Let's see...Arcangel and Seraphim = Angelic names, they can be town for now. Hm. Grapes = Grapes of Wrath = Wrath = Evil = Kill it.
VOTE: Grapes
In post 28, Glass wrote:@Elbirn
Do you subscribe to the idea submitted by farside in post 18? (ie. you find it suspect that mollie replaced out when she did).
If so, why do you think it is more likely that mollie would replace out as scum than as town?
Do you think Farside knows enough about Mollie to accurately deduce what would make her feel busy/overwhelmed?
@lufan
If it was Farside's post that piqued your interest, I would like your answers as well.
In post 33, Katsuki wrote:Who knows. She recently replaced out of other games too so it may be a sitewide thing.
Lets lynch AA first, then I will discuss what our optimal strat this game is.
In post 41, SXTLHGaiden wrote:We no lynch until the Angel's kill doesn't go through.
Then the Angel claims and we are reduced to mountainous w/ a bulletproof IC who still has all the input of all the dead town.
We get no sin until then so the sin counter only goes up from that point.
In post 122, grapes wrote:
In post 114, Elbirn wrote:What even is this
A scum read.
On that note do you happen to have any of your own? You seem content so far putting most of you energy into speculating why mollie replaced out. Which at the end of the day is wifom..
In post 229, The Bulge wrote:Why are our votes so spread out :/
Our biggest wagon right now is 2? Now I'm not saying we should rush a lynch because the whole sin mechanic makes that riskier than usual. But it worries me that we haven't come close to any sort of consensus yet or even a pressure wagon. Is this because of the mechanic or are we just unable to get our shit together?
VOTE: Elbirn
In post 234, lufan131 wrote:Every hour someone says "Why'd u vote glass? What do you mean you checked?"
I'm sick of answering it.
In post 247, farside22 wrote:
Scum reading elb currently. Comes across as uncertain compared to the last game we played together he pushed what he felt.
In post 246, Sakura Hana wrote:Also could someone please explain to me what's the deal with Elbirn? i don't see why he's being wagonedm he asked what was the problem was with mollie's replace out and got his question answered so he decided to follow suit, am i missing something super obvious or what.
In post 269, lalaladucks wrote:In post 254, Elbirn wrote:In post 247, farside22 wrote:
Scum reading elb currently. Comes across as uncertain compared to the last game we played together he pushed what he felt.
Scumreading Elbirn is a towntell.
In post 246, Sakura Hana wrote:Also could someone please explain to me what's the deal with Elbirn? i don't see why he's being wagonedm he asked what was the problem was with mollie's replace out and got his question answered so he decided to follow suit, am i missing something super obvious or what.
Defending Elbirn is a scumtell.
Because you're scummy?
Are you actually for real or is this a joke?
Their hydra was in fact liking your slot at the start of the game around Post 119, and let's see what they flipped:
In post 0, goodmorning wrote:Valkyrie Mollie, Borogove, Vanilla Town, survived.
Now here's another fun fact from that game:
In post 336, BRantz wrote:So Tier what is your case against Elbirn?
In post 0, goodmorning wrote:BRantz, Mome Rath, Vanilla Town, lynched Day 1.
The bolded from that game doesnt really mesh well with what you just stated, in your post, in addition:In post 372, Elbirn wrote:To TSO. you said nothing but good things about me, then threw it out the windown with "elbirn trys Too hard to be town"? Literally what? If you read any of my gamesyou'd see I play this way every game.
In post 374, T S O wrote:I am saying the playstyle you use is easy to townread
Was directed at you, in which case, why do you find it a scumtell for people defending you?, it doesnt make any sense, while he wasnt exactly townreading you, he said your playstyle was "Easy to townread" so walk me through why you'd think town wouldn't defend you then? Oh right, they would.
In post 382, Witness Protection wrote:Elbirn - Town read, asking good questions.
In post 0, goodmorning wrote:Witness Protection, Nameless Hero, Town Sword-Holder, survived.
3/3 so far, where's the scum Townreading/Defending you.
With at least these 3 townies townreading you/defending you, I'm surprised you didn't push them at all on that game because apparently defending you is a scumtell, which makes me believe you're full of BS
You went and at least read your scumspect's meta of at least 1 game, to notice that he was probably town and defend it, You had 1 game with mollie and didn't even analyze their meta or checked another game to confirm what farside and Equinox had mentioned here.
- You are being very passive in here because apparently you don't have any scumreads, but there you kept your vote on someone at least during D1, even if it was your RVS vote, here you removed your vote when you got attacked and haven't placed it anywhere.
In post 278, Sakura Hana wrote:In post 277, Sakura Hana wrote:and haven't placed it anywhere.
Actually you did place it on lufan, but i don't see you "throwing tantrums and what nots" to get others to follow you.
In post 287, Equinox wrote:
Elbirn, it seems from post 279 that you are reading Sakura Hana as scum. If that's the case, do you think the motivation to go through someone's old games would be more likely to come from scum, more likely to come from town, or neither (please specify)? Why?
In post 113, Elbirn wrote:As pointed out by everyone else, this isn't really the best idea. But I feel like this was put out there with good intentions, and on a surface level it makes sense; we lose if we get sin, so let's ensure that we can't get sin. Leaning town on Gaiden.
What makes you feel that SXTLHGaiden was pushing his plan with "good intentions"?
In post 336, farside22 wrote:Before I forget my scum read on elb as I said is part meta but first you have as I said prior his back off of the wagon when push by Equinox here he says Me or Mollie well enough.
The very next he ask glass about mollie
Wtf response will he have replacing the spot? I sure don't know grapes, does he know Mollie better?
Plus the questions he's asked this far are pure fluff questions that I can't see giving any alignment info.
As for the other game we were in I was town reading elb early I recall in the game, don't remember why, but I do remember an early town read on him that game.
In post 342, grapes wrote:Not all that interested in an Elbirn lynch. Some of his posts rub me the wrong way but they're more a clash of character than anything I think. I'm sure Elbirn is a decent dude but he does come of as an asshole so far for whatever reason.
Other than that his content is alright though. I can follow his thought process pretty well and he's answered substantially for most things thrown at him.
@Sakura, you seem to enjoy meta. At least that's what I gather from a good chunk of your posts. However you should know that it doesn't hold much weight for me, I'm not faulting you for using it for leads and such.
But just because I don't agree with using it, at least a lot of the time, doesn't mean that I can't see it being misused.
Taking examples from one game and comparing it here is faulty logic. People change and especially if you consider join date, people can get better or change play style fairly quickly, even from back to back games right?
#277 is a good example of cherry picking one game and using it to paint somebody scum. It felt to me like you had already figured Elbirn for scum before you even made that post, which is odd considering he was a null read for you on that very same page.
In post 363, Sakura Hana wrote:
While my townread on lufan has so much as dissapearead since the start of the game, i'm not really enthusiastic about voting in a wagon 2 of my scumreads are voting in.
In post 453, Glass wrote:@Elbirn
I see you promoting the lufan wagon, but what do you think about the AA wagon?
In post 462, Katsuki wrote:We are not no-lynching today.
I still haven't had a chance to discuss optimal strat but I was planning on holding off until tomorrow so.
In post 490, Katsuki wrote:In post 488, Sakura Hana wrote:Btw Katsuki what i am rather interested in is why you are "unable" to discuss your supposed super pro town strategy before AA9 is lynched
The strat is independent to AA. I just think it'd be more productive to lay out my strat tomorrow as oppose to today.
Only reason I didn't state it at game start was that I wanted to see what you guys would say so I could analyze but obviously I'm not gonna catch up on stuff I didn't read and there's actually a fair amount of content to discuss that I don't need to throw more stuff into the mix.
Think of it as that I think there are obvious scum that need lynching and that I don't want to muddle the pool with optimal strategy talk. I will definitely talk about it tomorrow because it needs to happen then.
In post 518, Equinox wrote:
In the same post, RedCoyote wrote:+1 for 386, but she needs to connect the dots for me on Elbrin.
Which dots? The vote switch was way back in post 20, with the theory being that scum are nervous about sheeping wagons and thus will run their mouth a bit when switching.
In post 446, lufan131 wrote:In post 443, Katsuki wrote:Everyone's starting to realize (skimmed, and already saw points by Equinox, sakura and farside) how scummy AA's play is yet we still can't seem to get a wagon going...
IKR... They've all said how much they dislike how they play, yet still won't do anything about it.
In post 526, lalaladucks wrote:Can I just get an indication of who actually agrees with the No Lynch plan?
I know Gaiden wants to NL.
I know I don't want to, Muffin doesn't want to.
Other people: Gaiden's NL plan - yay or nay?
In post 540, zMuffinMan wrote:
In post 200, RedCoyote wrote:I'm going to be honest, I won't vote for someone I don't think is scum. Period.
Then you're just dumb. All that would theoretically do is hurt town because if the player was going to be lynched, he's still going to be lynched regardless of your vote and your stance is just bad for the overall sin factor.
Like. It's just dumb. Maybe in some other game it would make sense but not in this one.
In post 768, ArcAngel9 wrote:
You're sailing on two boats.. You can't do that.. Pick your side.. If you think massive wagon is a solid and what is stopping you moving your vote there? And again you also said you feel back for turbolynching lufan and yet you want him to flip... you're being very opportunist btw. I really don't feel good about this post!!!
In post 767, zMuffinMan wrote:What did you like about redcoyote's massive case?
In post 962, lufan131 wrote:In post 956, lalaladucks wrote:lufan, do you have anything to say that might make us think you actually aren't scum?
Nah. The flip will let you know that it was wrong, though. I know I'm town, and if you don't believe me, it's your choice.
In post 979, Katsuki wrote:OH SHIT THOSE WHO DIE GO UP TO HEAVEN.
OPTIMAL PLAY IS TO LYNCH ME AND IT WILL SATISFY AA'S DESIRE TO NOT HAVE TO DEAL WITH ME ANYMORE.
SO YOU GUYS SHOULD VOTE FOR ME
AND THEN NO-LYNCH EVERY DAY THEREAFTER.
GAME = WON
Now please help get me lynched I can't self-vote if I want to go up (which I am finding incredibly amusing considering how you can't go up if you commit suicide).
In post 1209, farside22 wrote:In post 1206, Elbirn wrote:Hey Farside, who are you reading as scum? Aside from me.
ABr and massive currently are my strongest scum reads.
In post 1123, farside22 wrote:This quick wagon on AA is disturbing.
I'm staying off with my number 1 scum read aboard.
In post 1227, lalaladucks wrote:The way I saw lufan's gg post, he thought he'd been lynched, so gave us a sad crying smiley and said 'gg everyone' like we'd caught him, guilty scum. This post just looks scummy af to me.
In post 1243, farside22 wrote:In post 1216, Elbirn wrote:In post 1209, farside22 wrote:In post 1206, Elbirn wrote:Hey Farside, who are you reading as scum? Aside from me.
ABr and massive currently are my strongest scum reads.
Interesting. So what happened to your AA9 scumread from Day 1?
You forget I unvoted with kats attack on her.
I was considering that kats actions where making her emotional at the time.
In post 1218, Elbirn wrote:In post 1123, farside22 wrote:This quick wagon on AA is disturbing.
I'm staying off with my number 1 scum read aboard.
I mean, I could get it if you'd say you changed your mind after her whole outrage selfvoty drunk nonsense, but this was from before and seems a little off. You had several posts D1 where you pushed AA9, even overmefor a span of time. Last thing I could find you say on her D1 indicated a scumread, and then this post happens today and it's "lel Elbirn's on that wagon, dats a bad wagon".
If I started a wagon on Massive, would that scumread disappear too?
You seem to "forget" I voted you then.
You want to buss your buddy, let me know, I'll be happy to help.
In post 1249, Equinox wrote:
In post 1185, Elbirn wrote:So I take it I'm the only one who doesn't buy that emotional outburst?
Why? I'm aware that your opinion changed as of post 1225, but I want to know what your thinking was when you posted this.
In post 1264, farside22 wrote:Elb: When did you switch from your death lynch of Lulu to voting for AA?
In post 1283, farside22 wrote:Elb: I'm going to ask again.
What happened with your lulu scum read.
The only thing I found about AA was this.
In post 853, Elbirn wrote:AA9 might actually be scum but at this point I want her partner (Lufan) dead more than I want her dead.
OH, who's ready for irrelevant nonsense that no one will agree with?
So that whole back and forth between Katsuki and Albert? I was thinking about it, and if scum has daychat, then if those two were scum, why wouldn't they have boring irrelevant discussion in their pt? Ipso Facto, at most one of them are scum, but not both. *Drops mic*
Prior to this you were town reading her, what changed and why?
In post 1364, farside22 wrote:I love that no one said anything about my case or thoughts thus far. :roll eyes:
I'm just going to sit here with my thumb up my ass and sheep people since no one gives two shits thus far.
In post 1293, Sakura Hana wrote:In post 1290, Elbirn wrote:So I'ma do this, because reading Lala's ISO, posts 1223 through 1241 is just awful. Sounds like nervous scum to me, and then at the first sight of pressure she ducks out.
Well the 2nd is just her stating that she's going to be V/LA, and the former seemed to me like she was going on about what RC seemed to imply about him being the only person townreading her, the nervous scum and ducking out come in other posts, so im not sure if you mislinked or smth, your vote is in the right place tho.
In post 1290, Elbirn wrote:Also, ima sheep the shit outta Sakura's 1273 and 1286.
When did your read on me change enough to sheep my reasoning?
In post 1411, RedCoyote wrote:I want to heap a bunch of praise on AA9 because I'm impressed with her last few posts. A lot of what she's been saying is taking the words out of my mouth.
ABR, I will take the time to read your case more thoroughly. Please understand that I'm really put off with this game because I do not understand why lufan is being given a pass by a number of players. I think he's only gotten worse over time. I could understand if he had picked it up and started really getting aggressive and helping the town, but he's completely on auto-pilot just saying the things he thinks other players want to hear. That said, I appreciate you wanting to do your own thing and start up your own wagon on a player you feel strongly about (farside). I just hate that I'm expected to cast aside the effort I've put into this game and sheep others when I don't think the lufan situation was properly resolved. If my reads had been proven wrong, I'd be more than willing to concede to others... but nothing has come of what damn well should've happened D1.
In post 1450, grapes wrote:In post 1432, Elbirn wrote:Here's the thing, I don't want to lynch Lufan because, while he's been not exactly reassuring today, I'm trusting our Angel to vig him tonight due to how much of a headache he obviously is. I'm not confident in him flipping scum. I am fairly confident in him being confused newbtown. Either way, angel kills him tonight, saves us the trouble of a potential mislynch, and if he's town he gets to be masons with Muffin, Tere, and Angel, which would probably be a good way to teach him how not to be confused if they're so inclined to mentor him. That's a win all around for everybody.
1)Yuck
2)Why are trying to direct vig shots
3)Especially if you're 'fairly confident' that lufans' town?
4)Where's all this 'masons with the angel' stuff stemming from?
This doesn't even make sense.
Why should the Angel waste a vig kill on someone you don't even think is scum. Nonsense.
In post 1477, SXTLHGaiden wrote:that's 4 people not town there
seems like you caught all the scum
also, is there any particular order you placed those in?
In post 1476, ArcAngel9 wrote:elbir - who in your not town you would like to lynch today?
In post 1500, SXTLHGaiden wrote:
but it is clear that you copied the list of live players then put them in each list top to bottom EXCEPT ABR
In post 1512, SXTLHGaiden wrote:
no, right no it's that you are scum and used list to make your "is town" lists
In post 1647, RedCoyote wrote:Wow.
So I guess Kat completely pulled the strings on that one... even from beyond the grave. You know, I dislike Kat's play this game, but the onus of that shot really falls on the angel for not standing up to Kat. I laid out the rationale for AA9 town about as clearly as I could possibly have done. I do not understand that shot at all, and I'm very disheartened with it. I'm guessing it's just someone that either hasn't been paying much attention to the game or let themselves completely be controlled by Kat. The same Kat that has been voting AA9 since page 1, post 17.
I'm guessing it's someone that read Kat as town and AA9 as scum... but, wow. I'm really shellshocked how anyone was still taking Kat seriously this far along into the game. I'm not going to vote until we get a claim. I think I know who is might be, but I was thinking he would've been better able to ignore Kat's nonsense. Well, I guess I'll just come right out and call it as Gaiden because I want the credit for calling it before he claims.
In post 1687, Elbirn wrote:In post 1647, RedCoyote wrote:Wow.
So I guess Kat completely pulled the strings on that one... even from beyond the grave. You know, I dislike Kat's play this game, but the onus of that shot really falls on the angel for not standing up to Kat. I laid out the rationale for AA9 town about as clearly as I could possibly have done. I do not understand that shot at all, and I'm very disheartened with it. I'm guessing it's just someone that either hasn't been paying much attention to the game or let themselves completely be controlled by Kat. The same Kat that has been voting AA9 since page 1, post 17.
I'm guessing it's someone that read Kat as town and AA9 as scum... but, wow. I'm really shellshocked how anyone was still taking Kat seriously this far along into the game. I'm not going to vote until we get a claim. I think I know who is might be, but I was thinking he would've been better able to ignore Kat's nonsense. Well, I guess I'll just come right out and call it as Gaiden because I want the credit for calling it before he claims.
So Red, how is it that you know the Angel killed AA9?
VOTE: RedCoyote
In post 1698, Glass wrote:UNVOTE:
I've decided that I want the angel to claim. If RC actually scumslipped, then the scum did target the angel last night and so the scum already know who the angel is. I would like the confirmation that the angel did indeed shoot AA before lynching him.
In post 1735, Sakura Hana wrote:Also I'm starting to grow suspicious of everyone going "If the angel claims they shot AA9 then sure we will lynch RC" sounds like scum planning to sacrifice RC for the sake of figuring out who the Angel is...
In post 1750, lalaladucks wrote:
Care to contribute any readslist of your own rather than calling my one nullread disgusting?
No?
How about you keep your comments to yourself then.
In post 1756, lalaladucks wrote:In post 1752, Elbirn wrote:In post 1750, lalaladucks wrote:
Care to contribute any readslist of your own rather than calling my one nullread disgusting?
No?
How about you keep your comments to yourself then.
Oh wow, that. That overdefensive reaction to me pointing out how gross it was for you to put one of your partners in your null reads.
Also, what is 1475. Oh, yes, my reads list. How'd that get there.
VOTE: Lalaladucks
Oh, I didn't realise that your reads wouldn't change at all in 300 posts.
Thanks for the vote, looks nice on my resume!
In post 1781, Sakura Hana wrote:Ok you know what, all this "But Sakura what if..." "But Sakura what if..." "BUT SAKURA, WHAT IF!"
I'm just going to save you the trouble of speculating and claim Angel and claim that i shot AA9 (as well as Tere).
There you have it.
I already explained why I shot Tere on D2. As for why I shot AA9, well you're correct that it was half influenced by a certain cupcake, I still also had my doubts on the slot and I figured that after all the self-hammer gambit that happened D2, there was no way she'd ever get lynched, so I decided to shoot there.
The reason i thought of no kill gambit is, why in the blue fuck would scum try to shoot me...
In post 1805, Sakura Hana wrote:Anyway all 3 of them also want RC dead. And the bird with grinning teeth usually has very good reads past D1, i'd sheep that any day.
Also sorry Marquis, my reads have been all over the place this game, which also helped influence that shot.
I'd also like to apologize to AA9 for shooting her.
In post 1806, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Meurgh I had the angel as Equinox.