Open 633: Near Vanilla-GAME OVER

[Nosferatu]

VOTE: OllieVOTE:

I forgot about this game

[Nosferatu]

VOTE: Ollie

I forgot about this game

[Nosferatu]

yeah I also hadn't read your post. Get over yourself.

[Nosferatu]

yeah I also hadn't read your post. Get over yourself.

So you are saying it was just pure coincidence that you showed up 10 minutes after someone specifically mentioned your lack of thread presence? I find it as suspect as anything else three pages into the game. Hell, it's not like you were V/LA or anything.

Uh yeah, it was coincidence. You are not so strong a presence that I would go and post specifically because

you

said I wasn't here. I was posting in other threads, why do you think I would post there and not here?

[Nosferatu]

Uh yeah, it was coincidence. You are not so strong a presence that I would go and post specifically because

you

said I wasn't here. I was posting in other threads, why do you think I would post there and not here?

Um why again do you keep making this about that I mentioned you specifically as the point? Had anyone mentioned your lack of presence and then you popped up 10 minutes later I would find it suspect. I mean is it possible you just plain forgot about this game? Sure, but it worth poking at regardless and your reaction of "Oh get over yourself you aren't that important" pings my gut as a bit outsized honestly.

So vote stays. Plus you are an undead monster out to drink our blood, right?

It's not that you mentioned me. It's that you thought that I would post simply because some random person said I wasn't present.

[Nosferatu]

nothing happened.

[Nosferatu]

yeah I also hadn't read your post. Get over yourself.

Assuming you just now remembered this game, why throw down an RVS vote as opposed to offer your thoughts on the non-serious content in the thread?

not RVS.

24/25 <--- who states suspicion only to come back literally an hour later to put a vote down? I could understand if it were a few minutes later and you were like "oh ya, I forgot to vote him actually" but no, he calls him tryhard scum, which is like ¿qué? cause like one thing is saying he was to lengthy in his response to a naked vote, (which I don't even get I mean when did post length become alignment-indicative) but another is calling him tryhard scum based on one post.

[Nosferatu]

can we just KT = KTthecreeper and Kain = KainTepes?

It's so much easier this way

lowell: townreading so easily is how I won against you last game as scum fam

[Nosferatu]

yeah I also hadn't read your post. Get over yourself.

Assuming you just now remembered this game, why throw down an RVS vote as opposed to offer your thoughts on the non-serious content in the thread?

not RVS.

24/25 <--- who states suspicion only to come back literally an hour later to put a vote down? I could understand if it were a few minutes later and you were like "oh ya, I forgot to vote him actually" but no, he calls him tryhard scum, which is like ¿qué? cause like one thing is saying he was to lengthy in his response to a naked vote, (which I don't even get I mean when did post length become alignment-indicative) but another is calling him tryhard scum based on one post.

You voted for me with a naked vote, having clearly ignored what had happened so far. So I ask you what you think about what's happened to try & get you to comment on it. You say:

"Nothing happened"

. Which we know is untrue as there was a wagon forming on KT & disagreement about that as well. So you hadn't read the thread & no mention of anything I've done & that you voted for me for any reason at this point. Then when pressed on your out of place RVS vote by OceanWind, you say something I did was scummy to come up with a reason for your vote to try & prove that it wasn't. But you already said that nothing had happened & gave no reason for your vote at the time. As for what you've said about me, basically everything you could possibly use about my play so far including timing of my vote, also ignoring any thought about the context of what I may be doing, to try & justify your vote.

I had read what had happened so far. The last game with KT progressed exactly the same way. Someone naked votes him, he overreacts, wagon forms, people argue over the wagon's existence, blah blah blah. So yes. There was nothing unique about the KT wagon and therefore I dismissed it as nothing at all. It's like treating RVS content as significant. It always happens; nothing special about it to comment on.

So yeah, that invalidates the rest of your wall, so there's nothing else to reply to, try harder next time fam

[Nosferatu]

nothing. significant. happened. There was no splitting dynamic that occured between the town, nor was there any flagrant events. Nothing. Significant. Happened. I cannot make this more clear.

My response was that no major event had occured that I needed to take a stance on. That doesn't encompass a post I thought was scummy. If you had asked me if there was anything that pinged me, I would have responded differently.

[Nosferatu]

jsyk there's no winning a battle where you're going to tell

me

what

I

meant in a post.

[Nosferatu]

24/25 <--- who states suspicion only to come back literally an hour later to put a vote down?

Why is it scummy that he came back an hour later to vote?

It felt like he forgot that he thought it was scummy or something

As for Nosferatu's vote on Ollie, what I want to know is why you didn't explain your vote and talk to Ollie when he asked you for your thoughts. Why did it take me accusing you of RVS voting before you explained it?

I'm like 90% I've answered this question with

nothing. significant. happened. There was no splitting dynamic that occured between the town, nor was there any flagrant events. Nothing. Significant. Happened. I cannot make this more clear.

My response was that no major event had occured that I needed to take a stance on. That doesn't encompass a post I thought was scummy. If you had asked me if there was anything that pinged me, I would have responded differently.

[Nosferatu]

might've been a good time, but who knows? Cause I didn't.

[Nosferatu]

what's your angle on this question? Once again, if he asked me if I found anything scummy, I would've talked about my vote. If he or anyone had said anything about my vote I would've explained it.

[Nosferatu]

might've been a good time, but who knows? Cause I didn't.

I'm aware you didn't. My question was why?

what's your angle on this question? Once again, if he asked me if I found anything scummy, I would've talked about my vote. If he or anyone had said anything about my vote I would've explained it.

So, if you no one asked you about your vote, you'd have been happy to let people assume it was an RVS vote and move on? You cast a naked vote that could easily be mistaken as an RVS vote. Why does someone need to ask before you explain it? The one reason I could see for putting down naked votes is to get a reaction from the person you voted. You got that. Then you answered his question literally rather than use it an as opening point to scumhunt, ask him if he knows why you are voting him or question him further.

My "angle" with the question is I want to know why you are not pro-active and need to be prompted by others before you expand on your vote.

idk I just don't feel the need to explain every vote I put down the same post I put it down

[Nosferatu]

So what you're telling me is that you actually wanted to know why I voted you but didn't ask?

[Nosferatu]

no, I'm saying that your question did not specifically ask for me to explain my vote and therefore I didn't explain it. It is completely normal for me to put a vote down and not explain it until prompted. In Game Shop Mafia, I put a vote down on davesaz and didn't explain it until I was asked much much later. If you want something from me, ask me directly and don't bullshit me with evidently purposefully vague questions in hope that I would answer what you want me to.

[Nosferatu]

to you and to others it might be.

[Nosferatu]

and there is no sentence in any of my posts where I assign any sort of boolean value to either your question or my answer.

[Nosferatu]

I purposely made it that way to give him a chance to comment on the game in general & his vote for me. & he's making out the fault was in my question & not his answer.

This is you. Saying that you purposefully made your question as all-encompassing and open-ended as you could to make me explain my vote on you.

All-encompassing and open-ended is vague.

Yes! He wasn't scum hunting til pressed by you about his vote. he had no interest in pressing me til then despite having a great opportunity to, which I purposely gave him. I got no bite on it.

This is you again, confirming that the question was a purposeful opportunity for me to explain my vote and put pressure on you.

these are two of your posts explaining why your question was purposefully vague in hopes that I would answer what you wanted me to.

[Nosferatu]

For the last time, I didn't think you wanted me to explain my vote on you. When someone asks me what I thought of what's happened so far, I don't think about individual posts, I think about overarching events. And my opinion of said overarching event was that it was nothing special and it was a normal byproduct of the playerbase that we have.

@Nosferatu - how much of the game had you read when you made your first post?

there's no way it was past 40

[Nosferatu]

@Nosferatu - how much of the game had you read when you made your first post?

there's no way it was past 40

Is there a reason you specifically stopped short of reading the three posts before yours?

It can't be past 40 because I didn't reload the page to see the most recent posts. The only posts I would've seen are the ones made before 8:40.

[Nosferatu]

It can't be past 40 because I didn't reload the page to see the most recent posts. The only posts I would've seen are the ones made before 8:40.

Okay, walk me through your timeline. The reason I'm asking is you apparently caught up with the game before you posted but missed MagnaOfIllusion's post calling you out and said that it had nothing to do with the timing of your post which I'm skeptical about.

1. If you opened up the last page before 8:40, that means it took you an hour and twenty-five minutes just to read the last page. Why did it take an unusually long time to read fifteen short posts?

2. You also responded to him by saying that you were posting in other threads. That's actually not true. You made one post in another thread two hours before your first post in the game this morning and your posts before that were last night.

3. How do you remember the exact time that you opened up the last page?

Background knowledge: as with other 15 year olds in the developed world, I go to school. Fortunately, I go to a private school that permits laptops.

1. It didn't take that long, I just know for sure I didn't read anything from before 8:40.

2. This thread was open but I wasn't posting in it. Unless this thread has been open shorter than I think it has.

3. I know that I found this thread at the end of 1st period. Unfortunately, I didn't get the time to read up on it. 2nd period, I have PE. so no laptops. 3rd period I have English, so laptops. That was when I read from 25 to 40, then went back to the previous page, read from 0 to 24, and then voted Ollie.

ofc then the preview edit screen popped up and I could then see the posts after 40, but I just hit submit again because there was nothing I needed to add.

1st period ends at 8:40 so there's no chance I could anything past that before writing my post.

[Nosferatu]

*no chance I could read anything past that

[Nosferatu]

Okay, that's a much more believable answer. What are your reads so far?

kill and KT are probably town

magna might be town

Lowell might be scum sorta iffy on that tho

Ollie is probably scum

[Nosferatu]

Mind explaining the Lowell read? You haven't said anything about him so far.

I'm suspicious of people that come out of nowhere with comments like "x is town" but lowell loves town reading people so I'm iffy.

[Nosferatu]

It surprises me that jmo's vote an hour after his post never set off Nosferatu's scum vote time criteria.

he was prompted by magna.

[Nosferatu]

he's not voting kill?

[Nosferatu]

See this is where you lose me. Because the most damning of the exchange at 22-25 between Bella and Ollie is not that it took him an hour after posting 24 to vote in 25. It’s that he only voted for Creeper at all because Bella repeatedly badgered him about his read. And Nosferatu doesn’t address that element in his 73 at all.

Why is the time delay more damning then what I pointed out?

I actually didn't read it as bella pressuring him to vote tbh

[Nosferatu]

I actually didn't read it as bella pressuring him to vote tbh

Um, ok.

Really though whether Bella said "Hey vote this person" is fairly irrelevant in the process in my mind. Bella repeatedly requested a real reason from Ollie for his suspicion of Creeper. Ollie only voted after giving his reasoning after being badgered. If you think Ollie is scum for waiting an hour to vote (which really a scum-tell as I see it) you have to think the fact that the only reason he gave said reasoning is because of Bella. Which is odd given the back and forth you had with Ollie regarding being questioned about reasoning on players and his general stance on you not giving it.

Do you disagree?

no I see your point, but when I first read page 1, I didn't see their interaction as bella badgering him for an opinion on KT. Especially since it was a 4-post interaction.

"whaddya think about kt"
"suspicious, I'll be mindful of him"
"why"
"his response to lowell was weird"
*hour wait*
~vote~

This feels like a major stretch. You just said they stated a suspicion, so how could they forget that he thought it was scummy within the same post?

oh ya, I forgot 24 and 25 are the same number.

[Nosferatu]

Bellaphant

- Hedging her bets in the little she's posted.

Hedging where?

[Nosferatu]

why would you be worried about being lynched rn lol

[Nosferatu]

why would you be worried about being lynched rn lol

I said I wasn't.

why'd you even mention it tho

[Nosferatu]

Did you think Ollie was scum when you voted him?

[Nosferatu]

>is asked to provide a recent scum game
>gives a game as 3p
:I

[Nosferatu]

What the hell is a backfoot?

[Nosferatu]

I'm asking what you mean by "on the backfoot"?

[Nosferatu]

so I don't get your read on me here? I'm out maneuvered so I'm scum?

I don't see a progression here leading up to your vote. It's out of place and worries me.

[Nosferatu]

I can't fix what you're reading. This is my natural play. I make observations that often don't follow up and eventually I make a case on a player. Sometimes the case proves correct in their response, and other times it doesn't and the cycle repeats.

What could I tell you now? A ton of things. I think Imperium didn't fully believe in my ollie case but voted anyway. I don't believe that you honestly think your vote should be on me. Why? Because you have no case right now. Right now you have a generic statement. The majority of posters here aren't doing anything. So why are you focusing on me out of everyone who isn't ocean and magna is a thought I'm mulling over right about now.

I don't even believe that you're properly reading this slot. You said "early on Ollie began his 1v1 with Nosferatu" but in reality I started it when I called his vote on KT scummy. There was no clear winner in the argument, and the only way Ollie was winning was in post count. 99 was apparently a sign I was on the defense, but it's really not. I said "there's no winning this argument" before he even got a chance to respond to the response I gave to him the post earlier, and at that point there was no outstanding argument he had made that I hadn't adequately answered, and I haven't shifted opinions when brought under fire from them, I maintained the same arguments throughout, and so did Ollie. There was no winner in the bout.

Now in your previous posts, you've been accusing Ocean of jumping in on me and Ollie's 1v1. You're not wrong here, but your presenting this as something scummy, but a scum read on me for "faux-scumhunting" and a scum read on Ocean for opportunistic intervention doesn't make sense, since Ocean was pushing me along with Ollie, so are you suggesting a bussing interaction here? But you're attacking me first but not Ocean. So obviously not. If you thought I was scum with Ocean in this case, I'd think you'd go for Ocean first here, since he was who you were talking to first. But you diverged from your 1v1 with him to start this interaction here.

I guess the real question is here, what are you doing? I think you're just looking for a reason to build a case because you don't have one. If you're not, why you're diverging from your conversation with ocean to vote me with no real backing is an enigma to me.

TL;DR I'm still reading

[Nosferatu]

Now in your previous posts, you've been accusing Ocean of jumping in on me and Ollie's 1v1. You're not wrong here, but your presenting this as something scummy, but a scum read on me for "faux-scumhunting" and a scum read on Ocean for opportunistic intervention doesn't make sense, since Ocean was pushing me along with Ollie, so are you suggesting a bussing interaction here?

I thought it was clear from my back and forth with Ocean that I now feel less confident in that scumread, so you can consider it independent of my scumread on you.

great, but I still fail to see how I'm being scum read by you. Unless you've got a case hidden somewhere I can see that has some concrete reasons laid out that I can respond to other than "recent posts haven't been questions with follow up".

[Nosferatu]

kill pls, you're only voting them because they haven't announced their scum reads

[Nosferatu]

scummy why?

[Nosferatu]

kling fam u gotta read past page 5 when you pump out these read lists

[Nosferatu]

@Mod: KT hasn't posted in 3 days

[Nosferatu]

If you thought I was scum with Ocean in this case, I'd think you'd go for Ocean first here, since he was who you were talking to first. But you diverged from your 1v1 with him to start this interaction here.

You lost me here. What's scummy about "diverging" from his conversation with me to vote you? This reads almost as if you want me and Acryon to continue arguing with each other as opposed to with you. If he thought you and I were mafia together, why do you think he should continue pushing me as opposed to you? Just because he was already talking to me? If so, at what point would you expect him to go after you if he thought you were mafia too?

I think it's weird that he went out of his way to suddenly start talking to me.

[Nosferatu]

Bella was pushing me to push my reads list since it was so fucked up early on. Clearly scum there, how could I have been so blind? We're lynching Bella today tbh.

is this just the only reason why you're scum-reading bella or are the other ones beyond my understanding as I'm not god's gift to this game

Severa has posted recklessly & she doesn't seem to care what anyone thinks. Not reading her as as scum so far. In fact she's been so abrasive that she can go in my town pile. That attitude would be suicidal for scum.

like tbh ^

UNVOTE: ollie

[Nosferatu]

@Ocean I'm still reading .

[Nosferatu]

no I think no one else wants to put the wagon to L-1 because they're afraid of a surprise hammer

[Nosferatu]

Can you order the remainder of your scum-leaning list of {Lowell,Bellaphant} for me? Are they scum together, assuming you are correct about Nosferatu?

1. Bella 2. Lowell. I have no link for them.

I can see a link from me to Lowell but not from me to bella or bella to Lowell

[Nosferatu]

Bellaphant

- Hedging her bets in the little she's posted.

Hedging where?

Also Ollie could you answer this if you haven't done so already?

[Nosferatu]

Can you order the remainder of your scum-leaning list of {Lowell,Bellaphant} for me? Are they scum together, assuming you are correct about Nosferatu?

1. Bella 2. Lowell. I have no link for them.

I can see a link from me to Lowell

Go on then...

dammit I got confused with lowell's posts in my other game with him

[Nosferatu]

Mm, benefit of the doubt is he was waiting for a response from me, but it was super weird. Kt's defensiveness is not something I've seen from them, but I've played with them twice and were an easy mislynch once and a modkill the second time.

One of the votes on him is prolly scum.

If this is the case why aren’t telling us which player that most likely is?

.

I fail to see how this is her hedging.

[Nosferatu]

I don't assign everyone reads and order them in readlists. I focus on a limited amount of people at a time. I haven't given a readlist since I don't usually perceive games like that.

[Nosferatu]

{Ollie, Lowell}

have my interest at the moment

Imperium is a possible addition

[Nosferatu]

actually ollie is leaving my interest

[Nosferatu]

Tell me what you think of Lowell & Imperium then Nos...

& do you have any town leans?

tonally Lowell does not remind me of my earlier game with him (I was scum and he was town)

Imperium I feel acted weird about your slot. He jumped on it pretty quick. Like he voted you, but apparantly found nothing scummy about the exchange with bella. Just thought it was "worthy of observation".

Still entering my sphere of interest so I need to look at that ISO thoroughly before making a conclusion.

Kill and Xisiqo are town to me.

[Nosferatu]

DAY 1 READS
I'll finish Thursday night, guys. There's a storm coming and the power's likely to go out.

What happened to this? It's Tuesday of the following week.

Oh, hell, I forgot all about it.

Sorry.

Finishing now.

Nosferatu - I said that my Day1 play is shit, I'm better on Day3. My Day1 play is light years beyond what Nos has been doing all game. Scum.

fam you haven't done shit

[Nosferatu]

@Imperium which posts are from who, you guys haven't been signing and I haven't played with either of you enough to know your posting behaviours.

[Nosferatu]

I fail to see how this is her hedging.

You do? Please explain why repeatedly saying that there is scum on a wagon but doing nothing in relation to tracking down said scum from their play re: the wagon isn’t hedging against giving actual reads.

I only saw her say there was scum on the kt wagon once, but saying there's scum on a wagon and not identifying scum on the wagon isn't hedging. It's not following through.

[Nosferatu]

^^^ this is a scummy post

doing exactly what he said he would do previously is scummy?

[Nosferatu]

@Imperium which posts are from who, you guys haven't been signing and I haven't played with either of you enough to know your posting behaviours.

We don't sign our posts, but what would knowing whose posts are whose do for your ability to read us?

It's hard reading read progression of hydras when I don't know who is who.

[Nosferatu]

I'm incredibly skeptical of SnarkySnowman putting me as sole confirmed scum with current levels of content from my slot.

Feels like an attempt to generate a counterwagon. CoM flips scum that's my first priority.

I'm incredibly skeptical of the fact that he read the game in less than a half an hour enough to provide a reads list.

I can read at like 8000wpm, it's a cinch to read a <600 post thread in less than 30 mins, but it looks like it's more of a rangerlist than an read list, so I'm more skeptical about the actual depth of the reads.

[Nosferatu]

Nosferatu - I said that my Day1 play is shit, I'm better on Day3. My Day1 play is light years beyond what Nos has been doing all game. Scum.

fam you haven't done shit

And you've done less.

pls elaborate on this. I am extremely curious.

[Nosferatu]

This is what I don't get.

yeah I also hadn't read your post. Get over yourself.

Assuming you just now remembered this game, why throw down an RVS vote as opposed to offer your thoughts on the non-serious content in the thread?

not RVS.

24/25 <--- who states suspicion only to come back literally an hour later to put a vote down? I could understand if it were a few minutes later and you were like "oh ya, I forgot to vote him actually" but no, he calls him tryhard scum, which is like ¿qué? cause like one thing is saying he was to lengthy in his response to a naked vote, (which I don't even get I mean when did post length become alignment-indicative) but another is calling him tryhard scum based on one post.

This is probably the best point in thread so far.

Vote: Ollie

votes ollie here

Lowell, come vote Ollie with me - it's a hell of a lot better vote than the thing you're doing now.

calls for votes on ollie here

@Ollie:

Why did you wait for an hour to vote?

24/25 <--- who states suspicion only to come back literally an hour later to put a vote down?

Why is it scummy that he came back an hour later to vote?

For the record, I don't think that it's scummy he came back an hour later to vote, just worthy of observation.

finds the matter curious here.

It doesn't make sense. If it was a pressure vote, why call for lowell to join in? Or alternatively, why not ask him the question along with your vote, not almost 200 posts later? And if my point was good, it would mean he thought it was scummy or what? Just agh.

I only saw her say there was scum on the kt wagon once, but saying there's scum on a wagon and not identifying scum on the wagon isn't hedging. It's not following through.

Do you normally take this “strict” a language approach to this game. Because it looks like you are stretching so hard to just argue against the point I made. You say it is not following through. But Bella made the statement and despite multiple requests from myself to actually commit to working that angle she has refused. So I find it realistically likely she is more likely to be scum for quite possible not actually believing what she said. Do you disagree?

I do often take a very strict approach as to semantics and syntax in games, but in this particular case it feels like by using the term "hedging" which has a known scummy connotation makes a post look scummier than it would be otherwise.

It's hard reading read progression of hydras when I don't know who is who.

The do what you should do from the start – treat the slot as a single player. Hydra dissonance isn’t something to excuse. Hydras need to coordinate their crap behind the scenes or be prepared to be held to the fire if they contradict each other.

It's still jarring imo

[Nosferatu]

Pretty comfortable calling snarky town. Fine if Nos wants to call me out on that shit again.

His he tonally town, gut read, or what?

[Nosferatu]

Why is no one talking about how severa literally used bargaining to help setup lynches in advance?

From a mafia perspective, that's sealing 4 deaths ez money.

[Nosferatu]

Why is no one talking about how severa literally used bargaining to help setup lynches in advance?

From a mafia perspective, that's sealing 4 deaths ez money.

And from a town perspective, that's sealing the death of someone who you very strongly believe to be mafia ez money.
I don't find it significant.

:I

[Nosferatu]

I want to point out something. The post that follows is from Mafiaception where day two ABR was being heavily scum read, and I argued against the scum read on him as I had him as a decently strong town read. I laid out for one of the players that was scum reading him what my understanding of his game was as I'd played with him in several games in the past year and had not misread him once. This was his response to my description of his play style.

Subject: MAFIACEPTION GAME OVER! Flawless Victory!

I don't think that abr particularly enjoys being scum but I think he would be energized by a scum team he enjoys or respects. Titus would probably be on that list. However, I think he'd be a bit demotivated after his partner got lynched and instead he seems energized.

This is true. I'm impressed by your understanding of my game.

So, he believes I have an understanding of his game. He respects me as a player, and I'm incorrectly scum reading him here and I don't get any response whatsoever? Except that snarky type of this town is collectively bad and will lose the game?

This is my last game, maybe for awhile, maybe forever.

All the emotion and drive I usually pour into mafia has now been divested into making my partner happy. I don't have any energy left for this.

My problem isn't who is scum anymore, it's what will I do next to stay on this epic high before it comes down. I'm learning about who I am and what I like doing every single day, it's wonderfully fulfilling. It took me a long time to get my mafia game to a place where I was comfortable. Now I'm doing the same with life.

This is so beautiful written, it should be turned into a song, or some country's anthem. Sorry to say I am reading you as scum too at this point. It would make since for you to want your last game to last as long as possible, but someone has to win.

why the lack of a vote then?

[Nosferatu]

nevermind, that's a particularly obvious answer.

[Nosferatu]

I prefer snarky over CoM, but I'm willing to lynch either at this rate.

[Nosferatu]

so on that note VOTE: Snarky

[Nosferatu]

:v I'll hammer if no objections to waiting

[Nosferatu]

:v I'll hammer if no one wants to wait

grammatically correct ver

[Nosferatu]

So we (sans Imperium) ignored my comment on severa because?

[Nosferatu]

Severa's whole case on how SS shouldn't have a scum read on her is a prime example of why I hate read lists like the one SS provided. I have no idea why these types of readlists have become prominent recently but it seriously needs to stop. Making an ordered list from town to scum with little to no explanations at the time of the read is unhelpful for town and beneficial to scum. If SS had explained his SOLE FUCKING SCUM READ as soon as he declared it, I for one would not be suspecting the severa read to be disingenuous.

The whole fucking idea that it's an ok thing announce reads but not go in depth AT ALL is absolutely trash. I'm not necessarily one to talk seeing as I often make votes and not explain those immediately, but when I suggest a possible lynch on someone, I make damn sure to explain why the hell I'm proposing to do so.

This is why I don't know how to sort SS, because I can't know if he fabricated the read on severa or not because of this shitty new read list meta.

TLDR SS post more so I can tonally read your sorry ass.

[Nosferatu]

I find it discomforting that ocean apparently only now decides to realize that severa was lining up lynches D1.

[Nosferatu]

Nah, more just call you dumb and arrogant and devoid of any achievement to back up your gigantic ego.

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=65700

went 2/3 in scum. went back and forth on last scum

I caught first scum and called last scum. You just pulled the trigger on the last one and deathtunnelled the 2nd.

I outrank you.

[Nosferatu]

yeah nos is a god, i cant dispute that.

As long as you're aware.

[Nosferatu]

I have justification - you've posted very little, you've derailed what I think was a possible route of discussion, which I think would have been productive, and you've avoided giving opinion on anyone other than CoM and now myself, as far as alignment goes. Plus, I see the associative between you and CoM forming, and I think that I could get some information out of your lynch, which I think is more likely to be scum than CoM's.

1. What route of discussion, you never describe it in your ISO
2. This is true, but I also find it odd that you find that a person only giving an opinion on one person, who was in fact the subject of discussion at the time scummy. Wouldn't bringing up someone else have diverted the discussion? Seem s like either way you could present it as scummy.
3. The associative argument is just chianing lynches and CoM already flipped town. But then the you say they aren't of the same alignment? But then you have CoM at a scum-lean?

You're reads are a mess from my point of view.

[Nosferatu]

*your

[Nosferatu]

I knew something was bothering me, just couldn't remember what

[Nosferatu]

VOTE: SS

[Nosferatu]

I fail to see how severa/RC de-railed kts or what you even mean by that.

another question, why did your read on me move up?

[Nosferatu]

On the subject of his scumgame, RC literally claimed cop to get a PR lynched that game, he's fucking nuts and while I've learned to avoid making assumptions when concerning his play, I really doubt he'd simply pit two town members against each other or have someone take the fall for a mislynch. From my experience, RC likes to use mind games and turn assumptions about what is likely town against you. He's manipulative of ideas and thoughts, but not actions from what I know of him.

[Nosferatu]

MoI are you like visually impaired?

* Bellaphant - Scumlean

* SeshatX Severa RadiantCowbells - Town

* KainTepes Jim Heuristically_Alone Ranger - Town
*

jmo16mla

SnarkySnowman - Town
* MagnaofIllusion - Scumlean
* Imperium - Scum
* Lowell - Scum
* Nosferatu - Null
* acryon - Town
* OceanWind - Scummishhhhhhh
* Ollie - Town

[Nosferatu]

* Bellaphant - Scum lean, later posts make me feel town a little more, but information lynches are the best lynches early game.

* SeshatX Severa RadiantCowbells - Townlean, Absolute asshole rn, definitely their town playstyle, but my personal bias makes it hard to townread them

* KainTepes Jim Heuristically_Alone Ranger - lol town duh
*

jmo16mla[/s] SnarkySnowman - town
* MagnaofIllusion - dumbass town
* Imperium - ranger actually brought up a good case against this dude lol. i didnt look hard at him till now cuz i thought he was obvtowning it, but this guy hella pushed CoM lynch.
* Lowell - Scum lean. Ranger is a god
* Nosferatu - inactive lurker town very light so like null town
* acryon - he needs to get a closer look at him.
* OceanWind - townlean
* Ollie - townlean

[Nosferatu]

if ranger is mastin why are their readlists different?????

[Nosferatu]

kill if you're sheeping ranger why are you not voting SS
he's not doing shit but saying "RC is still scum guyz" while still not answering why
is he this fucking bad in your experience?

[Nosferatu]

I do get mislynched often.

rn it looks like you're not even trying

[Nosferatu]

i.e. "Ollie, Imperium, Ocean let's derail the wagon on the one person who is beyond a shadow of a doubt not town focused and whose only defense by others is that he's probably just a VI"

sounds dumb when you put it that way huh

ocean fam why is Ranger scummier than SS. Unless I just don't remember you saying something of that nature, and if so pls link.

[Nosferatu]

"I already gave some of the highlights in what I see in SnarkySnowman, but for Imperium, for a start, their posting simply hasn't felt town for the majority of the game. It was vaguely townish-looking initially, enough that I was giving them a pass and looking elsewhere, but it was not something where I could instantly view them and go, "town". Then, you get Imperium's strong push on CoM, over the push on SnarkySnowman. This in spite of how SnarkySnowman's predecessor was a scumread of theirs. Once SnarkySnowman came in, suddenly, without them stating a read change, they refuse to support the wagon despite earlier having driven the wagon. This was also the time where interest in lynching SnarkySnowman came. So, in short: they were pushing the slot when nobody was interested (distancing), but once interest formed, they went elsewhere."

yeah no explanation, no real depth whatsoever.

[Nosferatu]

ok I see your point on the Imperium read. Do you feel the same about the Snarky read?

[Nosferatu]

Also a short definition on depth for future reference would be great.

[Nosferatu]

yeah I don't have experience with lowell. Especially not because of the game I just finished with him.

[Nosferatu]

One game is not enough experience to determine if someone loves to do something in most instances. So are you an alt?

no. I have an unfinished game with him too, but I can't go into that.

[Nosferatu]

speaking of lowell why hasn't he been force replaced or something? He only posts every 2 days or so and doesn't do anything.

[Nosferatu]

I haven't defended lowell this game. I only said he gives town reads often.

[Nosferatu]

Okay, that's a much more believable answer. What are your reads so far?

kill and KT are probably town

magna might be town

Lowell might be scum sorta iffy on that tho

Ollie is probably scum

Mind explaining the Lowell read? You haven't said anything about him so far.

I'm suspicious of people that come out of nowhere with comments like "x is town" but lowell loves town reading people so I'm iffy.

I haven't defended lowell this game. I only said he gives town reads often.

That sounds like nonsense, especially given the context.

Not really. Can't see a defense here. More like hedging actually.

[Nosferatu]

null-scum.

[Nosferatu]

Yeah, I just skimmed through Lowell's ISO. I'm content voting here until I am fully caught up. My biggest concern is that KTS and Nosferatu are both acting very weird about this, but I cannot get ahead of myself.

VOTE: Lowell

what is up with the level of lack of comprehension here? I mention lowell rarely, and the only post of me talking about him is me saying he's not tonally the same as my last scum-game with him, and that I was feeling suspicious about him giving town reads so frequently, but lowell does tend to do that sometimes.

It really feels like you're reaching to tie me in with lowell here. Like scum preparing to bus and then bring a few townies down with fake associations.

[Nosferatu]

based on my theory, that last one would be lowell

[Nosferatu]

Virtue may I ask who you're an alt of?

RC is still scum, I'm re-thinking the bellephant slot. Imperium and Ocean are still scumreads.

Do you have associatives to any of those scumreads

[Nosferatu]

Yeah, I just skimmed through Lowell's ISO. I'm content voting here until I am fully caught up. My biggest concern is that KTS and Nosferatu are both acting very weird about this, but I cannot get ahead of myself.

VOTE: Lowell

what is up with the level of lack of comprehension here? I mention lowell rarely, and the only post of me talking about him is me saying he's not tonally the same as my last scum-game with him, and that I was feeling suspicious about him giving town reads so frequently, but lowell does tend to do that sometimes.

It really feels like you're reaching to tie me in with lowell here. Like scum preparing to bus and then bring a few townies down with fake associations.

You can play semantic games all you want to with my definition of weird but your "hedging" or my view of it as a soft defense (yeah he's scummy but look at this over here), the relationship is weird. If you think Lowell's scum, you should vote him. Rather, it looks like you're just coming up with reasons to agree with everyone here. Where's the hunting? The critical analysis I'm used to you from you?

I don't understand. How is my relationship with lowell weird?

[Nosferatu]

Yeah, I just skimmed through Lowell's ISO. I'm content voting here until I am fully caught up. My biggest concern is that KTS and Nosferatu are both acting very weird about this, but I cannot get ahead of myself.

VOTE: Lowell

what is up with the level of lack of comprehension here? I mention lowell rarely, and the only post of me talking about him is me saying he's not tonally the same as my last scum-game with him, and that I was feeling suspicious about him giving town reads so frequently, but lowell does tend to do that sometimes.

It really feels like you're reaching to tie me in with lowell here. Like scum preparing to bus and then bring a few townies down with fake associations.

You can play semantic games all you want to with my definition of weird but your "hedging" or my view of it as a soft defense (yeah he's scummy but look at this over here), the relationship is weird. If you think Lowell's scum, you should vote him. Rather, it looks like you're just coming up with reasons to agree with everyone here. Where's the hunting? The critical analysis I'm used to you from you?

I don't understand. How is my relationship with lowell weird?

Your "hedging" which I still maintain is a weak defense is wierd. If you think he's scum, you should vote him without caring about how you'll be perceived. It's a wierd relationship to have someone as a scumread to but to always essentially say he's scum yahhh butttt he kinda looks townie over here.

I didn't say I was scum reading him. I said I would be paying attention to him.

[Nosferatu]

Yeah, I just skimmed through Lowell's ISO. I'm content voting here until I am fully caught up. My biggest concern is that KTS and Nosferatu are both acting very weird about this, but I cannot get ahead of myself.

VOTE: Lowell

what is up with the level of lack of comprehension here? I mention lowell rarely, and the only post of me talking about him is me saying he's not tonally the same as my last scum-game with him, and that I was feeling suspicious about him giving town reads so frequently, but lowell does tend to do that sometimes.

It really feels like you're reaching to tie me in with lowell here. Like scum preparing to bus and then bring a few townies down with fake associations.

You can play semantic games all you want to with my definition of weird but your "hedging" or my view of it as a soft defense (yeah he's scummy but look at this over here), the relationship is weird. If you think Lowell's scum, you should vote him. Rather, it looks like you're just coming up with reasons to agree with everyone here. Where's the hunting? The critical analysis I'm used to you from you?

I don't understand. How is my relationship with lowell weird?

Your "hedging" which I still maintain is a weak defense is wierd. If you think he's scum, you should vote him without caring about how you'll be perceived. It's a wierd relationship to have someone as a scumread to but to always essentially say he's scum yahhh butttt he kinda looks townie over here.

I didn't say I was scum reading him. I said I would be paying attention to him.

What is your read on Lowell then?

null-scum.

In other places you call him a scumlean. Don't sell me that's not a "scumread" or that you said you'd be paying more attention.

when I hedged I didn't have him as scum. I said "lowell might be scum but I'm kinda iffy on that."

[Nosferatu]

Not really. Can't see a defense here. More like hedging actually.

Why

did

you

hedge

on Lowell Nos?

past-tense, it was almost 13000 posts ago.

He's null-scum now because he hasn't posted enough for me to make a final decision, but if I had to pick an alignment for him, he'd be scum.

[Nosferatu]

Virtue SS Lowell

[Nosferatu]

If RC is scum I'd put my bets on ranger and one of people RC has thrown shade at at some point in time.

[Nosferatu]

How am I supposed to VCA if we don't have scumflip

[Nosferatu]

can't think of a reason to not VOTE: Virtue :/

[Nosferatu]

tbh I was thinking of what to do this game earlier on since I was sort of hitting a blank and so I was like "why don't I VCA" and I remembered DGB saying optimal VCA time is D3 so I was waiting and no one flipped scum so you're sort of right ranger.

[Nosferatu]

can't think of a reason to not VOTE: Virtue :/

Why are you voting for him?

Tried way too hard to make things seem scummy yesterday.

[Nosferatu]

they are the same person.

[Nosferatu]

alt city

[Nosferatu]

ayy titus

had literally no idea it was you

[Nosferatu]

yeah. What good could VCA possibly be if you just have townflips lol

[Nosferatu]

yeah. What good could VCA possibly be if you just have townflips lol

I get asked to do my VCA all the time with just townflips. You can but it's just pure theorycrafting. And cannot really clear anyone.

Still, saying there's no one here good at VCA and then using a line that's commonly thrown at me kinda made me think you had found my alt rather than being serious.

If you weren't alt provoking me, why make those comments about VCA when we don't have a scum flip?

I haven't done VCA in a while and the game hasn't been panning out as much as I would've liked it to, so VCA would've been a nice option for today.

[Nosferatu]

But why make comments about something you have no intention of doing?

no idea.

[Nosferatu]

PoE makes??

Town:
Ranger
Imperium
Ollie
Killthestory

Everyone else:
Virtue
MagnaofIllusion
Masquerade
Massive
OceanWind

so two of my [everyone else] reads need to get bumped to town.

[Nosferatu]

PoE makes??

Ranger - meta (Blitz 2, Mini 1774)
Imperium - tone
Ollie - made some posts I agreed with, particularly 438 comes to mind
Killthestory - meta (Mini 1774, Mini 1740)

[Nosferatu]

simple sentence reads.

[Nosferatu]

PoE makes??

Ranger - meta (Blitz 2, Mini 1774)
Imperium - tone
Ollie - made some posts I agreed with, particularly 438 comes to mind
Killthestory - meta (Mini 1774, Mini 1740)

Simple sentences on Ranger and Killthestory meta would be nice. Just the highlights. What was the difference in their play as town and as mafia and how have their posts here fit more with their townplay?

What does "tone" even mean in this context?

More examples of Ollie posts you agree with please. That one post I find to be rather null. If Ollie knew Severa was town, that would have been an easy read to make.

Well it's less agree with and more genuine?
this one I really felt he was being honest about.

As for kill and ranger, the tone of their posts is very much like their posts in the games I listed.

As for Imperium, he's just got that townie feel I guess. As I mentioned before, I'm tonal with my town reads, analytical with my scum reads.

[Nosferatu]

If you want something analytical out of me, you shouldn't have looked in my town reads for it.

[Nosferatu]

I didn't specify town reads. I just asked you to explain your reads. It doesn't seem like there's anything behind your townreads other than "they just seem like town" which doesn't make any sense to me because there has to be a reason why their posts made you feel that way.

I don't really buy into "tonal reads" but if you want to want to elaborate on your non-town reads, I'd like to hear them.

when I get a proper scum read I'll make sure to consult you.
UNVOTE:

[Nosferatu]

I come back on Monday and post 1527 and 1529 trying to get more people to join in on Ranger and again showing that the logic behind the Snarky wagon was faulty.

Why didn't you ask about my switch when I made it?

Nope. Homie don't play that. Not even on Christmas.

You take that whole post dedicated to laying out in detail exactly the flow of votes and posts in time and distill one single element to attempt to undermine / discredit the entire post?

Scummy as hell.

VOTE: Oceanwind

so why didn't you ask about the switch when ocean made it? Regardless of whether not he cherrypicked the question, it's still a valid one.

[Nosferatu]

I've lost entire motivation to play due to all the freakishly long posts in this thread. I try to read and I'm reading so much that I'm overflowing.
So here's a small thing and ask me anything and I'll elaborate because I don't know where to start.
I think Magna is town, I think Ocean is scum, I think Nosferatu could be scum as well, I don't know about Ranger it was gut but Jim and alone feel town to me, Ollie is probably town as well, I know Acryon isn't around to answer me about the PL-thing but you know, I always see wine in everything and it would have been a good wifom-defense if Acryon/Massive is idd scum. Imperium I;m still reading as town though I barely read any of their posts. Please add tl'dr and then delete everything you wrote before that ty. Titus might be town too. Those I didn't name haven;t made enough of an impression either way to get stuck into my head and are therefor null.

VOTE: Oceanwind

why are you on the ocean wind wagon?

[Nosferatu]

@Titus from your ISO your suspects have been {Nos, kts, lowell, oceanwind}. Assuming you are right about 3 of those reads, could you have 3 scumteams you can imagine in order of confidence?

[Nosferatu]

HOLY FUCK THIS GAME DOESNT MATTER ANYMORE THIS GIRL THAT IVE LIKED FOR SO LONG AND SHES HOT AND SHIT, WELL I ASKED HER OUT AND SHE SAID YES OMG

Congrats!

Btw, I read the last couple of pages, almost in their entirety, but I kind-of wish I hadn't. Walls are...walls. I think OceanWind is scum; I think Masquerade is scum. I'm absolutely sure MagnaofIllusion is town and Imperium is town. I still need to reread, but that will happen later when I've recuperated from the wallfest.

You've already said this before. What about the other reads you were reconsidering; Massive/acryon, Lowell/Masquerade, Ollie?

[Nosferatu]

why are you on the ocean wind wagon?

Because I think he's scum.

why.

[Nosferatu]

@Nosferatu: Because I didn't like his responses to Magna and his questions to me seemed weird. What did you think of the responses I made and how Ocean reacted to those?

The reaction to your response was a bit odd, but the questions I don't see anything wrong with.

[Nosferatu]

Why does it matter?

[Nosferatu]

Oh yeah, when I get bored and ask people to show they're actually trying to figure out the game I'm scum handing out busy work but when I don't do anything I'm scum lurking. You're fucking scum as all hell.

[Nosferatu]

Oh yeah, when I get bored and ask people to show they're actually trying to figure out the game I'm scum handing out busy work but when I don't do anything I'm scum lurking. You're fucking scum as all hell.

Nope. You don't get to throw up your hands and act outraged when I called that request busy work. Because asking someone to arrange their scum reads in a ranking to teams isn't going to show that they are trying to figure out the game. Asking them to demonstrate why their scum reads are scum would allow them to demonstrate that. Basically you are asking someone to rank possible teams before a single scum player has flipped. Pre-flip full team analysis is pointless and distracting.

But why don't you demonstrate with the analytical process you claimed you use for your scum reads your Top three and why. And no, single sentence fluff answers aren't acceptable. I want to see you are trying to figure out this game.

I'm not asking her to arrange her scum reads in a ranking, I'm asking her to look for associations between them so she can have a probably scum read. If she's scum she'll just throw them together, and when I look at who she has ranked #1 I can look in ISO and look to see if there are any actual associatives. Despite the fact that the fact that pre-flip analysis isn't the most effective method to scumhunting, most people do it anyway when their own top scum read has been lynched, so if someone is asked to form associatives when they're town, most likely, they will already have a possible scum team in mind. The point of ranking them is so that she can evaluate which is more likely than the other, and actually look at her scum reads in ISO if she's town. The request was to sort her properly because I don't have much to go off of based on how many posts she's had.

I'm not going to waste my time explaining my scum reads to some one who just has a weak-ass case that they need to build. Your scum read on me is a simple sentence read. "Nos has been coasting for the past two days and assigned busy work". Is just about everything you have on me. If I gave my scumreads right now, I'm confident you wouldn't actually analyze them, but just cherry pick and attack my scum reads and claim I'm not reading the game when I am.

[Nosferatu]

Nosferatu’s latest bout of “Why is Ocean scum” is interesting given the possible relational links it establishes.

I actually forgot about this one earlier, but this is a misconstruction of my questions to Ocean. I didn't have the best impression of Lowell this game, and I articulated that actually yesterday under Titus's questioning when he asked where I would assign him on my readlist. Masquerade jumped on to the wagon with little to no foreshadowing whatsoever. He just read the exchange, and with no comments said "I think Magna is town, I think Ocean is scum". Now I know the exchange probably wasn't properly read, since Masquerade already said he doesn't actually read wallposts and is just skimming them at this point. I wanted to see if he actually genuinely believed that Ocean was scum and why. I don't actually care why people think Ocean is scum.

[Nosferatu]

I look forward to telling you why it's shit

[Nosferatu]

he says while not voting

[Nosferatu]

reading up

How's this going
UNVOTE: Titus

[Nosferatu]

nvm I didn't need to do that

[Nosferatu]

Why are you inserting yourself in another person's line of questioning?

Wait--

[Nosferatu]

tfw the meme of me having a hedged read on lowell is alive and well

Like I said I was suspicious of him once and had a nullscum read ever since but he just lurked so there was nothing alignment indicative in his posts so I couldn't properly say he was scum. Titus why are you keeping this meme going?

[Nosferatu]

[*]The fourth, Titus, was because Titus is playing her scum game, and I knew it was her even when she was Virtue.

Really? The reason why I'm not completely sold on the slot now that she's revealed as Titus was that I didn't feel she was playing her scum game. Could you elaborate pls?

[Nosferatu]

VOTE: No Lynch
I'll assume MoI isn't lying because no one is CCing.

[Nosferatu]

VOTE: No Lynch

My point holds, even with a doctor instead of a roleblocker. No-lynching is a pro-scum move. What do we gain from another death? Lylo instead of mylo, with a player probably very unlikely to be lynched in the first place dead. Not an ideal state. What do we gain if nobody dies? Wifom on whether it was a kill protected, a kill blocked, or scum deliberately no-killing. Not an ideal state.

What do we gain from lynching? If we lynch incorrectly and a kill is stopped, we get an extra lynch, lylo instead of mylo, with the knowledge that scum thought they had won and now are at a severe disadvantage. Ideal state. If we lynch correctly and a kill is stopped, we get a scum flip, AND we're not in lylo, or even mylo. We're a day ahead, with a mislynch to spare. Ideal state. If we lynch correctly and no kill is stopped, we'll still be in mylo tomorrow, but we'll have a scum flip and the info from the nightkilled player having been town. Still an ideal state.

The

only

scenario in which lynching today ends in a scum win is if we lynch incorrectly

and

the scum kill is not stopped. Ergo, we're lynching today.[/quote]
the actual correct scenario is to no lynch without posting at all so scum doesn't have more information on who to kill but you guys fucked that over already. Lynching will result in your lynch. I don't have any suggestions on who to lynch today. I'm completely stumped. All my scum reads have been off so far. I don't have faith in us lynching scum or correctly stopping a kill so I'm playing it safe and hoping the kill will narrow something down for me.

[Nosferatu]

VOTE: No Lynch

My point holds, even with a doctor instead of a roleblocker. No-lynching is a pro-scum move. What do we gain from another death? Lylo instead of mylo, with a player probably very unlikely to be lynched in the first place dead. Not an ideal state. What do we gain if nobody dies? Wifom on whether it was a kill protected, a kill blocked, or scum deliberately no-killing. Not an ideal state.

What do we gain from lynching? If we lynch incorrectly and a kill is stopped, we get an extra lynch, lylo instead of mylo, with the knowledge that scum thought they had won and now are at a severe disadvantage. Ideal state. If we lynch correctly and a kill is stopped, we get a scum flip, AND we're not in lylo, or even mylo. We're a day ahead, with a mislynch to spare. Ideal state. If we lynch correctly and no kill is stopped, we'll still be in mylo tomorrow, but we'll have a scum flip and the info from the nightkilled player having been town. Still an ideal state.

The

only

scenario in which lynching today ends in a scum win is if we lynch incorrectly

and

the scum kill is not stopped. Ergo, we're lynching today.

the actual correct scenario is to no lynch without posting at all so scum doesn't have more information on who to kill but you guys fucked that over already. Lynching will result in your lynch. I don't have any suggestions on who to lynch today. I'm completely stumped. All my scum reads have been off so far. I don't have faith in us lynching scum or correctly stopping a kill so I'm playing it safe and hoping the kill will narrow something down for me.

[Nosferatu]

VOTE: No Lynch
I'll assume MoI isn't lying because no one is CCing.

yeah

[Nosferatu]

My point is. You have zero experience with me as scum. Yet when Ranger states this is my scumgame with very little backing it up, you're posturing based off differences between my alleged town and scum meta. You shouldn't have any foundation to suggest a meta read. Even now, your read is very simplified. It reads as if Someone (my bet is on Ranger) told you to find examples of Titus being nice and argue it's sucking up.

Even now, you ignored the context you asked me to provide you. There's a difference between being a civil human being and avoiding confrontation Ollie. You're attempting to paint them in the same brush.

scum don't have daychat?

[Nosferatu]

I mean I already knew that but ok

[Nosferatu]

Mafia Goon role PM

Hello <insert player name here>, you are a

Mafia Goon

. Your scum mates are <insert mafia team mate 1 name here> and <insert mafia team mate 2 name here>.

actions: during the day, you can vote to decide who is lynched.

During the night

, you can talk amongst yourselves to decide who to kill that night

. The mafia thread is located <insert mafia PT here>.
win condition: you win when the town is eliminated or nothing can stop that from happening.

The game thread is located <insert link to game thread here>. Please confirm by responding with your role.

I was pointing out how it's pretty hard for ranger to coach ollie without daychat. Didn't want titus to keep operating on faulty logic.

[Nosferatu]

@ MoI

Do you have any other experience besides this game (obviously completed games), with Kill?

I was not kidding about having trouble reading trolls, I do better with logical folk who build cases n such.

I'm not MoI, but I've played with kill in 2 completed games and I've developed an idea of how he plays. People label kill as a shitposter, but that's not completely true. In the games I've played with him, he's an extremely hyper-aggressive scumhunter with a derisive attitude when talking to pretty much everyone. In my first game with him, and while I caught all of the scum, he did also drive lynches in my absence. In our other game, he took a different approach and relied on his reads and toned down is aggressive pushes for shitposts with occasional reads.

Now in this game he's not nearly as hyper-aggressive as he was in our first game and is similar to Mini 1774. At this point I wouldn't be surprised if he were scum this game since his saving grace in 1774 was his reads which were extremely on point. Before I was townreading him because I expected lowell to flip scum, but after that and the fact that kill has not been right at all and hasn't been pressuring for us to drive any lynch, I could really go either way on him.

[Nosferatu]

f i n d s c u m

[Nosferatu]

who's the last???

[Nosferatu]

I mean I felt Virtue was scum, but the last time I played with Titus-scum, she took over the thread pretty quickly upon replacing in, which she hasn't done here, which has made me doubt the read I had on the slot.

[Nosferatu]

Ranger's hammer however with the sole purpose of self preservation was also extremely anti-town and I have no qualms over the desire to lynch that.

[Nosferatu]

I'm finding it difficult to develop townreads at this point. Even ollie who seemed town is retrospectively kind of scummy. Whenever an argument is presented to him, the way that he diminishes its validity with deprecation gives me a real bad feeling. OW slot never gave me any feeling towards one alignment or the other and Rachmarie isn't helping. Imperium doesn't seem scummy but tbh I'm not actually reading her posts in depth because of the formatting. MoI is the only one who I could say is probably town.

[Nosferatu]

massive and xisi kills don't make sense smh

VCA is unreliable without a scumflip

NKA doesn't yield anything since I can't make sense of two of them

Everyone is hard to read

this game is fucking with me

[Nosferatu]

Way to not help in that process whatsoever

[Nosferatu]

titus and ranger

well thats definitely a hard one since gut tells me titus is town, but ranger is def scum so hes gotta be todays lynch

titus is very hard to read for me honestly.

For like the 50th time scum distancing themselves from their own reads.

Obv obv obv

massive and xisi kills don't make sense smh

VCA is unreliable without a scumflip

NKA doesn't yield anything since I can't make sense of two of them

Everyone is hard to read

this game is fucking with me

So you just can’t even make reads on Day 4 after all that has gone on? Are you really this bad at being Town or are you scum who has slid under the radar all game?

>ignores series of posts on why I'm not confident in my reads at this point
>proceeds to cherry pick a post and accuse me of being scum based on it
return to sender fam how fucking bad are you?

[Nosferatu]

>ignores series of posts on why I'm not confident in my reads at this point
>proceeds to cherry pick a post and accuse me of being scum based on it
return to sender fam how fucking bad are you?

Nope nope nope. Sorry, do not pass go do not collect $200.

You haven't had a read that you've pushed as scum all game. For three days you've slid by under the radar without doing so. And you are trying to do so again today.

I don't give a fuck about your AtE posts about "This game is HARD". Either you are too incompetent to actually make a scum read BY DAY 4 or you are scum and are working your angle to a tee. There's enough other scummy players in the game I can't tell which for certain

But the speed at which you replied to this with some pointless "You can't read you suck" reads to me that you are more likely to be the later who is monitoring the thread but specifically not contributing.

I fucking scumread everyone except for you and Imperium

at this point I'm just trying to figure out which 2 I'm scum reading incorrectly. By no lynching today, I'm hoping that by one of you fuckers dying, my job will be that much easier. By no means do I not have a scum read and if you think I've skirted past the entire game without having any opinions you are dead fucking wrong.

[Nosferatu]

I fucking scumread everyone except for you and Imperium

at this point I'm just trying to figure out which 2 I'm scum reading incorrectly.

By no lynching today, I'm hoping that by one of you fuckers dying, my job will be that much easier

. By no means do I not have a scum read and if you think I've skirted past the entire game without having any opinions you are dead fucking wrong.

The bolded makes exactly zero sense - you think one of your many scum reads would die over the players you are Town reading?

Point to me where you've made a scum read and pushed it this game. I'd love to see that post from your perspective.

If you or imperium dies, well I'm in the same position as before, but as you can see I include the keyword hope*.

*hope(verb): to desire with expectation of obtainment; to wish for a particular event that one considers possible;

Archaic

to have confidence or trust.

I pushed SS. I asked him questions about his reads and with that I decided he was scum, and so I kept my vote on him.

VOTE: Ranger

This day is just confusing the shit out of me, ruining my reads. I want a night phase to reread to see if I can make sense of this.

Why hasn't anyone commented on this? I'm sure a night phase isn't needed to re-read.

[Nosferatu]

Why hasn't anyone commented on this? I'm sure a night phase isn't needed to re-read.

What do you think there is to comment on? You yourself are saying you can’t untangle the knots in thread and want to No Lynch to see what shakes out. Titus is effectively saying the same thing except for lynching Ranger instead of No Lynching.

If you or imperium dies, well I'm in the same position as before, but as you can see I include the keyword hope*.

*hope(verb): to desire with expectation of obtainment; to wish for a particular event that one considers possible; Archaic to have confidence or trust.

I pushed SS. I asked him questions about his reads and with that I decided he was scum, and so I kept my vote on him.

I think there is an old expression about filling hands with hope and crap that applies.

Oh … you are wanting to take credit for your push on an Town player that I called Town all day and want me to see that as solid scum-hunting from you. In fact …

i.e. "Ollie, Imperium, Ocean let's derail the wagon on the one person who is beyond a shadow of a doubt not town focused and whose only defense by others is that he's probably just a VI"

sounds dumb when you put it that way huh

ocean fam why is Ranger scummier than SS. Unless I just don't remember you saying something of that nature, and if so pls link.

That reminds me where you called out players for trying to get a wagon going on Ranger and pushed Snarky as obv-scum.

So does this now sound really dumb or scummy as hell? Need to decide.

1. Me having to resort to no lynching is one thing, but Titus having to is something else. I expect more. Call it burden of proficiency, but I expect more from town Titus than "let's lynch someone in MyLo and I'll read during the night."
2. SS was scummy as shit and no one can convince me that he was anything but. His reads were a mess, he tunnelled a slot, contributed absolutely nothing, jumped from his apparant major scum read to the max wagon CoM (whom on the subject of townreads on dead players I town read), and in the face of his own lynch just screamed "RC is scum". The only reason people were townreading him was because of his reputation of being a VI. I did not view his actions as VI behaviour.
3. I didn't call Ocean out for being on Rangers wagon; I didn't know the case, I was townreading Ranger at the time, and I couldn't see why anyone could possibly not want to lynch SS.
4. If we're counting advertising SS's lynch as scummy/dumb, kill is obv town for adamantly defending SS more than probably anyone else.

[Nosferatu]

2. SS was scummy as shit and no one can convince me that he was anything but. His reads were a mess, he tunnelled a slot, contributed absolutely nothing, jumped from his apparant major scum read to the max wagon CoM (whom on the subject of townreads on dead players I town read), and in the face of his own lynch just screamed "RC is scum". The only reason people were townreading him was because of his reputation of being a VI. I did not view his actions as VI behaviour.

4. If we're counting advertising SS's lynch as scummy/dumb, kill is obv town for adamantly defending SS more than probably anyone else.

I'm calling bullshit on both of these points. I spent many a post explaining why Snarky's play didn't come from a scum point of view. Especially given the tenactity he clung to his Radiant scum read. You can ignore that to keep telling yourself you had
a good read on the slot. You didn't. And the fact he is such low hanging fruit and he is the case you provided as your evidence of scum-hunting weighs heavily on my read on your slot.

Sorry that I don't see screaming "x is scum" over and over with no reasoning whatsoever is indicative of being a "weak player". Your "townread" (mind you, you yourself explicitly stated that you did not town read Snarky, you just didn't see as scum) on Snarky was based on him decided on him "zeroing in on Severa" upon replacing in and "continuing to do so after the Radiant replace in".

SS scumread RC because of "de-railing kts", only gave opinions on one slot (CoM), tone, and motivation that is never explained.

I asked SS how RC derailed kill. He said he would provide some quotes and never did.

Snarky almost exclusively talked about RC and my criticism of his logic on the matter was deflected.

tone pretty much can't be analyzed, especially without any examples, and motivation was once again never explained.

I looked that ISO up and down and didn't see a speck of town, and apparently you didn't either, I just made the logical goddamn decision and sorted him as scum, while you called him literally "not a scum-read". You didn't see him realistically doing what he did as scum, but at the same time he was a weak player. Why he was exclusively weak as town and not scum is a mystery to me. Your snarky "read" (if you even want to call it that) was total shit, so if you want to delude yourself that you correctly read him while shitting on everyone who scum read him, I'm here to tell you your read was just as fucking garbage as everyone else's.

Also - obv Town don't hammer players they say are Town because they are bored. VIs do that.

I really don't see the point you're making here. Not only have you brought in a point other than the one I was making, but you also imply that kill is a VI (town). I'm pointing out the inconsistency between saying I'm scummy for pushing SS as obv-scum while saying kill is obvscum while he defended SS the most out of the entire playerlist. In no way did I call him obvtown and literally last page I outed my opinion on why I'm doubting his slot. So if you're implying I think kill is obv town you're very wrong. I don't have to tell you why I'm confused by you calling kill a VI

and the sad thing is, thanks to your unopposed jk claim, your stupid as shit antics will go unpunished, as you are basically conf town.

Imperium haven't posted in over 4 days, were they on V/LA or what?

I'm pretty sure Tammy is going through some sort of difficulty, and also reasonably certain Nacho's had some restriction this whole game.

You clearly aren’t.

RadiantCowbell's combined iso is 154 very long posts. I'm sure I could find something if I read every one in detail, but I don't have that amount of willpower. massive has 16 posts. All I see is a willingness to work with me, willingness to work with RachMarie's slot, lack of desire to lynch me, suspicion on Titus, maybe some suspicion on you, possible suspicion on Killthestory, and townreading Imperium, nothing conclusive. He wasn't obviously town, I don't see any posts that could be interpreted as PR crumbs (though to be fair I'd also need to check his predecessor there), if massive has a reputation I'm unaware of it, so if it's anything, it'd be {accurate reads, status quo, not likely protect}. That's the best I've got.

For Xisi, I've isoed him many times. The only things I see are a townread on Imperium and a scumread on Tituslot, maybe one on Killthestory. He wasn't obviously town, I don't see how he could be seen as a PR (though I'd again need to check his predecessor to be sure), if Xisiqomelir has a reputation I'm unaware of it, there's not much there in regards to relevant reads, so all I've got there is {status quo, not likely protect}.

I've been going over Xisi's since D3, maybe even late D2. Every time, trying to take something from it, every time, finding nothing definitive. Feel free to iso the dead yourself and tell me what I missed.

Probably about time for you to make one of your patented “Goodbye messages to your partners” I’ve seen before.

Literally never done this in any completed game. Best not to talk about that further, though you should probably try reading games instead of skimming them.

If you're not getting anything out of this, you should probably stop doing that and try something else.

[Nosferatu]

@MoI: fyi "many a post on why snarky is town" is actually just one.

@Nosferatu, Are you claiming to be townreading Ranger or something? At some point we're going to lynch Ranger if we're all convinced she's scum. This thread is exhausting as hell. Lynching obvscum AND forcing scum to make the next move is a win in my book. Your no lynching just delays the inevitable. A no lynch should be done when in mylo + there is no obvious scum or obvious unprotected town.

It's MyLo and I'm not absolutely-beyond-a-shadow-of-a-doubt sure Ranger is scum. Hence the decision to no lynch.

[Nosferatu]

Up until yesterday, she was town. Now, she's a coin toss. One with a scummy weighted side.

[Nosferatu]

Well that's cause VCA without a town flip is a crap shoot :/

[Nosferatu]

Did you actually forget that you didn't actually have a read on him? Like you didn't read him as town, you just didn't think he would do what he did as scum. Like this is not an issue of me hating on you for not wanting to lynch SS, this is me showing you thought was put into my SS read, and that I'm neither garbage nor scum.

[Nosferatu]

Let’s be clear. It isn’t really a Townread per-se… at least in the same way my Snarky read is not a Townread. It is a lack of Scum-read. Which is essentially the same but different. Imperium is a Town-read of mine. I see Town motivations in Imperium’s play. I simply see a lack of realistic scum motivations in Snarky / Radiant

Your read on snarky. This is not selective quoting, snipping out random key words bullshit, this is you, honest to Jesus suffering Christ hedging on snarky. You explicitly said it wasn't a Townread I am literally just relaying your posts back to you. If you think this is me reducing your post quality through disingenuous means, it's not. I think your read on my is half conf bias and half hypocrisy. I saw no town motivation in his posts. Neither did you. You say this here. Why is it that me scum reading him because of it is bad play compared to you LITERALLY HEDGING?? Like your stances do not pass muster when closely examined.

Oh … you are wanting to take credit for your push on an Town player that I called Town all day and want me to see that as solid scum-hunting from you. In fact …

i.e. "Ollie, Imperium, Ocean let's derail the wagon on the one person who is beyond a shadow of a doubt not town focused and whose only defense by others is that he's probably just a VI"

sounds dumb when you put it that way huh

ocean fam why is Ranger scummier than SS. Unless I just don't remember you saying something of that nature, and if so pls link.

That reminds me where you called out players for trying to get a wagon going on Ranger and pushed Snarky as obv-scum.

I'm scum for trying to convince you that I was actually scum hunting and evaluated SS as scum. Why? Snarky flipped town. Yet no one on this town has found scum and lynched it. So what the hell do you want?

You're also misrepresenting YOUR SELF. You did NOT call snarky town all day. You did NOT spent multiple posts detailing why he didn't have scum motivation. You made one post saying his pushes didn't make sense from a scum perspective, despite the fact that there is virtually no reason why he can't be bad scum and be bad town.

I can't argue against idiocy but I can damn well try lol

[Nosferatu]

Wow you're bad. Do whatever the fuck you want, the only thing that's gonna teach you is failure.

VOTE: Ranger
I'll sheep you since you're god or whatever.

[Nosferatu]

Wow you're bad. Do whatever the fuck you want, the only thing that's gonna teach you is failure.

VOTE: Ranger
I'll sheep you since you're god or whatever.

When your only response is to throw rhetoric ... I don't know what to tell you ...

That's not rhetoric. I'm not trying to persuade you to do anything. It's like you've got a buzzword generator that spits out random words for you to use.

[Nosferatu]

inb4 imperium/ollie/rach scumteam sweep

[Nosferatu]

UNVOTE: Ranger

[Nosferatu]

Team is Kill + Titus + [rach, ollie]

Or Ranger is scum.

With this outline pretty sure I'm cool no lynching.
VOTE: No Lynch

[Nosferatu]

if ranger is town, hasn't been lynched because two scum are already on the wagon and the third is ready to hammer, you and Titus are the only non-town people on the wagon. Assuming Ranger, Imperium and, MoI are town, the last scum must be between rach and ollie. This is a perfectly logical conclusion. Keep in mind that "Or Ranger is scum" means that entire team theory is moot. What's scummy about it.

[Nosferatu]

I'll be staying on no lynch for the rest of the day, provided Ranger does not outright scumclaim or no one can hammer.

[Nosferatu]

This is the part where, if I was scum, I'd self-hammer to just end the day.
I'm not.
VOTE: Killthestory.

you're just raring to prove yourself town.

[Nosferatu]

YAY scum lynch and no kills it is a great day.

Moving along to do ISO of Ranger for interactions plus some VCA now that we have a scum flip.

just eliminate every one she pushes as scum since she never busses.

[Nosferatu]

if kill is doc, scum team is almost certainly ollie and rach. If imperium is scum I swear to jesus I'll take every game uber seriously and analyse everything to a t to overcome this shame.

which to lynch first?

[Nosferatu]

if kill is doc, scum team is almost certainly ollie and rach. If imperium is scum I swear to jesus I'll take every game uber seriously and analyse everything to a t to overcome this shame.

which to lynch first?

If kill is doc, why wouldn't you doubt me given I have strongly desired to lynch kill without a CC?

Imperium is implied scum if Kill is?

So why are you sure I am town?

What do you actually think of Kil?

1. In fact right after I made that post I realized you were in this game, but ranger was pretty convinced you're scum iirc, and ranger doesn't bus so I figured you were probably town.
2. no?
3. I'm really not.
4. Like yesterday, it's really just a coin flip. I flip between scum and town reading him literally everytime he posts.

if kill is doc, scum team is almost certainly ollie and rach. If imperium is scum I swear to jesus I'll take every game uber seriously and analyse everything to a t to overcome this shame.

Why? & why are you giving Imperium a pass?

Because I townread imperium. That post was literally just PoE (Although I did forget Titus).

[Nosferatu]

@Nos So you found it hard to read Imp without them signing their posts, you were struggling to read them, they haven't started signing their posts since, & you haven't played with them much. I saw nothing that you pointed out what changed your mind about Imp's alignment. But you have a strong town read on them? How have you been able to get over not being able to read them? Can you bring up some posts that made you town read them please. What thoughts were you thinking about their slot that you didn't articulate? I've picked out the relevant posts...

@Imperium which posts are from who, you guys haven't been signing and I haven't played with either of you enough to know your posting behaviours.

We don't sign our posts, but what would knowing whose posts are whose do for your ability to read us?

It's hard reading read progression of hydras when I don't know who is who.

You've brought up more negative stuff than town which is why I need clarification on this...

This is what I don't get.

yeah I also hadn't read your post. Get over yourself.

Assuming you just now remembered this game, why throw down an RVS vote as opposed to offer your thoughts on the non-serious content in the thread?

not RVS.

24/25 <--- who states suspicion only to come back literally an hour later to put a vote down? I could understand if it were a few minutes later and you were like "oh ya, I forgot to vote him actually" but no, he calls him tryhard scum, which is like ¿qué? cause like one thing is saying he was to lengthy in his response to a naked vote, (which I don't even get I mean when did post length become alignment-indicative) but another is calling him tryhard scum based on one post.

This is probably the best point in thread so far.

Vote: Ollie

votes ollie here

Lowell, come vote Ollie with me - it's a hell of a lot better vote than the thing you're doing now.

calls for votes on ollie here

@Ollie:

Why did you wait for an hour to vote?

24/25 <--- who states suspicion only to come back literally an hour later to put a vote down?

Why is it scummy that he came back an hour later to vote?

For the record, I don't think that it's scummy he came back an hour later to vote, just worthy of observation.

finds the matter curious here.

It doesn't make sense. If it was a pressure vote, why call for lowell to join in? Or alternatively, why not ask him the question along with your vote, not almost 200 posts later? And if my point was good, it would mean he thought it was scummy or what? Just agh.

I only saw her say there was scum on the kt wagon once, but saying there's scum on a wagon and not identifying scum on the wagon isn't hedging. It's not following through.

Do you normally take this “strict” a language approach to this game. Because it looks like you are stretching so hard to just argue against the point I made. You say it is not following through. But Bella made the statement and despite multiple requests from myself to actually commit to working that angle she has refused. So I find it realistically likely she is more likely to be scum for quite possible not actually believing what she said. Do you disagree?

I do often take a very strict approach as to semantics and syntax in games, but in this particular case it feels like by using the term "hedging" which has a known scummy connotation makes a post look scummier than it would be otherwise.

It's hard reading read progression of hydras when I don't know who is who.

The do what you should do from the start – treat the slot as a single player. Hydra dissonance isn’t something to excuse. Hydras need to coordinate their crap behind the scenes or be prepared to be held to the fire if they contradict each other.

It's still jarring imo

Imperium is basically just for most of this game as she's admitted. So the fact that they don't sign their posts is pretty irrelevant at this point. I could also probably point out the posts that weren't Tammy after playing for so long in this game. The issue with hydras not signing is more of an accuracy issue than a difficulty issue.

inb4 imperium/ollie/rach scumteam sweep

Was this a serious comment? If so why did you think that?

After ISOing you I get the impression you were town reading Ranger until the hammer & yesterday. Is that true?

this coulda been communication with a scum team member...

If you're not getting anything out of this, you should probably stop doing that and try something else.

Was up until the masque hammer I was townreading Ranger. I can't fix your perceived communication thing. Last time, I coached a team mate though, Titus caught me and my buddy, so I don't think I'd do it again with her here.

[Nosferatu]

Unless you scum read both me and titus; in that case idk what to tell you.

[Nosferatu]

Now, which game are you referring to where I caught you and your buddy?

Blitz 6.

[Nosferatu]

here. Like was literally less than a minute and she caught me.

[Nosferatu]

I think everyone alive has asked for the doc to cc kill. It's almost like kill is the doc. Shocking.




















no seriously doc cc.

FTFY to comply with rule 4-No text encryption, hard-to-read fonts or any other means of hiding text from other players. That normally includes spoilering text.

[Nosferatu]

I'm here.

Not scum btw.

[Nosferatu]

that would be a hammer.

[Nosferatu]

but I only see two town on this wagon.

[Nosferatu]

I mean I'm fine with lynching ollie to remind you guys that he has been scum and me not advocating his lynch was a momentary lapse in judgement, but I just want to get it out there that you're the last one.

[Nosferatu]

@MoI: How does the MoIputer work?

[Nosferatu]

Spoiler: PRs not included

since 9 people have responded, the game shall begin.

vote count

Bellaphant: none
SeshatX: none

KainTepes

: none

jmo16mla

: none
MagnaofIllusion: none
Imperium: none
Killthestory: none

ChurchOfMercy

(hydra, Klingoncelt and Albert B Rampage): none

Lowell

: none
Nosferatu: none

acryon

: none
OceanWind: none
KTthecreeper: none
Ollie: none
With 14 alive, it takes 8 votes to have a lynch.
day 1 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-04-16 19:01:46)

vote count 1.01

Bellaphant (0): none
SeshatX (1):

ChurchOfMercy

KainTepes

(0): none

jmo16mla

(1): Ollie
MagnaofIllusion (1): Imperium
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (0): none

ChurchOfMercy

(hydra, Klingoncelt and Albert B Rampage) (1): Bellaphant

Lowell

(1): MagnaOfIllusion
Nosferatu (0): none

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (1): KTthecreeper
KTthecreeper, L-4 (4): Lorell, Killthestory, Oceanwind, Ollie
Ollie (1):

jmo16mla

With 14 players alive, it takes 8 votes to lynch.
day 1 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-04-16 19:01:46)

vote count 1.01

Bellaphant (0): none
SeshatX (0): none

KainTepes

(1):

acryon

jmo16mla

(1): Ollie
MagnaofIllusion (1): Imperium
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (0): none

ChurchOfMercy

(hydra, Klingoncelt and Albert B Rampage) (1): Bellaphant

Lowell

(1): OceanWind,

jmo16mla

Nosferatu (1): MagnaofIllusion

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (1): KTthecreeper
KTthecreeper (4):

Lowell

, Killthestory, Ollie,

ChurchOfMercy

Ollie (1): Nosferatu
With 14 players alive, it takes 8 votes to lynch.
day 1 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-04-16 19:01:46)

vote count 1.02

Bellaphant (0): none
SeshatX (0): none

KainTepes

(0): none

jmo16mla

(2): Ollie, killthestory
MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (0): none

ChurchOfMercy

(hydra, Klingoncelt and Albert B Rampage) (3): Oceanwind,

Lowell

, Imperium

Lowell

(1):

jmo16mla

Nosferatu (0): none

acryon

(2): MagnaofIllusion, killthestory
OceanWind (2): KTthecreeper,

acryon

KTthecreeper (0): none
Ollie (1): Nosferatu
With 14 players alive, it takes 8 votes to lynch.
day 1 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-04-16 19:01:46)

vote count 1.03

Bellaphant (0): none
SeshatX (0): none

KainTepes

(1):

ChurchOfMercy

jmo16mla

(2): Ollie, killthestory
MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (0): none

ChurchOfMercy

(hydra, Klingoncelt and Albert B Rampage) (5) [L-3]: Oceanwind,

Lowell

, Imperium, Bellaphant, MagnaofIllusion

Lowell

(1):

jmo16mla

Nosferatu (1):

acryon

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (1): KTthecreeper
KTthecreeper (0): none
Ollie (1): Nosferatu
With 14 players alive, it takes 8 votes to lynch.
day 1 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-04-16 19:01:46)

vote count 1.04

Bellaphant (0): none

Severa

(0): none

Jim

(0): none

jmo16mla

(1): Ollie
MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (0): none

ChurchOfMercy

(hydra, Klingoncelt and Albert B Rampage) (7) [L-1]: Oceanwind,

Lowell

, Imperium, Bellaphant, MagnaofIllusion, killthestory,

Severa

,

Lowell

(1):

jmo16mla

Nosferatu (1):

acryon

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (1): KTthecreeper
KTthecreeper (1):

ChurchOfMercy

Ollie (1): Nosferatu
With 14 players alive, it takes 8 votes to lynch.
day 1 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-04-16 19:01:46)

vote count 1.05

Bellaphant (0): none

Severa

(0): none

Jim

(1): killthestory

jmo16mla

(1): Ollie
MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (0): none

ChurchOfMercy

(hydra, Klingoncelt and Albert B Rampage) (6) [L-2]: Oceanwind,

Lowell

, Imperium, Bellaphant, MagnaofIllusion,

Severa

,

Lowell

(1):

jmo16mla

Nosferatu (1):

acryon

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (1): KTthecreeper
KTthecreeper (1):

ChurchOfMercy

Ollie (1): Nosferatu
With 14 players alive, it takes 8 votes to lynch.
day 1 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-04-16 19:01:46)

vote count 1.06

Bellaphant (2): killthestory,

ChurchOfMercy

Severa

(0): none

Jim

(1): killthestory

jmo16mla

(0): none
MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (0): none

ChurchOfMercy

(hydra, Klingoncelt and Albert B Rampage) (6) [L-2]: Oceanwind,

Lowell

, Imperium, Bellaphant, MagnaofIllusion,

Severa

,

Lowell

(1):

jmo16mla

Nosferatu (2):

acryon

, Ollie

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none
KTthecreeper (0): none
Ollie (0): none
With 14 players alive, it takes 8 votes to lynch.
day 1 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-04-16 19:01:46)

vote count 1.07

Bellaphant (1):

ChurchOfMercy

Severa

(0): none

Jim

(1): killthestory

jmo16mla

(0): none
MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (0): none

ChurchOfMercy

(hydra, Klingoncelt and Albert B Rampage) (6) [L-2]: Oceanwind,

Lowell

, Imperium, Bellaphant, MagnaofIllusion,

Severa

,

Lowell

(1):

jmo16mla

Nosferatu (2):

acryon

, Ollie

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none

KTthecreeper

xisiqomelir

(0): none
Ollie (0): none
With 14 players alive, it takes 8 votes to lynch.
day 1 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-04-16 19:01:46)

vote count 1.08

Bellaphant (1):

ChurchOfMercy

Severa

(0): none

Jim

(1): killthestory

jmo16mla

(0): none
MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (0): none

ChurchOfMercy

(hydra, Klingoncelt and Albert B Rampage) (6) [L-2]: Oceanwind,

Lowell

, Imperium, Bellaphant, MagnaofIllusion,

Severa

,

Lowell

(1):

jmo16mla

Nosferatu (1): Ollie

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none

KTthecreeper

xisiqomelir

(0): none
Ollie (0): none
With 14 players alive, it takes 8 votes to lynch.
day 1 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-04-16 19:01:46)

vote count 1.09

Bellaphant (1):

ChurchOfMercy

Severa

(0): none

Jim

(1): killthestory

jmo16mla

SnarkySnowman

(0): none
MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (1):

xisiqomelir

ChurchOfMercy

(hydra, Klingoncelt and Albert B Rampage) (6) [L-2]: Oceanwind,

Lowell

, Imperium, Bellaphant, MagnaofIllusion,

Severa

,

Lowell

(1):

jmo16mla

Nosferatu (1): Ollie

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none

KTthecreeper

xisiqomelir

(0): none
Ollie (0): none
With 14 players alive, it takes 8 votes to lynch.
day 1 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-04-16 19:01:46)

vote count 1.10

Bellaphant (1):

ChurchOfMercy

Severa

(0): none

Jim

(1): killthestory

jmo16mla

SnarkySnowman

(1): Xixiqomelir
MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (0): none

ChurchOfMercy

(hydra, Klingoncelt and Albert B Rampage) (6) [L-2]: Oceanwind,

Lowell

, Imperium, Bellaphant, MagnaofIllusion,

Severa

,

Lowell

(0): none
Nosferatu (1): Ollie

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none

KTthecreeper

xisiqomelir

(0): none
Ollie (0): none
not voting:

Jim

,

SnarkySnowman

, Nosferatu,

acryon

,
With 14 players alive, it takes 8 votes to lynch.
day 1 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-04-16 19:01:46)

vote count 1.11

Bellaphant (0): none

Severa

(1):

ChurchOfMercy

Jim

(1): killthestory

jmo16mla

SnarkySnowman

(1): Xixiqomelir
MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (0): none

ChurchOfMercy

(hydra, Klingoncelt and Albert B Rampage) (6) [L-2]: Oceanwind,

Lowell

, Imperium, Bellaphant, MagnaofIllusion,

Severa

,

Lowell

(0): none
Nosferatu (1): Ollie

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none

KTthecreeper

xisiqomelir

(0): none
Ollie (0): none
not voting:

Jim

,

SnarkySnowman

, Nosferatu,

acryon

,
With 14 players alive, it takes 8 votes to lynch.
day 1 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-04-16 19:01:46)

vote count 1.11

Bellaphant (0): none

Severa

(2):

ChurchOfMercy

,

SnarkySnowman

Jim

(1): killthestory

jmo16mla

SnarkySnowman

(0): none
MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (0): none

ChurchOfMercy

(hydra, Klingoncelt and Albert B Rampage) (7) [L-1]: Oceanwind,

Lowell

, Imperium, Bellaphant, MagnaofIllusion,

Severa

, Xixiqomelir

Lowell

(0): none
Nosferatu (1): Ollie

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none

KTthecreeper

xisiqomelir

(0): none
Ollie (0): none
not voting:

Jim

, Nosferatu,

acryon

,
With 14 players alive, it takes 8 votes to lynch.
day 1 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-04-16 19:01:46)

vote count 1.12

Bellaphant (0): none

Severa

(2):

ChurchOfMercy

,

SnarkySnowman

Jim

(1): killthestory

jmo16mla

SnarkySnowman

(3):

Severa

, OceanWind,

xisiqomelir

MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (0): none

ChurchOfMercy

(hydra, Klingoncelt and Albert B Rampage) (5) [L-3]:

Lowell

, Imperium, Bellaphant, MagnaofIllusion,

acryon

Lowell

(0): none
Nosferatu (1): Ollie

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none

KTthecreeper

xisiqomelir

(0): none
Ollie (0): none
not voting:

Jim

, Nosferatu
With 14 players alive, it takes 8 votes to lynch.
day 1 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-04-16 19:01:46)

vote count 1.13

Bellaphant (0): none

Severa

(1):

SnarkySnowman

Jim

heuristically_alone

(0): none

jmo16mla

SnarkySnowman

(4): OceanWind,

xisiqomelir

,

ChurchOfMercy

, ollie
MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (0): none

ChurchOfMercy

(hydra, Klingoncelt and Albert B Rampage) (6) [L-2]:

Lowell

, Imperium, Bellaphant, MagnaofIllusion,

acryon

,

Severa

Lowell

(0): none
Nosferatu (0): none

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none

KTthecreeper

xisiqomelir

(0): none
Ollie (0): none
not voting:

heuristically_alone

, Nosferatu
With 14 players alive, it takes 8 votes to lynch.
day 1 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-04-18 19:01:46)

vote count 1.14

Bellaphant (0): none

Severa

(1):

SnarkySnowman

Jim

heuristically_alone

(0): none

jmo16mla

SnarkySnowman

(5) [L-3]: OceanWind,

xisiqomelir

,

ChurchOfMercy

, ollie,

heuristically_alone

MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (0): none

ChurchOfMercy

(hydra, Klingoncelt and Albert B Rampage) (6) [L-2]:

Lowell

, Imperium, Bellaphant, MagnaofIllusion,

acryon

,

Severa

Lowell

(0): none
Nosferatu (0): none

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none

KTthecreeper

xisiqomelir

(0): none
Ollie (0): none
not voting: Nosferatu
With 14 players alive, it takes 8 votes to lynch.
day 1 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-04-18 19:01:46)

vote count 1.15

Bellaphant (0): none

Severa

(1):

SnarkySnowman

Jim

heuristically_alone

(0): none

jmo16mla

SnarkySnowman

(4): OceanWind,

xisiqomelir

, ollie, Nosferatu
MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (0): none

ChurchOfMercy

(hydra, Klingoncelt and Albert B Rampage) (8) [LYNCHED]:

Lowell

, Imperium, Bellaphant, MagnaofIllusion,

acryon

,

Severa

,

heuristically_alone

,

ChurchOfMercy

Lowell

(0): none
Nosferatu (0): none

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none

KTthecreeper

xisiqomelir

(0): none
Ollie (0): none
not voting (1): killthestory
With 14 players alive, it takes 8 votes to lynch.
day 1 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-04-18 19:01:46)

vote count 2.01

Bellaphant (0): none

Severa

(0): none

Jim

heuristically_alone

(0): none

jmo16mla

SnarkySnowman

(0): none
MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (0): none

Lowell

(0): none
Nosferatu (0): none

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none
Ollie (0): none
not voting: Bellaphant,

Severa

,

heuristically_alone

,

SnarkySnowman

, MagnaofIllusion, Imperium, killthestory,

Lowell

, Nosferatu,

acryon

, OceanWind, Ollie
With 12 players alive, it takes 7 votes to lynch.
day 2 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-05-04 20:01:46)

vote count 2.02

Bellaphant (0): none

Severa

(4) [L-3]: Oceanwind,

SnarkySnowman

, killthestory,

heuristically_alone

Jim

heuristically_alone

(0): none

jmo16mla

SnarkySnowman

(1):

Severa

MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (1): MagnaofIllusion

Lowell

(1): Ollie
Nosferatu (0): none

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none
Ollie (1):

Lowell

not voting: Bellaphant, Imperium, Nosferatu,

acryon

,
With 12 players alive, it takes 7 votes to lynch.
day 2 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-05-04 20:01:46)

vote count 2.03

Bellaphant (0): none

Severa

(4) [L-3]: Oceanwind,

SnarkySnowman

, killthestory,

heuristically_alone

Jim

heuristically_alone

Ranger

(0): none

jmo16mla

SnarkySnowman

(3) [L-4]:

Severa

, Imperium, Nosferatu
MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (1): MagnaofIllusion

Lowell

(1): Ollie
Nosferatu (0): none

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none
Ollie (1):

Lowell

not voting: Bellaphant,

acryon

,
With 12 players alive, it takes 7 votes to lynch.
day 2 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-05-04 20:01:46)

vote count 2.04

Bellaphant (0): none

Severa

(3) [L-4]: Oceanwind,

SnarkySnowman

, killthestory

Jim

heuristically_alone

Ranger

(0): none

jmo16mla

SnarkySnowman

(4) [L-3]:

Severa

, Imperium, Nosferatu,

Ranger

MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (2): MagnaofIllusion,

acryon

Lowell

(1): Ollie
Nosferatu (0): none

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none
Ollie (1):

Lowell

not voting: Bellaphant
With 12 players alive, it takes 7 votes to lynch.
day 2 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-05-04 20:01:46)

vote count 2.05

Bellaphant (0): none

Severa

(1):

SnarkySnowman

Jim

heuristically_alone

Ranger

(0): none

jmo16mla

SnarkySnowman

(5) [L-2]:

Severa

, Imperium, Nosferatu,

Ranger

, Oceanwind
MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (2): MagnaofIllusion,

acryon

Lowell

(2): Ollie, killthestory
Nosferatu (0): none

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none
Ollie (1):

Lowell

not voting: Bellaphant
With 12 players alive, it takes 7 votes to lynch.
day 2 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-05-04 20:01:46)

vote count 2.06

Bellaphant

Virtue (0): none

Severa

(1):

SnarkySnowman

Jim

heuristically_alone

Ranger

(3): MagnaofIllusion, Oceanwind, Ollie

jmo16mla

SnarkySnowman

(3):

Severa

, Imperium, Nosferatu,

Ranger

MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (1):

acryon

Lowell

(2): Ollie, killthestory
Nosferatu (0): none

acryon

Massive

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none
Ollie (1):

Lowell

not voting: Virtue
With 12 players alive, it takes 7 votes to lynch.
day 2 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-05-04 20:01:46)

vote count 2.07

Bellaphant

Virtue (0): none

Severa

(1):

SnarkySnowman

Jim

heuristically_alone

Ranger

(2): MagnaofIllusion, Ollie

jmo16mla

SnarkySnowman

(5) [L-2]:

Severa

, Imperium, Nosferatu,

Ranger

, Oceanwind
MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (1):

acryon

Lowell

Masquerade

(3): Ollie, killthestory, Virtue
Nosferatu (0): none

acryon

Massive

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none
Ollie (1):

Masquerade

not voting:
With 12 players alive, it takes 7 votes to lynch.
day 2 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-05-04 20:01:46)

I have yet to find a replacement for

Lowell

, no-one has contacted me.

vote count 2.08

Bellaphant

Virtue (0): none

Severa

(1):

SnarkySnowman

Jim

heuristically_alone

Ranger

(2): MagnaofIllusion, Ollie

jmo16mla

SnarkySnowman

(6) [L-1]:

Severa

, Imperium, Nosferatu,

Ranger

, Oceanwind,

Massive

MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (0): none

Lowell

Masquerade

(3): Ollie, killthestory, Virtue
Nosferatu (0): none

acryon

Massive

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none
Ollie (1):

Masquerade

not voting:
With 12 players alive, it takes 7 votes to lynch.
day 2 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-05-04 20:01:46)

vote count 2.09

Bellaphant

Virtue (0): none

Severa

(1):

SnarkySnowman

Jim

heuristically_alone

Ranger

(2): MagnaofIllusion, Ollie

jmo16mla

SnarkySnowman

(7) [LYNCHED]:

Severa

, Imperium, Nosferatu,

Ranger

, Oceanwind,

Massive

, killthestory
MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (0): none

Lowell

Masquerade

(1): Virtue
Nosferatu (0): none

acryon

Massive

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none
Ollie (1):

Masquerade

not voting:
With 12 players alive, it takes 7 votes to lynch.
day 2 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-05-04 20:01:46)

VC 3.01

Virtue (0): none

Ranger

(0): none
MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (0): none

Masquerade

(0): none
Nosferatu (0): none

Massive

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none
Ollie (0): none
not voting: Virtue,

Ranger

, MagnaofIllusion, Imperium, killthestory,

Masquerade

, Nosferatu,

Massive

, OceanWind, Ollie
With 10 players alive, it takes 6 votes to lynch.
day 3 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-05-19 01:10:00)

VC 3.02

Virtue (0): none

Ranger

(3) [L-3]: OceanWind, MagnaofIllusion, Ollie
MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (0): none

Masquerade

(0): none
Nosferatu (1): Virtue

Massive

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none
Ollie (0): none
not voting:

Ranger

, Imperium, killthestory,

Masquerade

, Nosferatu,

Massive

,
With 10 players alive, it takes 6 votes to lynch.
day 3 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-05-19 01:10:00)

VC 3.03

Virtue (1): Nosferatu

Ranger

(3) [L-3]: OceanWind, MagnaofIllusion, Ollie
MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (0): none

Masquerade

(0): none
Nosferatu (1): Virtue

Massive

(1):

Masquerade

OceanWind (0): none
Ollie (0): none
not voting:

Ranger

, Imperium, killthestory,

Massive

,
With 10 players alive, it takes 6 votes to lynch.
day 3 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-05-19 01:10:00)

VC 3.04

Titus (0): none

Ranger

(0): none
MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (0): none

Masquerade

(2) [L-4]: OceanWind, Ollie
Nosferatu (0): none

Massive

(1):

Masquerade

OceanWind (2) [L-4]: MagnaofIllusion, Titus
Ollie (0): none
not voting:

Ranger

, Imperium, killthestory,

Massive

, Nosferatu
With 10 players alive, it takes 6 votes to lynch.
day 3 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-05-19 01:10:00)

VC 3.05

Titus (0): none

Ranger

(0): none
MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (0): none

Masquerade

(3) [L-3]: RachMarie, Ollie,

Massive

Nosferatu (0): none

Massive

(0): None
RachMarie (3) [L-3]: MagnaofIllusion, Titus,

Masquerade

Ollie (0): none
not voting:

Ranger

, Imperium, killthestory, Nosferatu
With 10 players alive, it takes 6 votes to lynch.
day 3 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-05-19 01:10:00)

VC 3.06

Titus (0): none

Ranger

(1):

Masquerade

MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (0): none

Masquerade

(4) [L-2]: RachMarie, Ollie,

Massive

, Killthestory
Nosferatu (0): none

Massive

(0): None
RachMarie (2) [L-4]: MagnaofIllusion, Titus
Ollie (0): none
not voting:

Ranger

, Imperium, Nosferatu
With 10 players alive, it takes 6 votes to lynch.
day 3 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-05-19 01:10:00)

VC 3.07

Titus (0): none

Ranger

(2):

Masquerade

, MagnaofIllusion
MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (0): none

Masquerade

(5) [L-1]: RachMarie, Ollie,

Massive

, Killthestory, Titus
Nosferatu (0): none

Massive

(0): None
RachMarie (0): none
Ollie (0): none
not voting:

Ranger

, Imperium, Nosferatu
With 10 players alive, it takes 6 votes to lynch.
day 3 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-05-22 01:10:00)

VC 3.08

Titus (0): none

Ranger

(3) [L-3]:

Masquerade

, MagnaofIllusion, Imperium
MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (0): none

Masquerade

(5) [L-1]: RachMarie, Ollie,

Massive

, Killthestory, Titus
Nosferatu (0): none

Massive

(0): None
RachMarie (0): none
Ollie (0): none
not voting:

Ranger

, Nosferatu
With 10 players alive, it takes 6 votes to lynch.
day 3 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-05-22 01:10:00)

VC 3.08

Titus (0): none

Ranger

(3) [L-3]:

Masquerade

, MagnaofIllusion, Imperium
MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (0): none

Masquerade

(6) [LYNCHED]: RachMarie, Ollie,

Massive

, Killthestory, Titus,

Ranger

Nosferatu (0): none

Massive

(0): None
RachMarie (0): none
Ollie (0): none
not voting: Nosferatu
With 10 players alive, it takes 6 votes to lynch.
day 3 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-05-22 01:10:00)

VC 4.01

Titus (0): none

Ranger

(0): none
MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (0): none
Nosferatu (0): none
RachMarie (0): none
Ollie (0): none
not voting:

Ranger

, Nosferatu, MagnaofIllusion, Imperium, Killthestory, RachMarie, Ollie, Titus
With 8 players alive, it takes 5 votes to lynch.
day 4 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-06-04 18:00:00)

VC 4.02

Titus (0): none

Ranger

(1): Killthestory
MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (0): none
Nosferatu (0): none
RachMarie (0): none
Ollie (0): none
No Lynch (1): RachMarie
not voting:

Ranger

, Nosferatu, MagnaofIllusion, Imperium, Ollie, Titus
With 8 players alive, it takes 5 votes to lynch.
day 4 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-06-04 18:00:00)

VC 4.03

Titus (0): none

Ranger

(1): Killthestory
MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (0): none
Nosferatu (0): none
RachMarie (0): none
Ollie (0): none
No Lynch (2): RachMarie, Nosferatu
not voting:

Ranger

, MagnaofIllusion, Imperium, Ollie, Titus
With 8 players alive, it takes 5 votes to lynch.
day 4 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-06-04 18:00:00)

VC 4.04

Titus (0): none

Ranger

(1): Killthestory
MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (0): none
Nosferatu (0): none
RachMarie (0): none
Ollie (0): none
No Lynch (1): Nosferatu
not voting:

Ranger

, MagnaofIllusion, Imperium, Ollie, Titus, RachMarie
With 8 players alive, it takes 5 votes to lynch.
day 4 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-06-04 18:00:00)

VC 4.05

Titus (0): none

Ranger

(3) [L-2]: Killthestory, Titus, Nosferatu
MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (0): none
Nosferatu (0): none
RachMarie (0): none
Ollie (0): none
No Lynch (0): none
not voting:

Ranger

, MagnaofIllusion, Imperium, Ollie, RachMarie
With 8 players alive, it takes 5 votes to lynch.
day 4 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-06-04 18:00:00)

VC 4.06

Titus (0): none

Ranger

(3) [L-2]: Killthestory, Titus, MagnaofIllusion
MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (0): none
Nosferatu (0): none
RachMarie (0): none
Ollie (0): none
No Lynch (1): Nosferatu
not voting:

Ranger

, Imperium, Ollie, RachMarie
With 8 players alive, it takes 5 votes to lynch.
day 4 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-06-04 18:00:00)

VC 4.06

Titus (0): none

Ranger

(2) [L-3]: Killthestory, Titus
MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (0): none
Nosferatu (0): none
RachMarie (0): none
Ollie (0): none
No Lynch (1): Nosferatu
not voting:

Ranger

, Imperium, Ollie, RachMarie, MagnaofIllusion
With 8 players alive, it takes 5 votes to lynch.
day 4 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-06-04 18:00:00)

VC 4.06

Titus (0): none

Ranger

(3) [L-2]: Killthestory, Ollie, MagnaofIllusion
MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (0): none
Nosferatu (0): none
RachMarie (0): none
Ollie (0): none
No Lynch (1): Nosferatu
not voting:

Ranger

, Imperium, RachMarie, Titus
With 8 players alive, it takes 5 votes to lynch.
day 4 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-06-04 18:00:00)

VC 4.07

Titus (0): none

Ranger

(5) [LYNCHED]: Killthestory, Ollie, MagnaofIllusion, Titus, Imperium
MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (1):

Ranger

Nosferatu (0): none
RachMarie (0): none
Ollie (0): none
No Lynch (1): Nosferatu
not voting: RachMarie
With 8 players alive, it takes 5 votes to lynch.
day 4 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-06-04 18:00:00)

vote count 5.01

Titus (0): none
MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (0): none
Nosferatu (0): none
RachMarie (0): none
Ollie (0): none
No Lynch (0): none
not voting: Titus, MagnaofIllusion, Imperium, Killthestory, Nosferatu, RachMarie, Ollie
with 7 players alive, it takes 4 votes to lynch
day 5 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-06-20 16:00:00)

vote count 5.02

Titus (0): none
MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (1): MagnaofIllusion
Nosferatu (0): none
RachMarie (0): none
Ollie (0): none
No Lynch (0): none
not voting: Titus, Imperium, Killthestory, Nosferatu, RachMarie, Ollie
with 7 players alive, it takes 4 votes to lynch
day 5 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-06-20 16:00:00)

vote count 5.02

Titus (0): none
MagnaofIllusion (0): none
Imperium (0): none
Killthestory (1): MagnaofIllusion
Nosferatu (0): none
RachMarie (0): none
Ollie (3) [L-1]: Imperium, RachMarie, killthestory
No Lynch (0): none
not voting: Titus, Nosferatu, Ollie
with 7 players alive, it takes 4 votes to lynch
day 5 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-06-20 16:00:00)

Spoiler: PRs included

since 9 people have responded, the game shall begin.

vote count

Bellaphant: none
SeshatX: none

KainTepes

: none

jmo16mla

: none

MagnaofIllusion

: none
Imperium: none

killthestory

: none

ChurchOfMercy

(hydra, Klingoncelt and Albert B Rampage): none

Lowell

: none
Nosferatu: none

acryon

: none
OceanWind: none
KTthecreeper: none
Ollie: none
With 14 alive, it takes 8 votes to have a lynch.
day 1 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-04-16 19:01:46)

vote count 1.01

Bellaphant (0): none
SeshatX (1):

ChurchOfMercy

KainTepes

(0): none

jmo16mla

(1): Ollie

MagnaofIllusion

(1): Imperium
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(0): none

ChurchOfMercy

(hydra, Klingoncelt and Albert B Rampage) (1): Bellaphant

Lowell

(1):

MagnaofIllusion

Nosferatu (0): none

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (1): KTthecreeper
KTthecreeper, L-4 (4): Lorell,

killthestory

, Oceanwind, Ollie
Ollie (1):

jmo16mla

With 14 players alive, it takes 8 votes to lynch.
day 1 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-04-16 19:01:46)

vote count 1.01

Bellaphant (0): none
SeshatX (0): none

KainTepes

(1):

acryon

jmo16mla

(1): Ollie

MagnaofIllusion

(1): Imperium
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(0): none

ChurchOfMercy

(hydra, Klingoncelt and Albert B Rampage) (1): Bellaphant

Lowell

(1): OceanWind,

jmo16mla

Nosferatu (1):

MagnaofIllusion

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (1): KTthecreeper
KTthecreeper (4):

Lowell

,

killthestory

, Ollie,

ChurchOfMercy

Ollie (1): Nosferatu
With 14 players alive, it takes 8 votes to lynch.
day 1 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-04-16 19:01:46)

vote count 1.02

Bellaphant (0): none
SeshatX (0): none

KainTepes

(0): none

jmo16mla

(2): Ollie,

killthestory

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(0): none

ChurchOfMercy

(hydra, Klingoncelt and Albert B Rampage) (3): Oceanwind,

Lowell

, Imperium

Lowell

(1):

jmo16mla

Nosferatu (0): none

acryon

(2):

MagnaofIllusion

,

killthestory

OceanWind (2): KTthecreeper,

acryon

KTthecreeper (0): none
Ollie (1): Nosferatu
With 14 players alive, it takes 8 votes to lynch.
day 1 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-04-16 19:01:46)

vote count 1.03

Bellaphant (0): none
SeshatX (0): none

KainTepes

(1):

ChurchOfMercy

jmo16mla

(2): Ollie,

killthestory

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(0): none

ChurchOfMercy

(hydra, Klingoncelt and Albert B Rampage) (5) [L-3]: Oceanwind,

Lowell

, Imperium, Bellaphant,

MagnaofIllusion

Lowell

(1):

jmo16mla

Nosferatu (1):

acryon

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (1): KTthecreeper
KTthecreeper (0): none
Ollie (1): Nosferatu
With 14 players alive, it takes 8 votes to lynch.
day 1 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-04-16 19:01:46)

vote count 1.04

Bellaphant (0): none

Severa

(0): none

Jim

(0): none

jmo16mla

(1): Ollie

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(0): none

ChurchOfMercy

(hydra, Klingoncelt and Albert B Rampage) (7) [L-1]: Oceanwind,

Lowell

, Imperium, Bellaphant,

MagnaofIllusion

,

killthestory

,

Severa

,

Lowell

(1):

jmo16mla

Nosferatu (1):

acryon

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (1): KTthecreeper
KTthecreeper (1):

ChurchOfMercy

Ollie (1): Nosferatu
With 14 players alive, it takes 8 votes to lynch.
day 1 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-04-16 19:01:46)

vote count 1.05

Bellaphant (0): none

Severa

(0): none

Jim

(1):

killthestory

jmo16mla

(1): Ollie

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(0): none

ChurchOfMercy

(hydra, Klingoncelt and Albert B Rampage) (6) [L-2]: Oceanwind,

Lowell

, Imperium, Bellaphant,

MagnaofIllusion

,

Severa

,

Lowell

(1):

jmo16mla

Nosferatu (1):

acryon

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (1): KTthecreeper
KTthecreeper (1):

ChurchOfMercy

Ollie (1): Nosferatu
With 14 players alive, it takes 8 votes to lynch.
day 1 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-04-16 19:01:46)

vote count 1.06

Bellaphant (2):

killthestory

,

ChurchOfMercy

Severa

(0): none

Jim

(1):

killthestory

jmo16mla

(0): none

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(0): none

ChurchOfMercy

(hydra, Klingoncelt and Albert B Rampage) (6) [L-2]: Oceanwind,

Lowell

, Imperium, Bellaphant,

MagnaofIllusion

,

Severa

,

Lowell

(1):

jmo16mla

Nosferatu (2):

acryon

, Ollie

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none
KTthecreeper (0): none
Ollie (0): none
With 14 players alive, it takes 8 votes to lynch.
day 1 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-04-16 19:01:46)

vote count 1.07

Bellaphant (1):

ChurchOfMercy

Severa

(0): none

Jim

(1):

killthestory

jmo16mla

(0): none

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(0): none

ChurchOfMercy

(hydra, Klingoncelt and Albert B Rampage) (6) [L-2]: Oceanwind,

Lowell

, Imperium, Bellaphant,

MagnaofIllusion

,

Severa

,

Lowell

(1):

jmo16mla

Nosferatu (2):

acryon

, Ollie

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none

KTthecreeper

xisiqomelir

(0): none
Ollie (0): none
With 14 players alive, it takes 8 votes to lynch.
day 1 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-04-16 19:01:46)

vote count 1.08

Bellaphant (1):

ChurchOfMercy

Severa

(0): none

Jim

(1):

killthestory

jmo16mla

(0): none

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(0): none

ChurchOfMercy

(hydra, Klingoncelt and Albert B Rampage) (6) [L-2]: Oceanwind,

Lowell

, Imperium, Bellaphant,

MagnaofIllusion

,

Severa

,

Lowell

(1):

jmo16mla

Nosferatu (1): Ollie

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none

KTthecreeper

xisiqomelir

(0): none
Ollie (0): none
With 14 players alive, it takes 8 votes to lynch.
day 1 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-04-16 19:01:46)

vote count 1.09

Bellaphant (1):

ChurchOfMercy

Severa

(0): none

Jim

(1):

killthestory

jmo16mla

SnarkySnowman

(0): none

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(1):

xisiqomelir

ChurchOfMercy

(hydra, Klingoncelt and Albert B Rampage) (6) [L-2]: Oceanwind,

Lowell

, Imperium, Bellaphant,

MagnaofIllusion

,

Severa

,

Lowell

(1):

jmo16mla

Nosferatu (1): Ollie

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none

KTthecreeper

xisiqomelir

(0): none
Ollie (0): none
With 14 players alive, it takes 8 votes to lynch.
day 1 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-04-16 19:01:46)

vote count 1.10

Bellaphant (1):

ChurchOfMercy

Severa

(0): none

Jim

(1):

killthestory

jmo16mla

SnarkySnowman

(1): Xixiqomelir

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(0): none

ChurchOfMercy

(hydra, Klingoncelt and Albert B Rampage) (6) [L-2]: Oceanwind,

Lowell

, Imperium, Bellaphant,

MagnaofIllusion

,

Severa

,

Lowell

(0): none
Nosferatu (1): Ollie

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none

KTthecreeper

xisiqomelir

(0): none
Ollie (0): none
not voting:

Jim

,

SnarkySnowman

, Nosferatu,

acryon

,
With 14 players alive, it takes 8 votes to lynch.
day 1 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-04-16 19:01:46)

vote count 1.11

Bellaphant (0): none

Severa

(1):

ChurchOfMercy

Jim

(1):

killthestory

jmo16mla

SnarkySnowman

(1): Xixiqomelir

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(0): none

ChurchOfMercy

(hydra, Klingoncelt and Albert B Rampage) (6) [L-2]: Oceanwind,

Lowell

, Imperium, Bellaphant,

MagnaofIllusion

,

Severa

,

Lowell

(0): none
Nosferatu (1): Ollie

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none

KTthecreeper

xisiqomelir

(0): none
Ollie (0): none
not voting:

Jim

,

SnarkySnowman

, Nosferatu,

acryon

,
With 14 players alive, it takes 8 votes to lynch.
day 1 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-04-16 19:01:46)

vote count 1.11

Bellaphant (0): none

Severa

(2):

ChurchOfMercy

,

SnarkySnowman

Jim

(1):

killthestory

jmo16mla

SnarkySnowman

(0): none

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(0): none

ChurchOfMercy

(hydra, Klingoncelt and Albert B Rampage) (7) [L-1]: Oceanwind,

Lowell

, Imperium, Bellaphant,

MagnaofIllusion

,

Severa

, Xixiqomelir

Lowell

(0): none
Nosferatu (1): Ollie

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none

KTthecreeper

xisiqomelir

(0): none
Ollie (0): none
not voting:

Jim

, Nosferatu,

acryon

,
With 14 players alive, it takes 8 votes to lynch.
day 1 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-04-16 19:01:46)

vote count 1.12

Bellaphant (0): none

Severa

(2):

ChurchOfMercy

,

SnarkySnowman

Jim

(1):

killthestory

jmo16mla

SnarkySnowman

(3):

Severa

, OceanWind,

xisiqomelir

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(0): none

ChurchOfMercy

(hydra, Klingoncelt and Albert B Rampage) (5) [L-3]:

Lowell

, Imperium, Bellaphant,

MagnaofIllusion

,

acryon

Lowell

(0): none
Nosferatu (1): Ollie

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none

KTthecreeper

xisiqomelir

(0): none
Ollie (0): none
not voting:

Jim

, Nosferatu
With 14 players alive, it takes 8 votes to lynch.
day 1 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-04-16 19:01:46)

vote count 1.13

Bellaphant (0): none

Severa

(1):

SnarkySnowman

Jim

heuristically_alone

(0): none

jmo16mla

SnarkySnowman

(4): OceanWind,

xisiqomelir

,

ChurchOfMercy

, ollie

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(0): none

ChurchOfMercy

(hydra, Klingoncelt and Albert B Rampage) (6) [L-2]:

Lowell

, Imperium, Bellaphant,

MagnaofIllusion

,

acryon

,

Severa

Lowell

(0): none
Nosferatu (0): none

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none

KTthecreeper

xisiqomelir

(0): none
Ollie (0): none
not voting:

heuristically_alone

, Nosferatu
With 14 players alive, it takes 8 votes to lynch.
day 1 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-04-18 19:01:46)

vote count 1.14

Bellaphant (0): none

Severa

(1):

SnarkySnowman

Jim

heuristically_alone

(0): none

jmo16mla

SnarkySnowman

(5) [L-3]: OceanWind,

xisiqomelir

,

ChurchOfMercy

, ollie,

heuristically_alone

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(0): none

ChurchOfMercy

(hydra, Klingoncelt and Albert B Rampage) (6) [L-2]:

Lowell

, Imperium, Bellaphant,

MagnaofIllusion

,

acryon

,

Severa

Lowell

(0): none
Nosferatu (0): none

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none

KTthecreeper

xisiqomelir

(0): none
Ollie (0): none
not voting: Nosferatu
With 14 players alive, it takes 8 votes to lynch.
day 1 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-04-18 19:01:46)

vote count 1.15

Bellaphant (0): none

Severa

(1):

SnarkySnowman

Jim

heuristically_alone

(0): none

jmo16mla

SnarkySnowman

(4): OceanWind,

xisiqomelir

, ollie, Nosferatu

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(0): none

ChurchOfMercy

(hydra, Klingoncelt and Albert B Rampage) (8) [LYNCHED]:

Lowell

, Imperium, Bellaphant,

MagnaofIllusion

,

acryon

,

Severa

,

heuristically_alone

,

ChurchOfMercy

Lowell

(0): none
Nosferatu (0): none

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none

KTthecreeper

xisiqomelir

(0): none
Ollie (0): none
not voting (1):

killthestory

With 14 players alive, it takes 8 votes to lynch.
day 1 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-04-18 19:01:46)

vote count 2.01

Bellaphant (0): none

Severa

(0): none

Jim

heuristically_alone

(0): none

jmo16mla

SnarkySnowman

(0): none

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(0): none

Lowell

(0): none
Nosferatu (0): none

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none
Ollie (0): none
not voting: Bellaphant,

Severa

,

heuristically_alone

,

SnarkySnowman

,

MagnaofIllusion

, Imperium,

killthestory

,

Lowell

, Nosferatu,

acryon

, OceanWind, Ollie
With 12 players alive, it takes 7 votes to lynch.
day 2 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-05-04 20:01:46)

vote count 2.02

Bellaphant (0): none

Severa

(4) [L-3]: Oceanwind,

SnarkySnowman

,

killthestory

,

heuristically_alone

Jim

heuristically_alone

(0): none

jmo16mla

SnarkySnowman

(1):

Severa

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(1):

MagnaofIllusion

Lowell

(1): Ollie
Nosferatu (0): none

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none
Ollie (1):

Lowell

not voting: Bellaphant, Imperium, Nosferatu,

acryon

,
With 12 players alive, it takes 7 votes to lynch.
day 2 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-05-04 20:01:46)

vote count 2.03

Bellaphant (0): none

Severa

(4) [L-3]: Oceanwind,

SnarkySnowman

,

killthestory

,

heuristically_alone

Jim

heuristically_alone

Ranger

(0): none

jmo16mla

SnarkySnowman

(3) [L-4]:

Severa

, Imperium, Nosferatu

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(1):

MagnaofIllusion

Lowell

(1): Ollie
Nosferatu (0): none

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none
Ollie (1):

Lowell

not voting: Bellaphant,

acryon

,
With 12 players alive, it takes 7 votes to lynch.
day 2 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-05-04 20:01:46)

vote count 2.04

Bellaphant (0): none

Severa

(3) [L-4]: Oceanwind,

SnarkySnowman

,

killthestory

Jim

heuristically_alone

Ranger

(0): none

jmo16mla

SnarkySnowman

(4) [L-3]:

Severa

, Imperium, Nosferatu,

Ranger

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(2):

MagnaofIllusion

,

acryon

Lowell

(1): Ollie
Nosferatu (0): none

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none
Ollie (1):

Lowell

not voting: Bellaphant
With 12 players alive, it takes 7 votes to lynch.
day 2 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-05-04 20:01:46)

vote count 2.05

Bellaphant (0): none

Severa

(1):

SnarkySnowman

Jim

heuristically_alone

Ranger

(0): none

jmo16mla

SnarkySnowman

(5) [L-2]:

Severa

, Imperium, Nosferatu,

Ranger

, Oceanwind

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(2):

MagnaofIllusion

,

acryon

Lowell

(2): Ollie,

killthestory

Nosferatu (0): none

acryon

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none
Ollie (1):

Lowell

not voting: Bellaphant
With 12 players alive, it takes 7 votes to lynch.
day 2 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-05-04 20:01:46)

vote count 2.06

Bellaphant

Virtue (0): none

Severa

(1):

SnarkySnowman

Jim

heuristically_alone

Ranger

(3):

MagnaofIllusion

, Oceanwind, Ollie

jmo16mla

SnarkySnowman

(3):

Severa

, Imperium, Nosferatu,

Ranger

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(1):

acryon

Lowell

(2): Ollie,

killthestory

Nosferatu (0): none

acryon

Massive

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none
Ollie (1):

Lowell

not voting: Virtue
With 12 players alive, it takes 7 votes to lynch.
day 2 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-05-04 20:01:46)

vote count 2.07

Bellaphant

Virtue (0): none

Severa

(1):

SnarkySnowman

Jim

heuristically_alone

Ranger

(2):

MagnaofIllusion

, Ollie

jmo16mla

SnarkySnowman

(5) [L-2]:

Severa

, Imperium, Nosferatu,

Ranger

, Oceanwind

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(1):

acryon

Lowell

Masquerade

(3): Ollie,

killthestory

, Virtue
Nosferatu (0): none

acryon

Massive

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none
Ollie (1):

Masquerade

not voting:
With 12 players alive, it takes 7 votes to lynch.
day 2 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-05-04 20:01:46)

I have yet to find a replacement for

Lowell

, no-one has contacted me.

vote count 2.08

Bellaphant

Virtue (0): none

Severa

(1):

SnarkySnowman

Jim

heuristically_alone

Ranger

(2):

MagnaofIllusion

, Ollie

jmo16mla

SnarkySnowman

(6) [L-1]:

Severa

, Imperium, Nosferatu,

Ranger

, Oceanwind,

Massive

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(0): none

Lowell

Masquerade

(3): Ollie,

killthestory

, Virtue
Nosferatu (0): none

acryon

Massive

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none
Ollie (1):

Masquerade

not voting:
With 12 players alive, it takes 7 votes to lynch.
day 2 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-05-04 20:01:46)

vote count 2.09

Bellaphant

Virtue (0): none

Severa

(1):

SnarkySnowman

Jim

heuristically_alone

Ranger

(2):

MagnaofIllusion

, Ollie

jmo16mla

SnarkySnowman

(7) [LYNCHED]:

Severa

, Imperium, Nosferatu,

Ranger

, Oceanwind,

Massive

,

killthestory

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(0): none

Lowell

Masquerade

(1): Virtue
Nosferatu (0): none

acryon

Massive

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none
Ollie (1):

Masquerade

not voting:
With 12 players alive, it takes 7 votes to lynch.
day 2 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-05-04 20:01:46)

VC 3.01

Virtue (0): none

Ranger

(0): none

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(0): none

Masquerade

(0): none
Nosferatu (0): none

Massive

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none
Ollie (0): none
not voting: Virtue,

Ranger

,

MagnaofIllusion

, Imperium,

killthestory

,

Masquerade

, Nosferatu,

Massive

, OceanWind, Ollie
With 10 players alive, it takes 6 votes to lynch.
day 3 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-05-19 01:10:00)

VC 3.02

Virtue (0): none

Ranger

(3) [L-3]: OceanWind,

MagnaofIllusion

, Ollie

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(0): none

Masquerade

(0): none
Nosferatu (1): Virtue

Massive

(0): none
OceanWind (0): none
Ollie (0): none
not voting:

Ranger

, Imperium,

killthestory

,

Masquerade

, Nosferatu,

Massive

,
With 10 players alive, it takes 6 votes to lynch.
day 3 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-05-19 01:10:00)

VC 3.03

Virtue (1): Nosferatu

Ranger

(3) [L-3]: OceanWind,

MagnaofIllusion

, Ollie

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(0): none

Masquerade

(0): none
Nosferatu (1): Virtue

Massive

(1):

Masquerade

OceanWind (0): none
Ollie (0): none
not voting:

Ranger

, Imperium,

killthestory

,

Massive

,
With 10 players alive, it takes 6 votes to lynch.
day 3 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-05-19 01:10:00)

VC 3.04

Titus (0): none

Ranger

(0): none

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(0): none

Masquerade

(2) [L-4]: OceanWind, Ollie
Nosferatu (0): none

Massive

(1):

Masquerade

OceanWind (2) [L-4]:

MagnaofIllusion

, Titus
Ollie (0): none
not voting:

Ranger

, Imperium,

killthestory

,

Massive

, Nosferatu
With 10 players alive, it takes 6 votes to lynch.
day 3 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-05-19 01:10:00)

VC 3.05

Titus (0): none

Ranger

(0): none

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(0): none

Masquerade

(3) [L-3]: RachMarie, Ollie,

Massive

Nosferatu (0): none

Massive

(0): None
RachMarie (3) [L-3]:

MagnaofIllusion

, Titus,

Masquerade

Ollie (0): none
not voting:

Ranger

, Imperium,

killthestory

, Nosferatu
With 10 players alive, it takes 6 votes to lynch.
day 3 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-05-19 01:10:00)

VC 3.06

Titus (0): none

Ranger

(1):

Masquerade

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(0): none

Masquerade

(4) [L-2]: RachMarie, Ollie,

Massive

,

killthestory

Nosferatu (0): none

Massive

(0): None
RachMarie (2) [L-4]:

MagnaofIllusion

, Titus
Ollie (0): none
not voting:

Ranger

, Imperium, Nosferatu
With 10 players alive, it takes 6 votes to lynch.
day 3 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-05-19 01:10:00)

VC 3.07

Titus (0): none

Ranger

(2):

Masquerade

,

MagnaofIllusion

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(0): none

Masquerade

(5) [L-1]: RachMarie, Ollie,

Massive

,

killthestory

, Titus
Nosferatu (0): none

Massive

(0): None
RachMarie (0): none
Ollie (0): none
not voting:

Ranger

, Imperium, Nosferatu
With 10 players alive, it takes 6 votes to lynch.
day 3 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-05-22 01:10:00)

VC 3.08

Titus (0): none

Ranger

(3) [L-3]:

Masquerade

,

MagnaofIllusion

, Imperium

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(0): none

Masquerade

(5) [L-1]: RachMarie, Ollie,

Massive

,

killthestory

, Titus
Nosferatu (0): none

Massive

(0): None
RachMarie (0): none
Ollie (0): none
not voting:

Ranger

, Nosferatu
With 10 players alive, it takes 6 votes to lynch.
day 3 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-05-22 01:10:00)

VC 3.08

Titus (0): none

Ranger

(3) [L-3]:

Masquerade

,

MagnaofIllusion

, Imperium

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(0): none

Masquerade

(6) [LYNCHED]: RachMarie, Ollie,

Massive

,

killthestory

, Titus,

Ranger

Nosferatu (0): none

Massive

(0): None
RachMarie (0): none
Ollie (0): none
not voting: Nosferatu
With 10 players alive, it takes 6 votes to lynch.
day 3 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-05-22 01:10:00)

VC 4.01

Titus (0): none

Ranger

(0): none

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(0): none
Nosferatu (0): none
RachMarie (0): none
Ollie (0): none
not voting:

Ranger

, Nosferatu,

MagnaofIllusion

, Imperium,

killthestory

, RachMarie, Ollie, Titus
With 8 players alive, it takes 5 votes to lynch.
day 4 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-06-04 18:00:00)

VC 4.02

Titus (0): none

Ranger

(1):

killthestory

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(0): none
Nosferatu (0): none
RachMarie (0): none
Ollie (0): none
No Lynch (1): RachMarie
not voting:

Ranger

, Nosferatu,

MagnaofIllusion

, Imperium, Ollie, Titus
With 8 players alive, it takes 5 votes to lynch.
day 4 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-06-04 18:00:00)

VC 4.03

Titus (0): none

Ranger

(1):

killthestory

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(0): none
Nosferatu (0): none
RachMarie (0): none
Ollie (0): none
No Lynch (2): RachMarie, Nosferatu
not voting:

Ranger

,

MagnaofIllusion

, Imperium, Ollie, Titus
With 8 players alive, it takes 5 votes to lynch.
day 4 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-06-04 18:00:00)

VC 4.04

Titus (0): none

Ranger

(1):

killthestory

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(0): none
Nosferatu (0): none
RachMarie (0): none
Ollie (0): none
No Lynch (1): Nosferatu
not voting:

Ranger

,

MagnaofIllusion

, Imperium, Ollie, Titus, RachMarie
With 8 players alive, it takes 5 votes to lynch.
day 4 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-06-04 18:00:00)

VC 4.05

Titus (0): none

Ranger

(3) [L-2]:

killthestory

, Titus, Nosferatu

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(0): none
Nosferatu (0): none
RachMarie (0): none
Ollie (0): none
No Lynch (0): none
not voting:

Ranger

,

MagnaofIllusion

, Imperium, Ollie, RachMarie
With 8 players alive, it takes 5 votes to lynch.
day 4 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-06-04 18:00:00)

VC 4.06

Titus (0): none

Ranger

(3) [L-2]:

killthestory

, Titus,

MagnaofIllusion

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(0): none
Nosferatu (0): none
RachMarie (0): none
Ollie (0): none
No Lynch (1): Nosferatu
not voting:

Ranger

, Imperium, Ollie, RachMarie
With 8 players alive, it takes 5 votes to lynch.
day 4 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-06-04 18:00:00)

VC 4.06

Titus (0): none

Ranger

(2) [L-3]:

killthestory

, Titus

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(0): none
Nosferatu (0): none
RachMarie (0): none
Ollie (0): none
No Lynch (1): Nosferatu
not voting:

Ranger

, Imperium, Ollie, RachMarie,

MagnaofIllusion

With 8 players alive, it takes 5 votes to lynch.
day 4 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-06-04 18:00:00)

VC 4.06

Titus (0): none

Ranger

(3) [L-2]:

killthestory

, Ollie,

MagnaofIllusion

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(0): none
Nosferatu (0): none
RachMarie (0): none
Ollie (0): none
No Lynch (1): Nosferatu
not voting:

Ranger

, Imperium, RachMarie, Titus
With 8 players alive, it takes 5 votes to lynch.
day 4 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-06-04 18:00:00)

VC 4.07

Titus (0): none

Ranger

(5) [LYNCHED]:

killthestory

, Ollie,

MagnaofIllusion

, Titus, Imperium

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(1):

Ranger

Nosferatu (0): none
RachMarie (0): none
Ollie (0): none
No Lynch (1): Nosferatu
not voting: RachMarie
With 8 players alive, it takes 5 votes to lynch.
day 4 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-06-04 18:00:00)

vote count 5.01

Titus (0): none

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(0): none
Nosferatu (0): none
RachMarie (0): none
Ollie (0): none
No Lynch (0): none
not voting: Titus,

MagnaofIllusion

, Imperium,

killthestory

, Nosferatu, RachMarie, Ollie
with 7 players alive, it takes 4 votes to lynch
day 5 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-06-20 16:00:00)

vote count 5.02

Titus (0): none

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(1):

MagnaofIllusion

Nosferatu (0): none
RachMarie (0): none
Ollie (0): none
No Lynch (0): none
not voting: Titus, Imperium,

killthestory

, Nosferatu, RachMarie, Ollie
with 7 players alive, it takes 4 votes to lynch
day 5 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-06-20 16:00:00)

vote count 5.02

Titus (0): none

MagnaofIllusion

(0): none
Imperium (0): none

killthestory

(1):

MagnaofIllusion

Nosferatu (0): none
RachMarie (0): none
Ollie (3) [L-1]: Imperium, RachMarie,

killthestory

No Lynch (0): none
not voting: Titus, Nosferatu, Ollie
with 7 players alive, it takes 4 votes to lynch
day 5 has begun, it will end in (expired on 2016-06-20 16:00:00)

[Nosferatu]

Titus, is there a reason why you're ignoring the game as hard as you are right now?

You try having my life. Yeah I am behind. I know. Did anyone do the colored VCs?

you may now be directed to the post below you at this time.

[Nosferatu]

@MoI: I was curious on how your VCA method worked since the method I usually use doesn't work as well in smaller games.

@Imperium: PoE. Ranger tried to argue Titus is scum and Ranger doesn't bus. I town read you and MoI/kill are conf town. Pretty sure I had another reason but I can't remember it now, it was about OW.

[Nosferatu]

*Ranger doesn't bus often(?)

[Nosferatu]

Yeah, I had never seen Ranger bus in any game before and she frequently talked about how she refused it, so in my mind I just had a concrete rule "Ranger doesn't bus".

[Nosferatu]

Is there anything else that you're waiting to get out of this day?

Not particularly.

[Nosferatu]

I really hate to backtrack on something I literally just said buuut

Titus, is there a reason why you're ignoring the game as hard as you are right now?

You try having my life. Yeah I am behind. I know. Did anyone do the colored VCs?

Do something with the VCs I coloured before I hammer. If you don't do it by around 5pm est tomorrow, I'm going to hammer and you will be scum immortalized in my mind.

[Nosferatu]

/surrender

There's about a zero percent chance of winning here. I needed Ollie to CC and that's when he had IRL.

There's little point in drawing this out wit Ollie hammered.

do something with the VCs anyway

[Nosferatu]

nosferatu what pronoun do you prefer?

i found myself shifting through she/he/they this game (and maybe in that order!) and tammy swears up and down that you said you were a she somewhere but not sure if i can trust her because she likes to troll a lot

you can really use whatever tbh

plus I feel a weird pleasure when people misgender me

[Nosferatu]

tfw I scum read 2/3 scum for shitty reasons and dropped them both because I couldn't substantiate it and with ollie the rest of the town started screaming at me

[Nosferatu]

I'm so bad

[Nosferatu]

I mean there was also the part where he belittled every single argument made against him with degrading comments and that infernal emoticon, but apparently everybody else figured that was town, and he made a post I agreed with; so I figured I must be wrong and I unvoted.

I have negative self-confidence