(icecream is okay too)
In post 12, mn wrote:Golden Robster is mafia.
VOTE: mn
Why aren't you voting GR, then?
In post 12, mn wrote:Golden Robster is mafia.
In post 16, mn wrote:Why would I?
In post 104, mn wrote:This game Is stagnant. We Must move It forward.
VOTE: Keyser Söze Let us remove the Annoying player.
In post 122, Masquerade wrote:In post 120, KainTepes wrote:OK A QUICK LOOK AT ROBOSTER SHOWS ME HE IS PROBABLY TOWN... UNVOTE:
OCEANWIND IS SUSPICIOUS VOTE: OCEANWIND
MN IS NULL
Do you plan to sue capitals all game? I'm shouting your posts in my head while I'm reading them and it's annoying (the shouting in my head I mean)
Also, that's all you have to add?
In post 166, Masquerade wrote:I always have a slow start. I get scumread a lot for it early in the game. It's getting boring.
In post 175, Slandaar wrote:In post 152, KainTepes wrote:TRUE... now that I think about it...SCUM would want not so good players to be alive as LONG as possibleso they can trick them later when people are fewer... bad town players want policy lynches...
So mn is not scum...
UNVOTE: mn
my tummy still HURTS... will think more when it STOPS HURTING...
All seriousness - We are talking about policy lynching keyser here who, might not be the best (I don't know), but he doesn't come across as bad. I don't really think changing a read based on the idea scum wouldn't want to lynch keyser because he isn't a great player is very town-like shall we say.
In post 205, Masquerade wrote:@Aquanim: ... it's not hard to figure out the answer to your 2nd question.
In post 216, OceanWind wrote:
Sorry, stuff came up and I'm really tired and not feeling up to playing mafia at the moment. I'm going to have to give it a couple of days and then I'll re-read the thread and get back into the game.
In post 291, Keyser Söze wrote:Don't worry KainTepes, I won't be voting you. I don't believe in easy lynches.
...
In post 300, KainTepes wrote:THIS is TERRIBLE.... BBT LOOKS SO MUCH MORE INACTIVE THIS GAME THAN IN ALL THE GAMES WHERE HE IS TOWN,, I WILL NOT GIVE HIM ANY MORE CHANCES..............
VOTE: BLUE BLOODED TOFFEE
In post 311, Phoenix Wright wrote:
...
I think that this post is really bad. It didn't look like Golden Rpbster was defending mn. Somebody wanting mm replaced because of their playstyle is kind of drastic, so it's weird that ocean wind isn't acknowledging that at all. There's no accusatory tone and he isn't acting like masquerade isn't town. So Oceanwind is just trying really hard to get golden robster lynched. What do you think about it?
In post 362, popsofctown wrote:KainTepes is town but that's obvi
In post 265, Aquanim wrote:I don't see any reason for town-Kain to post #206, short of him deliberately trolling us.
If Kain hasn't read the thread, why does he feel the need to make the claim nobody is talking about him?
In post 368, popsofctown wrote:town-Kain is suspicious of everyone, even people not trying to mislynch him and Phoenix Wrought. It's very healthy mistrust.
In post 370, popsofctown wrote:Because his stomach hurts.
In post 373, popsofctown wrote:I'm pretty sure KT will verify my response himself.
In post 377, popsofctown wrote:I don't see the scum narrative. His scum strategy is to skip reading the thread and draw attention to himself? I don't believe he's played 1000 games of "town of salem" but I believe he's played 10. You're not really painting me a very believable picture, your just pushing an easy day 1 VI lynch.
In post 381, popsofctown wrote:Kain is really taking the "hide" out of hide and seek, Aquanim. He posts frequently, in all caps, and posts even if he has nothing about the game of which to speak.
In post 387, popsofctown wrote:That was a characterization of what Aquanim had just told me.
In post 389, popsofctown wrote:In post 388, TellTaleHeart wrote:In post 381, popsofctown wrote:Kain is really taking the "hide" out of hide and seek, Aquanim. He posts frequently, in all caps, and posts even if he has nothing about the game of which to speak.
Thisseems more relevant to personality than alignment.
And iirc someone said he's played more chillaxedly in a different game where he was town, and he's even less concerned with keeping a low profile this game. Assuming this game is the one where he's drawn scum would be a Too Scummy To Be Scum argument.
In post 392, popsofctown wrote:I just can't give the much masterminding credit to someone who thinks ice cream is a good idea for an upset stomach.
In post 395, popsofctown wrote:How much attention one draws to oneself should indeed be based on meta, but Kain is exceeding even his own meta in terms of suicidal flashy behavior, so it should be seen as alignment indicative.
In post 400, popsofctown wrote:Given what he posted, no. Either way, I don't think it's alignment indicative. If he said no one was talking about him, I think there is a 99.99% chance that's what he believed to be the case.
...
In post 405, popsofctown wrote:I'd argue Kain's 127 is more protown than everything he posted in that other game combined. Either way, he did far less to spotlight himself that game.
In post 127, KainTepes wrote:In post 124, mn wrote:Let us policy lynch and move on.
now he is SCUM
VOTE: mn
In post 110, KainTepes wrote:Also I am Mafia Suicide Bomber so both Not_mafia and xotxm is lying
In post 414, popsofctown wrote:I can't imagine any way to draw attention to yourself faster than "why is nobody talking about me". You can't even upgrade it by saying "talk about me" because then it no longer has the snazzy passive aggresion.
In post 415, Aquanim wrote:Oops, wrong way around.
Kain positively APED the spotlight in his other game. Here he jumped on mn, who was about as boring and safe a target as you can get.
In post 129, KainTepes wrote:I dont see a reason to LYNCH anyone rn, period... its hardly been 2 days into the game...
In post 418, popsofctown wrote:I think anyone young enough to expect that plan to work doesn't have internet access yet.
In post 425, GuyFawkes wrote:In post 420, Aquanim wrote:In post 418, popsofctown wrote:I think anyone young enough to expect that plan to work doesn't have internet access yet.
Then give me another plausible explanation of why Kain made that post.
Do you think Kain is legit or is it some sort of gimmick alt?
In post 430, GuyFawkes wrote:In post 429, Aquanim wrote:If I started deciding not to lynch people with the rationale of "what if they're" I'd never lynch anybody.a townie consciously trying to throw
Maybe I'm giving him too much credit but I don't think that's the case here.
In post 435, GuyFawkes wrote:In post 434, Aquanim wrote:Make #206 make sense to me as a post by a townie who isn't deliberately trying to screw over the game.
I don't care about reasons it was bad for him to do it as scum, I care about a reason why he *would* do it as town.
I'm waiting.
because its part of his gimmick... why are you taking that post so serious yet ignoring other posts like where he voted for the freaking mod?
In post 437, GuyFawkes wrote:
...
you are just missing the joke in 206
"WHY ISNO ONE TALKING ABOUT ME...." when people WERE talking about him.
Given that it extends over multiple posts, there's a fairly straightforward reason why scum would want to project that impression, and Kain never engaged with the scum reads made on him before that point, I do not buy this as an innocent joke. (I also don't see how it's funny.)In post 219, KainTepes wrote:I WILL READ MORE BACKWARD...but i have a SHORT ATTENTION SPAN and my memory is not VERY GOOD also my tummy just got better............. I WILL READ SOON....
In post 268, Masquerade wrote:@Aquanim: Just the one post where he seems to have reason. I don't completely agree with his reads but it shows he put thought into it.
...
In post 476, TellTaleHeart wrote:In post 474, Aquanim wrote:That being said, you played against scum-Keyser in Mini Normal 1719 - my feel-read of that game is that he was a lot less assertive about his opinions as compared to Mini 1744 where I saw him as town, and this game is feeling more like the latter than the former to me. You played in the first game so you might have a different perspective; if so I'd like to hear it.
I assume you have signatures turned off.
In post 483, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:...
Is this you saying that you think Keyser has been assertive with his opinion this game? If so, show me some examples.
In post 485, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:...
and the fact he went back to a null read should tell you something. ...
In post 487, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:It shows 'effort' in an attempt to make reads. It shows a pro-active attitude. It shows an attempt to scum hunt.
But this all falls flat on it's face when it always ends with a null read and a serious lack of committment and conviction.
Agree or disagree?
In post 494, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Firstly, you're assuming all scum think everything through that they do; this isn't the case.