My thoughts on fireisredsir
- I was scumleaning them on d1. This was because they felt purposefully noncommital, especially around Ari in posts like
590 or
658. Looking back now, I don't think this point is as strong as I did back then - there is some backpedalling going on but Ari is scary in general and I don't think it's that consistent of a theme.
-I didn't really like their presence on FB and Eiralox because I thought they were both super easy pushes that created the impression of doing stuff and posting content without actually doing a whole lot for town. I still think this, and especially that the push on eiralox was kind of eh. Like - I think he was just drowning in post count and the nature of the large theme game, and I think it's pretty clear that in general his normal behaviour is going to be different to his behaviour where he's light years behind and has no idea what was going on. So in particular I think their push on Eira was uncharitable and potentially was initiated with the desire to build a wagon and making Fire look proactive?
- I think
1127 looks like town, because they seem to be leaving stuff on the table w/ Relly where I expect scum to, like, try make the pushes they feel like they can make at least somewhat genuinely?
- they were one of the people in ari's reads post. I don't think this matters too much? But it's a factor that I'm looking at because she had 5 scumreads and according to Scamper's Very Reliable Sources Datisi is town, and so fire and S_S as the other slots she was scumreading (CMM was wrong and VPB was right) should get a bit more scrutiny than other slots in my opinion. I also feel like Firebringer slot was scumread generically by people whereas Fireisredsir's slot was a lot more, deepwolfy? And so it would make more sense to kill to protect it.
- I don't like their progression on shea d2. I think coming into the day scumreading that slot (whereas d1 they seemed to strike an extremely neutral tone at all times), flipping around to a townlean and then going back to being cool w/ the Shea wagon feels... off to me. To elaborate;
3416 shows that they are leaning town on Shea - for what I consider to be good reasons, like that the way Shea progresses his reads is towny, and then just, pivots away from acknowledging that and leave it, eg in
3483 where they ask for scamper's thoughts on their point about shea - only to say they are cool with the shea wagon *before scamper even responds*. I know they do emphasise their uncertainty in that post but I don't know if that makes it better for me. I feel like they really emphasised that uncertainty to just an extreme degree because they wanted Shea to be eliminated at some point and didn't feel it was strategic to make a defense there? Because I feel like this is a good point they're making and they just forget all about it and go back to pushing Shea way too easily imo.
- I don't like
4844. I said I couldn't explain why at the time, mostly because it was a gut reaction, but I can give it a go - part of the reason it feels so slimy to me is that they're strongly pushing the narrative to look for scum off the hem wagon when they were someone who jumped on it. Something about the combination of doing x -> arguing that scum would never do x so quickly just bothers me. This wouldn't really matter if I thought this post from fire also makes sense coming from town, but I don't really think it does - sure, scum don't just hop on town wagons all the time, but they don't just avoid them either and I feel like fire knows this. I feel strongly the right answer is to look for scum both on and off the HEM wagon and I expect them to say this instead of acting like scum would just never turn around and jump on a wagon in that way.
- I also didn't like
5146. I also find this one hard to verbalise. I suppose it doesn't really seem natural - of course, it's always a possibility that duelling wagons are both red, but I don't understand what they're trying to do just bringing up this possibility. It feels like they're pretty much willing to push whoever's viable - which yes sounds like a surface level reason to scumread someone, but consider
1) while doing this they have been advocating that scum wouldn't play in this manner and have likely been playing around that
2) pushing eliminations is just... good for scum, and if endgaming isn't specifically the highest priority on their agenda right now - for example, if they had a partner more townread to them - I think it makes more sense to aggressively try to advance the scum wincon, while also not really creating associatives by pushing back against any wagons that might actually be scum
3) maybe this goes too deep into theory but like, I don't think you can really say "scum wouldn't be opportunistic because that burns their towncred" if you advocate that being opportunistic shouldn't lose people towncred???
- I think their interactions with VPB can be s/s easily.
162 feels kinda distancey but that's early game so whatever.
519 is kind of discouraging me from pushing VPB, which slightly rubs me the wrong way but again whatever. The main point that makes me think this is Not Good is that they seem to not really address VPB for most of the day or while he was being pushed?? Like, they scumread VPB starting in
2264 but by that point I think CMM and Dann were kinda just the duelling wagons? And any danger to VPB had passed. VPB seems to ask fire a few questions but like, I'm not sure there's much of substance there? Their interactions aren't positive, but don't really seem to be threatening to each other either. I think their interactions are +scum for fire here.
- I'm putting this at the back because I don't feel super confident on this point and feel sort of dumb bringing it up, but it kind of feels like they were encouraging me to scumread marci?? in
624 when I say town marci would feel more tonally spunky they say "I could buy that." This really does not mean anything on its own but when combined with
3096 where they do the same thing on d2, and their overall progression on marci - they call her town early d1, drop that and pretty much hold her as a consistent scumread without really justifying it at all - I think it feels suspicious.
I'm tired and finishing this early; I think there are maybe some points to be made in fire's favour that I haven't really pondered too much here, like read fluidity is generally an indicator of town and even though I think it could be scum motivated in this case I don't *know* how reliable that is because I don't think I've ever read a slot as playing scum in this manner before? But overall I think fire is pretty scummy yeah and I'm tired so I'm leaving it here, I think it's long enough as it is. Sorry for not being articulate as was hoped, but at least I didn't do nothing right?
No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.