Borderlands Mafia [GAME OVER]
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
In summary:
Dwlee's tongue emoji use was weird.
TSO has only been here 2 years and 364 days. I joined three days before him.
Suzune is being really awkward and taking that tell seriously pings my scumdar.
VOTE: Suzune
The first two words in Titus' posts began with g and f. Godfather. When she flips GF I take credit for it.
grapes is Suzune's buddy.
P-edit: and dwlee is #3-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
In post 98, Dwlee99 wrote:Elyse this is not the time to tunnel titus and then reveal as an innocent child. :3
What if Titus is scum??????????????????????????????
P-edit: oh my god-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
In post 104, Dwlee99 wrote:If you are talking about my then mine is correct.
No I was talking to SirCakez
In post 105, Dwlee99 wrote:Elyse what is your problem. Do you actually think I am scum or are you trolling me
Now I do-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
In post 120, SirCakez wrote:Dwlee is super awkward, especially 105 and 113, but I'm not sure if it's his playstyle or legitimate scumminess.
The GF crumb stuff needs to go away though, that would be absurd.
He was more confident last time I played with him by a lot.-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
In post 129, Dwlee99 wrote:I am not confident this early unless something pings me hard. And last time I tunelled town for two days and they were a power role. Maybe sleepy posting comes across as scummy, that might be it. But I am pretty sure i got wagoned in denmark mafia d1 elyse. Just like this.
I don't remember that. Could be true.
But I remember you being assertive in saying you were town and almost like people were stupid for even considering you were scum for a second. It's a stark contrast from "I think I'm mislynch bait".-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
In post 136, Dwlee99 wrote:I decided to stop declaring myself town because people scum read me for it. god damnit elyse.
Am I supposed to know this???
In post 141, Dwlee99 wrote:Being "obvscum"as town is fun because yoi get all the people voting for you feeling like total idiots when ya flip
Who called you obvscum? This is so premature.-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
In post 411, Dwlee99 wrote:RIP 30 minutes of my life.
YT is a good vote.
If you flip town I will crusade for YT's lynch.-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
In post 425, Dwlee99 wrote:Yo elyse what do you think of my reads that aren't yt?
pedit: Lol aafter you scum?
The ones in 408? They're good except I don't have Rob or wguerts as town.
In post 453, Almost50 wrote:1st (@SirCakez): NO. I did NOT read between Ranger's where she said posted a "needs to post" on top of 2 dices and where I said she meant we should not hammer. The post(s) where you refer to a player who is not in game I did NOT read.
The thing is whenever I try to post there's always some new posts, and if I read them first then some more will be posted, and so on. So, I just read up to some point and start typing and when I submit I do not read the new posts.. I just confirm my post to be submitted anyway. (This is a temporary situation and should not last long).
2nd: I have decided Dwlee to be 3rd party but NOT a member of the main mafia group. There's NO WAY 12 or even 10 townies will agree on a lynch in the opening 24-48 hours. So it follows that 3-4 mafia are on that wagon, if not even all of them. TSO voted him then Titus (who is town to me) joined in and everybody started piling up line ants on sugar. He did make a slip (Dwlee; that is) that I can't see as an "innocent" one, but still doesn't justify the pile up on him like there was a "be won Dwlee's wagon" kind of win-con in their role PMs.
So, not town (bc he did tell a lie) and not mafia (bc they're voting him) = self-aligned 3rd party. Remains to be seen whether he is likely harmful, bc .. YES .. I have seen town-aligned 3rd party players (ex: Survivour Doctor). They may turn against the time in later stages of the game if needs be, but at the start of the game chances are they want the town to win fast so they can also win.
Whenever someone suggest a third party so early on, it makes me think they're scum who genuinely thinks someone else is scum, but knows they aren't groupscum.
SirCakez's over the top reaction to Varsoon's fake hammer is noted.
In post 477, BRantz wrote:Well I can safely say this is the fastest day 1 I have ever had in a large game...
For someone who hasn't really posted anything of substance (that I remember at least), it's interesting you post this as what could be your last post of day 1.
In post 503, BRantz wrote:I went from... wait, did that just happen, to it's varsoon, this is probably a play of some kind, to Beeboy what are you doing?! Beeboy STAHP!
Again, what's the point of this?
In post 517, BRantz wrote:This has been fun 10/10, would do again.
Or this
In post 541, BRantz wrote:Jesus, if YT just keeps spouting theory at us I am going to want to policy lynch him.
Why policy? Why don't you take a stance and say, "YT is scummy for spouting theory and not scumhunting"? It reads to me as almost coaching.
Scumread on BRantz.
In post 561, YT2980 wrote:Don't y'all fret. I promise to make up ground next day phase which is hopefully longer.
Wtf is this
In post 573, Almost50 wrote:In post 510, CooLDoG wrote:why wouldn't multi-ball be more likely?
The question is "why would it?" Have we seen anything that indicates a MB game? Did your role PM mention something about it?
Assuming multi-ball w/o a valid reason only complicates matters further for me. I will assume MB when I see something that points to MB. For now I'm comfortable thinking this would be a straightforward entertaining game, so please just let me enjoy my dream while it lasts.
P.S. Are you suggesting this IS a multi-ball?
This pointless speculation is making me scumread Almost.
In post 582, SirCakez wrote:If someone legitimately hammers then it's basically a scum claim.
Now that the cat's out of the bag, I can say I really hate how YT used the hammer as an excuse to not post any reads or do any scumhunting.
Mhm @ the second part
In post 605, SirCakez wrote:Elyse needs to be doing more. Don't like how she just popped in, dropped a troll vote and left.
Lol
Maybe I like have a life. Ever consider that? My world doesn't revolve around MS.
In post 615, Rob14 wrote:I just don't believe that you went from completely familiar with a dayvig gambit in a past game to completely ignorant of what they are, like you claimed, two months later. It's not just the fact that it happened once and you forgot. It's that you talked about it multiple times, discussed it as if you werealready familiar with it, and then were unable to recall when asked specifically if you've ever seen it before. Surely, the memories would come back after you realized this one was a gambit? If not, when someone asked you directly about past games?
The chances of you telling the truth are way too remote not to lynch you. It's not conf biasing. I actually would have a town read on you if not for that one thing, probably. It's just that T S O pushed your shit in pretty hard.
This explains exactly why I want to lynch Dwlee. Like we can't keep him alive long anyway with the doubt surrounding his slot.
In post 646, YT2980 wrote:Early in the analysis, I'm on the fence about Elyse. She's particularly forceful with her assertions. She seems eager to pass people off as scum, suggesting she's eager to lynch scum. On the flipside, this could be a ploy on her behalf designed to make us believe she is town in that she's actively scum hunting.. I will look into her more if DWLee is lynched and flips town.
How does that fence feel up your butthole???
In post 649, SirCakez wrote:Peregrine is usually a lurksack as scum, as seen in MGSV and YCBA IV. The fact he's active and pushing people here makes me pretty confident he's town
Yeah. I feel like I can read Peregrine pretty well and I think he's town here.
In post 651, Venmar wrote:In post 649, SirCakez wrote:Peregrine is usually a lurksack as scum, as seen in MGSV and YCBA IV.
Actually Peregrine just lurks most of the time. I wouldn't call him super active here either.
There's a difference between his scum and town lurking though. His town lurking actually has meaningful content. As scum, he pretends to not know what's going on or randomly votes the top wagon.
In post 672, popsofctown wrote:Ok. So I decided I'm just gonna netdeck. Which generated enough time for me to read and catch up on this thread.
I feel like TSO's slip catch thing is legit. Legit enough. 100% foolproof, no, well beyond significant enough to justify a lynch in the game of mafia where most things are far less concrete.
My bad penny post might be the most quoted post in the thread now, with unanimous agreement that it is scummy. I'm glad to at least have generated discussion. It was really just a stream of consciousness post that went both ways because I genuinely had feelings both ways on it, and I generally don't triple down on the preview button and distill my posts into one streamlined position when I play town, I try to be glassy.
Using theory to avoid posting content can be a scumtell, but if you look at the way YT has been doing so it hasn't been a very damning style. - points to those leaning on keyword tells instead of intuition.
I'm good to lynch this whenever.
beeboy is whiteknighting Dwlee so hard.
Stopping at the end of page 30 for now. I have to go. Varsoon is town for his post on page 30.-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
Ok starting at the top of pg 31
In post 777, Rob14 wrote:Since beeboy isn't proposing a better target, allow me.
VOTE: beeboy
His derail is ignoring all new information. It's clear he didn't understand the wagon fully (either willfully or unintentionally) when he started decrying it, but rather than react to new information that directly contradicts his narrative of why Dwlee would not have remembered things, he's desperately trying to plug the holes each bout of explanation creates. In his last post, he literally said that he had no idea how dwlee could have forgotten, and yet he still must have. This isn't someone forming reads to the available info. It's someone fitting the info to the read that's convenient.
Ironically, he's making me rethink Dwlee, but only because his white-knighting is so atrocious here. More likely that it's multiball and he thinks Dwlee is town.
Agree with this, except why is it more likely that it's multiball?
Moreover, in 795, you say the Dwlee might be town. Even if it is multiball and beeboy is scum, why would you trust him to read Dwlee as town?
All this arguing between Rob and beeboy is pointless. Beeboy doesn't think Dwlee is scum and Rob does. There's really nothing else to be said. You're not going to convince the other that you're right. Rob is right though and I don't understand why beeboy is being so insistent on Dwlee town since even if he did tell the truth, that doesn't make him town.
In post 887, beeboy wrote:Oh I get it now, also I have come to the realization you where scum after reading Rob's explanation on how memory works and your explanation on your memory loss.
VOTE: Dwlee99
lol
In post 905, Rob14 wrote:I don't really have a good read on pops. The fence-sitting accusation definitely isn't wrong, but I also kind of feel like it's one of those low-effort "easy" reads that generally result in mislynches. Pops' willingness to stand up to the bad Dwlee wagon (the one pre-TSO's discovering the lie) was a + from me, but at the same time, yeah, he did kind of not commit fully in that direction. So idk. Everything from him since that early thing that I talked about in my stream of consciousness is pretty null. Like I just don't remember any of it.
pops + Rob team
In post 956, Dwlee99 wrote:To anyone who thinks that I am scum because I didnt remember the fake dayvig:
What is your read on me outside of that?
Why are you confbiasing so hard?
1. scum
2. loaded question
awful
In post 968, T S O wrote:Repeating that you forgot isn't going to get you anywhere, Dwlee. That argument has been thoroughly debunked. Equally, attempting to tell us that you forget where items are in your kitchen won't garner you any support.
I'm liking grapes a lot this game. Much different than last time.
In post 999, T S O wrote:Well, thanks for putting yourself at L-3, Dwlee. It means a lot.
See that's the issue with TSO. He's so fun to play with that I don't want to scumread him and put blinders on. Hopefully Dwlee's scumflip will allow me to put him firmly in the townpile.
In post 1013, Dwlee99 wrote:Once I die I am going to multiquote every time someone said I was aid I mist definitely wasnt town like you just did, rob. I am them putting them all in google docs and once the game ends I am postjg a huge wall of that.
The fact that you continue to argue that everyone is stupid for thinking you're scum makes me think you're even scummier. Like how don't you understand why you're being lynched and that it's valid? You are continuing to wail and be unhelpful instead of finding scum.
Titus' reads seem whack. Sucks that she can't elaborate on them.
In post 1080, Dwlee99 wrote:I think it's multiball because everyone on my wagon actually thinks I am scum. This means that both scum teams think I'm on the other.
How can you tell this?
The resistance to the Dwlee wagon makes me feel better. This slot needs to die. It will help me sure up my reads on TSO, beeboy, SirCakez, Peregrine, and pisskop.
In post 1145, grapes wrote:In post 990, Titus wrote:snip
My first thought when I saw your reads was questioning if we were reading the same game or not. lol
Not sure if that means anything yet.
Phrases like "not sure if that means anything yet" always ping me.
YT's posts are getting better. My #588 was a troll vote. I was already voting Dwlee and fake hammered him as a joke because a bunch of other people did. I was briefly checking in and read the latest few pages at that point. I do question why he moved me from unsure to his third or fourth biggest scumread when I hadn't posted in between.
In post 1208, CooLDoG wrote:tl;dr, CooLDoG has this random scum tell he has been working on, Nero fit into that mold, thus CooLDoG believes Nero is scummy.
Out of interest though, I would like nero to respond to the line after the quote above.
Seems legit. Do you actually think you can get a Nero wagon going based on that though?
In post 1228, YT2980 wrote:If there's a cop in the set-up, I would consider targeting him during the night phase, honestly. I wouldn't mind myself getting targeted either so I'm confirmed town.
Yikes.
In post 1233, grapes wrote:YT, almost50 and someone else that I'm forgetting have been like, blatantly SK hunting and the best part is that they're new enough to not realize how universal that scumtell is.
Yeah you're right. YT's "I wouldn't mind getting cop-checked" reads to me as a third party with investigation immunity.
In post 1254, YT2980 wrote:Just saw that you grapes, and suzune are masons. So that means suzune and grapes are pretty much confirmed town, right? I'll have to research the role to get the gist of it. Also like the case you brought up against aafter, the post you referred to is a lot of whitewash dressed up in a long post. I'm game when it comes to voting him, though I'm still putting pisskop on priority for now. Call him my #2 for now. We need more out of him.
This is something else that pings me. Why would you bring this up???
In post 1272, Almost50 wrote:Everybody else is null for me.
Dwlee is null for you?
Edit: nvm, answered later
In post 1276, Dwlee99 wrote:I think that people should know I'm town based on the fact that literally everyone wants to lynch me but apparently not.
If I was your scumbuddy I would have bussed you so hard the minute TSO exposed you. But there are a bunch of (misguided) people who don't want to lynch you. I mean, you're still alive.
VOTE: Dwlee99
P-edit: What does "would almost want to look at" mean????-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
In post 1290, Dwlee99 wrote:wait
You find me calling everyone stupid scummy? You said that I was scum earlier for NOT doing that. .-.
The difference is that in the last game you said this when people mentioned you as scumread. Now you are doing it when you are the inevitable lynch of the day. It's a lazy way to not be productive instead of the confidence you showed last time.
YT2980 wrote:DWLee, updated read on Elyse? Do you still think she is conclusively town?
Why did you change me from null to scum when I didn't post in between?
P-edit:
This should be good.-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
In post 1297, Elyse wrote:The difference is that in the last game you said this when people mentioned you as scumread. Now you are doing it when you are the inevitable lynch of the day. It's a lazy way to not be productive instead of the confidence you showed last time.-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
In post 1303, YT2980 wrote:When did I say you were scum? Point it out. Are you referring to my ordering of people on that one post? I think I had you as fifth most likely to flip scum. I just hadn't gotten a town vibe out of your posts.
Yes that's what I was referring to. I assumed that having me at the bottom of such a long list meant you thought I was scum.
Dwlee99 wrote:In post 1297, Elyse wrote:The difference is that in the last game you said this when people mentioned you as scumread. Now you are doing it when you are the inevitable lynch of the day. It's a lazy way to not be productive instead of the confidence you showed last time.
People are mentioning me as a scumread right now. I am not the guaranteed lynch today. You're just making up bs reasons to scumread me.
People are VOTING you now, not mentioning you. And yes you are the guaranteed lynch today. How can you not see that-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
In post 1321, SirCakez wrote:Everything in your catchup posts related to Rob is agreeing with him though. Did the scumread dissipate?
No.
I could see that though since I agreed with a lot of his thoughts re Dwlee. Maybe it just doesn't show in my catchup. I thought he said a couple wonky things, I think one was about multiball and saying that Dwlee might be town because it could be multiball and beeboy could be scum.-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
In post 1322, Dwlee99 wrote:Promise me you're killing elyse.
I'm reaching out to you.
Do I need to explain myself again?-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
In post 1325, Dwlee99 wrote:Why the fuck are you reaching out to me if you think I'm scum?
I'm trying to get you to understand why you're wrong.
In post 1326, Dwlee99 wrote:Do you know I'm flipping town and you're eating rope tomorrow? Are you scared?
I'm shaking in my boots.-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
In post 1539, Venmar wrote:motherfuckers killed my only townreads like motherfucking why
vote: popsofctown
Bit of an overreaction but I'll join you here.
VOTE: popsofctown-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
In post 1624, YT2980 wrote:In post 1623, Elyse wrote:Does anyone have experience with beeboy? He doesn't seem like a ballsy scum player who would put himself out there like he did.
Well, I know he was scum in the last game I played:
Here if you want to view: http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=83&t=65087
This game seems like an utter contrast.
I think 23 posts is hard to judge. I don't want to run up beeboy right now.
In post 1626, Almost50 wrote:In post 1590, grapes wrote:I kinda wanna wagon 50.
Oh, I'm so sorry I've hurt your delicate feelings by stating you weren't on top of my schedule. I promise to give you proper attention when I'm less occupied trying to get obv!scum lynched. You see, when I see scum I tend to try to lynch them rather than keep it to myself and try to engage with someone else who could potentially mess up with my mind. Your case though will become more apparent towards the middle of the day, so I will -by then- decide on whether you're still a suspect worth inspecting or have actually lift up yourself towards the more secure slots. Until then, feel free to do whatever makes you happy. BEST OF LUCK.
Yeah this is awful.-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
In post 1676, SirCakez wrote:Elyse put the Pops wagon on the backburner and vote one of the active wagons please.
No. More people need to check in. I don't want to abandon pops yet.-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
In post 1734, pisskop wrote:As long as were clear youre still pushing it as a mechanical guilty.
You mean this pisskop? What does this mean?
@Almost
What do you think about Rob's guilty?-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
In post 1777, pisskop wrote:It means Ima let others do their thing and observe.
I'm asking you what your thoughts on the guilty are.-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
In post 1783, pisskop wrote:I disapprove on outing it so early, I dislike that they are explicitly claiming 'not cop', and I dont like how they are hedging their bets.
That said Im always open to lynching based on claimed guilties. Those are usually wins. But multiballs. They complicate things like that.
I dont think I could make it any clearer that I havent read 90% of the game, so I have no explicit opinion on the D1 play of either. I dont like TSO and AI pings me in a way he has failed to in the handful of other games Ive seen him in.
Cool. I agree with this.-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
In post 1790, Almost50 wrote:In post 1750, Elyse wrote:Why are you ignoring Rob?
I'm not and wasn't. I'm just a slow reader and even more so a typist, and I'm still a page behind as of now. I will finish catching up & sign off, but I have by now voted Mimi.
OK-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
In post 1792, Almost50 wrote:
Elyse, I did vote her when I got to that part. You can see where I'm at by the quotes I respond to. If I'm responding to post #1000 (say) it means I've only read to that one, and have yet to read post #1001
I said ok.
I was serious.
pisskop wrote:
I ever mention elly was nommed for a scummy in one of my games w/her? for best scum? she put in more effort than most town, and her cases were built out of mediocre discussion.
Are you trying to scumread me for putting in effort?-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
In post 1796, pisskop wrote:In post 1794, Elyse wrote:Are you trying to scumread me for putting in effort?
Im trying to scumread you for asking questions and then agreeing with every answer.
1) where have I done this besides your assessment of the guilty
2) why is that scummy
3) what does that have to do with my past scumgame-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
Bear with me and the length of this post as I try to catch up on 50+ pages.
In post 1873, Nero Cain wrote:Part of me is like mimi's claim is so bizarre that it couldn't be fake but the other part says "Would that really be here?" and I think not so consider my vote on Mimi is spirit. Still don't trust Rob though.
Why is this all you have to say?
In post 1889, beeboy wrote:In post 1887, Nicole Mimi Tithel wrote:I would like anyone who doesn't buy the guilty result on me to explain why the hell scum-Rob would claim a guilty on me, when all it'd do is probably get him lynched the next day. And ya it could have been a legit guilty even if he is scum here, but if he was scum, with an info role and got a guilty, why would he openly post it and basically tell the other scum team to shoot him?
To be honest I can't grasp the situation at all which is why I am aborting.
This is scummy. There's nothing to grasp.
In post 1908, Venmar wrote:Rob went so balls to the wall to tryign to allure his role without claiming that I think he should just claim at this point because if he's town he's fucking dead anyways.
I get being suspicious of the guilty, but I don't see why Rob would do what he did as scum.
In post 1911, PeregrineV wrote:In post 1694, Rob14 wrote:So I just remembered to actually check my PMs and read what my night action result was.
Nicole Mimi, claim now. If not, you're getting quick-lynched. I have an incriminating result, but I'm not going to say what type so that the counter-claim cannot be tailored. I want a full claim - name, role, and who you targeted last night, including result of said action.
In post 1887, Nicole Mimi Tithel wrote:I would like anyone whodoesn'tbuy the guilty result on me to explain why the hell scum-Rob would claim a guilty on me, when all it'd do is probably get him lynched the next day. And ya it could have been a legit guilty even if he is scum here, but if he was scum, with an info role and got a guilty, why would he openly post it and basically tell the other scum team to shoot him?
If you read his claim, it directly contradicts yours. If you are telling the truth, how do you think HE is telling the truth?
Adding Peregrine to the firm town pile.
In post 1922, Rob14 wrote:I didn't even check my PMs until the moment I made that post, you dolt. I didn't forget a guilty.
The day started while I was working on some stuff due this morning, and I just saw the thread open. I haven't been getting emails when I get PMs lately for some reason.
I frequently miss getting PMs, so this is understandable. I also think that if Rob were to fake a guilty, he would have planned it at night and come out with it as soon as the day started. Unless he did it on the fly, which is highly unlikely and risky, him not checking PMs seems legit.
In post 1927, beeboy wrote:In post 1922, Rob14 wrote:I didn't even check my PMs until the moment I made that post, you dolt. I didn't forget a guilty.
The day started while I was working on some stuff due this morning, and I just saw the thread open. I haven't been getting emails when I get PMs lately for some reason.
So you used an investigative action and didn't think of it. You also saw at least 2 new messages in your inbox and decided to not read them. Ya this is way too fishy to be legit.
VOTE: Rob
Liking beeboy more for scum.
In post 1932, T S O wrote:If you think Rob is scum who has decided to Guilty Nicole then you should still be voting Nicole.
This. Venmar and co's reluctance in believing the guilty and going as far to vote Rob is really scummy.
In post 1935, beeboy wrote:I think Rob is a scum investigator who was being honest about the claim (or simply lying scum). In multi ball right now Rob being a scum investigator makes sense. Also as town if you are investigating people you actually care about I doubt you wouldn't check your pms to see what the result was but as scum it is reasonable to assume that the result isn't important to you which is why you didn't bother to check it.
If my theory is true determining whether rob is investigative scum or just lying scum we can just watch him flip and if he flips an investigative role we can confirm that Nicole is also scum.
OR we lynch Nicole and if she flips town, we lynch Rob and if she flips scum, he should be NK'd anyway. And if he's not then we can deal with that later. Losing an investigative for no reason like you're suggesting is mindboggling. I don't see how that comes from a town mindset.
In post 1947, beeboy wrote:In post 1941, Rob14 wrote:I saw ZERO FUCKING THIGNS UIN MY INBOX.
I DON'T GET EMAILS WHEN I GET PMs. I DIDN'T KNOW ANYTHING WAS THERE.
I clicked a bookmark to come to the thread while I was procrastinating on an assignment I was in the middle of working on and checking up on my mod commitments. I noticed the thread was open and started reading . THIS IS NOT HARD TO UNDERSTAND
You are a scum investigator if you are an investigator at all. Town would want to check there pms if they actually cared about the results of the night action but to a scum investigator those results aren't that relevant until the night phase.
This is complete bullshit.
In post 1978, pisskop wrote:In post 1968, YT2980 wrote:I'm convinced pisskop and starbucks are scum partners.
I think its customary for new players to play in newbie games first before omgusing people to death
Oh look, pisskop is continuing to comment on random shit and not scumhunt!
In post 1984, SirCakez wrote:Beeboy is waffling more then actual waffles. Second time now he's heavily whiteknighted someone then turned around and voted them.
Mhm.
In post 2046, grapes wrote:In post 2043, Nicole Mimi Tithel wrote:Some people even as scum in multiball will play it as if they were single-faction scum (i.e. playing for survival). Could easily enough see Aafter going for this approach.
Gonna go with occams razor for now and say he probably just doesn't have that good a scumgame.
Flavor point doesn't really do it for me either.
I wouldn't rule out multiball based on this. Aafter could just be a shitty scumhunter.
In post 2056, Suzune wrote:In the earlier part of the game, I thought she was townieish. She seemed like she was scum hunting. But as the game has gone on she has lost some of that strength and I began to question whether she just happened to fall into a good spot early on. I'm kind of scum leaning on Elyse. She is taking the quite way out. She is not really talking about much and is being over defensive in the posts that she talking with other people. She asks a lot of questions but does not allow us the same insight into her because she does not share much either just agrees or lets the question hang. This really pings me.
This is mostly due to a lack of time, but sometimes when I ask questions, people give me a satisfying answer. I'm not going to pretend there's something wrong with it if there's not. As far as being defensive, I tend to respond when people mention my name and I've learned that defensiveness isn't scummy.
In post 2091, Venmar wrote:If Mimi is confirmed scum, like you said, then as far as I am concerned the reads don't matter. If Mimi is town, then she can knock herself out I guess.
Like Rob said, this is a drastic change from wanting to lynch Rob to wanting to lynch Mimi without even letting her share her reads. What's the harm in letting her post? If she's scum, we can disregard her reads. It's not like it's any effort on your part.
For the most part, I really like Mimi's reads. Obviously her read on me is wrong, and I'll address that next, but she puts a lot of thought into her reads and they generally make sense. There's just no way I don't want to lynch her from Rob's "unless this game is bastard, you have to be scum" declaration. If it weren't for that, Mimi would probably be a strong townread for me.
In post 2110, Nicole Mimi Tithel wrote:First off, I think dwlee's Elyse point he made before he got lynched was mostly solid, although there's more to it than what he said. In 134, she claimed she explicitly remembered him exuding the aura of town confidence where anyone who pushes you is dumb regardless of how good your posts are objectively. Then in 1287 she pushes him for doing the same thing. Her justification is that in the previous game it was in response to him being "scum read" while here he was the "de facto lynch", which is probably true. My issue with it is that even if this was a true statement, it isn't actually a valid justification. It's the same fucking mindset, regardless of if you're being scum read or seriously pressured, and in fact I would expect it to be the other way around: it'd be _more_ prevalent if you're under more pressure, not less. I think the justification she made was a complete afterthought, and so was her "reaching out" to him afterward, as I said before - you don't fucking reach out to someone who you think is practically confscum.
It absolutely is a valid justification as I explained. Exuding confidence when not under pressure is something I expected from townDwlee. Then when he was the de facto lynch, instead of doing what you're doing here, he whined and called everyone stupid. Instead of acting protown and giving reads or something, he just bitched about it. That's not something I expected from townDwlee. I don't understand why reaching out to a player you're scumreading is scummy, but there's really nothing to debate there.
In post 2110, Nicole Mimi Tithel wrote:I usually don't mind posts like this, but this actually is a scummy redirecting-conversation attempt. Someone getting a guilty doesn't just mean that everyone else needs to shut the fuck up and follow it immediately; there is nothing wrong with alternate conversation in the meantime as long as people acknowledge it in due time eventually. This reads more as an attempt to appear proactive and useful, without actually doing anything.
One of my favorite scumtells is when players avoid commenting on something like a guilty or a dayvig because they're unsure of how they're supposed to act. I tried to engage people into talking about the guilty on you to get them to react to it and see if it was fake or not. I was satisfied with pisskop's response, and Almost was catching up. It was not an attempt to shut down discussion at all.
In post 2144, grapes wrote:Like, almost50 needs death bad. My vote is on that over a cop guilty. Yea that bad.
Plus Nicoles CONTENT though.
Still dunno. My brain says yes and my heart says no kinda thing.
Yeah Almost's posts are awful. He's trying to feed into the "look I'm posting crazy theories!" thing but under that mask he's not doing much of anything. But then he softclaims and while I hate softclaims, I don't expect him to use that as a crutch if he's scum.
In post 2153, wgeurts wrote:Right.
I am your God now and we're doing what I say today or you commit deicide.
Any protective roles out there should be on Rob tonight. Then depending on what Rob answers to Mimi the town vig (obviously out there as there were three kills and if we have three scum kills Skull has some explaining to do) should or should not vig Mimi.
In the meanwhile we shall lynch scum; namely Pisskop.
I'm am your Lord. You are my servants. This is my will.
Gladiate: Pisskop
I sir, challenge you to a duel.
whyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
I could totally see Mimi lying about the specifics of her role/wguerts trying to get another night result from her.
In post 2178, Rob14 wrote:It's absolutely WIFOM for you to high effort it and then claim only town you would do that, since you were already planning your defense when you decided to high effort it.
This.
In post 2180, SirCakez wrote:Maxous's entrance was pretty weak. Didn't drop any reads and instead asked a pointless question that I'm sure Nicole would have answered by now. Need to see actual content from there.
Plus BRantz was a scumfuck.
Mimi's stance of "You have to lynch me but let me post content first" to "Anyone who is scumreading me sucks" is super scummy. I just think she's really freaking good and the possibility of multiball helps as well.
In post 2237, Nicole Mimi Tithel wrote:After I flip, you'll be run up and forced to fullclaim, and then if you're town I can almost guarantee that someone will figure out some bullshit reason (either an oversight or role info) which explains what happened today which, if claimed today would have just cleared this up immediately.
That's the point I'm making.
You're not getting lynched today because of the gladiate. Why not let Rob have another night of results without being outted.
In post 2242, Almost50 wrote:In post 2240, Elyse wrote:I'm sorry this week has been crazy for me. Looks like I will have to do another catchup post soon but I don't have time today either.
This is really hurting my overall read about you. I just might change my mind and visit you instead of grapes.
I don't lurk unless my real life commitments force me to. This was just one of those weeks.
Ok breaking and posting this now. Starting at the top of page 91 soon...-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
I can't get over how people are fine with wgeurts' gladiate. We have a guilty on someone and she was at L-1...that is not the time to gladiate someone. It reeks of just trying to keep Mimi alive for one more night, ESPECIALLY because he's calling for a vig on her. Like...why couldn't we have lynched her and you called for a vig on pisskop?
Most of wgeurts' 2274 is good, but the way he went about the gladiate still doesn't make sense. Posting that first and then using the gladiator out of frustration would still be stupid, but it would at least make sense.
In post 2282, Maxous wrote:In post 2201, Rob14 wrote:I'm considering just full claiming, but I'm not 100% sure.
Is your role gonna flip like Varsoon's?
If not, make sure you claim before the end of the day.
The last we want is you dying and leaving a vague guilty behind.
It bothers me that this is the only thing you decide to comment on.
In post 2297, popsofctown wrote:In post 2291, Rob14 wrote:But seriously if you protect someone with a claimed GUILTY on them, you're going down, hard.
If you copy all of your plays out of the textbook, no one will ever ask you to write one.
I like this.
pisskop's reaction to being gladiated after realizing it (finally) reads as genuine to me.
Nvm I don't like this string of posts:
In post 2344, pisskop wrote:I mean you understand he's pushingfor your death, not because of anything youve said, but because he claims to have a magic guilty he wont claim? And the only one who is apparently entertaining that his claim is faulty or was subverted is not-you.
pedit: sweet. I get to call him stupid for the rest of the day.
His case is full of shit. Lynching me is the laziest thing you guys can do.
In post 2345, pisskop wrote:Do you really want such a moron in charge and governing what lynhes will happen?
In post 2347, pisskop wrote:I mean, look at the quality of th people who jumped for it as soon as it came around
He went from all "lol someone cop wgeurts and then if he's inno ignore him" to fighting the lynch. Not that I expect him to lay down and die, but it's a drastic change.
In post 2363, pisskop wrote:Im a conditional doc. Only girls
Hmmm.
In post 2367, Rob14 wrote:Wgeurts has done this 1v1 despite a claimed guilty. That just doesn't parse. For some reason, he insists on the vig being used to kill Mimi, not the lynch. If there's a Mafia Doctor or even Jailkeeper floating around, that would explain this move. I can't think of any town motivation whatsoever to insist the claimed guilty is vigged instead of lynched.
This is key.
In post 2395, popsofctown wrote:I've seen a townie pardon obvscum. Twice in the game iirc. There's a difference in the matter-of-fact de-facto anti-town impact of an action and determining whether you think it's a plausible course of action that player might take as town (and players have egos, and can be more worried about what they're doing than what else is going on.).
Pisskop's play lately has been dramatically better. But he was so deep in scumminess that that doesn't bring him anywhere near a player with a decent post history that used an obscure town power role incorrectly.
I want to point out that lesbian power bomber is an awful claim.
1. We have a commuter, which already thwarts kills.
2. It encourages massclaim, and the goal of all good setup design is to discourage massclaims (if skullduggery has a rep for designing shitty setups or if lesbian power bomber has been a common role around here lately regardless of that obvious flaw that might mitigate that, this is my first game in at least six months if not a year)
3. Homosexual characters tend to be unnamed nameless background characters in the more recent edition of Borderlands (my knowledge is limited though, I haven't played the first one nor some of the DLC on the second. The game seemed to go out of its way to share anecdotes involving homosexuals in some tapes you pick up in the Wilderness reserve and meet its "quota" without actually introducing a major homosexual character.) (Tannis tries to get into the pants of any character you play, so she's bi) (and a paedophile since DLC added an adolescent character) (let's not get into that)
4. Doctors tend to play a little more defensive and focus on townreads, the most charitable interpretations of pisskop's play have him as a player who is not afraid to risk his neck to piss people off and try to get a scummy reaction.
5. I think he would have targetted Titus (and succeeded) as lesbian power bomber.
pisskop's claim adds little value and he definitely doesn't become the more desirable lynch target by virtue of how he's played. Giving him a pass for this power role claim is extremely lazy mafia play. And if he's going to use it to protect people like YT in what may be a multiball I'm not sure the claim even suggests he's more useful than a VT.
Vote: pisskop
This is an awful post. It's basically a list of possibilities that you decide make pisskop scum.
In post 2421, Rob14 wrote:You're right, a scum team probably doesn't have two protective roles. So more likely that we have {Mimi, pops, wguerts} and {Aafter, ???, ???} than {Mimi, pops, wguerts, Aafter} and an SK.
I don't think you're working in concert. I think you seriously misfired in talking about saying you had a jailkeep after the gladiator thing because you were worried I'd track you to protecting Mimi or something. You probably didn't get what wguerts was trying to do in setting up Mimi as the vig instead of the lynch.
Like, can you provide an alternate explanation of your claim that you want to protect a claimed guilty that actually makes sense? Because so far you've told me that you just want to be innovative or some shit, and that doesn't cut it. My explanation explains a lot more and seems way more likely than yours.
The two protective roles being gladiator and JK/Doc? In Anything Goes Mafia, there was a scum Gladiator and a JOAT which I believe had a doc shot. Not unheard of.
Did pops actually claim JK? I thought that was a joke.
In post 2429, popsofctown wrote:I have not claimed
Ok nvm.
In post 2444, Suzune wrote:I guess I will suggest it again. Why not a bus driver? In the two large games I have run, not here but elsewhere, in order to balance either two faction of mafia or a large gambit of abilities a bus driver is suggested. This would mean that even though you targeted Nicole you got another. The mod would not have lied, but you would not have had any knowledge that you move got deflected.
I'm trusting Rob on this. For example, if he was a cop that got back Mimi was scum and he was bus driven, the PM would have to say "Result: Scum" or something. It couldn't say "Nicole Mimi Tithel is scum" because that would be a direct lie.
In post 2468, popsofctown wrote:In post 2465, Rob14 wrote:In post 2434, popsofctown wrote:There were 3 kills last night. It's not hard to figure out how that resolves that discrepancy.
Why go with a maybe over aclaimed guiltythat we have a wagon about to be completed on? It makes zero sense.
From his PoV he seems 95% sure pisskop is scum and 95% sure he'll win the gladiation. There's a decent chance he could get NK'ed before getting to use his gladiation on what seems to him to be obvscum. He think Mimi is scum but she will die either way, but bringing his hard read on pisskop to fruition requires him to use his gladiation, while still alive.
It makessenseto me althought it's probably awful play.
Why would there be a decent chance wgeurts could be NK'd?
In post 2475, SirCakez wrote:Pops + wgeurts + Nicole is making more and more sense. The gladiation timing, the defense of wgeurts by Pops, the guilty on Nicole, the scumminess of Pops not being addressed by Nicole.
Like look at Nicole's read on Pops
In post 2108, Nicole Mimi Tithel wrote:
POPSOFCTOWN: I'm thoroughly meh on him. His push today re: Rob being a lyncher seems very not-what I'd expect of scum, and makes sense to me coming from town, and I've agreed with most of his positions (i.e. thinking TSO's slip was "valid enough" on D1 and his Elyse read today). None of it seems particularly unfakeable, though.
This is super generic reasoning to null read someone.
I agree with this, and I hate associative tells before flips.
In post 2482, grapes wrote:But if it is actually multiball, though. YT and Mimi are scum on opposite teams confirmed.
Why?
In post 2498, Nicole Mimi Tithel wrote:In post 2493, Rob14 wrote:But if you flip scum or don't flip at all, no, I'm not going to agree to full claim tomorrow, because I can continue using my ability in an attempt to find scum. Outing would only give more information for scum to tailor their fake claims. There's no point in giving that info out with no reason.
In reality, "not fullclaiming" is nowhere near as positive-utility as you seem to think it is. You severely overvalue keeping your role "secret", because "it can catch scum". In this situation, it absolutely is positive-utility to lay this info out sooner as opposed to later (and in this case it's not like I'm even telling you fullclaim right now, given the wgeurts-gladiate which would allow you one more result if you don't get NK'ed).
Do you actually expect to live any substantial amount in this game given you've made it completely obvious you're an investigative role. Kind of relevant but somewhat-unrelated question.
No, just no. Stop trying to get Rob to claim. Also, you doing all this shit under the guise of "I'm trying to prevent chain mislynches" is bullshit. No one is powerlynching Rob if you flip town. It's not as black and white as you're trying to make it out to be.
In post 2509, beeboy wrote:In post 2507, YT2980 wrote:Why are you so bent on him role-claiming?
We know he is a form of cop what do we lose by knowing what kind of cop? He said the one of the reasons was because it would discredit his guilty which is incredibly suspicious.
This is also awful. We lose a lot. What if he says, "I have a guilty on PerV" and PerV goes "I'm a miller" and he goes "lol I tracked you visiting the person who died last night." You aren't thinking things through like a townie should.
In post 2523, T S O wrote:Is there anyone who is voting wguerts for pisskop's claim? There shouldn't be. He's obviously lying and I don't understand why I'm the only one pointing this out.
Why is he obviously lying? I mean the lesbian power bomber flavor is obviously a joke, but a doc that only protects female characters doesn't seem crazy to me.
I do agree the YT placeholder protect is weird af and definitely deserves scrutiny, but I don't see scumpisskop attacking other players when his only shot at surviving is going balls to the wall against wgeurts.
In post 2593, Nicole Mimi Tithel wrote:In post 2590, T S O wrote:Rob - can you explain what scum-wguerts who is partners with Nicole was thinking? I don't see how his thought process comes from scum.
TSO pointing out the conclusion which obviously makes the most sense.
Which no one else so much as thought of because they're death-tunneling hard enough to think wgeurts would do something so blatantly obvious in order to save me for ... DERP
That's funny. In Anything Goes Mafia, there was a confirmed guilty on me, and my buddy used the gladiator shot, sparing me one day and ending up winning the game in LyLo.
In post 2599, T S O wrote:So either wguerts is town and pisskop is ???, or they're both scum. In the latter case pisskop is still a better lynch, because we know wguerts is a scum-Gladiator, but we don't know what pisskop is.
No, I don't see how you came to this conclusion.
In post 2602, beeboy wrote:In post 2599, T S O wrote:So either wguerts is town and pisskop is ???, or they're both scum. In the latter case pisskop is still a better lynch, because we know wguerts is a scum-Gladiator, but we don't know what pisskop is.
Or wguerts is scum and pisskop is town. How exactly isn't this a scenario where a scum gladiator thought they could get an easy lynch and use Mimi's night action once more.
I'm agreeing with a beeboy post...what is happening?
In post 2643, pisskop wrote:TSO has the ability to iso people, and yet here is he pretending to be pushing something meaningful.
Its so meanignful that everyone else is flat out ignoring his posts on the matter.
I do think you should quote them though...
Rob's 2642 is an excellent summary of my thoughts.
In post 2648, T S O wrote:Rob - once Nicole flipped scum, he would be utterly doomed. You know that's true. By the end of d4 he would either have been investigated, lynched or vigged. The positive utility of Nicole surviving one solitary day is utterly eclipsed by Wguerts' almost certain death after her scumflip. And he wasn't even being scumread by many people.
Not really. Like I said before, my buddy did this same thing and won.
TSO's posts about wguerts being town are pinging me hard. I think this was a massively risky play from scum and it's backfiring spectacularly. A wguerts lynch would help a lot in discerning alignments.
No, don't stop fighting the good fight! The most plausible action is that scum wanted Mimi to get another night action in, so wguerts used the gladiator on a player that would be super easy to lynch from his PoV. He made sure to call for a vig on Mimi and everything. It's not as bad as TSO is making it out to be. The mistake is that pisskop isn't as easy a lynch as they thought. I'm not even positive pisskop is town (though I am thinking he is) because the claim is weird, but I would much rather lynch wguerts.
In post 2697, T S O wrote:Have you read the game, Suzune?
I don't like that you're discrediting Suzune rather than explaining why you think she's wrong.
In post 2712, Nicole Mimi Tithel wrote:I'm probably voting wgeurts btw.
Why? The main reason for wgeurts-scum relies on you being scum as well.
@Cool
Mimi is smart and realizes people are piecing together that wguerts could have used the gladiator to save her. I wouldn't put it past her to vote him to shake that suspicion.
In post 2759, wgeurts wrote:In post 2393, T S O wrote:I'll deal with this game before I go to bed tonight. Wguerts, what were you thinking?
I wanted to get someone dead that I've seen is a hell to actually get lynched in other games. Impulsive, yeah I guess. But nobody is discussing reads and pushing people and that's not helping anyone.
What made you think you would have the towncred to lynch someone who is supposedly hard to lynch?
In post 2776, pisskop wrote:like I cant believe hes pulling the 'lynch me if hes town shit'
youre a fucking gladiator whose head is swollen. you literally 1v1me and lost as a confirmed gladiator.
Lol this is so true.
In post 2795, Maxous wrote:In post 2507, YT2980 wrote:Why are you so bent on him role-claiming?
I'm ngl, I think it's a bad decision. Damned if he is, damned if he don't as one might say... But he has a higher chance of remaining alive if he doesn't claim and if he doesn't give scum any unnecessary information.
The way you're going about this could easily be because you're wanting your scum partners to have more info after you are nk'd or lynched. Why should he trust you? Why should he trust that your intent is for the better?
I stand by Rob for now.
this is an impressive amount of waffling that says shag all.
you were also waffling about wguerts IIRC
first scum-read noted.
Look who finally has his first scumread!
In post 2798, wgeurts wrote:If anyone protects Mimi though they'll basically be scum claiming later when they claim their role. If she is still alive by tomorrow we should lynch her anyway.
Why the fuck would anyone claim to have protected Mimi?
There it is.
In post 2848, Flubbernugget wrote:Page 91
With Rob's investigation only being 90% clean the gladiator isn't good but doesn't come off as a scum claim to me. I'm not thrilled but am also not devastated that we will have to handle the investigation later, but also with more information.
Depending on how much thread space the discussion is taking up I do think rob full claiming would benefit town, and remove the resistance on the mimi wagon that allowed this gladiate to happen in the first place. However, with what I have read so far, I think that should be done tomorrow since we can't lynch either today.
I was liking Flubbernugget until this post.
In post 2852, CooLDoG wrote:^god, we need to kill almost at some point.
In post 2874, pisskop wrote:what part of your role indicates we have the option to NL?
vote No Lynch
Dig the sauce, its stronger than youll ever have. vc show us nl
No.
In post 2926, pisskop wrote:I would say that ely is scum. Town ely is more involved. OC scum ely is too . . . but I dont like her slot.
I don't lurk as either alignment. You know this. I'll be active from here on out hopefully, but don't scumread me for that. I've had tons of shit going on.
In post 2930, pisskop wrote:I mean I did explicitly call her out, and she retreated into the shadows like some kind of ghoul.
I asked you three questions, which you ignored.
In post 2968, Nicole Mimi Tithel wrote:We do not no lynch.
wgeurts is what I would prefer, solely because my read on him is not multiball-proof whereas pisskop looks undeniably town regardless of whether he'd have scumhunting available as a part of his scum play.
I'm pretty set on this so I'm voting now, though I won't be ready for day to end until this evening when I have a chance to elaborate on/respond to some things in more depth.
As for tonight, vig being 50/50 on me/another person is the theoretically correct play, I think. Hopefully this will result in me being shot so you all start D3 with that info, if not, meh.
Vote: wgeurts
Hmmm.
In post 2987, popsofctown wrote:because the worst designed role in mafia got a guilty
What?
In post 3007, Nicole Mimi Tithel wrote:In post 2986, SirCakez wrote:In post 2978, Nicole Mimi Tithel wrote:K, TSO is scum. Add that to the list of things I need to accomplish.
Are you going to elaborate on this or no?
TSO is scum in no small part because of his treatment of me. He asks why people are even bothering to listen to what I say, yet he clearly read, understood, and _liked_ some of my posts, including my reads wall and my original point about wgeurts. His justification that "I'm confirmed scum and just trying to muddy the waters as much as I can" is ad-hoc, and contradicts his previously displayed (immutable) mindset that my posts _are_ worth reading on the 1% chance I flip town (which I will). I believe this was done because he's scrambling to lynch pisskop over wgeurts for strategic reasons, saw pops engaging with me, and felt like he had to make up a reason to keep pops in his desired position.
Another reason is that his push on pisskop itself is nonsensical, which is a large part of why I can empathize with the way pisskop reacted to it.
I'm somewhat surprised you think I would give the slightest fuck how I look, since no matter what happens I'm dead by the end of tomorrow at latest. I'm at least going to make a splash on my way out.
I agree with this, especially in a possible multiball scenario where scum shouldn't be totally ignored.
In post 3025, YT2980 wrote:I'm attempting to reread the thread, and came across Elyse's only providing reads in the thread and there are more scum reads than town reads provided. So, Elyse, when you get the chance, can you provide a more thorough list in which the majority is NOT scum?
I'm looking for town reads and scum reads, and I'll try to provide a new list before long, but it'll likely take a while given how fast the game is moving.
I am going to grab dinner but when I come back I will post a full reads list (even though I hate them) so everyone knows where my head is at.
VOTE: wgeurts
All caught up! Be back in like an hour for a reads list + any questions directed at me.-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
Here are my reads.
02 Rob13 - Town
03 Nicole Mimi Tithel - Scum
05 beeboy - Unsure. There are so many things that make him scummy but then a few things make me go "there's no way that could be scum"
06 YT2980 - Scum lean. He's seemed to fade into the background whilst not lurking or anything...I'm keeping my eye out here.
07 I_Am_Not_Varsoon* - Null
08 T S O - Scum
09 PeregrineV - Town
11 Suzune - Town
12 Maxous - Scum
13 CooLDoG - Town lean
14 Flubbernugget - Town lean
15 Venmar - Probably town
16 grapes - Town
17 wgeurts - Scum
18 Almost50 - Scum
20 Nero Cain - Could be scum, he's not doing anything
21 Elyse
22 popsofctown - Scum
23 pisskop - Probably town
24 SirCakez - Town
That's probably too many scumreads but it's how I feel.-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013