What a nice way to say welcome back.In post 550, lane0168 wrote:Stop lurking farside
Missed you too.
I'll get to this game tomorrow.
Night, night.
What a nice way to say welcome back.In post 550, lane0168 wrote:Stop lurking farside
You want to explain why your protecting RC?In post 571, Something_Smart wrote:558 is ugly.
Farside, is your RC read meta based? Because I don't really see it.I don't think this is really a strong tell for most people... especially for experienced players like RC who can for sure pretend to scumhunt as scum if they want to.In post 555, farside22 wrote:RC'so long post was just lots of words without really.......Scum hunting. It read as more sociable if that makes sense.These points are also pretty weak and seem to be grasping at straws themselves.
@Infinity: please stop treating MM a total newb; that seems to be the picture you're painting, but it's been established that he isn't. What of his narrative doesn't make sense from scum who has experience on another forum? And what was particularly open or relaxed about farside's catchup?
I've got FAQ2, rc, Quibix especially.infinity wrote: faq2, why is lane scummy for going all in if his partner isn't mm? No one other than mm called him.
Scum is in {faq2, bbt, fire} with an off chance of rc, persivul, or qubixes
AtE: A shit buzzword people use whenever town is frustrated.
HI my love, sorry you drew scum this game.In post 563, RedCoyote wrote:we
mm was finding lane scum early in the game, his agreement and repeat of others could be just glad someone else was catching on.
What do you mean by this?
I think your wrong to do so.In post 578, Infinity 324 wrote:Farside, what did you think of my back off of RC?
Sorry mod, but I'll be V/LA from july 10th to july 16th
Calling lane scum.In post 580, Fire Assassin wrote:Yes my reading comprehensions skills need some work.
@Farside what do you mean about my instincts sucking?
Hypocritical. I hate when people say a case is weak but make no cases themselves or is more about meta and instinct and let's duck around and vote some player without explaining why.In post 583, Infinity 324 wrote:I'm bored and this game is going nowhere. Someone talk to me about s_s
In post 589, The MM wrote:You're making a misassumption. I'm only saying "you are scum" with no backup to the claim as an imitation of him to prove how his argumentary sucks. Everything else you need to know about what I think of him is in my previous posts anyway.In post 588, farside22 wrote:Mm: why are you scum reading fire?
In post 590, Infinity 324 wrote:Was more looking to have a discussion on mm than to have someone make a case, but what mm did was helpful (thanks). I still have a strong gut town read on s_s I can't shake.
qubixes is null town for me because his thoughts are organic and well-reasoned (not simplistic), even though I often disagree with them.
Yah I like being killed n1.
Dances on lineIn post 597, RedCoyote wrote:Also, farside, you must act on your poker hand in your next post or you will get scum points from me. Same with Wingback. I'm putting you two on notice.
I didn't say I was.In post 615, RedCoyote wrote:I don't expect you to speak for either of them, Infinity. I'll hear them out. I may be convinced to pivot yet. I'm definitely not a diehard MMscum proponent.In post 611, Infinity 324 wrote:Lane made quite a good case on faq2 earlier, I'm not good at making cases cause a lot of my thinking is based on gut, so
Idk if we can convince qubixes to join the faq2 wagon since he seems to be tunneling on mm, but we can try
Yes, I do think he is scummier.In post 611, Infinity 324 wrote:Do you think mm is scummier than faq2? What type of impression do you get of mm's personality that would explain his rather bold and not very careful actions as noob scum? (I'd like everyone who's on the mm wagon to answer that)
To reiterate (it's probably good I do this since my original rationale is buried in posts from a while back), he really, really overplayed the newbie card (see: 88), his suspicions of lane originally proved hypcritical (see: 106), and q's comment in 98 was very much on point. He explains why MM acted irrationally in his betting as town. Poker /= Mafia. It has nothing to do with being new to Mafia.
Not the best case against someone that I've ever seen, but it's good enough.
---
Oh, please. Better yet, I'll translate that from American to English for you: Come off it. I don't want to hear this WIFOM stuff. I do not get this scum mastermind impression from Fire Assassin at all. He's a smart guy, but that's a bridge too far. "FA did something silly, got called out on it, acknowledged he got called out on it, just so he could later refer back to that as a scum trick!" That's just too much.In post 612, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Because it's designed to do exactly what it just did. Get town reads.
---
Yeah, and that's what we've just been talking about, dear.In post 613, farside22 wrote:Not sure if you paid attention or don't care but fire was asking about throwing the poker hands to those that are town reads, which I like the idea and your not a town read.
Also wing has made exactly one post thus far get over it.
So you're deliberately electing to prolong the hand and not make a move, hm?
How can you not have a strong scum read by now? I recall from my read through you've played mafia a few times.In post 617, The MM wrote:Fire is just - shall I say - the player I'm the most disposed to dispose of. I don't have a scumread strong enough to commit to yet.
BBT, Wingback, FAQ, RC and qubixes are the other ones I feel less town than the rest. But none of them ticks me as much as Fire right now.
I think it's a good idea to let someone I town read win a pot.In post 661, lane0168 wrote:Farside better not be delaying hands tomorrow. Not afraid to vote someone over that either
In post 665, lane0168 wrote:If we're doing the chip dumping plan, then I agree. But if we're not, like today, quit delaying play.In post 662, farside22 wrote:I think it's a good idea to let someone I town read win a pot.In post 661, lane0168 wrote:Farside better not be delaying hands tomorrow. Not afraid to vote someone over that either
Not sure why you disagree.
No, what is weak is having no funding scum reads at this point in the game.In post 682, Infinity 324 wrote:This is a weak as hell meta reason, especially because mm came under a ton of pressure right from the beginning of the game.In post 668, farside22 wrote:Also I did my research on TheMM and the one game he played on MS was much more thoughtful then the one he is playing here. Plus he had scum reads for reason's in that game.
Adding him onto my scum list.
Dafuq is this, decide one or the other. Then that person should claim.In post 677, lane0168 wrote:Intent to hammer either one of those
Also, I would very much like you not to actually hammer until I get some questions answered. Thanks.
PEdit: @Fire, what exactly about faq2 makes you think he's flipping town? Is it that his wagon has scum on it, or what?
There is a huge difference between you two.In post 687, Infinity 324 wrote:I don't have very many scum reads either, that doesn't make mm scum. He seems to be actively trying to scum hunt at least, despite the pressure on him.
Also fire I know you're on dude please answer my question
Which players jumped on FAQ2?In post 688, Fire Assassin wrote:They can be, but I am not reading him as anything, it just reads as an easy lynch and he is null which lends me to believe he is more likely a mislynch than anything.In post 684, Infinity 324 wrote:Why can't low hanging fruit be scum? Apparently you're reading him as null based on his play, so...
I could be wrong, but thats just my read of it looking in, not particularly care for the people who jump on it, but I don't think any of them are ore scummy for it.
I notice that image asked FAQ what other reasons he had for scum reading lane, which FAQ doesn't respond to and then finds a weak reason to stick with lane as scumIn post 701, FA_Q2 wrote:Ill preface this with the fact that I am extreemy drunk but I am going to post anyway so whatever...
I gave other reasons. You are misrepping. This is bullshit.In post 664, Infinity 324 wrote:
You think lane is scum because of the bluff, yet it makes no sense to bluff without your partner calling. If lane is scum with someone other than mm, then the bluff still wasn't scum-motivated and a silly mistake just as if he was town.
Do you have anyotherreasons why lane is scum, or are you just going to continue to pretend to scumhunt using the same BS logic from page 10?
Bullshit. replacing out is NAI period. reading into it more without some sort of reasoning is reaching and asinine.In post 669, Something_Smart wrote:Wrong.In post 657, FA_Q2 wrote:Replacing out is NAI end of story. I have heard this bullshit over and over again about one replace out is scummy or one is town and they are virtually always random. Replacing out for personal reasons or because you do not enjoy playing with a particular player/play style does not suddenly evaporate when you are scum or town. Nice try though.^ scum right here.In post 680, lane0168 wrote:I seem to be pretty universally townread. If that's not the case then whoever doesn't believe it can hammer before me. But I fully intend to be on the lynch wagon today
VOTE: lane
Lane is clearly trying to justify simply hammering whoever gets to L-1. This tells me that he does not care who is lynched.
Do you disagree with my points against FAQ?In post 706, Something_Smart wrote:@FA: q = qubixes.
I will say that I feel really bad about my top scumreads both being easy mislynches. I think there is a decent probability that one or both of them will flip town. Tomorrow, regardless of who we lynch and what they flip, I want to look in the players controlling the discussion, particularly farside.
I once played a game where I had to replace out because I saw my friend posting in the scum PT. Now if I had shared that reason with the town, do you still think it would have been NAI?In post 701, FA_Q2 wrote:Bullshit. replacing out is NAI period. reading into it more without some sort of reasoning is reaching and asinine.In post 669, Something_Smart wrote:Wrong.In post 657, FA_Q2 wrote:Replacing out is NAI end of story. I have heard this bullshit over and over again about one replace out is scummy or one is town and they are virtually always random. Replacing out for personal reasons or because you do not enjoy playing with a particular player/play style does not suddenly evaporate when you are scum or town. Nice try though.
In post 709, The MM wrote:From the recent posts I don't feel that FA_Q2 is scum, so, for farside, you have my best reason not to vote him. My vote is fine on Fire Assassin because the more I attempt to look for towncred in his posts, the less I find. Besides, arguing on my lynch with Infinity (who I have a soft townread on) seems really far-fetched: shouldn't he try to argue with me instead? No, instead he tries to just push people to wagon for me rather than asking for some defense.
I have this soft scumread on lane like a pinch on my side because my soft townread on him melted like dog poop after I saw his eagerness to hammer. That's a really easy excuse for scum to hide and be like: "I CALLED IT I'M TOWN!". Town just don't hammer like that, without at least calling out to the lynch target, even if we're close to deadline.
Also, I think farside is in too good a position right now. I get a feel that she's just going around questioning everybody and being low on responsiveness compared to all the questioning.
Here, you have them, my three top scumreads. Wingback and BBT might be there due to inactivity making it borderline impossible to find out if they were scum.
I'm not too confident is qubixes, FA_Q2 and RedCoyote, but I feel that they're just a bit too serious and that makes me not like their vibes, so they are actually soft townreads.
Infinity feels a bit too nice to me, white-knighting and whatnot, but he's still my top townread because I doubt he's scum hiding behind that to make a friend of me: that wouldn't be an effective move to make for scum.
I'm not always a chatty person because when I get in the mix I usually become a raging batch.In post 710, Something_Smart wrote:@farside:
I don't disagree with your points against FAQ, I just have a gut feeling that he might flip town, and I don't feel as confident on him as I have on wagons in the past.
I'm throwing shade on nobody for pushing him. I believe there is almost definitely one scum in the players currently receiving no pressure, I scumread your predecessor, and I haven't been super impressed by your posts thus far.
I was in a game where town!lane quickhammered town with no warning or indication that he would do so, nowhere near deadline, and the game mechanic made it that because he cut the day short scum won after the following night. (Fortunately I was scum ) And we've already seen that he's impulsive. So in this case, yes, town might do that.In post 709, The MM wrote:Town just don't hammer like that, without at least calling out to the lynch target, even if we're close to deadline.
So your voting someone that is slightly scummy over a scum read?In post 723, Something_Smart wrote:@farside if that question was for me, I never said I thought Fire was scum. In fact recently I have been leaning slightly scum on him, but regardless he's too self-aware of a player to be sorted simply by whether or not he's voting a given player.
@MM I know you don't like to be pushed around, but at this point it's basically you or him. (And I'm not trying to scare you or threaten you, it's just the truth.) If we pushed another wagon now, it would cast significant suspicion on both you and FA and probably lead to both of you getting lynched anyway and on top of that it would probably flip town. No lynching is mathematically (going from odds to evens is bad) and mechanically (fewer associations and more easy mislynches still around) inferior even to mislynching.
In post 710, Something_Smart wrote:@farside:
I don't disagree with your points against FAQ, I just have a gut feeling that he might flip town, and I don't feel as confident on him as I have on wagons in the past.
I'm throwing shade on nobody for pushing him. I believe there is almost definitely one scum in the players currently receiving no pressure, I scumread your predecessor, and I haven't been super impressed by your posts thus far.
I was in a game where town!lane quickhammered town with no warning or indication that he would do so, nowhere near deadline, and the game mechanic made it that because he cut the day short scum won after the following night. (Fortunately I was scum ) And we've already seen that he's impulsive. So in this case, yes, town might do that.In post 709, The MM wrote:Town just don't hammer like that, without at least calling out to the lynch target, even if we're close to deadline.
In post 706, Something_Smart wrote:@FA: q = qubixes.
I will say that I feel really bad about my top scumreads both being easy mislynches. I think there is a decent probability that one or both of them will flip town. Tomorrow, regardless of who we lynch and what they flip, I want to look in the players controlling the discussion, particularly farside.
I once played a game where I had to replace out because I saw my friend posting in the scum PT. Now if I had shared that reason with the town, do you still think it would have been NAI?In post 701, FA_Q2 wrote:Bullshit. replacing out is NAI period. reading into it more without some sort of reasoning is reaching and asinine.In post 669, Something_Smart wrote:Wrong.In post 657, FA_Q2 wrote:Replacing out is NAI end of story. I have heard this bullshit over and over again about one replace out is scummy or one is town and they are virtually always random. Replacing out for personal reasons or because you do not enjoy playing with a particular player/play style does not suddenly evaporate when you are scum or town. Nice try though.
Sorry I just realized I had a quote from MM that I thought S_S posted.
In post 778, RedCoyote wrote:You know we're both town here, darlingIn post 777, farside22 wrote:Every post MM makes reads like he'said talking out of his ass
I'd be terrified as scum with that type of town block.In post 781, RedCoyote wrote:Code: Select all
A townbloc of me, farside, Infinity and lane ... <3 <3 <3...
zzz...
zzz...
Huh? Oh, sorry, I was dreaming for a second.
I've called them both scum but someone said they were mislynches.In post 790, Something_Smart wrote:What do people think about my points against MM/FA? I thought they were pretty noteworthy but people seem to just be ignoring them.
Will you flip town?In post 806, FA_Q2 wrote:Will it be fine after my town flip?In post 802, Infinity 324 wrote:O...k
That'll probably be fine, to be honest
I just never like hammers without a claim
I tend to overthink things and I had a theory i was looking into when I had time.In post 828, Shadow_step wrote:This is a very self conscious post.
You didn't want to vote anyone....yeah okay, but why do you feel the need to say that..?
There is a bullet proof ability to be had.In post 822, Shadow_step wrote:Seriously??!!In post 821, Fire Assassin wrote:We should all be following the plan of betting and giving the hands to our townread.
Right now I am curious on that kill?
BBT wasn't really trying in the game if my memory serves right.
If you give a lot of money to a single player and IF they are town, scum know who they should NK.
If your townread is scum then lol.
See things you can buy on front page.In post 846, lane0168 wrote:Over 1000. 1160 I think. Won 1170 and folded 2 Antes. Why?
Sure.In post 850, lane0168 wrote:I've seen them all. I looked again. It'd be helpful if you just said what you were trying to say.
In post 856, lane0168 wrote:He can't afford it... So what about it?
That's why I asked about money.In post 857, lane0168 wrote:And why would you do it in mm's spot?
Vengeful is a day ability.In post 868, Fire Assassin wrote:Vengeful doesn't work for night kills though, right?
Reads off.ould afford it. It cost 1000$, I had 1160 or something. So yes, I bought
In post 900, lane0168 wrote:Good catch. But only the people on the lynch got money. I got 80
There is 3 players who haven't said anything since game start.In post 909, lane0168 wrote:What is going on? Why is everyone so quiet?
In post 778, RedCoyote wrote:You know we're both town here, darlingIn post 777, farside22 wrote:Every post MM makes reads like he'said talking out of his ass
In post 916, RedCoyote wrote:I guess you just skimmed over the part where I said I had to essentially rethink my entire game and throw D1 out the window. Two of my biggest scumreads just flipped town.
In post 706, Something_Smart wrote:@FA: q = qubixes.
I will say that I feel really bad about my top scumreads both being easy mislynches. I think there is a decent probability that one or both of them will flip town. Tomorrow, regardless of who we lynch and what they flip, I want to look in the players controlling the discussion, particularly farside.
I once played a game where I had to replace out because I saw my friend posting in the scum PT. Now if I had shared that reason with the town, do you still think it would have been NAI?In post 701, FA_Q2 wrote:Bullshit. replacing out is NAI period. reading into it more without some sort of reasoning is reaching and asinine.In post 669, Something_Smart wrote:Wrong.In post 657, FA_Q2 wrote:Replacing out is NAI end of story. I have heard this bullshit over and over again about one replace out is scummy or one is town and they are virtually always random. Replacing out for personal reasons or because you do not enjoy playing with a particular player/play style does not suddenly evaporate when you are scum or town. Nice try though.
In post 925, Something_Smart wrote:Again, who was I blaming for a possible mislynch?In post 922, farside22 wrote:I'm referring to this post, pre-flip.
In post 706, Something_Smart wrote:@FA: q = qubixes.
I will say that I feel really bad about my top scumreads both being easy mislynches. I think there is a decent probability that one or both of them will flip town. Tomorrow, regardless of who we lynch and what they flip, Iwant to look in the players controlling the discussion, particularly farside.
I once played a game where I had to replace out because I saw my friend posting in the scum PT. Now if I had shared that reason with the town, do you still think it would have been NAI?In post 701, FA_Q2 wrote:Bullshit. replacing out is NAI period. reading into it more without some sort of reasoning is reaching and asinine.In post 669, Something_Smart wrote:Wrong.In post 657, FA_Q2 wrote:Replacing out is NAI end of story. I have heard this bullshit over and over again about one replace out is scummy or one is town and they are virtually always random. Replacing out for personal reasons or because you do not enjoy playing with a particular player/play style does not suddenly evaporate when you are scum or town. Nice try though.
Sorry about that.In post 930, Fire Assassin wrote:Bet $40
I have no idea why everyone is folding when we can organize this much better.
Just frustrating me and I am probably going to stop talking about this mechanic and just focusing on scumhunting.
I have town reads on Lane and Wingback,
I feel pretty confident on those, I am thinking that MM is scum, but unsure of allies still.
Something Smart possibly not sure on who with?
Farside I am null on but I could possibly see it.
TOo many preflip asosciations.
I say we flip MM today and if we are wrong we can reaccess.
ANyone elses thoughts? (Not on the poker mechanics that we obviously can't do)
FireIn post 932, RedCoyote wrote:Who originally had the idea to combine monies?
How many 13 player games have 3 scum members?In post 936, RedCoyote wrote:In post 935, Something_Smart wrote:What makes you think there are three scum?