In post 1219, pisskop wrote:Lets lynch Gliffie, EPM, Tmj, West, or johnny
I would narrow that to EPM, TMJ, or West.
In post 1219, pisskop wrote:Lets lynch Gliffie, EPM, Tmj, West, or johnny
In post 1227, West9 wrote:I was about to say, why remove Gliffie?
In post 1229, pisskop wrote:And you liked Titus.
In post 1231, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Also I mean why cut me out of the suspect list? The townreads I am getting are from people who know my play, which is not a camp you've slept in
In post 1230, JohnnyFarrar wrote:In post 1228, bji wrote:In post 1227, West9 wrote:I was about to say, why remove Gliffie?
I like Gliffie. Gliffie replaced Aero, who I also liked.
Butt y tho
In post 1200, VictorDeAngelo wrote:
Yes it is. You originally claimed that there nothing new. The fact is there was clearly stuff you should have responded to in the post. You can't just take a large post and then highlight the odd sentence where I repeat something said before, out of context, just to try and show I said nothing new. It's a cheap attempt to score points and town doesn't do that in my experience.
VictorDeAngelo wrote:
No, it's not that our position's are irreconcilable, it's your thought process that is. You can't say that:
1It's possible referencing Titus was innocent and therefore your explanation makes sense.
2Referencing Titus is still suspicious.
And expect to be taken seriously do you?
VictorDeAngelo wrote:
Except you know that the reason I said I agree with Titus is because I agreed with Titus. It wouldn't be worth saying "I agree with some of what Gliffe is saying but differ in the following...." or something ridiculous to that extent.
VictorDeAngelo wrote:
Oh look, another quote of mine with the context mysteriously removed.
VictorDeAngelo wrote:
Anyway, how is the way me and TMJ behaving consistant with scum bussing?
VictorDeAngelo wrote:
1You ignored literally every question in 1187, even the part where I asked you to rephrase your own question so I could actually respond.
VictorDeAngelo wrote:
2No misrepping != scumhunting.
VictorDeAngelo wrote:
3But youdidn'tdefend it. When I challenged you, you simply handwaved my entire post away. I had to bait you into defending yourself. And despite the fact it was the first time I comprehensively responded, you claimed there was "nothing new" and tried to quickly put the topic behind us. That's not what the way you treat a top scumread.
VictorDeAngelo wrote:
bji wrote:VictorDeAngelo wrote:
If someone challenges your case, especially one of your top scumreads, why back away? Why agree to disagree?
Because I believe that we've made our cases and I don't see them progressing much further with further discussion. That's why. I don't want to waste everyone's time with repetitive arguments.
You can't be serious right?
In post 1240, evilpacman18 wrote:Has Prolapsed claimed or something? Why is nobody trying to lynch him?
Prolapsed Brain wrote:
God, so many delicious scums to choose from. It's like a buffet.
Let's go back to this one:
UNVOTE:
VOTE: SillvverrWollff
In post 1249, evilpacman18 wrote:I literally just posted the first of a series
In post 1251, pisskop wrote:In post 1250, bji wrote:In post 1249, evilpacman18 wrote:I literally just posted the first of a series
I think you post may have been too long. Apparently if a post takes more than 10 seconds to read, no one wants to read it.
No, if he doesnt post it we can't read it. Don't project.
In post 1244, Aristophanes wrote:Honestly not reading all that.
Gimme a tl;dr both of you.
Why, in one small paragraph, is the other scum (I assume you're arguing the other is scum)
In post 1264, evilpacman18 wrote:Here's 30-35.
Before I start, I wanted to point out that it occurs to me that there is probably a significant reason why SW's very frustrated freak out involved yelling at bji and Prolapsed in particular. Not just because she pegged them as the two people who were attacking her the most. It seems like more than that. The way I see it the two options are that she either freaked out at both her scumbuddies for picking her out as the weak link or freaked out at one of her scumbuddies for doing that and tried to cover it with a second freakout on someone else. I really think it's impossible that neither of Prolapsed or bji is scum. Of course rn I think it's Prolapsed but I don't find it difficult to hold onto my previous scumread of bji even though he was so important in getting SW/Titus lynched. Just a thought. I'm gonna try to read these 5 pages without tunneling Prolapsed... TOO much.
evilpacman18 wrote:
nothing to say about 30...
751 is STUPID opportunistic. Prolapsed is eager to please the town PR. And never gave any explanation for why he unvoted SW in the first place.
evilpacman18 wrote:
Lapsa must've killed Count Dooku because of post 788 and subsequent pisskop attacks. Sensible but TJM was obviously the best pick. (Well Lapsa was the best pick for a vig kill but Lapsa being the vig fucks that up)
evilpacman18 wrote:
800 rings bells/validates the possibility of bji scum. Pisskop points out why in the next post but does not mention that 800 is not only wrong but scummy. I am mentioning that. Sorry bji, my townread on you was pretty short lived.Also notice that the first prolonged period of time where bji is not voting coincides with the period of time where Titus is turning out to be the only viable vote...
evilpacman18 wrote:
828... defense of Prolapsed at the same time as admitting that he has not displayed any intent to make reads. This inadvertently plays down how hard Prolapsed had been pushing SW for most of the game which is also relevant and scummy. Idk if scum bji would target and defend a scumbuddy playing terribly though... too speculative.
evilpacman18 wrote:
the thing is bji seems always to work way too hard to be scum. but maybe he just has a lot of time irl. Still leaning way more towards Prolapsed as the scum in the duo.
evilpacman18 wrote:
overall there's not much to say on 30-35. Only like 5 people are posting for most of it. Gliffie's concern with the wagon reads as legitimate even though it's unfortunate as a defense of now-flipped scum.
Johnny is up in the air.
In post 1270, bji wrote:
Hard to believe that in 10 pages of reading you couldn't come up with anything about anyone other than me and Prolapsed Brain though.
In post 1272, evilpacman18 wrote:Most of the posts in that region of the game are from you, Prolapsed, pisskop, and Titus. And the two dead town. I've given At least some reason for town reads on several other players involved around there, and also suggested who alternative choices for scum but haven't seen much from those people (Johnny and West did not post much between 25 and 35, for instance) to supplement a proper read of them
In post 1274, evilpacman18 wrote:In post 1270, bji wrote:
I'm not sure you have provided much reasoning for why SW would rage against scumbuddies. And furthermore, I didn't see SW yell at ProlapsedBrain during her freak out at all. She yelledabouthim, but not at him. She yelledatme.
This is a good observation. I think the different nature of her approach to the two of you probably suggests only one of you is scum and again I'm still leaning towards whoever just replaced into Prolapsed's slot. SW's yelling about Prolapsed kind of sounds like "how come you guys can see through my ruse but not his?" Do you not see that subtext? I mean I guess I can't expect you to see subtext that hints at the possibility of your being scum regardless of your alignment but it seems clear to me that the nature of the her breakdown has to do with more than just being found out.
In post 1280, West9 wrote:SORRY FOR THE NOTEWALL I HOPE THIS ISN'T TERRIBLE TO READ.
In post 1228, bji wrote:In post 1227, West9 wrote:I was about to say, why remove Gliffie?
I like Gliffie. Gliffie replaced Aero, who I also liked.
You should take a look at his iso. It reveals some pretty sketch interactions with Titus. A bunch of weird, waffle-y "Titus is bad but so is this wagon on her" things and some attempts to encourage a wagon swing towards PB and Ari. I wanted to look more into this after people told me about what they usually expected from scumtitus, but that didn't happen, so bleh.
In post 1280, West9 wrote:
In post 1264, evilpacman18 wrote:the thing is bji seems always to work way too hard to be scum.
huh? p-edit: okay I guess bji knows what this means? This point is very lost on me.
In post 1282, pisskop wrote:In post 1279, Aristophanes wrote:PK, with Ep's recent postings, are you still thinking them scummy?
You never did follow up on that really.
Maybe. I want Gliffie.
West wanting Gliffie is nice, but mah feelz.
vote: Gliffie
West, whats your opinion of Johnny and TJM?
In post 1287, VictorDeAngelo wrote:
The only explanations that I have been able to come up with for why she freaked out are, like your explanations, centered on the concept of being frustrated that she was being accused of being scum partly because of actions of a scum buddy. VDA fits in here because it's his initial points about her bad vote on Lapsa that she didn't seem to be able to escape, not being able to win the argument with him, and then when it seemed it had blown over, I came in and hammered on that point hard again. Another possiblity is, like you said, Prolapsed Brain, who kept voting for her pointlessly, going right back to her every time (and often voting repeatedly just to irritate her apparently). But I don't have strong conviction on either of these.
In post 1311, pisskop wrote:Im curious why you keep asking that.
In post 1314, evilpacman18 wrote:That's a completely wasted vote. Especially if you agree with lynching TMJ AND realize it's happening no matter what, you might as well finish it, give the mod a chance to replace Gliffie, and try again tomorrow after evaluating her replacement. Your vote on her slot shows that. Honestly if TMJ ends up being a town flip you're gonna start to look pretty bad.
In post 1321, VictorDeAngelo wrote:
Wow, you really mustn't be paying attention to have to ask questions like this.
In post 1325, VictorDeAngelo wrote:
2) Chaos has stated intent to hammer, and requested a claim. So effectively, he is hammering TMJ.
VictorDeAngelo wrote:
3) Do I need to explain why it isn't suspicious that Pisskop and West haven't hammered or are we done here?
In post 1333, Tjoe Min Ja wrote:Oh well. So fast uh? I see it coming though.
In post 1349, pisskop wrote:In post 1050, Tjoe Min Ja wrote:@Titus your reading is purely based on gut feeling. U only try to lynch the inactive to find way out.
vote titus
In post 610, Tjoe Min Ja wrote:@aristophanes : what do you think about the latest bji vs silverwolf?
In post 1208, Tjoe Min Ja wrote:Can you elaborate why you think me and victor is scum bussing?
In post 1353, VictorDeAngelo wrote:I think the last scum is in {Ari, Texcat, bji}. Discuss.
In post 1355, VictorDeAngelo wrote:In post 1354, bji wrote:In post 1353, VictorDeAngelo wrote:I think the last scum is in {Ari, Texcat, bji}. Discuss.
Are you still butt hurt over our argument?
Was I ever butt hurt over our argument?
In post 1359, pisskop wrote:Most notably
Victor has been on scum almost thewhole time. Is he that good, or bussing the bus?
VictorDeAngelo wrote:
I'll admit the wagon is quick, but now we're not lynching Ari and the deadline is approaching there is a degree of urgency so fast wagons will kinda happen.
In post 1357, VictorDeAngelo wrote:
I didn't see what you said about him. You can requote it if you want to. I included him for the same reason as you.
bji wrote:
I agree that the Pea Brain slot is highly suspicious at this point. My reasoning is almost entirely based on SW's freak out. Now that we know that TMJ is scum, it explains alot. It would seem that SW was upset because she knew she didn't have much of a scum team to rely on. TMJ was obviously not going to be much help. It seems very likely that SW felt like the rest of her team wasn't helping or wasn't going to be helpful either, and got frustrated when she, as the only "good" player on the team, was the one the wagon was forming on. So who else would SW have perceived as an unhelpful or maybe even hostile scum partner, to the extent that she felt like she'd rather quit than play with that team?
Pea Brain looks like a likely candidate. His multi-voting on SW almost looks like a really mocking form of bussing. Maybe SW got really frustrated by that.
In post 1371, texcat wrote:Ari because we hope is role is eventually provable.
In post 1375, texcat wrote:If he proves his role, I probably wouldn't worry about him until close to the end. If he doesn't prove it soon, he's definitely going to need more attention. How likely do you think it is that he targeted Johnny last night?
In post 1400, West9 wrote:bji, are you able to confirm that he tried to neighborize Lapsa night 1?
In post 1404, VictorDeAngelo wrote:
Bji, can I get a ChaosOmega case. Just the main points will do, I don't want a lengthy pbpa, just something I can read in a reasonable time frame.
In post 1287, VictorDeAngelo wrote:
You need to elaborate, because simple quoting posts with where we vote each other is a waste of time.
In post 1413, VictorDeAngelo wrote:
I don't see what being interesting has to do with anything. He was fairly obviously scum. When you say "The fact that you, VDA, would go directly after TMJ of all people at the beginning of Day 2," who exactly think I should be going after?
In post 715, VictorDeAngelo wrote:In post 714, VictorDeAngelo wrote:In post 712, Tjoe Min Ja wrote:@lapsa : when are you going to hammer?
Wow, I keep forgetting your in this game.
Any chance of some content before the day ends?
For instance, what are your thoughs on the Ari wagon and the people on it?
In post 893, VictorDeAngelo wrote:In post 716, Tjoe Min Ja wrote:Its work hour here. Gonna reply in a few hours.
Your few hours have come and passed.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: TMJ
In post 1049, VictorDeAngelo wrote:unvote
VOTE: Titus
I'm around to switch to P.Brain if need be until the deadline.
In post 1414, bji wrote:
It's not clear to me exactly when TMJ went from "forgettable" to "obvious scum". I don't see a progression in this read, it goes straight from "forgettable" to "scum because he isn't posting/voting", to "obvious scum".
In post 1413, VictorDeAngelo wrote:In post 1412, bji wrote:I have a working theory that SW replaced out because she felt little or no support from either scum partner. TMJ flipping scum makes half this case. The question then becomes who else would fit the bill as an unsupportive scum partner. PB seems like a really good choice. I can 100% see PB having some kind of weird sense of humor where he thought that it was cool to bus a partner by multi voting them like that. It fits with PB's other weird behavior.
It's a theory, one that I'm not sure holds a lot of weight, and I certainly would let guide a lynch.
In post 1417, VictorDeAngelo wrote:In post 1414, bji wrote:In post 1413, VictorDeAngelo wrote:
I don't see what being interesting has to do with anything. He was fairly obviously scum. When you say "The fact that you, VDA, would go directly after TMJ of all people at the beginning of Day 2," who exactly think I should be going after?
You quoted my question but you didn't answer it.
In post 1421, West9 wrote:Egh. I was kinda thinking that this was one of those "newb-bji trying to back-up a scumread and in the process seeing every action that someone made in a scummy light" things again, but this is actually super gross. As is his ignoring of most of 1417.
In post 1428, West9 wrote:In post 1426, bji wrote:I'm not voting VDA, but I'm not backing down when he asks me why I found him suspicious.
But apparently backing down once he pokes some pretty significant holes in your case? Also, are we really already going to the past tense there
In post 1430, VictorDeAngelo wrote:In post 1426, bji wrote:
Also, Victor, if the day 1 and day 2 scum were so obvious, can you say who the obvious day 3 scum is?
Not with any degree of certainty I'm afraid (and I don't know if I ever went as far as to say that SW/Titus was obvscum).
In post 1476, pisskop wrote:theres no 3p. But that was wonderful. Brought a tear to my eye. Like, the best results I could ask for.
vote: Texcat
In post 1475, VictorDeAngelo wrote:FWIW; West is currently in my "I do lynch want to lynch this player today" pile. I advise everyone on the West to either get off, or tell me why I'm wrong.
In post 1470, West9 wrote:Gliffieslot case, if some of you are interested in refocusing and/or playing the game.
In post 445, Gliffie wrote:
TJM- Oh dear, not much happened here, did it? Bad bji vote and some not very interesting questions. I eagerly await future contributions.
SilverWolf- Seems fine.
Other people were given analysis during his initial post. These two weren't.
West9 wrote:
Only interested in TMJ read out of Dooku's list.
West9 wrote:
Gliffie wrote:What the fuck is going on. Correct me if I'm wrong: Titus is a known sharp player, completely and utterlty missunderstands pisskop, this is apparently scum slip of the century, suddenly L-1? This seems so dumb on both ends. Titus, you are paying attention to the game right? Your posts feel so unfocused. I really don't like this wagon either. It's so incredibly rushed. Why are VDA, P Brain and Lapsa on it? Is just just #YOLOSWAGWAGON or did I miss your actual reasons? Ari's jump onto the wagon feels really opportunitsic too. Oh, and bji is back. Man...
Defense/not defense of titus where he also attacks the Titus wagon.
West9 wrote:
In post 858, Gliffie wrote:I don't think it's that unlikely. Cheetory does not originate from this site and this is the first game he's hosting here. Do you think the list mod would not have approved it?
Still pushing for Ari lynch.
West9 wrote:
In post 873, Gliffie wrote:I doubt you will get anything out of Pea Brain anyways. Someone should just shoot that guy before we waste a lynch on him. I'm all for him giving reads though, if he can accomplish such a feat.
The next day:
In post 1017, Gliffie wrote:VOTE: Prolapsed Brain because I think there's a bigger chance he'll flip scum. I'll hammer Titus before the deadline to avoid a no lynch though. Gj to scum for making me chose between two players who aren't my top scumread. (Someone please vote Ari with me).
West9 wrote:
About my L-2 vote: You guys seriously need to put more thought into that, because there was ZERO motivation for scumWest to vote for Titus at that point in any way possible. Why? Well, on D1 if you were going to bus someone, why wouldn't you bus TMJ? Why would you bus Titus who could potentially be of great benefit to you?
In post 1389, texcat wrote:In post 662, West9 wrote:Silverwolf/bji: eh. this isn't really fun to read. I need a reader's digest version of 632. bji's cluelessness and Silverwolf's exaggeration seem real. That tells me little about alignment.
At face value, I super don't feel comfortable following VDA, PBrain, and bji into this wagon, so we should kill Ari instead.
In post 872, West9 wrote:I agree that SW looked genuine but the fact that she replaced means to me that the exasperation was alignment-neutral
This is the kind of soft defense that I would expect from a scum buddy.
West9 wrote:
What happened was that Texcat searched through my ISO, trying to find dirt on me so that she could hastily put together a case and get me mislynched, forgot to check for context, and made a scummy error which she hasn't acknowledged. And she hasn't acknowledged it because she is not trying to find scum.
West9 wrote:
In post 1440, texcat wrote:Should we talk about why Johnny is dead?
I actually had him very close to the top of the scum list during my read thru. He seems an odd choice for NK.
then:
In post 1445, West9 wrote:In post 1434, pisskop wrote:The Johnny kill was odd, but perhaps the scum was trying to eliminate more PRs.
Texcat came straight out of the gates pushing for a West lynch. Johnny would have been maybe the hardest person to get to support a West lynch. Therefore, Johnny needed to go.
In post 1494, texcat wrote:
Ugh. Really? There is absolutely no way I would have killed Johnny if I were scum. No effing way! It would be a totally boneheaded move from anyone except Johnny.
In post 1497, texcat wrote:Are you pulling my leg?
The "Ugh. Really?" was in response to you. I can't understand why you thought that the Johnny part of West's argument held any water at all.
texcat wrote:
Where was Johnny on your list? Was he a town read for you? He certainly was not for me.
In post 1499, texcat wrote:And, yes, I asked the question about Johnny. I was hoping that someone would come to the same conclusion that I did if they thought about it. If say, Pisskop had thought about it and come to the conclusion that only West had a motive for killing Johnny it would have carried more weight and Johnny would have had a harder time turning it around to be an accusation on me.