking it, these are exactly the reactions you would expect if he was being honest about his thing with jeanne."i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
In post 518, Titus wrote:@Jeanne, Cultivate but never forget failsafe procedures.
@Wgerts, My accusations of LQ role fishing stand. A play that supposes dumb town (which you do on LQ) is several layers of ewww and white knight. Forgetting who is voting you is usually, but not always a scum indicator. Him not knowing AUA is pretty bad. Either he has no attention to relevant details or is scum.
Won't lie, I didn't know AUA until I double checked my PM, and why is the latter option not possible? He's a newer player and not that experienced as the mafia discussion posts should show."i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
1 and 3 are both viable options in this case, and I saw it as a tunnel in making myself hence my alarm bells started going off.
Also there's an option 4) LQ simply is misreading/interpreting something.
Looking at the scum/town motivation/mindset for LQ's actions there and the town one makes more sense. You're making the assumption that:
A-Jeanne is town
B-She's not awkward/trying something new
C-LQ's misreading jeane and you may be misreading him.
There are a lot of variables there and that's why I say your accusations of rolefishing far-fetched. I doubt he would even think of role-fishing in such a subtle sly manner as he's not that experienced: and that's something we can prove. The town explanation makes more logical sense than the scum one in my opinion.
Also, can you explain what the heck is going on with you and jeanne plus the fruit?
You started off as sceptical of her support of you and now you act like masons or some crap, what's happened?
If one of you two flips scum I'm willing to bet there is a high chance of you two being partners."i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédex
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédex
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
In post 525, Jeanne11 wrote:@wg That would only be good if I am scum. If you consider the possibility that I am town, his push would seem scum. Unless we lynch townies?
No, the logic isn't if you're town he was rolefishing as there a lot more variables than that.
I see no problem in you both being town to be quite honest."i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
In post 526, Jeanne11 wrote:Also, in my first game here I was also inexperienced, yet I was scum-read because of it. Why should he be exempt from being scum-read just because he is a newb?
He isn't, it however it gives explanations to certain behaviour. I never said he's a newb so let him off, I gave a whole post showing how it makes more sense for him to be town in that area than the rolefishing crumpets. There was a lot more than me "letting him off cause newb"."i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
As he may think your scum?
Man I'd love to know who's town but then this wouldn't be a game. If you're both town someone's making a mistake, that happens and is a possibility!"i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
I never trust anything 100% unless there's undeniable proof, we all can make mistakes and it does happen."i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
You are then a fool, people make mistakes and you are a fool to deny it. If we didn't make mistakes this game wouldn't be physically possible.
Also I don't believe 100% LQ is town, stop misrepping me and counter my points. If you can't counter something you may need to consider your view may be "mistaken"."i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
Like if someone convinces me he's scum I'll think he's scum.
Same for if he acts scummy later."i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
In post 534, Titus wrote:You are so not getting an invitation to the farm.
Any suspicion of mine is a tunnel in the making. It's a load of crap.
I don't have to suppose Jeanne is town to do that, but you and LQ seem to be on the same path regarding Jeanne. Namely that I cannot know Jeanne is town. I can't know anyone is town for certain but I am relatively confident.
Yet you seem to think Jeanne is town. So why are you objecting? Because I figured something out faster than you? :/
Nah, though in your scum play it does happen and you can't really deny that. It was also a suspicion, the fact I'm considering you to be town already shows that I'm considering I may be mistaken. If you weren't tunneling and you're town we then both disagree, one of us is then mistaken and I can live with that (though I'd like to solve it). Also this is exactly the discrediting I was speaking about, show me how I'm wrong instead of just saying it.
Also, jeanne is one of those leaning towards scum."i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
In post 535, Titus wrote:Why the Klingon vote wgeurts?
Will explain later"i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
In post 536, Titus wrote:I also want details about how your read on me evolved.
Have you read my posts at all?
You started of looking similar to a game you were scum in, but your play diverted from that and this thing with you and jeanne indicates to me there is more than what meets the eye."i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
In post 544, Titus wrote:In post 542, wgeurts wrote:In post 536, Titus wrote:I also want details about how your read on me evolved.
Have you read my posts at all?
You started of looking similar to a game you were scum in, but your play diverted from that and this thing with you and jeanne indicates to me there is more than what meets the eye.
And you never considered me "rescuing" a buddy by posting gibberish wilfully?
Yes I have, I even have notes on it:
Things I jotted down in my catchup wrote:-If Titus is scum jeanne is likely a partner 74 could be seen as distancing for instance. Keep an eye on this and await flips.
-Suspicion at those that join LQ's wagon opportunistically though is good.
-What changed from finding Jeanne's buddy slimy to town?
-What happens on page 8 is really beyond me. What's up with the fruit and interaction with Jeanne"i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
No, that's a jotted down later associative which I can refer back to later. Note the "keep an eye on and await flips""i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédex
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédex
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédex
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédex
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédex
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédex
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédex
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
In post 612, Jeanne11 wrote:@FK How? Well, it's simple. If Titus is town, she won't associate with scum.
Yeah, I know my logic is weird, but so is wg's idea to vote a townie for the lulz.
?"i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédex
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
In post 629, Titus wrote:Wgeurts is also obvscum.
How?"i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
UNVOTE:
No it isn't I changed my mind for reasons that will become clear later and others I can give now."i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédex
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
It's almost hilarious how wrong you are once again with reading me and that'll too become clear later, have you ever got my alignment correct?"i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
In post 650, Titus wrote:In post 647, wgeurts wrote:UNVOTE:
No it isn't I changed my mind for reasons that will become clear later and others I can give now.
Then you should. Fmpov, you got caught with your hand in the cookie jar.
But I'm not
You like gambit's this whole thing looked like a giant gambit and seemed to coincidental when the day-lock happened. If you were informed then I really wouldn't have expected you to know when the lock would happen, your whole "good harvest" post suggested that you did. Now I fully believed that you have that messenger ability and setup some secret code, however the informed thing seemed like a lie. You would come out of this looking incredibly town having coordinated town into not just willy nilly flopping around when the lock happens, titus the saviour from this awful scum role. It's a good gambit, but how would you have known when it would have happened?
That felt off.
Also how your handling RR is a little weird.
I was wrong though and what you did makes sense, I'm going to reread again using this info."i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédex
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
Second, I was more concerned with what scum would do. Active smart town vote LQ. Active dumb town vote Jeanne (hence the dog). Scum vote Jeanne or stay out of the box. That's what I expected if LQ scum and no scum in Jeanne Elbrin Suzune.
Why would they vote LQ?"i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
In post 662, Titus wrote:Klingon's Ranger vote also needs to be explained.
Scum think it's a trap, they all rebel and no vote. They wouldn't have any reason to think it's a trap. You can throw a lot of words out, but unless someone told them, they would have no idea. Even if they did, what scum thinks MASS ANONYMOUS VOTING THAT ENDS THE DAY is town? They think SK.
You also read it as a gladiate which tells me you failed to comprehend posts. A rally cry is not a gladiate.
Nope, scum act like wgeurts. Please read posts. Ty.
It felt it was a trap but done by scum?
Why not vise-versa?"i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédex
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
Also titus, will you put in your sig "I can't read wgeurts, you should read him the opposite of what I do" for a month if I'm town?
As so far you've never done it right."i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
How do you know?
Make a case, convince me. Anyone can say someone's scum, however I'm town reading him so you'll have to convinve me otherwise."i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
In post 667, Titus wrote:In post 663, wgeurts wrote:In post 662, Titus wrote:Klingon's Ranger vote also needs to be explained.
Scum think it's a trap, they all rebel and no vote. They wouldn't have any reason to think it's a trap. You can throw a lot of words out, but unless someone told them, they would have no idea. Even if they did, what scum thinks MASS ANONYMOUS VOTING THAT ENDS THE DAY is town? They think SK.
You also read it as a gladiate which tells me you failed to comprehend posts. A rally cry is not a gladiate.
Nope, scum act like wgeurts. Please read posts. Ty.
It felt it was a trap but done by scum?
Why not vise-versa?
Why would scum trigger anonymous voting D1? Or mass end day? Both?
Did you run this down? It's wrong but still should have lead you to vote LQ.
As I explained as a gambit to look town"i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédex
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
Suzune, Ranger, Firekari, Jeane11
No one LQ was a beacon of towniness on this wagon, what's making the possibility he's town and people on it are scum impossible?"i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
Really titus there is nothing that is pointing against those being on LQ actually being opportunistic scum? Why isn't this possible?
It's apparently more scummy in your eyes to vote for the person who's unlikely to get lynched?
Titus, it was as bright as day that you weren't simply informed that ability was active. Your secret language was subtle but your "this will be a good harvest" made it very clear you knew that the vote anon thing was about to happen. You spoke of accelerating it and stuff as well, meaning you had control somehow meaning your informed was a lie.
Why would scum use it know?
Idk?
Because that's what town would do if they had the role to look town?
Your logic at the moment doesn't work."i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
Fudge these english errors, I'm going to my PC
Also titus, what does elibern have to do with this?"i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédex
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
His reads list was a literal copy of titus'. It's opportunistic and the posts after it give me the imperssion he's setting up to wagon any of the global possible lynches.
My reread also is giving me other reads which I'll give when done."i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédex
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
That's black-mail.
Don't reveal unless you need to as you're potentially a strong town role."i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
It's not proven scum if claimed later at all.
Town can quite understandably not claim double voter as well. You're not the almighty god here."i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
So, my actual reads after rereading the game.
BlackestMagic -Null-Town
So far there has been very little content from this slot and there posts feel rather disconnected at the moment. There's a lot of commenting here and there but not a lot of bite, and definitely no scum hunting at the moment. Despite all this there's nothing really scummy in their posts as of now, if this continues all game however I may have to rethink.
Questions:
Have you finished catching up?
What are your thoughts on LQ?
What made you possibly scum read titus in post 356?
FireKari -Light-Scum
This slot has really just been posting fluff right from the start and I still haven't figured if yukari is a clever troll or is serious about all this weird confusing gibberish they post. Not to mention in post 134 they were town reading LQ and then later in post 189 they just naked vote him opportunistically with the reasoning consisting of "die scum". They have parked there ever since and have yet to provide reasoning, one of those that could be scum on a possible LQ town "anon"-wagon.
Questions
Why were you originally town-reading LQ and what caused the change?
What are your thoughts on matters right now?
Klingoncelt -Null-Scum
So her first post (98) was already weird as not only is it contradictory it also feels really distanced, I fail to see why town would make that post. He just coasts-by until his reads list in post 452. It's really easily flung together, what makes it worse is that she doesn't actually vote any of the two scum reads she states in it. This lax, go with the flow attitude is not looking good in my eyes. The only thing that raises doubts with me is that she's probably over-extended in too many games. 8-12! That's way too many for me to manage so it may be affecting his play as well.
Questions
Why are you not voting anybody despite having stated scum-reads?
What are your reads after recent events?
Ranger -Light-Scum
So let's start with Ranger, he comes in marks me with some unexplained thing and votes Brantz. His next post 125 and 126 he votes LQ without any reason what so ever, it feels a little opportunistic as LQ was under quite a bit of pressure around then. His scum read on Brantz is also complete crumpets as that slot hasn't actually really produced any content worth pushing yet. Apparently his "felt forced", go check post 9 to see why this really is rather far-fetched.
He then tunnels LQ while the pressure remains to exist on him. All the way up to post 748 where he suddenly creates a reads-list identical to titus' containing no reasoning for the reads at all. His 768 is also horrifically scummy, it looks likes he's setting himself up to vote whoever the town ends up deciding to lynch. He's not pushing, he's not making his own reasons and he's definitely not explaining any of his actions. I also call complete bollux that he was scum reading me early game and thus marked me, he stated all other scum reads but happened to leave me unmenioned?
Questions
Could you explain in your own words how everyone you listed as scum is actually scum in your eyes?
Why did you originally scum read LQ?
What do you think or Brantz now? He's not changed anything since you last scum read him but he's suddenly null.
Why where you originally scum reading me?
What does the mark do!? You may have fucked over town with a role that you could have used better.
Elibern -Town
So I'm still a little confused about what he was doing early game. Was it some sort of gambit to try and catch scum? If so what conclusions did you draw?
Anyway, I like his play and he's been scum hunting. His thought process seems clear and natural so he can sit in my town pile for now.
Questions
Can you explain to me what on earth you were doing early-game and what results it gave you?
Jeanne -Light-Town
Honestly, I don't know really know what to make of this slot. However after my reread I'm left with the feeling that it's town, for some weird gut reason. The whole lunatic fruit thing now makes sense so that's no longer an issue for me. I'm going to come back to this slot later as I want to sort it more firmly.
Titus -Scum
So titus' first push on LQ is crumpets and right now she is using faulty logic to justify reads made by the wacky gambit thing she pulled off while disrepping the person speaking out against her reasoning she's applied to it. Then we have her pushing too much to look town. I had originally waved away my initial suspicions and RR does have a strong point against her. I've made up my mind, this isn't the town titus I know and I see the similarities to her scum game. Unless her town play has changed dramatically it's not this, it feels off and just like the last game I was right I'm going to trust my instinct and gut.
Reasonably Rational -Light-Town
Their early game play was a bit lacking however their recent posts are looking a lot better and their logic is good. There's also drixx being his bitter self which tends to point to him being town, I could go on and give examples of why I think they're town if you want but I've summarised it here.
Brantz -Null
Almost no content and almost nothing alignment indicative from this slot with a total of 3 posts. Null.
LQ -Light-Town
Explained before. Hasn't changed.
Pistach -Null-Town
This slot doesn't have a lot of content and I'd like to see more posts from them but they're leaning town for me.
Suzune -Town
Suzune's early scepticism of Elibern's weirdness was pretty towny and her thoughts throughout the game seem natural. I can see a town-motivation in her posts.
Honestly my detail has become less throughout this post as I've gotten bored of making it so just ask me on things I'm missing/you want to know."i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
In post 838, Jeanne11 wrote:So people who read other people town won't even care if those people turn out as scum. They'll be like 'but I read them as town.....'. Same goes for vice versa.
I am done with this. In the last game I played, town let themselves be manipulated far too easily, and same thing is happening in this one. >.>
If they flip scum I'll do some VCA, hunt for some possible associatives and if it's end-game; reread.
What's going wrong?
Also trust wins games, if town don't take a leap of faith at times it's hard for them to win and they will kill themselves."i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
LQ, his thoughts don't seem false and the whole early game gambit was pretty good.
Also Jeanne, who do you think is scum?
What do you think of me?
I want to sort you and I think conversing with you will help"i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands
Well nevermind what you think of me
And yes, trust can backfire. Hence it's called a "leap of faith", you're not certain and we all make mistakes at times. Doesn't mean we should never try, it's like having a car crash once and never driving again. Town blocs win games, sometime's they will backfire but those other times..."i agree we should have a rule against wgeurts" -Davsto
"let's have 2 rules against wgeurts" -DeathRowKitty
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédex
-
-
wgeurts They/ThemPokédexThey/Them
- Pokédex
- Pokédex
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: September 15, 2014
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: The Netherlands